• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Accountability, motherfuckers.

Conservatism: there are some people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

You can’t attract Republican voters. You can only out organize them.

Authoritarian republicans are opposed to freedom for the rest of us.

Their freedom requires your slavery.

Second rate reporter says what?

Sitting here in limbo waiting for the dice to roll

Only Democrats have agency, apparently.

I didn’t have alien invasion on my 2023 BINGO card.

Why is it so hard for them to condemn hate?

🎶 Those boots were made for mockin’ 🎵

The GOP is a fucking disgrace.

“Jesus paying for the sins of everyone is an insult to those who paid for their own sins.”

It’s time for the GOP to dust off that post-2012 autopsy, completely ignore it, and light the party on fire again.

If you are still in the GOP, you are an extremist.

The next time the wall street journal editorial board speaks the truth will be the first.

Speaking of republicans, is there a way for a political party to declare intellectual bankruptcy?

We still have time to mess this up!

Seems like a complicated subject, have you tried yelling at it?

After roe, women are no longer free.

… pundit janitors mopping up after the GOP

I wonder if trump will be tried as an adult.

They are lying in pursuit of an agenda.

Russian mouthpiece, go fuck yourself.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Past Elections / Election 2012 / Eagerly awaiting Romney’s plan to make up our shortfall in Naval Colliers

Eagerly awaiting Romney’s plan to make up our shortfall in Naval Colliers

by Soonergrunt|  October 23, 201212:51 pm| 229 Comments

This post is in: Election 2012, Open Threads, Vote Like Your Country Depends On It

FacebookTweetEmail

Ever since the incredibly short-sighted decision to decommission and sell off the last of our Fleet Colliers, USS Nero (AC-17) in 1922, we’ve never had as many Colliers as we did during World War I.   Last night, a man of singular vision reminded us all of the national disgrace of this critical shortage in coal transport capability.

We also don’t have a Presidential Yacht anymore.  The Republicans in Congress voted $2mil to repurchase Sequoia, but that hasn’t been done yet.  We are seriously falling down on the job here.  I don’t think that the two 747s the USAF uses for Air Force One missions are enough.  Of course, since we can cut off Iran’s route to the sea by interposing another country between Iran and Syria, maybe we don’t have an urgent need for naval colliers or presidential yachts.  I’ll have to think about this.

And while we’re on the subject, we should bring back the Chauchat if we can’t have the BARfor the ground forces.  After all, nobody in the world has a magazine-fed walking fire capability.  We’d be the only ones.  Even so, I don’t think that these are the proper technologies to use against the Soviet Union that Mr. Romney has been so worried about.  But as far as Iran is concerned, we’re cool, because we’ll just have the World Court arrest Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

On another note, Nate Silver’s 538 blog is predicting 290 EV for Obama on 6 November as of today.  70.3% chance of winning re-election with a 50.1% popular vote, and that the Senate will have a 52-seat Dem make up, by 87.6% chance.

Open Thread

 

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Another Poll
Next Post: Allow me to translate “send Medicaid to the states” for you »

Reader Interactions

229Comments

  1. 1.

    Soylent Green

    October 23, 2012 at 12:53 pm

    Zelig/Haskell 2012!

  2. 2.

    Joel

    October 23, 2012 at 12:54 pm

    Yep, Silver has Obama at 7-3 and Wang has Obama at 9-1. Let’s split the difference and say it’s 8-2. That’s still a 20% chance of very bad things, but it beats the alternative.

  3. 3.

    flukebucket

    October 23, 2012 at 12:55 pm

    DeMint/ D’Souza 2016!

  4. 4.

    SatanicPanic

    October 23, 2012 at 12:55 pm

    Dude you’re gonna give them ideas. Hannity would totally repeat this stuff

  5. 5.

    Political Observer

    October 23, 2012 at 12:55 pm

    Bottom line? Obama failed to move the needle last night. A draw is essentially a Romney win, since the moment continues to move in his direction.

    Obama has already lost North Carolina and Florida for sure. He’s losing Colorado. He’s lost Virginia at this point, quite possibly going away.

    With only FOURTEEN DAYS LEFT, is Ohio and Wisconsin next?

  6. 6.

    Southern Beale

    October 23, 2012 at 12:56 pm

    BREAKING: A federal appeals court has ruled that Indiana cannot withhold Medicaid funds from Planned Parenthood simply because it provides abortions.

  7. 7.

    MikeJ

    October 23, 2012 at 12:56 pm

    In light of recent experience, perhaps Romney thinks we should build a successor to the Akron.

    I actually worked at a place in London (in Angel, IIRC) that had a blue plaque out front telling about the zeppelin raid that had damaged the building.

  8. 8.

    schrodinger's cat

    October 23, 2012 at 12:56 pm

    We need more horses and elephant, and mules, also too.

  9. 9.

    Omnes Omnibus

    October 23, 2012 at 12:57 pm

    As I noted last night, our Navy is desperately short of triremes. I worry for our safety.

  10. 10.

    WereBear

    October 23, 2012 at 12:58 pm

    I am still swinging between appalled and hysterical over Romney’s debate performance. My fifth grade teacher would fail him in geography, and he was sweating like a Turkish Bath fan.

  11. 11.

    Political Observer

    October 23, 2012 at 12:59 pm

    Last time you morons said Obambi won the debate before it was even held. Predictable.

  12. 12.

    Cris (without an H)

    October 23, 2012 at 12:59 pm

    Time for the Apple iPad Mini event, which is being livestreamed. Coincidentally, my shuffle play just landed on Rufus, “Tell Me Something Good.”

  13. 13.

    jgaugust

    October 23, 2012 at 12:59 pm

    @Political Observer: How’s the chicken feeling these days? Still just as tight as before?

    Trolls need banning or mockery. I vote for mockery.

  14. 14.

    Bulworth

    October 23, 2012 at 12:59 pm

    All I know is Spending Is Out Of Control and Government Spending Doesn’t Create Jobs and we have a Debt Crisis but the Defense Sequestration Cuts are going to kill jobs and kill us all and Obama wants to cut defense spending to 0 and the deficit and the problem is too much spending and the Bush Tax Cuts Must Be Extended and Mitt will cut tax deductions which aren’t at all the same thing as increasing taxes, except if Democrats cut tax deductions in which case such cuts would be the Biggest Tax Increase In History.

  15. 15.

    [email protected]

    October 23, 2012 at 12:59 pm

    This approached Tim F.’s levels of pithy. Well done, sir.

  16. 16.

    schrodinger's cat

    October 23, 2012 at 12:59 pm

    @WereBear: It seemed like he was melting. Is the Romneytron made of wax?

  17. 17.

    Cris (without an H)

    October 23, 2012 at 1:00 pm

    @Political Observer: I’ve decided you’re not actually DougJ, because DougJ’s trolling is kind of funny. You’re not even that.

  18. 18.

    Anonymous

    October 23, 2012 at 1:00 pm

    @Political Observer:

    I remember when you were less obviously a troll.

  19. 19.

    ThatLeftTurnInABQ

    October 23, 2012 at 1:01 pm

    I want Project Orion funded and I want it now. How can we be in a position to retaliate against aggression from the Moons of Jupiter if we don’t have heavy lift intra-planetary transport capacity?

  20. 20.

    Omnes Omnibus

    October 23, 2012 at 1:03 pm

    @Anonymous: I note with interest that you do not say you remember when he used to be cool.

    The ballista gap must not increase!

  21. 21.

    elmo

    October 23, 2012 at 1:04 pm

    Why has this supremely idiotic notion of having the UN or the World Court arrest Ahmadinijad not made Mitt a national laughingstock today? I mean seriously WTF? That’s a five-year-old’s answer: “Have the police arrest the bad man.”

    First of all, arrest him for what?
    Second, arrest him WITH what?
    Third, arrest him WHERE? In New York, when he addresses the UN? OH THAT’S A GOOD IDEA. Fucking bedwetters won’t even let us try Gitmo detainees there because of scary scary terra, so let’s arrest a sovereign head of state there instead. Blowback? What’s that?
    And fourth – Since when do Republicans even BELIEVE in the World Court?

    WTF, over?

  22. 22.

    rlrr

    October 23, 2012 at 1:04 pm

    @ThatLeftTurnInABQ:

    We need to fund a massive starship construction program so we’ll be prepared to face oncoming Klingon threat.

  23. 23.

    Chyron HR

    October 23, 2012 at 1:06 pm

    Rember, predicting Obama winning a debate the day beforehand is bad, but predicting a ROMNEY LANDSLIDE IN NOVEMBER is an act of real true genius.

  24. 24.

    SatanicPanic

    October 23, 2012 at 1:07 pm

    @elmo: It makes sense when you take into account the power they believe the UN has. Black Hellicopterz!

  25. 25.

    rlrr

    October 23, 2012 at 1:07 pm

    @elmo:

    First of all, arrest him for what?

    Verbal genocide…

  26. 26.

    burnspbesq

    October 23, 2012 at 1:07 pm

    My thinking (such as it is) is that you can have as many bayonets as you want, if I can have one M249 LMG. We’ll see who walks away from that fight.

  27. 27.

    kindness

    October 23, 2012 at 1:07 pm

    Maybe the Navy needs to count every Zodiac they have in order to appease that asshole Mittens.

