Calpundit states that Bush should not receive any credit (in so many words) for there not being any recent terrorist strikes:
Of course there were no terrorist attacks here this weekend. There never are. You can click here to see graphically just how rare terrorist attacks in the United States are, both pre and post 9/11.
I agree with him- although I might add that I do think there have been attempts or plans, and our military action has disrupted terrorist cells. However, the most important question is, if, in the even there is a terrorist attack on our soil, will Kevin be the first one to point out that you can not really blame Bush for the attack?