• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Republicans are the party of chaos and catastrophe.

“Everybody’s entitled to be an idiot.”

Roe isn’t about choice, it’s about freedom.

Thanks to your bullshit, we are now under siege.

“Squeaker” McCarthy

When do we start airlifting the women and children out of Texas?

Proof that we need a blogger ethics panel.

Optimism opens the door to great things.

A snarling mass of vitriolic jackals

JFC, are there no editors left at that goddamn rag?

Schmidt just says fuck it, opens a tea shop.

Americans barely caring about Afghanistan is so last month.

Whoever he was, that guy was nuts.

Never entrust democracy to any process that requires republicans to act in good faith.

Authoritarian republicans are opposed to freedom for the rest of us.

The GOP couldn’t organize an orgy in a whorehouse with a fist full of 50s.

Incompetence, fear, or corruption? why not all three?

People are complicated. Love is not.

A sufficient plurality of insane, greedy people can tank any democratic system ever devised, apparently.

I’d like to think you all would remain faithful to me if i ever tried to have some of you killed.

The next time the wall wtreet journal editorial board speaks the truth will be the first.

Reality always lies in wait for … Democrats.

Everybody saw this coming.

Pessimism assures that nothing of any importance will change.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Republican Stupidity / George Deutsch Lives

George Deutsch Lives

by Tim F|  December 29, 200612:56 pm| 66 Comments

This post is in: Republican Stupidity, Science & Technology

FacebookTweetEmail

Surprising maybe one catatonic person in outer Mongolia, political appointees won’t let the Park Service tell visitors the geologic age of the Grand Canyon. Apparently this controversial science known as geology conflicts with the unerring truth as-it-is-written in the Koran Bible.

Awhile back rightwingers reacted with outrage that I would paint George Deutsch, the anti-big bang jihadist at NASA, as an example of how the president staffs our government. Sadly, these retards truly are everywhere. Some are merely making life difficult for park rangers and confusing tourists. But like hungry squirrels released in a bomb silo others have found a way to screw up things that matter. I have only read portions of Rajiv Chandrasekaran’s Imperial Life in the Emerald City (thanks to all of you who bought out the first printing) but I have seen enough to understand that our crucial early months of occupation ran on the same mix of naivete, inexperience and blind loyalty tests that fueled the appointment of underage nincompoops like Deutsch at NASA. If rebuilding Iraq is not too important to put experience before blind partisan loyalty then it is really, really hard to think of something that would make the cut.

Good luck to the next president in weeding out the George Deutsches and convincing professionals to come back. In the meantime we get to enjoy two more years of bright-eyed, ideologically pure squirrels in the wiring.

***Update***

Lots and lots of squirrels. via comments.

***Update 2***

The press release is bogus, according to this article in Skeptic magazine. Guess neither I nor they were skeptical enough the first time.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « I Think We’re A Clone Now
Next Post: Random Internet Fun »

Reader Interactions

66Comments

  1. 1.

    ThymeZone

    December 29, 2006 at 1:06 pm

    “As one park geologist said, this is equivalent of Yellowstone National Park selling a book entitled Geysers of Old Faithful: Nostrils of Satan,”

    They’re not?

    Good Christ, that’s comedy gold. I don’t think any spoofer can ever top this Grand Canyon = Noah’s Flood thing.

  2. 2.

    capelza

    December 29, 2006 at 1:07 pm

    It is unbelievable really except it actually is happening. And people tell me I am overreacting to the creeping religious takeover of this government.

    Norris Alderson is still my favourite though. The *Veterinarian* that was briefly appointed to head the Office of Women’s Health of the FDA. That it fell so flat it couldn’t be ignored and they tried to deny he had been chosen is another story. This admin thought a veterinarian was sufficient for women.

    Not to mention the new wingnut religious crackpot in charge of family planning in there now.

  3. 3.

    US Park Ranger

    December 29, 2006 at 1:45 pm

    Apparently this controversial science known as geology conflicts with the unerring truth as-it-is-written in the Koran Bible.

