• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Russian mouthpiece, go fuck yourself.

Let the trolls come, and then ignore them. that’s the worst thing you can do to a troll.

They are not red states to be hated; they are voter suppression states to be fixed.

The line between political reporting and fan fiction continues to blur.

Reality always gets a vote in the end.

One lie, alone, tears the fabric of reality.

I desperately hope that, yet again, i am wrong.

Not so fun when the rabbit gets the gun, is it?

T R E 4 5 O N

I like political parties that aren’t owned by foreign adversaries.

This blog will pay for itself.

“In this country American means white. everybody else has to hyphenate.”

The “burn-it-down” people are good with that until they become part of the kindling.

He wakes up lying, and he lies all day.

“Alexa, change the president.”

We do not need to pander to people who do not like what we stand for.

“They all knew.”

Hell hath no fury like a farmer bankrupted.

Roe is not about choice. It is about freedom.

Authoritarian republicans are opposed to freedom for the rest of us.

Text STOP to opt out of updates on war plans.

The republican speaker is a slippery little devil.

She burned that motherfucker down, and I am so here for it. Thank you, Caroline Kennedy.

This is dead girl, live boy, a goat, two wetsuits and a dildo territory.  oh, and pink furry handcuffs.

Mobile Menu

  • 4 Directions VA 2025 Raffle
  • 2025 Activism
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Foreign Affairs / War / Breaking

Breaking

by Tim F|  April 2, 20071:03 pm| 120 Comments

This post is in: War

FacebookTweetEmail

Another sad milestone in the slow degradation of our armed forces. If anybody has not yet recalibrated their assumptions about Iraq, here are a few pointers:

* The “surge” will not go on because it cannot go on. Sooner rather than later there will be no more wounded, stop-lossed and unrested troops left to send to Iraq.
* Staying in Iraq by definition means leaving America open to external threats. We have already cannibalized our reserve troops, making it impossible to respond to any new threats unless al Qaeda fields a blue water navy. Staying now just prolongs the repair time before our army is ready to fight again.
* We cannot win in Iraq. The “surge” has just squeezed the violence to places where we are not surging, we lack the forces to hold regions that we clear and even that effect will end when we draw down the “surge” troops.

Some of these points may be open to debate, but as far as I can tell the opposing arguments are mostly based on misinformation and gross distortions of fact (see McCain, John). Barring a game changer along the lines of the arrival of the 12th Imam or the Spanish Flu our narrative is already writ in stone. It’s just a matter of when.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « KMBA Watch
Next Post: Passover/NCAA Thread »

Reader Interactions

120Comments

  1. 1.

    Davebo

    April 2, 2007 at 1:08 pm

    When considering the total cost of this cluster fuck of a war we have to add in the 400 to 600 billion we’ll be spending to repair/replace equipment used in Iraq as well as the millions in ongoing disability payments and medical care to those brave service members returning home with broken bodies and souls.

    To be blunt, we are already at the 1 trillion dollar mark on this blunder.

    It’s time to cut our losses, support our troops with more than chinese manufactured magnets, and get the hell out of Iraq.

  2. 2.

    Perry Como

    April 2, 2007 at 1:16 pm

    im in ur military, depleting ur d00ds

  3. 3.

    Bubblegum Tate

    April 2, 2007 at 1:19 pm

    We cannot win in Iraq.

    Oh, but we are winning in Iraq, moonbat! In fact, we’ve basically already won, we’re just tying up the loose ends–meanwhile, you sit at home and cheer for America’s defeat.

    Sorry…just had to get the obligatory voice from wingnutville out of the way.

  4. 4.

    Zombie Santa Claus

    April 2, 2007 at 1:27 pm

    Clinton fucked up way worse than this. Haven’t any of you moonbats seen “Black Hawk Down”?

  5. 5.

    28 Percent

    April 2, 2007 at 1:28 pm

    That is so wrong. How are you helping our soldiers you are only hurting htem by saying you do not believe our Army is the best. What do they have to be proud of if they cannot do whatever it takes to show how great America is? Especially if we lose to insurgents who are not an Army we beat their army now we can not beat a bunch of people wh just shoot at us and hide. It is telling the world you can do anything if you can hide where we can not find you! If there is a timetable then they will just wait and hide until the time is up and you may think it is like when you play hide-and-go-seek with a kid and let them hide while you fold laundry and watch some TV in peace and quiet until they get tired of hiding and just go play in their rooms but it is not, because this is not a game and if we do not play to win we will be LOSERS! You want to make our brave Soldiers who make sacrifices LOSERS after they have given somuch you just want them to feel bad and keep them from knowing that they won and America is the best. Whether you care or not it is important to some why you do not understand this I do not know.

  6. 6.

    ed

    April 2, 2007 at 1:31 pm

    Dear 28%:

    Spoofing is a form of vandalism. And you’re not very good at it.

  7. 7.

    28 Percent

    April 2, 2007 at 1:34 pm

    Whatever you can not answer my argument so you use ad-hominem attacks. It just goes to show that you know that I have the TRUTH on my side.

  8. 8.

    sfHeath

    April 2, 2007 at 1:37 pm

    I first thought 28 Percent was a spoof (I can’t remember the names of all the spoofers in these comments) but the phrase “brave Soldiers who make sacrifices” hit me in the gut and it was no longer funny. Now I return to outrage at the CiC (and at Congress for letting it happen) for sending these men and women off on an undersupported, understaffed, hopeless mission that (even if “successful”) will – at this point – make even more enemies for the USA. How is that worth asking for our soldiers’ sacrifices?

  9. 9.

    Chad N. Freude

    April 2, 2007 at 1:40 pm

    Staying in Iraq by definition means leaving America open to external threats.

    This is what gets to me the most. “We’re fighting them over there so we don’t have to fight them over here.” Right, as long as we keep them busy building IEDs they won’t have the time or the people to slip into the US and, oh, I don’t know, set off a dirty bomb maybe. As long as we pour all of our resources into the whack-a-mole war, they won’t have the resources to, oh, I don’t know, slip a nuclear device through a seaport that we aren’t protecting because the money and personnel are all in Iraq.

    How can the Bush Patrol not understand this? But maybe, God help us, this is really the administration of the Manchurian Candidate, and they do.

  10. 10.

    Chad N. Freude

    April 2, 2007 at 1:45 pm

    Clinton fucked up way worse than this. Haven’t any of you moonbats seen “Black Hawk Down”?

