• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Nothing worth doing is easy.

Republicans don’t want a speaker to lead them; they want a hostage.

If you’re gonna whine, it’s time to resign!

“But what about the lurkers?”

We can show the world that autocracy can be defeated.

They think we are photo bombing their nice little lives.

JFC, are there no editors left at that goddamn rag?

Every decision we make has lots of baggage with it, known or unknown.

When we show up, we win.

We’re watching the self-immolation of the leading world power on a level unprecedented in human history.

Someone should tell Republicans that violence is the last refuge of the incompetent, or possibly the first.

Michigan is a great lesson for Dems everywhere: when you have power…use it!

“Facilitate” is an active verb, not a weasel word.

If you tweet it in all caps, that makes it true!

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

I desperately hope that, yet again, i am wrong.

There are consequences to being an arrogant, sullen prick.

It’s easy to sit in safety and prescribe what other people should be doing.

The poor and middle-class pay taxes, the rich pay accountants, the wealthy pay politicians.

A sufficient plurality of insane, greedy people can tank any democratic system ever devised, apparently.

Dumb motherfuckers cannot understand a consequence that most 4 year olds have fully sorted out.

“Until such time as the world ends, we will act as though it intends to spin on.”

Stop using mental illness to avoid talking about armed white supremacy.

“A king is only a king if we bow down.” – Rev. William Barber

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Washington State’s public option and premium spreads

Washington State’s public option and premium spreads

by David Anderson|  April 15, 20197:50 am| 7 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance

FacebookTweetEmail

Washington State is on the verge of passing a public option for their individual market. The bill that will soon go to the governor’s desk is here. I want to highlight one section that illustrates a problem for standardized plans.

(1) The exchange, in consultation with the commissioner, the
11 authority, an independent actuary, and other stakeholders, must
12 establish up to three standardized health plans for each of the
bronze, silver, and gold levels.
14 (a) The standardized health plans must be designed to reduce
15 deductibles, make more services available before the deductible,
16 provide predictable cost sharing, maximize subsidies, limit adverse
17 premium impacts, reduce barriers to maintaining and improving health,
18 and encourage choice based on value, while limiting increases in
health plan premium rates.

(iii) The actuarial value of nonstandardized silver health plans
27 offered on the exchange may not be less than the actuarial value of
28 the standardized silver health plan with the lowest actuarial value.

These two sections are in tension for any non-monopoly county.

I’ve been banging the drum on Silver Gapping which is the spread between the cheapest Silver plan and the benchmark Silver plan for years now. The benchmark plan is the second least expensive silver plan in a buying region.

Premiums for a given plan are a function of network costs, actuarial value, plan type and incentive effects of the benefit design. Standardized benefit designs eliminate actuarial value and incentive effect differences between competing insurers. Instead they will compete on who can get better pricing from providers and how restrictive their plan designs are (PPO vs. HMO basically.)

If there are two or more insurers offering a standardized silver plan in a region, the standardized plan design will compress the premium spread as Insurer #2 will offer a plan that is only slightly more expensive than the cheapest Silver plan. Price sensitive buyers who are subsidy eligible will be seeing fairly sparse discounts. This means the risk pool is smaller and sicker than it otherwise would be.

Standardizing plans reduces the complexity of the choice structure. That is valuable. However, it also makes net of subsidy premiums higher for quite a few people. This is a tension that states have to grapple with.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: «On the Road and In Your Backyard 18 On the Road and In Your Backyard
Next Post: Speaker Pelosi on 60 Minutes »

Reader Interactions

7Comments

  1. 1.

    p.a.

    April 15, 2019 at 8:06 am

    I thought Cali looked at a public option and decided it could not afford one (monetarily or politically or both). If Cali’s resources are not enough, how is Washington’s. Or am I mis-remembering what California considered.

  2. 2.

    rikyrah

    April 15, 2019 at 9:50 am

    @p.a.:

    I thought it was single payer that California couldn’t get the numbers to work.

  3. 3.

    rikyrah

    April 15, 2019 at 9:56 am

    Will keep an eye on how this develops in Washington state.

  4. 4.

    p.a.

    April 15, 2019 at 10:12 am

    @rikyrah:
    https://pnhp.org/news/reducing-californias-single-payer-legislation-to-a-public-option/

    You’re right. Pub opt still in study phase aft single p numbers wouldn’t work.

  5. 5.

    Robert Camner

    April 15, 2019 at 11:22 am

    While it’s nice to hear your analysis of the impact on subsidized buyers, I’d be even more interested in your analysis of whether a public option that is designed to compete with private insurance plans in a standardized manner is (or is not) good public policy, which I would define as “the greatest good for the greatest number + providing an appropriate safety net for the most vulnerable”

  6. 6.

    David Anderson

    April 15, 2019 at 11:40 am

    @Robert Camner: the short answer is that is depends on how the current market is locally structured and how the public option is structured.

    On net, it is probably a no worse off situation for non-subsidized buyers, and it gets messy for subsidized buyers.

  7. 7.

    Dan B

    April 15, 2019 at 2:15 pm

    This legislation seems to have no coverage in the local papers. The Seattle Times skews heavily to Elizabeth Warren’s former views: Don’t waste money on reprobates and the undeserving. It’s a surprise to read about it here first. Thanks! A more robust discussion seems like it would be valuable.
    One of my local rep’s is good. If you have an elevator version to forward to his staff that would be handy, along with a link to the technical fixes.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - lashonharangue - Along the Zambezi River [2 of 2] 8
Image by lashonharangue (7/8/25)

World Central Kitchen

Donate

Recent Comments

  • Glory b on Wisconsin Is A Reminder of Why We Should Never Give up (Jul 8, 2025 @ 11:25pm)
  • NotMax on Wisconsin Is A Reminder of Why We Should Never Give up (Jul 8, 2025 @ 11:18pm)
  • Enhanced Voting Techniques on Sportsball Open Thread: Suprise! FIFA Says It Can Work With Don TACO (Jul 8, 2025 @ 11:14pm)
  • Kristine on Wisconsin Is A Reminder of Why We Should Never Give up (Jul 8, 2025 @ 11:10pm)
  • Mousebumples on Wisconsin Is A Reminder of Why We Should Never Give up (Jul 8, 2025 @ 11:06pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
No Kings Protests June 14 2025

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Feeling Defeated?  If We Give Up, It's Game Over

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!