• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Lick the third rail, it tastes like chocolate!

Dumb motherfuckers cannot understand a consequence that most 4 year olds have fully sorted out.

the 10% who apparently lack object permanence

There are a lot more evil idiots than evil geniuses.

We still have time to mess this up!

Human rights are not a matter of opinion!

Wow, I can’t imagine what it was like to comment in morse code.

Fundamental belief of white supremacy: white people are presumed innocent, minorities are presumed guilty.

They punch you in the face and then start crying because their fist hurts.

Proof that we need a blogger ethics panel.

Accountability, motherfuckers.

Dear legacy media: you are not here to influence outcomes and policies you find desirable.

The press swings at every pitch, we don’t have to.

Yeah, with this crowd one never knows.

Let me eat cake. The rest of you could stand to lose some weight, frankly.

When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty. ~Thomas Jefferson

Michigan is a great lesson for Dems everywhere: when you have power…use it!

Every one of the “Roberts Six” lied to get on the court.

Usually wrong but never in doubt

The republican caucus is covering themselves with something, and it is not glory.

To the privileged, equality seems like oppression.

Shallow, uninformed, and lacking identity

The Supreme Court cannot be allowed to become the ultimate, unaccountable arbiter of everything.

SCOTUS: It’s not “bribery” unless it comes from the Bribery region of France. Otherwise, it’s merely “sparkling malfeasance”.

Mobile Menu

  • 2026 Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Archives for Justice / Women's Rights

Women's Rights

Open Thread: Womens’ Work, Raw Milk Edition

by Anne Laurie|  September 4, 20251:27 am| 99 Comments

This post is in: Healthcare, Open Threads, Show Us on the Doll Where the Invisible Hand Touched You, Women's Rights Are Human Rights

When people say "We used to drink raw milk from our own cow and it was fine,"
That's… usually not the case!
In families w their own cow, the mom usually boiled it before using.
We just forgot bc that's a boring chore that mom did. And who pays attention to that?
youtu.be/vKDPast9WFk

[image or embed]

— Sarah Taber (@sarahtaber.bsky.social) September 3, 2025 at 2:30 PM

===

Boiling milk before use was just what you did. They had dedicated cookware for it. (Specially shaped to contain boil-overs, which milk is really prone to.)
Household hygiene had SERIOUSLY high stakes back before hot running water & pasteurization.
That's… like… why they taught home economics.

[image or embed]

— Sarah Taber (@sarahtaber.bsky.social) September 3, 2025 at 2:30 PM

===

The replies are amazing
90% "Yeah my family boiled the milk" and 10% "What are you talking about? We never did that."
Today is the day some people find out why the neighbors judged their great-grandma so hard for being a bad housekeeper : /

— Sarah Taber (@sarahtaber.bsky.social) September 3, 2025 at 5:44 PM

===

show full post on front page

I lived for several years in rural cattle country in Central Africa, where milk was a major part of the diet. All the milk was either boiled or fermented to make it safe. Always. No one ever drank raw milk.

— Tim Longman ?????? (@timlongman.bsky.social) September 3, 2025 at 2:36 PM


===

Can second this among traditional folks in rural Kenya and Tanzania. Never once heard of or saw anyone drinking “raw” milk. In Ethiopia they have a dish that is essentially raw meat and they boil the milk.

— M Maher (@marvelle.bsky.social) September 3, 2025 at 3:51 PM

===

I saw a thread a while back where raw milkers were talking about heating it up to disinfect it
We’re about to enter a decade of reinventing the wheel from first principles lol

— Tree Person ?? (@treeperson.bsky.social) September 3, 2025 at 2:48 PM

===

Using "The Farm Master Pasteurizer" from Sears and Roebuck, possibly…..

