• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Something needs to be done about our bogus SCOTUS.

Anyone who bans teaching American history has no right to shape America’s future.

Hot air and ill-informed banter

When do we start airlifting the women and children out of Texas?

Black Jesus loves a paper trail.

Since when do we limit our critiques to things we could do better ourselves?

Do not shrug your shoulders and accept the normalization of untruths.

I see no possible difficulties whatsoever with this fool-proof plan.

Russian mouthpiece, go fuck yourself.

You can’t love your country only when you win.

It’s time for the GOP to dust off that post-2012 autopsy, completely ignore it, and light the party on fire again.

Come on, man.

Red lights blinking on democracy’s dashboard

rich, arrogant assholes who equate luck with genius

Sitting here in limbo waiting for the dice to roll

Schmidt just says fuck it, opens a tea shop.

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires

Prediction: the GOP will rethink its strategy of boycotting future committees.

if you can’t see it, then you are useless in the fight to stop it.

A Senator Walker would also be an insult to reason, rationality, and decency.

Wow, I can’t imagine what it was like to comment in morse code.

It’s the corruption, stupid.

Thanks to your bullshit, we are now under siege.

It’s always darkest before the other shoe drops.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Banned from twitter

Banned from twitter

by DougJ|  January 25, 20138:49 pm| 79 Comments

This post is in: Blogospheric Navel-Gazing

FacebookTweetEmail

I still have my @DougJBalloon twitter account but earlier today I created a different twitter account, also under the name Doug Jones, with a different handle and email account. The handle was @RobertEGalt.

I didn’t say anything too out there. I just said that Herman Cain was a great patriot and that Jesus would love bombing abortion clinics (in response to someone who said Jesus wouldn’t). But I was banned almost immediately. It seemed to happen right after I created this (a copper coin with “Who Is John Galt” engraved on it) as my avatar. Is it because that image is copyrighted?

Update. Here’s what I got for my explanation:

This account, @RobertEGalt, was suspended for sending multiple unsolicited mentions to other users.

Weird, I just did like three replies to people.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Friday Evening Open Thread: Do NOT Try This At Home…
Next Post: I shall endeavour to propitiate you with gifts »

Reader Interactions

79Comments

  1. 1.

    YoohooCthulhu

    January 25, 2013 at 8:52 pm

    Did you strip the metadata out of it? I could imagine the image includes “copyrighted by” somewhere and twitter has automated schemes to detect unauthorized images.

  2. 2.

    Doug Galt

    January 25, 2013 at 8:53 pm

    @YoohooCthulhu:

    Thanks, that’s probably it.

  3. 3.

    Joseph Nobles

    January 25, 2013 at 8:53 pm

    I wonder if you got spam-blocked. There’s a controversy raging about a right wing group of Twitter users that’s been issuing directives to spam-block people, which can sink a new account pretty quickly. Do you recall any direct mentions right before your account was blocked?

  4. 4.

    MikeJ

    January 25, 2013 at 8:54 pm

    I see plenty of people responding to an Aug2 tweet from Bryan Fisher making the same point about bombing abortion clinics. My guess is somebody complained. Yo would think there would be some sort of explanation, but it’s not really required.

    If you made it sound as if you were advocating bombing, that would probably get you booted.

  5. 5.

    gogol's wife

    January 25, 2013 at 8:54 pm

    Okay, but are you the one who’s tweeting under Shirley Temple’s name?

    http://gawker.com/5979028/shirley-temple-joins-twitter-is-immediately-asked-for-her-thoughts-on-honey-boo-boo

    (I promise this is my last comment to mention this.)

  6. 6.

    MikeJ

    January 25, 2013 at 8:56 pm

    @Joseph Nobles: http://thetrenches.us/2012/06/twittergulag-how-it-works-and-what-to-do/

  7. 7.

    Bubblegum Tate

    January 25, 2013 at 8:57 pm

    Well, clearly, it’s because Twitter is trying to silence conservatives–just like Google, according to various wingnut barometers.

  8. 8.

    Violet

    January 25, 2013 at 8:58 pm

    Can’t you contact Twitter about why you were banned? Other higher profile bannings, like @FiredBigBird after the Romney comment during the debate, were reinstated.

  9. 9.

