• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

I’m more christian than these people and i’m an atheist.

He really is that stupid.

“What are Republicans afraid of?” Everything.

The cruelty is the point; the law be damned.

“Can i answer the question? No you can not!”

“But what about the lurkers?”

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

The fight for our country is always worth it. ~Kamala Harris

One of our two political parties is a cult whose leader admires Vladimir Putin.

Everybody saw this coming.

Republicans in disarray!

I would try pessimism, but it probably wouldn’t work.

Accountability, motherfuckers.

Accused of treason; bitches about the ratings. I am in awe.

They think we are photo bombing their nice little lives.

Let’s not be the monsters we hate.

So many bastards, so little time.

We can show the world that autocracy can be defeated.

The “burn-it-down” people are good with that until they become part of the kindling.

fuckem (in honor of the late great efgoldman)

You don’t get to peddle hatred on saturday and offer condolences on sunday.

Live so that if you miss a day of work people aren’t hoping you’re dead.

Bad people in a position to do bad things will do bad things because they are bad people. End of story.

“I was told there would be no fact checking.”

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Foreign Affairs / Cameron’s Two Lies

Cameron’s Two Lies

by @heymistermix.com|  July 20, 20119:49 pm| 34 Comments

This post is in: Foreign Affairs

FacebookTweetEmail

I know very little about British politics, but I spent a lot of time watching the committee hearings yesterday and question time today.  As a fairly naive spectator, I thought that David Cameron did a decent job overall.  By “decent job”, I mean he outperformed the facts of the case by having a plausible answer for each point raised over the last few days, and he danced around the tricky spots pretty artfully. Labour leader Ed Milliband, in contrast,  did an awful job.   He tried to make a few key points but couldn’t make them crisply, and he generally had nothing like the presence and confidence that Cameron showed.  Again, I’m ignorant, but I don’t see how Labour can make any kind of a recovery with that guy running the show.

Even though Cameron did pretty well, there were two topics Cameron ducked consistently: the vetting of Andy Coulson and his personal role in discussions about the BSkyB acquisition.  On Coulson, he maintained that the Tories vetted Coulson thoroughly before hiring him, but he refused to name the firm that did it.  He also claimed that Coulson received a standard vetting upon being hired at #10.  The Guardian reports that both of these claims were pretty transparently false.  Coulson got a less thorough vetting than his predecessors in the Brown and Blair cabinets, and the Tory vetting was laughable:

Coulson was also screened by a private company when he started working for the Conservatives in 2007. Asked in the Commons, Cameron refused to name the firm involved.

Electoral Commission returns show that the party last year used Control Risks Screening to vet several staff at a cost of £145.70 per check. If this is the level of vetting undergone by Coulson it is likely to have involved only the most cursory checks of online records.

It sounds like the Tory vetting was the British equivalent of pulling a credit report, which is probably why Cameron didn’t want to go down that road.  And the vetting when Coulson was hired at #10 smells like Cameron and his staff didn’t want to know what Coulson had been up to.

More importantly, if Cameron dissembled to hide Coulson’s low-quality vetting, then he must also be hiding something about BSkyB, because that’s the other thing he was slippery and slimy about today.

Also, too:  can someone explain why the Liberal Democrats aren’t taking this opportunity to ditch Cameron and flip to Labour, getting more concessions as they go?

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Just Let It All Burn
Next Post: Tone issues »

Reader Interactions

34Comments

  1. 1.

    toschek

    July 20, 2011 at 10:02 pm

    There was a 5 year agreement between the conservatives and the liberal democrats at the start of the coalition to prevent exactly the flipping scenario you describe from what my friends in the UK have told me.

  2. 2.

    Linkmeister

    July 20, 2011 at 10:04 pm

    Tangentially related, there was a pic of Rebekah Brooks testifying yesterday which immediately caused me to exclaim “It’s Bellatrix LeGrange!”

  3. 3.