[image or embed]

— Jane Austen's Political Tweets (@vee40below0.bsky.social) September 3, 2025 at 3:04 PM

Open Thread: Womens’ Work, Raw Milk EditionPost + Comments (99)

Another Weekend Update: Epstein & His Victims

by Anne Laurie|  August 4, 20251:28 am| 45 Comments

This post is in: Open Threads, The War On Women, Trump Crime Cartel

the maxwell transfer is a distraction from the epstein story which is a distraction from the tariffs which is a distraction from the deportations which is a distraction from the BLS chaos which is a distraction from the fed business which is a distraction from doge which is a distraction from

— GOLIKEHELLMACHINE (@golikehellmachine.com) August 1, 2025 at 7:06 PM

===

THEY KNEW. “the worst kept secret in the social society circles in both Palm Beach and NY. It wasn’t just Trump who was there. There were people in the media…in science. There were tons of people that were at these events and at these parties with young girls”
open.substack.com/pub/contrari…

[image or embed]

— Jen Rubin (@jenrubin.bsky.social) August 1, 2025 at 11:02 AM

===

well, that should tamp down the speculation, great work everyone
[image or embed]

— GOLIKEHELLMACHINE (@golikehellmachine.com) August 1, 2025 at 5:41 PM


===

it’s completely fucking crazy that ghislaine maxwell got a favorable transfer which she legally did not qualify for, based on a conversation with the deputy AG who used to be the president’s personal lawyer, that does not seem like it will ever become public, let alone be used in a prosecution

— GOLIKEHELLMACHINE (@golikehellmachine.com) August 1, 2025 at 6:14 PM


===

fwiw, i’m not sure how likely it is, but i do think it’s not out of the realm of possibility that they just quietly release her without any paperwork and no one figures it out until she’s left the country
[image or embed]

— GOLIKEHELLMACHINE (@golikehellmachine.com) August 1, 2025 at 6:30 PM


===

you can’t really pardon her, politically, it’s a fucking disaster; you can’t really kill her, that just pours a river’s worth of accelerant on an already-dangerous fire; but what if you could do a secret, third thing (functionally disappear her)

— GOLIKEHELLMACHINE (@golikehellmachine.com) August 1, 2025 at 6:34 PM

===

Brown: Brad Edwards deposed Epstein’s accountant—she worked for Epstein’s modeling company
She gave more detail than we had heard before, including the fact that when Epstein formed that company, he told her he wanted it to be set up just like Trump’s modeling agency.
[image or embed]

— Acyn (@acyn.bsky.social) August 2, 2025 at 5:09 PM


===

show full post on front page

Since No One Else Seems to Care, Let’s Remember Epstein’s Survivors www.jezebel.com/since-no-one…
[image or embed]

— Gingerbird🦉 (@gingerbird.bsky.social) July 31, 2025 at 5:49 AM

===

From Puck, “Johnson Loses the Epstein Caucus”:

When a House Oversight subcommittee voted to subpoena the Justice Department to release the so-called Epstein files last week, Georgia Rep. Brian Jack made a surprising decision. The freshman congressman and Trump loyalist, who served as the president’s political director during his first term and remains close with him and White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, was one of three Republicans to vote with Democrats. House Republicans generally rely on Jack for insight into the president’s thinking, and he’s been given plum assignments, including candidate recruitment for House Republicans and a seat on the powerful Steering and Rules committees. And yet here he was openly defying Trump in support of a Democratic amendment that would force the D.O.J.’s hand and metastasize a fomenting political scandal.

But Jack was in political survivor mode. Two weeks ago, as one of the members of the House Rules Committee, he and other Republicans had voted against Epstein-related amendments pushed by Democrats, causing a backlash online and from voters and eventually halting business in the House, as I reported last week. The voters in Jack’s conservative district—the same ones who propelled him to victory in a Republican primary runoff, and then a 33-point drubbing of his Democratic opponent—were demanding transparency on the Epstein issue. By Wednesday, according to a lawmaker who spoke to him, Jack had decided he had no choice but to back the subpoena before he headed home for recess to face his constituents…

As the meeting got underway, a frustrated Rep. Clay Higgins, chair of the subcommittee, told Johnson in a testy phone call, according to two people familiar with the situation, that his committee wouldn’t be able to beat back Epstein-related measures, putting members in the difficult position of having to choose between Trump and a demanding MAGA base. Higgins questioned why the committee was even gaveling in. Loudly echoing rank-and-file Republican members, he demanded to hear the speaker’s plan to address the wave of Epstein measures. Johnson didn’t have much of a strategy.

Two other Republicans joined Jack in voting for the subpoena: South Carolina Rep. Nancy Mace and Pennsylvania Rep. Scott Perry, a Freedom Caucus member in one of the most competitive districts in the country. When Perry was later asked about Epstein at a telephone town hall last week, he declared that he’d voted for transparency. “I have requested the files,” he said, according to NPR. “I have requested that the D.O.J.—and you can see the letter publicly—that the D.O.J. release the files. Not only that, they also provide a special prosecutor.”

