• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Wow, I can’t imagine what it was like to comment in morse code.

Usually wrong but never in doubt

Conservatism: there are some people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

fuckem (in honor of the late great efgoldman)

The next time the wall wtreet journal editorial board speaks the truth will be the first.

In my day, never was longer.

Wow, you are pre-disappointed. How surprising.

Good lord, these people are nuts.

We still have time to mess this up!

Anyone who bans teaching American history has no right to shape America’s future.

Consistently wrong since 2002

And we’re all out of bubblegum.

Give the craziest people you know everything they want and hope they don’t ask for more? Great plan.

A snarling mass of vitriolic jackals

Putin must be throwing ketchup at the walls.

It may be funny to you motherfucker, but it’s not funny to me.

That’s my take and I am available for criticism at this time.

“Jesus paying for the sins of everyone is an insult to those who paid for their own sins.”

You can’t love your country only when you win.

Reality always lies in wait for … Democrats.

Let’s not be the monsters we hate.

Speaking of republicans, is there a way for a political party to declare intellectual bankruptcy?

Republicans do not pay their debts.

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / An Unexamined Scandal / We’ve Determined That Trying To Cover It Up Requires Too Much Effort

We’ve Determined That Trying To Cover It Up Requires Too Much Effort

by Zandar|  October 18, 201210:31 am| 89 Comments

This post is in: An Unexamined Scandal, The Brown Enemy Within, Vote Like Your Country Depends On It, Teabagger Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

Republicans don’t even care anymore.  The effort to disenfranchise minority voters is so obvious at this point that it’s simply met with a shrug in places like Arizona:

The Maricopa County Elections Department mistakenly listed the wrong date of the upcoming general election on an official government document.

The error appears on a document containing a voter ID card.

In addition to the ID card, the piece of paper it comes in lists other information such as important election dates.

In the corner of the document, it says November 6th in English but in Spanish it reads 8 de Noviembre, the 8th of November.

Sure.  The election date in Spanish was wrong.  But only in Spanish.   That was a mistake.   Of course it was.  Now show me your papers, citizen.  You must be one of those undesirables if you’re asking questions about this.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Eye Candy, Low Earth/On Earth Orbit(er) edition
Next Post: You got Time, you got Newsweek »

Reader Interactions

89Comments

  1. 1.

    MattF

    October 18, 2012 at 10:33 am

    Oh, c’mon… everyone knows that ‘6’, in Spanish, is ‘8’.

  2. 2.

    linda

    October 18, 2012 at 10:34 am

    That wasn’t on purpose! Thry didn’t kmow the Spanish numbet for “6”

  3. 3.

    Ben Franklin

    October 18, 2012 at 10:36 am

    No matter. they have Binders with Hispanic voters they want to help.

  4. 4.

    Elizabelle

    October 18, 2012 at 10:37 am

    Perhaps this could help increase turnout, once news of the “mistake” gets out.

  5. 5.

    Mal Wood

    October 18, 2012 at 10:39 am

    I just don’t understand why your country, which purports to be some sort of democratic paradise, does not have a national independent Electoral Commission that takes care of voting and elections like we do in Australia. What gives?

  6. 6.

    aimai

    October 18, 2012 at 10:39 am

    I agree with Elizabelle, I have to believe (I HAVE to believe) that the counter programming of GOTV actually makes this little lie a huge boost. Basically no one is going to just wander into this election. very few serious voters or new voters just glance at the card and say “OK, that makes sense.” People who just registered to vote are on a GOTV list somewhere and they will be contacted 7 times before the election. That’s a lot of time to get people good and pissed off about this.

    aimai

  7. 7.

    Elizabelle

    October 18, 2012 at 10:40 am

    From the link:

    The Elections Department spokesperson assured ABC15 the only people affected by the mistake are those who received their voter ID card document in person at the recorder’s office and not through the mail.
    __
    The Elections Department spokesperson estimates fewer than 50 people received a document showing the incorrect date.