    The thing that rubs me the wrong way most? That damn smirk on Mitt’s face. It looks so contemptuous & fake.

    @jgaugust: I vote to ignore the idiot. Let him go pleasure himself somewhere else.

  28. 28.

    Omnes Omnibus

    October 23, 2012 at 1:08 pm

    @rlrr: A better personal hygiene regime should solve the Klingon threat.

  29. 29.

    Bulworth

    October 23, 2012 at 1:08 pm

    @elmo: Mittens said that? The same World Court and UN that conservative teabags think have a double super secret plan to take away American Freedom and Liberty?

  30. 30.

    Poopyman

    October 23, 2012 at 1:08 pm

    @rlrr: Three. We need three starships: one for the One percenters, one for the Middle Class, and one for the hired help.

  31. 31.

    Cris (without an H)

    October 23, 2012 at 1:09 pm

    ha ha, i got punked

    Live streaming video requires Safari 4 or later on Mac OS X v10.6 or later; Safari on iOS 4.2 or later. Streaming via Apple TV requires second- or third-generation Apple TV with software 5.0.2 or later.

    So, no video for me from work.

  32. 32.

    rlrr

    October 23, 2012 at 1:09 pm

    @kindness:

    Maybe the Navy needs to count every Zodiac they have in order to appease that asshole Mittens.

    That’s sort of how wingnuts come up with numbers showing the Chinese navy is larger than the US. They count river patrol and coastal defense boats…

  33. 33.

    Rock

    October 23, 2012 at 1:10 pm

    PO may be a troll, but he’s right about the polls. So I’d withhold the mockery.

  34. 34.

    Napoleon

    October 23, 2012 at 1:10 pm

    @MikeJ:

    Hey, the Airdock is still in existance in Akron (it has only been open twice to the public, last time in 1992 when candidate Clinton spoke there – I attended).

  35. 35.

    PurpleGirl

    October 23, 2012 at 1:10 pm

    @schrodinger’s cat: And camels. Didn’t one president want to use camels for pack animals in the southwest?

  36. 36.

    Southern Beale

    October 23, 2012 at 1:10 pm

    I just read that the Log Cabin Republicans have endorsed Mitt Romney.

    I swear to God, Republicanism must be a disease that appeals to masochists and psychopaths. Yes, let’s endorse the guy who doesn’t believe gays should have the same rights as everyone else, who thinks it’s fine for an employer to fire someone because of their sexual orientation over the guy who actually has ended discrimination against gays in the military. Yeah, let’s do that.

    Dumb fucks.

  37. 37.

    dmsilev

    October 23, 2012 at 1:10 pm

    @burnspbesq:
    “Whatever happens, we have got.
    The Maxim gun, and they have not”

  38. 38.

    Villago Delenda Est

    October 23, 2012 at 1:11 pm

    Has anyone who passed geography 101 informed fuckstick that the Brits (our ally, of course, until fuckstick pisses them off again) control Gibraltar, therefore the Iranian “route to the sea” through Syria is limited, at best, as a strategic avenue to invading South Carolina?

    The moron actually makes the deserting coward look only dull normal.

  39. 39.

    Poopyman

    October 23, 2012 at 1:11 pm

    In PO’s defense (*) consider what he has to work with. At least Bahgdad Bob had some semplance of an army (for a while) to make his claims about. PO’s got Mittens nuthin’.

    (* = I can’t believe I said that)

  40. 40.

    burnspbesq

    October 23, 2012 at 1:12 pm

    @Rock:

    Let’s see, one the one hand we have 538 and Princeton, with demonstrated track records, while on the other, we have one idiot troll.

    Call me crazy, but I’m believing 538 and Princeton.

  41. 41.

    Scout211

    October 23, 2012 at 1:12 pm

    @Southern Beale:

    thank you for posting this

  42. 42.

    Maude

    October 23, 2012 at 1:12 pm

    @elmo:
    That was just so strange. Why bring that up? The US isn’t a memeber and after Bush, he brings this up?

  43. 43.

    mdblanche

    October 23, 2012 at 1:12 pm

    Do we still have our autogyros? I need to mail something to Siam little later.

  44. 44.

    Omnes Omnibus

    October 23, 2012 at 1:12 pm

    @burnspbesq: Machine guns do jam. Absent that, yeah.

  45. 45.

    Villago Delenda Est

    October 23, 2012 at 1:13 pm

    @Southern Beale:

    They love their money, the gay mammonist fucks, more than they do their freedom.

    They are wretched creatures who deserve no quarter.

  46. 46.

    schrodinger's cat

    October 23, 2012 at 1:13 pm

    @elmo: Andrew Thespian Sullivan says that Mitt looked Presidential in yesterday’s debate while Obama’s first debate performance was catastrophic.
    Beltway pundits seem to have in place an affirmative action program for the Republican candidate for President.

  47. 47.

    Michael Bersin

    October 23, 2012 at 1:13 pm

    We’ve been hearing the same thing from right wingnut republicans for months:

    Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): comparing apples to navel oranges (February 16, 2012)

    I am particularly worried about the current coast defense monitor gap.

  48. 48.

    Belafon (formerly anonevent)

    October 23, 2012 at 1:14 pm

    @jgaugust: I hear PO likes it with a bayonet, which is why he’s so sad about Obama’s ridicule of Romney.

  49. 49.

    schrodinger's cat

    October 23, 2012 at 1:14 pm

    @PurpleGirl: Good idea, will be good for all the action in the Middle East.

  50. 50.

    Ruckus

    October 23, 2012 at 1:14 pm

    Sooner, how could you suggest that we go back to using the BAR?
    As a heavy automatic rifle designed for support fire, the M1918 was not fitted with a bayonet mount and no bayonet was ever issued.

  51. 51.

    rlrr

    October 23, 2012 at 1:15 pm

    @mdblanche:

    The Prussian consulate anxiously awaits your letter via aeromail.

  52. 52.

    schrodinger's cat

    October 23, 2012 at 1:16 pm

    Has Mitt checked whether the Army Corps of Engineers have enough slide rules?

  53. 53.

    Shawn in ShowMe

    October 23, 2012 at 1:16 pm

    How many election cycles does Wang have to out-predict Silver before he becomes the new gold standard?

  54. 54.

    Villago Delenda Est

    October 23, 2012 at 1:16 pm

    @rlrr:

    We should toss in Coast Guard cutters, and police river patrol ships.

    Plus the Bush Crime Family’s cigarette boat fleet.

  55. 55.

    ThatLeftTurnInABQ

    October 23, 2012 at 1:16 pm

    @rlrr:

    That’s sort of how wingnuts come up with numbers showing the Chinese navy is larger than the US. They count river patrol and coastal defense boats…

    Well fuckme, if we are counting those then our tally will also have to include every aluminium-bottomed boat that some county sherrif’s office from Louisiana has ever contracted Sons of Guns to mount multiple crew-serviced weapons on. I always did wonder what the fuck they needed those floating fire platforms for? Now I know. It is to repel the Red Chinese Navy when they invade our swamps and rivers under the cover of docking up to the Keystone Pipeline. The sneaky bastards!

  56. 56.

    rlrr

    October 23, 2012 at 1:17 pm

    @Villago Delenda Est:

    While we’re at it, we should include the navies of our close allies.

  57. 57.

    gogol's wife

    October 23, 2012 at 1:17 pm

    @jgaugust:

    I vote for banning. It’s gotten really tired.

  58. 58.

    Omnes Omnibus

    October 23, 2012 at 1:17 pm

    @Michael Bersin: A monitor lizard gap? Bring on the gila monsters!

  59. 59.

    SatanicPanic

    October 23, 2012 at 1:17 pm

    @Rock: oh groan

  60. 60.

    The Dangerman

    October 23, 2012 at 1:18 pm

    I’m feeling a bad mixture of 1992 and 2000 coming; 1992, when it was the economy, stupid, over a recently victorious War President and 2000, it all coming down to 1 state. Let’s face it, almost 50% of the country are seriously stupid fucks (hi and pie, PO) that can’t recall that it was the Republicans that fucked things up from 2001-2009 and acted to keep things fucked up from 2009 to current so they could get rid of the sitting President.

    If I were the rest of the world, after electing Bush twice (well, maybe once) and perhaps Romney once, I’d be looking at the USA with a mixture of curiosity and disgust.

  61. 61.

    prufrock

    October 23, 2012 at 1:18 pm

    And while we’re on the subject, we should bring back the Chauchat if we can’t have the BARfor the ground forces.

    And this is the one time I’ve seen the BAR mentioned in the same sentence as the Chauchat where the adjective “sucks” isn’t modifying “Chauchat” and “awesome” isn’t modifying “BAR”.

  62. 62.

    Villago Delenda Est

    October 23, 2012 at 1:19 pm

    @burnspbesq:

    Never bring a knife to a gunfight.

    Just sayin’.

    Something fuckstick would know if he had spent his missionary years in the Mekong Delta, not in Paris.

  63. 63.

    Mouse Tolliver

    October 23, 2012 at 1:20 pm

    Don’t you love how implying Iran is landlocked and that it shares a border with Syria no longer counts as major, disqualifying gaffe. It’s the Palin effect. If a Republican can get through a debate without shitting his pants on live television, the press will say he held his own.

