• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Lick the third rail, it tastes like chocolate!

This blog will pay for itself.

No one could have predicted…

Shallow, uninformed, and lacking identity

Black Jesus loves a paper trail.

A snarling mass of vitriolic jackals

There are more Russians standing up to Putin than Republicans.

Welcome to day five of every-bit-as-bad-as-you-thought-it-would-be.

America is going up in flames. The NYTimes fawns over MAGA celebrities. No longer a real newspaper.

There are no moderate republicans – only extremists and cowards.

You’re just a puppy masquerading as an old coot.

Republicans cannot even be trusted with their own money.

Republican also-rans: four mules fighting over a turnip.

If rights aren’t universal, they are privilege, not rights.

There are a lot more evil idiots than evil geniuses.

Trump should be leading, not lying.

When you’re a Republican, they let you do it.

It’s all just conspiracy shit beamed down from the mothership.

Well, whatever it is, it’s better than being a Republican.

The desire to stay informed is directly at odds with the need to not be constantly enraged.

Roe is not about choice. It is about freedom.

Hey Washington Post, “Democracy Dies in Darkness” was supposed to be a warning, not a mission statement.

Never give a known liar the benefit of the doubt.

When someone says they “love freedom”, rest assured they don’t mean yours.

Mobile Menu

  • 2026 Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2026 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Archives for Justice / Women's Rights

Women's Rights

Excellent Read: “You Can Never Let Them Think They Have A Chance”

by Anne Laurie|  April 19, 20264:52 pm| 41 Comments

This post is in: Excellent Links, Media, Sports, Women's Rights Are Human Rights

I wrote about Dianna Russini, the constant pressure female reporters face to prove they aren't sleeping with sources (plus the pressure we do get from sources to get involved with them), and why all of this is so uncomfortable to talk about.
Gift link:

[image or embed]

— Diana Moskovitz (@dianamoskovitz.bsky.social) April 15, 2026 at 3:25 PM

I don’t remember the first time someone hit on me as a reporter. I believe this is because my brain has come to treat these events as unremarkable. For any woman in journalism, they pile up over the years. What I can recall are the worst examples. Like the guy my friends nicknamed Mr. Creepy.

We called him Mr. Creepy (I have changed his nickname somewhat to make it less identifying, but it did include the word “creepy”) because he constantly asked me out for drinks. He could do this because he was one of the officials on my beat—covering several small cities for the Miami Herald, a typical job for an early-career reporter—and “asking a young reporter out for drinks over and over, no matter how many times she says no, even though you’re married, and she can’t choose not to be around you” wasn’t against any city code. It did, however, run against the code of journalists: the very good and obvious rule that getting romantically involved with sources, or even appearing to, is off limits.

I don’t recall saying anything to any of my supervisors at the time about it. Even if I had told someone, there was nothing the paper could do about it. They had no control over him. If anything, saying something would get me moved off my beat, possibly onto one I did not want, and potentially flagged as a complainer. Every other female reporter dealt with it, right? So I dealt with it too.

This was the first thing that came to my mind when longtime NFL reporter turned insider (and there is a vast difference between those two jobs) Dianna Russini was first caught in photos, published by Page Six, looking, shall we say, cozy at an Arizona luxury resort with New England Patriots head coach Mike Vrabel. With her employer, The Athletic, still investigating, Russini announced on Tuesday that she is resigning with a few months left on her contract…

To be a woman who does reporting in any field, especially one dominated by men, is to put up with a lot of propositions and harassment and unfairness that your newsroom will be unable to do much about. You also must put up with a lot of people assuming you sleep with your sources because they think that this is the only way you as a female reporter can get any information. Despite all of this, you know there is a line you cannot cross. In part, it’s because, journalistically, it is just wrong. But it’s also about self-preservation.

Every time a woman is found to be credibly sleeping with a source—or, in the case of Russini, seen in a position that suggests she might be—the man hardly ever pays. There is no torrent of calls for Vrabel to be fired. But the woman? She always pays.

show full post on front page

*****
Russini stood out because she was, until Tuesday, one of the few women to ascend to the peak of her extremely male-dominated field: the world of the sports insider. Insiders have always existed in various forms of journalism. But the internet morphing every outlet into a 24-hour news service, followed by social media making every single journalist (like it or not) into a personal brand that can speak directly to fans, transformed the ability to break transactional news into a position of great power, particularly in sports. You probably don’t even know that guys like Adam Schefter and former NBA insider Adrian Wojnarowski used to be newspaper people (covering the Denver Broncos and as a Fresno Bee sports columnist, respectively). They didn’t get wealthy or famous by writing in paragraphs, though. They made their millions as insiders, breaking news about player trades and contracts.

