• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty. ~Thomas Jefferson

No Kings: Americans standing in the way of bad history saying “Oh, Fuck No!”

In after Baud. Damn.

A norm that restrains only one side really is not a norm – it is a trap.

I did not have this on my fuck 2025 bingo card.

My years-long effort to drive family and friends away has really paid off this year.

They think we are photo bombing their nice little lives.

Republicans do not trust women.

They are lying in pursuit of an agenda.

Bark louder, little dog.

The Supreme Court cannot be allowed to become the ultimate, unaccountable arbiter of everything.

I would try pessimism, but it probably wouldn’t work.

Hell hath no fury like a farmer bankrupted.

Every one of the “Roberts Six” lied to get on the court.

Take hopelessness and turn it into resilience.

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

rich, arrogant assholes who equate luck with genius

Let the trolls come, and then ignore them. that’s the worst thing you can do to a troll.

If you still can’t see these things even now, maybe politics isn’t your forte and you should stop writing about it.

Pessimism assures that nothing of any importance will change.

If rights aren’t universal, they are privilege, not rights.

75% of people clapping liked the show!

Republicans choose power over democracy, every day.

“Jesus paying for the sins of everyone is an insult to those who paid for their own sins.”

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Education / The Flip Side of MBA Superintendents

The Flip Side of MBA Superintendents

by @heymistermix.com|  April 24, 20119:52 am| 47 Comments

This post is in: Education, Decline and Fall

FacebookTweetEmail

The many shortcomings of Galtian superhero school superintendents like Michelle Rhee are well-documented, but part of the reason that we get this kind of superintendent is that the “educational professional” alternative is no better. The experience of the city school district in Rochester is a great case in point.

Last week, we lost the latest in a list of mediocre scam artist superintendents in our urban school district. This one’s name is Jean-Claude Brizard, who ditched his contract to go run Chicago’s schools. Chicago apparently wasn’t fazed about the Rochester teacher’s union 95% vote of no confidence. As the top-notch local reporter Rachel Barnhart documents, Brizard’s tenure was full of bureaucratic waste, bullshitting about graduation rates, and no real improvement in the school district’s status.

The previous full-time superintendent before Brizard, Clifford Janey, went on to become Michelle Rhee’s predecessor. Janey recently quit his $280K/year post in Newark, a job he got after being fired in DC. Janey’s tenure at Rochester was similar to his experience in DC and Newark: a lot of empty promises about change as graduation rates fell.

I can’t really blame these grifters for running their cons in Rochester, Chicago, Newark and DC, because those places were on a quest for Superintendent Chocolate Jesus. Instead of addressing or even acknowledging the underlying reasons for school failure (structural poverty, no job opportunities, crime, drugs, teen pregancy and neglectful parenting), they put all their hopes into an out-of-town savior who can dream up unrealistic programs with the help of overpaid consultants, giving them asinine names like “Great Expectations”.

Rochester did have a decent interim superintendent for a year or two. His name is Bill Cala, and he came out of retirement after running a high quality suburban district to run the city schools for a couple of years. His speech about poverty, inequality and education contains a number of home truths that will almost certainly be glossed over by the next con artist with an Ed.D. who is hired to preside over our urban failure.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Another Questionable Tale of Resurrection
Next Post: Here Is A Barrel of Fish, for Your Shooting »

Reader Interactions

47Comments

  1. 1.

    E.D. Kain

    April 24, 2011 at 9:58 am

    Very well said mistermix.

  2. 2.

    mellowjohn

    April 24, 2011 at 10:02 am

    as a chicago teacher, i’m fazed as hell about the brizard choice. but i’d almost be willing to bet that he never shows up here. rahm doesn’t strike me as somebody who readily admits mistakes, but with all the shit coming out about j-c, i won’t be surprised if he quietly “withdraws his name.”

  3. 3.

    Ron

    April 24, 2011 at 10:07 am

    I think part of the problem is that the superintendent cannot fix many of the problems that Rochester has. As long as those structural problems you mentioned exist, I don’t see how anyone can do anything other than effectively trying to patch up a severed artery with some bandaids. The best they can do is acknowledge where the problems lie and use that to understand where the kids are coming from. Don’t think anyone can change the fundamental problems from the schools. I have a student that spent some time with a teacher at a school in Rochester (I’m not sure about the name but “Edison” comes to mind) and the situation she described was just awful.