    Noah’s Flood caused the Jameson-esque pink crack in the Earth, damn you. Nevermind that a flood wouldn’t, by its nature, wash large cracks in the Earth as much as drown poor Black people.

    How dare you question the Bible, especially the part about Eve having two sons, so any offspring that followed had to be by Eve having sex with her sons. Incest is best. Just ask Missouri.

  4. 4.

    demimondian

    December 29, 2006 at 1:48 pm

    Meh. This is all a tempest in a teapot. a drop in the ocean.

  5. 5.

    VidaLoca

    December 29, 2006 at 1:59 pm

    Good luck to the next president in weeding out the George Deutsches and convincing professionals to come back.

    If the George Deutsches were just “political appointees” it would be bad but they could be weeded out. But it’s even worse than that — a lot of these people have been co-opted into civil service positions which means that they’ll be the gift that keeps on giving long after Bush is gone.

  6. 6.

    Don McArthur

    December 29, 2006 at 2:06 pm

    It’s a pervasive problem. The next time you see ‘journalist’ Kate O’Beirne pontificating on TV, remember that her husband is a White House appointee to the Pentagon. His job? He does religious litmus testing for contractors who want to grab some loot in Iraq, querying them as to their stand on abortion, etc.

    So O’Beirne’s family income is dependent on keeping the White House happy. Hmmmm….

  7. 7.

    Steve

    December 29, 2006 at 2:08 pm

    I keep trying to point out to my wife that if we think anti-science stories like this are ridiculous, then we need to be a little more accepting of the use of actual science to establish things like, you know, the safety of cloned meat.

    However, I keep losing the argument. Naturally.

  8. 8.

    ThymeZone

    December 29, 2006 at 2:12 pm

    Incest is best

    Now you tell me.

    Youth is indeed wasted on the young.

  9. 9.

    The Other Steve

    December 29, 2006 at 2:29 pm

    I keep trying to point out to my wife that if we think anti-science stories like this are ridiculous, then we need to be a little more accepting of the use of actual science to establish things like, you know, the safety of cloned meat.

    The problem with the USDA argument is not the safety of cloned meat.

    It’s the steady decline of biodiversity.

    So now not only are we limited our meat production to one breed of cattle, we’re going to limit it down to one single representative DNA.

    So if we find out later that cow that was chosen has a genetic problem which makes it susceptible to a disease and all the cows die.

    Wow, I guess we’re just fucked then.

  10. 10.

    Davebo

    December 29, 2006 at 2:32 pm

    So now not only are we limited our meat production to one breed of cattle, we’re going to limit it down to one single representative DNA.

    I’d agree if that were the case, or even a part of the overall plan. But since it’s not, it’s sort of a mute point.

  11. 11.

    Zifnab

    December 29, 2006 at 2:36 pm

    So if we find out later that cow that was chosen has a genetic problem which makes it susceptible to a disease and all the cows die.

    Wow, I guess we’re just fucked then.

    I’m confident there will be at least some degree of bio-diversity. At least as far as patient law will allow it. And this is more a problem for the meat industry than it is for the consumer. If the price of steak goes through the roof because all the cows in Montana just go belly up, then you just buy chicken, and Montana farmers learn not to play god with beefsteaks. If the chickens go belly up too, you start eating alot more beans and rudabega.

    This is a classic example of where the government just needs to step back and let the market take care of itself. Organic vegetables are doing quite well. I’m confident someone will start releasing “Diversa-Beef: From Real Diverse Cows! Taste the Rainbow! (TM) ” and make a killing.

  12. 12.

    SeesThroughIt

    December 29, 2006 at 2:48 pm

    make a killing.

    * rimshot *

  13. 13.

    craigie

    December 29, 2006 at 2:50 pm

    and make a killing.

    Uh, so to speak.

  14. 14.

    Steve

    December 29, 2006 at 3:10 pm

    But since it’s not, it’s sort of a mute point.