  64. 64.

    rlrr

    October 23, 2012 at 1:21 pm

    @Villago Delenda Est:

    “You’re forgetting the French were hostile back then.”
    — actual conservative talking point (seriously)

  65. 65.

    Hill Dweller

    October 23, 2012 at 1:21 pm

    @schrodinger’s cat: Sullivan and the rest of the apologists can try to spin that debate, but Willard was pummeled, and looked ignorant in the process.

    The beltway narrative is morphing from Willard looked presidential(which is being relentlessly mocked) to Obama was too hard on him.

  66. 66.

    bubba

    October 23, 2012 at 1:21 pm

    Shorter Joe Scarborough:
    Yea, Romney was outclassed, formulaic and Romney seemed to be reciting scripts rather than debating foreign policy…..
    But flip flopping to the middle, which is how I think he REALLY feels, was enough to get my vote.

  67. 67.

    ? Martin

    October 23, 2012 at 1:22 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus: Do we not still equip our troops with ka-bars? Or are Republicans arguing that unless the knife is mounted at the end of your gun it’s completely useless?

  68. 68.

    burnspbesq

    October 23, 2012 at 1:22 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus:

    Take care of your weapon and it’ll take care of you.

  69. 69.

    mdblanche

    October 23, 2012 at 1:24 pm

    @Southern Beale: “We endorse the guy who didn’t punch us and cut off our hair. In fact, nobody punched us or cut off our hair. We walked into a door and tripped on a razor.”

    @Villago Delenda Est: That will be cold comfort when the Iranians bypass Gibraltar all together and come by way of the Persian Gulf.

  70. 70.

    Villago Delenda Est

    October 23, 2012 at 1:24 pm

    @rlrr:

    Well, we can’t do that if fuckstick gets elected. He’s already managed to piss off our closest ally. Give him a week, and he’ll piss off all the rest.

  71. 71.

    Napoleon

    October 23, 2012 at 1:25 pm

    @Shawn in ShowMe:

    ?

    He hasn’t out predicted Silver as far as anyone can tell. Silver hit on all but one state last time and every senate seat. Plus they deal in percentages. In order to tell if they are off you need to build up enough results over time to see if they correspond to the percentages.

  72. 72.

    schrodinger's cat

    October 23, 2012 at 1:25 pm

    @Hill Dweller: Oh noes pooh liddel Willard’s fee fees were hurt. Also too, MoDo will have another Obambi column coming up soon.

  73. 73.

    qwerty42

    October 23, 2012 at 1:26 pm

    One of Sullivan’s readers makes an interesting point wrt the World Court:

    …
    Second, his team talk about the “World Court” but it does not exist to handle criminal charges against individuals, but rather, for the most part, claims amongst states.They mean the International Criminal Court – but wait: the G.O.P. has bitterly opposed the ICC ab initio. Now Romney wants to use it?! That’s a big policy reversal.
    …

    So, Romney is signaling a new GOP stand for the ICC?

  74. 74.

    rlrr

    October 23, 2012 at 1:26 pm

    Maybe Romney will emulate his hero, Reagan and bring back battleships, which have been obsolete since the early days of WWII.

  75. 75.

    ? Martin

    October 23, 2012 at 1:26 pm

    @rlrr: Only Republicans are serious enough about foreign policy to still be afraid of the French.

  76. 76.

    Michael

    October 23, 2012 at 1:27 pm

    @Shawn in ShowMe: Well, to be fair, Wang is predicting 290 EVs with 90% or certainty, whereas Nate is predicting 291 EVs, but only with 70% certainty. Not a ton of daylight between their actual predictions for the outcome, though. 1 EV.

  77. 77.

    scav

    October 23, 2012 at 1:28 pm

    @bubba: Because the random flops which I can interpret as agreeig with my prejudices he totally means, unlike everything else out of his mouth or flopping pale scaley bod.

  78. 78.

    Ash Can

    October 23, 2012 at 1:28 pm

    @elmo: Between that and the creative geography with Iran and Syria, I can’t believe anyone is treating him like a serious candidate for national office today. At least the NYT reacted appropriately. For cripes sake, I remember when Gerald Ford sunk himself in a debate with Carter by misspeaking about Soviet domination in Eastern Europe, then doubling down on it when given the chance to correct himself. The guy got excoriated for it. The fact that the national news media as a whole isn’t reacting today by alternating between uproarious laughter and declarations that Romney’s candidacy is dead shows just how far this nation has fallen.

  79. 79.

    rlrr

    October 23, 2012 at 1:28 pm

    @Michael:

    I’m guessing that the one EV is from Nebraska.

  80. 80.

    Anonymous

    October 23, 2012 at 1:28 pm

    @Napoleon:

    He hasn’t out predicted Silver as far as anyone can tell.

    This isn’t quite right:

    http://election.princeton.edu/2010/11/05/howd-we-do-2010-edition/

    http://election.princeton.edu/2008/11/11/post-election-evaluation-part-2/

    I was impressed the first time I saw this. Wang’s model builds in less uncertainty than Silver’s; it seems to be bearing results.

  81. 81.

    Omnes Omnibus

    October 23, 2012 at 1:29 pm

    @burnspbesq: I am an artilleryman. It is always the guns for me.

  82. 82.

    Soonergrunt

    October 23, 2012 at 1:29 pm

    @burnspbesq: But you can’t mount a bayonet on an M-249!
    Pwned! Suxxors, LOL!

  83. 83.

    ranchandsyrup

    October 23, 2012 at 1:30 pm

    Can we have Sir Bedomir increase the production of giant wooden badgers?

  84. 84.

    j

    October 23, 2012 at 1:30 pm

    Early voting started around here yesterday. I figured 10:30 would be a good time to go. WRONG! The line at the Courthouse was out the door, so I decided to try a different location. That place was packed too! It took me 45 minutes to get a machine (there were about 20 machines there). Unfortunately, they only had those touch screen slot machines, so who know who or what I voted for> The election judge told me that they couldn’t possibly keep ballots for every precinct there, so I could either like it or lump it. (Not her words, but I got the idea.)

    The person in line ahead of me was talking to an election judge, and said he tried to vote on Monday but left because it was too crowded then too, and he had to get back to work. Even with the torrential downpour we had yesterday!

  85. 85.

    cckids

    October 23, 2012 at 1:30 pm

    @Hill Dweller:

    The beltway narrative is morphing from Willard looked presidential(which is being relentlessly mocked) to Obama was too hard on him.

    This. Also, “Romney was so agreeable”. Seems to be shorthand for how bipartisany he’d be. On Andrea Mitchell right now, some R-Money flack is insisting that “these have been the governor’s positions all along”, and she is just letting him talk. I watched for a while to see if she’d cut him off at the knees, but no.

    No matter how cynical & jaded about the media I get, it seems there is still a further depth to which they can sink.

  86. 86.

    Villago Delenda Est

    October 23, 2012 at 1:30 pm

    @Mouse Tolliver:

    Well, Iran does share a border with Syria. Through it’s Shiite controlled Iraqi surrogate. Thanks to the fine efforts of the deserting coward and Darth Cheney.

  87. 87.

    JGabriel

    October 23, 2012 at 1:31 pm

    __
    __
    Soonergrunt @ Top:

    Ever since the incredibly short-sighted decision to decommission and sell off the last of our Fleet Colliers, USS Nero (AC-17) in 1922, we’ve never had as many Colliers as we did during World War I.

    ‘Tis true. We must have more boats to protect the Syrian Canal. ‘Twas a terrible error to leave the Route to the Sea open to the Mohammedan hordes of Persia. The Qajars and their tribes of dark savage merchants must never be allowed to dominate our sea trade! Pax Britannia!

    .

  88. 88.

    MikeJ

    October 23, 2012 at 1:31 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus: They do add dignity to a vulgar brawl.

  89. 89.

    CW in LA

    October 23, 2012 at 1:33 pm

    @Mouse Tolliver: Hell, the Rethug could spend the full 90 minutes losing control of each of his bodily functions, concurrently and then simultaneously; the talking heads would still insist he looks “presidential”. Pres. Obama is less sharp than expect for one stinkin’ debate and it’s WE’RE ALL GONNA DIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE…

    @gogol’s wife:

    I vote for banning. It’s gotten really tired.

    Agreed.

  90. 90.

    KG

    October 23, 2012 at 1:33 pm

    @burnspbesq: it’s not even that… the idea that Obama has lost North Carolina and Florida “for sure” is just flat wrong. In the last 10 days, we have 5 polls, 2 show Obama up, three show Romney up, all have it within five points. Three such polls in North Carolina, two for Romney, one for Obama, the biggest lead is a Rassmussen poll showing Romney up 6 with a 4.5 MOE. We see the same thing in Colorado.

    In short, swing states are close.

  91. 91.

    Soonergrunt

    October 23, 2012 at 1:33 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus: well played, Sir. Well played.

  92. 92.

    Chris

    October 23, 2012 at 1:34 pm

    @Southern Beale:

    I’ve said many times that conservatism was a subject for psychology rather than politics.

  93. 93.

    ? Martin

    October 23, 2012 at 1:34 pm

    @cckids:

    Seems to be shorthand for how bipartisany he’d be.

    I noted to my son at that point in the debate that when you have an 80% Democratic legislature, it’s really easy to be bipartisan, because they’re going to do whatever the fuck they want and override your veto every time.