    Maude

    January 25, 2013 at 9:01 pm

    @Doug Galt:
    That’s the reason. New avi, new tweet.

  10. 10.

    Baud

    January 25, 2013 at 9:03 pm

    multiple unsolicited mentions to other users.

    I’m proud to say I have no idea what that means.

  11. 11.

    RossInDetroit, Rational Subjectivist

    January 25, 2013 at 9:04 pm

    Twitter hates our freedoms.
    And it hates our way of life.

  12. 12.

    srv

    January 25, 2013 at 9:09 pm

    @Doug

    Why don’t you spread your wealth around and ask the commentariat artistes to create some DougJ trollwares?

  13. 13.

    Jerzy Russian

    January 25, 2013 at 9:09 pm

    Not that I have any moral standing to say this (given that I read this blog quite often), but it seems to be that you spend too much time on the internet. I must admit, however, that the time you do spend on the internet seems to be quality time, often with entertaining results.

  14. 14.

    redshirt

    January 25, 2013 at 9:10 pm

    #TwitterGulag

  15. 15.

    SiubhanDuinne

    January 25, 2013 at 9:11 pm

    It’s not like you’ve never been banned before, is it? Didn’t Sully, or Bobo, or someone at the WaPo or someone delete your account that time?

  16. 16.

    srv

    January 25, 2013 at 9:16 pm

    @Jerzy Russian: Doug is actually rich and paid Cole to start the site. But most of his posts are really a bot.

  17. 17.

    Jamie

    January 25, 2013 at 9:22 pm

    It seems to be pretty easy to get new accounts banned, if people bitch about them. Twitter appears to be very twitchy about it at the moment. Anecdata, but I know two people who were banned over relatively obscure technical arguments that couldn’t be farther from troll-farming. Honest, if somewhat solipsistic, opinions about writing code. You know, what Twitter engineers do for a living.

  18. 18.

    Maude

    January 25, 2013 at 9:23 pm

    @SiubhanDuinne:
    Yeah, but he wasn’t over the top. Mentions are when you put a link to someone else in your tweet.
    This is strange.
    It’s like what if Tunch wasn’t floofy.

  19. 19.

    ruemara

    January 25, 2013 at 9:24 pm

    I’ve never been banned from anything. Clearly, I’m not working hard enough.

  20. 20.

    max

    January 25, 2013 at 9:24 pm

    I didn’t say anything too out there. I just said that Herman Cain was a great patriot and that Jesus would love bombing abortion clinics (in response to someone who said Jesus wouldn’t).

    Good Lord, you are a real troo troll boy. I think I’ve been banned one time in almost 30 years, and I can’t even remember when that was. (To be fair, I remember almost being banned once on a different occasion, but that was another country type of electronic service, and besides the wench is dead I was 16 and not sober. And it was the 80’s and shut up, why were you sober during the 80’s?)

    I can’t decide whether I’m more amazed that you’re blithely swanning about intentionally trolling everyone in the universe and getting away with it, or that I’ve been banned so few times.

    Howabout @aynrhymeswithswine ?

    max
    [‘Livin’ on the edge.’]

  21. 21.

    MikeJ

    January 25, 2013 at 9:26 pm

    If you send unsolicited responses to people and they report you as spam, twitter will look at your history. One or two reports on a long standing account, no big deal. One or two reports on an account that has sent three tweets? You’ll get nuked.

  22. 22.

    Ben Cisco (onboard the Defiant)

    January 25, 2013 at 9:26 pm

    Bombing clinics? Probably wasn’t a winger that dropped a dime on you.

  23. 23.

    Omnes Omnibus

    January 25, 2013 at 9:27 pm

    @ruemara: Have you ever thought you were banned from being banned?

    I know a guy who is banned from Sweden because of a football incident. English, of course.

  24. 24.

    ruemara

    January 25, 2013 at 9:29 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus: I’d be quite sad if I was banned from being banned without some sort of notice. I mean, half of making trouble is the attention.

  25. 25.

    schrodinger's cat

    January 25, 2013 at 9:30 pm

    DougJ were you even nominated for the Moore Award this year?

  26. 26.

    Maude

    January 25, 2013 at 9:30 pm

    @MikeJ:
    That doesn’t make sense. People can reply to any public account.
    They don’t ask you to reply.
    I reply to sites like NASA all the time.

  27. 27.