  4. 4.

    Phoebe

    April 24, 2011 at 10:12 am

    giving them asinine names like “Great Expectations”.

    I know that wasn’t the point of the post, but it was the part for which I was most grateful. And the Bill Cala link was suh-weet (frat boy pron. “sweet”).

  5. 5.

    Aaron S. Veenstra

    April 24, 2011 at 10:16 am

    Chicago apparently wasn’t fazed about the Rochester teacher’s union 95% vote of no confidence.

    It was probably a point in Brizard’s favor — he won’t give in to the union so teachers hate him, he must be great!

  6. 6.

    jeff

    April 24, 2011 at 10:18 am

    Clifford Janey’s performance in Washington, DC is not how you describe it. Janey was actually taking a fairly comprehensive approach toward reform. The knock on him was that he was moving too slow. There was a strong preference in some quarters to achieve an overnight miracle — hence the popularity of Michelle Rhee. Janey was taking smaller, but more effective steps. Janey’s efforts led to text books being delivered on time for the first time in recent memory and an increase in test scores. You could say that Janey was fired precisely because he wasn’t a chocolate Jesus.

    I don’t know what he did after leaving DC, but I thought his performance here was commendable.

  7. 7.

    Murc

    April 24, 2011 at 10:21 am

    @Ron:

    You have a student who made it out of Edison with their mind and body intact? They were, without a doubt, one of the lucky ones. My mother taught at Edison for five years and it would have driven a lesser woman to drink.

  8. 8.

    Ron

    April 24, 2011 at 10:33 am

    @Murc: She was basically doing a 4 week period of shadowing some teachers. Reading her journal of that time was truly scary.

  9. 9.

    Chris

    April 24, 2011 at 10:36 am

    Ha — Anyone who would use Great Expectations as his motto obviously hasn’t read the book.

  10. 10.

    Scooter Pie

    April 24, 2011 at 10:37 am

    Our local superintendent is an accountant. He runs the district like any good MBA’er: destroy the complex, family-like support structures that high-poverty schools built over years to help the neediest of children and bring in young “reformers” who don’t know what the hell they are doing.

    He fired all the long-term principals last year and replaced them with new 30-something Rhee-like disciples that are so lost that they will never be found again in daylight. Scores go down. Teachers are below discouraged and are fleeing in droves. Kids still suffer. And the beat goes on!

    If only children and the educational process would conform to business voodoo like a profit/loss statement and all the superior Midas touch of increased productivity. . . .

  11. 11.

    Dan B

    April 24, 2011 at 10:57 am

    Brizard’s time here was a joke, and Chicago will get what it deserves for hiring him. Superintendent is yet another in a long line of jobs where the worst candidates always seem to fail upward.

    EDIT: Then, about 10 seconds later, I click onto Atrios’ site and he made the same “failing upward” comment.

  12. 12.

    angler

    April 24, 2011 at 11:31 am

    Thanks for the link. Cala makes excellent points about the impossibility of the schools solving the problems of poverty and he lists all the problems of poverty as exacerbated by wealth inequality.

    To see what a steep hill there is to climb check the comments by representative “I got mine, f you” suburbanites who call Cala a socialist. The logic runs that because Cala as an educator did not open a job-creating factory like Bill Gates fingers will be put in ears. Cue the next Gates Foundation plan for charters getting taxpayer dough.

  13. 13.

    christian h.

    April 24, 2011 at 12:02 pm

    Clearly as has been pointed out for Rahm the fact that teachers hate the guy is a feature, not a bug. All these baffling hires become understandable once you give up the idea that those who do the hiring care about kids or learning in the least. They don’t. The goal of real-existing school reform is to privatize one of the last remaining public sector enterprises of any size;and in the process crush the unions in that sector. Anything else is incidental.

  14. 14.

    Karen

    April 24, 2011 at 12:04 pm

    What exactly is Galtian? I see that description all the time but I’ve come to equate it with evil, soulless people who would sell children to pedophiles if ordered to by big business and the GOP.