It’s not really surprising that insiders have been mostly men, in part because sports journalism already tends to lean male, and because being a person who covers powerful people invariably means spending a lot of time around men. Want to cover the CEOs of the biggest companies in the United States? That’s mostly men. Want to cover the U.S. Senate? That’s gonna be a lot of men. Want to cover cops, courts, or professional sports? You get the idea.

This matters—more than non-journalists realize—because being a good reporter, in the dwindling embers of what remains of mass media, remains one of the surest ways to secure a job in journalism. This is what I was told in college. It’s still true, even as the jobs have disappeared. For proof, look no further than Cleveland, where the Plain Dealer is outsourcing writing to AI—but not reporting….

This might not be the absolute end for Russini. It shouldn’t be. She can start her own newsletter, her own podcast, or her own YouTube channel, and people with far worse blemishes on their record seem to be thriving in those mediums. She’s talented, engaging on camera, and has a breadth of experience few can match. That will be valuable somewhere, in some capacity. This likely will be the end of the road for her as an NFL insider at a major outlet, though.

This won’t be the end for female reporters or insiders. Women in sports reporting, and all of reporting, have come too far. But I am not naive enough to believe that nobody will hold this against us, that women out in the field won’t have to hear horrible jokes about it from sources for years, or the trolls online will read all my good points and go quiet. What will emerge will be a cautionary tale told to younger women, about what you stand to lose if you screw up and how you can hurt more than just yourself, a tale like those once told to me. All we can do is just keep saying no, over and over and over again.

The NFL is not investigating Mike Vrabel's behavior after published photos of the New England Patriots coach and former Athletic reporter Dianna Russini at an Arizona resort prompted her resignation and an internal investigation at The New York Times-owned sports outlet.

[image or embed]

— The Associated Press (@apnews.com) April 18, 2026 at 6:00 PM

Excellent Read: <em>“You Can Never Let Them Think They Have A Chance”</em>Post + Comments (41)

Open Thread: Womens’ Work, Raw Milk Edition

by Anne Laurie|  September 4, 20251:27 am| 99 Comments

This post is in: Healthcare, Open Threads, Show Us on the Doll Where the Invisible Hand Touched You, Women's Rights Are Human Rights

When people say "We used to drink raw milk from our own cow and it was fine,"
That's… usually not the case!
In families w their own cow, the mom usually boiled it before using.
We just forgot bc that's a boring chore that mom did. And who pays attention to that?
youtu.be/vKDPast9WFk

[image or embed]

— Sarah Taber (@sarahtaber.bsky.social) September 3, 2025 at 2:30 PM

===

Boiling milk before use was just what you did. They had dedicated cookware for it. (Specially shaped to contain boil-overs, which milk is really prone to.)
Household hygiene had SERIOUSLY high stakes back before hot running water & pasteurization.
That's… like… why they taught home economics.

[image or embed]

— Sarah Taber (@sarahtaber.bsky.social) September 3, 2025 at 2:30 PM

===

The replies are amazing
90% "Yeah my family boiled the milk" and 10% "What are you talking about? We never did that."
Today is the day some people find out why the neighbors judged their great-grandma so hard for being a bad housekeeper : /

— Sarah Taber (@sarahtaber.bsky.social) September 3, 2025 at 5:44 PM

===

show full post on front page

I lived for several years in rural cattle country in Central Africa, where milk was a major part of the diet. All the milk was either boiled or fermented to make it safe. Always. No one ever drank raw milk.

— Tim Longman ?????? (@timlongman.bsky.social) September 3, 2025 at 2:36 PM


===

Can second this among traditional folks in rural Kenya and Tanzania. Never once heard of or saw anyone drinking “raw” milk. In Ethiopia they have a dish that is essentially raw meat and they boil the milk.

— M Maher (@marvelle.bsky.social) September 3, 2025 at 3:51 PM

===

I saw a thread a while back where raw milkers were talking about heating it up to disinfect it
We’re about to enter a decade of reinventing the wheel from first principles lol

— Tree Person ?? (@treeperson.bsky.social) September 3, 2025 at 2:48 PM

===

Using "The Farm Master Pasteurizer" from Sears and Roebuck, possibly…..