    Read more: http://www.abc15.com/dpp/news/region_phoenix_metro/central_phoenix/Maricopa-County-Elections-Department-admits-error-on-date-of-general-election-on-voter-ID-cards#ixzz29f5HE0K9

    I wonder if it is only fifty.

    And there’s nothing in the story about how the Elections Department plans to rectify this.

  8. 8.

    piratedan

    October 18, 2012 at 10:40 am

    I truly think AZ is more of a battleground than people think. The folks with their collective ears to the ground are implying that both the Latino and Native American voters are a wee bit more engaged this time around since the R’s have emphatically gone around the bend. Internal Latino polling is showing a big uptick in Latino participation:

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/10/10/1142609/-Why-Arizona-may-be-the-surprise-of-2012-the-big-Latino-vote-that-you-didn-t-see-coming

    Now, the 64 thousand dollar question is will the folks actually show up to the polls, this latest bit of Republican chicanery seems to imply that the R’s are scared enough to try and perform a bit of pre-emptive ratfucking just in case.

    Also too, Flake has a completely bogus hit job ad out smacking Carmona on his “anger issues” taken from closed testimony from when he was leaving as Surgeon General when the Bush Administration tried to politicize health care. Projectionism at its finest. Timing is incredibly Rovian too.

    Hoping that the R attention to the Latino details portend some doom in their future.

  9. 9.

    red dog

    October 18, 2012 at 10:41 am

    @Elizabelle: I hope this turns into the “47%” for Phoenix. Get it on the Spanish radio stations.

  10. 10.

    kindness

    October 18, 2012 at 10:41 am

    Republicans suck. Growing up in the north east I was surrounded by a Republican party that was socially liberal and fiscally conservative. When I moved out to CA I found Republicans here are pretty much foaming at the mouth trogladites. Sadly it is the trogladites that have taken over the party.

    I’m really curious to see what Obama does on Jon Stewart tonight. Should be a fun watch.

  11. 11.

    Face

    October 18, 2012 at 10:45 am

    And there’s nothing in the story about how the Elections Department plans to rectify amplify and exacerbate this.

    FTFY.

  12. 12.

    shortstop

    October 18, 2012 at 10:47 am

    Welcome to America! Now learn numbers!

  13. 13.

    Mnemosyne

    October 18, 2012 at 10:47 am

    Apparently Arizona Republicans did not learn from the mistakes of California Republicans, who decided that Latino voters were permanently apathetic and there was no way any action by the Republicans could energize them to get to the polls. So the Republicans sponsored Prop 187, and the only Republican who’s been elected to statewide office since then got there by exploiting a recall of the Democratic governor.

    Whoops.

  14. 14.

    SatanicPanic

    October 18, 2012 at 10:49 am

    This is the kind of shit Republicans were doing in California right before they became a permanent minority.

  15. 15.

    some guy

    October 18, 2012 at 10:49 am

    seis, ocho

    they look soooo similar, this is a totally understandable mistake.

    hope this gets a ton of play in Hispanic media, in AZ and elsewhere

  16. 16.

    some guy

    October 18, 2012 at 10:49 am

    seis, ocho

    they look soooo similar, this is a totally understandable mistake.

    hope this gets a ton of play in Hispanic media, in AZ and elsewhere

  17. 17.

    Violet

    October 18, 2012 at 10:55 am

    I think the Republicans are going to far with this kind of stuff. People who are directly affected are really pissed off. They are making sure those folks never vote for Republicans. And folks like me who aren’t going to be affected by that sort of thing are equally pissed off. I’ll never vote for a Republican again. I live in a blood red state, so sometimes it’s a Republican or nothing, but in those cases I’ll abstain. Never. Again. NEVER.

  18. 18.

    Cacti

    October 18, 2012 at 10:57 am

    The politics in this state are a sewer of unchecked Republican corruption.

    Our hispanic population will continue to be goaded, mistreated, and provoked, until such time as they decide to flex some political muscle in the voting booth.

  19. 19.