    I hope this is a spoof, but in case it’s not:

    He certainly did. Just a few disastrous guys-on-horseback-with-rifles episodes and Clinton stopped pouring money and manpower into a non-Western tribal ethnic war.

  11. 11.

    Chad N. Freude

    April 2, 2007 at 1:46 pm

    Could we kind of ignore 28?

  12. 12.

    Zombie Santa Claus

    April 2, 2007 at 1:49 pm

    Could we kind of ignore 28?

    Sorry, son. This blog’s Ground Zero of the Spoofosphere. We were here long before you, and we have too many IPs for them to get rid of us even if they wanted to.

  13. 13.

    Jake

    April 2, 2007 at 1:50 pm

    I wonder how this goes with Bush’s promise to protect traditional marriage and family. The last time I checked prolonged deployments are not conducive to happy, healthy one mommy, one daddy families.

  14. 14.

    Zombie Santa Claus

    April 2, 2007 at 1:50 pm

    I hope this is a spoof, but in case it’s not:

    You’re pretty new around here, fella, so let me suggest that you consider my name, click on the link, and ask yourself if anyone the slightest bit serious would ever post like this.

  15. 15.

    Zombie Santa Claus

    April 2, 2007 at 1:51 pm

    I wonder how this goes with Bush’s promise to protect traditional marriage and family. The last time I checked prolonged deployments are not conducive to happy, healthy one mommy, one daddy families.

    At least Bush has a PLAN to fuck up American families. What’s the Democrats’ alternative?

  16. 16.

    Fruitbat Jones

    April 2, 2007 at 1:53 pm

    we have too many IPs for them to get rid of us

    I plead The Schultz on this one.

    Oh…and Clinton f’ed up our military. Messed it up good. So bad, in fact, that Hannity even acknowledges it. What a handsome man.

  17. 17.

    Jonathan

    April 2, 2007 at 1:53 pm

    tinyurl.com/2uwqn3

    In January, we estimated that the true cost of the Iraq war could reach $2 trillion, a figure that seemed shockingly high. But since that time, the cost of the war – in both blood and money – has risen even faster than our projections anticipated. More than 2,500 American troops have died and close to 20,000 have been wounded since Operation Iraqi Freedom began. And the $2 trillion number – the sum of the current and future budgetary costs along with the economic impact of lives lost, jobs interrupted and oil prices driven higher by political uncertainty in the Middle East – now seems low.

    One source of difficulty in getting an accurate picture of the direct cost of prosecuting the war is the way the government does its accounting. With “cash accounting,” income and expenses are recorded when payments are actually made – for example, what you pay off on your credit card today – not the amount outstanding. By contrast, with “accrual accounting,” income and expenses are recorded when the commitment is made. But, as Representative Jim Cooper, Democrat of Tennessee, notes, “The budget of the United States uses cash accounting, and only the tiniest businesses in America are even allowed to use cash accounting. Why? Because it gives you a very distorted picture.”

    The distortion is particularly acute in the case of the Iraq war. The cash costs of feeding, housing, transporting and equipping U.S. troops, paying for reconstruction costs, repairs and replacement parts and training Iraqi forces are just the tip of an enormous iceberg. Costs incurred, but not yet paid, dwarf what is being spent now – even when future anticipated outlays are converted back into 2006 dollars.

    More:

  18. 18.

    Zombie Santa Claus

    April 2, 2007 at 1:54 pm

    Oh…and Clinton f’ed up our military. Messed it up good. So bad, in fact, that Hannity even acknowledges it. What a handsome man.

    He almost let teh gayz in. Unforgivable!

  19. 19.

    Darrell, D'Souza, Delay and Strauss

    April 2, 2007 at 1:55 pm

    While Talibani works on dragging the Shia out of Kirkuk, Al-Sistani says screw the Baathists

    We’re just a few walks through the market to victory…

    Alas, there’s always a silver lining. It’ll be at least a generation before we get into another preventive ground war, and by then we’ll just be using drones and robots.

  20. 20.

    gex

    April 2, 2007 at 1:56 pm

    Bubblegum Tate,

    Valiant effort, but the current political climate has taught me one thing – even the most brilliant satirist cannot write a post that will be more extreme than the true 28%ers.

  21. 21.

    Chad N. Freude

    April 2, 2007 at 1:57 pm

    consider my name, click on the link, and ask yourself if anyone the slightest bit serious would ever post like this.

    Sorry, Dude. But around here, sometimes it’s hard to tell. Anyway,

    I hope this is a spoof

    My hope is realized.

    BTW ZoSaCl, re 28, there are spoofs that demonstrate a modicum of sarcastic wit and spoofs that are simply obnoxious noise. I’ll engage the former (and sometimes be taken in by them, but I’m still new here) but I prefer to ignore the latter.

  22. 22.

    gex

    April 2, 2007 at 1:58 pm

    At least Bush has a PLAN to fuck up American families. What’s the Democrats’ alternative?

    Running a bunch of presidential candidates with only one marriage a piece?

  23. 23.

    Chad N. Freude

    April 2, 2007 at 2:00 pm

    At least Bush has a PLAN to fuck up American families. What’s the Democrats’ alternative?

    Gay marriage.

  24. 24.

    Perry Como

    April 2, 2007 at 2:01 pm

    tinyurl.com/2uwqn3

    Like we’re supposed to believe some far left radicals like tinyurl.com.

  25. 25.

    Chad N. Freude

    April 2, 2007 at 2:03 pm

    Like we’re supposed to believe some far left radicals like tinyurl.com.

    Harvard!! Yale would never publish such subversive defeatist lies.

  26. 26.

    Fecapult

    April 2, 2007 at 2:04 pm

    BTW ZoSaCl, re 28, there are spoofs that demonstrate a modicum of sarcastic wit and spoofs that are simply obnoxious noise. I’ll engage the former (and sometimes be taken in by them, but I’m still new here) but I prefer to ignore the latter.

    Spoof or not, I’m fairly amused.

    Perhaps we could win if we were the better hiders… :)

  27. 27.

    28 Percent

    April 2, 2007 at 2:07 pm

    Valiant effort, but the current political climate has taught me one thing – even the most brilliant satirist cannot write a post that will be more extreme than the true 28%ers.