Rep. Andy Biggs, another Freedom Caucus member, had seemed as though he was going to back the Justice Department subpoena but waited until after the other committee members had voted, and then voted against it. One Republican insisted that Biggs will lose his bid for governor in Arizona over that vote. I’m not sure that’s true, but it shows how paranoid Republicans have become about the Epstein issue. Others think Biggs probably voted against the measure because he’s seeking Trump’s endorsement for his gubernatorial race.

In any case, it appears that Johnson’s balmy six-month honeymoon with this Congress, thanks largely to Trump’s support, is over. He’s struggling to control his conference and lacks a coherent strategy to turn the page. Of course, it doesn’t help that Trump and the White House are also floundering. As it turns out, if you build a presidential campaign around “exposing the truth,” you get penalized when you look like you’re covering it up instead…

someone from the white house got on the phone with comer and told him that he should not under any circumstances be allowed to testify in front of congress.

[image or embed]

— GOLIKEHELLMACHINE (@golikehellmachine.com) August 1, 2025 at 6:47 PM

===

New in PN: Why Epstein has Trump crashing out
“At this point, Trump might as well release all the files. They can’t do any more damage than he does himself whenever he opens his mouth on the subject.”
[image or embed]

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) August 1, 2025 at 8:09 AM

===

Josh Marshall, at TPM:

… I’ve said several times that the extremity of Trump’s reaction and the level of apparent panic it’s driving must be in some degree proportionate to whatever he’s keeping secret. But what if it’s not? One long time TPM Reader put this to me over the weekend. He basically said: think how long and hard Trump fought to keep his taxes secret. And yet when they finally came out it was pretty underwhelming. So maybe this is just Trump’s reflex? He doesn’t want anyone in his business and he just goes to war even if there’s not that much reason to do so…

It’s a worthwhile cautionary note. But I don’t think this is the same as the tax return issue. Yes, Trump fought that for years. But that almost entirely amounted to saying “no” over and over again. Yes, he fought it in court. But that’s what Trump does. He fights things in court. He’s got plenty of money for lawyers. That didn’t require any real exertion on his part and, critically, it didn’t involve doing himself much political harm other than the general suspicions that his opponents had of him from all the way back in 2015. And in any case there’s always going to be a limit in what you’re going to find in anyone’s tax returns. It’s information you’re giving to the government! You’re not going to find: bribe from Saddam Hussein; miscellaneous payments for sex to underage girls.

The key is that the reaction is just very different. Trump has sustained a lot of damage from the last few weeks. It’s spurred a major fracture in his MAGA coalition, almost unheard of criticism from core supporters in the MAGA cinematic universe. It’s not too much to say that the story has completely consumed Washington, D.C. as well as the Congress and executive branch. At least for the moment it’s stymieing his whole agenda. This is hurting him a lot and I don’t think he’d be allowing himself to sustain this level of damage if he didn’t see what’s in those files (or what he fears is in those files) as a big threat.

Of course, it’s possible he doesn’t know for certain what’s in the files but he knows what he did. He can’t take the risk of finding out. You could turn my life upside down and review all my private notebooks and I have perfect confidence you wouldn’t find any evidence I ever played Major League Baseball. I’m 100% innocent. Trump clearly doesn’t have that confidence about this.

I still can’t imagine what could be that bad or frankly what he’s worried about. I really have a hard time believing any of this is happening. But it is happening. And I’m going to stick to thinking the black hole is there because of the gravitational force I see it exerting.

===

How Does the Epstein Scandal End? 

===

this remains such an incredibly strange way to answer a very easy question
[image or embed]

— GOLIKEHELLMACHINE (@golikehellmachine.com) August 1, 2025 at 8:32 PM

Another Weekend Update: Epstein & His VictimsPost + Comments (45)

Monday Evening Open Thread: A Win, If We Can Keep It

by Anne Laurie|  July 7, 20257:59 pm| 17 Comments

This post is in: Open Threads, Republican Politics, Women's Rights

BREAKING: A federal judge just blocked the "big beautiful bill's" provision to defund Planned Parenthood. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us…

[image or embed]

— Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney.bsky.social) July 7, 2025 at 6:11 PM

Backstory:

Planned Parenthood sues Trump administration over planned defunding.
In a complaint filed in Boston federal court, Planned Parenthood said the provision is unconstitutional, and its clear purpose is to prevent its nearly 600 health centers from receiving Medicaid.
www.reuters.com/legal/litiga…

[image or embed]

— Liz (or Lizzie) Kim 김혜성 💫 (@liz.sheshed.rocks) July 7, 2025 at 12:05 PM

show full post on front page

… The complaint was filed 11 days after the U.S. Supreme Court, in a 6-3 vote, cleared the way for South Carolina to deny Medicaid funds to Planned Parenthood, saying the applicable federal law did not authorize the group to sue.

