• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • Comment
  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Not rolling over. fuck you, make me.

American history and black history cannot be separated.

So very ready.

This blog will pay for itself.

T R E 4 5 O N

This isn’t Democrats spending madly. This is government catching up.

You are so fucked. Still, I wish you the best of luck.

If you cannot answer whether trump lost the 2020 election, you are unfit for office.

Following reporting rules is only for the little people, apparently.

You cannot shame the shameless.

A fool as well as an oath-breaker.

Sadly, there is no cure for stupid.

The revolution will be supervised.

One way or another, he’s a liar.

He seems like a smart guy, but JFC, what a dick!

“What are Republicans afraid of?” Everything.

That meeting sounds like a shotgun wedding between a shitshow and a clusterfuck.

Jesus watching the most hateful people claiming to be his followers

Michigan is a great lesson for Dems everywhere: when you have power…use it!

Let me eat cake. The rest of you could stand to lose some weight, frankly.

So many bastards, so little time.

Consistently wrong since 2002

If a good thing happens for a bad reason, it’s still a good thing.

Fight for a just cause, love your fellow man, live a good life.

Mobile Menu

  • 2026 Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Foreign Affairs / Monday Morning Open Thread

Monday Morning Open Thread

by Anne Laurie|  March 2, 20267:29 am| 267 Comments

This post is in: Foreign Affairs, Open Threads, Proud to Be A Democrat, Republican Stupidity, War

FacebookTweetEmail

The Fire Horse in Chinatown today helping to melt that snow! ??

[image or embed]

— Michelle Wu ?? (@wutrain.bsky.social) March 1, 2026 at 2:23 PM

Congress holds the power to declare war – not the President.
I will be joining Senators Kaine, Paul and Schumer in forcing a vote on our war powers resolution to make it clear: Congress has not authorized this use of our military.

[image or embed]

— Sen. Adam Schiff (@schiff.senate.gov) March 1, 2026 at 8:58 PM

Trump's attack on Iran was not America First. 
Trump was played by Israeli PM Netanyahu and the Saudi Crown Prince. Putting Americans at risk to advance their personal ambitions is a complete betrayal of the American people. 
www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202…

[image or embed]

— Senator Chris Van Hollen (@vanhollen.senate.gov) March 1, 2026 at 2:34 PM

for reference, 73% of americans supported the war in iraq in 2003 — two years after 9/11 and two years of the bush administration making the case for it. this will be different, iran's in much worse shape to begin with, but it's starting wildly unpopular and will only get worse with consequences

[image or embed]

— GOLIKEHELLMACHINE (@golikehellmachine.com) March 1, 2026 at 8:30 PM

News media in general is pretty friendly towards wars—especially ones launched by Republicans-so its telling that off the bat Trumps already getting skeptical to critical headlines even from outlets that are typically pretty friendly to him

[image or embed]

— Daniel Gilmore (@gilmored85.bsky.social) March 1, 2026 at 9:28 PM

After Trump launched a new war on Iran, he did not rush back to the White House or make an Oval Office address to rally the nation as other presidents have done. He stayed at Mar-a-Lago to attend a glitzy political fundraiser. www.nytimes.com/2026/02/28/u…

[image or embed]

— Peter Baker (@peterbakernyt.bsky.social) March 1, 2026 at 1:09 PM



Gift link:

… On Sunday, Mr. Trump had yet to make a public appearance. He posted a second video to social media describing the continuing attacks and again calling on the Iranian people to “take back your country.” Late in the afternoon, he began his trip back to Washington, the only event on his public schedule.

Mr. Trump’s remarks were limited to the two videos and conversations with individual reporters and outlets, including The New York Times. His decision not to give a formal address came after he made little effort before the attack to lay out the case for a military assault against Iran.

His lack of public engagement, after launching a military attack that could spur a broader conflict and has already cost the lives of at least three U.S. service members and dozens of people in Iran, Israel and other countries in the region, was a striking departure from how other presidents have handled the gravity of war….

Mr. Trump’s allies have argued that his communication strategy has adapted to the changing media landscape, where many Americans get their news and updates from social media. Steven Cheung, the White House communications director, celebrated Mr. Trump on social media on Saturday night as “focused,” invoking a term used by the MAGA base for critics of the president’s approach.

“NO PANICANS!” Mr. Cheung said in a statement on X. “TRUST IN TRUMP!”…

On Saturday, the president did not make himself available to the press pool, a group of reporters who are assigned to follow his movements and record his remarks. Those reporters last saw him Friday night, when he waved as he descended from Air Force One after landing in Florida.

Instead, he made his case on Saturday with an eight-minute video posted on social media, which was edited and not broadcast live.

“Our objective is to defend the American people by eliminating imminent threats from the Iranian regime, a vicious group of very hard, terrible people,” Mr. Trump said, without specifying those threats. Key elements of what he and his advisers did assert in recent weeks about why Iran was a threat were false or unproven…

The president did not let the bombing of Iran upend his schedule, including his plans to attend a fund-raising dinner to support MAGA Inc., a pro-Trump super PAC.

Ms. Leavitt said Saturday that Mr. Trump had no intention of breaking that commitment. The fund-raiser, she said, was “more important than ever.”

Optics.
@thedailybeast.bsky.social
www.thedailybeast.com/trump-hosts-…

[image or embed]

— Carl Quintanilla (@carlquintanilla.bsky.social) March 1, 2026 at 1:40 PM

Reporter: What’s your message to the families of the fallen?
Trump:
(via @acyn.bsky.social)

[image or embed]

— Carl Quintanilla (@carlquintanilla.bsky.social) March 1, 2026 at 7:52 PM

Oops.

[image or embed]

— Patrick Chovanec (@prchovanec.bsky.social) March 1, 2026 at 10:13 PM

You fools in the media ivory towers don’t realize that in the critical election year, when Donald trump triumphantly campaigns to the country about how he helped kill the supreme leader of Iran, a man with the blood of countless Americans on his hands, American voters will shower our president with…

— Asawin Suebsaeng (@swin24.bsky.social) March 1, 2026 at 10:01 AM

…praise and plaudits ranging all the way from “who are you talking about” to “I can’t buy anything”

— Asawin Suebsaeng (@swin24.bsky.social) March 1, 2026 at 10:02 AM

There’s that number.

[image or embed]

— Malaclypse the Middle (@malaclypse.bsky.social) March 1, 2026 at 6:39 PM

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: «On The Road - Albatrossity - Ducks (not in a row) 3 On The Road – Albatrossity – Ducks (not in a row)
Next Post: It’s Long Past Time It's Long Past Time 1»

Reader Interactions

  • Commenters
  • Filtered
  • Settings

Commenters

No commenters available.

  • Anyway
  • ArchTeryx
  • artem1s
  • Barbara
  • Baud
  • Belafon
  • Betty Cracker
  • Bill Arnold
  • Bruce K in ATH-GR
  • CaseyL
  • Chief Oshkosh
  • cmorenc
  • comrade scotts agenda of rage
  • Dave
  • Deputinize America
  • dnfree
  • Dorothy A. Winsor
  • Enhanced Voting Techniques
  • Expletive Deleted
  • Fair Economist
  • frosty
  • Geminid
  • gene108
  • Geo Wilcox
  • glc
  • Gloria DryGarden
  • Jackie
  • japa21
  • Jeffro
  • Joey Maloney
  • jonas
  • Kayla Rudbek
  • LAC
  • Lapassionara
  • Layer8Problem
  • lowtechcyclist
  • Lyrebird
  • mappy!
  • Marc
  • Martin
  • Matt McIrvin
  • me
  • Miss Bianca
  • narya
  • O. Felix Culpa
  • Old Man Shadow
  • oldgold
  • Omnes Omnibus
  • p.a
  • p.a.
  • PatD
  • Paul in KY
  • Professor Bigfoot
  • prostratedragon
  • Raoul Paste
  • RevRick
  • rikyrah
  • Ruckus
  • sab
  • schrodingers_cat
  • Scout211
  • Soprano2
  • Spanky
  • Sure Lurkalot
  • Suzanne
  • Tony Jay
  • Trivia Man
  • trnc
  • TurnItOffAndOnAgain
  • UncleEbeneezer
  • Warblewarble
  • WaterGirl
  • whca
  • WTFGhost
  • YY_Sima Qian
  • zhena gogolia

Filtered Commenters

No filtered commenters available.

    Settings




    Settings are saved immediately; press X to close the box.

    267Comments

    1. 1.

      Baud

      March 2, 2026 at 7:32 am

      Israeli PM Netanyahu and the Saudi Crown Prince.

      Trump is unifying the Middle East!

      Reply
    2. 2.

      Lapassionara

      March 2, 2026 at 7:34 am

      I think Netanyahu is driving this, so who knows when it will stop.

      Reply
    3. 3.

      p.a.

      March 2, 2026 at 7:37 am

      Bibi will have the US bomb Israel if it keeps him out of jail.

      Reply
    4. 4.

      Baud

      March 2, 2026 at 7:39 am

      Carney signs deals worth billions in diplomatic breakthrough with India’s Modi

      Reply
    5. 5.

      Baud

      March 2, 2026 at 7:43 am

      I wonder what racist thing Trump will do next to shore up his base.

      Reply
    6. 6.

      prostratedragon

      March 2, 2026 at 7:46 am

      News site just getting started: Iran War Dispatches

      Reply
    7. 7.

      Baud

      March 2, 2026 at 7:46 am

      I was hoping that horse actually breathed fire. Am disappointed.

      Reply
    8. 8.

      schrodingers_cat

      March 2, 2026 at 7:48 am

      @Baud: He is uniting all the despots, elected and otherwise.

      Reply
    9. 9.

      prostratedragon

      March 2, 2026 at 7:48 am

      Thought for the day:

      The hard truth: the only real safeguards the US government has against what we’re going through right now is electing and appointing men and women who take their oath to uphold the Constitution seriously. A government built on the honor system crumbles when dishonorable people are in charge.

      Reply
    10. 10.

      schrodingers_cat

      March 2, 2026 at 7:49 am

      @Baud: Attack another blue state.

      Reply
    11. 11.

      Baud

      March 2, 2026 at 7:50 am

      @schrodingers_cat:

      Probably. But that almost seems stale now. He needs to do something fresh.

      Reply
    12. 12.

      Betty Cracker

      March 2, 2026 at 7:52 am

      “NO PANICANS!” Mr. Cheung said in a statement on X. “TRUST IN TRUMP!”

      I dunno, guys, sounds like Cheung is panickin’ to me.

      Reply
    13. 13.

      schrodingers_cat

      March 2, 2026 at 7:52 am

      @Baud: He will do it where his most loyal fanbase, i.e. the beltway media can watch the show. Maryland.

      Reply
    14. 14.

      Suzanne

      March 2, 2026 at 7:55 am

      @Lapassionara:

      I think Netanyahu is driving this, so who knows when it will stop. 

      Netanyahu is evil and smart. Trump is evil and stupid. This is a bad combo.

      Reply
    15. 15.

      Scout211

      March 2, 2026 at 7:58 am

      The Guardian live updates:

      US says three jets ‘went down’ over Kuwait ‘due to an apparent friendly fire incident’

      Kuwait air defences mistakenly shot down three US F15 fighter jets flying in Iran-related operations, the US Central Command (Centcom) said. All sixaircrew ejected safely, have been safely recovered and are in stable condition, it said in a statement which you can read in full here.

      “During active combat-that included attacks from Iranian aircraft, ballistic missiles, and drones – the U.S. Air Force fighter jets were mistakenly shot down by Kuwaiti air defenses,” Centcom said, saying the three jets “went down over Kuwait due to an apparent friendly fire incident”.

      Centcom added that the circumstances surrounding the incident remain under investigation and that additional information would be released as it becomes available.
      We reported in an earlier post that several American warplanes had crashed in Kuwait this morning but the cause was unclear.

      . . .

       

      Fourth US service member ‘killed in action’ – Centcom

      We have another statement in from the US Central Command (Centcom). It says a fourth American service member has died in action (it was previously announced that three US service members had been killed as part of the US war against Iran).

      The full Centcom statement reads:

      As of 7:30 am ET, March 2, four U.S. service members have been killed in action.

      The fourth service member, who was seriously wounded during Iran’s initial attacks, eventually succumbed to their injuries.

      Major combat operations continue and our response effort is ongoing. The identities of the fallen are being withheld until 24 hours after next of kin notification.

      Reply
    16. 16.

      Suzanne

      March 2, 2026 at 8:02 am

      Side note: when and why did Magdi Jacobs (Mangy Jay) go fully insane? She’s now supporting this invasion of Iran as an anti-authoritarian and anti-Trump measure.

      Ostensible liberals supporting an authoritarian committing regime change against another authoritarian (without approval of Congress, I might add) — and calling it an anti-authoritarian move! — is the kind of take one has only when one’s brain is fully cooked by the internet.

      Reply
    17. 17.

      prostratedragon

      March 2, 2026 at 8:04 am

      Politico: Moscow gloats over potential oil price spike from Iran war

      Reply
    18. 18.

      Betty Cracker

      March 2, 2026 at 8:04 am

      @Suzanne: Wait, what? I kinda lost track of her when I quit Twitter, but she used to be pretty level-headed. Wow.