[image or embed]

— Jane Austen's Political Tweets (@vee40below0.bsky.social) September 3, 2025 at 3:04 PM

Open Thread: Womens’ Work, Raw Milk EditionPost + Comments (99)

Another Weekend Update: Epstein & His Victims

by Anne Laurie|  August 4, 20251:28 am| 45 Comments

This post is in: Open Threads, The War On Women, Trump Crime Cartel

the maxwell transfer is a distraction from the epstein story which is a distraction from the tariffs which is a distraction from the deportations which is a distraction from the BLS chaos which is a distraction from the fed business which is a distraction from doge which is a distraction from

— GOLIKEHELLMACHINE (@golikehellmachine.com) August 1, 2025 at 7:06 PM

===

THEY KNEW. “the worst kept secret in the social society circles in both Palm Beach and NY. It wasn’t just Trump who was there. There were people in the media…in science. There were tons of people that were at these events and at these parties with young girls”
open.substack.com/pub/contrari…

[image or embed]

— Jen Rubin (@jenrubin.bsky.social) August 1, 2025 at 11:02 AM

===

well, that should tamp down the speculation, great work everyone
[image or embed]

— GOLIKEHELLMACHINE (@golikehellmachine.com) August 1, 2025 at 5:41 PM


===

it’s completely fucking crazy that ghislaine maxwell got a favorable transfer which she legally did not qualify for, based on a conversation with the deputy AG who used to be the president’s personal lawyer, that does not seem like it will ever become public, let alone be used in a prosecution

— GOLIKEHELLMACHINE (@golikehellmachine.com) August 1, 2025 at 6:14 PM


===

fwiw, i’m not sure how likely it is, but i do think it’s not out of the realm of possibility that they just quietly release her without any paperwork and no one figures it out until she’s left the country
[image or embed]

— GOLIKEHELLMACHINE (@golikehellmachine.com) August 1, 2025 at 6:30 PM


===

you can’t really pardon her, politically, it’s a fucking disaster; you can’t really kill her, that just pours a river’s worth of accelerant on an already-dangerous fire; but what if you could do a secret, third thing (functionally disappear her)

— GOLIKEHELLMACHINE (@golikehellmachine.com) August 1, 2025 at 6:34 PM

===

Brown: Brad Edwards deposed Epstein’s accountant—she worked for Epstein’s modeling company
She gave more detail than we had heard before, including the fact that when Epstein formed that company, he told her he wanted it to be set up just like Trump’s modeling agency.
[image or embed]

— Acyn (@acyn.bsky.social) August 2, 2025 at 5:09 PM


===

show full post on front page

Since No One Else Seems to Care, Let’s Remember Epstein’s Survivors www.jezebel.com/since-no-one…
[image or embed]

— Gingerbird🦉 (@gingerbird.bsky.social) July 31, 2025 at 5:49 AM

===

From Puck, “Johnson Loses the Epstein Caucus”:

When a House Oversight subcommittee voted to subpoena the Justice Department to release the so-called Epstein files last week, Georgia Rep. Brian Jack made a surprising decision. The freshman congressman and Trump loyalist, who served as the president’s political director during his first term and remains close with him and White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, was one of three Republicans to vote with Democrats. House Republicans generally rely on Jack for insight into the president’s thinking, and he’s been given plum assignments, including candidate recruitment for House Republicans and a seat on the powerful Steering and Rules committees. And yet here he was openly defying Trump in support of a Democratic amendment that would force the D.O.J.’s hand and metastasize a fomenting political scandal.

But Jack was in political survivor mode. Two weeks ago, as one of the members of the House Rules Committee, he and other Republicans had voted against Epstein-related amendments pushed by Democrats, causing a backlash online and from voters and eventually halting business in the House, as I reported last week. The voters in Jack’s conservative district—the same ones who propelled him to victory in a Republican primary runoff, and then a 33-point drubbing of his Democratic opponent—were demanding transparency on the Epstein issue. By Wednesday, according to a lawmaker who spoke to him, Jack had decided he had no choice but to back the subpoena before he headed home for recess to face his constituents…

As the meeting got underway, a frustrated Rep. Clay Higgins, chair of the subcommittee, told Johnson in a testy phone call, according to two people familiar with the situation, that his committee wouldn’t be able to beat back Epstein-related measures, putting members in the difficult position of having to choose between Trump and a demanding MAGA base. Higgins questioned why the committee was even gaveling in. Loudly echoing rank-and-file Republican members, he demanded to hear the speaker’s plan to address the wave of Epstein measures. Johnson didn’t have much of a strategy.