    That’s not bipartisanship – that’s getting rolled at every turn.

  94. 94.

    Rita R.

    October 23, 2012 at 1:35 pm

    @Southern Beale:

    This is what I don’t get about the Log Cabin Republicans —

    If you’re gay and you’re a Republican, okay, maybe you put your conservative economic views, for instance, or foreign policy views ahead of equality for all people regardless of their sexuality, even though it hurts your own interests. And that’s fine. Everyone gets to self-sabotage and be self-defeating if they want to be.

    But what I don’t understand is why go the next step and form or be part of an organization explicitly based on being gay, if you’re going to back candidates opposed to policies that stand up for the rights of gay people? What’s the point of your group then? You might as well be the Republican Lovers of Cats or Conservative Quilters of America for all the influence being gay has on your stances. Puzzling….

  95. 95.

    Bubblegum Tate

    October 23, 2012 at 1:35 pm

    We must close the dirigible gap!

  96. 96.

    Citizen_X

    October 23, 2012 at 1:35 pm

    I hope that Mr. Romney will, when he becomes President, outfit our Negro Cavalry with enough bayonets to repel the Dothraki hordes. I also hope he appoints Helen of Troy to be the Secretary of the Navy. That woman knows how to inspire shipbuilding!

    And then, should the Persians finally gain a route to the sea via Syria, our new dreadnoughts shall bottle them up right quick. VICTORY!

  97. 97.

    Soonergrunt

    October 23, 2012 at 1:37 pm

    @Ruckus: My shame, Sir. Springfield rifles for everyone!

  98. 98.

    chopper

    October 23, 2012 at 1:37 pm

    @Political Observer:

    it’s okay, scrot. there are plenty of tards out there living real kick-ass lives.

  99. 99.

    Paul

    October 23, 2012 at 1:37 pm

    @Rock:

    PO may be a troll, but he’s right about the polls. So I’d withhold the mockery

    Really? You know what; even people in foreign countries show more respect for our President than PO does.

    Last time you morons said Obambi won the debate before it was even held. Predictable.

    President Obama – I know he is not white, but is it so fricking difficult as an American to call him President Obama? Show some damned respect for the office!

    Until then he deserves to be mocked.

  100. 100.

    Suffern ACE

    October 23, 2012 at 1:39 pm

    @qwerty42: only for heads of state who are holocaust deniers. And say mean things.

  101. 101.

    GregB

    October 23, 2012 at 1:39 pm

    Obama is at it again. Bowing is a sign of weakness!

    Please stop bowing!

  102. 102.

    dmsilev

    October 23, 2012 at 1:39 pm

    @Bubblegum Tate: Romney’s blimp nearly crashed the other day. He’s not helping.

  103. 103.

    Cacti

    October 23, 2012 at 1:39 pm

    @Political Observer:

    is Ohio and Wisconsin next?

    I don’t know?

    Is they?

  104. 104.

    Hill Dweller

    October 23, 2012 at 1:39 pm

    @cckids: I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, MSNBC is every bit as bad as the other cable networks during the day.

    Bashir, Madddow, Hayes and MHP are the only good shows on that network, but the rest of the time they try compensating for having four liberals on air.

  105. 105.

    Soonergrunt

    October 23, 2012 at 1:39 pm

    @prufrock: Just give me a walking base of fire weapon from the WWI era. That’s the goal, not whether or not it’s a good idea itself, you know.

  106. 106.

    Shawn in ShowMe

    October 23, 2012 at 1:40 pm

    @Napoleon:

    2008

    Wang: Obama 364 EV, McCain 174. Error:1 EV.
    Nate: 348.5 EV. Error: 18.5 EV.

    2004
    Wang: Kerry 252 EV, Bush 286 EV. Error: none
    Nate: He was knee deep in baseballs stats

  107. 107.

    KG

    October 23, 2012 at 1:40 pm

    @Rita R.: I think the idea is to change minds from the inside of the party. Sort of a “look, we agree on this and this, now just hear me out on this other thing.” There’s some logic in that.

  108. 108.

    mdblanche

    October 23, 2012 at 1:40 pm

    @Hill Dweller: “The beltway narrative is morphing from Willard looked presidential(which is being relentlessly mocked) to Obama was too hard on him.”

    Yeah, that’s a winner. If I were them, I’d go with something less whiny. If he can’t stand the pressure from Black Metrosexual Abe, how is he going to stand the pressure from the Bond villain who rules Russia or his inscrutable Oriental business partners in China?

  109. 109.

    Villago Delenda Est

    October 23, 2012 at 1:41 pm

    The problem our navy has is not enough 70 gun ships of the line.

    Also, too, the press needs to be reimplemented, at once, in major port cities.

  110. 110.

    Mnemosyne

    October 23, 2012 at 1:41 pm

    @Political Observer:

    So the New York Giants didn’t really win the Super Bowl because some people predicted that they would win before the game happened?

  111. 111.

    Richard

    October 23, 2012 at 1:42 pm

    Our Navy really needs more galleons.

  112. 112.

    rlrr

    October 23, 2012 at 1:42 pm

    The US Navy’s first aircraft carrier was a converted collier.

  113. 113.

    Cacti

    October 23, 2012 at 1:43 pm

    Here’s a word problem for your arithmetic and naval history-challenged Republican friends…

    “Mitt has 50, three-masted ships of the line. Barack has 1 nuclear powered super carrier. Who wins a naval engagement between them?”

  114. 114.

    Cermet

    October 23, 2012 at 1:43 pm

    @The Dangerman: What is it with you people? The key is the swing states and no matter what you think, the odds are far in President Obama’s favor still; the tightening of the race is normal and was never an issue except for people who want it in the bag ahead of time. If the turn out is good, Obama remains President. Get a grip panicking rabbits. People who believe in the President aren’t too worried at all so follow their example.

    As for PO, a better handle would be BO becuse I can smell his fear like romney’s in last night’s debate – unbelievable now you people get the vapors when the swing states are still solid for the President. Please!

  115. 115.

    Rita R.

    October 23, 2012 at 1:43 pm

    @Mouse Tolliver:

    The soft bigotry of low expectations.

    Also Halperin’s “Gang of 500” are a bunch of unprincipled hacks with overblown egos who think this is all a political game instead of real life with serious consequences because it will never, ever effect them in their cushy one percenter perches.

  116. 116.

    Rich (in name only) in Reno

    October 23, 2012 at 1:44 pm

    “I’d make sure that Ahmadinejad is indicted under the Genocide Convention. His words amount to genocide incitation.”

    Um, Mitt? Would this be carried out by the same World Court that one of your top “special foreign policy advisers,” John “Yosemite Sam” Bolton, openly derides as “illegitimate,” and the previous Administration you have harvested talent from contemptuously ignored for eight years?

    Oh, and Mitt? Pretty much everyone besides you, FOX News, and Ahmadinejad himself, knows that he’s a little man in a big suit who wields limited power, and that Ayatollah Ali Khamenei runs Iran, not Lil’ Mahmoud.

    And you’ve just given Ahmadinejad a big PR boost. Real shrewd move, there, Mitt.

  117. 117.

    Cacti

    October 23, 2012 at 1:46 pm

    @dmsilev:

    Romney’s blimp nearly crashed the other day

    Hey!

    That’s not a very nice way to talk about Mrs. Romney.

  118. 118.

    Citizen_X

    October 23, 2012 at 1:46 pm

    @mdblanche:

    when the Iranians bypass Gibraltar all together and come by way of the Persian Gulf.

    Wait, what? When did the Persians get their own Gulf? BLAST YOU AND YOUR WEAKNESS, OBAMA!

  119. 119.

    gwangung

    October 23, 2012 at 1:47 pm

    The beltway narrative is morphing from Willard looked presidential(which is being relentlessly mocked) to Obama was too hard on him.

    Jeezus. Don’t we want a President who is tough in the world arena? WHat a jackass sentiment.

    Between that and the creative geography with Iran and Syria, I can’t believe anyone is treating him like a serious candidate for national office today.

    We shouldn’t forget his boners about the USSR and Czechoslovakia. One gaffe I can see overlooking, but a WHOLE SERIES???

    Idiiots.

  120. 120.

    Cermet

    October 23, 2012 at 1:47 pm

    @Rita R.: Simple – these thug gays have to prove to everyone their own self hatred.

  121. 121.

    Soonergrunt

    October 23, 2012 at 1:47 pm

    @Bubblegum Tate: Well, Rmoney certainly fucked us there, didn’t he?

  122. 122.

    Chris

    October 23, 2012 at 1:47 pm

    @gogol’s wife:

    I vote for banning. It’s gotten really tired.

    I’m Chris and I approve this message. Seriously.

  123. 123.

    schrodinger's cat

    October 23, 2012 at 1:48 pm

    @Cacti: Was it wearing a statement necklace with beads, if not that was not Queen Ann.

  124. 124.

    Maude

    October 23, 2012 at 1:48 pm

    @Ash Can:
    The media has hit bottom and I bet it stays there. It’s now infotainment without the info. They need a horse race or some kind of drama.
    It has really gotten infantile.
    I liked Obama’s bit about this isn’t a game of battleships. Oh, ouch.

  125. 125.

    Soonergrunt

    October 23, 2012 at 1:49 pm

    @Cacti: Rarely is the question asked: Is our trolls learning?