Monday’s lawsuit seeks an injunction to block the government from denying Medicaid funds to “prohibited” entities, including abortion providers and entities receiving more than $800,000 in Medicaid funds in the 2023 fiscal year.

The parent entity, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, said it does not provide abortion care and has never received Medicaid funds, but that the law was drafted to target its members, including those that do not provide abortions.

It said clinics that could face closure are in 24 U.S. states, with more than 90% in states where abortion is legal.

Planned Parenthood said the law violates its members’ constitutional rights to free association under the First Amendment and equal protection under the Fifth Amendment. Member groups in Massachusetts and Utah are also plaintiffs.

“This case is about making sure that patients who use Medicaid as their insurance to get birth control, cancer screenings, and STI (sexually transmitted infection) testing and treatment can continue to do so at their local Planned Parenthood health center,” Planned Parenthood President Alexis McGill Johnson said in a statement…

Monday Evening Open Thread: A Win, If We Can Keep ItPost + Comments (17)

Saturday Morning Open Thread: Our 28th Amendment, If We Can Keep It

by Anne Laurie|  January 18, 20257:51 am| 283 Comments

This post is in: Justice, Open Threads, Proud to Be A Democrat, Republican Venality, Women's Rights Are Human Rights

This is a nice thing to have for three days. Enjoy your Equality Weekend, ladies!

[image or embed]

— Patrick S. Tomlinson (@stealthygeek.bsky.social) January 17, 2025 at 10:15 AM

… Which, of course, we almost certainly can’t — not given the incoming maladministration, and America’s long history of general and specific misogyny. But I do appreciate the gesture, even while wishing President Biden had done this even a few weeks sooner.

President Biden: "Today, I affirm the Equal Rights Amendment has cleared all the necessary hurdles to be added to the U.S. Constitution, now! The Equal Rights Amendment is the law of the land, now! It's the 28th Amendment to the Constitution, now!" pic.twitter.com/7MiztbKVRv

— CSPAN (@cspan) January 17, 2025

I have supported the Equal Rights Amendment for more than 50 years and have long been clear that no one should be discriminated against based on their sex.

We must affirm and protect women’s full equality once and for all.

— President Biden (@POTUS) January 17, 2025

Ed Kilgore, at NYMag — “Biden Says ERA Is Ratified, But Supreme Court Gets Final Say”:

In one of those why the hell not? gestures open to a president down to his last weekend in office, Joe Biden declared the Equal Rights Amendment ratified and thus the 28th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. A host of feminists and Democratic politicians have been urging this step from the moment Biden took office, based on three recent state ratifications (Nevada in 2017, Illinois in 2018, and Virginia in 2020) executed in defiance of a 1982 congressional deadline that ERA proponents failed to meet (35 of the 38 required ratifications had happened by then). Indeed, the House formally repealed the ratification deadline in 2021 and dismissed as legally ineffectual actions by five conservative state legislatures to rescind prior ratifications. But the Senate never acted, leaving the whole question in legal limbo.

From a technical point of view, the national archivist has the power to recognize ratified constitutional amendments by officially publishing them, and Biden urged this obscure official to do that with the ERA. But in December, anticipating this action, the archivist denied she had the power to do so. She cited prior legal precedents suggesting the 1982 deadline was indeed valid, not to mention ongoing litigation over the Virginia ratification…

While there have already been rallies at the National Archives to dramatize the issue, there’s every indication that the whole controversy will wind up at the Supreme Court, whose conservative majority is not terribly likely to redeem the decadeslong push for an ERA. But Biden’s action will revive the topic and all the underlying issues of long-postponed equality until such time as the Supreme Court acts.

show full post on front page

It’s also something of a vindication for the junior U.S. senator from New York, notes CNN:

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, Democrat of New York, has been making a major push for certification, saying in a memo to interested parties that it would give Biden a way to “codify women’s freedom and equality without needing anything from a bitterly divided and broken Congress” in the aftermath of the 2022 Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade …

The Equal Rights Amendment is the 28th Amendment, and it is the law of the land. pic.twitter.com/jl1Ewg2JAf

— Vice President Kamala Harris (@VP) January 17, 2025

Women's rights are human rights, and human rights are women's rights.

