• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Republicans are the party of chaos and catastrophe.

There are no moderate republicans – only extremists and cowards.

Accountability, motherfuckers.

Live so that if you miss a day of work people aren’t hoping you’re dead.

Jesus, Mary, & Joseph how is that election even close?

Not all heroes wear capes.

If you are in line to indict donald trump, stay in line.

Just because you believe it, that doesn’t make it true.

Don’t expect peaches from an apple tree.

Too often we confuse noise with substance. too often we confuse setbacks with defeat.

It’s easy to sit in safety and prescribe what other people should be doing.

Red lights blinking on democracy’s dashboard

I see no possible difficulties whatsoever with this fool-proof plan.

Accused of treason; bitches about the ratings. I am in awe.

with the Kraken taking a plea, the Cheese stands alone.

Fani Willis claps back at Trump chihuahua, Jim Jordan.

T R E 4 5 O N

Everyone is in a bubble, but some bubbles model reality far better than others!

It may be funny to you motherfucker, but it’s not funny to me.

Well, whatever it is, it’s better than being a Republican.

It’s always darkest before the other shoe drops.

If you still can’t see these things even now, maybe politics isn’t your forte and you should stop writing about it.

Pessimism assures that nothing of any importance will change.

Another missed opportunity for Jamie Dimon to just shut the fuck up.

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Choose 2: Healthcare costs and choices

Choose 2: Healthcare costs and choices

by David Anderson|  December 10, 20156:37 am| 4 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance, All we want is life beyond the thunderdome, Democratic Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

There are three competing choices in the American healthcare system.

  • Reasonable costs
  • Unlimited choices
  • Quality care

At best this is a one plus one of two choice scenario.  You can have reasonable costs and quality care by restricting choices, you can have quality care and unlimited choices.  It is very hard to have reasonable costs and unlimited choices.  In unlucky or isolated areas, the actual choice set may be restricted to unlimited choices that are severely constrained because there is no other choice within a 3 hour drive at high costs and low quality.

Insurers try to break this straitjacket.  One way is to use tiered networks.  Another method is to use carve out contracting.

A tiered network splits the baby.  Instead of categorizing providers as either in-network or out of network, providers are grouped into three or more buckets.  The first bucket has the lowest deductible and best cost-sharing.  These are preferred providers.  They offer either the lowest contract price to the insurer or the best value (quality and price) to the insurer.  Good tiered networks are valued based, bad tiered networks are pricing based.  A second tier of providers will often get paid standard commercial rates.  They are still in network, but the deductible and cost-sharing might be twice as much as the preferred band.  And then the rest of the providers in the country are out of network and treated no differently in a tiered network than a standard.

The preferred tier can be very narrow but the standard in-network tier gives a cushion to people who need unusual treatment with reasonable cost certainty.  From the point of view of a sick individual, tiered networks are usually better than a super narrow network.

The other approach is to use carve-out contracting.  Carve-out contracting is usually used for hospitals.  An insurer will sign a contract with a hospital for a limited set of services to be in-network.  Usually these services will be high end services like transplants, burn units, blood clotting disorder clinics or other very high cost services used by very few people.  The rest of the services offered at that hospital like hip replacements, stress tests and maternity/delivery services which are common and widely available are considered out of network.

New Jersey  has a new set of bills that would restrict these attempts by insurers to deliver good care at reasonable costs:

If they pass as written, they would place a moratorium on the implementation of the OMNIA plan as well as other tiered networks introduced during the 2015 calendar year until Jan. 1, 2017. According to the proposed bill, anyone who already has signed up for these tiered plans would be allowed a special 30-day open enrollment period to switch health plans….

The four bills would freeze tiered network offerings, eliminate carve-out contracting, and require state owned facilities to be included in the top tier.  Those are the policy proposals I think are bad.  The other proposals for disclosure on how networks are built, and the actuarial models behind network construction are guaranteed to cure insomnia.  Beyond that, I have no problem with that.  What will happen is a lot of documentation that shows the preferred tiers are built on a combination of cost and quality concerns with some strategic intention if the payer is also an integrated healthcare provider system.

It is a policy proposal that is prioritizing more choice over less cost.  That is a reasonable personal choice to make, but if we are operating in an environment where we as a society are trying to get more people to sign up for insurance, cost has to come into play as a core consideration.  Transparent and fair tiered networks and carved-out contracts are a worthy goal and a viable mechanism to deliver high quality care at reasonable costs with wider choice spaces than restricting the low cost products to only narrow networks with hard gatekeepers.

 

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Thursday Morning Open Thread: Credit Where Due
Next Post: FTC and healthcare cost control »

Reader Interactions

4Comments

  1. 1.

    Ellen

    December 10, 2015 at 7:54 am

    There seems to be quite a battle going on between health care providers and insurers in New Jersey:

    http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2015/11/nj_lawmakers_release_latest_attempt_at_controlling.html

  2. 2.

    Richard Mayhew

    December 10, 2015 at 8:00 am

    @Ellen: Yep, New Jersey is looking ugly right now. I think the main bill under discussion (surprise charges for unknown out of network providers at in network hospitals) is a reasonable attempt to find a way to bring a little bit of price transparency to a process that is currently designed to screw patients. I am not thrilled with the inclusion of a provider review board as that set-up is like the peer review board of a CEO pay committee — of course the CEO compensation is reasonable at 10% above current market rates as that CEO will backscratch later.

  3. 3.

    mattH

    December 10, 2015 at 10:31 am

    Well, regulatory capture is easier at the state level. Shouldn’t be too surprising I guess.

  4. 4.

    Grung_e_Gene

    December 10, 2015 at 10:51 am

    Ha, that’s what you think! Conservatives routinely choose none of the above for the Poors and darker hued peoples unjustly getting free stuff from the Government!

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Soprano2 on Wednesday Morning Open Thread: The GOP Insists There Will Be Blood Impeachment (Apr 17, 2024 @ 12:26pm)
  • RaflW on Arizona In The Crosshairs (Apr 17, 2024 @ 12:24pm)
  • TBone on Wednesday Morning Open Thread: The GOP Insists There Will Be Blood Impeachment (Apr 17, 2024 @ 12:23pm)
  • StringOnAStick on Cold Grey Pre-Dawn Open Thread: Fading Neom Dreams (Apr 17, 2024 @ 12:23pm)
  • RaflW on Arizona In The Crosshairs (Apr 17, 2024 @ 12:21pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning
Proposed BJ meetups list from frosty

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Political Action 2024

Postcard Writing Information

Balloon Juice for Four Directions AZ

Donate

Balloon Juice for Four Directions NV

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!