    I’d argue that it’s more of a moo point. /Joey

  15. 15.

    dreggas

    December 29, 2006 at 3:12 pm

    This is a classic example of where the government just needs to step back and let the market take care of itself. Organic vegetables are doing quite well. I’m confident someone will start releasing “Diversa-Beef: From Real Diverse Cows! Taste the Rainbow! (TM) ” and make a killing.

    Willing to steak a claim on that?

  16. 16.

    Zifnab

    December 29, 2006 at 3:19 pm

    I would, if you’d be willing to meat and shake on it.

  17. 17.

    dreggas

    December 29, 2006 at 3:25 pm

    only if you don’t go and get some fancy lawyer to butcher the cash cow it could be.

  18. 18.

    Krista

    December 29, 2006 at 3:45 pm

    This admin thought a veterinarian was sufficient for women.

    Exsqueeze me? A veterinarian? Not that I don’t have high respect for vets, but that just really seems inappropriate.

  19. 19.

    demimondian

    December 29, 2006 at 3:47 pm

    Yes, Krista, a veterinarian. You know, because women are just cows that drop calves and produce milk, after all.

    Horrifying, isn’t it?

  20. 20.

    Andrew

    December 29, 2006 at 3:50 pm

    Exsqueeze me? A veterinarian? Not that I don’t have high respect for vets, but that just really seems inappropriate.

    It’s okay. It was a large animal specialist.

  21. 21.

    Andrew

    December 29, 2006 at 3:51 pm

    Okay, sorry for that. I kid, I kid! Don’t beat me. Please.

  22. 22.

    Zifnab

    December 29, 2006 at 3:51 pm

    It’s okay. It was a large animal specialist.

    Hehe. He just called you a fatty.

  23. 23.

    TenguPhule

    December 29, 2006 at 4:06 pm

    only if you don’t go and get some fancy lawyer to butcher the cash cow it could be.

    Because you know they’d only make a hash of it.

  24. 24.

    TenguPhule

    December 29, 2006 at 4:08 pm

    I would, if you’d be willing to meat and shake on it.

    I may stew a little before I chuck-le at the ribbing.

  25. 25.

    TenguPhule

    December 29, 2006 at 4:09 pm

    Hehe. He just called you a fatty.

    And what’s your beef with the obesity impaired?

  26. 26.

    Tsulagi

    December 29, 2006 at 4:11 pm

    We have a government approved/endorsed/whatever book for sale at the Grand Canyon National Park saying the canyon was created by Noah’s flood apparently less than 6,000 years ago?
    ???????????

    Kids going to school in short busses would laugh at these retards.

  27. 27.

    ThymeZone

    December 29, 2006 at 4:19 pm

    This meat-based pun cascade?

    It’s rare to find such good punnish humor around here. This isn’t a medium that encourages it.

    It’s an A-1 way to get the New Year’s weekend under way.

    Well, as they say, ‘Tis the Seasoning.

    With that, I think you can say without a Chateubriand of a doubt, I’m well done. Oh, I’ve been called a pinko, if only in the middle, but that’s not the most juicy thing that’s ever been said about me.

    Okay, off the other threads, I’m feeling lean.

    And mean, but mostly lean.

    Don’t like my jokes? Bite me.

  28. 28.

    TenguPhule

    December 29, 2006 at 4:24 pm

    This isn’t a medium that encourages it.

    I agree it is rather rare, but the humor hasn’t completely bled out of here.

    Don’t like my jokes? Bite me.

    First we must ketchup to you from the flank, Chuck.

    I fully expect to roast for this.

  29. 29.

    ThymeZone

    December 29, 2006 at 4:34 pm

    I fully expect to roast for this.

    You’re a gyro in my eyes.

  30. 30.

    automandc

    December 29, 2006 at 4:39 pm

    Haven’t we been eating what are essentially cloned foods for at least 100s if not 1000s of years in the form of plants? Maybe a horticulturist or plant biologist can elaborate or correct, but don’t many agricultural practices result in genetic identity between “parent” and “child”?