    This may be true I do not know but I think that if I wrote that if we only outlawed abortion we would have so many more poor young people to join the army and go kill people and get killed and maimed and we cannot stop this because that would hurt the soldiers feelings and if we did this we would finally stop being a Culture of Death that the LIBERALS here would just scream about how stupid and awful I am. Stupid heh go figure how stupid you have to be to say I cannot tell if you are a spoof or not but if you are a spoof you are a bad one and yet they do.

  28. 28.

    Zombie Santa Claus

    April 2, 2007 at 2:14 pm

    Sorry, Dude. But around here, sometimes it’s hard to tell.

    True. We have a lot of friendly-fire mishaps on this blog. That goes with the territory when you’re spoofing, though.

    BTW ZoSaCl, re 28, there are spoofs that demonstrate a modicum of sarcastic wit and spoofs that are simply obnoxious noise. I’ll engage the former (and sometimes be taken in by them, but I’m still new here) but I prefer to ignore the latter.

    Well, before I outed myself and picked this ridiculous name, I considered myself a deep-cover spoof. Had to be believable enough to draw out the moronic wingnuts. Nowadays, that’s behind me, but I have no problem with obvious spoofs like 28% and Darrell keeping up the good work, fighting the good fight so I can take it easy and come up with bizarre crap about The War on Christmas instead.

    Gay marriage.

    Touche.

    Running a bunch of presidential candidates with only one marriage a piece?

    The GOP’s family values are so superior, they have to start two or three families apiece. Meanwhile, feeble Democrat parents can’t even plan a second family. Yet I’m supposed to trust these people with running two wars AND an invasion of Iran?

  29. 29.

    Zombie Santa Claus

    April 2, 2007 at 2:17 pm

    This may be true I do not know but I think that if I wrote that if we only outlawed abortion we would have so many more poor young people to join the army and go kill people and get killed and maimed and we cannot stop this because that would hurt the soldiers feelings and if we did this we would finally stop being a Culture of Death that the LIBERALS here would just scream about how stupid and awful I am. Stupid heh go figure how stupid you have to be to say I cannot tell if you are a spoof or not but if you are a spoof you are a bad one and yet they do.

    See, personally I think this is pretty good. I like the disjointed, rambling, tirade-style inanity. It’s almost like a prose version of BIRDZILLA.

  30. 30.

    Davebo

    April 2, 2007 at 2:19 pm

    Raed comments on McCain’s shopping trip.

    Sort of shrill for an Iraqi I guess but…

    raedinthemiddle.blogspot.com/2007/04/dear-john.html

  31. 31.

    Chad N. Freude

    April 2, 2007 at 2:26 pm

    Gay marriage.

    Touche.

    Shouldn’t that be “Tushy”?

  32. 32.

    Jake

    April 2, 2007 at 2:27 pm

    The GOP’s family values are so superior, they have to start two or three families apiece. Meanwhile, feeble Democrat parents can’t even plan a second family. Yet I’m supposed to trust these people with running two wars AND an invasion of Iran?

    Nice try ZSC but it is a well known fact that Democrats don’t have families. They have weird commune/hive set ups that are run by any number of promiscous “matriarchs” who copulate with wandering tribes of patcholi smeared Birkenstock wearing males and raise the resulting off-spring in large pens. Once the male offspring (colts) learn to walk they are sent to roam with their fathers.

    Of course, because the Libs hate life they tend to use birth control and so far their numbers haven’t gotten out of control.

  33. 33.

    Zombie Santa Claus

    April 2, 2007 at 2:34 pm

    Shouldn’t that be “Tushy”?

    No, I ain’t gay. I just ain’t. Mrs. Claus and I have an understanding, but it don’t involve none of that.

    Nice try ZSC but it is a well known fact that Democrats don’t have families. They have weird commune/hive set ups that are run by any number of promiscous “matriarchs” who copulate with wandering tribes of patcholi smeared Birkenstock wearing males and raise the resulting off-spring in large pens. Once the male offspring (colts) learn to walk they are sent to roam with their fathers.

    Of course, because the Libs hate life they tend to use birth control and so far their numbers haven’t gotten out of control.

    I’m hoping that President Huckabee or Brownback or whoever figures out a more permanent solution to this infestation. States like Vermont and California are overrun with clusters like these.

  34. 34.

    cleek

    April 2, 2007 at 2:41 pm

    Stupid heh go figure how stupid you have to be to say I cannot tell if you are a spoof or not but if you are a spoof you are a bad one and yet they do.

    i ask that we all remove our hats and observe a moment of silence for all the pronouns needlessly slaughtered in the quoted text.

  35. 35.

    Zombie Santa Claus

    April 2, 2007 at 2:50 pm

    i ask that we all remove our hats and observe a moment of silence for all the pronouns needlessly slaughtered in the quoted text.

    They fought and died for America, for freedom.

  36. 36.

    demimondian

    April 2, 2007 at 3:01 pm

    Um, Chad — posting at BJuice is as much performance art as it is bloviating. Sometimes more.

    Trust me…you can trust me. Or any of us.

    BWAHAHAHAHA!

  37. 37.

    Perry Como

    April 2, 2007 at 3:02 pm

    I see a whole army of pronouns here in defiance of tyranny! You have come to fight as free pronouns. And free pronouns you are! What will you do without freedom? Will you fight?

    Fight and you may die. Run and you will live at least a while. And dying in your bed many years from now, would you be willing to trade all the days from this day to that for one chance, just one chance, to come back here as young pronouns and tell our adjectives that they may take our lives but they will never take our freedom!

  38. 38.

    Chad N. Freude

    April 2, 2007 at 3:11 pm

    it is a well known fact that Democrats don’t have families

    Not true. The whole world is family.

    posting at BJuice is as much performance art as it is bloviating.

    I don’t want to be rude (which probably disqualifies me from posting here), but I can’t resist this: Oh, bloviate me!

    pronouns [fought for] freedom

    But because pronouns are sometimes ambiguous, they can’t serve in the military.

  39. 39.

    Chad N. Freude

    April 2, 2007 at 3:12 pm

    No, I ain’t gay. I just ain’t. Mrs. Claus and I have an understanding, but it don’t involve none of that.

    Take it easy, you look a little Haggard.

  40. 40.

    Jake

    April 2, 2007 at 3:16 pm

    Take it easy, you look a little Haggard.

    That Foley catheter keeps him up at night.

    OT: Under normal circumstances this story wouldn’t make me say “uh oh.” Now, if a young blonde woman goes missing in Iran you’ll know the shit is about to hit.

  41. 41.

    28 Percent

    April 2, 2007 at 3:16 pm

    Perhaps we could win if we were the better hiders…

    We are winning they should lose because they hide. If Israel had done what God told them too in Numbers (be sure to read all the comments they will make you think) and wiped out everybody then we would not have any problems witht he middle east today but they did not. So the jews have allowed terrorism ot exist but I do not blame them really I am only saying what is true. Now we have to fight because peace in the middle east is a sign of the Anti-Christ. We have to fight the Anti-Christ because we are God’s nation even though he will bring about the end times which are good because then LIBERALS you will all see how wrong you were and how we won, so it would be good if the anti-christ showed up. I think at least it would be exciting. Because then we would win and not even you peace-mongers could take that victory away no matter how hard you tryed. But I will be sad that you will not be saved too, at least a little bit maybe.

  42. 42.

    Andrew

    April 2, 2007 at 3:22 pm

    Chad is just a spoof who is spoofing ignorance of spoofers.

    You have all been had.

  43. 43.

    Chad N. Freude

    April 2, 2007 at 3:23 pm

    Chad is just a spoof who is spoofing ignorance of spoofers.

    Cute.

  44. 44.

    Face

    April 2, 2007 at 3:24 pm

    OT: Under normal circumstances this story wouldn’t make me say “uh oh.”

    It should. Watch this story just blow up by the end of the week. Fox will lead with this tonite, and it will get bigger and bigger.

    Any….and I mean any…way to connect the U.S. with Iran beligerence (real or imaginary, the righties dont care)…

  45. 45.

    Andrew

    April 2, 2007 at 3:29 pm

    Cute.

    … as a button!

  46. 46.

    Perry Como

    April 2, 2007 at 3:35 pm

    OT: Under normal circumstances this story wouldn’t make me say “uh oh.” Now, if a young blonde woman goes missing in Iran you’ll know the shit is about to hit.

    If the Iranians picked this guy up as a suspected spy, the Geneva Conventions wouldn’t apply, right? If the Iranians used unconventional interrogation techniques (like water boarding) would the US have any moral authority to criticize the Iranians?

  47. 47.

    Chad N. Freude

    April 2, 2007 at 3:40 pm

    If the Iranians used unconventional interrogation techniques (like water boarding) would the US have any moral authority to criticize the Iranians?

    Of course we would! We have God on our side and really great lawyers to parse out the differences between our behavior and theirs.

  48. 48.

    scarshapedstar

    April 2, 2007 at 3:45 pm

    We cannot win in Iraq. The “surge” has just squeezed the violence to places where we are not surging, we lack the forces to hold regions that we clear and even that effect will end when we draw down the “surge” troops.

    Yeah, sure, cut and run and let Them think They’ve won. We cannot allow a thought gap! Currently the only reason They don’t know They’ve won is that we have secret mind control devices installed in the Green Zone.

    NEVER FORGET

  49. 49.

    Tsulagi

    April 2, 2007 at 3:46 pm

    If the Iranians picked this guy up as a suspected spy, the Geneva Conventions wouldn’t apply, right?

    It depends on whether it’s Jesus or Mohammed telling you Geneva Conventions don’t apply, and how quaint you view them.

  50. 50.

    Krista

    April 2, 2007 at 3:53 pm

    pronouns [fought for] freedom

    But because pronouns are sometimes ambiguous, they can’t serve in the military.

    Contender for POTD. Nicely done, sir!

  51. 51.

    Jake

    April 2, 2007 at 4:00 pm

    If the Iranians used unconventional interrogation techniques (like water boarding) would the US have any moral authority to criticize the Iranians?

    I believe this was an argument put forward by McMaverick (or one of the Maverettes) back when they were against Unconventional Interrogation Techniques (TM). We should be nice to their guys when we capture them so they’ll be nice to our guys. Of course, since we’ve never had an official list of UITs the US could always say whatever an enemy did to a prisoner Shocks the Conscience or whatever the new standard is these days.

  52. 52.

    ThymeZone

    April 2, 2007 at 4:00 pm

    We have God on our side and really great lawyers comedians to parse out the differences between our behavior and theirs.

    Heh.

  53. 53.

    Chad N. Freude

    April 2, 2007 at 4:02 pm

    POTD

    What does the P stand for?

  54. 54.

    Chad N. Freude

    April 2, 2007 at 4:03 pm

    really great lawyers comedians

    Almost as funny as Andrew Dice Clay.

  55. 55.

    Punchy

    April 2, 2007 at 4:17 pm

    TanKKKredo just announced he’s in fer the Preznetsee thang. Looks like him and Highly Unfortunately Named Since He’s in the Cracker Party Brownback are going to do battle to see who can come up with the most outrageous ethnic slurs on Mexicans.

    I think TanKKKredo with start with “beaners”, then I Dont Really Have a Brownback will counter with “Border Pheasants”, or some such bullshit. In the end, they’ll cancel each other out and completely hand the ENTIRE Hispanic voting bloc to the Dems.

    Hooray.

  56. 56.

    Krista

    April 2, 2007 at 4:40 pm

    What does the P stand for?

    Are you serious? Someone clever enough to have picked the name Chad N. Freude doesn’t know what POTD stands for? Sigh…well, I’ll bite, then. It stands for Post Of The Day. And no, we don’t actually have anything official, it’s simply a way to express admiration for a well-written comment.

  57. 57.

    Punchy

    April 2, 2007 at 4:42 pm

    And no, we don’t actually have anything official

    How about a date with Punchy? (for the lady posters, only…please…not that there’s anything wro….nevermind)

  58. 58.

    Jake

    April 2, 2007 at 4:48 pm

    Sorry Punchy, Newter Gangrene already has that covered and then some.

    Newt doesn’t fool around (except with his aides). In just a few terse sentences all tells all non-English speakers to Cheney themselves. Truth2Power. Will he start complaining that the gubbmint wastes our hard earned tax dollars on translation pamphlets for emergency response workers? Stay tuned!

  59. 59.

    Chad N. Freude

    April 2, 2007 at 5:00 pm

    Are you serious?

    I was when I asked, then I had a smacks-forehead-doh moment but didn’t put up a never-mind post (saving the bandwidth for the troops).

    Someone clever enough to have picked the name

    Thank You for the compliment.

    Wait — I mean Oh, it was nothing, just a little tidbit that occurred to me one day when I was experiencing the feeling.

    we don’t actually have anything official

    Too bad. I was hoping for a statuette, or at least a plaque.