    I live in Silver Spring, MD and have seen Michelle Rhee in the news, usually with parents either praising her or despising her. I admit, I don’t know the full story of Michelle Rhee but I believe that she did mean to make a difference. Something has to be done because a lot of the public schools in DC are a war zone. Also, less kids are graduating. I believe in charter schools and magnet schools (like Blair High School in Silver Spring, MD who have had Westinghouse award winners in scientific inventions).

    Maybe Adrian Fenty is Galtian too since after he lost the election, Michelle Rhee got out of Dodge.

    I do think there’s a big problem with DC public schools. If you feel charter schools and magnet schools are Galtian then where should the gifted students go? Where should the students go that actually want to be in school?

  15. 15.

    sukabi

    April 24, 2011 at 12:06 pm

    so I’ve got a question… who exactly is responsible for hiring school superintendents? The faculty and citizenry don’t have a vote in it… is it the school board’s decision?

    from doing a quick google search, it appears that the hiring may be a mostly hidden political process.. and if that’s the case, then all these “failing upward” superintendents aren’t an accident.

  16. 16.

    Aimai

    April 24, 2011 at 12:20 pm

    Karen that’s a false dichotomy. All the kids deserve to be in good schools where they are wanted, welcomed, and taught. The idea that there are gifted kids who deserve a publicly financed private education away from those loser non gifted kids is absurd. Until we’ve successfully delivered theveducation that all the kids need to the greatest number the whole charter school thing is just a bait and switch.
    Aimai

  17. 17.

    Aimai

    April 24, 2011 at 12:20 pm

    Karen that’s a false dichotomy. All the kids deserve to be in good schools where they are wanted, welcomed, and taught. The idea that there are gifted kids who deserve a publicly financed private education away from those loser non gifted kids is absurd. Until we’ve successfully delivered theveducation that all the kids need to the greatest number the whole charter school thing is just a bait and switch.
    Aimai

  18. 18.

    saucy

    April 24, 2011 at 12:20 pm

    Thanks for this post. The superintendent carousel is an issue that needs much more attention. I would like to see more superintendents like Bill Cala who focus on the root socioeconomic issues affecting educational quality and fewer like Rhee and Brizard who simply blame teachers. Teachers matter enormously, but we’ll never repair the failing schools of DC or Chicago just by focusing on teachers.

    Ending local funding of schools — not curricular control, just funding — would be a good start. It’s morally reprehensible that elementary schools are vastly better in wealthy areas than in poor ones. Some part of that difference in quality really does come down to dollars.

  19. 19.

    Bill Murray

    April 24, 2011 at 12:22 pm

    @Karen: Galtian refers to John Galt the hero of Ayn Rand’s book Atlas Shrugged. Galtian Overlords are basically people that have large amounts of money and think this means they are the best and brightest and that the world (and the country’s laws) should revolve around them and their concerns.

    Unfortunately what Rhee mostly appears to have done is to fake a bunch of data to make herself look better

  20. 20.

    ornery curmudgeon

    April 24, 2011 at 12:43 pm

    @Aimai: “All the kids deserve to be in good schools where they are wanted, welcomed, and taught. The idea that there are gifted kids who deserve a publicly financed private education away from those loser non gifted kids is absurd.”

    It sounds so good, Aimai, and many would nod their heads in agreement … if you could hear such nice words over the overaged lout lobbing spitballs at the engaged students we dismissively call ‘teacher’s pet’ book’worm’ or ‘nerd.’

    I say it’s time to deliver the education that best suits the students: and some students actually ARE better than others. That’s not to say all kids should not be educated, but some kids simply don’t cherish the learning if given any other avenue. IMO ignoring the bookish top end in favor of the sneering middling has only given us rule by the underachieving bullies.

    Give the best to the academic achievers and maybe academic achievement will become something valued in our society … this constant catering to the below average IS NOT WORKING.

    I have great faith in the human spirit, you see, and believe teachers and quality education is worth more than the benighted self-esteem project America has foundered upon. Mix in an establishment mindset that seeks to close minds and create a stupid populace, and this play to the middle has been an unholy disaster.

  21. 21.

    James E. Powell

    April 24, 2011 at 12:47 pm

    @Aaron S. Veenstra:

    It was probably a point in Brizard’s favor—he won’t give in to the union so teachers hate him, he must be great!

    Hating unions and being hated by teachers are prerequisites for seriousness in education reform.

  22. 22.