    I would be more worried about the “mad scientists” who are out there changing the cow (pig, chicken, rice, etc.) DNA to make “better” cows (etc.) — not the ones who like the cow(s) we have already, and think we should keep making more of the same….

  31. 31.

    Darrell

    December 29, 2006 at 4:41 pm

    Surprising maybe one catatonic person in outer Mongolia, political appointees won’t let the Park Service tell visitors the geologic age of the Grand Canyon.

    Ok libs, if you’re willing to accept putting the cross back on the LA County seal, then I think we should put the geology science back in the Grand Canyon parks dept. Fair enough? Removing one in the name of separation of church and state is just as extreme as removing the other in the name of Christianity.

  32. 32.

    TenguPhule

    December 29, 2006 at 4:44 pm

    You’re a gyro in my eyes.

    As long as I’ve carved out my piece and not been a jerky.

  33. 33.

    TenguPhule

    December 29, 2006 at 4:45 pm

    Removing one in the name of separation of church and state is just as extreme as removing the other in the name of Christianity.

    Shorter Darrell: If you want your facts, you need to accept that Christianity owns ah juu!

  34. 34.

    ThymeZone

    December 29, 2006 at 4:56 pm

    Removing one in the name of separation of church and state is just as extreme as removing the other in the name of Christianity.

    God, you’re fucking stupid.

    How about if the Park Service sells a book that says that the canyon was dug by good fairies? Okay with you, Darrell?

  35. 35.

    TenguPhule

    December 29, 2006 at 5:00 pm

    God, you’re fucking stupid.

    ThymeZone, this is Darrell you’re talking about. It’s redundant.

    A pity that he decided to come and pee in this thread.

  36. 36.

    Binky

    December 29, 2006 at 5:07 pm

    Kids going to school in short busses China would laugh at these retards.

    I’m a grad student in CompSci. As many of you can probably guess, a lot of my fellow students (order 50% or more) are from overseas and of that group, the vast majority are from China and India. They look at this stuff and they ask us US students “what the f*ck are you guys thinking?” They’re polite so they don’t laugh out loud; it comes across more as sympathetic than anything else. But I’d say, yeah, there’s a little bit of smugness there.

    Hard to blame them, really.

  37. 37.

    Steve

    December 29, 2006 at 5:11 pm

    Even Darrell agrees this is nuts. Thread over.

    Incidentally, I sent the link to my friend the national park ranger, who seemed rather nonplussed. “Well, you never know what to say, you hate to offend anyone…” Indeed.

  38. 38.

    Zifnab

    December 29, 2006 at 5:14 pm

    They look at this stuff and they ask us US students “what the f*ck are you guys thinking?” They’re polite so they don’t laugh out loud; it comes across more as sympathetic than anything else. But I’d say, yeah, there’s a little bit of smugness there.

    Hard to blame them, really.

    No need to worry. We’ll all be speaking Chinese in 50 years anyway. I, for one, choose to embrace our insect overlords.

  39. 39.

    Zifnab

    December 29, 2006 at 5:14 pm

    “Well, you never know what to say, you hate to offend anyone…” Indeed.

    Just don’t say “Happy Holidays.”

  40. 40.

    Binky

    December 29, 2006 at 5:27 pm

    Zifnab,

    I, for one, choose to embrace our insect overlords.

    I know you’re joking about this, and … what else can a person say?

    I have to tell you, though — to sit around in some of the conversations I’ve sat through and try to explain how, yes, there really are people in the United States of America in the year 2006 who will pull their kids out of school and “home school” them to believe that the earth is 6000 years old and God put dinosaur bones in the earth to puzzle the scientists and Noah brought a couple of T.Rex’s along in the Ark and the Flood created the Grand Canyon — and it’s into the hands of these people that we’re going to entrust the last 100 years of scientific and technical expertise that we’ve built in this country…

    It just sorta takes the wind out of a person’s sails, y’know?

