Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Conservatism: there are people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

I conferred with the team and they all agree – still not tired of winning!

JFC, are there no editors left at that goddamn rag?

When we show up, we win.

Putin must be throwing ketchup at the walls.

It may be funny to you motherfucker, but it’s not funny to me.

This fight is for everything.

Sadly, there is no cure for stupid.

The revolution will be supervised.

Wake up. Grow up. Get in the fight.

Michigan is a great lesson for Dems everywhere: when you have power…use it!

Yeah, with this crowd one never knows.

When you’re in more danger from the IDF than from Russian shelling, that’s really bad.

Quote tweet friends, screenshot enemies.

Republicans are the party of chaos and catastrophe.

Since when do we limit our critiques to things we could do better ourselves?

There is one struggling party in US right now, and it’s not the Democrats.

Baby steps, because the Republican Party is full of angry babies.

In after Baud. Damn.

Why is it so hard for them to condemn hate?

No one could have predicted…

Sitting here in limbo waiting for the dice to roll

The line between political reporting and fan fiction continues to blur.

If you tweet it in all caps, that makes it true!

You are here: Home / Open Threads / Angel Match #3 for our 2 Virginia Delegates!

Angel Match #3 for our 2 Virginia Delegates!

by | 47 Comments

This post is in: 

We are trying to get each of these two candidates $10,000 to help in their fight to win these seats in Virginia.

Our first Balloon Juice Angel match for Virginia helped get us to $5,000!   The second one helped get us to $8,200!  Hoping this Angel Match can get us closer to $15,000.

On Wisconsin!

Patrick is our Balloon Juice Angel today – let’s see what we can get to with this one.  Big thanks to Patrick and all of our angels, and to everyone who is able to donate!

Patrick will match up to $25 per person, for a total of $500.

Let’s get this Angel Match started!  As we kick off the match, the thermometer is at $8,776.

The two Virginia candidates we are supporting are:

  •  Michael Feggans
  • Kimberly Pope Adams

Why these two in particular?

The seats they are running for are held by two rabid anti-choice women.  The two white Republicans who hold these seats replaced black delegates who had held the seats previously.  Let’s take them back! One of the incumbents ran one of the “fake clinic” that are so despicable, and the other has been involved in the fake clinic scams.

There are other pro-choice candidates for delegates, but these two really need the funds, and many of the other candidates who are in toss-up elections have plenty of cash – and if they don’t win, it won’t be because of money.

There are 4 more folks that we have our eye on, and Q3 fundraising figures should be available very soon, at which point we will reassess which candidates can most use our help.

Open thread.

Reader Interactions

47Comments

  1. 1.

    WaterGirl

    Reminder:  To count toward the match, donations have to be listed in the comments.  Or if you prefer a more private option, you can send me an email message

    You all recall, of course, that everything resets with a new angel match.  So even if you have donated to one of the other angel matches for VA, the slate is wiped clean with each new angel.

  2. 2.

    WaterGirl

    Since this is an open thread… This is interesting.

    BJ attorneys, or anyone else knowledgeable about procedure, what say you?

  5. 5.

    coin operated

    @WaterGirl: IANAL, but I thought the whole thing was farce because the House didn’t vote on it. That’s what Trump’s DOJ did to Pelosi when she impeached Trump…forgetting that Nancy SMASH knows how to get votes.

  6. 6.

    New Deal democrat

    I saw some comments in the last thread about today’s employment report. Let me make a few bullet point comments:

    – yes, celebrate. But
    – 87,000 were government jobs. Plus, all of the 119,000 upward revisions to the last 2 months was accounted for by the upward revisions in state and local government employment, largely in the education categories.
    – in other words, the kinks in post- vs. pre-pandemic seasonal adjustments haven’t been worked out.
    – so, why did Wall Street not like the news? Because it means the Fed is likely to raise interest rates again at their next meeting.

  7. 7.

    RaflW

    @WaterGirl: While I get that Dems playing this me-too game further deteriorates the norms we used to live by, I think the Biden Admin should ignore the subpoenas on the grounds that witnesses sympathetic to the MAGA caucus routinely ignored Dem subpoenas last term.

    Or, provide 1000s of meaningless emails, and then later, if it comes out that there were emails that were relevant and missed, say, oopsie, they were in a bankers box in a guest bathroom. Our bad! Sorry!

    (Yes I’m in a petty mood this morning.)

  8. 8.

    Baud

    @RaflW:

    It’s not me-too to enforce some norms of legislative procedure. Any subpoenas in these circumstances would be unprecedented.

  9. 9.

    RaflW

    @New Deal democrat: “it means the Fed is likely to raise interest rates again at their next meeting”

    But then the Wall Streeters and their debt-doom caucus can get even more worked up about how gov’t service on the debt is getting more expensive, so we should slash Social Security and Medicare, because it’s the only fiscally responsible thing to do.

    It’s the brass ring. And it gets closer when interest rates rise.

    —

    In less snarky news, the jobs data has an embedded bit of (more) good: The unemployment rate didn’t drop with the jump in hiring. Which means people are re-entering the workforce. Ignoring what the investment ghouls think, that is, I believe, an overall quite good thing!

  11. 11.

    SiubhanDuinne

    In for $25. Thank you, Patrick, for the Angel match — and to WG, as always, for making it easy.

  14. 14.