Two other Republicans joined Jack in voting for the subpoena: South Carolina Rep. Nancy Mace and Pennsylvania Rep. Scott Perry, a Freedom Caucus member in one of the most competitive districts in the country. When Perry was later asked about Epstein at a telephone town hall last week, he declared that he’d voted for transparency. “I have requested the files,” he said, according to NPR. “I have requested that the D.O.J.—and you can see the letter publicly—that the D.O.J. release the files. Not only that, they also provide a special prosecutor.”

Rep. Andy Biggs, another Freedom Caucus member, had seemed as though he was going to back the Justice Department subpoena but waited until after the other committee members had voted, and then voted against it. One Republican insisted that Biggs will lose his bid for governor in Arizona over that vote. I’m not sure that’s true, but it shows how paranoid Republicans have become about the Epstein issue. Others think Biggs probably voted against the measure because he’s seeking Trump’s endorsement for his gubernatorial race.

In any case, it appears that Johnson’s balmy six-month honeymoon with this Congress, thanks largely to Trump’s support, is over. He’s struggling to control his conference and lacks a coherent strategy to turn the page. Of course, it doesn’t help that Trump and the White House are also floundering. As it turns out, if you build a presidential campaign around “exposing the truth,” you get penalized when you look like you’re covering it up instead…

someone from the white house got on the phone with comer and told him that he should not under any circumstances be allowed to testify in front of congress.

[image or embed]

— GOLIKEHELLMACHINE (@golikehellmachine.com) August 1, 2025 at 6:47 PM

===

New in PN: Why Epstein has Trump crashing out
“At this point, Trump might as well release all the files. They can’t do any more damage than he does himself whenever he opens his mouth on the subject.”
[image or embed]

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) August 1, 2025 at 8:09 AM

===

Josh Marshall, at TPM:

… I’ve said several times that the extremity of Trump’s reaction and the level of apparent panic it’s driving must be in some degree proportionate to whatever he’s keeping secret. But what if it’s not? One long time TPM Reader put this to me over the weekend. He basically said: think how long and hard Trump fought to keep his taxes secret. And yet when they finally came out it was pretty underwhelming. So maybe this is just Trump’s reflex? He doesn’t want anyone in his business and he just goes to war even if there’s not that much reason to do so…

It’s a worthwhile cautionary note. But I don’t think this is the same as the tax return issue. Yes, Trump fought that for years. But that almost entirely amounted to saying “no” over and over again. Yes, he fought it in court. But that’s what Trump does. He fights things in court. He’s got plenty of money for lawyers. That didn’t require any real exertion on his part and, critically, it didn’t involve doing himself much political harm other than the general suspicions that his opponents had of him from all the way back in 2015. And in any case there’s always going to be a limit in what you’re going to find in anyone’s tax returns. It’s information you’re giving to the government! You’re not going to find: bribe from Saddam Hussein; miscellaneous payments for sex to underage girls.

The key is that the reaction is just very different. Trump has sustained a lot of damage from the last few weeks. It’s spurred a major fracture in his MAGA coalition, almost unheard of criticism from core supporters in the MAGA cinematic universe. It’s not too much to say that the story has completely consumed Washington, D.C. as well as the Congress and executive branch. At least for the moment it’s stymieing his whole agenda. This is hurting him a lot and I don’t think he’d be allowing himself to sustain this level of damage if he didn’t see what’s in those files (or what he fears is in those files) as a big threat.

Of course, it’s possible he doesn’t know for certain what’s in the files but he knows what he did. He can’t take the risk of finding out. You could turn my life upside down and review all my private notebooks and I have perfect confidence you wouldn’t find any evidence I ever played Major League Baseball. I’m 100% innocent. Trump clearly doesn’t have that confidence about this.

I still can’t imagine what could be that bad or frankly what he’s worried about. I really have a hard time believing any of this is happening. But it is happening. And I’m going to stick to thinking the black hole is there because of the gravitational force I see it exerting.

===

How Does the Epstein Scandal End? 