  41. 41.

    Zifnab

    December 29, 2006 at 5:43 pm

    I’m sure they’ll keep snickering right up until the Christian Wave sweeps right over the Middle Kingdom.

    China’s Christian population is growing at about the rate of about ten thousand new converts a day, so while the government may be virulently anti-religion, the reality among the populace is somewhat at odds with government policy.

    I can speak from personal experience about the FOB Baptist Churches in Houston filled to the brim with asians touched by the power of Jesus. I’m sure your classmates will get a rude awakening to exactly how bad the Evangelical Ignorance problem really can be once it takes hold.

  42. 42.

    ThymeZone

    December 29, 2006 at 5:43 pm

    this is Darrell you’re talking about. It’s redundant.

    You can say that again.

    this is Darrell you’re talking about. It’s redundant.

    You can say that again.

    this is Darrell you’re talking about. It’s redundant.

    You can say that again.

    etc.

  43. 43.

    Digital Amish

    December 29, 2006 at 6:34 pm

    Christ on a crutch! Is there no thread safe from Darreliction.

  44. 44.

    CaseyL

    December 29, 2006 at 6:40 pm

    One thing we’ve learned from the cloning done so far is that the offspring are not, in fact, absolutely identical to the original. Yes, you start with the same genes, but they still express differently. That’s why, for example, the cloned critters don’t have the same markings as the ‘parent.’ My question is, does this different expression result in functional variations, or just somatic ones?

    Also, the problem of diversity isn’t confined to cloning. ‘1491’ and ‘Guns, Germs and Steel’ both posit that Native Americans were/are particularly susceptible to new diseases because they started out as a genetically small group and even a millenium of migration and selection didn’t result in enough genetic variation to withstand the influx of exotics. This is a huge, huge argument in favor of exogamy. And “purebred” anything – dogs, cats, cattle, humans, trees – is bound to be more vulnerable to genetic defects and exotic diseases.

  45. 45.

    Tsulagi

    December 29, 2006 at 7:58 pm

    I can speak from personal experience about the FOB Baptist Churches in Houston filled to the brim with asians touched by the power of Jesus. I’m sure your classmates will get a rude awakening to exactly how bad the Evangelical Ignorance problem really can be once it takes hold.

    That’s funny.

    We’ll get those godless commies! Can we send our Christian warriors (Dobson, Falwell, and PatR) there now? I’d pay for Dobson’s one-way airfare.

  46. 46.

    Fledermaus

    December 29, 2006 at 8:13 pm

    “Incest is best”

    Indeed, it is a game the whole family can enjoy.

  47. 47.

    ThymeZone

    December 29, 2006 at 8:13 pm

    I fully expect to roast for this.

    You’re a gyro in my eyes.

    God, that was gold. Gold, I tell you.

  48. 48.

    Krista

    December 29, 2006 at 8:27 pm

    Yes, Krista, a veterinarian. You know, because women are just cows that drop calves and produce milk, after all.

    Horrifying, isn’t it?

    I like to think that it was just sheer idiocy that prompted it, as opposed to that conscious train of thought, but then again, those bozos lost any right to the benefit of the doubt ages ago.

    Andrew? Go piss up a stump, darling.

    TZ:

    You’re a gyro in my eyes.

    That WAS nicely done…I actually had to think about it for a second, as we don’t have gyros here, so I had to remind myself how they were pronounced (we have donairs, which are pretty similar, but the sauce is different.)

  49. 49.

    ThymeZone

    December 29, 2006 at 8:32 pm

    That WAS nicely done

    I think it might be my Sistine Chapel.

    Well, except for the fact that I didn’t have to lie on my back on a scaffold 60 feet in the air all day for four years to create it.

    But aside from that, definitely my Sistine Chapel.

  50. 50.

    demimondian

    December 29, 2006 at 8:48 pm

    Haven’t we been eating what are essentially cloned foods for at least 100s if not 1000s of years in the form of plants?