    Lurking Canadian

    October 18, 2012 at 10:58 am

    Is my understanding correct that the Voting Rights Act has some kind of special treatment for a handful of ((cough) Confederate) states that requires them to get federal approval for voting law changes, but exempts other states not on the “You are bad because of Jim Crow” list? What is the likelihood that law could be modified so every state had to meet the same standard of federal scrutiny? It seems this shit is happening in places (Ohio, Pennsylvania, Arizona) that are not former Jim Crow states, and therefore get to skate by the rules.

  20. 20.

    Ben Cisco (onboard the Defiant)

    October 18, 2012 at 11:03 am

    NC early voting starts…now. I am in line and moving forward.

  21. 21.

    Patricia Kayden

    October 18, 2012 at 11:05 am

    @Elizabelle: Hope this is true. Kind of like what’s going on in Ohio with Black voters.

    This is all just silliness and will not work. Better for a certain party to change its ways so that it can actually attract minority voters and not worry about trying to suppress them.

  22. 22.

    Jimi

    October 18, 2012 at 11:06 am

    If six turned out to be nine,
    I don’t mind…

  23. 23.

    Roger Moore

    October 18, 2012 at 11:07 am

    @Mnemosyne:

    the only Republican who’s been elected to statewide office since then got there by exploiting a recall of the Democratic governor.

    Not quite true. Steve Poizner got elected Insurance Commissioner, largely by having enough money that he didn’t have to get campaign cash from the insurance industry.

    Back on topic, I’m waiting for the complaints that we shouldn’t be issuing voting cards in Spanish in the first place, because all our voting materials should be in English like God intended.

  24. 24.

    danimal

    October 18, 2012 at 11:08 am

    The state level information I’ve seen indicates that AZ is much more in play than the national folks believe. Carmona has a lead in the Senate race, and the presidential race is considered safe GOP ‘cuz McCain won by 8 points last time. Um, McCain is from AZ, of course he got a home state advantage. Plus, the immigration initiative does appear to have created some solid Dem momentum in the Hispanic community.

    It’s becoming interesting. We could see a red WI and blue AZ this year.

  25. 25.

    Spatula

    October 18, 2012 at 11:08 am

    Wow.

  26. 26.

    rlrr

    October 18, 2012 at 11:08 am

    @Roger Moore:

    because all our voting materials should be in English like God intended.

    If English was good enough for Jesus…

  27. 27.

    japa21

    October 18, 2012 at 11:09 am

    Well, it seems to me that the only proper recourse is to go to court and require the polls also be open on November 8 to allow for those who received this in error to vote on that day. And since I am sure they have no idea of the specific voters involved, and since many may have already discarded the letter, they cannot tell who did and did not receive this notice. And since it is only in Spanish, only Spanish speaking voters would be allowed to vote that day.

    Let’s say the election is within a couple thousand votes and the Hispanics in that county know they can turn out enough votes to change the election, don’t you think they would be able to?

  28. 28.

    Phoenix_rising

    October 18, 2012 at 11:10 am

    El Piolin gonna have a field day with this.

    Earned media, for real. Have they forgotten the marches of schoolkids, organized entirely by radio and social media, a few Mays ago?

    Can Eric Holder parachute some lawyers from the civil rights division in there, today?

  29. 29.

    rlrr

    October 18, 2012 at 11:10 am

    @danimal:

    McCain is from AZ, of course he got a home state advantage.

    Something that eludes the current GOP nominee…

  30. 30.

    eric

    October 18, 2012 at 11:12 am

    hey liberals, where was all this outrage when the country elected Obama?

  31. 31.

    Yutsano

    October 18, 2012 at 11:13 am

    @danimal:

    We could see a red WI and blue AZ this year

    Nah. Not even Paulie Boy will turn WI red. And really AZ only went red in 2008 because of Grandpa Walnuts.

  32. 32.

    Belafon (formerly anonevent)

    October 18, 2012 at 11:13 am

    @Lurking Canadian: You mean the law that the South is trying to get the Supreme Court to end, because, in part, the conservatives on the Supreme Court are itching to end.