===

this remains such an incredibly strange way to answer a very easy question
[image or embed]

— GOLIKEHELLMACHINE (@golikehellmachine.com) August 1, 2025 at 8:32 PM

Another Weekend Update: Epstein & His VictimsPost + Comments (45)

Monday Evening Open Thread: A Win, If We Can Keep It

by Anne Laurie|  July 7, 20257:59 pm| 17 Comments

This post is in: Open Threads, Republican Politics, Women's Rights

BREAKING: A federal judge just blocked the "big beautiful bill's" provision to defund Planned Parenthood. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us…

[image or embed]

— Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney.bsky.social) July 7, 2025 at 6:11 PM

Backstory:

Planned Parenthood sues Trump administration over planned defunding.
In a complaint filed in Boston federal court, Planned Parenthood said the provision is unconstitutional, and its clear purpose is to prevent its nearly 600 health centers from receiving Medicaid.
www.reuters.com/legal/litiga…

[image or embed]

— Liz (or Lizzie) Kim 김혜성 💫 (@liz.sheshed.rocks) July 7, 2025 at 12:05 PM

show full post on front page

… The complaint was filed 11 days after the U.S. Supreme Court, in a 6-3 vote, cleared the way for South Carolina to deny Medicaid funds to Planned Parenthood, saying the applicable federal law did not authorize the group to sue.

Monday’s lawsuit seeks an injunction to block the government from denying Medicaid funds to “prohibited” entities, including abortion providers and entities receiving more than $800,000 in Medicaid funds in the 2023 fiscal year.

The parent entity, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, said it does not provide abortion care and has never received Medicaid funds, but that the law was drafted to target its members, including those that do not provide abortions.

It said clinics that could face closure are in 24 U.S. states, with more than 90% in states where abortion is legal.

Planned Parenthood said the law violates its members’ constitutional rights to free association under the First Amendment and equal protection under the Fifth Amendment. Member groups in Massachusetts and Utah are also plaintiffs.

“This case is about making sure that patients who use Medicaid as their insurance to get birth control, cancer screenings, and STI (sexually transmitted infection) testing and treatment can continue to do so at their local Planned Parenthood health center,” Planned Parenthood President Alexis McGill Johnson said in a statement…

Monday Evening Open Thread: A Win, If We Can Keep ItPost + Comments (17)

Saturday Morning Open Thread: Our 28th Amendment, If We Can Keep It

by Anne Laurie|  January 18, 20257:51 am| 283 Comments

This post is in: Justice, Open Threads, Proud to Be A Democrat, Republican Venality, Women's Rights Are Human Rights

This is a nice thing to have for three days. Enjoy your Equality Weekend, ladies!

[image or embed]

— Patrick S. Tomlinson (@stealthygeek.bsky.social) January 17, 2025 at 10:15 AM

… Which, of course, we almost certainly can’t — not given the incoming maladministration, and America’s long history of general and specific misogyny. But I do appreciate the gesture, even while wishing President Biden had done this even a few weeks sooner.

President Biden: "Today, I affirm the Equal Rights Amendment has cleared all the necessary hurdles to be added to the U.S. Constitution, now! The Equal Rights Amendment is the law of the land, now! It's the 28th Amendment to the Constitution, now!" pic.twitter.com/7MiztbKVRv

— CSPAN (@cspan) January 17, 2025

I have supported the Equal Rights Amendment for more than 50 years and have long been clear that no one should be discriminated against based on their sex.

We must affirm and protect women’s full equality once and for all.

— President Biden (@POTUS) January 17, 2025

Ed Kilgore, at NYMag — “Biden Says ERA Is Ratified, But Supreme Court Gets Final Say”:

In one of those why the hell not? gestures open to a president down to his last weekend in office, Joe Biden declared the Equal Rights Amendment ratified and thus the 28th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. A host of feminists and Democratic politicians have been urging this step from the moment Biden took office, based on three recent state ratifications (Nevada in 2017, Illinois in 2018, and Virginia in 2020) executed in defiance of a 1982 congressional deadline that ERA proponents failed to meet (35 of the 38 required ratifications had happened by then). Indeed, the House formally repealed the ratification deadline in 2021 and dismissed as legally ineffectual actions by five conservative state legislatures to rescind prior ratifications. But the Senate never acted, leaving the whole question in legal limbo.