    Bostondreams

    April 24, 2011 at 12:51 pm

    @Karen:

    Karen, considering that the majority of charter schools as bad as or WORSE than traditional public schools, your support makes little sense. You have bought into the myth propagated by Rhee and her ilk that these schools are the cure-all, and they simply are not.

  23. 23.

    sukabi

    April 24, 2011 at 12:52 pm

    @ornery curmudgeon: I think aimai’s argument was for quality education in the SAME SCHOOL, not necessarily in the same class room, and to not segregate children into different schools based on aptitude.

  24. 24.

    athena2

    April 24, 2011 at 12:58 pm

    Charter schools are a scam. I have yet to see evidence that they do any better than any other school organized on a similar scale.

  25. 25.

    sukabi

    April 24, 2011 at 1:12 pm

    @sukabi: adding to my comment above, that the reason public education is in such miserable shape, is due to politicians wanting to institute a way to “measure” progress… ie, standardized testing…

    school programs have been totally gutted to “teach for the test”, and only those topics that can be easily “measured” are focused on, to the exclusion of everything else…

    EVERYBODY suffers in this case… the kids, both the over and under achievers get short changed because the focus is on the specifics of The Test and making sure all students score well. The teachers are judged not on how well they can teach or inspire students to learn, but on how well they can train students to do specific, measurable tasks.

    It’s no wonder that dropout rates have gone through the roof, everybody knows when they aren’t being respected, and this system of “testing” is as insulting to the kids as it is to the teachers implementing it.

  26. 26.

    iriedc

    April 24, 2011 at 1:14 pm

    @jeff: You’re right about Janey. He had his faults, but doesn’t belong in the same grifter class as Rhee. BTW — I was a Rhee supporter initially, and am still pissed I let myself be persuaded by her and her promoters. I’ll add that a lot of local DC Ed Reformers I cross paths with can’t stand Rhee, but won’t say so publicly.

  27. 27.

    iriedc

    April 24, 2011 at 1:16 pm

    @athena2: All charter schools are not a scam. Saying so as a Dem, supporter of collective bargining, child of a teacher, AND charter school parent.

  28. 28.

    JGabriel

    April 24, 2011 at 1:40 pm

    @Aaron S. Veenstra:

    It was probably a point in Brizard’s favor—he won’t give in to the union so teachers hate him, he must be great!

    Maybe that would be true in Indiana or Alabama, but Chicago and Illinois aren’t exactly known as centers of anti-unionism.

    .

  29. 29.

    sukabi

    April 24, 2011 at 1:44 pm

    @iriedc: give it a couple of years… most “problems” don’t start to publicly manifest for a while… they fester under a shroud of secrecy until they’re too big to hide.

    If you’re convinced your kids are in a “good charter school” then ask to see the funding / grade criteria / rate of graduation stats, ect… most of the school / student stats are cooked by removing or reclassifying students who are “under performing”.

    your definition of a scam may vary, but if they are “cooking” the stats, then they are a scam.

  30. 30.

    iriedc

    April 24, 2011 at 2:03 pm

    @sukabi: I’ve seen the scores. The charter school the kids are in has a stellar reputation for openness about the stats — including being frank about the test scores “achievement gap”. In fact, some parents have tried to persuade the school to reclassify and give alternate test to Special Ed students. The leaders of the school will not, and so the test scores have NOT experienced the “miracle” improvements you hear about from other local neighborhood and charter schools. Instead, we’ve have slow steady improvement in the scores and the curricula. It’s representative of many of the smaller, non-corporate Charters in DC which are solid, even stellar.

  31. 31.

    PopeRatzo

    April 24, 2011 at 3:27 pm

    @mellowjohn: Mayor-elect Rahm will never admit to making such a serious mistake before he’s even sworn in.

    No, we’re going to have to live with this Brizard con-man for at least a year or so.

    Rahm is off to a rocky start as mayor, that’s for sure. I’m surprised that he brought out the anti-union schtick so fast. Chicago might be Rahm’s “home” but he’s still got a lot to learn about this town.

  32. 32.

    Karen

    April 24, 2011 at 4:34 pm

    @Aimai:

    Karen that’s a false dichotomy. All the kids deserve to be in good schools where they are wanted, welcomed, and taught. The idea that there are gifted kids who deserve a publicly financed private education away from those loser non gifted kids is absurd. Until we’ve successfully delivered theveducation that all the kids need to the greatest number the whole charter school thing is just a bait and switch.

    Are you saying that the idea that there are gifted students is a scam?

    Everyone deserves a great education. I agree there. But I didn’t mention anything about private school, that’s your assumption.

    Are you saying that magnet schools are a scam?

    Montgomery Blair High School

    To quote them:

    In 1985, Montgomery County Public Schools opened its Science, Mathematics, and Computer Science Magnet Program within Montgomery Blair High School in Silver Spring, Maryland. The Magnet Program is designed to offer accelerated, interdisciplinary courses in science, mathematics, and computer science for highly able students particularly interested in these subjects.

    Since Magnet students have a number of extra academic requirements, magnet students have an eight-period day, instead of the normal seven-period day of most county high school students. Magnet students can (and do!) take full advantage of Blair’s other extracurriculars such as athletics, student clubs, the school’s bands and plays, and other activities.

    Are you saying those shouldn’t exist either?

    Or is your point that since bad grades are because of bad schools, the idea that anyone is gifted or has high grades is a scam.

    You don’t believe in gifted students so you probably don’t believe in talented kids either.

    Is Duke Ellington School of the Arts in DC also a scam? Should they take everyone? After all, by your reasoning, by only taking talented students they’re leaving behind the other “losers” (your word not mine) at schools that don’t have the music department nor the drama department that this school has.

    Are the kids who “deserve to be in good schools where they are wanted, welcomed, and taught” only heterosexual? How about the GLBT kids who are bullied (by teachers as well as kids)?

    The Harvey Milk High School in NY city is high school where GLBT can go to school in a supportive environment. With the logic you use, until all schools are gay friendly, these kids should remain where they’re abused.

    I want everyone to get a great education. But I also believe that there are kids that have more potential than others or special needs than others and to say that the schools that fulfil their needs shouldn’t exist is short-sighted and unfair.

  33. 33.

    Kobie

    April 24, 2011 at 6:04 pm

    Brizard’s unpopularity with the teacher’s union is CLEARLY why he was a top candidate for the Chicago job.

    And good riddance to bad trash. The guy was a fucking awful superintendent.

  34. 34.

    mclaren

    April 24, 2011 at 6:45 pm

    This interview with David Simon, producer and one of the writers of the HBO show The Wire, says it all:

    One of the themes of The Wire really was that statistics will always lie. Statistics can be made to say anything. You show me anything that depicts institutional progress in America: school test scores, crime stats, arrest reports, anything that a politician can run on, anything that somebody can get a promotion on, and as soon as you invent that statistical category, fifty people in that institution will be at work trying to figure out a way to make it look as if progress is actually occurring when actually no progress is. I mean, our entire economic structure fell behind the idea that these mortgage-backed securities were actually valuable, and they had absolutely no value. They were toxic. And yet they were being traded and being hurled about, because somebody could make some short-term profit. In the same way that a police commissioner or a deputy commissioner can get promoted, and a major can become a colonel, and an assistant school superintendent can become a school superintendent, if they make it look like the kids are learning and that they’re solving crime.

  35. 35.

    sukabi

    April 24, 2011 at 6:57 pm

    @Karen: way to shift the focus of what aimia was saying… learn to read sarcasm / snark.

    The idea that there are gifted kids who deserve a publicly financed private education away from those loser non gifted kids is absurd.

    She’s clearly saying she doesn’t have any problem with PRIVATE education. What she has a problem with is taking PUBLIC TAX MONEY away from public schools to fund PRIVATE charter schools. If you want to send your kids to a private school, fine pay for it yourself. Just don’t expect the public via tax monies to finance your kids education at a private facility over their own kids education at a public school.

    And that is most of the problem with these “charter schools” and “vouchers”… they take huge amounts of tax payer money to fund PRIVATE schools, that

    1) have no intention of enrolling students that aren’t “up to their standards” , ie they “cherry pick” students to skew their “scholastic numbers”

    2) contribute to the underfunding and failure of the public school system, which leads to further underfunding… creating a downward spiral that will be near impossible to correct.

    3) and don’t have any requirements to meet to show they are performing at least at the same level as the public schools they are “replacing”.

  36. 36.