    RossInDetroit, Rational Subjectivist

    January 25, 2013 at 9:30 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus:

    A US DUI will get you banned from Canada for a couple of decades. A lot of Americans will have to stay south of the border.

  28. 28.

    Violet

    January 25, 2013 at 9:31 pm

    @MikeJ: So is the lesson that for a new account you need to play nice at first?

  29. 29.

    Fwiffo

    January 25, 2013 at 9:32 pm

    It’s because you didn’t join #TGDN.

  30. 30.

    duckbilledplacelot

    January 25, 2013 at 9:32 pm

    This is why:

    Several French groups demanded in a recent lawsuit that Twitter identify anonymous users posting anti-Jewish messages they argued broke French law, which prohibits Holocaust denial and hate speech. A French judge agreed and ordered the company to reveal the users**

    Suddenly giving a huge publishing platform to bullshit hate speech probably seems like less of a great idea! At least I hope that’s why you got kicked off, you damn Brechtian malcontent.*

    *Takes one to know one.
    **Linky kicked first comment to moderation. Pulled from mashable article that quoted NYtimes.

    oh for fuck’s sake, moderate more moserately, sitebots!

  31. 31.

    Omnes Omnibus

    January 25, 2013 at 9:32 pm

    @ruemara: If it makes you feel any better, I don’t recall being banned from anything either. God knows, I have deserved it; I think I have simply charmed my way out of it. Or something.

  32. 32.

    MikeJ

    January 25, 2013 at 9:32 pm

    @Maude: And if they hit the “Report Spam” button, twitter will look at your track record. If you respond critically to people, they’re much more likely to hit the button.

  33. 33.

    Keith G

    January 25, 2013 at 9:33 pm

    Oh the humanity.

  34. 34.

    YellowJournalism

    January 25, 2013 at 9:34 pm

    @gogol’s wife: Please excuse me, I have to rush to Twitter and follow someone!

  35. 35.

    Faux News

    January 25, 2013 at 9:35 pm

    Those Statist Sheep simply can’t comprehend the brilliance and purity which is John Galt. Keep trying Doug!

  36. 36.

    RossInDetroit, Rational Subjectivist

    January 25, 2013 at 9:36 pm

    I’ve F-bombed other commenters on BoingBoing and got away with it. But I have a years-long record of sticking up for them so I have some cred banked.

  37. 37.

    kindness

    January 25, 2013 at 9:36 pm

    You’re a rebel Doug. Make us proud.

  38. 38.

    Maude

    January 25, 2013 at 9:39 pm

    @MikeJ:
    It happened right away. I doubt they hit the spam button.
    It’s a strange suspension.
    It said mention, not reply. That’s different. He didn’t mention anyone.

  39. 39.

    SiubhanDuinne

    January 25, 2013 at 9:40 pm

    @Maude:

    It’s like what if Tunch wasn’t floofy.

    Tunch was floofy in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be.

    I cannot imagine a floofylessTunch universe.

  40. 40.

    Narcissus

    January 25, 2013 at 9:40 pm

    The tweets were probably too coherent.

    Try spicing them with typographical errors and incorrectly spelled words.

  41. 41.

    schrodinger's cat

    January 25, 2013 at 9:41 pm

    @SiubhanDuinne: We have not witnessed his blessed floofiness on the blog, off late. I miss our blog deity.

  42. 42.

    mdblanche

    January 25, 2013 at 9:43 pm

    All right Doug, what did you really do?

  43. 43.

    Suffern ACE

    January 25, 2013 at 9:43 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus: I was supposed to be banned from a bar I once frequented, but the manager confused me with someone else and wrote his name down in the bar diary instead.

  44. 44.

    Maude

    January 25, 2013 at 9:44 pm

    @SiubhanDuinne:
    I don’t want to live in a universe where Tunch isn’t floofy.
    That one just teetered over the edge of sanity.

  45. 45.

    NotMax

    January 25, 2013 at 9:44 pm

    You intentionally posted things which were provocative and then became miffed when some one or other was provoked?

  46. 46.

    Liberty60

    January 25, 2013 at 9:47 pm

    Totally OT but I am wondering how the Black Metrosexual Jimmy Carter has suddenly morphed into Dr. Evil with superpowers like frickin lazerbeams shooting out of his eyes. Pew, Pew, Pew!

