• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Consistently wrong since 2002

Shallow, uninformed, and lacking identity

No one could have predicted…

It’s a doggy dog world.

… gradually, and then suddenly.

The republican caucus is already covering themselves with something, and it’s not glory.

When we show up, we win.

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires

A snarling mass of vitriolic jackals

Every one of the “Roberts Six” lied to get on the court.

“Everybody’s entitled to be an idiot.”

Red lights blinking on democracy’s dashboard

He imagines himself as The Big Bad, Who Is Universally Feared… instead of The Big Jagoff, Who Is Universally Mocked.

White supremacy is terrorism.

“Can i answer the question? No you can not!”

Some judge needs to shut this circus down soon.

Jesus, Mary, & Joseph how is that election even close?

RIP Zandar. We are still here fighting the stupid, now in your honor.

Second rate reporter says what?

Today’s GOP: why go just far enough when too far is right there?

We’ll be taking my thoughts and prayers to the ballot box.

Quote tweet friends, screenshot enemies.

I was confident that someone would point it out and thought why not me.

Insiders who complain to politico: please report to the white house office of shut the fuck up.

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Washington State’s public option and premium spreads

Washington State’s public option and premium spreads

by David Anderson|  April 15, 20197:50 am| 7 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance

FacebookTweetEmail

Washington State is on the verge of passing a public option for their individual market. The bill that will soon go to the governor’s desk is here. I want to highlight one section that illustrates a problem for standardized plans.

(1) The exchange, in consultation with the commissioner, the
11 authority, an independent actuary, and other stakeholders, must
12 establish up to three standardized health plans for each of the
bronze, silver, and gold levels.
14 (a) The standardized health plans must be designed to reduce
15 deductibles, make more services available before the deductible,
16 provide predictable cost sharing, maximize subsidies, limit adverse
17 premium impacts, reduce barriers to maintaining and improving health,
18 and encourage choice based on value, while limiting increases in
health plan premium rates.

(iii) The actuarial value of nonstandardized silver health plans
27 offered on the exchange may not be less than the actuarial value of
28 the standardized silver health plan with the lowest actuarial value.

These two sections are in tension for any non-monopoly county.

I’ve been banging the drum on Silver Gapping which is the spread between the cheapest Silver plan and the benchmark Silver plan for years now. The benchmark plan is the second least expensive silver plan in a buying region.

Premiums for a given plan are a function of network costs, actuarial value, plan type and incentive effects of the benefit design. Standardized benefit designs eliminate actuarial value and incentive effect differences between competing insurers. Instead they will compete on who can get better pricing from providers and how restrictive their plan designs are (PPO vs. HMO basically.)

If there are two or more insurers offering a standardized silver plan in a region, the standardized plan design will compress the premium spread as Insurer #2 will offer a plan that is only slightly more expensive than the cheapest Silver plan. Price sensitive buyers who are subsidy eligible will be seeing fairly sparse discounts. This means the risk pool is smaller and sicker than it otherwise would be.

Standardizing plans reduces the complexity of the choice structure. That is valuable. However, it also makes net of subsidy premiums higher for quite a few people. This is a tension that states have to grapple with.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: «On the Road and In Your Backyard 18 On the Road and In Your Backyard
Next Post: Speaker Pelosi on 60 Minutes »

Reader Interactions

7Comments

  1. 1.

    p.a.

    April 15, 2019 at 8:06 am

    I thought Cali looked at a public option and decided it could not afford one (monetarily or politically or both). If Cali’s resources are not enough, how is Washington’s. Or am I mis-remembering what California considered.

  2. 2.

    rikyrah

    April 15, 2019 at 9:50 am

    @p.a.:

    I thought it was single payer that California couldn’t get the numbers to work.

  3. 3.

    rikyrah

    April 15, 2019 at 9:56 am

    Will keep an eye on how this develops in Washington state.

  4. 4.

    p.a.

    April 15, 2019 at 10:12 am

    @rikyrah:
    https://pnhp.org/news/reducing-californias-single-payer-legislation-to-a-public-option/

    You’re right. Pub opt still in study phase aft single p numbers wouldn’t work.

  5. 5.

    Robert Camner

    April 15, 2019 at 11:22 am

    While it’s nice to hear your analysis of the impact on subsidized buyers, I’d be even more interested in your analysis of whether a public option that is designed to compete with private insurance plans in a standardized manner is (or is not) good public policy, which I would define as “the greatest good for the greatest number + providing an appropriate safety net for the most vulnerable”

  6. 6.

    David Anderson

    April 15, 2019 at 11:40 am

    @Robert Camner: the short answer is that is depends on how the current market is locally structured and how the public option is structured.

    On net, it is probably a no worse off situation for non-subsidized buyers, and it gets messy for subsidized buyers.

  7. 7.

    Dan B

    April 15, 2019 at 2:15 pm

    This legislation seems to have no coverage in the local papers. The Seattle Times skews heavily to Elizabeth Warren’s former views: Don’t waste money on reprobates and the undeserving. It’s a surprise to read about it here first. Thanks! A more robust discussion seems like it would be valuable.
    One of my local rep’s is good. If you have an elevator version to forward to his staff that would be handy, along with a link to the technical fixes.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

2024 Pet Calendars Spreadsheets

2024 Pet Calendar A (Nyms A-K)
2024 Pet Calendar A (Nyms L-Z)
2024 Pet Calendar B (Nyms A-K)
2024 Pet Calendar B (Nyms L-Z)

Recent Comments

  • NotMax on Sunday Morning Open Thread: Lazy Sunday Morning (Dec 3, 2023 @ 9:46am)
  • O. Felix Culpa on Sunday Morning Open Thread: Lazy Sunday Morning (Dec 3, 2023 @ 9:46am)
  • WaterGirl on Sunday Morning Garden Chat: WaterGirl’s Garden (Dec 3, 2023 @ 9:45am)
  • martha on Sunday Morning Open Thread: Lazy Sunday Morning (Dec 3, 2023 @ 9:44am)
  • WaterGirl on Sunday Morning Garden Chat: WaterGirl’s Garden (Dec 3, 2023 @ 9:43am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions: Montana

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
What Has Biden Done for You Lately?

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Cole & Friends Learn Español

Introductory Post
Cole & Friends Learn Español

Four Directions Montana

Donate

Walter’s Fund (Athenspets)

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!