From a technical point of view, the national archivist has the power to recognize ratified constitutional amendments by officially publishing them, and Biden urged this obscure official to do that with the ERA. But in December, anticipating this action, the archivist denied she had the power to do so. She cited prior legal precedents suggesting the 1982 deadline was indeed valid, not to mention ongoing litigation over the Virginia ratification…

While there have already been rallies at the National Archives to dramatize the issue, there’s every indication that the whole controversy will wind up at the Supreme Court, whose conservative majority is not terribly likely to redeem the decadeslong push for an ERA. But Biden’s action will revive the topic and all the underlying issues of long-postponed equality until such time as the Supreme Court acts.

show full post on front page

It’s also something of a vindication for the junior U.S. senator from New York, notes CNN:

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, Democrat of New York, has been making a major push for certification, saying in a memo to interested parties that it would give Biden a way to “codify women’s freedom and equality without needing anything from a bitterly divided and broken Congress” in the aftermath of the 2022 Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade …

The Equal Rights Amendment is the 28th Amendment, and it is the law of the land. pic.twitter.com/jl1Ewg2JAf

— Vice President Kamala Harris (@VP) January 17, 2025

Women's rights are human rights, and human rights are women's rights.

I'm thrilled President Biden has affirmed the Equal Rights Amendment as the law of the land, guaranteeing all Americans equal rights and protections under the law regardless of their sex.…

— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) January 17, 2025

From a brave, however doomed, thread:

I’m seeing a lot of confusion about the Equal Rights Amendment online.
I've been working on the ERA for 13 years & literally wrote a book about it.
So, let me help answer some questions.
1) Yes, it really is a real amendment & fully part of the U.S. Constitution. Full stop.

[image or embed]

— Kate Kelly (@katekelly.bsky.social) January 17, 2025 at 3:58 PM

The Archivist has no constitutional or legal role in the amending process. She does NOT get to decide what is or is not in the U.S. Constitution.
Her boss (the President of the United States) has spoken for his Administration.
That's it. The ERA is in! This is a victory.

— Kate Kelly (@katekelly.bsky.social) January 17, 2025 at 4:01 PM

In the words of @tribelaw.bsky.social & Professor Kathleen Sullivan:
contrarian.substack.com/p/the-equal-…

[image or embed]

— Kate Kelly (@katekelly.bsky.social) January 17, 2025 at 4:02 PM

The struggle continues!

Women marched on Washington, met with Congress, and crossed the 38-state threshold to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment.

A century in the making… it is long overdue. pic.twitter.com/gszAjgPMsf

— Senate Judiciary Democrats ???? (@JudiciaryDems) January 17, 2025

Saturday Morning Open Thread: Our 28th Amendment, If We Can Keep ItPost + Comments (283)

Party Boys

by Betty Cracker|  December 2, 20243:49 pm| 145 Comments

This post is in: Domestic Politics, Open Threads, Politics, Republican Stupidity, The War On Women

We know the Fox News personality Trump nominated to run the Department of Defense, Pete Hegseth, is a creep who abuses women. Heck, his own mother said so, as Anne Laurie covered in a recent post. In case you missed it, Penelope Hegseth emailed the following comments to her son (source is the NYT):

“On behalf of all the women (and I know it’s many) you have abused in some way, I say … get some help and take an honest look at yourself,” Penelope Hegseth wrote, stating that she still loved him.

She also wrote: “I have no respect for any man that belittles, lies, cheats, sleeps around and uses women for his own power and ego. You are that man (and have been for years) and as your mother, it pains me and embarrasses me to say that, but it is the sad, sad truth.”

She took it all back when contacted by the Times for comment and claimed Hegseth is a good husband and father. That’s the mother’s version of a horndog politician’s wife standing stoically next to her man during a press conference called to address a gross sex scandal.

Women are routinely expected to endure this sort of humiliation to preserve men’s hold on power. There’s no payoff for them, of course. Just ask Hillary Clinton.

I thought maybe that would change eventually, but we’re going backward in this country on women’s equality. An adjudicated rapist will put his tiny hand on a bible soon and be restored to the highest office in the land. The parade of sex offenders around the sex pest in chief is a big FUCK YOU to women, whether they acknowledge it or not (and many do not).