  126. 126.

    Yutsano

    October 23, 2012 at 1:49 pm

    @gwangung: The only conclusion to draw is they want an idiot at the helm so all the real important policy can be made behind the scenes. Willard is more than willing to act like a figurehead as long as his ego stays stroked and his “blind trust” keeps growing.

    (Note to self: never mention stroking and Willard. Ever again.)

  127. 127.

    Suffern ACE

    October 23, 2012 at 1:50 pm

    I read an article the other day about our new stealthy destroyers…designed to leave very little wake and give off the radar signature of a canoe. They only cost seven billion per ship. Which is about six Cowboy Stadiums or 5 Yankee stadiums. They must be made of diamonds.

  128. 128.

    nancydarling

    October 23, 2012 at 1:51 pm

    I just posted this on my local state blog and it seems relevant here.

    When I was recently in Austin, my brother posed this question to me regarding President Obama:

    —

    “Is he wise?”

    __

    The following dialogue between Robert Wright and Peter Kornbluh of the National Security Archives draws parallels between the Cuban Missile Crisis and our current situation with Iran.

    __

    http://bloggingheads.tv/videos/11976

    Ask yourself who you would rather have had in charge during those harrowing October days, President Barack Obama or Shapeshifter Mitt Romney. If you want to learn more about the history of those days, the above link is a good place to start as more records have recently been released, thanks to the family of Bobby Kennedy.

    President Kennedy was wise and his was a lonely decision. Bobby, Adlai Stevenson and McNamara were pretty much his only allies. Air Force General Curtis LeMay wanted to invade Cuba, even if it meant using nuclear weapons. At the time, we had 15,000 or so troops based in Berlin—surrounded by 300,000 Soviet troops who would have immediately retaliated. Missiles would have been launched toward the USA and enough would have gotten through to kill at least 40 million Americans. (My brother, in the Army at the time and bivouacked at a race track in Florida, most certainly would have been toast, along with his buddies, in a day or two.)

    As an aside, the character played by George C. Scott in “Dr. Strangelove”, General Buck Turgidson, was based on LeMay. I can still see and hear him waxing poetic about how those B-52’s could fly so low under the radar, they would roast chickens in the barnyard if that is what it took to deliver their payload. The humor in the movie is as dark as it gets, but it is hilarious. If you’ve never seen it, go rent it.

    To sum up, all you Romney voters should ask yourselves this question:

    “Is Mitt Romney wise?”

    He certainly lacks any iota of resoluteness, given he often changes his positions weekly, if not daily.

    Based on foreign policy alone, I know who won’t give me nightmares to disturb my sleep. If you are voting for Romney, you may be voting for someone who will start the WWIII that President Kennedy, in his wisdom, avoided.

  129. 129.

    Soonergrunt

    October 23, 2012 at 1:51 pm

    @rlrr: See, even the Navy was in on the conspiracy to cripple our naval coaling capabilities!

  130. 130.

    Paul

    October 23, 2012 at 1:51 pm

    @Hill Dweller:

    The beltway narrative is morphing from Willard looked presidential(which is being relentlessly mocked) to Obama was too hard on him.

    Are they joking? This is the same Mitt Romney who wasn’t exactly playing nice during the GOP primaries. Why was it OK for him to be hard against his opponents, but not OK for Obama to be tough on Romney himself? Seriously, this must be a joke.

    By the way, don’t we want a President who is tough?

  131. 131.

    The Dangerman

    October 23, 2012 at 1:51 pm

    @Cermet:

    …the odds are far in President Obama’s favor still…

    Don’t get me wrong; I agree, Obama is still the favorite to win…

    …but I see this coming down to Ohio or Florida – and I’ve seen that movie before. The originals sucked; the sequel will suck worse.

    I’ll use Silver’s numbers and say Obama is a 2 out of 3 favorite. Sounds about right. But, that’s playing Russian Roulette with 2 bullets loaded and how it is that close is really, really sad.

    ETA: Fuck! The Digital Dungeon for a gambling reference. LET ME OUT!

  132. 132.

    Mnemosyne

    October 23, 2012 at 1:52 pm

    @Rich (in name only) in Reno:

    “I’d make sure that Ahmadinejad is indicted under the Genocide Convention. His words amount to genocide incitation.”

    Okay, I just realized that Romney mocked the idea that an American-made anti-Muslim video could incite people to violence when Benghazi happened, but now he’s saying Ahmadinejad should be prosecuted for saying anti-Semitic things in public because they might incite people to violence?

    I realize I should be used to the very high level of doublethink and hypocrisy from these guys, but what the fucking fuck, anyway?

  133. 133.

    Cermet

    October 23, 2012 at 1:52 pm

    @KG: Those are NOT swing states. So, the issue is not Fl/NC but the real swing states: OH, NH, IA,CO,NV,WI,VA and except for two, the President is leading in all the rest and has a current narrow lead in VA (which is really too close.) The Pres has a firm hold on the real key – OHIO!

    Yeah, romney is not just in trouble but losing.

  134. 134.

    scav

    October 23, 2012 at 1:54 pm

    Well for that matter, I’ve suddenly noticed our utter and complete lack of the Biblically approved weapon, the slingshot! No Wonder we’re losing in the Holy Land(tm).

  135. 135.

    Chris

    October 23, 2012 at 1:54 pm

    @The Dangerman:

    If I were the rest of the world, after electing Bush twice (well, maybe once) and perhaps Romney once, I’d be looking at the USA with a mixture of curiosity and disgust.

    I’ve been wondering for a while how long it would take before the rest of the world decided the U.S. was a sinking ship and they’d better untie themselves from it before it takes them down with it. Granted, many of the rest of the world’s elites share our MOTU’s delusions, but the public, not as much.

    I think they’ve been hoping that the Bush years were a 9/11-induced aberration and that Obama hailed the return of sanity, but a Romney presidency might just convince them that the aberration is actually the norm.

  136. 136.

    Rita R.

    October 23, 2012 at 1:55 pm

    @KG:

    Yeah, I could understand that, but that’s not what they do. They’re backing candidates opposed to gay rights. So what’s the point?

    It strikes me almost as a vanity thing. Like, You can’t define me. I’m an individual! Look at me, I’m gay but I’m a Republican!

    Or maybe it’s just this:

    @Cermet:

    Simple – these thug gays have to prove to everyone their own self hatred.

  137. 137.

    Ruckus

    October 23, 2012 at 1:55 pm

    @schrodinger’s cat:
    Beltway pundits seem to have in place an affirmative action program for the Republican candidate for President.

    They don’t have it in place.

    They are the affirmative action program for conservatives.

  138. 138.

    nancydarling

    October 23, 2012 at 1:56 pm

    Temporarily lost my mind and forgot how to do b-quotes.

  139. 139.

    Soonergrunt

    October 23, 2012 at 1:56 pm

    @Yutsano: (Note to self: never mention stroking and Willard. Ever again.)

    I’d tell you to flog yourself in penitence, but I know how you people* are. You’d enjoy it too much.

    *I’m referring here to IRS employees, of course.

  140. 140.

    Chris

    October 23, 2012 at 1:57 pm

    @Cacti:

    RARELY is the question asked; is our Political Observers learning?

  141. 141.

    Ruckus

    October 23, 2012 at 1:59 pm

    @Mouse Tolliver:
    If a Republican can get through a debate without shitting his pants on live television, the press will say he held his own.

    And he did hold his own if he didn’t shit his pants.

    Not quite the standard I go for in a presidential candidate but there you go.

  142. 142.

    scav

    October 23, 2012 at 1:59 pm

    @Suffern ACE: Sorry, I can’t help wondering how many canoes are out patrolling war zones and wondering if that might not be a tell. (I know what they really mean, but my way is funnier and I need the giggle). “Enign! There’s that dratted canoe again!”

  143. 143.

    Napoleon

    October 23, 2012 at 2:01 pm

    @Shawn in ShowMe:

    Both Silver and Wang deal in probabilities. For example both are likely to tell you that the chance of a 1 coming up on a die that is thrown is 1/6. If it is thrown and the 1 comes up that does not make them wrong since you would need a statistically significant number of throws to test their predictions.

    But for people like yourself who do not understand that a single data point is good enough.

  144. 144.

    gelfling545

    October 23, 2012 at 2:01 pm

    @schrodinger’s cat:

    looked Presidential

    That means “is a white guy”, doesn’t it?

  145. 145.

    Maude

    October 23, 2012 at 2:02 pm

    @Ruckus:
    What does “Look Presidential”” mean?

  146. 146.

    Calouste

    October 23, 2012 at 2:02 pm

    @rlrr:

    With Romney, there will be no close allies. (cf. Romney’s disaster world tour of three white, Judeo-Christian,right-leaning, European countries)

  147. 147.

    Hill Dweller

    October 23, 2012 at 2:02 pm

    @Paul: Let them keep running with the ‘Obama was mean to Willard’ narrative. It’s a tacit admission Willard was pummeled and looked weak. For a Confidence Man like Willard, looking weak is devastating.

  148. 148.

    TOP123

    October 23, 2012 at 2:04 pm

    @? Martin: The bayonet is more useful when forming infantry squares to counter the Sassanid cataphracts.

