• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

President Musk and Trump are both poorly raised, coddled 8 year old boys.

In my day, never was longer.

One of our two political parties is a cult whose leader admires Vladimir Putin.

The “burn-it-down” people are good with that until they become part of the kindling.

Come on, man.

Republicans firmly believe having an abortion is a very personal, very private decision between a woman and J.D. Vance.

“Jesus paying for the sins of everyone is an insult to those who paid for their own sins.”

Since when do we limit our critiques to things we could do better ourselves?

Their boy Ron is an empty plastic cup that will never know pudding.

Oppose, oppose, oppose. do not congratulate. this is not business as usual.

You cannot shame the shameless.

Radicalized white males who support Trump are pitching a tent in the abyss.

Good lord, these people are nuts.

And now I have baud making fun of me. this day can’t get worse.

White supremacy is terrorism.

SCOTUS: It’s not “bribery” unless it comes from the Bribery region of France. Otherwise, it’s merely “sparkling malfeasance”.

We know you aren’t a Democrat but since you seem confused let me help you.

Dear Washington Post, you are the darkness now.

No offense, but this thread hasn’t been about you for quite a while.

The republican speaker is a slippery little devil.

I swear, each month of 2025 will have its own history degree.

They love authoritarianism, but only when they get to be the authoritarians.

It is possible to do the right thing without the promise of a cookie.

We need to vote them all out and restore sane Democratic government.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Nancy Grace, Shrill Harpy

Nancy Grace, Shrill Harpy

by John Cole|  June 15, 20057:02 pm| 12 Comments

This post is in: General Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

I see the always vile Nancy Grace is up to her usual bullshit:

“Boy, do I need a shrink,” Grace said on her show, where she said Jackson was found “not guilty, by reason of celebrity.”

She conducted a contentious argument with Paul Rodriguez, foreman of the Jackson jury.

“When you have so many little boys coming in and saying, `this happened to me,’ you got a $20 million settlement to make one kid go away, a $2 million settlement to make another kid go away, you got a grown man sleeping with little boys,” she said. “Hello!!”

Rodriguez attempted a reply, but was cut off after two words.

“How do you explain this guy’s sleeping with a 13-year-old boy 365 nights in their underwear?” she asked.

Rodriguez explained that the jury did not have enough evidence to convict Jackson beyond a reasonable doubt in the case before them.

Grace later pressed Rodriguez for his personal view on what Jackson did with boys in his bed. Rodriguez said he only wanted to talk about the evidence set before the jury.

“I was very stunned to hear a juror refuse to state what he thought Jackson does in bed with all of his line of little boys, say he didn’t want to stick his neck out by telling what he believed,” she said. “I mean, isn’t that the point of the justice system, to do what you believe in, what you think is right, for Pete’s sake?”

Someone wanna take a styab at explaining to this nutjob what the real purpose of the law is and how jury trials really work? You can even toss in big words like ‘jury instructions.’

Justice is now doing what you believe in, not following the all.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « The State of the Debate
Next Post: Heh »

Reader Interactions

12Comments

  1. 1.

    Steven

    June 15, 2005 at 7:26 pm

    I used to watch CNN for news. Now I just don’t watch. I’m hopeful it will just go away.

  2. 2.

    Nathan Lanier

    June 15, 2005 at 7:47 pm

    Well, they got rid of Bill Hemmer. That’s a start.

  3. 3.

    Mike S

    June 15, 2005 at 7:55 pm

    I hate that woman with a passion. In a just world she would be unemployed, not raging on a cable channel. The rule of law means nothing to her and the idea of reasonable doubt offends her.

    She has been cited for prosecutorial misconduct 3 times and there will surely be more to follow.

    One case she did something that might be familiar to some. She suborned perjury from a cop, aledgedly.

    The most recent of those admonitions came last week, when a published opinion from the U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals concurred with lower court findings that Grace had “played fast and loose” with her ethical duties as a prosecutor in a 1990 triple-murder case. The lower courts had admonished Grace for failing to disclose the existence of other suspects in the case and for knowingly allowing a police detective to testify falsely regarding the matter. The appeals court, however, also concurred that Grace’s misconduct did not affect the outcome of the case.

    Writing for a unanimous three-judge panel, Justice William H. Pryor Jr. wrote that the lower courts were right to uphold the defendant’s conviction “despite the failure of the prosecutor to fulfill her responsibilities.”

  4. 4.

    tim

    June 15, 2005 at 7:57 pm

    With hard work and perseverance on the part of folks like Grace (shudder… she should change her name), the entire nation will eventually be just like Texas, where 41 year old black “Boys” can be beaten and left on fire ant mounds with a slap on the wrist. If you’re a good (white) kid.

  5. 5.

    Harley

    June 15, 2005 at 8:32 pm

    No need to explain. And one hopes that Grace, at some point, will stop pimping the tragic death of her own husband in order to bolster her bona fides. (“I’m a crime victim, myself” she sez. Over and over again.)

  6. 6.

    norbizness

    June 15, 2005 at 8:57 pm

    “Someone wanna take a stab at explaining to this nutjob what the real purpose of the law is and how jury trials really work?”

    Ummm.. fuck no! I value my skin and its not being eaten!

  7. 7.

    ppgaz

    June 15, 2005 at 11:41 pm

    C’mon, troops. Nancy Grace is just another media huckster. She is there for ratings. Who cares what she says or does?

  8. 8.

    Jon H

    June 15, 2005 at 11:46 pm

    I have to say this for Fox News: at least they don’t waste airtime running warmed-over celebrity interviews and biographies, like CNN and MSNBC do.

    Those two networks are pretty much worthless on the weekends, for that reason alone.

  9. 9.

    Compuglobalhypermeganet

    June 16, 2005 at 2:25 am

    Justice is now doing what you believe in, not following the all.

    That’s what 3 decades of judicial activism breeds, I guess. Shameful. CNN should find another flim-flammer, although NG will no doubt spike in popularity after this trial.

  10. 10.

    Rella C

    June 27, 2005 at 2:18 pm

    I watch Nancy Grace everyday and enjoy it. This world of full of reality shows or watching depressing news programs in it great and even entertaining to see what she will do or say each day. Lighten up people.

  11. 11.

    gaby8

    July 7, 2005 at 11:38 pm

    Why does Nancy Grace misrepresent her boy friend death?
    Read This!

    Nancy Grace, 47, commentator for Court TV.
    A

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. Balloon Juice says:
    February 2, 2006 at 9:24 am

    […] Longtime readers are aware of my complete hatred of “Hang ‘em High” Nancy Grace, the idiot former prosecutor who has never found a defendant innocent, and does everything she can to prejudice the public in her show trials on CNN (past posts on the disgusting Grace can be found here, here, here, here, here, and here). […]

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - Winter Wren - North of Quebec City (part 2 of 3) - Cap Tourmente and on the way to Tadoussac 4
Image by Winter Wren (5/16/25)

Recent Comments

  • Redshift on Totally Out of the Loop Open Thread (May 16, 2025 @ 11:06pm)
  • mvr on Totally Out of the Loop Open Thread (May 16, 2025 @ 11:05pm)
  • FastEdD on Totally Out of the Loop Open Thread (May 16, 2025 @ 11:04pm)
  • Chacal Charles Calthrop on Totally Out of the Loop Open Thread (May 16, 2025 @ 11:04pm)
  • JoyceH on Totally Out of the Loop Open Thread (May 16, 2025 @ 11:04pm)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!