I'm thrilled President Biden has affirmed the Equal Rights Amendment as the law of the land, guaranteeing all Americans equal rights and protections under the law regardless of their sex.…

— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) January 17, 2025

From a brave, however doomed, thread:

I’m seeing a lot of confusion about the Equal Rights Amendment online.
I've been working on the ERA for 13 years & literally wrote a book about it.
So, let me help answer some questions.
1) Yes, it really is a real amendment & fully part of the U.S. Constitution. Full stop.

[image or embed]

— Kate Kelly (@katekelly.bsky.social) January 17, 2025 at 3:58 PM

The Archivist has no constitutional or legal role in the amending process. She does NOT get to decide what is or is not in the U.S. Constitution.
Her boss (the President of the United States) has spoken for his Administration.
That's it. The ERA is in! This is a victory.

— Kate Kelly (@katekelly.bsky.social) January 17, 2025 at 4:01 PM

In the words of @tribelaw.bsky.social & Professor Kathleen Sullivan:
contrarian.substack.com/p/the-equal-…

[image or embed]

— Kate Kelly (@katekelly.bsky.social) January 17, 2025 at 4:02 PM

The struggle continues!

Women marched on Washington, met with Congress, and crossed the 38-state threshold to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment.

A century in the making… it is long overdue. pic.twitter.com/gszAjgPMsf

— Senate Judiciary Democrats ???? (@JudiciaryDems) January 17, 2025

Saturday Morning Open Thread: Our 28th Amendment, If We Can Keep ItPost + Comments (283)

Party Boys

by Betty Cracker|  December 2, 20243:49 pm| 145 Comments

This post is in: Domestic Politics, Open Threads, Politics, Republican Stupidity, The War On Women

We know the Fox News personality Trump nominated to run the Department of Defense, Pete Hegseth, is a creep who abuses women. Heck, his own mother said so, as Anne Laurie covered in a recent post. In case you missed it, Penelope Hegseth emailed the following comments to her son (source is the NYT):

“On behalf of all the women (and I know it’s many) you have abused in some way, I say … get some help and take an honest look at yourself,” Penelope Hegseth wrote, stating that she still loved him.

She also wrote: “I have no respect for any man that belittles, lies, cheats, sleeps around and uses women for his own power and ego. You are that man (and have been for years) and as your mother, it pains me and embarrasses me to say that, but it is the sad, sad truth.”

She took it all back when contacted by the Times for comment and claimed Hegseth is a good husband and father. That’s the mother’s version of a horndog politician’s wife standing stoically next to her man during a press conference called to address a gross sex scandal.

Women are routinely expected to endure this sort of humiliation to preserve men’s hold on power. There’s no payoff for them, of course. Just ask Hillary Clinton.

I thought maybe that would change eventually, but we’re going backward in this country on women’s equality. An adjudicated rapist will put his tiny hand on a bible soon and be restored to the highest office in the land. The parade of sex offenders around the sex pest in chief is a big FUCK YOU to women, whether they acknowledge it or not (and many do not).

But the Hegseth nomination is also a giant FUCK YOU to basic competence, as The New Yorker’s Jane Mayer revealed in an article published yesterday. I suppose it’s paywalled, but here’s a link. Excerpts below:

…Hegseth’s record before becoming a full-time Fox News TV host, in 2017, raises additional questions about his suitability to run the world’s largest and most lethal military force. A trail of documents, corroborated by the accounts of former colleagues, indicates that Hegseth was forced to step down by both of the two nonprofit advocacy groups that he ran—Veterans for Freedom and Concerned Veterans for America—in the face of serious allegations of financial mismanagement, sexual impropriety, and personal misconduct.