  33. 33.

    Yutsano

    October 18, 2012 at 11:14 am

    @danimal:

    We could see a red WI and blue AZ this year

    Nah. Not even Paulie Boy will turn WI red. And really AZ only went red in 2008 because of Grandpa Walnuts.

  34. 34.

    Belafon (formerly anonevent)

    October 18, 2012 at 11:14 am

    @Lurking Canadian: You mean the law that the South is trying to get the Supreme Court to end, because, in part, the conservatives on the Supreme Court are itching to end.

  35. 35.

    Belafon (formerly anonevent)

    October 18, 2012 at 11:15 am

    @Lurking Canadian: You mean the law that the South is trying to get the Supreme Court to end, because, in part, the conservatives on the Supreme Court are itching to end.

  36. 36.

    catclub

    October 18, 2012 at 11:17 am

    @Lurking Canadian: “What is the likelihood that law could be modified so every state had to meet the same standard of federal scrutiny?”

    Zero. SATSQ

  37. 37.

    General Stuck

    October 18, 2012 at 11:17 am

    Eternal republican over reach. It is our best weapon and we usually don’t have to move a muscle to deploy it, as the nutters are always helpful that way. They do not understand the basic economics of messaging, even though they are very disciplined. The laws of diminishing returns for treating minorities like second class citizens (at least the ones that don’t vote GOP) is like any other threshold of moderation. You venture past it at your own risk of blowback in electoral politics, that is zero sum and your opponent WILL make hay from your excesses.

    Take for instance Scott Brown and his sidekick Colonel Mustard going super nova with the asinine Indian thing with Liz Warren, an they are now reaping a giant crop of Kudzu for their trouble.

    A new Public Policy Polling survey in Massachusetts finds Elizabeth Warren (D) with a nine-point lead over Sen. Scott Brown (R), 53% to 44%.

    This should have been predictable in a very liberal state. But once the wingnut latches onto a tasty bone with a stench of rabid bigotry, they just can’t let go. The echo chamber between their ears tells them that everyone hears the same wind rushing through that empty space. I’ve never seen it this bad, with a near psychotic break from reality throughout the right wing realm. Obama is the worst person in the world and EVERYONE KNOWS IT. So he can’t possibly be reelected. And it spreads out from there in concentric circles of blissful ignorance.

    We often envy the republican discipline for messaging. But when the message is shit and you don’t know when to stop, that is nothing to envy.

  38. 38.

    Violet

    October 18, 2012 at 11:18 am

    @Phoenix_rising: That was a real big deal. The largely Latino high school near me was shut when the marches happened. The young women who worked at the dry cleaners where I took my clothes were talking about it the day or so before: “Are you going to go?” “I don’t know, I’ll have to miss work,”

  39. 39.

    Forum Transmitted Disease

    October 18, 2012 at 11:18 am

    Time to send the National Guard into Maricopa County and declare martial law.

    When the election’s done they can put Arapaio into his own fucking jail on the way out.

  40. 40.

    Yutsano

    October 18, 2012 at 11:19 am

    FYWP. No really.

  41. 41.

    Chris

    October 18, 2012 at 11:23 am

    OT: apparently, Gallup has Romney beating Obama in the polls for the first time ever.

  42. 42.

    The Tragically Flip

    October 18, 2012 at 11:24 am

    Funny how these “mistakes” always put the election date after the real one, and it’s always a minority group that gets these “misprints.”

    People need to be prosecuted for this. It should be a form of criminal negligence, anyone telling others when the election is have an affirmative duty to get the information correct.

  43. 43.

    eric

    October 18, 2012 at 11:26 am

    @The Tragically Flip: pretty soon gringos will be the minority…..

  44. 44.

    rikyrah

    October 18, 2012 at 11:26 am

    thought I was the only one who saw it your way, ZANDER.

  45. 45.

    Judas Escargot, Acerbic Prophet of the Mighty Potato God

    October 18, 2012 at 11:27 am

    Rightwing response: I’m sure it’s just an honest mistake. You libtards are all so quick to jump to conclusions and take offense.

  46. 46.

    hueyplong

    October 18, 2012 at 11:29 am

    “hey liberals, where was all this outrage when the country elected Obama?”

    The Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to Obama for nothing more than ending GOP rule of the executive branch in the world’s most powerful country. So it appears that around the world, the proper term wasn’t “outrage” but was instead “prayers of thanksgiving,” sparky.

    Your own “outrage” was just a Schadenfreudelicious treat for dessert. I believe I’ll have Mitt order the waitstaff to bring another helping.

  47. 47.

    Chris

    October 18, 2012 at 11:29 am

    @kindness:

    Growing up in the north east I was surrounded by a Republican party that was socially liberal and fiscally conservative. When I moved out to CA I found Republicans here are pretty much foaming at the mouth trogladites.

    Heck, I remember (not really, but I read history books) when the face of the New Deal in New York City was a Republican mayor.

    If you moved back to the Northeast, I suspect you’d find they’re foaming at the mouth troglodytes nowadays too. The Northeast did give us the Ovenmitt, after all.

  48. 48.

    Forum Transmitted Disease

    October 18, 2012 at 11:32 am

    So the Republicans sponsored Prop 187

    @Mnemosyne: Pete Wilson is very good friends with my dad’s neighbor, so I get to run into him a couple of times a year. I always tell him “thank you”. He always looks a bit puzzled (I’ve never said what I’m thanking him for) but says “you’re welcome!” Very polite man.

    He gave Dems this state for at least a generation. He’ll go to his grave not understanding that.

  49. 49.

    peach flavored shampoo

    October 18, 2012 at 11:33 am

    until such time as they decide to flex some political muscle in the voting booth.

    But they’d have to actually be allowed in the booth, first. This is where they’ll be stymied, IMO. Lots and lots of police stops and document checks half-mile from the polling stations.

  50. 50.

    Judas Escargot, Acerbic Prophet of the Mighty Potato God

    October 18, 2012 at 11:34 am

    @General Stuck:

    This should have been predictable in a very liberal state. But once the wingnut latches onto a tasty bone with a stench of rabid bigotry, they just can’t let go.

    Scott Brown’s one (and as far as I can tell, only) gift is his charisma/likeability/charm. Hey, some folks are just born with it.

    That’s why I was shocked that his campaign went negative, while he was still somewhat ahead in the polls. Badly advised, I suspect.

    Sen. Brown’s only ‘coin’, and he spent it all too eagerly. Now it’s probably gone forever (along with any chances he might have had to be Mass Gov in the future).

  51. 51.

    Lurking Canadian

    October 18, 2012 at 11:36 am

    @catclub: Honest question: why zero? It’s not a constitutional amendment, is it? Is it because the Senators wouldn’t go for it, federal encroachment, states’ rights la la la?

    I can certainly see that you’d need a filibuster proof majority to get it through, but that’s “slim” not “none”. Surely every Democrat would see it as something that helped his or her own chances of reelection?

  52. 52.

    Roger Moore

    October 18, 2012 at 11:38 am

    @rlrr:
    I’m more inclined to think that voting material should look like this the way it does at my polling place.

  53. 53.

    catclub

    October 18, 2012 at 11:40 am

    @Roger Moore: Link doesn’t work. Picasa says that page not found.

  54. 54.

    Roger Moore

    October 18, 2012 at 11:41 am

    @Forum Transmitted Disease:

    He gave Dems this state for at least a generation. He’ll go to his grave not understanding that.

    I’m not sure about the not understanding that. I think he’s smart enough to recognize the outcome, even if his ideology may blind him to the reason that 187 was such a big deal.

  55. 55.

    catclub

    October 18, 2012 at 11:44 am

    @Lurking Canadian: I meant zero in a practical, not mathematical sense.

    It would be a good law.