    Indeed we have.

    Three words: Irish Potato Famine.

  51. 51.

    TenguPhule

    December 29, 2006 at 11:27 pm

    As long as it has the same taste, texture and nutrients I see nothing wrong with cloned meat, hell they could grow it in boneless masses in vats for all I care.

  52. 52.

    ThymeZone

    December 30, 2006 at 10:56 am

    I see nothing wrong with cloned meat, hell they could grow it in boneless masses in vats for all I care.

    Ah, then your wish is granted!

  53. 53.

    Darrell

    December 30, 2006 at 1:00 pm

    How about if the Park Service sells a book that says that the canyon was dug by good fairies? Okay with you, Darrell?

    I already stated that I think the Park rangers should be able to give their best geological estimate of when the GC was created. I only wanted to point out that your side is/was equally extreme in demanding that the cross be taken out of the LA county seal. I think it’s clear that you liberals have a blind spot to your own extremism, probably because you’re too busy pointing fingers at christians.

    And since you bring it up regarding “unscientific” book sales in the park bookstore, I’m pretty sure that I’ve seen books in State and National parks on ghost hauntings and other legends pertaining to certain park sites.. I’m sure you’ve issued your strenous objections to the sale of those books too, right?

  54. 54.

    VidaLoca

    December 30, 2006 at 1:00 pm

    Steve,

    Incidentally, I sent the link to my friend the national park ranger, who seemed rather nonplussed. “Well, you never know what to say, you hate to offend anyone…” Indeed.

    Evidently it’s official policy:

    “In order to avoid offending religious fundamentalists, our National Park Service is under orders to suspend its belief in geology,” stated PEER Executive Director Jeff Ruch. “It is disconcerting that the official position of a national park as to the geologic age of the Grand Canyon is ‘no comment.’”

  55. 55.

    TenguPhule

    December 30, 2006 at 1:56 pm

    I think it’s clear that you liberals have a blind spot to your own extremism, probably because you’re too busy pointing fingers at christians.

    Shorter Darrell: Fuck your seperation of Church and State

    You can have your cross on it when I can have my Flying Spagetti Monster(tm) on it too.

  56. 56.

    Jonathan

    December 30, 2006 at 8:57 pm

    Darrell: Actually liberals are pointing fingers at a small but very visible and vocal minority of fundamentalist Christians. Even the fundamentalist Christians are mostly fairly reasonable people who accept the fact that the Earth is billions of years old. The “young Earth” fundamentalists are a relatively small subset of all fundamentalists.

    Many Christians are themselves liberal, despite the fact that liberal Christians get very little exposure in the MSM who seem to almost always put the likes of Falwell and Robertson on to represent the “Christian” viewpoint.

    As far as the cross on the LA county seal, why should a specifically religious symbol be on the insignia of a government entity in the first place? Such a symbol excludes those who do not subscribe to the religion which the symbol represents, for instance Jews. The USA was founded as a secular Republic and any injection of religion into government is a violation of the founding principles that have helped keep the USA largely free of sectarian violence for over two hundred years now. I’m not saying that the cross on the LA county seal is going to cause sectarian violence, but is an, admittedly very small, step in that direction.

    One of the lessons from Iraq is that favoritism of one sect over another by government can lead to sectarian violence just as we are seeing violence between Shia and Sunni there now because Saddam favored Sunni over Shia.

  57. 57.

    Jonathan

    December 30, 2006 at 9:04 pm

    One last thing Darrell, I don’t care whether “young earth” books are sold in Park stores as long as there is no effort made to exclude scientifically accurate books.

  58. 58.

    Krista

    December 30, 2006 at 9:32 pm

    “In order to avoid offending religious fundamentalists, our National Park Service is under orders to suspend its belief in geology,” stated PEER Executive Director Jeff Ruch. “It is disconcerting that the official position of a national park as to the geologic age of the Grand Canyon is ‘no comment.’”