A previously undisclosed whistle-blower report on Hegseth’s tenure as the president of Concerned Veterans for America, from 2013 until 2016, describes him as being repeatedly intoxicated while acting in his official capacity—to the point of needing to be carried out of the organization’s events. The detailed seven-page report—which was compiled by multiple former C.V.A. employees and sent to the organization’s senior management in February, 2015—states that, at one point, Hegseth had to be restrained while drunk from joining the dancers on the stage of a Louisiana strip club, where he had brought his team. The report also says that Hegseth, who was married at the time, and other members of his management team sexually pursued the organization’s female staffers, whom they divided into two groups—the “party girls” and the “not party girls.” In addition, the report asserts that, under Hegseth’s leadership, the organization became a hostile workplace that ignored serious accusations of impropriety, including an allegation made by a female employee that another employee on Hegseth’s staff had attempted to sexually assault her at the Louisiana strip club. In a separate letter of complaint, which was sent to the organization in late 2015, a different former employee described Hegseth being at a bar in the early-morning hours of May 29, 2015, while on an official tour through Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, drunkenly chanting “Kill All Muslims! Kill All Muslims!”

To sum up, Hegseth is a blackout drunk who sexually harassed female employees and tolerated the same behavior from other members of his team. He’s an accused rapist and alleged bigot. That would normally be a problem for the potential leader of the DoD, but “norm” flew out the window a long time ago. However, Hegseth’s incompetence is disqualifying even if the character issue is moot these days:

Margaret Hoover, a Republican political commentator and political strategist who worked as an adviser to V.F.F. between 2008 and 2010, recently told CNN that she had grave concerns about Hegseth’s ability to run the Pentagon, the largest department in the federal government, given his mismanagement at V.F.F. “I watched him run an organization very poorly, lose the confidence of donors. The organization ultimately folded and was forced to merge with another organization who individuals felt could run and manage funds on behalf of donors more responsibly than he could. That was my experience with him.” Hoover stressed that V.F.F. was an exceedingly small organization, with fewer than ten employees, and a budget of between five million and ten million dollars. She told CNN, “And he couldn’t do that properly, I don’t know how he’s going to run an organization with an eight-hundred-and-fifty-seven-billion-dollar budget and three million individuals.”

Good question, Ms. Hoover.

One amusing aspect of this disgraceful mess: Hegseth allegedly lied to the Trump people and said no skeletons would tumble out of his closet if he were nominated, so they were “blindsided” when the rape accusation and payoff surfaced.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Trump’s transition team was blindsided by the sexual-assault story because Hegseth had failed to disclose anything about it, including the fact that he had paid off his accuser. He also failed to disclose that he had received a copy of the police report in 2021, long before the Monterey police’s recent release of it. The series of damning revelations has reportedly infuriated the transition team. “When we ask, ‘Is there anything else we need to know about?’ that is usually a good time to mention a police report,” a Trump adviser told Rolling Stone. “Obviously he remembered that this all happened and there is no way—I don’t think—he could have believed this wouldn’t come out once he got nominated.”

Well, maybe Hegseth is yet another scumbag following the corporate ethos of an organization led by Donald J. Trump, so he felt no need to disclose anything. If the boss can sexually assault and defame women with impunity and be reelected, why should Hegseth see his own sordid history as an obstacle to an important job?

The truth is, a critical mass in this country despises women and scoffs at basic standards of competence — or else is so indifferent that it amounts to the same thing. That’s not a hot take; it’s been cooling on the windowsill like a rancid pie for decades.

Open thread.

Party BoysPost + Comments (145)

Relentless Positivity Open Thread: No More Handmaids

by Anne Laurie|  November 4, 20245:22 pm| 194 Comments

This post is in: Elections 2024, Kamala Harris for President, Open Threads, Proud to Be A Democrat, Women's Rights Are Human Rights

STOCKPILE - No More Handmaidens

(Mike Luckovich via GoComics.com)

On Saturday, in a fierce show of support for Kamala Harris, thousands of women marched in Washington, D.C. and across the country. ???????????????? pic.twitter.com/qV3HdxIx1F

— Bill Madden (@maddenifico) November 3, 2024

"why do we need an ad telling women that their vote is private"

Meanwhile on Fox: https://t.co/yBXjb2sr8V

— ??Dante Atkins?? (@DanteAtkins) October 31, 2024

When your marriage is rock solid

[image or embed]

— Molly Knight (@mollyknight.bsky.social) November 1, 2024 at 11:08 AM

As I wrote yesterday, "The word reflects a larger tendency of Trump and his followers to see women not as people, but as property of men, especially powerful white men." https://t.co/DNmtrstQm2 https://t.co/Dlhxc6zcuZ