    One that you could say to the states: “If you’re not doing anything wrong, why are you so worried about us forbidding you to have bedroom drapes.” Not an ideal selling point.

  56. 56.

    Roger Moore

    October 18, 2012 at 11:45 am

    @catclub:
    Oops. Forgot to make the album public. Should be fixed.

  57. 57.

    Forum Transmitted Disease

    October 18, 2012 at 11:49 am

    I can certainly see that you’d need a filibuster proof majority to get it through, but that’s “slim” not “none”. Surely every Democrat would see it as something that helped his or her own chances of reelection?

    @Lurking Canadian: I’m almost fifty. Dems (and Republicans for that matter) haven’t had a truly “filibuster-proof” majority in the Senate in my lifetime.

    (And five Blue Dogs plus Lieberman does not count!)

  58. 58.

    Roger Moore

    October 18, 2012 at 11:49 am

    @catclub:
    I think a better, but probably even less probable, approach would be to have actual uniform national voting rules. That would probably require a constitutional amendment, which isn’t going to happen as long as the problem of some states wanting to disenfranchise their voters persists.

  59. 59.

    Ben Cisco (onboard the Defiant)

    October 18, 2012 at 11:50 am

    Teabagger just crossed the no-go line and got handed his ass by a lady who could have been my grandmother.

    Think we haven’t noticed how we’ve been disrespected? Think again.

  60. 60.

    1badbaba3

    October 18, 2012 at 11:53 am

    @Ben Cisco (onboard the Defiant): Ahead warp factor one, Captain, aye! Or should I (dare I?) say forward? Either way, good on you. I can’t imagine the ghost of Jesse Helms has been resting easy these last five years what with all the nigras running around all upity and all, winning elections and throwing conventions, turning the state (gasp!) purple. Things sure have changed down there since I moved away in 2001. Never would have believed a Black man could take N.C. But he’s part Vulcan so that may explain at least some of it, no?

    @Jimi: If all the hippies cut off all their hair/ I don’t care.

    Hendrix rules. Hells yeah!

  61. 61.

    Ben Cisco (onboard the Defiant)

    October 18, 2012 at 11:56 am

    @1badbaba3: About to enter the building, going dark. You have the bridge.

  62. 62.

    xian

    October 18, 2012 at 12:05 pm

    @Mal Wood: because we’re the T Model Ford of democracy.

  63. 63.

    Marshall

    October 18, 2012 at 12:05 pm

    @Lurking Canadian:

    Most state politicians would be against it. A constitutional amendment to make voting uniform would be a lot more likely.

  64. 64.

    catclub

    October 18, 2012 at 12:07 pm

    @Forum Transmitted Disease: “And five Blue Dogs plus Lieberman does not count!”

    Lieberman is retiring this year. Or taking up his actual office as either health insurance lobbyist or AIPAC lobbyist.

  65. 65.

    Jay in Oregon

    October 18, 2012 at 12:07 pm

    @Mal Wood:
    Because elections, even for federal offices, are a state-level affair according to the Constitution.

    We don’t directly elect the President, we are actually voting for which electors get sent to vote in the Electoral College.

    It might be possible to develop a Federal Election Board that would pass Constitutional muster, but the screaming Teatards in Congress would never let such a thing be created.

  66. 66.

    Perspecticus

    October 18, 2012 at 12:08 pm

    @Mal Wood: Because “Freedom” and “shut up”, that’s why.

  67. 67.

    xian

    October 18, 2012 at 12:10 pm

    @kindness: i hate the term “fiscal conservative.” To liberals and moderates it means balanced budgets. To conservatives it means cutting taxes endlessly.

  68. 68.

    Nethead Jay

    October 18, 2012 at 12:10 pm

    Along the lines of voting shenanigans, I think there might be something brewing in virginia. Check out this post: Virginia GOP Caught Destroying Voter Registration Forms- UPDATED. The update at the bottom is especially interesting IMO. Would be nice if they could nail these scumbags for voter registration fraud.

  69. 69.

    1badbaba3

    October 18, 2012 at 12:20 pm

    @Ben Cisco (onboard the Defiant): Oh, we’ve noticed alright. Of course it’s not a hot button ish like ZOMG DROOOONNNNNZ! ! ! Or a cute-as-a-button adorable little meme like ZOMG BINDERRRRRZZZZ! ! ! But some of us have noticed (and you know who you are), and all I have to say is that Sununu and TargFlargFlagFleeenWhat the fuck ever better not ever find themselves “caught out” away from their Blackwater/Ze security detail. Be a shame if somethin’ were ta happen to ’em. Y’know, Chicago style.

    Yeah, throw Jack Welch into that group too.

  70. 70.

    amk

    October 18, 2012 at 12:20 pm

    @General Stuck: Did I ever I tell you I love reading your posts ?

  71. 71.

    chopper

    October 18, 2012 at 12:25 pm

    @Elizabelle:

    this is good if true. no just because it’s only 50 but also the news makes it look so sketchy and deliberate it could be use to fire up Latinos to vote even more. run with it, guys.

  72. 72.

    aimai

    October 18, 2012 at 12:28 pm

    @Elizabelle:

    What I find bizarre about this is how could that possibly even be true? The same documents are mailed to people that are handed out in person. There can’t be a separate stack of “fake” information unless this was a totally low level “hand this only to hispanic looking voters” in which case upper management should be firing people left and right. For it to make sense in a bureaucratic sense either someone very high up has to take responsibility for the “mistake” in all the printings-and the number printed should be publicly avaiailable–or the upper echelon should be publicly firing local people for handing this out.
    aimai

  73. 73.

    Haydnseek

    October 18, 2012 at 12:28 pm

    @rlrr: He speaks it rather well, considering that it’s a second language for him…..

  74. 74.

    Randy P

    October 18, 2012 at 12:39 pm

    @Mal Wood: There is a long-standing legal tradition that elections are run by states. I don’t know if it’s constitutionally required, but states have always had a lot of independence on that score.

    Still we do have a Federal Elections Commission.

  75. 75.

    xian

    October 18, 2012 at 12:42 pm

    @hueyplong: good response to a meaningless non sequitur

  76. 76.

    Bokonon

    October 18, 2012 at 12:58 pm

    Sez the media, “Oh well. Both sides do it! Now … stay tuned for the latest sports scores!”

  77. 77.

    Frankensteinbeck

    October 18, 2012 at 1:14 pm

    @kindness:
    Oh, please Celestia, no. Not another Stewart/Obama interview. The last one was Stewart’s lowest and most disgusting moment, they keystone for why I gave up on The Daily Show. Stewart spent the entire interview harping about how Obama hadn’t brought ‘change’, and the ONLY change Stewart would talk about was partisanship in Washington. Anything else Obama talked about was ignored. It was one of the most disgusting displays of blaming the victim I’ve ever seen, not to mention freakishly petty and tone deaf. It infuriated me.

  78. 78.

    Roger Moore

    October 18, 2012 at 1:20 pm

    @Haydnseek:

    He speaks it rather well, considering that it’s a second language for him…..

    You’re kidding, right? Try reading some of what he said; it’s all weird faggoty stuff like:

    Ye are the salt of the earth: but if the salt have lost his savor, wherewith shall it be salted? it is thenceforth good for nothing, but to be cast out, and to be trodden under foot of men.

    No red, white, and blue blooded American would talk like that!

  79. 79.

    pseudonymous in nc

    October 18, 2012 at 1:21 pm

    @Randy P:

    There is a long-standing legal tradition that elections are run by states. I don’t know if it’s constitutionally required–

    “The times, places and manner of holding elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each state by the legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by law make or alter such regulations, except as to the places of choosing Senators.”

    @Lurking Canadian:

    What is the likelihood that law could be modified so every state had to meet the same standard of federal scrutiny?

    Zero zip nada.

