Justice

Two *longer reads to recommend, unless you have already read them.

Joyce Vance talks about the inadvertent release of materials related to the Jack Smith investigation, and Jamie Raskin writes a letter as ranking member of the Judiciary Committee.

Joyce Vance article

Jamie Raskin’s letter

*My idea of what I consider “long” has sadly been downgraded (upgraded?) because we are all being trained to have the attention span of a gnat.  Neither of those is long by the previous standard!

For an administration that is as evil as it is ruthless, and surely competent at the part that involves evil, I am at least grateful for the incompetence they display – which I believe they are displaying more and more.

Judge Cannon forbade the release of Jack Smith’s special report.  Oops, White House releases a key document!

Judge Aileen Cannon forbade it. There would be no release of Volume II of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report, the part that dealt with the discovery that Donald Trump kept classified documents, some at the Top Secret/SCI level, when he left the White House. When Smith testified before Congress, he carefully tailored his responses to avoid violating the court’s order.

But not so much the Trump White House. In what appears to be a sloppy but serious error, the administration released a document to Congress that MSNOW’s Carol Leonnig and Jacqueline Alemany reported on yesterday. They write, “In a January 2023 ‘progress memo’ reviewed by MS NOW, Smith’s office discussed the possible motive after the FBI discovered that Trump held on to many documents related to his businesses.” Although the document isn’t publicly available, it sounds like the sort of reports agents and/or prosecutors might prepare for supervisors. This one contains some fascinating details.

The document was released as part of a regular document production DOJ has been making to Congress in support of the Republican inquiry into Smith. House Judiciary Democrats put it like this: “This particular production contained a memorandum detailing non-public information about the classified documents Trump stole when leaving office. The newly produced materials offer a startling view of evidence gathered by Special Counsel Jack Smith during his investigations into the criminal activity of President Trump, even as DOJ continues to suppress Volume II of his final report.”

First, is the hint at motive. Why did Trump do something so obviously criminal, and not do it particularly well? Why did he lie to DOJ officials when asked to return classified material they had learned was still in his possession? What was so important to the former president?

Jamie Raskin’s letter to the Attorney General

Representative Jamie Raskin, the ranking Democratic member of the House Judiciary Committee, slipped another interesting detail into a letter he wrote to AG Pam Bondi. “These new disclosures suggest that Donald Trump stole documents so sensitive that only six people in the entire U.S. government had access to them.” That suggests a document of extraordinary sensitivity.

How did the memo come to light? Raskin explained it like this in the letter to Bondi: “Apparently blinded by the frenzied search to find any scrap of evidence that could be twisted and distorted to level an attack against Special Counsel Smith (despite constantly coming up empty-handed), you have, quite amazingly, missed the fact that some of the documents you provided include damning evidence about your boss’s conduct and may well violate the gag order your DOJ and Donald Trump demanded from Judge Aileen Cannon.”

The reporting so far doesn’t reveal precisely which Trump business interests are involved, but Raskin engages in some educated speculation in the letter, which involves a classified map Trump had. “Without access to Volume II of the Special Counsel’s final report or the investigative files, we do not know what that classified map contained, nor can we determine from this memo the relationship between the classified documents President Trump stole and their pertinence to his ‘business interests,’” Raskin acknowledged. He continued, however, “We do know that around the time of this flight to Bedminster, President Trump was entering into partnerships with Saudi-backed LIV Golf and state-linked real estate firm Dar al Arkan.”

Jamie Raskin’s conclusion in his letter to the AG

Raskin’s conclusion is stark because of what is going on today, years later. “If this map is related to our military posture in the Middle East,” he writes to Bondi, “and it was in fact shown to any foreign official, Saudi or otherwise, that would amount to an unforgiveable betrayal of our men and women in uniform who are currently valiantly fighting in President Trump’s disastrous war against Iran.” Raskin includes a list of questions for DOJ to respond to and demands that DOJ “cease cherry-picking investigative materials and produce all remaining investigative files, including memoranda, emails, and analyses prepared by the Special Counsel’s Office by 5:00 p.m. on April 14, 2026.” I suspect he’ll have even less luck with that than Congress has had obtaining the full Epstein files. But as with those files, public awareness and outcry is essential.

DOJ mistaked its way into providing information it has been desperate to withhold and has been able to keep from public view so far, with Judge Cannon’s help. But her decision is on appeal and a panel at the 11th Circuit will hear oral argument in June. That court could order the release of Volume II of the Special Counsel’s report and complete our understanding of the picture that is only hinted at here.

This one letter that has come to light reminds us that Jack Smith had a serious prosecution that was derailed, and not because it lacked merit. Recent reporting suggests that the Saudi’s continue to push the war in Iran. We have the implications of Raskin’s letter at hand. American lives are at stake in the Middle East, fighting a war that appears poorly thought out at best and likely to seriously impact the economy. The classified documents case, which Trump tried to dismiss and then delay, ultimately succeeding, reemerges as an extraordinarily serious matter.

I cannot wait until it all comes out.  Which it will.  Eventually.  Hopefully sooner than later.

Joyce Vance: An Inadvertent ReleasePost + Comments (30)