— Amanda Marcotte (@AmandaMarcotte) November 2, 2024

This happened to me in NC last week. The man told us his wife was napping and couldn’t come to the door. https://t.co/NfJ03y4Bgl

— Neera Tanden?? (@neeratanden) November 2, 2024

STOCKPILE - No More Handmaidens 2

(John Deering via GoComics.com)

show full post on front page

This actually tracks, and not just for women. It isn’t so much husbands women fear as people generally knowing they’ve violated community norms. The fusion of politics with religion makes the stakes very high. Extremely hard to stand up against Trump when you’ll be accused of… https://t.co/cZzBidN6lr

— Brent Orrell (@OrrellAEI) October 31, 2024

My wife is from rural central PA. The community is quite stable, lots of great support from neighbors. But the price of inclusion is conformity. Being outside that circle is extremely risky from a psychological standpoint.

— Brent Orrell (@OrrellAEI) October 31, 2024

It is a habit formed in the pews where pastors and other leaders are very concerned about policing theological boundaries. It is a religious sociology applied to politics.

— Brent Orrell (@OrrellAEI) October 31, 2024

This post and the ad it is based on is getting the response it is getting is because being a petty tyrant over at least your family, and then moving that circle outward, is the basis of most of conservative politics. https://t.co/yiz2Flrz2m

— A. Bartaway????????? (@Bartaway) October 30, 2024

I agree with this. A personal anecdote: a female relative who has never voted for Democrats told me today that she was voting for Harris. I asked why. Abortion. Horrified by what she's learned about the state-level bans. https://t.co/o8JuCZC3xP

— Alex גדעון בן װעלװל (@JewishWonk) November 4, 2024

if it turns out that we (harris) win, and that it was due to a shift with women voters, remember that "should women vote?" was absolutely not a question serious people were entertaining in 2016 and it's visible as discourse in 2024. who knows if it'll be enough but it is a thing

— cai (@AnneNotation) November 3, 2024

"Women are not without electoral or political power." https://t.co/AFjDTCXRQo

— Molly Jong-Fast (@MollyJongFast) November 4, 2024

Trump’s hatred of women is bolder and clearer than ever. There’s no turning back now, Republican misogyny has long lost the woman vote. See you next Tuesday, Donald. pic.twitter.com/2BE6waAAbK

— The Lincoln Project (@ProjectLincoln) November 4, 2024

STOCKPILE - No More Handmaidens 1

(Matt Davies via GoComics.com)

Relentless Positivity Open Thread: No More HandmaidsPost + Comments (194)

The Only Poll That Matters…

by Rose Judson|  October 28, 20242:12 pm| 140 Comments

This post is in: Excellent Links, Open Threads, Politics, Women's Rights

…is already in the field. About two weeks ago I started checking in with the University of Florida’s Early Voting tracker website. Back in 2020, the daily updates there offered me a dose of reassurance, and this year is no different. The scholar who’s in charge of the project is Michael McDonald, who notes that as of this morning approximately 43 million of us have voted in the election. Click the embedded post to follow him on Bluesky (you can also find him at the Other Place, but I’m going to try not to embed tweets here when there’s a Bluesky account available):

#earlyvote morning update 10/28: at least 42.9 million people have voted in the 2024 general election 🥳
election.lab.ufl.edu/early-vote/2…

[image or embed]

— Michael McDonald (@electproject.bsky.social) October 28, 2024 at 12:45 PM

The site has a nifty dashboard for parsing data by reported characteristics such as gender, party registration, etc. (Note that not all characteristics are available for all states.) Professor McDonald also has a Substack where he breaks down what he’s seeing in the data, but most of those posts are for paid subscribers only, unfortunately. This post, “Republican Antipathy Toward Early Voting May Haunt Them”, however, isn’t. It’s from October 20th, over a week ago now. It focuses on data out of North Carolina and notes that:

“North Carolina law allows counties to set times and hours for in-person early voting within state guidelines. The 2024 general election schedule of in-person early voting is here. Importantly, counties have the option of holding in-person early voting on the weekends, which the larger Democratic counties opted to do.

“Why didn’t Republican counties do the same? Probably because their election boards when making their plans heeded Donald Trump’s warnings that early voting is fraudulent. But as the unusual surge in Republicans voting the first days of in-person early voting suggest, these decisions were perhaps shortsighted because it cut off eager Republicans from voting over the weekend.”

