Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Thanks to your bullshit, we are now under siege.

“Everybody’s entitled to be an idiot.”

JFC, are there no editors left at that goddamn rag?

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

We cannot abandon the truth and remain a free nation.

If you’re pissed about Biden’s speech, he was talking about you.

A snarling mass of vitriolic jackals

Take hopelessness and turn it into resilience.

We are aware of all internet traditions.

Nancy smash is sick of your bullshit.

Battle won, war still ongoing.

Reality always lies in wait for … Democrats.

I’d try pessimism, but it probably wouldn’t work.

We’ve had enough carrots to last a lifetime. break out the sticks.

Just because you believe it, that doesn’t make it true.

The poor and middle-class pay taxes, the rich pay accountants, the wealthy pay politicians.

I really should read my own blog.

The worst democrat is better than the best republican.

I did not have telepathic declassification on my 2022 bingo card.

Conservatism: there are some people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

Shallow, uninformed, and lacking identity

Eh, that’s media spin. biden’s health is fine and he’s doing a good job.

I see no possible difficulties whatsoever with this fool-proof plan.

Let me eat cake. The rest of you could stand to lose some weight, frankly.

You are here: Home / Economics / The Party of Fiscal Responsibility / The Hills are Alive

The Hills are Alive

by | 22 Comments

This post is in: 

Today’s New York Times reports that FEMA trailers have re-appeared in the Gulf as a source of cheap housing for oil spill cleanup workers. Because the trailers were constructed with cheap materials, they have unsafe levels of formaldehyde.

That’s not the only place those things have landed. I’m traveling in the Dakotas and the hills on the reservations are dotted with these things. The GSA says they’re for “recreational use”, but the tribes who received them weren’t told that. They made the reasonable assumption that the government wouldn’t truck trailers from Texas as vacation homes for some of the poorest people in the US.

Reader Interactions

22Comments

  1. 1.

    frankdawg

    SEE! They are not so poor! THEY get vacation homes, I work for a living and I can’t afford a vacation home!

    These big bucks are eating T-bone steaks on all those handouts & enjoying a vacation home in the hills while I toil away to put food on my family & get raped by the tax collecting salve master.

    GATHER YOUR ARMIES!

  3. 3.

    c u n d gulag

    For ‘recreational use?’
    They’re supposed to smoke a FEMA trailer?
    Just don’t inhale, it’ll kill ya…

  5. 5.

    cleek

    The GSA says they’re for “recreational use”, but the tribes who received them weren’t told that.

    that’s not what the article says.

    U.S. General Services Administration officials say the FEMA trailers are intended for recreational use and not for housing.
    …
    They say tribal officials were made aware of that.

  6. 6.

    Bella Q

    @Catherine D.:
    My thoughts exactly about the recurrence of historic events. It’s a shandah the way the US government has treated the indigenous people of this continent, from the earliest days through the present.

  8. 8.

    matoko_chan

    @Bella Q:

    It’s a shandah the way the US government has treated the indigenous people of this continent, from the earliest days through the present.

    but its the way the US government treats ALL indigenous people. Just look at those rotten ingrate Iraqis and Afghanis. If they would just accept White Jesus into their lives they wouldn’t have to die all the time.
    ;)

  9. 9.

    Cat Lady

    Those things would be a vast improvement over anything in Rapid City. Just sayin’.

  10. 10.

    ET

    The US government has a history of giving Native Americans products like blankets that kill them at worse or just make them real sick at best, so somehow this doesn’t come much of a surprise.

  11. 11.

    sukabi

    why didn’t FEMA change contractors and insist on safe materials for these trailers they are buying, and get rid of the toxic ones that were used during Katrina? Why after 4 years of knowingly making folks sick are these trailers still being used? And why isn’t anyone doing anything about it besides saying “They’re for recreational use?”… wouldn’t the assumption that anything FEMA sends out for use be safe for you know — actual use.

  12. 12.

    Brachiator

    @ET:
    Here is the part of the story that makes my head hurt:

    But federal officials have struggled to figure out what to do with the contaminated trailers, which have cost nearly $130 million a year to store and maintain, according to federal records. As a result, the government decided to sell the trailers in 2006.

    So instead of dismantling these crappy trailers and finding a way to dispose of them responsibly, we got government paper pushers selling the damn things to used car salesmen, who are obviously always to be commended for their honesty and commitment to public safety.

    It pisses me off to no end that anyone is living in these things, whether Native Americans or oil workers who may have already been exposed to toxic chemicals.

  13. 13.

    scav

    @Brachiator: Obvious. They’re following the path blazed by bankers, who also aren’t getting rid of (and trying to sell) toxic “assets” — coincidentally, they’re houses in both instances.

  14. 14.

    MattR

    Travelling in the Dakotas, eh? make sure to check out the world’s largest Buffalo in Jamestown, ND

  15. 15.

    Brachiator

    @scav:

    Obvious. They’re following the path blazed by bankers, who also aren’t getting rid of (and trying to sell) toxic “assets” — coincidentally, they’re houses in both instances.

    No, this is more the stupid part of the government at work, not thinking creatively to avoid a problem. I know that Obama and his folks have a lot on their plate, but the FEMA people should have been thinking about how to dispose of the crappy trailers, not how to store them, and coming up with stupid pseudo-regulations about how much poisoning is acceptable.

    By the way, some people I commute with work for a company that makes batteries for a range of uses, including batteries used in RVs. They noted that because of the downturn in the economy and other reasons, there has been a huuuuuuge plunge in the sale of RVs, trailers, and mobile homes over the past few years.

    I wonder if someone was trying to throw a bone to the industry by allowing the resale of these crappy trailers.

    But no matter the reason, the initial bad decision was in trying to hold onto this stuff instead of just cutting their losses.

  16. 16.

    Ruckus

    @Brachiator:
    But no matter the reason, the initial bad decision was in trying to hold onto this stuff instead of just cutting their losses.
    Isn’t that the way a lot (most?) large organizations work? No one in middle or upper management will admit they screwed up, and someone somewhere is in charge of the project. If they take a loss it usually means someone has to fall with the loss. Shit may roll downhill gathering bodies on the way, but when it explodes instead of rolls, everyone gets covered.

  17. 17.

    mistermix

    @cleek:

    Cree, who has been researching the concerns with the FEMA travel trailers and FEMA mobile homes for about two months, said he recently accompanied relatives to a lot in Purvis, Miss. He said the lot had about 60 trailers designated for the Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa, where his relatives obtained a travel trailer and brought it back to the reservation. When his relatives picked up the travel trailer at the lot, he said no documents were presented stating there were possible health concerns and/or health hazards. He said a sticker taped on the side window stated the trailer is not to be used for living in but because of the rain the sticker could easily have fallen off. He said only a few of the trailers had such stickers.

    http://www.minotdailynews.com/page/content.detail/id/540592.html

  18. 18.

    Garrigus Carraig

    @cleek:

    [U.S. General Services Administration officials] say tribal officials were made aware of that.

    Oh, so it must be true.

    @matoko_chan:

    but its the way the US government treats ALL indigenous people. Just look at those rotten ingrate Iraqis and Afghanis.

    I feel dirty responding to you, but the assertion that the Iraqis are indigenous means you need to reach for a dictionary.

  19. 19.

    scav

    @Brachiator:

    But no matter the reason, the initial bad decision was in trying to hold onto this stuff instead of just cutting their losses.

    which is, as best I can tell, what a lot of banks (and other financial self-appointed smartest people in the room) are doing — certainly did. Avoided mark to market like the plague.

  20. 20.

    sukabi

    @Garrigus Carraig: they are indigenous to Iraq and Afghanistan respectively….. just as the Aboriginal peoples are indigenous to Australia…. think that’s what he meant… Unless you’re assuming that the current residents of those countries aren’t the original people of those areas…

  22. 22.

    azure

    It’s more like the feds are following in the footsteps of the chemicals industry (Dow, et al), chemical compounds developed during WWII for chemical warfare became the pesticides, insecticides & herbicides used by corporate agriculture, and home gardeners.

    Agent Orange (2,4,5 -T) was sprayed by the Forest Service on national forests & owners of private forest lands in the Pacific Northwest until people who had seen their watersheds & property (spray drift from helicopter spraying) & a substantial increase in human miscarriages & deformed offspring of domestic & wild animals successfully sued to obtain an injunction against spraying of Agent Orange on public forest lands. It wasn’t until the 1980’s that EPA finally suspended registration of 2,4,5-T and even later until the last plant manufacturing 2,4,5-T (in New Zealand) was shut down.

    When “shock & awe” was going on in Iraq, one of the few times any one thought they’d found a WMD was when a US soldier felt ill after entering some area. Turned out it was Sarin, which can be used as a chemical weapon but it’s also a precursor compound for at least one agricultural chemical. So it’s not a WMD.

    It’s thought by some that depleted uranium in ammunition & other projectiles was initiated as a way of disposing of ,well, depleted uranium. Had to get rid of it somehow, so firing it at enemies–and in the world’s oceans by the Navy during “training exercises” –was thought to be a good way of doing so. It wasn’t until 2009 or early 2010 that the Navy announced that it would stop using depleted uranium in its training exercises.

    So, for all those Iraqi & other civilians in areas where depleted uranium was in the ammunition, shells, etc., and all the soldiers who were exposed, oh well.

    And then there’s the various solvents used in jet engine maintenance that the Air Force let flow/go anywhere from the 1960’s, on . . .

    Some tribal councils agree to store radioactive waste on reservation land.

Comments are closed.