      Reply
    19. 19.

      Baud

      March 2, 2026 at 8:05 am

      @Suzanne:

      Whoa. That sucks

      ETA: I completely get why Iranian expats might be cheering Khamanei’s death. But that “silver lining” does not make what’s happening ok.

      Reply
    20. 20.

      Suzanne

      March 2, 2026 at 8:05 am

      @Betty Cracker: I feel bad because I think she’s had some issues in her personal life, but I also think she’s fallen off the deep end in the last couple of years.

      Reply
    21. 21.

      p.a

      March 2, 2026 at 8:06 am

      Kuwait uninformed about the proceedings because any Arabic-speaking US military has been sacked?//s  I hope.

      Reply
    22. 22.

      Joey Maloney

      March 2, 2026 at 8:06 am

      @p.a.: That’s pretty much what Bibi is doing now, only using the transitive property of blowing shit up.

      Reply
    23. 23.

      Layer8Problem

      March 2, 2026 at 8:08 am

      @Betty Cracker:  “Are you a PANICAN, or are you a PANICAN’T?”

      Reply
    24. 24.

      p.a

      March 2, 2026 at 8:09 am

      @Joey Maloney: The old joke about Israel & KSA fave marching song: Onward Christian Soldiers…

      Reply
    25. 25.

      Suzanne

      March 2, 2026 at 8:09 am

      @Baud: Yeah exactly. One can agree that Khameini is/was terrible and repressive….. and still think this invasion is a terrible thing. The biggest reason: it’s not likely to reduce their oppression, just replace one bad regime with another.

      I hope for a better outcome for them.

      Reply
    26. 26.

      lowtechcyclist

      March 2, 2026 at 8:10 am

      @Betty Cracker: ​

      I dunno, guys, sounds like Cheung is panickin’ to me.

      He is giving off a certain “All is well! Remain calm!” vibe, isn’t he? :D

      Reply
    27. 27.

      Baud

      March 2, 2026 at 8:12 am

      @Betty Cracker:

      @Layer8Problem:

      There’s no reason to become alarmed, and we hope you enjoy the rest of your flight. By the way, is there anyone on board who knows how to fly a plane run a country?”

      Reply
    28. 28.

      lowtechcyclist

      March 2, 2026 at 8:12 am

      @Lapassionara:

      I think Netanyahu is driving this, so who knows when it will stop.

      Riffing off Jethro Tull:

      Ol’ Bibi’s stole the handle, and the train it won’t stop going, no way to slow it down

      Reply
    29. 29.

      WTFGhost

      March 2, 2026 at 8:15 am

      @Baud: Very few horses breathe fire, Baud.

      Reply
    30. 30.

      lowtechcyclist

      March 2, 2026 at 8:18 am

      @prostratedragon:

      Politico: Moscow gloats over potential oil price spike from Iran war

      Seriously, I’d been wondering if Putin was part of the push for war, for exactly that reason. Russia needs money to keep financing its Ukraine invasion, and based on local gasoline prices, I assume oil prices must have been low for many months now.

      Reply
    31. 31.

      lowtechcyclist

      March 2, 2026 at 8:21 am

      @p.a: ​

      Kuwait uninformed about the proceedings because any Arabic-speaking US military has been sacked?//s I hope.

      Knowing too much about non-English-speaking countries, which speaking their languages directly enables, is ‘woke’ of course.

      Reply
    32. 32.

      Geo Wilcox

      March 2, 2026 at 8:21 am

      @lowtechcyclist: He may end up getting stopped if he keep threatening China with blowing up Beijing. China don’t play that game and Israel will be nothing but ashes if they push it.

      Reply
    33. 33.

      lowtechcyclist

      March 2, 2026 at 8:28 am

      @Suzanne:

      One can agree that Khameini is/was terrible and repressive….. and still think this invasion is a terrible thing. The biggest reason: it’s not likely to reduce their oppression, just replace one bad regime with another.

      Not to mention, it’s killing a bunch of people whose only crime is to have been born in Iran.

      Trump, Hegseth, Rubio, and the rest of the people in the Administration driving our foreign policy are mass murderers, pure and simple.

      I wish I could hope for a day when they will be in the dock, being tried for their war crimes.

      Reply
    34. 34.

      WTFGhost

      March 2, 2026 at 8:30 am

      @Suzanne: Things are always different when it’s your country, and, when you swim in a filthy sea of untruths.

      To be brutal, I could see being glad Trump did this, thinking it would sink Trump conclusively, and, being hopeful that the leadership is dead, maybe sound, sensible people will take over.

      The thing is, in any revolution, the ruthless always take power, even if they’re thinking they’re the good guys, acting from purest of motives, and, the most ruthless are rarely the best people. Also, too, everything Trump touches dies.

      I do see reason to hope that this sinks Trumpie-bear-and-the-ridiculous-republicans, but that’s because everything Trump does is stupid, and is as likely as not to have devastatingly stupid results, and warfare, hell, maybe he’ll manage to get a few more planes dropped off of aircraft carriers.

      Reply
    35. 35.

      Geminid

      March 2, 2026 at 8:32 am

      I looked up oilprice.com this morning’s prices. The West Texas Intermediate (WTI) benchmark was $72.59 per barrel. It was $67/bbl going into thr weekend. It was around $56/bbl in early January, before the US military build commenced in the Middle East.

      Murban Crude, a benchmark for Gulf oil, was $82/bbl. That has risen in tandem with the WTI price over the last two months but it jumped even more this weekend.

      I’ve found Rudaw English has good coverage of this war. It’s based in Erbil, the capital of Iraq’s semi-autonomous Kurdistan Regional Government. Iraqi Kurdistan borders the Kurdish-majority provinces of western Iran.

      Reply
    36. 36.

      Barbara

      March 2, 2026 at 8:34 am

      @lowtechcyclist: ​People running Kuwait speak English. It’s widely if not universally taught in Kuwaiti schools.

      Reply
    37. 37.

      schrodingers_cat

      March 2, 2026 at 8:34 am

      @Baud: You should read what she has to say before passing judgment. She has a much more nuanced view of what’s happening than the 2 line blurb in the comments.

      FWIW this is my view.

      Iran has been terrible to its people and has propped despicable organizations  in its neighborhood under the Ayatollahs.

      Also, this foreign policy of executing leadership that we don’t like is a terrible development whether it is Iran or Venezuela. It diminishes us and makes the world unstable.

      Reply
    38. 38.

      oldgold

      March 2, 2026 at 8:34 am

      Strange stuff:

      1.Only mentions Iran in passing during 2 hour.  SOU delivered just 96 hours before initiating war;

      2.Flies to Mar-a-Lago on eve of  war;

      3. Despite functional limitations and bad optics stays at resort for the weekend; and,

      4. 60 hours into the war has not publicly addressed the American people.

      Reply
    39. 39.

      Baud

      March 2, 2026 at 8:35 am

      @schrodingers_cat:

      I’m not on X so your link doesn’t take me to her comments.

      Reply
    40. 40.

      me

      March 2, 2026 at 8:35 am

      Warmongering walrus has doubts about warmongering for a change.  John Bolton Sounds the Alarm on Trump’s Iran Gamble

      Reply
    41. 41.

      Baud

      March 2, 2026 at 8:36 am

      @oldgold:

      Trump was hired to break norms.

      Reply
    42. 42.

      WTFGhost

      March 2, 2026 at 8:36 am

      @p.a: Oh, great, now the ones responsible for sacking the Arabic translators have been sacked. Soon we’ll be having moose messages in the credits again!

       

      @Layer8Problem: Flashing back to “it’s called cannabis not can’tabis”:

      “It’s called crack, not cran’t.”
      “That doesn’t make any sense.”
      “It does if you smoke some.”
      — most West Wing employees by this time.

       

      @lowtechcyclist: “We haven’t hit an iceberg, and if we had, it certainly isn’t the cause of our listing, and, even if it were the cause of our listing, you do all remember this ship is unsinkablubblubblub”

      @lowtechcyclist: Plus, Trump needs to pump up prices, so people will come in to develop Venezuelan oil.

      Reply
    43. 43.

      Expletive Deleted

      March 2, 2026 at 8:36 am

      I suspect the image of the fighter nosediving is going to be seeing a lot of use as the apt metaphor gif of the year.

      Reply
    44. 44.

      prostratedragon

      March 2, 2026 at 8:37 am

      @Barbara:  That friendly fire conclusion sounds a bit hasty, shall we say.

      Reply
    45. 45.

      lowtechcyclist

      March 2, 2026 at 8:39 am

      @Geo Wilcox: ​

      He may end up getting stopped if he keep threatening China with blowing up Beijing. China don’t play that game and Israel will be nothing but ashes if they push it.

      Bibi threatened to blow up Beijing? Holy shit, I missed that. 🫨

      Xi isn’t gonna drop the bomb on Israel. He and the Chinese leadership in general play the long game. But I’m sure China will find a way to make Israel experience consequences.

      Reply
    46. 46.

      schrodingers_cat

      March 2, 2026 at 8:40 am

      @Baud:

      Magdi Jacobs

      @magi_jay

      ·
      Feb 28

      one can have mulitiple thoughts/feelings. i am happy for the iranian people now; & hopeful. that’s my ‘humanitarian’ view, though simplified. i also approach this ‘as an american.’ there is no aumf. no case was made. no plan set forth. i agree w/ shapiro on these points.

      Shapiro here is  the governor of PA not the influencer

      Link to his statement

      Reply
    47. 47.

      prostratedragon

      March 2, 2026 at 8:41 am

      Pahlavi watch:

      This account has warned for years that the many pro-Shah flags at the US Capitol on Jan 6 meant some kind of Trump collusion with supporters of Reza Pahlavi, son of the last Shah. Now Bari Weiss is pushing to install Pahlavi in Iran: the nepo baby son of the last guy we installed there. Not good. 1/[🧵]

      There’s currently a heavy push over X in support of (1) the ongoing attacks on Iran (2) Reza Pahlavi. It’s hard to quickly quantify this wave, but anecdotal evidence shows that the main support hashtags —as well as by the *real* people promoting them — are also pushed inorganically. [🧵]

      Reza Pahlavi was a young man about town in NYC during the early 80s.

      Reply
    48. 48.

      Baud

      March 2, 2026 at 8:43 am

      @schrodingers_cat:

      Thanks. I agree that tweet doesn’t indicate a pro-authoritarian view.

      I think it’s probably premature to be happy for the Iranian people though.

      Reply
    49. 49.

      schrodingers_cat

      March 2, 2026 at 8:45 am

      @Baud: We need to wait and watch before making declarative statements, on that we are in agreement.

      Reply
    50. 50.

      cmorenc

      March 2, 2026 at 8:45 am

      @Suzanne: Never heard of Magdi Jacobs before, even in this almost-top 10k blog.

      Reply
    51. 51.

      RevRick

      March 2, 2026 at 8:49 am

      @lowtechcyclist: This is an illegal war under international law. If an imminent threat is posed to a nation, then a preemptive strike is permitted, as in the Six Day War. But there was no imminent threat. This was an ugly preventative war, based as it is on a hypothetical nuclear warhead atop a theoretical ballistic missile.
      This is an unconstitutional war. Only Congress can make war. It is a usurpation of their power, not that many GOP Senators and Representatives care. They are complicit.

      Then Secretary of State John Quincy Adams, in a speech on July 4, 1821 warned against the impulse of “going abroad seeking monsters to destroy.” Doing that might gain us power on the world stage, but at the cost of the soul of the nation, which is liberty. The Iranian regime was monstrous, but we aren’t the world’s dictator.

      Reply
    52. 52.

      Jeffro

      March 2, 2026 at 8:50 am

      @Betty Cracker: boy that’s some seriously professional communications there, eh?  THAT’s what I like to see coming from my White House!  (eyeroll)

      “Trust in Obama!” said no one, ever, because only trump & Co are this ridiculous.

      Reply
    53. 53.

      prostratedragon

      March 2, 2026 at 8:52 am

      @oldgold: ​

      Trump was asked about Iran [Sunday night], and if he had any message to the families of the service members who were killed.

      He ignored those questions, and instead commented on new statues that he has installed in the rose garden.

      Reply
    54. 54.

      rikyrah

      March 2, 2026 at 8:52 am

      Good Morning, Everyone😊😊😊

      Reply
    55. 55.

      rikyrah

      March 2, 2026 at 8:53 am

      The crazyfication factor in that last tweet👀👀👀🤔🤔

      Reply
    56. 56.

      Chief Oshkosh

      March 2, 2026 at 8:54 am

      @Suzanne: Given that Trump’s plan, according to Jonathan Karl, was to put the #3 or #4 person in charge, clearly the repression would have continued.

      It is impressive how stupid these people are.

      Reply
    57. 57.

      LAC

      March 2, 2026 at 8:54 am

      @lowtechcyclist: Great, the Despot Olympics is definitely a great way to start the week.  All we need is Hegseth setting fire to the torch with his whiskey soaked breath. “Operation Epic Fury” sounds like something he would come up with.

      Reply
    58. 58.

      Jeffro

      March 2, 2026 at 8:54 am

      Mr. Trump’s remarks were limited to the two videos and conversations with individual reporters and outlets, including The New York Times His decision not to give a formal address came after he made little effort before the attack to lay out the case for a military assault against Iran.
      His lack of public engagement…was a striking departure from how other presidents have handled the gravity of war. par for the course for this asshole.