    Commenting at Ballon Juice since 1937

    April 24, 2011 at 8:03 pm

    This post nails Brizard perfectly. I watched him lie about his commitment to Rochester one week before announcing moving to Chicago. People like him are scum.

  37. 37.

    Morat20

    April 24, 2011 at 9:04 pm

    Superintendents are hired by school boards.

    School boards are a collection of people elected in a small election in which few people vote, and most of those don’t know who they’re voting for.

    The people who run for school board positions tend to either care very much about the education of children (whether they have relevent experience, understanding, or the competence to be in such a position is, of course, a crap shoot due to the small elections) or tend to have a serious idealogical axe to grind.

    I watched my local school board for a period of about 6 years. A friend of mine’s father was the head of the board during that time period, and I watched it during the back half of high school and during my bachelor’s to get an idea of how local politics works.

    During four of those six years, we had a group of religious nutcases whose children attended private religious schools spend at least 30 minutes per meeting trying to get Creationism taught. They were one vote short for all four years of being able to do untold damage.

    I watched mailers going out accusing school board members of wanting to teach kindergarten children to masturbate, flyers accusing members of being ‘in league with Clinton’ and generally every level of villiany and dirty politics you can imagine.

    And it’s these guys that choose the superintendent.

    If you want a feel for how small the votes are — I personally watched a school board member in our district lose a seat she’d held for almost 8 years entirely due to pissing off a single substitute teacher.

    Said teacher happened to be related to a few key individuals, who between their workplaces (including the local high school and the district-wide fine arts program) and their church managed to spread word of what had happend.

    The lady lost the seat because she tried to throw her weight around to intimidate a sub into withdrawing a discipline action against her kid. She didn’t lose by much. But she lost.

    The entire vote totals for a town of 30,000 plus? Something like 500 to 480.

    (Said kid had skipped class. Sub noted it, turned it in, kid had skipped too many days, when straight into suspension. School board member shows up that afternoon, tries to get sub to admit she ‘made a mistake’ and that the little angel had, in fact, been in class).

  38. 38.

    gelfling545

    April 24, 2011 at 9:31 pm

    In Rochester, Chicago & here in Buffalo are there serious educators who really WANT the job of superintendent? These schools have issues that have become ingrained over decades and School Boards are effectively asking for a miracle worker. When no honest administrator will promise them that (or even consider applying) they find themselves someone willing to lie to them.

  39. 39.

    mellowjohn

    April 24, 2011 at 10:22 pm

    @Morat20:
    in chicago, the school CEO (not called the superintendent!) is chosen be the mayor. as are members of the board of ed.

  40. 40.

    Tim Furman

    April 24, 2011 at 10:58 pm

    Hey, thanks for writing this post. The Obama administration has co-opted an extremely right-wing, pro-privatization, pro-testing school agenda, and those of us who write primarily about ed policy sometimes wonder why it’s gone basically unreported in the blogosphere. More people need to shedding some light on these Eli Broad bought-and-paid-for superintendents, as well as the Democratic lawmakers who have sold out the idea of a free, comprehensive public education in favor of some bizarre corporate model of “accountability” that doesn’t exist in any successful nation’s schools. Rock on.

  41. 41.

    socratic_me

    April 25, 2011 at 12:06 am

    @iriedc: All charter schools are not a scam.

    My response to this is slightly different that that given by others.

    Saying not all charter schools are a scam misses the point. Not all public schools are a scam. But studies have shown that, on the whole, public schools are more likely to give as good as or better education to a wider variety of students. Your experience with an excellent charter is no more powerful an indicator than my experience with several different excellent public schools.

  42. 42.

    Comrade Luke

    April 25, 2011 at 1:12 am

    The local (Seattle) news just reported that the Seattle school superintendent (Goodlow-Johnson is her name) who got fired a couple of months ago is a finalist for the same role in Newark.

    It just continues.

  43. 43.

    sukabi

    April 25, 2011 at 2:15 am

    @Comrade Luke: She came from the Charleston, SC school district where my sister worked a couple of years ago… Goodlow-Johnson was a nightmare, know nothing and caused lots of problems for the district before she was asked to leave and found greener pastures in Seattle…

  44. 44.

    grooft

    April 25, 2011 at 8:15 am

    @Karen: A: to the suburbs. Bethesda if you are rich enough or Fairfax if less rich but still rich enough.

    Rhee brought scores up by keeping more higher socio-economic parents in the public school system, proving that they could be served in DC. This may have temporarily broken the cycle of out-migration to the suburbs of parents in the elementary school years.

    A newly renovated high school is opening one grade at a time in DC (Eastern H.S.) this year. We’ll see if they are successful in luring the the parents from highly educated households to send their children to the beautiful new school that will probably by over 80 percent minority. The percentage of ‘free and reduced lunch’ recipients is the best predictor of whether this school will succeed.

    The tipping point on F&RL is around 35-40 percent; racial mix tipping point is uncertain, but less than 20% white doesn’t bode well. Race is a proxy for educational attainment and socio economic class. It may not be accurate, but is the most available data and easiest one to use.

  45. 45.

    jerry 101

    April 25, 2011 at 11:59 am

    What all the kerfluffle about Brizard misses is the fact that Chicago has made slow, steady, year-in, year-out progress in improving outcomes. 4 year graduation rates for incoming freshman 10 years ago, up through the most recent freshman class to graduate (class of 2010) showed marked improvement.

    About 49% back in 2004. A point or two of improvement each year, with 2010’s class achieving a rate of 56%. At the same time, high school enrollment has increased substantially. Drop-out rates have fallen.

    The students, teachers, and administrators in Chicago have quietly made significant improvements in outcomes. Having a few thousand more kids leave school with a diploma in hand each year is the best outcome that could happen.

  46. 46.

    pfunk

    April 27, 2011 at 11:36 am

    @subaki – I agree with you about vouchers, but there’s no such thing as a “private charter school.” Charter schools are, by definition, public, and have to accept all students until their seats are full; if they have more applicants than seats, they hold a lottery to determine admission. As a charter school teacher I fight this misconception often! We’re not a silver bullet by any means, but we ARE working hard to make sure that we serve our students. My charter performs similarly to the local traditional public schools but offers a much smaller, college-focused environment with a close-knit community and high academic expectations. Our demographics match the neighborhood. Many of our students were expelled from a traditional school. We have a slightly higher percentage of students with special needs.

    Of course the quality of charters varies both by school and by state, but I work in one, and I can assure you that you’re wrong about them being “private.”

    So, to recap:
    *Charters are NOT private schools;
    1) charters cannot cherry-pick their students (by law);
    2) charters ARE part of the public-school system; we actually receive LESS per-pupil funding for the same students than traditional public schools do, in my state, because we don’t receive funding for transportation or building purchase/upkeep;
    3) charters can be shut down by the chartering authority if they fail to perform–if they are being allowed to be substandard, then they should be shut down. Period.

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. ginandtacos.com » Blog Archive » SNAKE OIL AND PATENT MEDICINE says:
    April 27, 2011 at 12:49 am

    […] One of my favorite blogs has a good comment on a phenomenon that has always fascinated me. It points to the prevalence of fast talking, silver tongued con artists failing in highly paid positions at the helm of failing school districts…then "failing upward" into an equally high paying gig in some other city and repeating their performance. Since urban public school districts are usually a complete disaster, you can see the natural allure of some out of town savior – "Superintendent Chocolate Jesus", as BJ delicately puts it – promising the moon and dazzling the desperate locals with bullshit. […]

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - BarcaChicago  - Off the Gunflint Trail/Boundary Waters 8
Image by BarcaChicago (7/11/25)

World Central Kitchen

Donate

Recent Comments

  • Nukular Biskits on The Ongoing Texas Tragedies (Jul 12, 2025 @ 8:55am)
  • Gvg on Saturday Morning Klown Show Open Thread: GOP Falling Into the Pit They Have Dug (Jul 12, 2025 @ 8:53am)
  • Another Scott on The Ongoing Texas Tragedies (Jul 12, 2025 @ 8:50am)
  • zhena gogolia on Saturday Morning Klown Show Open Thread: GOP Falling Into the Pit They Have Dug (Jul 12, 2025 @ 8:44am)
  • Scout211 on The Ongoing Texas Tragedies (Jul 12, 2025 @ 8:44am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
No Kings Protests June 14 2025

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Feeling Defeated?  If We Give Up, It's Game Over

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!