Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Come on, man.

He really is that stupid.

Jesus, Mary, & Joseph how is that election even close?

Proof that we need a blogger ethics panel.

The revolution will be supervised.

But frankly mr. cole, I’ll be happier when you get back to telling us to go fuck ourselves.

No offense, but this thread hasn’t been about you for quite a while.

Sitting here in limbo waiting for the dice to roll

Too often we confuse noise with substance. too often we confuse setbacks with defeat.

White supremacy is terrorism.

The truth is, these are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand.

You don’t get to peddle hatred on saturday and offer condolences on sunday.

I’m pretty sure there’s only one Jack Smith.

Meanwhile over at truth Social, the former president is busy confessing to crimes.

We still have time to mess this up!

I know this must be bad for Joe Biden, I just don’t know how.

Red lights blinking on democracy’s dashboard

When I decide to be condescending, you won’t have to dream up a fantasy about it.

Some judge needs to shut this circus down soon.

… pundit janitors mopping up after the GOP

Insiders who complain to politico: please report to the white house office of shut the fuck up.

Authoritarian republicans are opposed to freedom for the rest of us.

I really should read my own blog.

Balloon Juice has never been a refuge for the linguistically delicate.

You are here: Home / Politics / Activist Judges! / Trump’s Supreme Court

Trump’s Supreme Court

by | 70 Comments

This post is in: ,

William_Hogarth_004

Here’s the list of potential Trump nominees,:

Donald Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee for president, has released a list of 11 potential Supreme Court justices he plans to vet to fill the seat of late Justice Antonin Scalia if he’s elected to the White House.

Trump’s picks include Steven Colloton of Iowa, Allison Eid of Colorado and Raymond Gruender of Missouri.

Also on the list are: Thomas Hardiman of Pennsylvania, Raymond Kethledge of Michigan, Joan Larsen of Michigan, Thomas Lee of Utah, William Pryor of Alabama, David Stras of Minnesota, Diane Sykes of Wisconsin and Don Willett of Texas. Trump had previously named Pryor and Sykes as examples of kind of justices he would choose.

Reading through the TPM comments on the post there on this subject, it seems like we’ve got some cherce* ones here.

Any of our legal types care to chime in?

*Cherce.

Image:  William Hogarth, The Court,  c. 1758.   I know that I’ve used this before.  But it’s just perfect whenever the topic of GOP jurisprudencerecklessness comes up.

Reader Interactions

70Comments

  2. 2.

    ? Martin

    Which website did he crib that list from? Know that, and you’ll know what the play is.

  6. 6.

    Mike J

    Here’s a tweet from somebody on the list:

    Justice Don Willett Verified account @JusticeWillett
    Donald Trump haiku—

    Who would the Donald
    Name to #SCOTUS? The mind reels.
    *weeps—can’t finish tweet*

  9. 9.

    LAO

    @Mike J:
    @Nina:

    I used to follow Willett on Twitter — his admiration for Cruz made me unfollow. But for a Conservative Texas appellate judge — he was relatively amusing. All things considering.

  11. 11.

    LAO

    @burnspbesq:

    Far worse than anyone could ever have imagined.

    Really? You thought the list of Uber Conservative Judges provided by Heritage Foundation was going to be better than this? A failure of imagination, I say.

  12. 12.

    Ryan

    @rikyrah: This is why the Right is circling the wagons, they staff the White House with as many of their people as they can and limit Trump-induced damage.

  13. 13.

    benw

    Trump’s original list, with annotations:

    Egon Spengler – “love him, seems like a really bright guy, just a huge brain!”
    Scooby-Doo – “great dog, just a great dog, he and his gang always solve the mystery, how do they do it?”
    Tonald Drump – “just a huge, huge, classy guy, love him!”
    George Zimmerman – “don’t know much about him, but he’s been huge in the news lately, huge!”
    Ivenka Trump – “just get a load of her! what. a. lady.”
    Joffrey Lannister – “what a kid, just amazing, reminds me of myself at that age, so classy!”

  16. 16.

    Joyce H

    From back in March –

    Asked about what kind of nominees he would appoint to the Supreme Court, Trump said he’d choose “people that would look very seriously” at Hillary Clinton’s “email disaster.”

    In other words, this toxic clown has no notion in the world what the Supreme Court actually does.

  17. 17.

    Amir Khalid

    I’m surprised that Trump didn’t put Statler and Waldorf on his Supreme Court shortlist.

  18. 18.

    sharl

    @Chris:

    John Yoo’s not on the list?

    Dammit Chris, you done spoiled my moment of darkly humorous musing…

  22. 22.

    Mnemosyne

    I would say I’m surprised Judge Judy isn’t on the list, but I have heard she’s quite liberal in real life and treats her employees well, so she’s going nowhere with Trump.

    ETA: @BettyCracker — Ha!

  24. 24.

    I'mNotSureWhoIWantToBeYet

    Um, isn’t it standard practice for a candidate not to say who they would appoint? Even if this is a Heritage list, why on Earth would he read cite the names?

    Oh, here’s the NYTimes take:

    Donald J. Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, released a list of potential Supreme Court nominees on Wednesday as part of an effort to quell concerns that he would not select conservative jurists.

    The unusual move comes as Mr. Trump is looking to unify the Republican Party behind him and win over critics who remain skeptical about the seriousness of his candidacy. While some Republicans who oppose Mr. Trump have considered supporting Hillary Clinton or sitting out the election, he has regularly reminded them that the future of the Supreme Court is at stake.

    Oh, it’s all an effort to shore-up support for McConnell and the rest of the troglodytes who are holding up Garland’s vote. And to try to distract people from the rest of the Teabagger nonsense, probably.

    With any luck, this will be shot down as a transparent ploy.

    Cheers,
    Scott.

  26. 26.

    germy

    @Mnemosyne: I’ve heard the opposite about her. She goes on fox and complains about big government and lazy moochers.

    I tuned in once and she was berating a young lady who was collecting disability after surviving a brain tumor. “So you don’t have a job?? What a country!”

  29. 29.

    Amir Khalid

    @JCJ:
    Damn. Liverpool have given their lead away. Always, always, the defence falls asleep at the wrong moment.

  30. 30.

    Fcb

    Oh, please. He may have had his pixies cobble this list together while he slept, but you know the only name he’s thinkin’ is Judge Judy.

  31. 31.

    Splitting Image

    In the meantime, here is a reminder that a Clinton victory will ensure that Merrick Garland, or someone similar, will be seated on the Court, giving Ruth Bader Ginsburg a majority to work with and ensuring that as senior associate justice she, rather than John Roberts, will be deciding who writes the opinions on all of those 5-4 party line decisions that will (still) be coming down the pipe.

    (Well, technically Kennedy will still outrank her, but the others won’t need to water down a liberal decision to make sure he signs on to it.)

    People often complain that they are always being forced to vote against something and they never have anything to vote for. I say there is plenty to vote for this time out.

  36. 36.

    Bob In Portland

    This is terrible. I hope the Democrats nominate someone who isn’t hated by half the country!!!!

  39. 39.

    dedc79

    Following up on Cole’s NFL analogy below, I think Trump has adopted the NFL’ s PR model. The NFL has become America’s Sport in part by dominating the sports news cycle 365 days a year, and they’ve done that by doing something “newsworthy” each and every day. Granted it hasn’t always been something favorable, but it doesn’t matter.

    I mean, they’ve managed to milk a month’s worth of attention out of the NFL Draft (which is about as useless to watch as Wolf Blitzer reporting on KY primary results) even though it falls right in the middle of the first month of baseball season, the NHL playoffs, and the NBA playoffs.

    Trump similarly sets out to do something news worthy every day of the year. Today it was announcing fantasy Supreme Court picks. Tomorrow it will be something else.

  40. 40.

    Joyce H

    @dedc79:

    Trump similarly sets out to do something news worthy every day of the year.

    I saw a news story somewhere today that said that plans were in the works (from the Trump campaign, of course) to have Trump speak every night of the GOP Convention. Isn’t that special?

  41. 41.

    Amir Khalid

    Liverpool 1-3 Sevilla. That’s it. No Champions League football next season.
    Woe is me!

  43. 43.

    Origuy

    It’s lunchtime here so I went out to watch the game. On the advice of humboltblue I decided to root for Liverpool. That was clearly a mistake but I don’t know if it was mine or his. The game was tied when I left work.

  44. 44.

    chopper

    @Joyce H:

    the people who predicted the convention would be a week-long trump infomercial were absolutely spot-on.

  45. 45.

    Mary G

    Hopefully Hillary’s team can put together a selection of these people’s most wingnuttiest statements and hang them around Trump’s neck.

  46. 46.

    dedc79

    @Amir Khalid: I only cared to the extent i’d been told it impacts the pot that my spurs will be in for next year’s Champions League. Apparently it would’ve been better for Spurs if Liverpool had won. So, thanks for nothing.

  49. 49.

    Poopyman

    And in other judicial news (sorta):

    George Zimmerman appears to have sold the gun he used to kill Trayvon Martin four years ago, bringing an end to the latest controversy to swirl around the notorious former neighbourhood watch leader.

    Zimmerman, who shot and killed the unarmed black teenager during an altercation at his Florida housing estate in February 2012, looks set to collect $138,900 for the Kel-Tec PF-9 9mm handgun after bidding closed midday on the website unitedgungroup.com.

  51. 51.

    eric

    @JPL: there will be time to unite after Hitlery is done stealing the nominations from the real democrat in the primary!

    wait for it…………………………………………………………………………………..

  52. 52.

    NonyNony

    @Poopyman: He found some sucker willing to pay $138K for a used gun that Google tells me you can purchase new for less than $300?

    This is why the right wing will never disappear – there are too many idiots just begging to have their money taken away from them. (Of course in this case the guy is named “John Smith” so who knows – it may be a fake account created to fuck with Zimmerman).

  54. 54.

    starscream

    Trump is going to win this thing, isn’t he? The media will spend the next six months telling everyone he’s a serious human being, and this stupid country will fall for it all over again.

  55. 55.

    Immanentize

    @I’mNotSureWhoIWantToBeYet: That is so weird, Scott, because none of these folks are quality, in the Lila sense. They are basically promoting political hack judges. And two woman judges (for diversity sake and one is the wife of another candidate) who are really quite horrible. I have not looked closely at all of them, but I will tomorrow.

  56. 56.

    sharl

    {sound of clattering tickertape} ***UPDATE***UPDATE***UPDATE*** {…fade out sound…}

    @Chris:

    John Yoo’s not on the list?

    Welp, while Yoo isn’t on the list {insert ironical sadface}, the man has weighed in. Via Popehat on twitter:

    Trump judges likely to approve crushing of the testicles of our enemies’ children

    Yoo at NRO:

    Everyone on the list is an outstanding legal conservative. All are young, smart, and committed. They would excel in any comparison with anyone whom Hillary Clinton would appoint to the Supreme Court. Several of the possibilities, such as Tom Lee of Utah, Allison Eid of Colorado, and David Stras of Minnesota, are former law clerks of Justice Clarence Thomas, while others, such as Steve Colloton of Iowa and Joan Larsen of Michigan, clerked for Justice Antonin Scalia. They are joined by other well-known judicial conservatives, such as Diane Sykes, Don Willet, Ray Kethledge, and Bill Pryor.

    These names are a Federalist Society all-star list of conservative jurisprudence. In the interest of full disclosure, I will note that I count several of them as colleagues and friends. It is a good sign that, on one of a president’s most important decisions, Trump clearly turned to the Federalist Society and the Heritage Foundation for advice.

    You just keep being you, Yoo.

  59. 59.

    benw

    @starscream: DON’T PANIC

    I don’t doubt they’ll try. The US has been suckered before, but Reagan and W could at least walk the “serious” walk when the media held the bar low and didn’t ask any hard questions. Trump can’t even do that. I have (qualified) faith in (a sizable enough block of) the American voters that Trump will lose (badly).

  60. 60.

    Immanentize

    @LAO: That guy is horrible — one of the Bush appointees not vetted — a real death penalty racist when AG in Alabama. I hope he is not on your panel!

  64. 64.

    shortstop

    OMG, I saw “cherce” and immediately thought of Pat and Mike. A longtime household favorite here (both the phrase and the movie).

  65. 65.

    pat

    It’s funny, they rave about Obama destroying this country, and yet that is exactly what they propose to do. From “drown it in the bathtub” to “repeal obamacare,” it’s all about turning the country back, out of the 21st century.

    It’s always projection.

  66. 66.

    bushwortspresidentever

    This list makes Scalia look like a moderate. But I’m sure a Sanders supporter can assure me that Trump will be better than Hillary.

  68. 68.

    D58826

    From 1995 to 1996 Steven Colloton was an associate independent counsel in the Office of Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr.

    Well he sounds like a real winner.

  69. 69.

    J R in WV

    @D58826:

    ‘From 1995 to 1996 ”

    From 12-01-95 to 01-31-96 is little different from 01-02-95 to 12-29-96 … only the difference between 2 months and two years.

  70. 70.

    momus

    A fine collection of fifth rate legal minds. Sykes, the Walker toadie is especially egregious.

Comments are closed.