This came across my feed thirty seconds ago:
Hrmm. I wonder if anyone else has had this unique insight? I wonder what Google News says…
I seriously need to remove some people from my twitter feed.
Archives for 2009
And McCain is Done
Mr. Wrong About Everything, Bill Kristol, signs his political death certificate:
The new Rasmussen poll for the 2010 Arizona GOP Primary—John McCain 45%, J. D. Hayworth 43%—will generate a fair amount of buzz. But August is a long way away, and I assume that when McCain gets back to Arizona and campaigns, he’ll pull it out.
I hear McCain will be greeted with flowers and the primary will pay for itself.
I Need More than 140 Characters
Mein GOTT twitter is frustrating:
Yeah, the problem here is Obama has not reached out enough.
Some of these guys never learn anything, ever. John McCain has never been a maverick. He has never been a major player in legislation- his only signature bill is McCain/Feingold, and that is due in large part out of guilt and an effort to rehabilitate himself (Keating Five, anyone?). He flips and flops depending on what is best for him, personally, at that very moment, and some talking head somewhere will excuse his lack of consistency as “John McCain being a maverick” or “John McCain being John McCain” or some other nonsense. For chrissakes, he put Palin in a position where she could have been a heartbeat away from the Presidency. That alone should tell you that John McCain is in it for himself, and himself only. That is all he cares about.
So put two and two together, guys. John McCain is looking at a very tough primary against Hayworth and Simcox, a Minuteman, and he senses he needs to run to the right to shore up his flank. The Obama White House didn’t “lose” John McCain, John McCain is just doing what he always does- looking out for himself.
In fact, you can almost bet that the next couple of months leading up to his primary, McCain will step up his criticisms of Obama, will become louder and more vocal and more strident, and will move to the right of his past stated positions and his alleged “core beliefs.” And you know what else you can bet on?
Some beltway bobblehead looking at McCain’s behavior and wondering- “Gee, what did the Obama administration do to piss off John McCain?”
Nothing Bad Can Happen
In January, Mike Rowland was so broke that he had to raid his retirement savings to move here from Boston.
A week ago, he and a couple of buddies bought a two-unit apartment building for nearly a million dollars. They had only a little cash to bring to the table but, with the federal government insuring the transaction, a large down payment was not necessary.
“It was kind of crazy we could get this big a loan,” said Mr. Rowland, 27. “If a government official came out here, I would slap him a high-five.”
In its efforts to prop up a shattered housing market, the government is greatly extending its traditional support of real estate, including guaranteeing the mortgages of middle-class and even upper-class buyers against default.
Personally, I would just slap the person responsible for this.
Limiting the Mania
I really don’t see what other options the military has here:
Sarah Palin kicked off her book tour in Michigan this week, and thousands gathered outside a Barnes & Noble chanting her name, giving the event the feel of a political pep rally. The Army wants Palin’s appearance at Fort Bragg on Monday to be much quieter.
The base has asked Palin not to make a speech at a public book-signing at the base exchange; she also will not write personal notes, pose for photographs or sign anything besides her new memoir, “Going Rogue: An American Life.”
Fort Bragg also wanted to bar reporters from the event. Garrison Commander Col. Stephen J. Sicinski determined that by keeping out the media, the base would prevent Palin, a Republican and possible candidate in 2012, from having a platform from which to attack President Barack Obama, a Democrat.
“Fort Bragg, nor any other Army installation, cannot be used or appear to be used as endorsing criticism of the commander in chief,” said base spokesman Thomas D. McCollum. “Because this book signing is turning into a political platform with the addition of media coverage, we are restricting the media coverage.”
They really don’t have much choice in this matter.
Another Round of Cancer Screening Craziness
From the NY Times:
New guidelines for cervical cancer screening say women should delay their first Pap test until age 21, and be screened less often than recommended in the past.
The advice, from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, is meant to decrease unnecessary testing and potentially harmful treatment, particularly in teenagers and young women. The group’s previous guidelines had recommended yearly testing for young women, starting within three years of their first sexual intercourse, but no later than age 21.
Arriving on the heels of hotly disputed guidelines calling for less use of mammography, the new recommendations might seem like part of a larger plan to slash cancer screening for women. But the timing was coincidental, said Dr. Cheryl B. Iglesia, the chairwoman of a panel in the obstetricians’ group that developed the Pap smear guidelines. The group updates its advice regularly based on new medical information, and Dr. Iglesia said the latest recommendations had been in the works for several years, “long before the Obama health plan came into existence.”
There was actually a really good piece on NPR yesterday about the decisions behind the breast-screening guideline changes that explained the reasons for the change in the guidelines. According to one of the doctors, the problem people are having understanding the reasoning for the guidelines is that the statistics are saying something that is counter-intuitive and goes against our long-held belief that earlier detection is better in regards to cancer. Here is the relevant snippet:
BLOCK: We have been getting a lot of email from listeners, as you might imagine. And a number of people have stories of their own. And I want to read a couple of those letters. This is one from Wendy Hickey(ph) of Pittsburgh who says that three years ago when she was 45, a mammogram identified suspicious tissue in her breast. She had a needle biopsy excisional surgery and is now cancer-free, taking daily tamoxifen.
And Ms. Hickey writes: I can’t imagine what would have happened if I had delayed my mammogram for five more years. But I feel safe in guessing that the outcome and treatment would not have been as positive.
Dr. Lerner, what would you say to Wendy Hickey about that?
Dr. LERNER: If people can take away from this show the notion that what she’s saying may be true but may not be true, I think they would learn a lot.
What the data is showing us is that this woman, even though the mammogram found the suspicious cells early on, the argument is that her overall prognosis would not have changed. She would have gotten treated then as aggressively or more aggressively as when it was found by mammogram, and she would have done exactly the same.
That’s what the point is of this data. It’s hard conceptual leap for people to make, even for a doctor, but that’s what the data show.
BLOCK: And you would assume though that the earlier you find something, the better your results would be.
Dr. LERNER: That has been the guiding principle of cancer research since the early 20th century, but the data for some cancer shows that things are not that simple, and that’s what we’re trying to deal with now.
You can listen to the whole piece here. I thought it was interesting and worth the time.
Another Round of Cancer Screening CrazinessPost + Comments (105)
Yet Another Open Thread: Thursday Night Menu
I forgot to post the recipe for the weekend:
1. Marinated Chicken w/flaming pineapples
2. Cuban Black Beans & Rice
3. Ensalada Cubana
4. Fried Plantain
Also, I need someone with mad photoshop skills for a “big” job involving a cat and a Bengals uniform. The innocents always suffer the most.
Yet Another Open Thread: Thursday Night MenuPost + Comments (124)