  47. 47.

    magurakurin

    January 25, 2013 at 9:57 pm

    @ruemara:

    I’ve never been banned from anything

    I got banned from my college campus. Persona Non Grata. I was allowed to go to class and then I was to leave the campus grounds. I walked before they made me run on that one. Left school after that term. They were going to kick me out formally if I hadn’t already left. Or so the Assistant Dean informed me in a private meeting.

  48. 48.

    magurakurin

    January 25, 2013 at 10:00 pm

    @efgoldman:

    They could always go to Ireland

    “yeah, well, they’re way ahead out there.”

  49. 49.

    Litlebritdifrnt

    January 25, 2013 at 10:00 pm

    @ruemara:

    Joe Scarborough blocked and banned me at about my second tweet to him, I took that as a badge of honor, I have been banned from so many birther sites I can’t even tell you. That too I take as a badge of honor. If bringing the truth to these fools is considered a banning offense then I am proud to do it.

  50. 50.

    Old Dan and Little Ann

    January 25, 2013 at 10:03 pm

    When my wife and I were first married and broke as shit I was delivering pizzas 3x a week for extra money. I was like 27 years old. One old creepy guy in a shady apartment I delivered to freaked me out. I refused to go in and stood way back from him exchanging money and pizza. The next weekend my boss at the Pizza shop told me while I was working that the same guy ordered another pizza. He requested that I definitely not deliver his pizza. That made me pretty happy. I may have even tweeted about it if it existed at the time and I was 13. That’s as close as a ban I’ve ever received.

  51. 51.

    Litlebritdifrnt

    January 25, 2013 at 10:04 pm

    @efgoldman:
    LOL me and the boss were discussing that only this week, issuing someone a license to drive drunk. If only. He suggested shutting down the roads from 11pm until 6am every night and only allowing drunk drivers on the roads at that time. Eventually they will all kill each other. Thinning of the herd as they say.

  52. 52.

    gogol's wife

    January 25, 2013 at 10:04 pm

    @YellowJournalism:

    I know, right?

  53. 53.

    magurakurin

    January 25, 2013 at 10:04 pm

    @efgoldman:

    No, just a mouthy heathen at a Jesuit school. They never proved it, but they were pretty sure it was me who wrote, “skull fuck the Pope” with the letters on the cafeteria menu board (it was me.) Also, too, the incident with a character named “Woody” who drank another person’s piss for the 50 some odd dollars I collected from people who ponied up to see it. That didn’t help. The numerous times I was caught drunk and disorderly and generally being a pain in the ass…also a factor. Plus the drugs and the drugs and…..the drugs.

    Luckily I sobered up a few years later.

  54. 54.

    ruemara

    January 25, 2013 at 10:04 pm

    *sulk* All I ever get is silence.

    @magurakurin: Jebus. I know it’s supposed to be bad, but it sure sounds more fun than I had at school. Apart from me liking school and studying but sometimes, I’d have liked to be like you, a hellion!

  55. 55.

    magurakurin

    January 25, 2013 at 10:08 pm

    @ruemara:

    It was fun. A young man’s game though. Glad I gave it all up. No future in it, really.

  56. 56.

    Regnad Kcin

    January 25, 2013 at 10:09 pm

    @magurakurin: That’s funny; we have a Dean Wormer at Faber College…

  57. 57.

    magurakurin

    January 25, 2013 at 10:14 pm

    @Regnad Kcin: no really,it’s the God’s honest truth. I saved the letter for many years, but it’s gone now. Me and my partner in crime both got letters in the mail on the same day. Persona non grata it called us. We loved it. It didn’t amount to much, we still went up to the campus pretty much every night. We were living off campus in an apartment. And we didn’t think we were all that bad because the guys from the ice hockey team who lived across the hall…jesus, they were fucking nuts. We were light weights compared to them. They were proud of us for getting that persona non grata letter though. They were older, seniors, we were sophmores.

  58. 58.

    magurakurin

    January 25, 2013 at 10:16 pm

    @efgoldman: I,luckily didn’t have to worry about the Draft. Ronnie Raygun was elected to his first term the November I entered college. A different kind of darkness was about to descend on the country….

  59. 59.

    SiubhanDuinne

    January 25, 2013 at 10:20 pm

    @Maude:

    I don’t want to live in a universe where Tunch isn’t floofy.
    That one just teetered over the edge of sanity gravity.

    Fix’d.

  60. 60.

    Anne Laurie

    January 25, 2013 at 10:36 pm

    @Jerzy Russian:

    Not that I have any moral standing to say this (given that I read this blog quite often), but it seems to be that you spend too much time on the internet. I must admit, however, that the time you do spend on the internet seems to be quality time, often with entertaining results.

    From Doug’s blog presence (all I know of the man), he’s a math professional and unmarried. And has a fondness for karaoke.

    Society’s better off when he’s busy on the internet, rather than IRL.

  61. 61.

    Regnad Kcin

    January 25, 2013 at 10:37 pm

    @magurakurin: Oof. I made it off AcPro, only to find myself on DiscoPro as a Jr.

    Thankfully, they seemed to think letting my walk in June of my Sr. year was the better part of valor.

    Good times.

  62. 62.

    Liberty60

    January 25, 2013 at 10:38 pm

    @magurakurin:
    Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son.

  63. 63.

    Mark S.

    January 25, 2013 at 10:53 pm

    In Soviet Union, Twitter trolls you.

  64. 64.

    jake the snake

    January 25, 2013 at 11:21 pm

    @Liberty60:
    I’ve always thought it was the only way to go through life.
    Or, as my father liked to say, “everything I like is illegal, immoral or fattening.”

  65. 65.

    Donut

    January 25, 2013 at 11:42 pm

    @NotMax:

    I thought more self-satisfied as opposed to miffed.

    This is all very “dog bites man,” ain’t it?

  66. 66.

    Omnes Omnibus

    January 25, 2013 at 11:42 pm

    @magurakurin: I apparently did it wrong (or right). I never got caught for the really bad things and the things foe which I got caught weren’t that bad. It probably helped that I went to college at a school that viewed personal behavior that did not harm others as one’s own business.

  67. 67.

    Pinkamena Panic

    January 25, 2013 at 11:55 pm

    You started by sending @s. That’s the sign of a spam account.

    Next time make more regular tweets betqeen the @s.

  68. 68.

    Jamie

    January 26, 2013 at 12:23 am

    @ Anne:

    We are all better off with DougJ in the world. I’d say that is already obvious, but apparently, it isn’t.

    Next time he needs a place to sleep in SF, he has one. ( As do the rest of you, and restaurant picks, too. The Bay has some great places.) Bad neighborhood, close to central transport. Takes me less than 30 to get to Berkeley campus, although I don’t do that so much these days. Also about 30 from SFO. And downtown is very walkable. And “bad” is very relative- Cleveland and Brooklyn fucked me up, physically, much more than the worst of SF ever has. One reason why I settled here.

  69. 69.

    mclaren

    January 26, 2013 at 12:49 am

    It’s possible that the thing about Jesus bombing abortion clinics might have had something to do with it.

    On the upside, the Department of Homeland Security is now investigating Jesus as a possible terrorist…

  70. 70.

    Kitty

    January 26, 2013 at 1:25 am

    you may have run afoul of the keyboard commandos at the #TGDN Twitter Gulag Defense Network.

  71. 71.

    xian

    January 26, 2013 at 1:39 am

    replying on twitter is one form of mention. any use of @ and a person’s username is a mention, whether it is a direct reply to another tweet or not.

  72. 72.

    Robert Waldmann

    January 26, 2013 at 2:00 am

    Twitter will probably un-ban you if you ask nicely in an e-mail. The frequent banning of new accounts for unsolicited tweeting is Twitter’s desperate effort to deal with a hug ad-bot infestation. They can’t sell advertising if fake users advertise without paying (also no one would use twitter if their stream was all unsolicited ads).

    Basically you will probably get un-banned if you take enough time to prove that yours is not one of thousands of accounts set up by some computer somewhere. I think the spam accounts set up by some non paying advertiser mention each other a lot.

    It seems that all new accounts are highly suspect — my guess is that a large fraction of new accounts are set up by spammers. My impression is that a few day of acting like a human makes twitter less trigger happy.

    Oh also follow @robertwaldmann . I am not a ‘bot.

  73. 73.

    Susan K of the tech support

    January 26, 2013 at 2:09 am

    I created an alternative twitter account that isn’t the usual…. I think the ratio of basic declarative statements to @replies or @mentions or links is important, especially if your total tweet count is low.

    So what you need are more Cheese Sandwich-style stwwets. Or even inflammatory tweets deriding certain politician/CEO 999 peeps.

    (I made the account to follow press briefings for Mars Curiosity, but tweeted in my usual fashion). And created a Storify story comprised of many people’s tweets and then mentioned to them that I had done so. Cue Twitter Suspicion meter. Account was suspended for unsolicited mentions, etc. I jumped thru some hoop to get it back, after which, I played it cool. Actually, I eventually stopped using that account.

  74. 74.

    opie_jeanne

    January 26, 2013 at 3:00 am

    @ruemara: I was banned from a family genealogy forum back in the ’90s.

    Bunch of old biddies.

  75. 75.

    Another Halocene Human

    January 26, 2013 at 4:11 am

    @max: I was sober during the 80s (underage) and it sucked.

  76. 76.

    Another Halocene Human

    January 26, 2013 at 4:13 am

    @opie_jeanne: Fuck yeah. My wife and I called them “tweeps” (this is before twitter & associated terms) because they were a bunch of old hens with a pecking order and not much better to say than “tweep, tweep, tweep”.

    Joke’s on them anyway because everything I told them would come to pass has. Everything.

  77. 77.

    Another Halocene Human

    January 26, 2013 at 4:16 am

    @Suffern ACE: I am laughing so hard right now. What a dirty turn! I hope you took full advantage of the error and the other slob deserved it!

  78. 78.

    polyorchnid octopunch

    January 26, 2013 at 8:44 am

    So, to sum up… when creating a troll account, don’t troll with it. At least, not right away.

    Wait, wait… I feel a song coming on!

    When rancor’s too much, troll with it, baby
    Don’t stop and lose your touch, oh no, baby
    But thick heads knocking on your door, give it some space before you score
    Get on through it, then troll with it, baby
    Tweeps’ll come and then slip away, you’ve gotta move, bring it back to stay

    Don’t just troll with it, baby, come on don’t just troll with it, baby
    You and me, troll with it, baby, hang out then just troll with it, baby

    The way that you snark is good as money
    I swear by stars above, sharp and funny
    People think you’re down and out, you show them what it’s all about
    You can make it, to troll with it, baby
    When this net turns it’s back on you, hang in then do that snark thing you do

    Don’t just troll with it, baby, don’t just troll with it, baby
    Come on don’t just troll with it, baby, hang out then just troll with it, baby

    Now there’ll be a day you’ll get there, baby, you’ll troll all day and night, you’ll rant baby
    You’ll leave courtesy behind, nothing but harsh times on your mind
    You can do it, troll with it, baby
    Then you’ll be snark man in a trice, it’s just a step up to artifice
    Then just troll with it, baby, then just troll with it, baby
    you ess poli, just troll with it, baby, hit tee-cot and just troll with it, baby

    With apologies to Steve Winwood and his Songwriting Committee

    :D

  79. 79.

    maus

    January 26, 2013 at 8:30 pm

    @3:

    I wonder if you got spam-blocked. There’s a controversy raging about a right wing group of Twitter users that’s been issuing directives to spam-block people, which can sink a new account pretty quickly

    This, the right-wingers reported you as a spammer.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

2023 Pet Calendars

Pet Calendar Preview: A
Pet Calendar Preview: B

*Calendars can not be ordered until Cafe Press gets their calendar paper in.

Recent Comments

  • mrmoshpotato on Respite Open Thread: *Legendary* Bucket-List Outing (Jan 27, 2023 @ 7:06am)
  • PST on Respite Open Thread: *Legendary* Bucket-List Outing (Jan 27, 2023 @ 7:00am)
  • kalakal on Respite Open Thread: *Legendary* Bucket-List Outing (Jan 27, 2023 @ 6:57am)
  • eclare on On The Road – Steve from Mendocino – French Basque Country #7 (Jan 27, 2023 @ 6:56am)
  • Kristine on On The Road – Steve from Mendocino – French Basque Country #7 (Jan 27, 2023 @ 6:54am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Favorite Dogs & Cats
Classified Documents: A Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Front-pager Twitter

John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
ActualCitizensUnited

Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice   

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!