    Large parts of the US simply do not have a tradition of free and fair elections, and the constitutional and judicial framework is insufficient to address that.

  80. 80.

    Ben Cisco

    October 18, 2012 at 1:22 pm

    @1badbaba3: Mission accomplished, waited in queue about an hour.

    NOTE: All Teabagger personnel voluntarily withdrew to WELL beyond the Neutral Zone (in fact, out of my line of sight altogether) after their scout ship got vaporized.

  81. 81.

    Patricia Kayden

    October 18, 2012 at 1:27 pm

    @Nethead Jay: WOW. At least in this one instance, they were caught. How many registrations have other GOP offices destroyed/thrown away and not been caught?

  82. 82.

    Forum Transmitted Disease

    October 18, 2012 at 1:29 pm

    Oh, please Celestia, no. Not another Stewart/Obama interview.

    @Frankensteinbeck: My wife still thinks he’s funny, doesn’t understand why I’ll leave the room if his goddamned show is on. Fuck Stewart and his damnable Broderism.

  83. 83.

    danielx

    October 18, 2012 at 1:51 pm

    Only a fool or a Frenchman would think this is anything other than a mistake.

    Forthcoming David Brooks column: Republican efforts to limit voting by minorities and the poor are actually to those groups’ benefit, because being denied the vote will make them more determined to educate themselves and vote in the next election.

    Or something.

  84. 84.

    trollhattan

    October 18, 2012 at 1:55 pm

    When I visit Arizona, I insist on staying at Motel Ocho. It’s dos better.

  85. 85.

    Davis X. Machina

    October 18, 2012 at 2:42 pm

    @Frankensteinbeck: Good-bye “E pluribus unum”, hello “Too Cool For School”. Taking this politics stuff seriously is sooooo de trop.

    I’ll watch a month of Colbert before an hour of Stewart.

  86. 86.

    Jay in Oregon

    October 18, 2012 at 2:52 pm

    @Violet:

    People who are directly affected are really pissed off. They are making sure those folks never vote for Republicans. And folks like me who aren’t going to be affected by that sort of thing are equally pissed off.

    And then they claim they don’t have to appeal to minority voters because “they’ll never vote for a Republican anyway.”

    Conservatives are always the victims. Always. And a victim mentality can be a key component of an abusive personality.

    http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/anger-in-the-age-entitlement/201002/victim-identity-im-not-okay-youre-more-not-okay

  87. 87.

    Paul in KY

    October 18, 2012 at 3:00 pm

    @Mal Wood: Because, you damn furriner, that would abrogate each state’s right to ratfuck elections. And shut up, that’s another reason why.

  88. 88.

    Paul in KY

    October 18, 2012 at 3:11 pm

    @aimai: You can’t hardly fire them when that’s what you told them to do.

  89. 89.

    DavidTC

    October 18, 2012 at 10:38 pm

    When are we going to get 14th amendment on their ass?

    Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, _the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion_ which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.

    Let’s reduce their fucking congressional representation, along with their electoral votes, for this bullshit.

    (Interesting fact: None of the later amendments actually changed ‘male’ or ‘twenty-one’ in this specific amendment, so, proportionally, representation is still tied to what percentage of over twenty-one year old males are not denied the vote.)

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

2023 Pet Calendars

Pet Calendar Preview: A
Pet Calendar Preview: B

*Calendars can not be ordered until Cafe Press gets their calendar paper in.

Recent Comments

  • CaseyL on Eve of Destuction (Jan 27, 2023 @ 7:26pm)
  • WaterGirl on Eve of Destuction (Jan 27, 2023 @ 7:26pm)
  • NotMax on Eve of Destuction (Jan 27, 2023 @ 7:25pm)
  • TaMara on Eve of Destuction (Jan 27, 2023 @ 7:24pm)
  • JPL on Eve of Destuction (Jan 27, 2023 @ 7:24pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Favorite Dogs & Cats
Classified Documents: A Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Front-pager Twitter

John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
ActualCitizensUnited

Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice   

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!