• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

The party of Reagan has become the party of Putin.

And now I have baud making fun of me. this day can’t get worse.

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

It’s always darkest before the other shoe drops.

Infrastructure week. at last.

The republican caucus is already covering themselves with something, and it’s not glory.

This has so much WTF written all over it that it is hard to comprehend.

No one could have predicted…

Usually wrong but never in doubt

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires

The GOP couldn’t organize an orgy in a whorehouse with a fist full of 50s.

We are builders in a constant struggle with destroyers. let’s win this.

When do we start airlifting the women and children out of Texas?

Damn right I heard that as a threat.

People are complicated. Love is not.

Optimism opens the door to great things.

Insiders who complain to politico: please report to the white house office of shut the fuck up.

This blog will pay for itself.

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Roe isn’t about choice, it’s about freedom.

“Squeaker” McCarthy

Make the republican party small enough to drown in a bathtub.

Seems like a complicated subject, have you tried yelling at it?

“Can i answer the question? No you can not!”

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Blog Spats

Blog Spats

by John Cole|  October 27, 20055:05 pm| 14 Comments

This post is in: Politics, Blogospheric Navel-Gazing

FacebookTweetEmail

This isn’t really a blog fight, but Kos and Armando are not seeing eye to eye on the Miers withdrawal. Says Kos:

It seems to me that Miers wasn’t done in from a lack of conservative cred as the wingers want to believe. Bush was convinced she was like him and would’ve fought for her all the way through. She was done in from simple incompetence. Her responses to committee questions betrayed a complete lack of understanding of constitutional law. Her meager writings were incoherent. She was unable to articulate competence in meetings with senators.

Give Miers the same set of facts but with Judge Roberts’ obvious competence on legal issues, and she gets confirmed. She wasn’t done in because the crazies flipped. She was done in because she simply wasn’t competent to sit on the High Court and it was so painfully obvious.

Armando replies:

Below kos posits that Miers’ big problem was her lack of competence. I disagree with that. I believe that Miers’ problem was her lack of Wingnut credentials, especially on being anti-choice and anti-Roe. And the last straw was her 1993 speech becoming known.

Pretty clearly I agree with Kos, but if all Armando is saying is that the FINAL straw was her 1993 speech, I can still agree with that to some extent. However, the vast majority of people who opposed Miers did so well in advance of any knowledge of her 1993 speech, and did so because she was simply unqualified, unprepared, and not fit for the job. I think everyone thought she would vote against Roe, so the social cons could be mollified temporarily.

The 1993 speech may have tipped the scales for some, but the bulk of the opposition (some 70% of bloggers who weighed in at NZ Bear’s prior to the uncovering of the ’93 speech were opposed to her) was for a number of reasons similar to what I have stated- whether it be her inability to pay her dues to the Bar, her inability to get questions answered appropriately, her poor performance in Senate meetings, and so on.

And one last thing- she couldn’t even get her revised questionnaire in on time last night. She simply was not the right person for the job.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « A Fond Farewell
Next Post: Withholding Documents? »

Reader Interactions

14Comments

  1. 1.

    gorillagogo

    October 27, 2005 at 5:24 pm

    John

    I don’t think any one side is right in this food fight. I think too many groups opposed Miers, period.

  2. 2.

    oscar wilde

    October 27, 2005 at 5:25 pm

    It would appear that she is not the only person who isn’t right for the job.

  3. 3.

    Jack Roy

    October 27, 2005 at 5:25 pm

    Not to bring it too close to home, but who was it who was just today disputing your supposition that it was her incompetence that doomed her? Some blogger lamenting that as everyone else seemed to care only about the 1993 speech, “I am the one with the bizarre worldview” that competence matters?

    Just sayin’.

  4. 4.

    Steve

    October 27, 2005 at 5:29 pm

    You’re projecting, John. Conservatives were all over the map on this one. Some supported her because she would overturn Roe, regardless of what her judicial philosophy might turn out to be. Some opposed her because they weren’t convinced she would overturn Roe. Some supported her because they trusted the President to nominate someone with an originalist judicial philosophy. Some opposed her because they weren’t convinced she had an originalist judicial philosophy.

    There are a lot of people out there who want a nominee who is openly and unabashedly against Roe, and they won’t settle for anything less. That doesn’t mean everyone who opposed the nomination fell into this category, but it’s an important issue.