      Fixed that for ya, NYT

      Reply
    59. 59.

      Matt McIrvin

      March 2, 2026 at 8:55 am

      @Suzanne:

      She’s now supporting this invasion of Iran as an anti-authoritarian and anti-Trump measure.

      I’m. Uh. Not getting off the boat, but is the logic here that we should be for it because Trump is heightening his own contradictions?

      If so that’s kind of the secular version of the fundie I mentioned the other day who voted for Trump BECAUSE they think he’s the Antichrist (to make the prophecies happen so Jesus can return!)

      Reply
    60. 60.

      Jeffro

      March 2, 2026 at 8:55 am

      @me: man…hell hath surely frozen over when John. Freaking. Bolton. is saying, “whoa now on this attacking Iran thing”

      for real

      Reply
    61. 61.

      mappy!

      March 2, 2026 at 8:56 am

      Venezuela, Iran, Cuba

      Assassination R Us.

      Reply
    62. 62.

      trnc

      March 2, 2026 at 8:56 am

      @Betty Cracker: ​
       “NO PANIC, NO PANIC, YOU’RE THE PANIC!!!!”

      Reply
    63. 63.

      zhena gogolia

      March 2, 2026 at 8:57 am

      @cmorenc: See her full statement at #46.

      Reply
    64. 64.

      rikyrah

      March 2, 2026 at 8:57 am

      @prostratedragon:

      No lie told.

      I stand by this.

      The Founding Fathers, flawed as they were, saw the Orange Menace coming over 250+ years ago.

      What they never accounted for was the other branches of our Republic turning their backs and betraying their oaths to the CONSTITUTION.

       

      THAT, IS WHAT THEY FAILED TO SEE.

      Reply
    65. 65.

      zhena gogolia

      March 2, 2026 at 8:57 am

      @Matt McIrvin: See #46.

      Reply
    66. 66.

      Geminid

      March 2, 2026 at 8:58 am

      @cmorenc: Magdi Jacobs goes by the Twitter handle, “Mangy Jay.” She’s been reposted here under that name.

      Reply
    67. 67.

      Trivia Man

      March 2, 2026 at 8:58 am

      @WTFGhost: Now that Rump is his own oil state (Venezuela slush fund), suddenly high oil prices look like a swell idea.

      Reply
    68. 68.

      Spanky

      March 2, 2026 at 8:58 am

      @oldgold: What would look different if the country was being run by a cabal of advisers while a mostly brain dead president slowly dissipates?

      Reply
    69. 69.

      WTFGhost

      March 2, 2026 at 8:59 am

      @Chief Oshkosh: So we’re definitely clearly stating that the US is okay with assassination for regime change.

      Man. I’m sure that’s okay – there is no easy way to assassinate people in the US, because the Iranians don’t have missiles that can reach us yet, and just like Charlie Kirk, Patron Saint of Getting Shot reminds us… um… damn.

      I don’t think I would have enacted a policy of deliberate assassination if I lived in America, and had any love of, you know, spaces where there are 100+yd lines of sight.

      Reply
    70. 70.

      Chief Oshkosh

      March 2, 2026 at 9:00 am

      @prostratedragon:

      Now Bari Weiss is pushing to install Pahlavi in Iran:

      One of the least-accomplished, biggest know-nothings on the planet has a say about this?

      At this rate, I’ll vote for anyone who declares that the Murdochs, Weisses, etc. will be immediately investigated for, hell, for just breathing good air.

      Reply
    71. 71.

      schrodingers_cat

      March 2, 2026 at 9:00 am

      @zhena gogolia: Magdi has been vociferous against antisemitism emanating from the horseshoe left, that makes her a target for attacks by our progressive betters.

      Reply
    72. 72.

      Baud

      March 2, 2026 at 9:00 am

      @rikyrah:

      Good morning.

      Reply
    73. 73.

      rikyrah

      March 2, 2026 at 9:00 am

      @schrodingers_cat:

      That play is getting old, because, one way or another, the Blue cities in Blue States are finding ways to fight back. They bet on the Blue Cities and Blue States buckling to them, and that hasn’t happened.

      Also, Black people are still resting, and the visuals of them mistreating YT PEOPLE just doesn’t hit the same way for their evil purposes.😒😒

      Reply
    74. 74.

      Trivia Man

      March 2, 2026 at 9:01 am

      Instead of a resolution condemning the war, i am convinced by the opposite argument. Push for a vote granting AUMF. If the resolution says NO NO NO, he can veto it for half assed cover.

      If APPROVAL fails it strikes me as s crystal clear denial. IANAL, YMMV

      Reply
    75. 75.

      schrodingers_cat

      March 2, 2026 at 9:02 am

      @Trivia Man: It is. But it is something that they have done again and again.

      Reply
    76. 76.

      narya

      March 2, 2026 at 9:02 am

      Someone referred to the operation as “Operation Epstein Fury,” and I’d like to see that picked up . . .

      Reply
    77. 77.

      rikyrah

      March 2, 2026 at 9:02 am

       

      The Mayor of New York City hit a good one with the street shoveling hiring of regular New Yorkers. Those sidewalks have never looked so clean. And, I don’t just  mean the Upper East and West Sides. New Yorkers walk everywhere, so having clean sidewalks after a snow blizzard is very important. People not mad about the hourly rate paid when they can walk the streets and not worry about slipping and sliding. It is good government.

      Reply
    78. 78.

      Chief Oshkosh

      March 2, 2026 at 9:03 am

      @LAC:

      All we need is Hegseth setting fire to the torch with his whiskey soaked breath.

      Hey Baud! There’s your fire-breathing horse(‘s ass)!

      Reply
    79. 79.

      Trivia Man

      March 2, 2026 at 9:04 am

      @mappy!: If it were still Fidel in charge cuba would 100% be on the table.

      Reply
    80. 80.

      Trivia Man

      March 2, 2026 at 9:06 am

      @narya: I’M DOING MY PART

      (insert Starship Troopers gif)

      Reply
    81. 81.

      Barbara

      March 2, 2026 at 9:07 am

      @Trivia Man: ​I don’t think resolutions can be vetoed though I understand what you’re saying.

      Reply
    82. 82.

      jonas

      March 2, 2026 at 9:08 am

      @Trivia Man:

      Trump: “Oh, so oil prices are too low to make investing in upgrading Venezuela’s infrastructure worthwhile, are they?”

      *Bombs Iran*

      Trump: “So how do you like them apples?”

      Also Trump: “These high oil prices are the fault of woke liberals!”

      Reply
    83. 83.

      Trivia Man

      March 2, 2026 at 9:08 am

      @rikyrah: Team Evil had a clever counterattack based in ID requirements for the shovelers. Bad faith, false equivalency, and many more fallacies – but dollars to doughnuts it comes up in EVERY discussion on voter id this year.

      Reply
    84. 84.

      prostratedragon

      March 2, 2026 at 9:09 am

      @rikyrah:  Actually, I think they did fear it. But if you try to guarantee somehow that that can’t happen, do you still have a democracy?

      Not saying we should never think about modifying the Constitution, or voting systems, mind; but in the end it still comes down to what eclectic brotha said.

      Reply
    85. 85.

      Geminid

      March 2, 2026 at 9:10 am

      @Geminid: Rudaw English posted this four hours ago:

         Iran’s Red Crescent says 555 people have been killed in US and Israeli attacks since the start of the air campaign against the country.

      And more recently:

         Musoureh Khojasteh Baherzadeh, the wife of Iran’s late Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khameini, has succumbed to her injuries after being targeted by US-Israeli strike– Iran state media.

      She was at Khameini’s home when it was hit in the first minutes of the war Saturday.

      Now Rudaw English is carrying live coverage of Joint Chiefs Chairman Dan Caine’s press briefing at the Pentagon.

      Reply
    86. 86.

      Enhanced Voting Techniques

      March 2, 2026 at 9:11 am

      @p.a.: Bibi will have the US bomb Israel if it keeps him out of jail.

      Oh yes this, it was clear that Bibi is all for the Iran War because it will derail Trump’s plan to rebuild Gaza.

      Reply
    87. 87.

      prostratedragon

      March 2, 2026 at 9:11 am

      @narya:  It’s catching on. I’ve seen it in different places this weekend. Also Operation Epstein Disruption.

      Reply
    88. 88.

      Suzanne

      March 2, 2026 at 9:12 am

      @Matt McIrvin: Here’s the longest tweet I’ve seen from her on this:

      people keep asking, ‘yes, but what will happen next?’

      it’s good people ask this. it’s what should have been asked of iraq & afghanistan. it was right to ask it of syria, but frankly obama was a bit too beholden to the fear of consequences in that case, imho. though, that judgment is much informed by hindsight on my part. there was arguably a point where intervention would have worked early in that conflict when there was a government-in-waiting/prior to entrenched sectarianism.

      so it is good that people ask this question. but it’s also important to know that iran is meaningfully different from the above cases. every society has tensions, factions, etc, but iranian “society” is something that exists in a more cohesive form within the borders of the nationstate. there is less sectarianism and inter-ethnic warring than in iraq, syria, or afghanistan.

      iran has a persian ethno-linguistic majority and a pre-existing national identity that predates the islamic republic by millennia. The IRI was parasitic on that identity, but it doesn’t constitute it. iraq and afghanistan, in contrast, were, to a significant degree, colonial border constructions that papered over internal fractures. these aren’t deterministic facts, but they matter enormously for what fills a vacuum. iran also has a powerful & rather cohesive diaspora w/ resources.

      importantly, there is also buy-in from the population. both cohesive, internal opposition to the regime and what increasingly looks like possible coordination w/ israel. there are *already* pro-democratic groups w/ ties to places like israel. now, does this mean there won’t be a power vacuum? that an authoritarian despot wont come to power? absolutely not. there *are* most certainly factions–islamists, reformists, labour/leftists/monarchists, MEK, etc–within iran and it is *not* clear what will happen next. that said: one glance at the structure of afghanistan or iraq should have informed ‘interventionists’ that there WOULD almost DEFINITELY be quagmires, vacuums, & sectarian violence; one looks at iran, in contrast, and sees real ingredients for something different.

      this isnt a defense of the intervention, though it could form one/many of the premises of such a defense. but, overall, justification is a separate conversation. one that looks different for israel vs. u.s., imho.

       
      So, in short: “I’m not saying invading Iran is justified…. but I’m not not saying that, either.”

      Good Lord.

      Reply
    89. 89.

      Jeffro

      March 2, 2026 at 9:12 am

      @rikyrah:

      What they never accounted for was the other branches of our Republic turning their backs and betraying their oaths to the CONSTITUTION.

      THAT, IS WHAT THEY FAILED TO SEE.

      100%

      That, plus the downside of having essentially ZERO requirements to run for and win the presidency.

      No prior government service requirement.  No mandatory putting of assets in trust.  No background check.  No tax disclosures.  No bans on felons running for office.

      Reply
    90. 90.

      jonas

      March 2, 2026 at 9:16 am

      @Jeffro: Bolton is fine with attacking Iran. His whole life has been leading up to this moment. I think what concerns him is that Trump is doing this for shits and giggles and to seize oil fields, not to fundamentally change the regime and democratize the Middle East. As if that was ever going to happen either, but Trump’s not even pretending there’s some higher, nobler goal here.

      Reply
    91. 91.

      YY_Sima Qian

      March 2, 2026 at 9:16 am

      @Scout211: This follows another friendly fire incident by the USN during the war against the Houthis, where 1 F/A-18 was shot down & another narrowly escaped. In both cases the U.S. aircraft operated in very permissive environments, facing not aerial opposition.

      Reply
    92. 92.

      Tony Jay

      March 2, 2026 at 9:16 am

      WAPO Editorial Analysis

      After what some hostile observers outside of the presidential planning loop have described as a potentially damaging delay in identifying the immediate causes, objectives and projected endgame of his turn towards a warfighting pose vis a vis Iran, President Trump’s late night admission on his social media platform that concerns about a range of domestic political issues had, at least partially, prodded him towards a more aggressive mindset, marks an important milestone in the Administration’s efforts to provide Americans with the clarity of understanding the polls would suggest some of them currently lack, and leaves Democrat leaders, already nervous that their partisan carping might come to be viewed as a form of support for the Ayatollah’s crumbling regime, still empty handed in their endless pursuit of a rhetorical cudgel potent enough to discomfit a sitting ‘War President’.

      Any day now, I imagine.

      Reply
    93. 93.

      narya

      March 2, 2026 at 9:17 am

      @prostratedragon: Good. Like “Kavanaugh stops.”

      Reply
    94. 94.

      Matt McIrvin

      March 2, 2026 at 9:18 am

      @Suzanne: It seems to me that if we wanted to kill the Iranian pro-democracy movement, this would be the most effective way to do it.

      Reply
    95. 95.

      prostratedragon

      March 2, 2026 at 9:19 am

      @Trivia Man:

      From Thursday:

      Cuba’s humanitarian situation is worsening as fuel shortages deepen nearly a month after Washington took measures to block oil supplies from entering the Caribbean nation, a senior UN official warned on Wednesday.

      Reply
    96. 96.