  149. 149.

    schrodinger's cat

    October 23, 2012 at 2:06 pm

    @gelfling545: Probably, I for one thought that Obama looked Presidential, because he is the President while Romney looked like a melting wax figurine from the House of Wax.

  150. 150.

    Ruckus

    October 23, 2012 at 2:08 pm

    @Soonergrunt:
    No way man, it’s ball and powder flintlock muskets! None of them short rifles that can’t shoot a turkey at 25 feet without blowing it all to hell.

  151. 151.

    schrodinger's cat

    October 23, 2012 at 2:09 pm

    BTW on a completely shallow note, is it just me or does anyone else think that Ann Romney’s godawful “statement” necklaces, do nothing for her and just make her look like she is trying too hard.

  152. 152.

    Cacti

    October 23, 2012 at 2:10 pm

    @Cermet:

    Yeah, romney is not just in trouble but losing.

    There really is no path to victory left for Romney, barring some unforseen last minute move in the state polling. The only true tossups at this point are CO and VA. NC and FL lean toward Romney, and NH, OH, IA, WI, and NV all lean Obama.

    Even if Mitt pulls out both Colorado and Virginia, he still loses 282-256.

  153. 153.

    Ruckus

    October 23, 2012 at 2:10 pm

    @KG:
    Logic maybe but success? No.

  154. 154.

    Cacti

    October 23, 2012 at 2:11 pm

    @Maude:

    What does “Look Presidential”” mean?

    Middle-age looking white dude with broad shoulders, and a full head of hair.

  155. 155.

    Betsy

    October 23, 2012 at 2:13 pm

    @flukebucket: D’feat of D’duct went over D’fense before D’tail.

  156. 156.

    blingee

    October 23, 2012 at 2:13 pm

    The PEC also predicts 290EV today but they came about it in a more scientific and pragmatic way imho.
    http://election.princeton.edu/history-of-electoral-votes-for-obama/
    Ie, by mostly ignoring national polls. I think they have been very critical of Nate for his insistence on including national polls including all the BS Republicans ones. I will be curious how it all pans out. I think Nate may take a hit on credibility after this election.

    They are saying 53 Dem senators. I still think we can get 54.

  157. 157.

    Calouste

    October 23, 2012 at 2:13 pm

    @Rita R.:

    I assume the Log Cabin Republicans are mostly about hooking up.

  158. 158.

    Omnes Omnibus

    October 23, 2012 at 2:15 pm

    @scav: Trebuchets are basically slingshots.

  159. 159.

    Cacti

    October 23, 2012 at 2:18 pm

    @Calouste:

    I assume the Log Cabin Republicans are mostly about hooking up.

    The LCR think of themselves as conservative males who just happen to enjoy buttsecks. “Gays” are the twinks and rentboys of the world.

  160. 160.

    Kay S

    October 23, 2012 at 2:18 pm

    Calling for more coal-carrying ships is just another Romney pander to his buddies in Big Coal…! Who represents the bayonet lobby? (We know who lobbies Mitt for the horsies.)

  161. 161.

    Ruckus

    October 23, 2012 at 2:19 pm

    @Maude:
    You talkn to me?

    I’ll answer your question anyway.
    The current one, President Obama. He looks and acts presidential. In the last 30 years? Actually I’d give the same answer. In the last 60? Not too many actually.

  162. 162.

    Soonergrunt

    October 23, 2012 at 2:20 pm

    @TOP123: And you never really know when you’re going to need to do that these days.

  163. 163.

    Paul in KY

    October 23, 2012 at 2:21 pm

    I would like a dreadnought or two. One of those cool looking ones with guns jutting out from all over the place, in about 5 or 6 different calibers.

    Also, jodpurs.

  164. 164.

    Paul in KY

    October 23, 2012 at 2:23 pm

    @burnspbesq: You don’t bring a bayonet to an M249 LMG fight (unless you tape a bayonet to a hellfire missile or two).

  165. 165.

    Shawn in ShowMe

    October 23, 2012 at 2:24 pm

    @Napoleon:

    If it is thrown and the 1 comes up that does not make them wrong since you would need a statistically significant number of throws to test their predictions.

    Which goes back to my original question. How many times would be statistically significant? And if the answer is in the realm of what I think it is, we’d all be dead by then, right?
    So clearly that isn’t the measure by which Silver and Wang’s accuracy is being judged by the many readers who cite them.

  166. 166.

    Maude

    October 23, 2012 at 2:24 pm

    @Ruckus:
    I agree with you and yeah, I was talking to you. Romney looked like a scared boy.

  167. 167.

    The Moar You Know

    October 23, 2012 at 2:27 pm

    I can smell his fear like romney’s in last night’s debate

    @Cermet: People talk about how Romney’s internals must be good. No way. That guy was terrified not ten minutes in. He knows he’s probably going to lose anyway, but one good-sized fuckup from him and he’ll be more done than my toast.

    Which I prefer almost wholly black, like our President.

  168. 168.

    Maude

    October 23, 2012 at 2:27 pm

    @Cacti:
    I forgot about cable tv land. It used to be the Bush on aircraft carrier flight suit.

  169. 169.

    Hill Dweller

    October 23, 2012 at 2:28 pm

    Good ol’ Ron Fournier has a piece over at National Journal saying Obama won the third debate, but Willard won the “debate season”.

    So Willard’s campaign went 1-3 in the 4 debates, but they won the “season”. Now you see why Republicans can’t balance a budget.

  170. 170.

    MikeJ

    October 23, 2012 at 2:29 pm

    @The Moar You Know: And my Lambo I prefer blue.

  171. 171.

    Ruckus

    October 23, 2012 at 2:29 pm

    @Maude:
    Romney looked like a scared boy.
    It’s always nice when the outside reflects what the inside is. Makes it a lot easier to understand the situation.

  172. 172.

    Maude

    October 23, 2012 at 2:33 pm

    @Ruckus:
    Yes.

  173. 173.

    Napoleon

    October 23, 2012 at 2:39 pm

    @Hill Dweller:

    Good ol’ Ron Fournier

    He is one of the 2 or 3 people in the MSM (which does not include Fox) that is all but a plant by the RNC.

  174. 174.

    Bobby Thomson

    October 23, 2012 at 2:42 pm

    @Mouse Tolliver:

    Don’t you love how implying Iran is landlocked and that it shares a border with Syria no longer counts as major, disqualifying gaffe. It’s the Palin effect. If a Republican can get through a debate without shitting his pants on live television, the press will say he held his own.

    Fuckin’ A. That’s far worse than what Jerry Ford said off the cuff about Eastern Europe not “being dominated” by the USSR. He was thinking of psychological domination and didn’t realize how his answer would sound.

    This was an actual rehearsed attack line by Romney, and it’s completely wrong. But Ford’s mistake was a crippling error and Romney’s shoulders looked white presidential same thing.

  175. 175.

    Bobby Thomson

    October 23, 2012 at 2:49 pm

    @Cacti: Is our trolls learning?

  176. 176.

    Tonybrown74

    October 23, 2012 at 2:57 pm

    Romney looked like he was trying his best to hold in a mean shit or fart. That’s how “nervous” (if I’m going to be generous) he looked.

    Presidential, my juicy black ass!

  177. 177.

    El Cid

    October 23, 2012 at 3:00 pm

    Romney didn’t say that Syria was Iran’s only route to the see; it’s just that Iran looks forward every year to a nice couple of days driving across Iraq and Syria, taking in the sights.

  178. 178.

    Roger Moore

    October 23, 2012 at 3:01 pm

    @Paul in KY:

    I would like a dreadnought or two. One of those cool looking ones with guns jutting out from all over the place, in about 5 or 6 different calibers.

    Strictly speaking “Dreadnoughts” were the ones that abandoned the idea of having guns of many different calibers sticking out from all over. One of the things that made the HMS Dreadnought revolutionary was that it abandoned the mix of calibers in favor of an “all-big-gun” layout, with all the main armament being the same caliber. They did have some 3″ guns for dealing with small boats (and later some AA guns) but nothing like 5 or 6 different calibers./pedant

  179. 179.

    Mnemosyne

    October 23, 2012 at 3:02 pm

    @Mouse Tolliver:

    Wasn’t “a path to the sea” one of the obsessions that people always had about the Soviet Union, that the Soviets were constantly seeking a warm-water port and would conquer other countries to get one? Though it’s probably even scarier to realize that Romney was just recycling an old Cold War line about the Soviets and thinking he could just re-apply it to Current Enemy X.

  180. 180.

    Roger Moore

    October 23, 2012 at 3:13 pm

    @Mnemosyne:
    You might be able to make a plausible case that the Iranians are worried that all their ports are on the Persian Gulf rather than the Gulf of Oman, which makes them vulnerable to a major sea power like the US closing the Straights of Hormuz to their shipping. If they’re trying to get their oil out in the face of an embargo, they might be able to ship it to the Med through their patsies, Iraq and Syria. I don’t think it’s what Mitt meant, but it’s a vaguely plausible, not completely stupid alternative to believing that Iran is landlocked.

  181. 181.

    Omnes Omnibus

    October 23, 2012 at 3:15 pm

    @Mnemosyne: Ah yes, memories of my Soviet foreign policy classes back in the 80s. IIRC, many aspects of SFP were continuations of two traditional Russian FP goals: a buffer zone to protect it from central European powers and a warm water port.