He also notes that when Republicans are voting in North Carolina, they seem to be more women voters than men (I wonder how many of those Republican ladies are Nikki Haley crossover voters). In fact, early voting data generally shows a much larger gender gap so far this year:

show full post on front page

Here’s data from the states that report voter gender:

UFl early voter data by gender 10/27/24

That’s currently a gap of 10.4% between men who have voted and women who have voted. In 2020, according to the Center for American Women and Politics at Rutgers, the gap was 3.4%. Now, the current gender gap will undoubtedly narrow over the next eight days, as more people vote but that it is so large right now seems . . . interesting.

Some of our fellow commenters highlighted more early vote data that should provide you with some motivation, even if it doesn’t help you sleep better (and anyway, to quote Governor Walz quoting Warren Zevon: we’ll sleep when we’re dead).

First, dm posted this DailyKOS diary with some survey data of people who have already voted. The choice excerpt:

“Here are the polls and the Harris-Trump percentages those early voters have said they voted.

  • ABC/Ipsos: Harris 62-33
  • CNN:  Harris 61-36
  • NYT/Siena: Harris 58-40
  • HarrisX poll: Harris 61-32
  • USAToday/Suffolk: Harris 63-34

That’s 5 polls all showing roughly the same thing . . . That’s an average of 61.2% for Harris, 35% for Trump.”

(Bolding mine.) Within that DailyKOS diary there’s also a link to another data aggregator, TargetSmart, which offers a model of voter partisanship that is 47% Democratic, 44% Republican, and 9% other. So, again: interesting.

Next, Ceci n’est pas mon nym shared the latest article for Today’s Edition, a Substack newsletter run by a writer (and attorney? couldn’t confirm) named Robert Hubbell. Titled “Reasons to be hopeful!”, the article notes the belated turn by the press toward calling MAGA what it is, the lack of attention paid to women’s issues, and, most interestingly, a link to this Vox article about the gender gap in candidate preference in recent swing state polls. Behold this chart:

holy gender gap, batman!

Look at those North Carolina numbers. I hope you Tar Heels will help the rest of us have an early night on the 5th.

Finally, rarely is the question asked: is our white women learning? Apologies for the Newsweek link, but it appears the Rough Beast may only have 51% of white women behind him (as opposed to 56% in 2016 and 57% in 2020):

“This year Trump holds just a 1-point lead among white women, marking the weakest performance in this demographic for any Republican candidate this century, according to CNN political analyst Harry Enten, who cited an average of post-election surveys from 2012-2020 and pre-election surveys this year.

‘He’s doing the worst, if this holds, for a GOP candidate this century among white women,’ said Enten, who previously worked for FiveThirtyEight.”

Again: innnnnnnteresting. We’ll see whether this is all a mirage in eight days. Meanwhile, check in with all the angry ladies you know to make sure they’ve voted or have a plan to vote. This is down to us, it seems.

***

It’s hard to focus on anything other than the election this week, but there’s also a UK budget announcement and a Google earnings call coming on the 30th, plus Halloween, the best holiday, on the 31st. While the thread’s officially open, please do share any more early vote data you’ve seen – commenters make this place what it is! Thanks again to dm and Ceci n’est pas mon nym for the links.

The Only Poll That Matters…Post + Comments (140)

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 177
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - Winter Wren - Helen and Allan Cruickshank Sanctuary
Photo by Winter Wren (3/31/26)
Donate

Election Resources

Voter Registration Info – Find a State
Check Voter Registration by Address
Election Calendar by State

Targeted Fundraising Info & Links

Recent Comments

  • Goku (aka Amerikan Baka) on Tuesday Night Open Thread (Mar 31, 2026 @ 11:24pm)
  • Bupalos on Tuesday Night Open Thread (Mar 31, 2026 @ 11:19pm)
  • NotMax on Tuesday Night Open Thread (Mar 31, 2026 @ 11:13pm)
  • Adam L Silverman on War for Ukraine Day 1,496: The Fourth Anniversary of the Bucha Massacre (Mar 31, 2026 @ 11:13pm)
  • Timill on Tuesday Night Open Thread (Mar 31, 2026 @ 11:12pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Outsmarting Apple iOS 26

Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Order Calendar A
Order Calendar B

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix
Rose Judson (podcast)

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Privacy Manager

Copyright © 2026 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc