For a group of people new to this whole democracy thing, these folks sure seem to learn quick:
Iraqi leaders submitted a draft constitution to the National Assembly just before their self-imposed midnight deadline on Monday, but disagreement with Sunni leaders and other, secular Iraqis left the document incomplete, with fundamental issues still in dispute.
In a legal sleight of hand, the Iraqis decided to give themselves three additional days to close the gaps, despite the requirement in the country’s interim constitution that the document be completed by a deadline, which already had been extended a week. That left some Iraqis on the 275-member National Assembly wondering whether they were still in charge, and some Sunni leaders asserting that the delay was illegal.
And while they may have technically succeeded in adhering to the deadline (the text of the draft can be found here), there are numerous problems still:
At the heart of the dispute was the decision to largely exclude the Sunni leaders from the talks on the constitution, after the failure to meet the first deadline last week. That meant that any agreements struck by the Shiite and Kurdish negotiators were not really complete.
When the Sunnis were finally brought into the negotiations on Monday afternoon, they promptly rejected several of the constitution’s most fundamental provisions.
“There are about 20 issues in there that are unresolved,” said Saleh Mutlak, one of the Sunni leaders.
Despite the confusion, some Iraqi leaders expressed confidence that they would be able to finish the constitution in the next three days. In addition to the unresolved questions on Shiite autonomy, they said the two main disputes were whether the constitution would contain language barring members of Saddam Hussein’s Baath Party from working in the government and how the president and prime minister would be selected.
I was under the impression that the real need for compromise was that in order for the Constitution to be ratified, it had to have approval by numerous different regions within Iraq. I don’t see how this version will meet that standard, as the Sunni bloc is vehemently opposed. Am I missing something, or is my understanding of the ratification process wrong?