  182. 182.

    LAC

    October 23, 2012 at 3:16 pm

    @Political Observer: worse news…even after Obama wins reelection, your dumbass will still be posting here under another name

  183. 183.

    Gravenstone

    October 23, 2012 at 3:17 pm

    @elmo:

    Why has this supremely idiotic notion of having the UN or the World Court arrest Ahmadinijad not made Mitt a national laughingstock today?

    Mittens and his merry crew of morons masquerading as advisers clearly didn’t think their little fantasy all the way through. I mean, assume they somehow empower the WC or UN or whomever with that power, what stops that same body from arresting Bush/Cheney et alia for their proven genocidal invasion of Iraq?

  184. 184.

    Citizen_X

    October 23, 2012 at 3:17 pm

    @Hill Dweller: Oy. .250 a winning season ain’t.

  185. 185.

    gene108

    October 23, 2012 at 3:22 pm

    @CW in LA:

    Pres. Obama is less sharp than expect for one stinkin’ debate and it’s WE’RE ALL GONNA DIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE…

    That’s because of the MSNBC freakout after the debate.

    Watched Joe Scarborough this morning and he said, even though Romney lost 2 or 3 debates, Romney won the “debate season” based on his “tone”.

    He had Michael Steele on, who agreed wholeheartedly.

    I’m just sayin’, the era of objective reality is over. We live in George Castanza’s world now: It’s not a lie, if you (or the people you convince) believe it’s true.

  186. 186.

    flukebucket

    October 23, 2012 at 3:22 pm

    @Betsy:

    LOL! I have been trying to come up with some rhyme such as that for the DeMint / D’Souza team for over a week but I can’t make anything work.

  187. 187.

    miserybob

    October 23, 2012 at 3:23 pm

    Spirit Airlines… today you win the Internet.

    “Leave your horses and bayonets at home. We can SAVE our way out of this!”

    Hahahaha!

  188. 188.

    Roger Moore

    October 23, 2012 at 3:24 pm

    @Gravenstone:

    I mean, assume they somehow empower the WC or UN or whomever with that power, what stops that same body from arresting Bush/Cheney et alia for their proven genocidal invasion of Iraq?

    Because we’re the good guys. SATSQ.

  189. 189.

    Cacti

    October 23, 2012 at 3:24 pm

    First the Republicans came for Biology, but I didn’t care, because I wasn’t a biologist.

    Then they came for Arithmetic, but I didn’t care, because I wasn’t a mathematician.

    Then they came for Geography, but I didn’t care, because I wasn’t a geographer.

    Then I woke up one day, and crops were being watered with Brawndo.

  190. 190.

    Tonal Crow

    October 23, 2012 at 3:45 pm

    “That’s not true: it’s a Mitt!”

    .
    — Overheard over breakfast

  191. 191.

    Brachiator

    October 23, 2012 at 3:48 pm

    Some posters have been bemoaning the lack of foreign policy substance in the debate. nothing to appeal to supposed high-information voters and observers. But here is some foreign policy stupidity from pundit Peter Beinart, from Sully’s site and his own Daily Beast posting:

    … what made Moscow and Berlin genuine competitors was their economic strength. The true successor to those once fearsome powers is not the mud-hut totalitarianism of al Qaeda, but China, and perhaps India and Brazil, countries that are becoming economic models for billions in the poor world. How the United States, its own might sapped by the financial crisis and wars of imperial overstretch, meets the challenge posed by countries that are converting their economic success into geopolitical power, is the defining foreign policy question of our time. Not only wasn’t that question answered tonight, it wasn’t even posed.

    This is beyond stupid. The Germany of the 1930s was not even remotely an economic power. The USSR of the Cold War era was largely an economic failure that used totalitarianism to punch above its fighting weight.

    The dismissal of Al Qaeda just misses the point.

    But the larger issue is that there is nothing, nothing, absolutely nothing that says that China, Brazil, or India will or should be viewed as antagonists. You don’t hear anyone with brains suggest that the UK, Germany or even Japan are inherently “against us” because of their economic successors.

    But some serious, supposedly high-information pundits have a primitive need to create enemies, especially when those potential enemies might theoretically cause the nonwhite poor to rise up and not simply demand their fair share, but assert a simple right to compete on an even playing field.

    So much for “serious” foreign policy discussion.

  192. 192.

    mds

    October 23, 2012 at 3:51 pm

    @Poopyman:

    @rlrr: Three. We need three starships: one for the One percenters, one for the Middle Class, and one for the hired help.

    As long as we load the One Percenters on the “B” Ark, and send it out first, I don’t have a problem with this plan.

    @qwerty42:

    So, Romney is signaling a new GOP stand for the ICC?

    Hmm. I originally figured that it was simply more of Mitt’s “Abruptly repudiate every modern Republican principle” strategery, since that’s been what’s worked for him. But when you put it that way, I wonder if it is actually a tell. If President Obama wins re-election, perhaps we’ll suddenly see the GOP become all outraged over putative “war crimes.” They’ve pretty much already pulverized irony’s corpse, so why not?

  193. 193.

    Yutsano

    October 23, 2012 at 3:53 pm

    @Soonergrunt: Wink wink nudge nudge. :)

  194. 194.

    Paul in KY

    October 23, 2012 at 3:59 pm

    @Roger Moore: That’s usually the kind of thing I say (ha, ha). You are correct, I should have said a pre-dreadnought.

  195. 195.

    Soonergrunt

    October 23, 2012 at 4:01 pm

    @Roger Moore: Well, when you think about the fact that Iran’s most likely course of action in the event of war is to close the straits of Hormuz themselves, and by so doing deny hundreds of miles of their coastline to access by the US Navy, and also to place an economic choke hold on several of our regional allies, I don’t think they really think that much about Syria as a path to the sea.

  196. 196.

    Hill Dweller

    October 23, 2012 at 4:04 pm

    @gene108: I caught the Maddow and Nicole Wallace segment on Kouric’s show, and Wallace was peddling that bullshit. Maddow smacked her down, calling Willard absolutely clueless on foreign policy, and ripping him for the Syria is Iran’s route to the sea nonsense.

  197. 197.

    gene108

    October 23, 2012 at 4:11 pm

    @Cacti:

    Even if Mitt pulls out both Colorado and Virginia, he still loses 282-256.

    I think the broader issue at play is despite Mitt loss and McCain’s loss in 2008, Republicans will carry 20 or so states, so they can still be jackasses and have a shot at becoming President in 2016, if they can tip a few of the “swing states”.

    We really need a historic beat down of a Republican candidate in a Presidential election to maybe force a change in the politics of this country.

  198. 198.

    Suffern ACE

    October 23, 2012 at 4:15 pm

    @scav: yes. I’m guessing that is one of the reasons the navy went from ordering thirty down to ordering three. Yes, there is the cost. But there is also the whole “no one is fooled by canoes going 30 knots”. “Hey. Lets attack that aircraft carrier. It’s sitting there all by itself, only protected by a group of canoes!”

  199. 199.

    Omnes Omnibus

    October 23, 2012 at 4:19 pm

    @Soonergrunt: I have just been in a FB discussion with someone who suggested that Syria provides a safe harbor for Iranian ships in the Med. Therefore, it gives them access to a SEA.

  200. 200.

    Comrade Scrutinizer

    October 23, 2012 at 4:21 pm

    @Maude: In my lifetime, Eisenhower, Kennedy, Reagan, Bush the semi-Lucid, Clinton (on good days), and Obama had the “Presidential” look. Which is not to say that they were all great Preznits; they just fit my central casting idea of “Presidential” in appearance.

  201. 201.

    mds

    October 23, 2012 at 4:25 pm

    @Suffern ACE:

    “Hey. Lets attack that aircraft carrier. It’s sitting there all by itself, only protected by a group of canoes!”

    The ruse could work, if enough people believed we actually had a 1913-era navy.

  202. 202.

    Omnes Omnibus

    October 23, 2012 at 4:31 pm

    @scav: Inconceivable!

  203. 203.

    Patricia Kayden

    October 23, 2012 at 4:37 pm

    @jgaugust: Trolls need ignoring.

    So glad that the debates are over. President Obama won 2/3 decisively and hopefully he’ll get a slight bounce as we move towards November 6th.

    Early voting begins this Saturday in Maryland. Exciting!

  204. 204.

    Mnemosyne

    October 23, 2012 at 4:37 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus:

    Therefore, it gives them access to a SEA.

    And of course that person meant an additional “sea,” right? Because Iran already has access to the Arabian Sea directly from their own coastline. Plus the Indian Ocean.

    Unless this is some weird conspiracy-theory-that-cannot-be-named that the Iranians are somehow going to cross both Iraq and Syria so they can get to the Mediterranean Sea and conquer Europe, I still don’t get it.

  205. 205.

    Omnes Omnibus

    October 23, 2012 at 4:44 pm

    @Mnemosyne: At this point, in the discussion, I pleaded workload and backed slowly away while showing my hands to indicate I meant no harm. No reaching someone like that.

  206. 206.

    Shawn in ShowMe

    October 23, 2012 at 4:48 pm

    @gene108:

    We really need a historic beat down of a Republican candidate in a Presidential election to maybe force a change in the politics of this country

    If we had an electorate that was wise enough to turn their backs on the Republican candidate, we wouldn’t need a change in the politics of this country. First you execute a program of cultural transformation, then you get the votes. Republicans understand this.

  207. 207.

    Patricia Kayden

    October 23, 2012 at 4:50 pm

    @Paul: Here here!! Why do some people feel that PO deserves respect when he gives none? All he’s here to do is mock our President.

  208. 208.

    Paul

    October 23, 2012 at 4:54 pm

    @gene108:

    Watched Joe Scarborough this morning and he said, even though Romney lost 2 or 3 debates, Romney won the “debate season” based on his “tone”.

    Oh, that’s funny. I remember clearly when Joe Scarborough after the 2004 Cheney/Edwards VP debate claimed that Cheney “destroyed” Edwards.

    Cheney’s “tone” in that debate wasn’t exactly VP worthy.

    What the hell does hypocritical Joe S mean by tone?

  209. 209.

    Patricia Kayden

    October 23, 2012 at 4:54 pm

    @Hill Dweller: You missed Sharpton, O’Donnell and Matthews. Perhaps on purpose?

  210. 210.

    Patricia Kayden

    October 23, 2012 at 5:07 pm

    @Calouste: Actually, I thought they were instrumental in the repeal of DADT.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States

    I’m surprised that they’re endorsing Romney since many in the GOP would probably push him to reinstate DADT and support DOMA.

    http://www.zimbio.com/Gay+and+Lesbian+Rights/articles/E13Zh-lFXlW/GOP+Still+Pushing+Reinstate+DADT+Romney+Wins

  211. 211.

    celticdragonchick

    October 23, 2012 at 5:18 pm

    @Hill Dweller:

    Sullivan and the rest of the apologists can try to spin that debate, but Willard was pummeled, and looked ignorant in the process.

    You should read Sullivans live blog of the debate before you make statements about what you think he said. Sully thought Mittens got blown out of the water.

  212. 212.

    Soonergrunt

    October 23, 2012 at 5:23 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus: Did you point out to this person that the argument s/he just advanced means that the stupidity is systematic?
    That Rmoney said it in the debate is laughable but not something one would linger on. Point, laugh, and move on. That this person has actually taken the time to think through a statement like “Syria gives Iran access to a sea” only makes normal people wonder what the fuck is wrong with Republicans as a group, and that it wasn’t some slip of the tongue but a systemic stupidity that allows such thoughts to flourish.
    Best off to just say “yeah, he blew that one, but he was right about the need to get involved in Syria for other reasons, such as the need to protect Israel from the proliferation of armored vehicles and MANPADS systems to Hezbollah that would occur if the Syrian government fell, as well as the resulting instability in Lebanon.”
    Instead, you get a dumbass statement that “Syria gives Iran access to a sea” and that person just permanently becomes marked as paste-eating stupid.

  213. 213.

    Soonergrunt

    October 23, 2012 at 5:24 pm

    @mds: Yeah, but our lack of Colliers (as I noted up top) puts paid to that ruse.

  214. 214.

    celticdragonchick

    October 23, 2012 at 5:25 pm

    @rlrr:

    Maybe Romney will emulate his hero, Reagan and bring back battleships, which have been obsolete since the early days of WWII.

    Not exactly obsolete. They had to change roles…and the role of shore bombardment hasn’t gone away. The Zumwalt destroyer was supposed to fill that gap. In any event, the 4 Missouri class BB’s where brought back to form the core of the new surface action groups that were meant to counter the Kirov class battle cruisers and assorted escorts that were expected to challenge control of the Atlantic and possibly cut off the convoy life line we would be sending to Europe in the event of a war. The Kirov’s were/are nasty surface ships and rather then try to make a new class to counter them, we merely updated something we already had which also had a shit load of armor to withstand anti ship missiles.

  215. 215.

    catclub

    October 23, 2012 at 5:30 pm

    @Mnemosyne: “cross both Iraq and Syria so they can get to the Mediterranean Sea and conquer Europe, I still don’t get it.”

    Isn’t that what the Persians did? When Homer was singing Ulysses?

  216. 216.

    Omnes Omnibus

    October 23, 2012 at 5:33 pm

    @Soonergrunt: No, I did not. I did suggest that, if he believed hard enough, it would come true.

  217. 217.

    Democrat Partisan Asshole

    October 23, 2012 at 5:38 pm

    BTW on a completely shallow note, is it just me or does anyone else think that Ann Romney’s godawful “statement” necklaces, do nothing for her and just make her look like she is trying too hard.

    @schrodinger’s cat: And to continue on that shallow note, she dresses like a Midwesterner. I’d expect something a bit more fashionable for the wife of one of the lesser members of our 1%. Doesn’t Mitt want to go anywhere in life? He won’t chained to a spouse that looks like she’s dressed by the local upholsterer.

  218. 218.

    burnspbesq

    October 23, 2012 at 5:43 pm

    @Soonergrunt:

    But you can’t mount a bayonet on an M-249!

    I’m reasonably confident that if I have an M249 and know how to use it, no enemy will get close enough so that a bayonet would be useful.

  219. 219.

    burnspbesq

    October 23, 2012 at 5:48 pm

    @mds:

    If President Obama wins re-election, perhaps we’ll suddenly see the GOP become all outraged over putative “war crimes.”

    Perhaps. But I doubt that their sudden crush on the ICC will extend to dropping Cheney and Addington off in The Hague.

  220. 220.

    Maude

    October 23, 2012 at 5:52 pm

    @Comrade Scrutinizer:
    Warren Harding was a classic presidential look.
    The man who really looked like he was from central casting as a Senator was Albert J. Beverage from Indiana.
    I also agree with your take on who looks presidential.
    FDR had his picture taken a few days before he died. He looked presidential. He did all they way through his presidency.

  221. 221.

    Democrat Partisan Asshole

    October 23, 2012 at 6:04 pm

    FDR had his picture taken a few days before he died. He looked presidential.

    @Maude: True. He also looked like he was about to die. Which he did. Blood pressure of 300 over 150, it’s amazing he lived as long as he did.

  222. 222.

    Death Panel Truck

    October 23, 2012 at 6:08 pm

    @MikeJ: They did build a successor to the Akron. It was called the Macon.

  223. 223.

    Humanities Grad

    October 23, 2012 at 6:14 pm

    @celticdragonchick:

    Minor point of order. Those were the Iowa-class battleships, of which the USS Missouri was one. But the Iowa was the lead ship of the class.

  224. 224.

    Citizen Alan

    October 23, 2012 at 6:46 pm

    @gene108:

    We really need a historic beat down of a Republican candidate in a Presidential election to maybe force a change in the politics of this country.

    If Obama pulls it out this year, I think we’ll get that in 2016. Biden will probably not run for president, which means we’ll have a vigorous primary campaign on the Dem side leading to the best possible candidate rather than a legacy. On the other side, the Teatards will finally get the candidate they want/deserve, probably Rick Santorum. And the Dem will beat him like a rented mule. And then, by 2020, a big chunk of the Teatards will be dead and the Republicans will have to become something … sensible. Probably resulting in all the Blue Dog types moving back to that side in exchange for the GOP becoming less religio-fascist.

  225. 225.

    TenguPhule

    October 23, 2012 at 7:10 pm

    And then, by 2020, a big chunk of the Teatards will be dead and the Republicans will have to become something … sensible.

    Point of order, facts clearly not in evidence.

  226. 226.

    Lojasmo

    October 23, 2012 at 7:52 pm

    @Political Observer:

    is Ohio and Wisconsin next?

    Fucking grammar, how does they work?

  227. 227.

    Lojasmo

    October 23, 2012 at 7:56 pm

    @Political Observer:

    Last time you morons said Obambi won the debate before it was even held. Predictable.

    Actually, last time I said President Obama won the debate, it was after he curbstomped mitt in the second debate.’

    (gotta feed the trolls sometimes folks. SHe’ll be gone November sixth.)

  228. 228.

    jefft452

    October 23, 2012 at 9:53 pm

    @gene108: “…have a shot at becoming President in 2016, if they can tip a few of the “swing states”.”

    But that’s the fly in the ointment right there-If they can’t tip a few of the “swing states” this year, what would enable them to do it 4 years from now?

  229. 229.

    fuckwit

    October 23, 2012 at 11:06 pm

    I like Nate Silver’s stuff.

    But I have to ask, why doesn’t TPM use it?

    I also have to ask, WHAT THE FUCK IS JOSH MARSHALL SMOKING OVER THERE?

    Their numbers make no fucking sense. It’s as if they get their statistics from Reice Preibus’s Twitter feed.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • OzarkHillbilly on Sunday Morning Open Thread: Chef José Andrés (Apr 2, 2023 @ 8:26am)
  • Edmund dantes on Late Night Open Thread: Same Bullsh*t, Different Decade (Apr 2, 2023 @ 8:26am)
  • schrodingers_cat on Late Night Open Thread: Same Bullsh*t, Different Decade (Apr 2, 2023 @ 8:25am)
  • WaterGirl on Sunday Morning Garden Chat: Living With Orchids (Apr 2, 2023 @ 8:24am)
  • lowtechcyclist on Late Night Open Thread: Same Bullsh*t, Different Decade (Apr 2, 2023 @ 8:24am)

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Seattle Meetup coming up on April 4!

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!