      Matt McIrvin

      March 2, 2026 at 9:20 am

      @Tony Jay: Could they blink something in Morse code?

      Reply
    97. 97.

      Geminid

      March 2, 2026 at 9:20 am

      @Suzanne: I thought that was fairly sound analysis on Magdi Jacob’s part. I’m glad you posted it.

      Reply
    98. 98.

      Dorothy A. Winsor

      March 2, 2026 at 9:20 am

      @prostratedragon: He’s happiest when he’s decorating.

      Reply
    99. 99.

      Baud

      March 2, 2026 at 9:22 am

      @Geminid:

      Yeah, I don’t see anything problematic there either.

      Reply
    100. 100.

      Jeffro

      March 2, 2026 at 9:23 am

      someone on BlueSky noted that trumpov & Co are trying to do “drive-through colonization” and that’s just about right

      Reply
    101. 101.

      prostratedragon

      March 2, 2026 at 9:24 am

      @Dorothy A. Winsor:  It’s a shame when one’s safest and most productive activity is producing travesties.

      Reply
    102. 102.

      Raoul Paste

      March 2, 2026 at 9:24 am

      @mappy!: Apparently it really now IS the Department of War, not the Department of of Defense.

      Reply
    103. 103.

      Jeffro

      March 2, 2026 at 9:25 am

      oh good

      we don’t have much going on at the moment, we should definitely stir up some shit with Cuba

      Reply
    104. 104.

      Betty Cracker

      March 2, 2026 at 9:25 am

      Trump is totally incoherent on Iran in a way that’s probably going to get a lot more people killed than the initial bombing toll, unless they wisely disregard everything he says.

      In the video that announced the attack, he told Iranian civilians the hour of their freedom is at hand, urged them to stay inside during the bombing and overthrow their government when the all-clear sounds. He twice warned the military to lay down their arms or face “certain death,” a threat that rings somewhat hollow due to a lack of enforcement capability on the ground.

      The next day, he told a reporter he’s ready to “negotiate” and said the admin is trying to identify an official with whom to negotiate, but oops, we killed all the ones on the list, so we’re still looking. This is basically the Venezuela option, i.e., decapitate the regime but leave the shitty existing government in place and deal with the successors.

      Well, which is it, motherfucker? Sure sounds like he went into this without a coherent plan and is in reaction mode. Not ideal!

      Reply
    105. 105.

      jonas

      March 2, 2026 at 9:26 am

      @Tony Jay: I’m glad I caught your byline there before putting my fist through the computer screen.

      Reply
    106. 106.

      Suzanne

      March 2, 2026 at 9:26 am

      @Matt McIrvin: I loathe her whole framing that “justification” is a separate discussion from success, I.e. “what happens next”. I do not care if your intent is good if the effect is bad, because you have no skillset to execute. We all lived through endless, grinding wars that happened because we had no successful strategy to “win the peace”. Good intentions do not mean a damn thing, and FFOTUS/Bibi do not even have good intentions.

      I don’t know anybody (especially a liberal) who has watched Trump and Netanyahu for twenty minutes would respond to this unprovoked invasion with equivocate-y nonsense.

      Reply
    107. 107.

      prostratedragon

      March 2, 2026 at 9:27 am

      I hate even to post this:

      Under a new policy released Thursday, the Trump Administration will test conversion therapy on trans people in prisons. It explicitly states that it aims to help trans people “recover,” all the while forcibly detransitioning them both medically and socially.

      transitics.substack.com/p/the-trump-administration-is-testing

      Since sometime in the 45 term I have suspected the guy was envious of someone else’s numbers.

      Reply
    108. 108.

      p.a

      March 2, 2026 at 9:28 am

      @Enhanced Voting Techniques: Oh yes this, it was clear that Bibi is all for the Iran War because it will derail Trump’s plan to rebuild Gaza.

       

       

      Very old Onion article (Arafat); “Palestine Leads World in Production of Rubble”

      Reply
    109. 109.

      jonas

      March 2, 2026 at 9:30 am

      @Betty Cracker: “Rise up and overthrow your oppressors! By the way, meet the new boss, same as the old boss…”

      Insert Nathan Fillion gif here

      Reply
    110. 110.

      Suzanne

      March 2, 2026 at 9:32 am

      @Geminid: IMO, she is irresponsibly separating “justification” for this attack from discussion of “what happens next”. That is ludicrous and dangerous. Also the implication that Israel is more justified in doing this. Stop.

      We’ve knocked over an apple cart with no reasonable plan to clean it up. Just blew up a bunch of little girls in doing so. Made no case to the American people that this is in our or their best interest.

      Reply
    111. 111.

      Kayla Rudbek

      March 2, 2026 at 9:33 am

      @schrodingers_cat: I think I did see something about that on Bluesky (that at least 100 ICE/CBP vehicles are being sent to Maryland from Minnesota)

      Reply
    112. 112.

      Suzanne

      March 2, 2026 at 9:34 am

      @Betty Cracker:

      Well, which is it, motherfucker? Sure sounds like he went into this without a coherent plan and is in reaction mode. Not ideal! 

      THIS.

      Reply
    113. 113.

      Scout211

      March 2, 2026 at 9:36 am

      @Betty Cracker: Thank you for that summary.

      This is a worry:

      He twice warned the military to lay down their arms or face “certain death,” a threat that rings somewhat hollow due to a lack of enforcement capability on the ground.

      NBC found a flaw in Hegeth’s statement this morning. He confirmed that there were no troops on the ground but did not answer the question of whether that would be a future plan.

      Pete Hegseth does not rule out boots on the ground

      Trump told us he was in control and could end this immediately or maybe in five days.  Now boots on the ground may be an option.

      PNAC part two, boogaloo!

      Reply
    114. 114.

      Jackie

      March 2, 2026 at 9:37 am

      During a press conference at the Pentagon early morning, DOD Secretary Pete Hegseth launched a belligerent defense of the attack on Iran, and sneered at traditional US allies over “pearl-clutching” and the press for spreading “fake news.”

      At the same time, he set off a social media firestorm by promising he would set aside traditional rules of engagement designed to prevent war crimes.

      After an over-the-top claim that the initial attack the US conducted the “most lethal aerial assault in history,” he boasted, “Israel has clear missions as well for which we are grateful. Capable partners are good partners, unlike so many of our traditional allies who wring their hands and clutch their pearls, hemming and hawing about the use of force,” before asserting there would be “no stupid rules of engagement.”

      “’No stupid rules of engagement’ means no Geneva Conventions or other international humanitarian laws, which the U.S. signed and supported for more than a century. Hegseth and Trump are war criminals,” observed former Chicago Tribune editor Mark Jacobs.

      Analyst Leah McElrath wrote, “No stupid rules of engagement” is one for the history books—and not in a good way.”

      Democratization Policy Council founder Toby Fogel warned, “‘no stupid rules of engagement’ is a great way to go to jail for war crimes.”

      “I don’t know how many times it needs to be said, but rules of engagement are for the safety of our troops as much as they’re for protecting civilian lives. F—— idiot running the joint,” pointed out academic Lee Papa who goes by “Rude Pundit.”

      National security analyst Stephanie Carvin wrote, “’No stupid rules of engagement’ is nihilism.”

      This is why so many generals think he’s a complete fool,” explained journalist Will Harris.

      —RawStory

      Reply
    115. 115.

      Geminid

      March 2, 2026 at 9:39 am

      @Betty Cracker: Trump’s no Planican, that’s for sure.

      The actual attack plan was formulated by some folks up your way– the CENTCOM staff at MacDill Air Force Base in Tampa. I think part of Joint Chiefs Chairman Dan Caine’s job is to keep Trump from micro-managing it.

      Susan Wiles seems to working with Caine to that end. At least, that’s the impression I got from pictures taken at Mar-a-Loco this weekend.

      Reply
    116. 116.

      Belafon

      March 2, 2026 at 9:39 am

      @prostratedragon: Build a government that can function properly if no humans in it do the right thing.

      Reply
    117. 117.

      Tony Jay

      March 2, 2026 at 9:39 am

      @jonas:

      Like the Byzantine emperors of old, I find a little bit of harmless exposure to poisons can be helpful in building up an immunity to their effects.

      Reply
    118. 118.

      frosty

      March 2, 2026 at 9:39 am

      @Tony Jay: Democrat leaders

      From the WaPo editorial board? That’s a tell.

      ETA: @jonas: Glad you figured it out, I didn’t!

      ETA2: Nice job, Tony Jay. You had me fooled.

      Reply
    119. 119.

      Scout211

      March 2, 2026 at 9:40 am

      @Jackie: I’m not sure that Hegseth is the useful idiot that they expected him to be.  Yikes.

      Reply
    120. 120.

      Spanky

      March 2, 2026 at 9:40 am

      @Kayla Rudbek:

       I think I did see something about that on Bluesky (that at least 100 ICE/CBP vehicles are being sent to Maryland from Minnesota)

      Well this’ll be fun. We’re not “Minnesota nice”.

      Reply
    121. 121.

      Soprano2

      March 2, 2026 at 9:40 am

      @me: Oh man, we really are in the upside down now!

      Reply
    122. 122.

      Warblewarble

      March 2, 2026 at 9:40 am

      Rest assured “God is on his throne” . Same as when Hakims ancestors were shipped to America.

      Reply
    123. 123.

      jonas

      March 2, 2026 at 9:40 am

      @prostratedragon: This just another in a long line of Project 2025 attempts to prove evangelical Christianity and its perceptions of gender norms is correct and take vengeance upon the libs for banning gay conversion therapy. Just as all the attacks on universities under Trump is revenge for forcing Christian segregation academies and universities to integrate in the 70s. I’m sure next they’ll try tying all federal science funding to teaching creationism in biology and geology classrooms.

      Reply
    124. 124.

      WTFGhost

      March 2, 2026 at 9:41 am

      @Trivia Man: The war powers resolution doesn’t require a signature, just a simple majority in both houses. Whether it will get that simple majority is another question.

       

      @rikyrah: Well, you can’t really prevent a corrupt system if enough people are willing to lie to corrupt it. The courts could be playing us fairly, but they’re not. The administration, and Congress, could be playing us fair, telling us mostly-true things, rather than thinking of us as mushroom citizens (kept in the dark and fed BS), but they aren’t.

      If Republicans had just admitted the donald had committed crimes, that, yes, if he had those documents, he was in big trouble; that yes, he shouldn’t have tried to overthrow the election, and that yes, he was convicted fairly and properly of accounting fraud, pursuant to another crime, making it 34 felony convictions, well, maybe we wouldn’t be here. But when they’re all willing to lie, so outrageously, how do you design around that?

      Unfortunately, I feel this is like – what did Asimov have in his Foundations series, a “Seldon crisis” or somesuch, some predictable, necessary crisis that has to arise for humanity to grow past it?

      I think America had to come up against a totally corrupt political party, one that’s corrupted itself over generations, so we could figure out how we’ll grow from the experience, and be a better nation, without overcompensating. e.g., one red state decided to prevent a governor from issuing health emergencies any longer, because oooooh, evil-covid-shutdown! So that’s likely going to lead to pointless suffering and death, and that’s why we can’t tie future people down… we need a better way.

      Reply
    125. 125.

      Geminid

      March 2, 2026 at 9:41 am

      @Suzanne: I thought Jacobs got it right. Those are in fact separate questions.

      Ed. And I thought her comments in other posts, about people dismissing the agency of Iranian, hit the mark. I think I’ve seen that here.

      Reply
    126. 126.

      Spanky

      March 2, 2026 at 9:42 am

      @Jackie: What ever happened to the time honored tradition of fragging?

      Reply
    127. 127.

      jonas

      March 2, 2026 at 9:42 am

      @Tony Jay: Lol!

      Reply
    128. 128.

      Soprano2

      March 2, 2026 at 9:43 am

      @prostratedragon: These people are IDIOTS who know NOTHING about Iran. The Shah was hated by Iranians of their day! He was as bad as the current government. The guy I dated in college from Iran was sent here to go to school specifically to keep him out of the Shah’s army. He was repressive, as bad as these people are. They exchanged one dictator for another, although that’s not what they thought they were doing at the time. This is as dumb as the people who thought they were going to install Ahmed Chalibi as ruler of Iraq; hell, it’s probably being run by some of the same people or their disciples. Good grief…..

      Reply
    129. 129.

      Soprano2

      March 2, 2026 at 9:45 am

      @Baud: I agree, it’s hard to be glad for people who are having bombs dropped on their heads by us right now because FFOTUS’ ego needed a boost. Especially since we have no idea how it’s going to turn out. What’s happening in Venezuela right now, does anyone know? The press lost interest in that pretty quickly – we captured Maduro, problem solved as far as they’re concerned.

      Reply
    130. 130.

      Suzanne

      March 2, 2026 at 9:46 am

      @Geminid: Strong disagree. I don’t care how much someone needs surgery — I am not going to attempt to perform it. I don’t know how. America doesn’t know how to stabilize Iran, either.

      Of course, I also think that the Iraq War was an unjustified debacle that led to massive suffering and death and destabilization.

      Reply
    131. 131.

      UncleEbeneezer

      March 2, 2026 at 9:46 am

      @schrodingers_cat: Thank you.  I can’t believe someone actually typed that she’s “supporting” it, which is such a misleading interpretation of what Magdi’s actually written.

      Actually, I can…people have been misrepresenting her views here for a very long time because she doesn’t shy away from complexity and multiple things being true and being open to being wrong in a way that is much more challenging than simplistic binary narratives.  I would encourage people to read her actual words.  She’s been signal-boosting the voices of people who have been the victims of Iran.  Iranians, Syrians, Yemeni, and yes, Israelis too.  You can’t just hand wave away decades of terrorism targeting the entire MENA region, killing of Americans as well, attempts to meddle in elections all over the world (including ours), and the horrible oppression of Iranian minorities subjecting them to harsh Islamic rule.  You can oppose the way this war has happened, oppose Trump, oppose Netanyahu etc., and still be open to the fact that this regime falling may be a net good.

      Reply
    132. 132.

      Soprano2

      March 2, 2026 at 9:47 am

      @prostratedragon: More proof, if we needed any more, that he’s a psychopath.

      Reply
    133. 133.

      Anyway

      March 2, 2026 at 9:48 am

      @jonas:  and democratize the Middle East.

      Netanyahu, KSA regime, Egyptian dictator — all live in total fear of any kind of democracy coming to the Middle East.

      Reply
    134. 134.

      Tony Jay

      March 2, 2026 at 9:48 am

      @frosty:

      The trick is to be read as visibly bending backwards, pate to taint, in order to avoid any words or phrases that might cast a sliver of shadow across the Orange Palace’s shifting narratives.

      The sneering at Dems is their version of a palate cleanser.

      Reply
    135. 135.

      LAC

      March 2, 2026 at 9:48 am

      @Betty Cracker: Exactly! He is too busy siphoning money, adding gold lame to his shitty statutes and plastering his mottled orange facade to buildings to actually have to offer any coherent plan.  That’s for suckers .

      Reply
    136. 136.

      Omnes Omnibus

      March 2, 2026 at 9:49 am

      The fact the the government of Iran is awful does not change the fact that this war is illegal under both US and international law.

      Reply
    137. 137.

      trnc

      March 2, 2026 at 9:50 am

      @Jeffro: ​
       

      That, plus the downside of having essentially ZERO requirements to run for and win the presidency.

      No prior government service requirement. No mandatory putting of assets in trust. No background check. No tax disclosures. No bans on felons running for office.

      This! It was bad enough to have to choose a president in the late 18th century when some voters had almost no access to information about the candidates. Amazingly, it’s worse in a world of information (and misinformation) overload.

      Reply
    138. 138.

      Soprano2

      March 2, 2026 at 9:50 am

      @rikyrah: On Fox News evidently the big news from New York City is that the police got in the middle of a big snowball fight and that’s bad for Mandami somehow. I had to laugh, who the fuck cares about that other than people who watch Fox News?

      Reply
    139. 139.

      Suzanne

      March 2, 2026 at 9:50 am

      @Omnes Omnibus: Sing it.

      Reply
    140. 140.

      gene108

      March 2, 2026 at 9:52 am

      @prostratedragon:

      the only real safeguards the US government has against what we’re going through right now is electing and appointing men and women who take their oath to uphold the Constitution seriously. A government built on the honor system crumbles when dishonorable people are in charge.

      People in power, from all parties, operating at a basic level of good faith is required for the rule of law to work.

      It doesn’t matter what the laws are when the legislature decides to do nothing to prevent illegal actions by the executive.

      Doesn’t matter what the laws are when a country’s highest court decides a former executive indicted for crimes has absolute immunity.

      As long as Republicans are party over country on everything laws are meaningless.

      There’s no system that can survive when people running it or have power in it operate solely for their own interests.

      Reply
    141. 141.

      Bruce K in ATH-GR

      March 2, 2026 at 9:52 am

      @Spanky: “Sic semper tyrannis” seems uncomfortably apropos these days, doesn’t it?

      Reply
    142. 142.

      schrodingers_cat

      March 2, 2026 at 9:54 am

      @Omnes Omnibus: I agree. Also, we don’t have to pretend that the Iranian regime was blameless and wonderful because of who is currently in the WH and how this operation went down.

      Reply
    143. 143.

      TurnItOffAndOnAgain

      March 2, 2026 at 9:55 am

      @WTFGhost:

      I think America had to come up against a totally corrupt political party, one that’s corrupted itself over generations, so we could figure out how we’ll grow from the experience, and be a better nation, without overcompensating. e.g., one red state decided to prevent a governor from issuing health emergencies any longer, because oooooh, evil-covid-shutdown! So that’s likely going to lead to pointless suffering and death, and that’s why we can’t tie future people down… we need a better way.

      I get what you’re saying, that unfortunately there’s often a lack of widespread foresight that allows problems to get bulwarked before they come up, but this tells a story where half a thousand (and climbing) brown people have to die for America’s character development.

      (And that’s if you’re not counting Bush II’s and prior misadventures in the middle east, which paved the way for this shit.)

      That’s not a framing I care for.

      Reply
    144. 144.

      Matt McIrvin

      March 2, 2026 at 9:55 am

      @prostratedragon: who’s his Dr. Mengele?

      Reply
    145. 145.

      schrodingers_cat

      March 2, 2026 at 9:55 am

      @UncleEbeneezer: You are most welcome!

      BTW Joe Biden or Kamala Harris would have never done this. So we have the Uncommited Movement among others to thank for this.

      Someone will be right along to call you an Islamophobe.

      *Begins countdown

      Reply
    146. 146.

      Professor Bigfoot

      March 2, 2026 at 9:56 am

      @lowtechcyclist: Ain’t it funny how everything this administration does seems to benefit Russia and Putin?

      And NOTHING it does ever HARMS Russia or Russian interests?

      William of Ockham is screaming.

      Reply
    147. 147.

      Soprano2

      March 2, 2026 at 9:56 am

      @Suzanne: I think they believe the American people already see Iran as evil, so they don’t have to make the case. It’s a foolish belief, but I think that’s what they believe.

      Reply
    148. 148.

      lowtechcyclist

      March 2, 2026 at 9:56 am

      @Matt McIrvin:

      If so that’s kind of the secular version of the fundie I mentioned the other day who voted for Trump BECAUSE they think he’s the Antichrist (to make the prophecies happen so Jesus can return!)

      Why vote for the lesser of two evils when you can vote for the guy you believe is the GREATEST of evils?

      Reply
    149. 149.

      Geminid

      March 2, 2026 at 9:58 am

      @Bruce K in ATH-GR: I’m curious: did the drone strike on the UK base in Cyprus create much of a stiramong Greeks? I read that Greece’s Navy is sending a couple ships that way in response.

      Reply
    150. 150.

      Belafon

      March 2, 2026 at 9:58 am

      @Bruce K in ATH-GR: Sick simpering tyrant?

      Reply
    151. 151.

      Spanky

      March 2, 2026 at 9:59 am

      @Bruce K in ATH-GR: To be clear, I was referring to Kegsbreath. As he will surely continue to make these stupid statements, and US personnel will continue to be killed and,  probably worse, captured, somebody with access to appropriate weaponry is going to make the calculation that the cost of shutting him up is lower than leaving him to mouth on.

      Reply
    152. 152.

      comrade scotts agenda of rage

      March 2, 2026 at 9:59 am

      @Scout211:

      Pete Hegseth does not rule out boots on the ground

      That’s in contrast to what whack job Anna Paulina Luna was saying Sunday evening of on all outlets, MS NOW.

      The hosts pushed back on many of her lies which resulted in nothing more than everybody talking over each other.  It was actually refreshing to see.

      But one thing that she kept saying was how there would be ‘no boots on the ground’.  It was clearly a talking point she was there to push.

      Which all means this (mal)Administration has no plan other than to help Bibi finally bombbombbombIran.

      Reply
    153. 153.

      Jackie

      March 2, 2026 at 9:59 am

      Wall Street acting predictably: Oil, natural gas and gold prices surging, while everything else is in the red – 🔻-443 +/-…

      Reply
    154. 154.

      Soprano2

      March 2, 2026 at 9:59 am

      @Jackie: This is an old belief, that the reason we’ve lost wars is because we’ve been too soft and used “rules of engagement” rather than being like Ghengis Khan. I’ve heard that said about Vietnam. What these idiots don’t understand is that the rules are for our protection as much as other people’s.

      Reply
    155. 155.

      Miss Bianca

      March 2, 2026 at 10:00 am

      @Suzanne:

      So, in short: “I’m not saying invading Iran is justified…. but I’m not not saying that, either.”

      She took an awful lot of words to say, “hey, look – even an illegal, immoral, unethical, and just plain STOOPID act of aggression against another sovereign nation has its up side!”

      Reply
    156. 156.

      CaseyL

      March 2, 2026 at 10:00 am

      Besides Trump’s own pathologies, the US war in the MidEast is also being driven by a bunch of crackpot Christian End Timers who have been longing for Armageddon since forever.

      I wonder what our “allies” in the conflict will think about that once it is made clear to them – as Hegseth is doing.

      Reply
    157. 157.

      Omnes Omnibus

      March 2, 2026 at 10:01 am

      @schrodingers_cat:  Who is pretending that the Iranian regime is wonderful and blameless?

      Reply
    158. 158.

      trnc

      March 2, 2026 at 10:03 am

      @Raoul Paste: ​
       Wait a minute – are you telling me Donald is not actually a peace loving dove?

      Reply
    159. 159.

      Scout211

      March 2, 2026 at 10:03 am

      Just to remind everyone why this is happening now (not that jackals really need reminding )

      Judd Legum:

      The money behind the new Iran War

      In private calls over the last several weeks, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) reportedly urged President Trump to attack Iran. Iran is a top regional rival of Saudi Arabia, and MBS had become concerned about Iran’s growing military capabilities.

      The lobbying campaign achieved success on Saturday, when Trump announced he had begun “major combat operations in Iran.” Trump launched a war even though U.S. intelligence assessed that Iran posed no imminent threat to the United States. In June 2025, Trump publicly declared that more limited strikes “completely obliterated Iran’s nuclear capability.”

      MBS’s influence with Trump has grown as the Saudi government has invested billions in projects that personally enrich Trump and his son-in-law, Jared Kushner.

      Reply
    160. 160.

      Matt McIrvin

      March 2, 2026 at 10:04 am

      @Jackie: Hegseth makes Cheney, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz look like a bunch of geniuses.

      Reply
    161. 161.

      lowtechcyclist

      March 2, 2026 at 10:06 am

      @Tony Jay:

      WAPO Editorial Analysis

      Comes across to me as just a bunch of random blithering, rather than any sort of coherent thought.

      Reply
    162. 162.

      trnc

      March 2, 2026 at 10:06 am

      @prostratedragon: ​
       What kind of “testing” will be done? Letting the other inmates loose to beat the shit out of trans people until they’re dead or can no longer speak for themselves?

      Reply
    163. 163.

      prostratedragon

      March 2, 2026 at 10:07 am

      @Matt McIrvin:  I’m sure nepobobby has binders full of candidates.

      Reply
    164. 164.

      Matt McIrvin

      March 2, 2026 at 10:07 am

      @Soprano2: “The Battle Hymn of Lt. Calley” all over again.

      Reply
    165. 165.

      lowtechcyclist

      March 2, 2026 at 10:07 am

      @prostratedragon:

      So: more people we’re hurting because they have had the misfortune to be born in the wrong country.

      Swell. Just swell.

      Reply
    166. 166.

      WTFGhost

      March 2, 2026 at 10:08 am

      @Suzanne: Yeah, it turns out spending two years building support for a really bad idea can turn a nation really bloodthirsty and we still haven’t recovered. You have people who can write that every few years the US should kill a bunch of people in some small country, to show we mean business, or that the whole point of the Iraq was was just to say to the Middle East “suck on this!” which might make sense if Iraq had attacked us, or helped the people who attacked us, but instead we’re saying “suck on us just beating up someone at random!”

      Also, hundreds of thousands of Iraqis died, so sometimes people have to say something something vital American interests, even though all the lies were apparent before the whole thing started.

      Once you realize how much of warfare is fought for stupid reasons, by stupid people, it becomes easier and easier to simply become anti-war.

      Reply
    167. 167.

      Matt McIrvin

      March 2, 2026 at 10:08 am

      @lowtechcyclist: I think that was Tony’s parody of the style.

      Reply
    168. 168.

      schrodingers_cat

      March 2, 2026 at 10:08 am

      @Omnes Omnibus: I have seen bsky and  X posts on how Khamenei loved Jane Austen.

      Reply
    169. 169.

      Miss Bianca

      March 2, 2026 at 10:08 am

      @Omnes Omnibus: THANK YOU. Jesus chicken-fried Christ, to see a bunch of head-nodding here of all places with a “well, ackshually, regime change in Iran is a *good* thing, no matter how it comes about” stance…is a bit crazy-making.

      Must be time to step away from here again…

      Reply
    170. 170.

      trnc

      March 2, 2026 at 10:08 am

      @Scout211: ​
       

      Trump told us he was in control and could end this immediately or maybe in five days.

      I’m surprised he didn’t claim that he’d have it fixed by day 1 of his presidency.

      Reply
    171. 171.

      Old Man Shadow

      March 2, 2026 at 10:09 am

      the gravity of war….

      Do you really think he feels anything? Do you think he loses an ounce of sleep during his day thinking of the dead and wounded? What, in his long history of sociopathy, narcissism, and misanthropy have given you any evidence for assuming he would pause or think or consider before ordering someone’s death or sending troops to their deaths?

      He is not a normal president. Even by the debased standards of modern Republican presidents, he is not normal.

      The man would turn America into a sea of glass and kill all 340 million of us without a second thought if he thought it would gain him something.

      Reply
    172. 172.

      Dave

      March 2, 2026 at 10:10 am

      @Matt McIrvin: Hegseth is what happens when you put an insecure sub-replacement level Major with a chip on his shoulder in a position of actual power.

      I despise him for so many reasons but he in this one area he is genuinely authentic.

      Reply
    173. 173.

      Tony Jay

      March 2, 2026 at 10:10 am

      @lowtechcyclist:

      Job done.

      Reply
    174. 174.

      Suzanne

      March 2, 2026 at 10:10 am

      @Miss Bianca:

      She took an awful lot of words to say, “hey, look – even an illegal, immoral, unethical, and just plain STOOPID act of aggression against another sovereign nation has its up side!” 

      Not to mention….. achieving the up side requires much more competence, international relations knowledge, and humanitarian concern than that exhibited by FFOTUS and Bibi in their political careers thus far. Anyone with basic pattern recognition skills should see that immediately.

      How many times are we gonna destabilize regimes and then be Shocked Pikachus when the results are suboptimal?

      Reply
    175. 175.

      Spanky

      March 2, 2026 at 10:11 am

      @Old Man Shadow:

      Do you really think he feels anything? Do you think he loses an ounce of sleep during his day thinking of the dead and wounded?

      I think it gives him a woody.

      Reply
    176. 176.

      trnc

      March 2, 2026 at 10:11 am

      @Jackie: At the same time, he set off a social media firestorm by promising he would set aside traditional rules of engagement designed to prevent war crimes.

      We might not be able to prosecute Hegseth after a pardon, but nothing can stop the next president from handing him over to Iran to face (ahem) prosecution there.

      Reply
    177. 177.

      Jackie

      March 2, 2026 at 10:11 am

      @Matt McIrvin:

      Hegseth makes Cheney, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz look like a bunch of geniuses.

      And shows FFOTUS as the stupid, clueless idiot we already knew him to be.

      Reply
    178. 178.

      Belafon

      March 2, 2026 at 10:14 am

      @Omnes Omnibus:

      The fact the the government of Iran is awful does not change the fact that this war is illegal under both US and international law.

       
      Someone should explain to Trump that he’s authorized other countries to remove any American leader they don’t like.

      Reply
    179. 179.

      Sure Lurkalot

      March 2, 2026 at 10:14 am

      @Geminid:

      Susan Wiles seems to working with Caine to that end. At least, that’s the impression I got from pictures taken at Mar-a-Loco this weekend.

      Pictures of her in a curtained room at a country club?

      Susan Wiles worked to an end, to get a sundowning narcissist re-elected. A year and a few months in, here we are. That’s how “smart” Susie is.

      Reply
    180. 180.

      WTFGhost

      March 2, 2026 at 10:14 am

      @Miss Bianca: I’m getting a bit of “don’t tell me this has to end in tragedy!” vibe. Plus… what, this is the biggest political event in 50 years (roughly), and it disrupts a nasty system, so maybe.

      I mean, what if someone bombed the SOTU, so a Democratic speaker ascended to the Presidency, (the Rs died in the SOTU) I’m sure there’d be some US expats saying that they hope we’re going to stop invading other nations, and they’re not saying mass political assassination is a good thing, but, maybe there’s hope.

      Reply
    181. 181.

      UncleEbeneezer

      March 2, 2026 at 10:15 am

      @Geminid: Kareen Rifai, who is Syrian, has been mentioning the fact that Iran helped kill five-six THOUSAND of his people and displaced millions, but oddly the progressive stance is that it’s wrong for him to celebrate the toppling of the regime, even though he is very adamantly anti-Trump.  I’ve seen Yemenis, Israelis and Iranians posting similar things about their own stories of friends/family tortured, killed, raped by Iranian proxies or the Iranian regime itself.  Their celebration is completely justified and doesn’t in any way make them Imperialists, MAGA or any less progressive.

      Reply
    182. 182.

      Spanky

      March 2, 2026 at 10:15 am

      Let’s hope that these engagements will become known as The Epstein Wars.

      Reply
    183. 183.

      Miss Bianca

      March 2, 2026 at 10:15 am

      @Suzanne:

      How many times are we gonna destabilize regimes and then be Shocked Pikachus when the results are suboptimal?

      Judging by the history of every foreign regime we’ve ever meddled with since the end of WWII…for a long time to come. Particularly if we as a nation are so stupid as to keep electing Republicans, which we undoubtedly are.

      Reply
    184. 184.

      Betty Cracker

      March 2, 2026 at 10:15 am

      @Geminid: Haven’t read Jacobs’ comments since I quit the Nazi site, so I can’t speak to how she framed Iranian agency directly. But the box Trump-Netanyahu put Iranian civilians in this weekend seems almost customed designed to rob them of agency, i.e., simultaneously saying, “Rejoice, we killed the bad guys, take back your country!” and “Never mind, we’re looking for a new autocrat to deal with who will be more amenable to our grift.”

      Possibly Jacobs has some insight on the situation that I lack, but I’m finding it hard to see this situation as anything other than an incredibly tragic clusterfuck. And it’s one perpetrated by two odious, autocratic crooks who are more interested in clinging to power and staying out of jail than what happens to their own citizens, let alone the citizens of any other country.

      Reply
    185. 185.

      jonas

      March 2, 2026 at 10:16 am

      @Scout211: Yeah, the plan at this point seems to be just to blow enough shit up to decapitate Iran’s leadership, permanently cripple the military, and collapse the economy, thereby turning it into a third-world backwater to the benefit of Israel and the Saudis.

      What could possibly go wrong?

      Reply
    186. 186.

      Geminid

      March 2, 2026 at 10:17 am

      @Miss Bianca: Jacobs took a lot of words to analyse the situation in Iran. That was her focus, and that analyses was worth reading.

      It’s true Jacobs did not condemn this attack in absolute terms, but I don’t see how that disqualifies her opinions. Like it or not, this war is happening and I think it’s right to examine its potential effect on the Iranian people critically.

      Reply
    187. 187.

      trnc

      March 2, 2026 at 10:17 am

      @Jackie: ​
       

      “I don’t know how many times it needs to be said, but rules of engagement are for the safety of our troops as much as they’re for protecting civilian lives. F—— idiot running the joint,” pointed out academic Lee Papa who goes by “Rude Pundit.”

      Hegseth and Trump don’t care. There’s no such thing as an unacceptable number of US military casualties if they think this will benefit them in some way.

      Reply
    188. 188.

      Spanky

      March 2, 2026 at 10:17 am

      @Belafon: And let’s don’t forget that recent wars have evolved new weaponry like drones that are resistant to jamming. I doubt that the WH defenses have kept up.

      Reply
    189. 189.

      prostratedragon

      March 2, 2026 at 10:18 am

      @Matt McIrvin, @trnc,@lowtechcyclist:
      Per the article it looks like they will use a suite of techniques rigorously deveoped on Little St. James Island and at Rancho Zorro, NM, called sexual bullying. The kayfabe version refers to “psychiatry” and “psychtropic drugs.”

      Reply
    190. 190.

      Miss Bianca

      March 2, 2026 at 10:19 am

      @UncleEbeneezer: Fine. Let any actual Iranians feel great about the US bombing the shit out of Iran to get rid of Khameini…in the few days they’ve got to feel great about it before they either get blown up themselves or watch more of their loved ones get blown up in the days to come.

      That doesn’t mean I or anyone else has to feel anything but horrified about it.

      Reply
    191. 191.

      jonas

      March 2, 2026 at 10:19 am

      @Miss Bianca:  Judging by the history of every foreign regime we’ve ever meddled with since the end of WWII…for a long time to come.

      Because from Vietnam to Afghanistan, we didn’t really lose. We were stabbed in the back by DFH’s and the liberal media that caused the country to lose its nerve just as we were on the verge of winning. This time will be different, though!

      Reply
    192. 192.

      LAC

      March 2, 2026 at 10:20 am

      @Miss Bianca: Oh please don’t dip out  I share your disbelief of any propping up viewpoints that act as if this  omnishambles excursion will lead to to anything but a list a future war crimes.  You are not alone on this. The current leadership in this country and Israel will only lead to a vacuum in Iran to be filled by another hard liner.  And this administration is too busy with its propaganda to have any honest assessments of what will happen in Iran to its people

      Reply
    193. 193.

      Matt McIrvin

      March 2, 2026 at 10:20 am

      @schrodingers_cat: There are a lot of dumdums on Bluesky, I saw someone there cheering for American soldier deaths and expressing hope that as many Americans get killed as possible (“they deserve it for taking orders from a child rapist”). It’s gonna happen, it’s not characteristic of anything. Some of them are probably Russian trolls too.

      The thing that occurs to me is, we assassinated a despot who is 86 and probably didn’t have a long time left, in a manner that makes his death obviously martyrdom by enemy action. Is that in any way constructive? Presumably he’s got a succession plan.

      Reply
    194. 194.

      Miss Bianca

      March 2, 2026 at 10:21 am

      @Geminid: you know, we’re going to have to agree to disagree about this. I don’t see Jacobs’s “analysis” as being thoughtful to the degree that you do. I stand by my original analysis of HER analysis.

      Reply
    195. 195.

      jonas

      March 2, 2026 at 10:21 am

      @trnc:   There’s no such thing as an unacceptable number of US military casualties if they think this will benefit them in some way.

      And any troops foolish enough to get killed in one of Dear Leader’s glorious operations were just “losers” anyway who obviously didn’t have what it took to be MAGA.

      Reply
    196. 196.

      Jeffro

      March 2, 2026 at 10:22 am

      @Professor Bigfoot:

      Ain’t it funny how everything this administration does seems to benefit Russia and Putin?  And NOTHING it does ever HARMS Russia or Russian interests?  William of Ockham is screaming.

      Seems like fewer and fewer folks are shaving with that razor these days…sigh…

      As the saying goes, if he were an official, paid Russian asset…what would he be doing any differently?

      Reply
    197. 197.

      schrodingers_cat

      March 2, 2026 at 10:23 am

      @Matt McIrvin: Nothing about this misadventure is constructive. I am going to go and do my work now and leave the discussion for all the middle east experts on here.

      Last word on Magi Jay she is thoughtful no matter what the topic. She is a nuanced thinker than many here who think they know everything about everything. Even when I don’t agree with her, she is worth reading.

      Reply
    198. 198.

      ArchTeryx

      March 2, 2026 at 10:23 am

      @Baud: Where is M’nemaxa when you need him? We sure could use an Eldritch entity like him again, mister.

      Reply
    199. 199.

      Deputinize America

      March 2, 2026 at 10:27 am

      @lowtechcyclist:

      Of course, every Shahed that lands on a luxury block in Dubai or a military airfield in Kuwait or Doha, or a freighter in the Gulf, or a US naval base in Bahrain or a financial center in the UAE is a Shahed that can’t be bought by Putin and used on Ukraine.

      Reply
    200. 200.

      Suzanne

      March 2, 2026 at 10:27 am

      @Betty Cracker:

      I’m finding it hard to see this situation as anything other than an incredibly tragic clusterfuck. And it’s one perpetrated by two odious, autocratic crooks who are more interested in clinging to power and staying out of jail than what happens to their own citizens, let alone the citizens of any other country. 

      Yeah, thank you. The Iranian regime was terrible, and destabilizing it without a solid, legal, effective strategy to replace it with something better….. is a monstrous thing to do. It exposes the Iranian people to even greater risk.

      That’s why I find this idea that one can sit back and “analyze” the justification for this war separately from any strategy for success to be the worst kind of seeing-people-as-things pseudo-intellectualism possible. Those are people’s lives we’re playing with.

      Reply
    201. 201.

      PatD

      March 2, 2026 at 10:27 am

      I’m fairly sympathetic to diaspora peoples who are forced to flee repressive, murderous authoritarian governments. That includes Persians, Cubans, Palestinians etc. They won’t always vote the right way but you can understand their worldview and motivations, to a degree.

      So it’s perfectly understandable why some would cheer on this war and the killings of some truly evil people. That doesn’t make this war any less illegal and unconstitutional.

      Reply
    202. 202.

      lowtechcyclist

      March 2, 2026 at 10:29 am

      @prostratedragon:

      This makes me so angry. There really is no bottom to their evil.

      Reply
    203. 203.

      Omnes Omnibus

      March 2, 2026 at 10:30 am

      @UncleEbeneezer: I didn’t want my country to start an illegal war in 2003.  I didn’t want it to start one now.  A policy of decapitation of disfavored rulers is also bad for international stability.  Who’s next?  Who decides?  If the Iran, the Middle East, and the world end up in a better place, it will be despite what the US and Israel did not because of it.

      Reply
    204. 204.

      Matt McIrvin

      March 2, 2026 at 10:34 am

      @WTFGhost: Nothing HAS to end in tragedy, and I hope it doesn’t. But there are intelligent actions and there are dumbshit actions.

      I think some people out there are falling into the trap I did in 2001-03, getting caught up in the nuts and bolts of the news, paying attention to the actors who seemed most rational and looking for any crumbs of hope in the mess, to the point that I eventually ended up weakly assenting to some shit that was very bad. I am OUT of that game. I know a bunch of people personally affected by this one. The people at the top running it are way dumber even than Bush’s crowd. There’s nothing good about it.

      Reply
    205. 205.

      YY_Sima Qian

      March 2, 2026 at 10:34 am

      @UncleEbeneezer: Whether the Islamic regime falling (still a highly uncertain prospect) is a net good (for Iran or the region) depends entirely on the aftermath following that fall, as we have seen in Iraq, Egypt, Yemen, Tunisia & Libya. Did the ME region become safer & more stable after the fall of Saddam? Was Israel’s strategic position improved by Saddam’s fall? Did the Sahel become more stable after Qaddafi’s fall?

      The fall of the Islamic regime can be a net good, but little of what Trump or Bibi are doing is conducive toward that possibility.

      This particular intervention is indefensible because Israel & the US attacked w/o provocation or imminent threat, in the middle of negotiations where Israel at least was not likely acting in good faith, where the US reps did not know what they were doing or how to parlay w/ the Iranians, & immediately proceeded to assassinate the leadership of the adversary nation. All of these actions would once have been considered the pale. It is precisely because the IRI & the DPRK engaged in some of the such activities that they earned the reputation of being destabilizing & threatening rogues.

      Put it another way, through his reckless & bloodthirsty militarism across the region, his complete disregard for international law & laws on armed conflict in waging such wars, all to save his side from prosecution, Bibi has shown himself to be a deeply destabilizing & threatening actor, arguably even more than the IRI from 2024 on (especially after the “Axis of Resistance” was reduced to shambles in 2025). Would you entertain a defense of a rival power assassination Bibi via the means of unprovoked attack on Israel? There is plenty of domestic opposition to Bibi, too, that would not mourn his passing.

      Reply
    206. 206.

      Miss Bianca

      March 2, 2026 at 10:34 am

      @Suzanne:

      That’s why I find this idea that one can sit back and “analyze” the justification for this war separately from any strategy for success to be the worst kind of seeing-people-as-things pseudo-intellectualism possible. Those are people’s lives we’re playing with.

      Hard agree. And even with a “strategy for success”, seems to me it ought to be *up to the Iranian people* to decide where, how, and when “regime change” happens in their country. Not the US. Not Israel. Not Saudi Arabia.

      ETA: I mean, put it this way. If some foreign actors decided that “regime change” had to happen in the US because of our actions, and took out Trump at Mar-a-Lago, would I be happy that Trump was dead? Yeah, probably I’d cheer. Would I delude myself that this was automatically going to make things better for me or anyone else here? No, I wouldn’t.

      And I would feel insulted as shit reading any foreign analysis that came with a chin-stroking, “well, let’s look at the history of the American people to see whether any fears about their ability to form a democratic government in the aftermath are justified before we rush to judgment about this act.”

      Reply
    207. 207.

      Dave

      March 2, 2026 at 10:35 am

      @PatD: I can and do but this is also why “expat that fled country X supports this action” carries zero weight with me.

      Reply
    208. 208.

      gene108

      March 2, 2026 at 10:37 am

      @Miss Bianca:

      Judging by the history of every foreign regime we’ve ever meddled with since the end of WWII…

      South Korea did well after our meddling.

      Reply
    209. 209.

      cmorenc

      March 2, 2026 at 10:37 am

      @trnc: The whole idea of the actual selection of US Presidents being done via an electoral college, rather than by popular vote – and the selection of electors determined by state legislatures dominated at the time by the elites of the respective states – was precisely to place effective control over presidential selection to the more knowledgeable elites of the country.

      Reply
    210. 210.

      Omnes Omnibus

      March 2, 2026 at 10:40 am

      BTW this little war doesn’t even have the fig leaves of legality that W put in place in 2003.  This isn’t something that we should gloss over.

      Reply
    211. 211.

      Omnes Omnibus

      March 2, 2026 at 10:41 am

      @Dave: Exactly.

      Reply
    212. 212.

      Deputinize America

      March 2, 2026 at 10:42 am

      @Dave:

      World is full of failed O4s who shouldn’t even get close to O5.

      Reply
    213. 213.

      Geminid

      March 2, 2026 at 10:43 am

      @Betty Cracker: I wouldn’t say Jacobs has some special insight into situation. I would not dismiss her observations out of hand though. She has spent a lot of time the last couple months listening to Iranians both inside the country and out, and that informs her opinions. I have not put as much time following Iranian voices, but what I’ve seen is consistent with Jacobs’ analysis.

      As to the question of agency, the principal reason Iranians don’t have much is a government willing to mow them down with machine guns, and execute the survivors when they arrive at the hospitals.

      That happened last month, and I think it’s a big reason the Iranian regime has such gotten such little international support, even from Russia and China. Authoritarians know that when a regime has to massacre tens of thousands of its own citizens in order to survive, it’s not viable long-term.

      Some people worry that the Iranians will end up worse off if the Islamic Republic falls, but I sure don’t. There is also a belief that this operation cannot possibly bring about the fall of the regime, but I think that could be projecting our own political imperatives onto the situation.

      I’m keeping an open mind on the prospect myself. That’s one reason I’m paying closer attention now to regional sites like Rudaw English and (Turkish) TYT International. They watch these events closely because they’re happening right next door, and they aren’t burdened by the preconceptions many Americans have regarding this war.

      Reply
    214. 214.

      Omnes Omnibus

      March 2, 2026 at 10:45 am

      @Dave:  IMO he actually has the mindset of the shittiest company-level commander you can imagine.

      Reply
    215. 215.

      Deputinize America

      March 2, 2026 at 10:46 am

      Power vacuums in large states are dangerous and best avoided.

      Reply
    216. 216.

      cmorenc

      March 2, 2026 at 10:46 am

      @Matt McIrvin: Bush jr’s crowd did at least have a coherent, thought out plan on paper for their mideast adventure, which failed because the assumed premises for their plans were so catastrophically wrong (for just one of a multitude of wrong assumptions, that Chalabi was well-positioned to successfully take over Iraq after Saddam was forcefully deposed).  And that wasn’t even the most wrong element in their assumptions.  But at least they had a coherent plan, albeit one riddled with fatally bad assumptions.

      Reply
    217. 217.

      PatD

      March 2, 2026 at 10:47 am

      @Dave: Yes, it doesn’t change the fact that this war is illegal and unconstitutional. I think it’s immoral too since they could vote to approve this war and do it in all the right ways and I’d still oppose it.

      Reply
    218. 218.

      Deputinize America

      March 2, 2026 at 10:47 am

      @Omnes Omnibus:

      The mind and morals of Lt William Calley comes to mind.

      Reply
    219. 219.

      Gloria DryGarden

      March 2, 2026 at 10:50 am

      @PatD: a lot of the ones forced to flee are the lucky ones, who have means.

      Reply
    220. 220.

      YY_Sima Qian

      March 2, 2026 at 10:50 am

      Also, we have just seen how Trump operates w/ the illegal Venezuela adventure. He kidnapped Maduro & removed a dictator, but then he left the Chavista regime in place in its entirety. No relief to the Venezuelans. He got what he wanted from the illegal adventure, though: control of Venezuela’s oil exports, ensuring the US (& likely himself & his associates) getting a cut.

      His interest in Gaza is transforming it into a gaudy beach resort, built on top of the ruins & corpses of Gazans, w/ the remaining Gazans either the exploited menial labor or expelled altogether, so that he & his real estate buddies can make bank.

      What makes anyone think Trump (& Bibi) are going to effect a net positive outcome in Iran? Of course, Reza Pahlavi is already stroking Trump w/ the promise of US$ 1T worth of wealth extraction for US interests if Trump can topple the Islamist regime (& presumably installing Reza Pahlavi to fill the vacuum).

      Reply
    221. 221.

      Jackie

      March 2, 2026 at 10:54 am

      @trnc:

      There’s no such thing as an unacceptable number of US military casualties if they think this will benefit them in some way.

      A niggling inconvenience for those who “knew what they signed up for.”

      Reply
    222. 222.

      japa21

      March 2, 2026 at 11:02 am

      One of the main criticisms of anarchists is that they just want to destroy without any plans for afterwards.  This war is along the same lines.

      Yes, it is illegal.

      Yes, it is unprovoked.

      Yes, the leadership of Iran is/was very, very bad.

      But most of all, this move by Trump was just plain stupid.

      Reply
    223. 223.

      PatD

      March 2, 2026 at 11:04 am

      @Gloria DryGarden: Yes. But not always. See the ‘boat people’.

      Reply
    224. 224.

      Paul in KY

      March 2, 2026 at 11:05 am

      @p.a.: It worked in ‘Catch 22’ (bombing yourself and good things happening).

      Reply
    225. 225.

      Scout211

      March 2, 2026 at 11:05 am

      @japa21: But most of all, this move by Trump was just plain stupid.

      But he and Jared will profit. Check. Mate.

      Reply
    226. 226.

      Paul in KY

      March 2, 2026 at 11:06 am

      @schrodingers_cat: That sounds logical, unfortunately.

      Reply
    227. 227.

      Paul in KY

      March 2, 2026 at 11:07 am

      @Suzanne: Must need more ‘likes’ and ‘content’.

      Reply
    228. 228.

      Fair Economist

      March 2, 2026 at 11:08 am

      @Betty Cracker:

      Well, which is it, motherfucker?

       Sure sounds like he went into this without a coherent plan and is in reaction mode. Not ideal!
      We’re dealing with Donny Dementia here. He can’t make a coherent plan and if somebody gives him one he can’t remember it.

      Reply
    229. 229.

      YY_Sima Qian

      March 2, 2026 at 11:08 am

      In other news, Qatar Energy just announced a halt to LNGs production due to Iranian drones striking its facilities. Qatar accounts for 20% of the word’s LNG production.

      Gas prices are soaring in Europe, & Japan/South Korea/Taiwan will get hammered, too. Qatar is the top supplier of LNG to the PRC, as well, but at least it has the cheap Russian gas as an option. We may see the agreement for the Power of Siberia II pipeline from Russia to the PRC closed, after all. The PRC is sure to redouble its efforts to extract the domestic shale gas, although in much more challenging geographies compared to the US. PRC shale gas is more expensive than US shale gas, but nevertheless is ~ 25% cheaper than the piped Russian gas (already purchased at steep discount), & far cheaper than imported LNG. “Green” hydrogen & ammonia produced at scale by solar/wind power is more of a medium term prospect.

      Fortunately for the PRC, it is not very reliant on gas for power generation (it uses coal, solar, hydro, wind, nuclear & biomass), more for heating & chemical precursors. Taiwan, OTOH, is highly reliant on gas fired power generation, having shut down its nuclear reactors, & it only has 14 days of reserves (a mass vulnerability in the event of a PRC blockade).

      Europe & Japan/SK/TW will be among the most hurt in the event of prolonged war around the Persian Gulf, at least for countries outside of the region.

      Reply
    230. 230.

      Paul in KY

      March 2, 2026 at 11:10 am

      @cmorenc: Nor have I ever heard of her.

      Reply
    231. 231.

      Dave

      March 2, 2026 at 11:10 am

      @Omnes Omnibus: Very much so. It’s fractal. He really was almost vat grown to be “that fucking guy”.

      Reply
    232. 232.

      YY_Sima Qian

      March 2, 2026 at 11:11 am

      @Fair Economist: I posted the below in a previous thread:

      Gregg Carlstrom @glcarlstrom

      Trump is basically calling up every journalist in his phone to workshop different timelines and goals for his war. In the past two days:

      @washingtonpost: the aim is “freedom for the people” of Iran
      @axios: maybe we can “end it in two or three days” with a deal
      @nytimes: might be “four to five weeks”, I have “three very good choices” who might take control in Iran
      @abc: actually, nevermind, we killed those choices

      He doesn’t sound convinced by any of it. He’s throwing spaghetti at the wall. Ultimately I suspect he just wants to say he “solved” a problem that has vexed every American president since Jimmy Carter.

      But there’s no clear idea what that looks like and no plan for how to get there. And there are plenty of possible scenarios in which Trump declares victory and leaves the region with an absolute mess

      Laura Rozen @lrozen

      “When pressed on his plans for a transition of power, Mr. Trump said he hoped Iran’s elite military forces…would simply turn over their weapons to the Iranian populace.” It would be funny if this guy had not gotten the United States into a new war in the Middle East with no clue what he’s doing

      GL https://nytimes.com/2026/03/01/us/politics/trump-iran-war-interview.html?unlocked_article_code=1.QFA.-nmk.IIbLhtBAQSkR&smid=url-share

      Reply
    233. 233.

      Paul in KY

      March 2, 2026 at 11:13 am

      @Spanky: I would hope that it would be a bit more competent than having Cheetolini actually running it.

      Reply
    234. 234.

      Paul in KY

      March 2, 2026 at 11:13 am

      @WTFGhost: Plus a few rifles and such floating around in the good ole USA…

      Reply
    235. 235.