But the Hegseth nomination is also a giant FUCK YOU to basic competence, as The New Yorker’s Jane Mayer revealed in an article published yesterday. I suppose it’s paywalled, but here’s a link. Excerpts below:

…Hegseth’s record before becoming a full-time Fox News TV host, in 2017, raises additional questions about his suitability to run the world’s largest and most lethal military force. A trail of documents, corroborated by the accounts of former colleagues, indicates that Hegseth was forced to step down by both of the two nonprofit advocacy groups that he ran—Veterans for Freedom and Concerned Veterans for America—in the face of serious allegations of financial mismanagement, sexual impropriety, and personal misconduct.

A previously undisclosed whistle-blower report on Hegseth’s tenure as the president of Concerned Veterans for America, from 2013 until 2016, describes him as being repeatedly intoxicated while acting in his official capacity—to the point of needing to be carried out of the organization’s events. The detailed seven-page report—which was compiled by multiple former C.V.A. employees and sent to the organization’s senior management in February, 2015—states that, at one point, Hegseth had to be restrained while drunk from joining the dancers on the stage of a Louisiana strip club, where he had brought his team. The report also says that Hegseth, who was married at the time, and other members of his management team sexually pursued the organization’s female staffers, whom they divided into two groups—the “party girls” and the “not party girls.” In addition, the report asserts that, under Hegseth’s leadership, the organization became a hostile workplace that ignored serious accusations of impropriety, including an allegation made by a female employee that another employee on Hegseth’s staff had attempted to sexually assault her at the Louisiana strip club. In a separate letter of complaint, which was sent to the organization in late 2015, a different former employee described Hegseth being at a bar in the early-morning hours of May 29, 2015, while on an official tour through Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, drunkenly chanting “Kill All Muslims! Kill All Muslims!”

To sum up, Hegseth is a blackout drunk who sexually harassed female employees and tolerated the same behavior from other members of his team. He’s an accused rapist and alleged bigot. That would normally be a problem for the potential leader of the DoD, but “norm” flew out the window a long time ago. However, Hegseth’s incompetence is disqualifying even if the character issue is moot these days:

Margaret Hoover, a Republican political commentator and political strategist who worked as an adviser to V.F.F. between 2008 and 2010, recently told CNN that she had grave concerns about Hegseth’s ability to run the Pentagon, the largest department in the federal government, given his mismanagement at V.F.F. “I watched him run an organization very poorly, lose the confidence of donors. The organization ultimately folded and was forced to merge with another organization who individuals felt could run and manage funds on behalf of donors more responsibly than he could. That was my experience with him.” Hoover stressed that V.F.F. was an exceedingly small organization, with fewer than ten employees, and a budget of between five million and ten million dollars. She told CNN, “And he couldn’t do that properly, I don’t know how he’s going to run an organization with an eight-hundred-and-fifty-seven-billion-dollar budget and three million individuals.”

Good question, Ms. Hoover.

One amusing aspect of this disgraceful mess: Hegseth allegedly lied to the Trump people and said no skeletons would tumble out of his closet if he were nominated, so they were “blindsided” when the rape accusation and payoff surfaced.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Trump’s transition team was blindsided by the sexual-assault story because Hegseth had failed to disclose anything about it, including the fact that he had paid off his accuser. He also failed to disclose that he had received a copy of the police report in 2021, long before the Monterey police’s recent release of it. The series of damning revelations has reportedly infuriated the transition team. “When we ask, ‘Is there anything else we need to know about?’ that is usually a good time to mention a police report,” a Trump adviser told Rolling Stone. “Obviously he remembered that this all happened and there is no way—I don’t think—he could have believed this wouldn’t come out once he got nominated.”

Well, maybe Hegseth is yet another scumbag following the corporate ethos of an organization led by Donald J. Trump, so he felt no need to disclose anything. If the boss can sexually assault and defame women with impunity and be reelected, why should Hegseth see his own sordid history as an obstacle to an important job?

The truth is, a critical mass in this country despises women and scoffs at basic standards of competence — or else is so indifferent that it amounts to the same thing. That’s not a hot take; it’s been cooling on the windowsill like a rancid pie for decades.

Open thread.