  60. 60.

    Chad N. Freude

    April 2, 2007 at 5:02 pm

    Pathetic plea for help: Would some kind soul please tell me how to consistently get a blank line at the end of a post.

  61. 61.

    Punchy

    April 2, 2007 at 5:06 pm

    You’ve got to be fucking kidding me

    For the lazy, here’s the money shot (anyone surprised?):

    a report from the independent federal watchdog agency, the President’s Council on Integrity and Efficiency, which was harshly critical of Inspector General Robert W. Cobb. Cobb took office in 2002, after his nomination by Bush and confirmation by the Senate. He previously served as an ethics expert in the White House general counsel’s office.

    I’ll again ask–is there ANYBODY in gov’t who’s not a partisan hack? Jesus H….

  62. 62.

    Chad N. Freude

    April 2, 2007 at 5:21 pm

    He previously served as an ethics expert in the White House general counsel’s office.

    Who’s in charge here? Lewis Carroll?

  63. 63.

    Krista

    April 2, 2007 at 5:31 pm

    Too bad. I was hoping for a statuette, or at least a plaque.

    Well, you could have gotten a date with Punchy, but unfortunately, you do not meet the qualification requirements.

    And yeah, the name is quite clever, although I’ll bet you that there probably IS someone out there with that exact name. A lot of people just don’t think when naming their kids (case in point, a fellow – now deceased, I believe – from my hometown, who was named Purdy Good. I shit you not, that was his name.)

  64. 64.

    Chad N. Freude

    April 2, 2007 at 5:44 pm

    you do not meet the qualification requirements.

    Ah, but on the internet nobody knows that for certain.

    Thanks for thinking I’m clever. It’s you and me against the world, kid. When I disclosed my nom d’écran to a very good friend, he thought it was inane because (a) in his opinion I don’t look like a “Chad”, and (b) he completely missed the pun.

    Omigod, as I was typing the above, I flashed on someone saying “Hi ya, Chad, how ya hangin’?” I really need help.

  65. 65.

    ed

    April 2, 2007 at 5:44 pm

    A

    lot of people just don’t think when naming their kids (case in point, a fellow – now deceased, I believe – from my hometown, who was named Purdy Good.

    Let us never forget Texas oil heiress and community pillar, Ima Hogg.

  66. 66.

    Rome Again

    April 2, 2007 at 5:59 pm

    Pathetic plea for help: Would some kind soul please tell me how to consistently get a blank line at the end of a post.

    try typing an html tag for “break” at the end.
    Here, let me see if it works, may not, but can’t say without trying…

  67. 67.

    Rome Again

    April 2, 2007 at 6:00 pm

    nope, didn’t work

  68. 68.

    Rome Again

    April 2, 2007 at 6:00 pm

    perhaps a paragraph tag?

    I’m not going to try it, you try it this time. LMAO

  69. 69.

    Krista

    April 2, 2007 at 6:01 pm

    I really need help.

    Well, you’re in the right place.

    No, you won’t get the help you need here, but at least you’ll encounter people who will make you look like the ne plus ultra of sanity.

  70. 70.

    Grrr

    April 2, 2007 at 6:13 pm

    Some of these points may be open to debate, but as far as I can tell the opposing arguments are mostly based on misinformation and gross distortions of fact (see McCain, John)

    There can’t be much debate when “misinformation and gross distortions of fact” are now seen as the nominal operating standard for conservative apologists these days.

    So what. As long as they think that emulating empty-souled tools like Orrin Hatch is the Ultimate Way To The Top of The Dickhead Pyramid, the quicker their doom.

    Fuck them. The plug on this stupid war will soon be pulled, and they will all be proven to be liars and idiots.

  71. 71.

    Zombie Santa Claus

    April 2, 2007 at 6:28 pm

    To be fair, Brownback is actually taking a lot of shit from the KKK wing of the RepubliKKKan Party on the issue of granting amnesty to illegal aliens. It’ll probably end up costing him the crucial racist support he needs to win the nomination, since the theocrats and neocons aren’t going to carry him over the top. If you guys read up on your batshit insane rightwing blogs, you’d know this.

  72. 72.

    Chad N. Freude

    April 2, 2007 at 6:34 pm

    batshit insane

    Why did you do this??? I looked at that website and must now blind myself and have my brain decontaminated!

  73. 73.

    Chad N. Freude

    April 2, 2007 at 6:35 pm

    Need I add “Aieee!

  74. 74.

    Zombie Santa Claus

    April 2, 2007 at 6:40 pm

    Why did you do this??? I looked at that website and must now blind myself and have my brain decontaminated!

    Batshit insanery is the wellspring of spoofdom. You’ve got to read it to learn it.

  75. 75.

    Chad N. Freude

    April 2, 2007 at 6:41 pm

    This is priceless. From a fair and balanced Fox News poll:

    Do you think the Democratic Party should allow a grassroots organization like Moveon.org to take it over

    Clearly the answer must be a resounding “NO!” It’s unthinkable to have a party taken over by its members!

  76. 76.

    Darrell, D'Souza, Delay and Strauss

    April 2, 2007 at 6:41 pm

    Orrin Hatch for Attorney General. Now that would be funny.

  77. 77.

    Zombie Santa Claus

    April 2, 2007 at 6:45 pm

    Orrin Hatch for Attorney General. Now that would be funny.

    I think I should run for President, maybe. I’ll appoint Orrin Hatch. If you’re going to have a government of, by, and for spoofs, you really might as well go balls-out.

  78. 78.

    Zombie Santa Claus

    April 2, 2007 at 6:49 pm

    Bear in mind, you govern a country with the spoofs you have, not the spoofs you wish you had.

  79. 79.

    Chad N. Freude

    April 2, 2007 at 6:51 pm

    Orrin Hatch for Attorney General. Now that would be funny.

    As in “What’s that funny smell?”

  80. 80.

    Zombie Santa Claus

    April 2, 2007 at 7:10 pm

    That Brownback blog is funny. Here’s a post where the guy bitches about heliocentrism:

    From its embrace of evolution to its ridiculous assertions that the world is running out of oil, it is clear to right-thinking people that science often serves one side of the ideological spectrum. Sadly, that side is not the side which right-thinking people embrace.

    We see it all the time. Anyone who challenges the hegemony of leftist men of “science” like Richard Dawkins, Stephen Hawking, and Albert Einstein is automatically ridiculed, labeled a fool, or ignored entirely. Such is the fate of those who understand intelligent design, for example.

    Clearly, the world was designed. Who could look at a sunset and call it a result of random coincidence? Who looks at the beauty of a meadow full of lilies, without also pondering the awe-inspiring Love of the One who designed both flowers and the Earth upon which they grow, and the Sun that warms them? Who can look at the human heart and not observe that the G-d-shaped hole many of us have carried within it was meant to be filled with the Gospels of Love and Truth?

    Sadly, the ignorant exult in their ignorance. The mock us, they assail us, they persecute us at every turn. This despite cogent, rational, sensible explanations for why evolution must be nonsense. As if the Word of the Lord were not enough, though! That’s the part that makes me angriest of all. Scientists will worship the tenets of a dead Englishman who sailed around riding Galapagos turtles, but ask them to read the Scriptures for their evidence and they look at you as if you were the crazy one! The struggle against their idiocy continues, however. True science marches on.

    Obviously, funding for “science” is an area in which President Brownback will have to continue the stellar work of George Bush. The potential for harm to the fragile minds of our nation’s children is enormous, should their heads become filled with lies like evolution, or should they not be taught the controversial nature of Heliocentrism.

  81. 81.

    Zombie Santa Claus

    April 2, 2007 at 7:12 pm

    They link to Rathergate, too. I always liked Rathergate. Funny, funny, spoofy posts.

  82. 82.

    Tulkinghorn

    April 2, 2007 at 7:47 pm

    blogsforbrownback is art. Tasteless, perhaps, but art.

  83. 83.

    Chad N. Freude

    April 2, 2007 at 7:53 pm

    ZSC, that has to be satire. It cannot possibly be serious. Although some of the commenters appear to be deadly serious about it.

    “Actually, Einstein was quite devout.”

    Einstein was a devout pacifist. Pacifism is the worst kind of mental disorder. He was also a Deist, which is the third worst mental disorder. The second worst being atheism, of course.

    “Further, why do you equate acceptance of evolution to being an athiest?”

    Evolution and theology are mutually exclusive. Mealy-mouthed pseudo-Christians will pretend otherwise, of course, but a simple perusal of Genesis will reveal the fallacy of their assertion.

    A simple perusal of Genesis… Now there’s a killer argument.

    I agree with Ann [Coulter]. Evolution is a Godless theory that only liberals, atheists, and other mentally deranged individuals embrace. Intelligent design is the only sensible explanation of how a thing like evolution could even be possible, and even THAT doesn’t explain how it could happen in less than 6,000 years. Still, I’ll admit that ID is probably correct. The Lord possibly allowed for hyperspeed evolution in the first 2,000 years or so.

    It’s the funniest thing I’ve read in — well, six thousand years. Thanks for this one.

  84. 84.

    Chad N. Freude

    April 2, 2007 at 7:55 pm

    Tasteless, perhaps, but art.

    Like Chocolate Jesus. Oh, wait, he’s tasty.

  85. 85.

    jake

    April 2, 2007 at 8:00 pm

    Break out the condoms. Wade Horn has left the building.

    Now, someone please tell me that brownbacking blog is a joke. I don’t think Freep would like competition for the fRightiest Blog on the Internons.

    p.s. I said horn.

  86. 86.

    Krista

    April 2, 2007 at 8:10 pm

    I wonder if anybody will be making little chocolate Jesuses (Jesi?) in time for Easter?

  87. 87.

    Krista

    April 2, 2007 at 8:19 pm

    blogsforbrownback is art. Tasteless, perhaps, but art.

    Good lord. That’s seriously disturbing to realize that there are people out there who think that way.

  88. 88.

    jake

    April 2, 2007 at 8:30 pm

    I wonder if anybody will be making little chocolate Jesuses (Jesi?) in time for Easter?

    You mean like these?

    Jesus Christ on a … chocolate crutch they’ve got cruxifixtion lollies. I’m sure if I searched I’d find a confectioners that features different saints achieving martyrdom.

    So I ain’t lookin’.

  89. 89.

    Krista

    April 2, 2007 at 9:06 pm

    You know, I’m not even Christian (lapsed Catholic, now agnostic), and yet, I actually do find that chocolate crucifix lolly to be a bit over the line.

  90. 90.

    Chad N. Freude

    April 2, 2007 at 9:16 pm

    chocolate Jesuses

    I like Girl with Torah Lollipop. Vermeer is one of my favorite Dutch painters.

  91. 91.

    Tulkinghorn

    April 2, 2007 at 9:17 pm

    Anybody offended by the ‘girl with a Torah’ chocolate lollipop? It may be loss offensive to eat a little girl than to eat the Torah, but I am outside my culture on this one…

  92. 92.

    Rome Again

    April 2, 2007 at 9:24 pm

    Jesus Christ on a … chocolate crutch they’ve got cruxifixtion lollies. I’m sure if I searched I’d find a confectioners that features different saints achieving martyrdom.

    ::knows I’m gonna get flamed for this::

    Satan at his finest!

  93. 93.

    Rome Again

    April 2, 2007 at 9:27 pm

    Anybody offended by the ‘girl with a Torah’ chocolate lollipop? It may be loss offensive to eat a little girl than to eat the Torah, but I am outside my culture on this one…

    They make the Torahs on Friday, and the Crucifixes on Saturday.

  94. 94.

    The Easter Bunny

    April 2, 2007 at 9:31 pm

    I wonder if anybody will be making little chocolate Jesuses (Jesi?) in time for Easter?

    You know, I’d love to make some chocolate Saviors for Easter. Unfotunately, I’m spending all my time wading through the Godforsaken maple fields of Canuckistan, watching my Peeps suffer and die for freedom while you dicklicks piss and moan on this blog about how tough your lives are. Have you ever stepped in a sticky gob of melted marshmallow and sugar that used to be one of your friends, moonbats? Have you? Yeah, I didn’t think so.

    No, I ain’t gay. I just ain’t. Mrs. Claus and I have an understanding, but it don’t involve none of that.

    Really, fatty? If the walls of the communal showers you had installed in the elf dorms could talk, I bet they’d tell a different story.

    BTW ZoSaCl, re 28, there are spoofs that demonstrate a modicum of sarcastic wit and spoofs that are simply obnoxious noise.

    What’s a “spoof”?

  95. 95.

    Chad N. Freude

    April 2, 2007 at 9:44 pm

    Anybody offended by the ‘girl with a Torah’ chocolate lollipop?

    Only to the extent that I’m offended by vulgarity, inanity, and the transformation of iconic images into something “cute” for kids. Lest that be misunderstood, I do not consider the chocoChrist art(?)work an attempt to be cute nor is it aimed at children, and I don’t find it the least bit offensive. Although it does have a … you know, and some say that’s offensive.

  96. 96.

    Chad N. Freude

    April 2, 2007 at 9:51 pm

    Anybody offended by the ‘girl with a Torah’ chocolate lollipop?

    Only to the extent that I’m offended by vulgarity, inanity, and infantilization.

  97. 97.

    Digital Amish

    April 2, 2007 at 9:53 pm

    If you guys read up on your batshit insane rightwing blogs, you’d know this.

    Come on now, the truth. That’s just you Scrutator folks having a little fun again, isn’t it?

  98. 98.

    Chad N. Freude

    April 2, 2007 at 9:55 pm

    Sorry ’bout that. John’s server seemed to die on the original, so I posted the condensed version. I can’t believe I actually wrote “iconic images.” I will be taken out and shot by a firing squad composed of all my English teachers.

  99. 99.

    Tulkinghorn

    April 2, 2007 at 10:09 pm

    That’s just you Scrutator folks having a little fun again, isn’t it?

    It is hard to tell, which itself tells you something.

    Have there been any mirror-image spoof sites where right-wingers pretend to be stupid leftists in order attract a following of ditto-heads to make fun of?

  100. 100.

    ConservativelyLiberal

    April 2, 2007 at 10:16 pm

    Tulkinghorn Says:

    blogsforbrownback is art. Tasteless, perhaps, but art.

    Hey, if Jesus floating in a jar of piss is art, just about anything is art…lol!

    While that quote sounds like the ultimate spoof, I have to say that I know a few nuts that sound just like that. You can bet I keep them at arms length too as I DO NOT want to engage these nuts in conversation about religion and evolution. It would be a total waste of time, that is for damn sure.

    Anyone who knows about carbon dating knows that the bible is a fairy tale. I love reading religious sites that dispute carbon dating, the arguments are so bad that your head feels like it is going to explode trying to understand their verbal contortions. I was an A student in Chem in college, and understanding that was a breeze compared to the religious right and their twisted logic disputing evolution.

    While carbon dating will be pretty much useless from the Industrial Revolution onward, it is damn accurate prior to that. We know how Carbon-14 is created (neutrons from cosmic rays striking Nitrogen-14 atoms, converting them to C-14) and that while it is dispersed atmospherically, more of it is created in certain areas of the world that others. Knowing this, it is pretty easy to find the age of something (that was once alive) IF it falls within the age range C-14 dating is accurate to 50,000 years, or up to 100,000 years using more sensitive detection methods like an electron microscope. There are other more sensitive isotopes out there that they can use too, but C-14 is the most common.

    That blows the creationism time scale out of the water, and that just pisses them off. And BTW, I am an ex-Catholic and I was brought up to believe in the bible. Heck, I was an altar boy for four years…lol! As a teenager, I realized that what I read in the bible did not match the emperical evidence at hand. When I was able to confirm this, the bible became a book with some odd stories in it.

    I am not an atheist, but I do not believe in God in the way that Christianity does. I have no idea what my concept would fall under, but I do not care as I do not feel the need to worship some unknown entity/deity to earn my way into heaven. I will live a good life and treat others well, helping out those I can while I wander my way through life. I do not need an assurance that after my life is over that I will have another one that will last forever. I am quite happy to live the one I am, and that is enough for me.

    If I go to hell, so be it… ;)

  101. 101.

    jake

    April 2, 2007 at 10:25 pm

    Anybody offended by the ‘girl with a Torah’ chocolate lollipop?

    All of this crap is bizarre. It’s like a well-intentioned alien thought: People like chocolate, what can we make out of chocolate? Don’t ask me to explain but it makes my brain itch.

    Plus on this same site one can purchase such essentials as the “I love BJ Kit” and, possibly the worst idea of the 21st century: edible condoms.

    No, no, no, no. Religion and dick-shaped candies don’t go together. [Insert Catholic Priest joke here.]

  102. 102.

    Tulkinghorn

    April 3, 2007 at 12:33 am

    Actually, there is a whole set of arguments against carbon-14 dating. Since relatively recent items can give you a date such AD 1200 +/- 350 years it is a small step to convince the uneducated that all c14 dating is dubious. As usual, the creationists ignore all the other isotopes, or Electron Spin Resonance, or the entire fields of Geology, Astronomy, and so on. If you argue on the basis of C14 alone, they will be pretty resistant.

    Now of course you can just ask them where the Bible literally states that the earth was made 6000 years ago, and watch all the inferential steps the literalists will have to take…

  103. 103.

    jake

    April 3, 2007 at 5:56 am

    Now of course you can just ask them where the Bible literally states that the earth was made 6000 years ago, and watch all the inferential steps the literalists will have to take…

    Heh. For yet more amusement, ask them how they know a “day” to God is the same as our 24-hour day. You can also request a cogent explanation of how God created just two people, they had two sons, one son whacked the other and then the remaining son went off and got married to a woman from some other group of people.

  104. 104.

    Scruffy McSnufflepuss

    April 3, 2007 at 6:27 am

    blogsforbrownback is art. Tasteless, perhaps, but art.

    God, those people are fucking nuts.

  105. 105.

    J.D. Rhoades

    April 3, 2007 at 7:37 am

    You’re pretty new around here, fella, so let me suggest that you consider my name, click on the link, and ask yourself if anyone the slightest bit serious would ever post like this.

    The problems with satirizing wingnuts is that so many of them are so far out, their rantings sound like satire when they’re serious.

  106. 106.

    Tim F.

    April 3, 2007 at 7:50 am

    Have there been any mirror-image spoof sites where right-wingers pretend to be stupid leftists in order attract a following of ditto-heads to make fun of?

    They start Kos diaries. For them it’s a two-fer, since they can and use their real blog to gin up outrage at the crazy people at Kos.

  107. 107.

    Tim F.

    April 3, 2007 at 7:50 am

    there’s an ‘and’ in there that don’t belong. anyhow.

  108. 108.