    You might have seen that Dobson flip-flopped today by saying, based on the 1993 speech, he no longer feels he could have supported the nomination and he’s glad she withdrew. That’s pretty good evidence that Armando was right. Of course, you can’t say that any one reason was the motivator for every single person, but you can try and identify what you see as the main cause.

    Would conservatives have supported a known moderate if they were brilliant and had an outstanding resume? Many of them would not; that’s not what they voted for in 2004. Would conservatives have supported a mediocre nominee if there was solid evidence that they would produce conservative results? Not all, of course, but I feel safe in opining that there would have been more enthusiasm for the latter nominee than the former.

    The key is not the reason why some people opposed her all along. The key is what made people like Dobson switch from supporters to opponents, and the answer is obviously the 1993 speech. She was too squishy on abortion to pass the right-wing litmus test that the right wing always denies having.

  5. 5.

    Mike S

    October 27, 2005 at 5:32 pm

    Polling report showed the country divided on her. But even worse was that 50% were disapointed with the fact that he nominated her while 40% were pleased.

  6. 6.

    oscar wilde

    October 27, 2005 at 5:41 pm

    As an outsider looking in,with no partisan views whatsoever, it does strike me rather plainly, an incompetent man nominated an incompetent woman.
    At the end of the day, that is the top and bottom it

  7. 7.

    oscar wilde

    October 27, 2005 at 5:42 pm

    typo.
    top and bottom of it

  8. 8.

    Mr Furious

    October 27, 2005 at 6:58 pm

    I think that kos, you and I are on the same page. Though Armondo is correct that he difference-maker WAS the speech that came out this week. I don’t think the far right was exactly enthused with her, and that did it for them. The combination of that speech casting doubt on her conservative bonafides with the overwhelming display of mediocrity to downright incompetence over the last week or two just resluted in a buffet of choices to offer cover to those who would oppose her, but would otherwise not buck the President.

  9. 9.

    Bob Davis

    October 27, 2005 at 7:20 pm

    She simply was not the right person for the job.

    But she is the right person to go back to heading up the search committee for the next attempt at an appointee.

  10. 10.

    Kimmitt

    October 27, 2005 at 8:10 pm

    The dynamic would have been different if Bush had nominated an unqualified wingnut crony. Not for Cole, but for the Republican Party as a whole.

  11. 11.

    pleonastic piranha

    October 27, 2005 at 10:45 pm

    i agree with steve; conservatives were all over the map as to why they were opposed to her; it seems silly to me to try and shoehorn them all under the umbrella of one reason for the opposition.

    she couldn’t even get her revised questionnaire in on time last night

    in her defense: since she undoubtedly knew she was going to withdraw today, handing in the questionnaire would have been moot. had i known about it, i would have suspected that she was going to withdraw today.

  12. 12.

    Steve S

    October 28, 2005 at 12:16 am

    The fact remains that when you were complaining about her potential incompetence, you were called a sexist by Laura Bush.

    It wasn’t until Miers lost the support of the Whackadoodle wing that she withdrew. As I pointed out earlier, on Wednesday was the day that even Dobson came out opposed to her.

    there is no coincidence here.

  13. 13.

    Mike

    October 28, 2005 at 11:42 am

    Who cares why she withdrew or for what reasons. She’s gone and that is good for the country. If Pres Bush is smart, he will wait a few weeks to nominate a true conservative so that the public can forget about what was said in the whole Meirs mess. The public and media have short memories, so there is no reason why the we cannot demand a fair hearing and an up or down vote on the President’s conservative nominee. The country needs this to correct the court’s past mistakes in the last thirty years.

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. SayUncle » Blog Archive » I’ve seen the moonbat king says:
    October 28, 2005 at 9:01 am

    […] And I am speechless. Something isn’t right in the world when the reasonable party in a debate is Kos. […]

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • The Dark Avenger on Medium Cool – Agatha Christie & Dorothy Sayers, Part III (Mar 26, 2023 @ 8:34pm)
  • Shalimar on Sunday Evening Open Thread: The GOP, Now A Full-Scale Mafia (Mar 26, 2023 @ 8:34pm)
  • CaseyL on Medium Cool – Agatha Christie & Dorothy Sayers, Part III (Mar 26, 2023 @ 8:32pm)
  • schrodingers_cat on Medium Cool – Agatha Christie & Dorothy Sayers, Part III (Mar 26, 2023 @ 8:32pm)
  • WaterGirl on Sunday Evening Open Thread: The GOP, Now A Full-Scale Mafia (Mar 26, 2023 @ 8:31pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!