Party BoysPost + Comments (145)

Relentless Positivity Open Thread: No More Handmaids

by Anne Laurie|  November 4, 20245:22 pm| 194 Comments

This post is in: Elections 2024, Kamala Harris for President, Open Threads, Proud to Be A Democrat, Women's Rights Are Human Rights

STOCKPILE - No More Handmaidens

(Mike Luckovich via GoComics.com)

On Saturday, in a fierce show of support for Kamala Harris, thousands of women marched in Washington, D.C. and across the country. ???????????????? pic.twitter.com/qV3HdxIx1F

— Bill Madden (@maddenifico) November 3, 2024

"why do we need an ad telling women that their vote is private"

Meanwhile on Fox: https://t.co/yBXjb2sr8V

— ??Dante Atkins?? (@DanteAtkins) October 31, 2024

When your marriage is rock solid

[image or embed]

— Molly Knight (@mollyknight.bsky.social) November 1, 2024 at 11:08 AM

As I wrote yesterday, "The word reflects a larger tendency of Trump and his followers to see women not as people, but as property of men, especially powerful white men." https://t.co/DNmtrstQm2 https://t.co/Dlhxc6zcuZ

— Amanda Marcotte (@AmandaMarcotte) November 2, 2024

This happened to me in NC last week. The man told us his wife was napping and couldn’t come to the door. https://t.co/NfJ03y4Bgl

— Neera Tanden?? (@neeratanden) November 2, 2024

STOCKPILE - No More Handmaidens 2

(John Deering via GoComics.com)

show full post on front page

This actually tracks, and not just for women. It isn’t so much husbands women fear as people generally knowing they’ve violated community norms. The fusion of politics with religion makes the stakes very high. Extremely hard to stand up against Trump when you’ll be accused of… https://t.co/cZzBidN6lr

— Brent Orrell (@OrrellAEI) October 31, 2024

My wife is from rural central PA. The community is quite stable, lots of great support from neighbors. But the price of inclusion is conformity. Being outside that circle is extremely risky from a psychological standpoint.

— Brent Orrell (@OrrellAEI) October 31, 2024

It is a habit formed in the pews where pastors and other leaders are very concerned about policing theological boundaries. It is a religious sociology applied to politics.

— Brent Orrell (@OrrellAEI) October 31, 2024

This post and the ad it is based on is getting the response it is getting is because being a petty tyrant over at least your family, and then moving that circle outward, is the basis of most of conservative politics. https://t.co/yiz2Flrz2m

— A. Bartaway????????? (@Bartaway) October 30, 2024

I agree with this. A personal anecdote: a female relative who has never voted for Democrats told me today that she was voting for Harris. I asked why. Abortion. Horrified by what she's learned about the state-level bans. https://t.co/o8JuCZC3xP

— Alex גדעון בן װעלװל (@JewishWonk) November 4, 2024

if it turns out that we (harris) win, and that it was due to a shift with women voters, remember that "should women vote?" was absolutely not a question serious people were entertaining in 2016 and it's visible as discourse in 2024. who knows if it'll be enough but it is a thing

— cai (@AnneNotation) November 3, 2024

"Women are not without electoral or political power." https://t.co/AFjDTCXRQo

— Molly Jong-Fast (@MollyJongFast) November 4, 2024

Trump’s hatred of women is bolder and clearer than ever. There’s no turning back now, Republican misogyny has long lost the woman vote. See you next Tuesday, Donald. pic.twitter.com/2BE6waAAbK

— The Lincoln Project (@ProjectLincoln) November 4, 2024

STOCKPILE - No More Handmaidens 1

(Matt Davies via GoComics.com)

Relentless Positivity Open Thread: No More HandmaidsPost + Comments (194)

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 177
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - SkyBluePink -  10 Photos 6
Photo by SkyBluePink (4/15/26)

Election Resources

Voter Registration Info – Find a State
Check Voter Registration by Address
Election Calendar by State

Targeted Fundraising Info & Links

Recent Comments

  • chemiclord on Wednesday Afternoon Open Thread (Apr 22, 2026 @ 4:49pm)
  • Kathleen on Wednesday Morning Open Thread (Apr 22, 2026 @ 4:49pm)
  • Ohio Mom on Wednesday Afternoon Open Thread (Apr 22, 2026 @ 4:47pm)
  • cain on Wednesday Afternoon Open Thread (Apr 22, 2026 @ 4:47pm)
  • stinger on Wednesday Afternoon Open Thread (Apr 22, 2026 @ 4:47pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Outsmarting Apple iOS 26

Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Order Calendar A
Order Calendar B

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix
Rose Judson (podcast)
Sister Golden Bear

Goal Met, thank you!

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Privacy Manager

Copyright © 2026 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc