• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Their boy Ron is an empty plastic cup that will never know pudding.

It is not hopeless, and we are not helpless.

He seems like a smart guy, but JFC, what a dick!

Disagreements are healthy; personal attacks are not.

Since we are repeating ourselves, let me just say fuck that.

You know it’s bad when the Project 2025 people have to create training videos on “How To Be Normal”.

When we show up, we win.

Technically true, but collectively nonsense

Rupert, come get your orange boy, you petrified old dinosaur turd.

Do we throw up our hands or do we roll up our sleeves? (hint, door #2)

When they say they are pro-life, they do not mean yours.

Republicans want to make it harder to vote and easier for them to cheat.

They think we are photo bombing their nice little lives.

You would normally have to try pretty hard to self-incriminate this badly.

I see no possible difficulties whatsoever with this fool-proof plan.

This blog will pay for itself.

SCOTUS: It’s not “bribery” unless it comes from the Bribery region of France. Otherwise, it’s merely “sparkling malfeasance”.

You are so fucked. Still, I wish you the best of luck.

fuckem (in honor of the late great efgoldman)

Never give a known liar the benefit of the doubt.

I’m more christian than these people and i’m an atheist.

Tick tock motherfuckers!

Republicans got rid of McCarthy. Democrats chose not to save him.

Decision time: keep arguing about the last election, or try to win the next one?

Mobile Menu

  • 2026 Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2026 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Archives for 2009

Archives for 2009

The sorry state of economics

by DougJ|  February 17, 200911:39 am| 102 Comments

This post is in: Domestic Politics, Assholes

Greg Clark of UC Davis has a fascinating post at the Atlantic about the sorry state of contemporary academic economics:

as we have seen this year on the academic job market, macroeconomists had turned their considerable talents to a bizarre variety of rococo academic elaborations. With nothing of importance to explain, why not turn to the mysteries of online dating, for example.

[…]

The debate about the bank bailout, and the stimulus package, has all revolved around issues that are entirely at the level of Econ 1. What is the multiplier from government spending? Does government spending crowd out private spending? How quickly can you increase government spending? If you got a A in college in Econ 1 you are an expert in this debate: fully an equal of Summers and Geithner.

The bailout debate has also been conducted in terms that would be quite familiar to economists in the 1920s and 1930s. There has essentially been no advance in our knowledge in 80 years.

It has seen people like Brad De Long accuse distinguished macro-economists like Eugene Fama and John Cochrane of the University of Chicago of at least one “elementary, freshman mistake.”

….

Recently a group of economists affiliated with the Cato Institute ran an ad in the New York Times opposing the Obama’s stimulus plan. As chair of my department I tried to arrange a public debate between one of the signatories and a proponent of fiscal stimulus — thinking that would be a timely and lively session. But the signatory, a fully accredited university macroeconomist, declined the opportunity for public defense of his position on the grounds that “all I know on this issue I got from Greg Mankiw’s blog — I really am not equipped to debate this with anyone.”

One of the things that has always struck me about economists is their willingness to whore themselves out for dubious causes. You won’t find many reputable scientists denying global warming, but you found plenty of economists willing to defend the Bush economic plan.

But none of this should come as a surprise. What would one expect of a group that chose the most lucrative and least one of the least intellectually meritorious field of academic study?

The sorry state of economicsPost + Comments (102)

Time For Something Positive

by John Cole|  February 17, 200910:04 am| 16 Comments

This post is in: Cat Blogging, Dog Blogging

Ton of pet pics coming in, and we have reached the point that posting a pet pic is sort of like that Star Trek episode called “The Trouble with Tribbles.” I posted three pics last night, thinking I had whittled down the stack of 60 or so to go, and then I checked my email this morning and 14 more pics came in. For thoe of you wondering where your pet is, I will get to it. At any rate, some more:

As always, claim your pets in the comments. Have a good one, I will be back later.

Time For Something PositivePost + Comments (16)

What A Mess

by John Cole|  February 17, 20099:35 am| 73 Comments

This post is in: Domestic Politics, Politics, Republican Stupidity, Assholes

I was watching AC 360 last night, even though John King was filling in for Anderson Cooper, and the following segment was mind-numbing when you took it in its totality:

DAVID GERGEN, CNN SENIOR POLITICAL ANALYST: Well, John, I think there’s a range of priorities for him now.

Having cleared this hurdle — and it is a major victory for him — with the stimulus package, the White House knows that he has tougher, higher hurdles ahead. Tomorrow, just as he’s signing, he does have this automobile bailout problem hitting his desk with a big thud.

My sense is that, unlike where we were a few weeks ago, the possibility of the administration allowing some sort of structured bankruptcy to occur is higher today than it was a while back. I think there’s not a big stomach to keep putting money, dollar after dollar after dollar, into this.

The day after that, he’s going to announce his housing plan. That’s going to be expensive. People are going to be looking for details. He’s got the banking bailout still to come back to, the biggest of all of the problems, three times the cost, probably, of the stimulus package.

