• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Everybody saw this coming.

Live so that if you miss a day of work people aren’t hoping you’re dead.

The willow is too close to the house.

Imperialist aggressors must be defeated, or the whole world loses.

No one could have predicted…

Polls are now a reliable indicator of what corporate Republicans want us to think.

If you are still in the gop, you are either an extremist yourself, or in bed with those who are.

These days, even the boring Republicans are nuts.

The low info voters probably won’t even notice or remember by their next lap around the goldfish bowl.

I swear, each month of 2025 will have its own history degree.

Just because you believe it, that does not make it true.

They are not red states to be hated; they are voter suppression states to be fixed.

Red lights blinking on democracy’s dashboard

They fucked up the fucking up of the fuckup!

If ‘weird’ was the finish line, they ran through the tape and kept running.

The cruelty is the point; the law be damned.

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

Is it negotiation when the other party actually wants to shoot the hostage?

No offense, but this thread hasn’t been about you for quite a while.

Optimism opens the door to great things.

Anyone who bans teaching American history has no right to shape America’s future.

When do we start airlifting the women and children out of Texas?

Text STOP to opt out of updates on war plans.

They punch you in the face and then start crying because their fist hurts.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / The Medicaid to ACA transition is shaky

The Medicaid to ACA transition is shaky

by David Anderson|  September 7, 202312:17 pm| 3 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance

FacebookTweetEmail

In 2020, Congress passed the Families First Coronavirus Responce Act (FFCRA).  FFCRA did a lot of things.  One of the big things it did was support state budgets and health coverage by increasing the Federal Matching Assistance Percentage (FMAP).  FMAP is the percentage of allowed program costs that the federal government pays.  It is determined by a state’s income.  Typically it ranges from a floor of 50% to just under 80%.  FFCRA did two big Medicaid things.  First it increased the FMAP across the board by 6.2% percentage points.  Secondly, it required states that accepted this bump payment to not disenroll folks.  This continuous coverage requirement ended in the last budget agreement.  States have started to redetermine enrollees this spring.

Early projections expected ~15 million people to lose Medicaid coverage.  Many folks would receive coverage elsewhere because their lives changed.  However a decent percentage of this 15 million people who lost Medicaid would need to find new coverage.  Many would be eligible for the ACA.

The problem is that historically the Medicaid to ACA interface is not too good.  Earlier this year, in JAMA Network Open Chris Frenier and Adrianna McIntyre looked at where pre-pandemic Minnesota Medicaid enrollees found coverage in the year after they lost Medicaid coverage:

Six months after leaving Medicaid, 17.6% of children had enrolled in commercial group coverage, and 2.2% of children had enrolled in individual coverage. Among children, 48.7% did not have identifiable MN APCD coverage at 6 months, decreasing to 29.8% after 12 months, largely because of Medicaid reenrollment; 51.2% of children who left the program were reenrolled 1 year later.

Among adults, 50.1% did not have identifiable coverage 6 months after Medicaid exit, decreasing to 39.1% at 12 months. The share of adults covered by commercial coverage after 12 months was 13.6% for group plans and 5.9% for individual plans. The share who had returned to Medicaid at 12 months was 32.8%.

Just over 2% of kids and just under 6% of adults who lost Medicaid coverage in Minnesota enrolled in the Minnesota exchange in the year after coverage loss.

Maybe this data is old. Maybe there was low awareness in 2017 and the Minnesota state based marketplace imposed idiosyncratic administrative burdens that it had not thought about? Maybe things changed?

Well….

Amy Lotven at Inside Healthcare reports on new CMS data from the Medicaid unwinding

 

New CMS data , quietly released in late August, show about 178,000 consumers chose a qualified health plan (QHP) through state or federal exchanges after losing Medicaid and CHIP coverage in the first two months of the Medicaid unwinding

As more adults are redetermined out of Medicaid, states should be aggressively linking these newly uninsured or likely to be uninsured folks to the ACA.  There, they are likely to face higher premiums and more cost-sharing.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Biden’s Belief in a ‘Culture of Democracy’
Next Post: Hmm DOJ and Jack Smith (LIVE) Now 2»

Reader Interactions

3Comments

  1. 1.

    Lobo

    September 7, 2023 at 1:52 pm

    Would the next step be an administrative bridge to the ACA from Medicaid to ease the loss of coverage friction?

  2. 2.

    David Anderson

    September 7, 2023 at 3:40 pm

    @Lobo: Yep, but there are big implementation challenges starting with premium tax credits are effectively a loan which is cancellable/forgiveable if incomes hit certain criteria for the next tax filing.  Things gets legally squicky to obligate people to a loan that they might not have consented to.

  3. 3.

    Martin

    September 7, 2023 at 4:01 pm

    @Lobo: California is doing this now. I can’t speak to its effectiveness, but I have seen a bit how it works.

    When I retired we got a policy on the exchange – basically the coverage we had from my employer, but in CA the application process for ACA is this same as for Medicaid (MediCal). There’s a whole additional thing you need to do for MediCal, which we didn’t want to do knowing we wouldn’t be qualified because of our net worth, and that turned out to be a difficult thing to not do. CA *really* wants everyone who touches either MediCal or ACA to be applied to both, and they’ve been working around the edges to make sure that if you are eligible for one, you would be eligible for the other apart from income/assets. So extending coverage for this group or that group and tapping into state funds where the feds forbid coverage and all that. The idea seems to be that when you contact the state during open enrollment or some qualifying life event, the state can determine which you should be on and just switch you because you’ve already done the paperwork for both, so you should automatically fall up onto the exchange or fall down on to MediCal. I don’t know if that actually *works* but they are activity trying to make it work.

    I’m not sure what it looks like if you are Medicare/Medicaid dual eligible – I can imagine that’s a whole other set of policy challenges, but we aren’t old enough to have run into that.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - Albatrossity - Flyover Country Spring 2
Image by Albatrossity (5/18/25)

Recent Comments

  • Kayla Rudbek on Late Night Open Thread: Flag Humper’s Day D.C. Parade (May 19, 2025 @ 12:54am)
  • Jackie on Late Night Open Thread: Flag Humper’s Day D.C. Parade (May 19, 2025 @ 12:53am)
  • Kayla Rudbek on Sunday Diversion: ‘A Dumb New Way To Think About The Dismantling Of The Federal Government’ (May 19, 2025 @ 12:51am)
  • Kayla Rudbek on Sunday Diversion: ‘A Dumb New Way To Think About The Dismantling Of The Federal Government’ (May 19, 2025 @ 12:47am)
  • Sister Inspired Revolver of Freedom on War for Ukraine Day 1,179: Putin Keeps Probing for Mush (May 19, 2025 @ 12:46am)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!