    KeithW

    July 20, 2011 at 10:05 pm

    It’s worth pointing out that for all of Ed’s supposed failings, Labour are ahead in the polls. They might prefer that Ed takes the Ian Duncan Smith role and bows out in favour of either another Ed or another Milliband, but Labour have been doing fine.

    I think the Lib Dems have no choice but to continue to prop up the Tories, hope that the economy recovers, and everybody forgets in 2015 what they did in 2010. They can’t fight a general election in the immediate future, because they’ll be decimated. There’s no real way that they could force a vote of no-confidence and then form a new government with Labour. Cameron would have to call a new election.

  4. 4.

    MikeJ

    July 20, 2011 at 10:07 pm

    No Sounders v Man U open thread?

  5. 5.

    Calouste

    July 20, 2011 at 10:08 pm

    Labour and the LibDems don’t have a majority, they only have 314 of the 650 seats. So somehow they’d have to get support from the Scottish, Welsh and Northern Irish parties. Not impossible, but not trivial either.

    @toschek:

    That agreement was more to prevent the Tories from dumping the LibDems the moment they would be having a majority in the polls.

  6. 6.

    toschek

    July 20, 2011 at 10:10 pm

    cuts both ways though doesn’t it?

    yeah, that was the other thing that I wanted to confirm with my friend over there; a labour + lib dem coalition is something like 20 seats behind right?

  7. 7.

    Davis X. Machina

    July 20, 2011 at 10:12 pm

    If the LibDems went to the country now, they’d be down to about 9 seats in the West Country. My English friend calls them the SNP (Somerset Nationalist Party).

    It’s hard to find an article about Nick Clegg that doesn’t have the phrase ‘mess of pottage‘ in it.

  8. 8.

    me

    July 20, 2011 at 10:12 pm

    Also, too: can someone explain why the Liberal Democrats aren’t taking this opportunity to ditch Cameron and flip to Labour, getting more concessions as they go?

    My understanding is that this would probably force an election which would see the LibDems creamed.

  9. 9.

    schrodinger's cat

    July 20, 2011 at 10:17 pm

    Meanwhile, BJ’s favorite British blogger is fluffing Cameron on his blog.

  10. 10.

    mistermix

    July 20, 2011 at 10:17 pm

    So basically the LibDems are so far down right now that the election that this would force would kill them – makes sense. Thanks for all of you who actually know something about British politics.

  11. 11.

    Mornington Crescent

    July 20, 2011 at 10:18 pm

    Because if the Lib Dems triggered an election, they’d get slaughtered. They’re running substantially behind their election poll numbers. They know this is their only chance at government for a long time, so they’re going to let it ride.

  12. 12.

    Jc

    July 20, 2011 at 10:40 pm

    Cameron comes across smoother and MUCH more human than Milbrand. I don’t know how important the leader is in England as opposed to the party, but labor’s going to need a better speaker as leader.

  13. 13.

    scav

    July 20, 2011 at 10:40 pm

    Did you forget to develop the second lie, or rather the tacit admission that he did talk about the BSkyB stuff with the Murcochy crowd only, he insists, that all talks were ‘appropriate’?

    Right now I’m having fun running with the financial / Murdoch threads (although I treated myself to some exploring of the Parliamentary website including the thing explaining select committees). Haven’t a clue on politics although I think I read a poll yesterday that still had everyone holding steady even post brouhaha. There was something about it that made me snort: will go try to find it.

    Agree on the basic ranking of Cameron v. Miliband today. As much as I liked the exuberant toddler antics combined with people who seem to have verbal dexterity and enjoy wielding it with vim, panache and elan, I really like Keith Vaz, the MP from the home affairs (police oriented) select committee who’s calm and cheerful which comes across as stunningly unexpected against the Romper Room on Corn Syrup Day backdrop they can apparently get going.

  14. 14.

    toschek

    July 20, 2011 at 10:56 pm

    @jc

    Cameron comes across smoother slicker and MUCH more human oilier than Milliband.

    http://www.andybarefoot.com/politics/poster.php?line1=look+at+my+face%21&line2=I+have+a+designer+who+got+rid+of+all+the+oilstains%2C&logo1=BIG&logo2=OILY&logo3=LIAR&tagline1=but+he+couldn%27t+fix+the+twitching.&size=3

  15. 15.

    Southern Beale

    July 20, 2011 at 11:05 pm

    Cenk Uygur has left @MSNBC and he explains why in this video. Whether you liked him or not, it says so much about what’s wrong with cable news and the “liberal media.”

  16. 16.

    scav

    July 20, 2011 at 11:07 pm

    Found the Poll I was taking of here, what follows is the snorty bit

    David Cameron remains more popular than either the coalition government or other leading politicians, although more people think he is doing a bad job than a good one.

    and here’s a general polling site: ukpollingreport

  17. 17.

    Brachiator

    July 20, 2011 at 11:42 pm

    I strongly suggest that people download the BBC Friday Night comedy shows (iTunes and elsewhere). You get a sense of how ineffective Ed Millibrand and his brother are. Yes, Ed has a brother David.

    Also, too:  can someone explain why the Liberal Democrats aren’t taking this opportunity to ditch Cameron and flip to Labour, getting more concessions as they go?

    Doesn’t quite work that way. The Tories and Lib Dems are stuck with each other. Only Cameron could call a new election, and there is no guarantee that a strong Labour Lib Dem coalition would emerge.

    Also, Labour kissed Murdoch’s ass big time when they were in power. And the UK equivalent of the financial meltdown, along with MP (member of Parliament) living expense corruption happened during Labour’s control of the government. Labour has an uphill battle with voters to show that they deserve a second chance.

    Meanwhile, Lib Dem leader Clegg has to show that he is more than a cynical opportunist. Good luck with that.

    The crazy thing is that the Royal family, which previously seemed perched to fade into oblivion, looks to be one of the few British institutions to be relatively free of the taint of corruption.

  18. 18.

    Elliecat

    July 21, 2011 at 12:06 am

    @Brachiator

    I strongly suggest that people download the BBC Friday Night comedy shows (iTunes and elsewhere). You get a sense of how ineffective Ed Millibrand and his brother are. Yes, Ed has a brother David.

    I first heard of Ed and David Milliband on “The News Quiz” when a panelist remarked how he really used to love their brother Steve. (Took everyone a beat or two.)

    You can get the podcasts right from BBC Friday comedy podcast page too. Just about everything I know about UK politics and current events comes from listening to “The Now Show” and “The News Quiz.” I wish we had political comedians that good over here.

  19. 19.

    handsmile

    July 21, 2011 at 12:09 am

    According to a Guardian/ICM Research poll that was released on Monday, the phone-hacking scandal has had little effect thus far on public opinion of Britain’s political leaders and parties. The poll was conducted from July 15-17 with a sample of over 1000 adults.

    The Conservatives remain the most popular party at 37%; Labor has actually lost ground to 36%. That slight loss has redounded to the Liberal Democrats whose support now registers at 16%, its highest percentage since March.

    Among leading politicians, David Cameron enjoys the highest popularity with an approval/disapproval rate of 43/48; Ed Miliband’s ratio is 31/47, a very modest gain in his approval.

    As I wrote a couple days ago, Nick Clegg, leader of the Liberal Democrats, has been a pinata ever since his endorsement of higher university fees, repudiating both a personal campaign promise and a long-standing party position. The Liberal Democrats are widely perceived as craven opportunists, abandoning their proud reputation as the alternative to the major parties. They have become the decidedly junior member of a coalition that has slashed support to health services, education, housing, local governance, etc. to a degree far exceeding the so-called reforms campaigned on last year. The rout of LibDem politicians in recent local elections attests to their miserable prospects in the immediate future.

    All that being said, Guardian columnist and London City University professor Roy Greenslade wrote a provocative article yesterday urging Clegg to break decisively from a mortally-wounded Cameron. And today, Clegg conducted his first independent press conference since the Millie Dowling chapter of the phone-hacking scandal exploded last week.

    It bears monitoring the degree to which Cameron’s evasions and grudging admissions on Andy Coulson and the BSkyB takeover today in Parliament will be scrutinized. Conservatives are hoping that the start of the eight-week parliamentary recess and the agreement on several public investigations into specific aspects of the scandal will see interest wither on the part of the public and the media. This article by Guardian columnist Seamus Milne astutely diagnoses where the matter now stands:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jul/20/scandal-exposed-scale-elite-corruption

  20. 20.

    Dollared

    July 21, 2011 at 12:11 am

    @MikeJ, please no open thread for Sounders-ManU. I couldn’t stand the embarassment.

    Of course, there’s always the Mariners…..

  21. 21.

    handsmile

    July 21, 2011 at 12:46 am

    And if only to demonstrate that I can write something without linking to the Guardian, I must say that I do disagree with mistermix’s characterization of the respective “performances” by Cameron (‘decent’) and Miliband (‘awful’).

    Cameron’s “plausible” answers have already been dissected, generating headlines as to their evasiveness and defensiveness, which in turn promotes questions about his judgment.

    Miliband, once perceived as a mere placeholder as Labor leader, has been transformed into a firebrand by this scandal. Insisting early on for public and wide-ranging investigations, he demonstrated keen leadership by channeling public and parliamentary outrage into concrete proposals. During last week’s “Question Time” in Parliament, he tormented Cameron for his tepid and cautious response. If Miliband was less forceful by comparison in today’s session, he has already established himself as the politician who first denounced Murdoch and the baleful role of NewsInternational.

  22. 22.

    Joel

    July 21, 2011 at 1:05 am

    @Dollared: MLS is basically AAAA level compared to Premiership, and putting in your reserves against Manchester United is like fielding a AA team against the Yankees.

  23. 23.

    Comrade Kevin

    July 21, 2011 at 1:13 am

    It sounds like the Tory vetting was the British equivalent of pulling a credit report, which is probably why Cameron didn’t want to go down that road.

    I’d say it’s more like the British version of vetting Sarah Palin.

  24. 24.

    Dollared

    July 21, 2011 at 1:19 am

    @ Joel. I know. I was watching. And no, I had never seen the guys on the back line for the Sounders before.

    Er, I take that back. I probably played against them in pickup at U of Washington when they were in high school. You know, when your 40-something friends bring their kids over to the pickup game, just to have them run rings around the old guys, and then they tell you where their whiz kid is heading on scholarship afterward.

    But man, that was embarassing. Hope Wayne Rooney feels good about himself tonight.

  25. 25.

    Dollared

    July 21, 2011 at 1:23 am

    @Comrade Kevin

    FTW and more true than you might think. If you have the Murdochs on your side, do you really need to worry about the other guy’s oppo research? Remember George Bush’s irrelevant desertion and DWI, and how they got no press coverage?

  26. 26.

    tomvox1

    July 21, 2011 at 1:48 am

    What is really awesome about all this aside from the obvious Murdoch shaming is watching Sully’s Golden Boy go down as just another slick double-talking “compassionate conservative” grifter. You’d think after W he would’ve learned something about these irrational conservative crushes…

  27. 27.

    scav

    July 21, 2011 at 1:49 am

    handsmile: let’s give a round of thanks to those maintaining the guardian servers.

    The comment/evaluation on Milliband.D I found most illuminating is that he’d finally earned the right to take his L-plate off and we’d have to wait and see how he did in future. I’m not getting the impression that he’s consolidated his gains yet. But, see above, I’m off paddling with the financial stuff and am equally out of my depth there.

  28. 28.

    ciaran

    July 21, 2011 at 5:15 am

    the lib dems ran a obama-esque feel good election campaign. their core support was young left leaning people who are generally horrified to see them signing up for the full on tory agenda.

  29. 29.

    Amir_Khalid

    July 21, 2011 at 6:26 am

    @Brachiator:

    The crazy thing is that the Royal family, which previously seemed perched to fade into oblivion, looks to be one of the few British institutions to be relatively free of the taint of corruption.

    They hold a symbolic position, and the younger (and prettier) royals are glamorous figures; but they wield little if any real power. So I suspect there is nothing to gain from buying them.

  30. 30.

    ALeming

    July 21, 2011 at 7:56 am

    Hi everyone,
    I may not write here (at least never before), however, I stop by every now and then due to my mild fascination with US politics. As an English fella I have a couple of recommendations for you to check out that you may not have found yet.

    Firstly Tim Ireland has an amazing, and respected, investigative blog right here, that is currently finding more cases, including some that appear to involve US citizens! He also obviously has links to other blogs that are worth a look for British based news and views.

    Secondly, and it may not specifically help with this story at this moment but this site is a good place to start if you want to double check things coming out of the UK, just for future referance.

    As for my take on the leaders, which seems to be the crux of many peoples comments revolve around, here we go; Essentially they are all entirely useless/untrustworthy, Clegg, for whom I had hope (I have essentially always been a Lib Dem voter bar a few Green party votes, and mostly liked him before the coalition) has proven me to be an idiot as this hope faded drastically! Mostly due to him caving in on almost everything. Cameron hasn’t been able to lead his party or the country anywhere, as he always has to reverse his decision due to public outrage! The glaring exception being the fact that he and Osbourne fucked our economy by pushing through the most ridiculous cuts, boosting student loans and also trying to rip benefits from the frozen fingers of the poor and disabled. Somehow people here think all people receiving benefits, are thieves! I guess you don’t experience that sort of stereotyping over the pond. He may be confident but has the charm of a sociopath and it shines through. As for Ed I don’t even know how he got into the race to become opposition leader, let alone beat his brother to it!

    Sorry, that went on for ages.

  31. 31.

    Commenting at Balloon Juice since 1937

    July 21, 2011 at 8:01 am

    For 145 pounds, do you even have to pee in a cup?

  32. 32.

    rea

    July 21, 2011 at 9:36 am

    @26 You’d think after W he would’ve learned something about these irrational conservative crushes…

    If he weren’t irrational, he wouldn’t be conservative.

  33. 33.

    Nutella

    July 21, 2011 at 10:20 am

    @ALeming:

    Somehow people here think all people receiving benefits, are thieves! I guess you don’t experience that sort of stereotyping over the pond.

    A very fine example of understated British humor. Or ALeming isn’t following US news.

  34. 34.

    daveNYC

    July 21, 2011 at 1:02 pm

    What is really awesome about all this aside from the obvious Murdoch shaming is watching Sully’s Golden Boy go down as just another slick double-talking “compassionate conservative” grifter. You’d think after W he would’ve learned something about these irrational conservative crushes…

    The key point is that Sullivan doesn’t learn. He’ll make snap judgements, spend months being told why he’s wrong and then slowly walking them back, and then he’ll go ahead and make the exact same snap judgement the next time he can.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - PaulB - Olympic Peninsula: Lake Quinault Loop Drive 5
Image by PaulB (5/19/25)

Recent Comments

  • suzanne on Monday Evening Open Thread: Perspective (May 19, 2025 @ 8:40pm)
  • trollhattan on Monday Evening Open Thread: Perspective (May 19, 2025 @ 8:38pm)
  • dnfree on Monday Evening Open Thread: Perspective (May 19, 2025 @ 8:34pm)
  • different-church-lady on Monday Evening Open Thread: Perspective (May 19, 2025 @ 8:34pm)
  • Gin & Tonic on War for Ukraine Day 1,180: The Cost (May 19, 2025 @ 8:30pm)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!