    Understatement, thy name is Jeff Ruch.

  59. 59.

    Zerthimon

    December 30, 2006 at 10:59 pm

    Well the official Grand Canyon website doesn’t seem to be following this gag order

    http://www.nps.gov/grca/faqs.htm

    How old is the Canyon?

    That’s a tricky question. Although rocks exposed in the walls of the canyon are geologically quite old, the Canyon itself is a fairly young feature. The oldest rocks at the canyon bottom are close to 2000 million years old. The Canyon itself – an erosional feature – has formed only in the past five or six million years. Geologically speaking, Grand Canyon is very young.

    Sorry, I’m skeptical of this article.

  60. 60.

    ThymeZone

    December 31, 2006 at 10:13 am

    I only wanted to point out that your side is/was equally extreme in demanding

    Faced with a contest between superstition and science, you think there are two “sides?”

    Like in a tug of war?

    There aren’t “sides.” There’s truth, and there’s lie. It is a lie to say that the earth is 6000 years old or that the canyon was created by Noah’s flood.

    When you sign up for a bald-faced lie, you aren’t on a “side.” You’re an outlier, a defect.

    Go away.

  61. 61.

    CalDevil

    December 31, 2006 at 2:19 pm

    Looks like the current NPS Grand Canyon Vistor’s Guide also is bucking the anti-geologic age conspiracy that Tim and his friends have bravely uncovered.

    http://www.nps.gov/grca/upload/2006winter.pdf

    It increasingly appears that many of these “Christianist” conspiracy promoters are guided by the same type of zealous blind faith and resistance to empirical evidence that they claim to be the hallmarks of those whom they scorn. One almost might consider this a religious, if not cult like, mindset.

    But then, I’m just a faithless agnostic with a skeptical nature and easy access to internet search engines.

  62. 62.

    SeesThroughIt

    December 31, 2006 at 2:54 pm

    One of the lessons from Iraq is that favoritism of one sect over another by government can lead to sectarian violence just as we are seeing violence between Shia and Sunni there now because Saddam favored Sunni over Shia.

    Yes, but that’s because Islam is backward and wrong. Christianity never, ever breaks down to such infighting. Nope. Not once. Government hopping in bed with religion can’t possibly be bad if that religion is Christianity!

    (Ouch. Thinking like a wingnut makes my head hurt.)

  63. 63.

    Zerthimon

    December 31, 2006 at 4:06 pm

    Can we get an update to this post that says that the PEER article is a bunch of BS?

  64. 64.

    bud

    January 2, 2007 at 8:30 pm

    Zerthimon:
    Can we get an update to this post that says that the PEER article is a bunch of BS?

    I just scrolled up top to see who wrote the original note…
    Tim.

    Fat chance.

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. Balloon Juice says:
    December 29, 2006 at 2:12 pm

    […] Lots and lots of squirrels. via comments. […]

  2. Balloon Juice says:
    January 17, 2007 at 1:34 pm

    […] For those keeping score I count this as the second time that I have picked up a bogus press release without realizing that I’ve been had. Is that a good record? Poor? Who knows. I doubt most bloggers keep count. […]

Primary Sidebar

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

2023 Pet Calendars

Pet Calendar Preview: A
Pet Calendar Preview: B

*Calendars can not be ordered until Cafe Press gets their calendar paper in.

Recent Comments

  • apocalipstick on Late Night Open Thread: America’s Rural Dependents Cousins (Jan 29, 2023 @ 5:25pm)
  • CaseyL on Open Thread (Jan 29, 2023 @ 5:22pm)
  • WaterGirl on Open Thread (Jan 29, 2023 @ 5:20pm)
  • brendancalling on Open Thread (Jan 29, 2023 @ 5:20pm)
  • brendancalling on Open Thread (Jan 29, 2023 @ 5:19pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Favorite Dogs & Cats
Classified Documents: A Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Front-pager Twitter

John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
ActualCitizensUnited

Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice   

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!