      Sure Lurkalot

      March 2, 2026 at 11:16 am

      Thread eerily reminiscent of Bush and his axis of evil…maybe it’s time for a new PNAC. Bill Kristol is still around and on the “good” side now, I’m sure he’d help get the gang together.

      Pay no attention to the people here who have been arrested, deported to 3rd world prisons, currently imprisoned in warehouses, with no due process, the majority of whom had no criminal record other than the misdemeanor of living, working a d paying taxes in America without papers.

      In “charge” of our foreign “policy” is a Russian tool whose main goal for his presidency is to unjustly enrich himself and his “diplomats”, a son-in-law in service to middle eastern despots and a real estate developer, all in for the Benjamins.

      Reply
    236. 236.

      WaterGirl

      March 2, 2026 at 11:50 am

      @Miss Bianca: Please don’t step away.  Stay, and call that out when you see it.

      Friends tell you when you’re fucking up.  They just don’t attack you for it.

      Reply
    237. 237.

      WaterGirl

      March 2, 2026 at 11:51 am

      @Sure Lurkalot: Preach!

      Say it again louder, for the cheap seats.

      Reply
    238. 238.

      Gloria DryGarden

      March 2, 2026 at 11:54 am

      @PatD: no of course, and asylum seekers, folks getting here from refugee camps.

      Reply
    239. 239.

      Gloria DryGarden

      March 2, 2026 at 11:59 am

      @Sure Lurkalot: devastating, I appreciate your summary.

      grr

      Reply
    240. 240.

      Paul in KY

      March 2, 2026 at 12:12 pm

      @Dave: Very true. He knows he’s waaaaaay out of his league and that the Generals look at him with complete disdain.

      Reply
    241. 241.

      Paul in KY

      March 2, 2026 at 12:31 pm

      @cmorenc: One of the problems with that ‘safeguard’ is that it never was accomplished (elite electors overturn election of a complete shitheel) and then after many years of it never happening, it becomes unthinkable.

      Reply
    242. 242.

      Paul in KY

      March 2, 2026 at 12:33 pm

      @Omnes Omnibus: Makes Captain Queeg seem like a level headed professional.

      Reply
    243. 243.

      Geminid

      March 2, 2026 at 12:35 pm

      @Miss Bianca: The vast majority of people here agree with you on this issue. I don’t know why it’s so challenging to hear minority voices. This place isn’t isn’t a monoculture and it never will be.

      Reply
    244. 244.

      Miss Bianca

      March 2, 2026 at 12:55 pm

      @Geminid: And I honestly don’t get where you’re coming from. So again, a hypothetical: if the Iranian military took out Trump and Co, would you be sitting here talking about how much unappreciated wisdom there was in any Iranian commenters who opined about how many Americans wanted regime change, anyway, so “this is supposed to be a ‘appy occasion, let’s not bicker and  argue over ‘oo killed ‘oo”?

      I mean, if you say, “yeah”, that would at least be ideologically consistent.

      Reply
    245. 245.

      Omnes Omnibus

      March 2, 2026 at 12:58 pm

      @Dave:  Yes, he is “that fucking guy” at multiple levels.

      Reply
    246. 246.

      artem1s

      March 2, 2026 at 1:04 pm

      @RevRick: ​ 

      The Iranian regime was monstrous, but we aren’t the world’s dictator.

      If the US was bombing based on who was most monstrous we’d be bombing the monster in Riyadh not Tehran.

      Reply
    247. 247.

      LAC

      March 2, 2026 at 1:06 pm

      @Miss Bianca: i see somebody watched “Monty python and the holy grail”  Great scene  😉

      Reply
    248. 248.

      Geminid

      March 2, 2026 at 1:19 pm

      @Miss Bianca: I would say, No.

      But I have never claimed to be an ideologically consistent person because I’m not much for ideology to begin with.

      Anyway, your hypothetical is not well-founded. Trump did not slaughter tens of thousands of his own citizens last month, and the Iranian regime did.

      Reply
    249. 249.

      Trivia Man

      March 2, 2026 at 1:31 pm

      @WTFGhost: The point being that passing  “dont do that” gives him tons of wiggle room to say “i am not doing whatever that specific thing is so it doesn’t apply here”.
      An approval resolution is much harder to ignore. IMHO

      Reply
    250. 250.

      O. Felix Culpa

      March 2, 2026 at 1:39 pm

      @Suzanne: No, that is not at all what she is saying. Good Lord.

      Reply
    251. 251.

      Ruckus

      March 2, 2026 at 1:45 pm

      @lowtechcyclist:

      Major brand gas station just down the street and gas is $4.80/gallon. Pretty glad I rarely drive any more.

      Reply
    252. 252.

      Ruckus

      March 2, 2026 at 1:49 pm

      @jonas:

      What could possibly go wrong?

      Every damn thing?

      Or is it just EVERYTHING?

      Reply
    253. 253.

      Marc

      March 2, 2026 at 2:20 pm

      @Geminid:  Some people worry that the Iranians will end up worse off if the Islamic Republic falls, but I sure don’t. There is also a belief that this operation cannot possibly bring about the fall of the regime, but I think that could be projecting our own political imperatives onto the situation.

      I’m sorry man, that is pure comedy gold!  It may well bring about the fall of the current regimes (just like the Chjavistas fell :). Show me a single example of a non-occupying aggressor decapitating a government, destroying most military equipment, still leaving millions of guns in the hands of the military, paramilitaries, and police, then the people rise up and magically form a warm peaceful loving democratic society.

      This is only about trading one set of clerics for potentially more compliant warlords.  Do remember what happened the first time Iranians elected the government of their actual choice.

      Reply
    254. 254.

      Geminid

      March 2, 2026 at 2:25 pm

      @Marc: You can laugh at me if you want, I don’t care.

      Reply
    255. 255.

      glc

      March 2, 2026 at 2:27 pm

      @jonas: That’s understandable. It’s well within the realm of plausibility. I wouldn’t react as strongly as you as it seems like a question of how fast that particular corpse is decaying.

      I actually know some people who are assisting in that process. They seem to think WaPo + AI = money, but I haven’t caught the details and I have some doubts. It’s worked for Forbes though; they make most of their money from SEO to AI slop about consumer goods and health and run the news portion to keep the SEO functioning.  I assume WaPo will be trying for something like that, but with more sophisticated tech involved.

      Reply
    256. 256.

      Omnes Omnibus

      March 2, 2026 at 2:30 pm

      I am hearing echoes of the liberal interventionists who supported W great adventure.  While I have interventionist sympathies, I want thing done the correct way under UN auspices with a viable plan for success.  This has less of any of that than the Iraq invasion did.

      Reply
    257. 257.

      whca

      March 2, 2026 at 2:41 pm

      @artem1s: If the US was bombing based on who was most monstrous we’d be bombing the monster in Riyadh not Tehran.

      This.

      Reply
    258. 258.

      Martin

      March 2, 2026 at 3:27 pm

      @rikyrah: It’s an old program. Mamdani only brought attention to it, and more importantly the attention he brought indicated we should be proud of that program, and that it was the best way to solve the problem. That’s in contrast to how too many Democrats treat government services, which is sort of a necessary evil, and not really something to be proud of. It’s hard to get voters to support these things when the lawmakers don’t seem to believe they’ve built the best solution to a problem.

      Reply
    259. 259.

      Bill Arnold

      March 2, 2026 at 3:37 pm

      @jonas:

      Project 2025 attempts to prove evangelical Christianity and its perceptions of gender norms is correct

      I expect that none of these folks can properly answer the question “what is the gender of God?” properly,

      ( Gender of God, wikipedia, is an OK start, with references.)

      Reply
    260. 260.

      Bill Arnold

      March 2, 2026 at 3:49 pm

      @Omnes Omnibus:
      The normalization of political assassination as a tool of … statecraft by other means … is particularly bad.
      Netanyahu in particular has form here, possibly dating back to the 1990s (Rabin).
      The Israelis are far far too comfortable with political assassination as a tool.

      Reply
    261. 261.

      Bill Arnold

      March 2, 2026 at 4:22 pm

      @jonas:

      What could possibly go wrong?

      Small workshops making semi-submersible drones using the Ukrainian “Sea Baby” (and similar) as inspiration. [1]
      One or more oil tankers and/or container ships sinking.
      The “etc” probably involves boots on the ground.

      [1] That’s assuming that the IRGC has not already built and stockpiled such weapons. (Military planners must assume worst case.)

      Reply
    262. 262.

      Omnes Omnibus

      March 2, 2026 at 4:49 pm

      @Bill Arnold: I absolutely agree.

      Reply
    263. 263.

      dnfree

      March 2, 2026 at 4:58 pm

      @cmorenc: No, GW Bush and company did NOT have a well-thought-out plan for Iraq.  James Fallows wrote a memorable article called “Blind into Baghdad” about their failure to have a plan.  And the people Bush sent in to implement the new regime were ideologues with little or no experience, even people fresh out of college.  The decision to disband the military is widely regarded as disastrous, and it was made with little analysis of the consequences.

      Reply
    264. 264.

      sab

      March 2, 2026 at 7:50 pm

      I am so phucking glad that I had to spend the day preparing other peoples tax returns instead of being on line.

      Not hearing much about the big stinky bill, except folks with lots of qualified overtime are very happy. Tips not so much because tip people have never declared what came in cash.

      I always tip in cash not on my credit card. Although they are shafting their own Social Security, but that is their choice.

      Stepson had substantial overtime in his last job. Girl friend had already filed for him.

      I told him he had three years to amend, and amending obvious stuff is not a big deal.

      We might amend for a residential energy credit.

      When we moved into our new to us house we had to reolace the air conditioner and the boiler. Either would qualify. I was too fried last year to bother. But I have three years to polish up my taxes.

      Reply
    265. 265.

      Kayla Rudbek

      March 2, 2026 at 7:59 pm

      @Bill Arnold: I don’t remember where I read this: the assertion that “God created man in his own image and likeness” is a time bomb ticking in the heart of Christianity.

      (not sure why it’s not true for all the Abrahamic religions, though Judaism could probably argue it away)

      Reply
    266. 266.

      Lyrebird

      March 2, 2026 at 9:19 pm

      @schrodingers_cat: ​
       
      Thanks for putting the quote & the Gov. Shapiro statement here.

      Both are thoughtful. All I can see is that the malevolent yam is yet again showing his ability to take a bad situation and make it worse. It would be amazing if the Iranian people end up more free and not more caught. (As you totally know) strongmen find having an external attacker so useful in selling their own repression that they sometimes make that stuff up. I am also pretty confident that Trump and friends just made every American less safe for the next decade at least.

      Great move while we have a self-absorbed idiot heading the FBI, and someone even worse heading the DOD.

      Reply
    267. 267.

      Gloria DryGarden

      March 3, 2026 at 12:58 am

      @mappy!: Ana del Castillo, I think she’s on the View, is Cuban. She has posted a statement about what has ensued in Cuba after our adventure in Venezuela. It sounds like it’s been pretty devastating there. Without the fuel they were getting from V, Cuba can’t refrigerate perishable foods that arrive, not can they transport them. For starters.

      Reply

    Leave a Comment

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    If you don't see both the Visual and the Text tab on the editor, click here to refresh.

    Clear Comment

    To reply to more than one person, click the X to save & close the box.

    Primary Sidebar

    On The Road - evap - Myanmar, December 2016, Part 1 1
    Photo by eval (3/12/26)

    Election Resources

    Voter Registration Info – Find a State
    Check Voter Registration by Address
    Election Calendar by State

    Targeted Fundraising Info & Links

    Recent Comments

    • comrade scotts agenda of rage on Fundraising Efforts – Part 2: The Senate (Mar 12, 2026 @ 7:33pm)
    • comrade scotts agenda of rage on Fundraising Efforts – Part 2: The Senate (Mar 12, 2026 @ 7:31pm)
    • Geminid on Foreign Sports Affairs Open Thread: “Not Possible” (Mar 12, 2026 @ 7:30pm)
    • Martin on Foreign Sports Affairs Open Thread: “Not Possible” (Mar 12, 2026 @ 7:29pm)
    • frosty on Fundraising Efforts – Part 2: The Senate (Mar 12, 2026 @ 7:26pm)

    Balloon Juice Posts

    View by Topic
    View by Author
    View by Month & Year
    View by Past Author

    Featuring

    Medium Cool
    Artists in Our Midst
    Authors in Our Midst
    On Artificial Intelligence (7-part series)

    🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

    Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
    Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

    Calling All Jackals

    Site Feedback
    Nominate a Rotating Tag
    Submit Photos to On the Road
    Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
    Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

    Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

    Outsmarting Apple iOS 26

    Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

    Order Calendar A
    Order Calendar B

    Social Media

    Balloon Juice
    WaterGirl
    TaMara
    John Cole
    DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
    Betty Cracker
    Tom Levenson
    David Anderson
    Major Major Major Major
    DougJ NYT Pitchbot
    mistermix
    Rose Judson (podcast)

    Site Footer

    Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

    • Facebook
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Comment Policy
    • Our Authors
    • Blogroll
    • Our Artists
    • Privacy Policy

    Privacy Manager

    Copyright © 2026 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

    Insert/edit link

    Enter the destination URL

    Or link to existing content

      No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.
        Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

        Email sent!