    Punchy

    April 3, 2007 at 8:08 am

    For yet more amusement, ask them how they know a “day” to God is the same as our 24-hour day. You can also request a cogent explanation of how God created just two people, they had two sons, one son whacked the other and then the remaining son went off and got married to a woman from some other group of people.

    Incest, baby. Incest. Had to be. Also, ask them who actually knows what God did vis-a-vis creating the Earth, since no one was around until Day 7. How do they know what God did on, say, day 3, besides probably (cuz if you’re God, why not?) pop open a brew or three and check out some online porn….

  109. 109.

    Chad N. Freude

    April 3, 2007 at 8:31 am

    no one was around until Day 7. How do they know what God did on, say, day 3

    Ha! God was around from before day 1, and Genesis is the Word of God. Therefore we know exactly what happened before people were intelligently designed into existence. QED. So there, Smartass! Another victory in the War Between Revealed Religious Certain Knowledge and Atheist Evolution Lies.

  110. 110.

    Fecapult

    April 3, 2007 at 8:53 am

    Incest, baby. Incest. Had to be. Also, ask them who actually knows what God did vis-a-vis creating the Earth, since no one was around until Day 7. How do they know what God did on, say, day 3, besides probably (cuz if you’re God, why not?) pop open a brew or three and check out some online porn….

    This begs the question: What all excatly was he doing before day 1? And how long was that anyway? Was he just real lazy before he up and decided to get around to, you know, actually DOING something with himself? How long did it take him to self-motivate, without a mother to call and nitpick on a daily basis?

  111. 111.

    Zifnab

    April 3, 2007 at 8:59 am

    Also, ask them who actually knows what God did vis-a-vis creating the Earth, since no one was around until Day 7.

    Humanity existed on Day 6, lib-tard. This just shows you for your stupid aethist devil lies that you are.

  112. 112.

    Andrew

    April 3, 2007 at 9:46 am

    Hey guys, have you heard about the “suiciders who kill innocent lives?”

    Question to Republicans: What the fuck is wrong with you?

  113. 113.

    Scruffy McSnufflepuss

    April 3, 2007 at 9:56 am

    Incest, baby. Incest. Had to be. Also, ask them who actually knows what God did vis-a-vis creating the Earth, since no one was around until Day 7. How do they know what God did on, say, day 3, besides probably (cuz if you’re God, why not?) pop open a brew or three and check out some online porn….

    Either that, or they fucked the space aliens. It isn’t ruled out in the Bible, so it’s what I’ll believe. Chariots of the Gods, baby. The moonbat’s retort to religious fundamentalist crazies.

    Hey guys, have you heard about the “suiciders who kill innocent lives?”

    Good stuff. Suicide should be illegal, punishable by the death penalty. That’ll make people think twice before killing themselves.

  114. 114.

    Scruffy McSnufflepuss

    April 3, 2007 at 9:59 am

    They start Kos diaries. For them it’s a two-fer, since they can and use their real blog to gin up outrage at the crazy people at Kos.

    I used to think some of the liberals who posted around here were actually conservative spoofs. Paddy O’Shea was almost like a wingnut parody of a leftist, for example.

  115. 115.

    Jake

    April 3, 2007 at 10:15 am

    Incest, baby. Incest. Had to be.

    I thought perhaps the fight between Cain and Abel was over an attractive sheep. That would explain the large numbers of sheeple.

  116. 116.

    28 Percent

    April 3, 2007 at 11:56 am

    That is a very good question Fecapult (if that is your real name). That is what GOOD science is all about, proving what we know is true from the Bible. So it would be good to use science to find out what happened before The First Day. Maybe nothing because that was the first day and there was no time before then I do not know. But it is a good question.

  117. 117.

    Pb

    April 3, 2007 at 12:06 pm

    What has happened, since, of course, is they have gotten into difficulty because they didn’t adhere to that very rigorous definition of what the mission is. The question of committing U.S. forces to combat, or putting them into a situation where they can become engaged in combat, requires a great deal of intellectual rigor and tight chain of command, a clear understanding of what their mission is all the way up and down the line. And that seems to have been lacking, in terms of how the administration has dealt with it.

    Name that quote…

  118. 118.

    John S.

    April 3, 2007 at 1:01 pm

    That is what GOOD science is all about, proving what we know is true from the Bible.

    You are either a spoof or an idiot. Pick one.

  119. 119.

    ConservativelyLiberal

    April 3, 2007 at 1:22 pm

    As you said, C-14 is only one method of dating, but lately it has been refined tremendously by further study as to how C-14 is created and dispersed on earth. Knowing this, they have been able to further narrow down the +/- factors better. But not everyone is queued in to it yet. Still, even with +/- factors it still blows the 6,000 year timeline out of the water. Or the 12,000, or the 13,000 (they keep moving the target…).

    What I like to point out too is that how on earth is God going to find the 144,000 male virgins for heaven during the apocalypse. Not just any 144,000 people, but 144,000 MALE VIRGINS…

    Heaven sounds like a sausagefest… I think I like the 72 virgins that Islam offers…lol! Regarding Adam & Eve, I think the fight over the sheep is right. There are far too many sheeple today.

  120. 120.

    chopper

    April 3, 2007 at 2:20 pm

    I thought perhaps the fight between Cain and Abel was over an attractive sheep. That would explain the large numbers of sheeple.

    the story of cain and abel is a metaphor. it’s an announcement essentially saying ‘attention reader: here’s a story to let the idea really sink in that your ass shouldn’t take all the stuff that follows too seriously‘.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - frosty - 2024 National Park Road Trip - Canada (1/3) Banff
Photo by frosty (1/19/26)

Mary Peltola Alaska Senate

Donate

Order Your Pet Calendars!

Order Calendar A

Order Calendar B

 

Recent Comments

  • Spanky on Tuesday Morning Open Thread (Jan 20, 2026 @ 10:36am)
  • Gloria DryGarden on Tuesday Morning Open Thread (Jan 20, 2026 @ 10:35am)
  • Betty Cracker on Tuesday Morning Open Thread (Jan 20, 2026 @ 10:35am)
  • YY_Sima Qian on Tuesday Morning Open Thread (Jan 20, 2026 @ 10:34am)
  • comrade scotts agenda of rage on Tuesday Morning Open Thread (Jan 20, 2026 @ 10:34am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
On Artificial Intelligence (7-part series)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix
Rose Judson (podcast)

Mary Peltola Alaska Senate

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Privacy Manager

Copyright © 2026 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!