    New Deal democrat

    @RaflW: In re the unemployment rate: unemployment (the numerator) rose by 5,000, and the labor force (the denominator) rose by 90,000 (a low number). The labor force participation rate remained the same.

  15. 15.

    Another Scott

    @New Deal democrat: There’s the “buy on the rumor, sell on the news” stuff, too.

    The S&P is still up 13.5% in the last year.  Not too shabby, and yet another reason not to worry too much about the daily swings in the stock market.

    Cheers,
    Scott.

  17. 17.

    sab

    @coin operated: That’s what I thought also. Without the House voting for an impeachment inquiry the Executive branch may not respond to subpenas. Isn’t there an Office of Legal Counsel memorandum to that effect ( written under Trump but not revised under Biden) . So the new norm is to ignore those subpenas. It’s not Biden’s people flaunting rules. It’s Biden’s people following rules clarified by Trump’s people.

    Rafl@#7 and Baud@#8

    ETA Also it isn’t even a new norm. Casually starting impeachment proceedings is the new thing and hopefully will never be a norm. Pelosi was adamant about only going for impeachment for egregious behavior. Hopefully that norm will hold.

  22. 22.

    RaflW

    re: job growth “The broad increase in payrolls was led by the leisure and hospitality industry, which added 96,000 jobs. Restaurants and bars dominated, with 61,000 positions created, returning employment in the sector back to its pre-pandemic level.”

  23. 23.

    Baud

    @RaflW:

    Restaurants and bars dominated,

    I thought the Dems destroyed the restaurant industry.  Right after we burned cities to the ground.

  24. 24.

    RaflW

    @sab: Yeah, that memo is out there. It was roundly criticized at the time, but given the lack of procedural authority for this (scam) investigation/fishing expedition, ignoring subpoenas seems fine.

  29. 29.

    Maxim

    FYI, I followed the link in the post and tried to donate, but clicking on the button for the amount I wanted to donate did not take me to the subsequent page to complete the donation. I don’t know if it’s just a temporary glitch or what, but wanted to report it in case it happened to anyone else. I closed the tab and tried again with the same result.

  31. 31.

    Steeplejack

    @Maxim:

    I just gave a small amount again as a test, and it worked with PayPal. Which method were you trying to use—PayPal, ActBlue or “Pay” (credit card)?

    Also, what device and browser?

  33. 33.

    Maxim

    @Steeplejack: ActBlue, on my iPad. I’m about to try again on my laptop; I’ll let y’all know what happens.

    Hmm, didn’t work on my laptop either, which makes me suspect it’s something on the ActBlue end of things.

  34. 34.

    Another Scott

    @Maxim: It sounds like you’ve got some other software interfereing.

    Try opening the link in a “private browsing” (or your browser’s equivalent term) window?

    It works here.

    +$198.

    Thanks angel and everyone!

    Cheers,
    Scott.

  35. 35.

    Maxim

    @Another Scott: I did a private browser window and (once I’d signed into my Act Blue account) had the same problem. It’s something to do with that. I opened a new private window and used a different payment method, and that worked, and then I was able to sign into my Act Blue account afterward. Very strange.

    Anyway, in for $25.

  39. 39.

    Czar Chasm

    So, a little info about each candidate’s localities.

    Virginia Beach (Michael Feggans) – More than just an artificial beach, it’s also the largest city in Virginia, almost twice the size of 2nd place, Chesapeake (its neighbor city to the south).  Virginia Beach is struggling with several issues, most notably rapidly rising housing costs, increased racial tensions that have grown as more families have relocated from next-door neighbor Norfolk, and more rapidly rising sea levels.  The former is a result of now having nowhere else to grow but upward (there’s a 3×3 block of 20-story buildings you can see on the highway that takes you to the beach, that sticks out like a sore thumb), as all the land outside the city limits is either part of another city, some military base or another, or under a large body of water.  The area was red for a while (a mixture of the heavy military presence and the “beach culture’ that heavily skews towards rich and white), but has become more purple in the past 10 years, mainly from the migration I mentioned before, so Feggans has a good shot at winning.

    Dinwiddie (Kimberly Pope Adams) – With the exception of the Tidewater urban mass, one city, and one other county, most localities south of the James River are notorious for being poor areas.  These are the farming communities of Virginia, where tobacco’s influence has been waning for the past 75 years, along with the health of the soil:  Tobacco is very cruel to the ground from which it sprouts.  Dinwiddie is one of these counties, bordering Petersburg, the sixth poorest city in the Commonwealth, to the north.  This city has been expanding in the northern part of the county, making it more purple over the past few years.  This is probably one of the most competitive races in Virginia right now, as residents in the southern, very white part of the county are pitted against the ones in the northern, not-so-white parts (no Civil War jokes, please).

  41. 41.

    WaterGirl

    Hey, we just hit $10,000!   (fireworks emoji!)

    And we have $250 left on our angel match.  This is the last angel match I have for this, just in case anyone was holding out for the next one. :-)

  45. 45.

    WaterGirl

    @HumboldtBlue: That sounds like good news.

    But it doesn’t track with what I am seeing at your link. What am I missing?

    Virginia Early Voting Update after 2 weeks:

    2021: 166,771

    2022: 148,786

    2023: 144,667

    There is a backlog of mail that hasn’t been counted, but otherwise 2023 is still tracking slightly ahead of 2022.

    To me that looks like lower turnout in 2023.  What am I missing?

Comments are closed.