Nobody knows what — how to deal with these toxic assets, a real question whether we’re moving toward nationalization. And, then, at the end of the month, John, as you well know, he has to — he has to face the deficits and produce a budget that’s going to forecast deficits out 10 years. And I think they’re going to be eye-popping.

KING: Well, Gloria, let’s follow on that point. Republicans are now saying, Obama is presiding over the era of big bailouts.

I asked Senator John McCain yesterday if he thought the stimulus fight indicated the beginning of a partisan war. He didn’t go quite that far, but he did say this. It’s a bad beginning,” he says, because what we promised the American people, what President Obama promised the American people, that we would sit down together.

A bad beginning, Gloria? Is that just political criticism, or are we going to see this, Republicans drawing this line, as we go on and on and on?

***

KING: And, Joe, we’re seeing more and more evidence of the pain at the state level, Kansas saying today it doesn’t have the money to give people their income tax refunds, California tonight saying 20,000 people will be laid off.

As the governors deal with this pain, A, how soon might this money get to the states to help them, and, B, are people out there going to blame their governors, or might they start to blame their president?

JOE JOHNS, CNN SENIOR CORRESPONDENT: Well, the truth of it is, if you look at the economic models on this recession, a lot of people are suggesting the main thing the president has to do is avoid another big blow to the economy. And, certainly, you want to manage and minimize the economic turmoil in the states.

***

People may want to blame Barack Obama, but, at the end of the day, once this money goes out the door, in a lot of ways, it’s going to be up to the states and how well they’re prepared to try to get this money out quickly, John.

KING: And, David, we’re talking about the long list of domestic challenges, but another huge issue facing this president, his press secretary saying he is close to making a decision on sending potentially thousands of more American troops into Afghanistan.

I am sorry for the length of that excerpt, but I wanted you to get the full feel for it, as it went on for almost five minutes. It was simply point after point of disaster or looming disaster, and even though it did not touch on everything currently facing the President, it seemed like an overwhelming list. Right now we are facing the equivalent of an economic 9/11, and all of these problems have been dumped on the current administration. I don’t remember a time when a new administration had so many problems. Even the Bush administration had eight months to get itself together before 9/11. By way of comparison, this is what the Bush administration was dealing with on February 24th, 2001:

About the only thing Bush had to deal with at the time was how to spend the budget surplus and dealing with some angry Democrats still pissed off about the 2000 election. Compared to the current crisis, especially when you consider the the Republicans who helped to create or created most of these problems have nothing to offer but spitballs and chants of porkulus, it just makes your blood boil. I don’t even want them to agree with President Obama or the Democrats on everything, I just want them to act in good faith, and apparently that is too much for them. Country first.

Yesterday, David Frum and Rouss Douthat had a back and forth about the hopelessness of the current GOP, and missing from these discussions was one key point- the recognition that the Republicans are where they are for a reason. They earned the minority, fair and square. They worked hard to get where they are, and the deserve to be in the position they are currently in electorally.

What A MessPost + Comments (73)

No Charges Against Phelps

by John Cole|  February 17, 20099:16 am| 23 Comments

This post is in: The War on Your Neighbor, aka the War on Drugs

As predicted by most of you in the comments, there will be no charges against Michael Phelps:

Michael Phelps will not face criminal charges after a photo of him apparently smoking marijuana from a pipe sparked an investigation in South Carolina.

Richland County Sheriff Leon Lott said Monday that he didn’t have enough physical evidence to press charges against the 23-year-old swimmer after the November party near the University of South Carolina in Columbia.

“We had a photo and him saying he was sorry for inappropriate behavior,” Lott said at a news conference. “He never said, ‘I smoked marijuana.’ We didn’t have physical evidence.”

Lott defended the investigation, calling Phelps “an American hero … but even with his star status, he is still obligated to obey the laws of our state.”

I would have loved to have an inside scoop on the conversations between the Sheriff and the DA.

No Charges Against PhelpsPost + Comments (23)

Californication

by John Cole|  February 17, 20099:01 am| 99 Comments

This post is in: Domestic Politics, Politics

Looks like right now, the state is well and truly screwed:

The state of California — its deficits ballooning, its lawmakers intransigent and its governor apparently bereft of allies or influence — appears headed off the fiscal rails.

Since the fall, when lawmakers began trying to attack the gaps in the $143 billion budget that their earlier plan had not addressed, the state has fallen into deeper financial straits, with more bad news coming daily from Sacramento. The state, nearly out of cash, has laid off scores of workers and put hundreds more on unpaid furloughs. It has stopped paying counties and issuing income tax refunds and halted thousands of infrastructure projects.

Twenty-thousand layoff notices will go out on Tuesday morning, Matt David, the communications director for Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, said Monday night. “In the absence of a budget we need to realize this savings and the process takes six months,” Mr. David said.

I haven’t followed the internal politics of California closely, so I really have only a passing knowledge (translation- I only know what I know from national news sources), but I am aware there is some law that was passed that makes it nearly impossible to raise taxes and that the Republican minority seems to run the show. If that is an inaccurate perception, or if you have more to offer, fill us in in the comments.

At any rate, with the suspension of infrastructure projects and the pinkslipping of tens of thousands of employees, they are costing themselves even more money in the long run:

Even stranger math: The Senate Transportation Committee held a hearing not that long ago where Caltrans director Will Kempton explained that 276 infrastructure projects are going to be suspended tomorrow to save $3.7 billion dollars and prevent the state from defaulting on its loans. But as John Myers of KQED Capitol Notes explained, even stopping the projects costs money:

Kempton: will cost $199 million to shut projects down, $192 million to restart them.

Thus, not only is California a mirror of the cycle that is playing out nationwide- people are losing their jobs or worried about losing their jobs, as such they are spending less money in attempts to save, causing more businesses to not make money and they lay off employees, meaning there are more people with less money and worried about their future, etc., but it also seems to be falling into the cycle that we see played out all the time in poorer communities. In rural areas of WV it is not uncommon for people with inadequate resources to stay mired in poverty forever, whether it be because they do not have the money for transportation, education, or even to purchase the appropriate attire for work, they borrow money from pay day lenders at astronomical lending rates and get deeper in deeper in debt without making any steps forward, and they slowly spiral downwards. This plays out across the spectrum in poor areas here- people are too poor to purchase health insurance, thus have inadequate health care, thus they ignore smaller health issues until they become larger more expensive health issues. Long story short, there is a reason they call it the cycle of poverty.

At any rate, the comparison may not be perfect, but I am not sure how California will fight its way out of this mess. In recent weeks there have been stories about court orders requiring prisons to release convicts because the state has allegedly been unable to provide adequate care, and this is brought on in part by the massive prison population and the never-ending budget crisis. According to the Center for American Progress, California was slated to get 60 billion from the stimulus bill (and I do not know what version of the bill that map is based on), and you can see how the stimulus bill is really just going to be a temporary stopgap to avoid total disaster. A point for Krugman, if you will.

If you have more info, fill us in. It is worth noting that on top of all of this (in fact, perhaps a leading cause), is that California is ground zero in the current housing crisis.

CalifornicationPost + Comments (99)

Late night Eric Cantor video

by DougJ|  February 17, 200912:51 am| 44 Comments

This post is in: Clown Shoes

You’ve been hearing a lot about Eric Cantor over the last few days, but you’ll really be doing yourself a disservice if you don’t watch at least part of this bizarre video that he put out in 2007. I wasn’t able to figure out what it was about, but Clay Risen of TNR says it’s about something do with higher taxes on private equity firms. I think it’s supposed to be modeled after one of those choose-your-own adventure books that were so popular back in 2007.

More Cantor: He’s going to have House Republicans oppose Obama’s mortgage plan, whatever it turns out to be.

Late night Eric Cantor videoPost + Comments (44)

The War Against George Washington

by DougJ|  February 16, 200910:23 pm| 80 Comments

This post is in: Clown Shoes, I Read These Morons So You Don't Have To

I’m pretty sure the check-out guy at Target said “Happy Presidents’ Day” to me, rather than the customary “Merry George Washington Day”. Apparently, it’s all part of TWAG:

And yes, today’s federal holiday is still, and always has been, declared in federal law, as Washington’s Birthday, not any so-called amorphous “President’s Day” requiring celebrations of 43 Presidential oath takers:

[…]

Their propaganda in academia and media is the reason for the so-called “strong hold” of the false name of the holiday on the public consciousness. The liberal that wrote the above let’s her guard down when she mentions her dismissal of the law. Their contempt for the real America and the Founders extends to the framers of the highest law that is the U.S. Constitution, so why would they have any respect for a “mere” statute? The only “law” they respect are those made up by activist judges that violate their Oath to uphold the Constitution.

Maybe the rest of you won’t be amused but some of the comments have me laughing so hard that I’m crying:

Do you hear me people? There was not a biography of George Washington at the library!!

Update: Per the comments, Sadly, No! apparently covered this earlier today.

The War Against George WashingtonPost + Comments (80)

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 486
  • Page 487
  • Page 488
  • Page 489
  • Page 490
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 552
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - SkyBluePink -  10 Photos 6
Photo by SkyBluePink (4/15/26)
Donate

Election Resources

Voter Registration Info – Find a State
Check Voter Registration by Address
Election Calendar by State

Targeted Fundraising Info & Links

Recent Comments

  • Gloria DryGarden on 10 Things We Can Do Right Now (Apr 20, 2026 @ 9:20pm)
  • piratedan on Open Thread: The Onion Takes Custody of Infowars (Apr 20, 2026 @ 9:14pm)
  • WaterGirl on Let’s Do This! (Just $1,366 $674 $574 Needed to Meet Our Goal for Unf**k America) (Apr 20, 2026 @ 9:14pm)
  • Old School on Open Thread: The Onion Takes Custody of Infowars (Apr 20, 2026 @ 9:13pm)
  • Gloria DryGarden on 10 Things We Can Do Right Now (Apr 20, 2026 @ 9:13pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Outsmarting Apple iOS 26

Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Order Calendar A
Order Calendar B

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix
Rose Judson (podcast)
Sister Golden Bear

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Privacy Manager

Copyright © 2026 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc