• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

No offense, but this thread hasn’t been about you for quite a while.

Republicans in disarray!

Peak wingnut was a lie.

Republicans are radicals, not conservatives.

Pessimism assures that nothing of any importance will change.

Red lights blinking on democracy’s dashboard

Jesus, Mary, & Joseph how is that election even close?

The party of Reagan has become the party of Putin.

Fuck these fucking interesting times.

Meanwhile over at truth Social, the former president is busy confessing to crimes.

Whoever he was, that guy was nuts.

I’m pretty sure there’s only one Jack Smith.

They fucked up the fucking up of the fuckup!

Proof that we need a blogger ethics panel.

T R E 4 5 O N

Infrastructure week. at last.

Whatever happens next week, the fight doesn’t end.

Sitting here in limbo waiting for the dice to roll

Historically it was a little unusual for the president to be an incoherent babbling moron.

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires

We still have time to mess this up!

When do we start airlifting the women and children out of Texas?

Imperialist aggressors must be defeated, or the whole world loses.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Good Christ Almighty, Where Do They Find These People?

Good Christ Almighty, Where Do They Find These People?

by John Cole|  October 13, 200910:18 pm| 67 Comments

This post is in: Assholes, Blogospheric Navel-Gazing, General Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

In the future, the FTC can rest assured I will burn every free book from the Heritage Foundation and Regnery. Considering I felt like going on a three day bender after I read the Party of Death by Ramesh Ponneru, burning the damned things is probably healthier in the long run. If I get a copy of Going Rogue, I might just be driven to shoot smack.

As a side note, it is really hard to argue for good government when you have jackasses like Cleland running around.

(via)

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Must See TV
Next Post: Gotta love Larison »

Reader Interactions

67Comments

  1. 1.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    October 13, 2009 at 10:27 pm

    Considering I felt like going on a three day bender after I read the Party of Death by Ramesh Ponneru

    Did you really read that??

  2. 2.

    gbear

    October 13, 2009 at 10:30 pm

    Just put the book in a bucket outside and enjoy it’s long, lingering self-destruction over the course of the winter.

    I got an email from Borders this afternoon with a coupon for 40% off Palin’s book. Maybe I should print it out, form a bag with it, fill it with cat shit and light it on fire in front of the store.

  3. 3.

    Brick Oven Bill

    October 13, 2009 at 10:30 pm

    If I succeed in becoming America’s Next Great Pundit, the blame will fall directly at your feet, John Cole. Although I will not share my $200/column with you. Or any future proceeds.

    DougJ, by the way, does not stand a chance.

  4. 4.

    arguingwithsignposts

    October 13, 2009 at 10:32 pm

    Just finished watching a little bit of the Limbaugh interview on Countdown. I need a shower. Ugh, I just want to say, “Fuck You Rush Limbaugh.” Seriously. “Fuck You.” What a dick.

  5. 5.

    General Winfield Stuck

    October 13, 2009 at 10:32 pm

    like Cleveland running around.

    eww that’s hard. This Sunday be comin’ round soon enough.

  6. 6.

    dmsilev

    October 13, 2009 at 10:36 pm

    Can you please stop mentioning Sarah and her book? Every time you do, Skynet Google thinks that this place is RedState and serves up a bunch of SarahPAC and BuySarah’sBook ads.

    I’d much rather see Mutant Pamela Anderson.

    -dms

  7. 7.

    dsc

    October 13, 2009 at 10:37 pm

    gbear:

    I got an email from Borders this afternoon with a coupon for 40% off Palin’s book.

    what in the world did you ever order from them that would
    make them think…?

    40% off–free with free shipping wouldn’t be a big enough offer for me–not even if they threw in a free Kindle with 20 free downloads–I can’t have that book in my house.

    Not even in my mailbox. ewwww.

  8. 8.

    The Republic of Stupidity

    October 13, 2009 at 10:41 pm

    And given the topic of the thread, I couldn’t help but notice “Ann Coulter – Free” right at the top…

    Sheesh… poor Annie’s given it it away, FOR FREE… and I STILL don’t want it…

    That’s gotta hurt…

  9. 9.

    kommrade reproductive vigor

    October 13, 2009 at 10:41 pm

    Shorter Richard [Ahem] Cleland:

    At last! An excuse to read blogs all day, and we’ll get paid. Hur hur suckers!

    I see this one breaking down really quickly. Especially since they’re going to be flooded with false complaints filed by every dipshit with a grudge against a blog.

    Anyone willing to lay a bet on how long it takes for this dog to wind up in court?

  10. 10.

    Anne Laurie

    October 13, 2009 at 10:44 pm

    Burning those book-shaped novelty items could reduce your heating bills. So if the poisonous fumes didn’t kill you first, Richard Cleland will totally pwn your DFH arse. Maybe we should do a Blogger State-of-Mind Strike Farce and mail all those review copies straight to Richard Cleland… postage due.

  11. 11.

    gbear

    October 13, 2009 at 10:44 pm

    what in the world did you ever order from them that would make them think…?

    Nothing. I’ve bought some CDs and books about MN history. Border’s doesn’t target their coupons like Amazon. Most of their coupons are totally useless (romance novels and memoirs), but rarely political. The Palin coupon was a stunner.

  12. 12.

    dmsilev

    October 13, 2009 at 10:44 pm

    Sometimes, Amazon’s recommend-o-matic coughs up some nice ironies:

    Buy Going Rogue: An American Life and get Catastrophe at an additional 5% off Amazon.com’s everyday low price.

    ‘Catastrophe’ is by Dick Morris, which means that the title also serves as the review.

    -dms

  13. 13.

    Ben Richards

    October 13, 2009 at 10:46 pm

    @dmsilev: we’re doing something right. The Asian mail order bride business is directing their ads here now!

    Thai was the summer feature. Autumn is bringing us The Philippines.

  14. 14.

    Genine

    October 13, 2009 at 10:49 pm

    From the FTC website:

    As a consumer or business person, you may be more familiar with the work of the Federal Trade Commission than you think.

    The FTC deals with issues that touch the economic life of every American. It is the only federal agency with both consumer protection and competition jurisdiction in broad sectors of the economy. The FTC pursues vigorous and effective law enforcement; advances consumers’ interests by sharing its expertise with federal and state legislatures and U.S. and international government agencies; develops policy and research tools……

    …When the FTC was created in 1914, its purpose was to prevent unfair methods of competition in commerce as part of the battle to “bust the trusts.” Over the years, Congress passed additional laws giving the agency greater authority to police anticompetitive practices.

    With the economy and business practices being what they are today- this is what the FTC concentrates on?

    Good to know.

    Agency fail.

  15. 15.

    kommrade reproductive vigor

    October 13, 2009 at 10:49 pm

    @Anne Laurie: Yep.

    And if food bloogers get free meals from restaurants … Let’s just say Mr. Cleland had better think twice before he stomps out those flaming paper bags on his front porch.

  16. 16.

    Genine

    October 13, 2009 at 10:50 pm

    Grrrr! Blockquote!

    Commenter fail.

  17. 17.

    gbear

    October 13, 2009 at 10:51 pm

    @The Republic of Stupidity:

    That’s gotta hurt…

    Smarting. Moderate butthurt detected.

  18. 18.

    beltane

    October 13, 2009 at 10:51 pm

    I want to hear William Shatner do a reading of Sarah Palin’s book. Seriously. And then I want to get very, very drunk.

    Also

  19. 19.

    Comrade Kevin

    October 13, 2009 at 10:53 pm

    @Brick Oven Bill:

    If I succeed in becoming America’s Next Great Pundit,

    Thankfully, there’s no danger of that happening.

  20. 20.

    hamletta

    October 13, 2009 at 10:55 pm

    My buddy, Bad, Bad Radio Boy, takes a box of CDs to the used CD store whenever he needs some extra cash; which is highly illegal, as promo copies are clearly marked as eternal property of the record label, and the artists don’t get paid for them.

    But it’s OK, because he gets a(n obviously meager) salary.

    Allrighty then!

  21. 21.

    MikeJ

    October 13, 2009 at 10:55 pm

    I’ve got no problem with people who get free books from publishes saying, “I got this book for free and it still sucks or “I got this book for free and I think it’s pretty good.”

    This isn’t anywhere near the stupidity of the FEC.

  22. 22.

    hamletta

    October 13, 2009 at 10:59 pm

    When I was freelancing, I did album reviews for as low as $20 a pop, IIRC. How many readers do you have to have before you can make that from BlogAds? Probably not many.

    Mr. Cleland is making my brain hurt. I don’t like him very much.

  23. 23.

    Martin

    October 13, 2009 at 10:59 pm

    Without defending the stupidity of the FTC argument, there actually is a problem there worth addressing. The problem isn’t books but other kinds of reviews – particularly computer/gadget reviews. I know reviewers that would get a good $1K per week worth of goods to review. That might have changed with the economy and all, but handouts of $200 gadgets were common.

    Between what they keep and what they would sell on eBay, they were doing alright writing good reviews.

  24. 24.

    Martin

    October 13, 2009 at 11:02 pm

    With the economy and business practices being what they are today- this is what the FTC concentrates on?

    Can’t argue against that point.

  25. 25.

    MikeJ

    October 13, 2009 at 11:05 pm

    Without defending the stupidity of the FTC argument, there actually is a problem there worth addressing.

    I think they did the right thing but just didn’t go far enough. Every magazine, TV, or newspaper based review should plainly state if they got a free review copy and how much the maker spends on advertising with the parent org.

    Speaking of which, what ever happened to the American version of Top Gear? I expected it to suck just because there’s no way NBC would allow entertainers to say anything bad about an advertiser, but the whole thing seems to have vanished.

  26. 26.

    Comrade Kevin

    October 13, 2009 at 11:08 pm

    @MikeJ:

    I think they did the right thing but just didn’t go far enough. Every magazine, TV, or newspaper based review should plainly state if they got a free review copy and how much the maker spends on advertising with the parent org.

    I agree. Consumer Reports, for instance, always makes sure people know that they actually go out and buy every single thing they review.

  27. 27.

    Roger Moore

    October 13, 2009 at 11:09 pm

    @dmsilev:

    Every time you do, Skynet Google thinks that this place is RedState and serves up a bunch of SarahPAC and BuySarah’sBook ads.

    I think that’s an excellent argument in favor of him doing so. I enjoy the idea of Balloon-Juice being funded by the wingnuts we ridicule enough that I’m happy to put up with their ads.

  28. 28.

    gbear

    October 13, 2009 at 11:12 pm

    @hamletta:

    A couple of years ago my house was burglarized and the thieves took a couple hundred CDs from my collection (along with cameras and cash). After the cops left my house, I called the closest used CD/record store and asked them to keep an eye out for a large box of CDs with artist names B thru K (Beatles thru Kinks). Within the hour, I got a call from the cops saying that the store had called them to report my CDs. They had bought them all pretty much knowing they were stolen goods and were probably really pissed that I’d called.

    I had 95% of the CDs back on my shelf the next day and the store made sure that every missing CD was replaced so that I didn’t make a stink about them receiving stolen goods. The store was out the $300 they’d paid the theif. Dinks.

  29. 29.

    matoko_chan

    October 13, 2009 at 11:13 pm

    John Cole you are my god.
    I loathe Ponnuru with the fire of a thousand suns.

  30. 30.

    asiangrrlMN

    October 13, 2009 at 11:23 pm

    @MikeJ: Hm. I would agree that this is the way to approach this asshattery. Either everyone must state this or no one should, though. It irks me.

  31. 31.

    mikefromtexas

    October 13, 2009 at 11:25 pm

    You could donate those books to a third world country with a shortage of toilet paper. That would put them to a better use than anyone actually reading them.

  32. 32.

    Third Eye Open

    October 13, 2009 at 11:28 pm

    @asiangrrlMN: OT, I know, but are you familiar with the band, Atmosphere? Slug, the front-man is from your neck of the woods, and I assume aside from drink and hump like rabbits, there isn’t much to do other than revel in your tangential relationship to underground hip-hop artists.

    If you don’t know them, may I recommend this.

  33. 33.

    Mithras

    October 13, 2009 at 11:34 pm

    John, dude. No one says “shoot smack” any more. I thought you were my age, not Karl Malden’s.

  34. 34.

    Warren Terra

    October 13, 2009 at 11:37 pm

    The problem the rules address is real, and disclosure matters. What’s unfair is the FTC exempting journalists and victimizing bloggers.

    And iirc there’s a $30 exemption, which will cover most books.

  35. 35.

    bago

    October 13, 2009 at 11:45 pm

    I vaguly remember this thing you call a see-dee. Aren’t they used for fish scales on art projects?

  36. 36.

    PurpleGirl

    October 13, 2009 at 11:52 pm

    I used to frequent The Strand. I don’t know if they still do it but publishers used to stamp “reviewer’s copy — not for resale” on the inside front cover. How do I know this… from the reviewer’s copies I used to buy at The Strand.

  37. 37.

    MikeJ

    October 13, 2009 at 11:53 pm

    I vaguly remember this thing you call a see-dee. Aren’t they used for fish scales on art projects?

    In my experience in radio they are square plastic cases the record company sends the PD that contain a round piece of plastic/metal and some cocaine.

  38. 38.

    Will

    October 14, 2009 at 12:00 am

    An eye-opening look into an industry I knew nothing of: book reviewing. Thanks!

  39. 39.

    asiangrrlMN

    October 14, 2009 at 12:04 am

    @Third Eye Open: Um, we do have museums and theaters and sporting events, ya know! I don’t know this group, but that song is tight. Thanks for sharing the link.

  40. 40.

    SFAW

    October 14, 2009 at 12:07 am

    I think I just decided to become an automobile reviewer/blogger.

    So, to make Cleland happy, I will gladly sign an affidavit (in triplicate), swearing that I will not sell, nor otherwise dispose of, any Ferraris (just about any model, I’m not a snob about it), AC Cobras (real ones, not kits), MG TCs, Porsche 959s, Lambos, or Vipers. And if it will make him even happier, I promise to give them all lousy reviews.

    Trabants, on the other hand, go straight to Cash for Clunkers.

  41. 41.

    Perry Como

    October 14, 2009 at 12:09 am

    I’ll just leave this here.

  42. 42.

    asiangrrlMN

    October 14, 2009 at 12:09 am

    @SFAW: Hm. I like the way you think. I want to be a reviewer of chocolates and Alan Rickman. Can I do that?

  43. 43.

    SFAW

    October 14, 2009 at 12:22 am

    @SFAW: Hm. I like the way you think. I want to be a reviewer of chocolates and Alan Rickman. Can I do that?

    I don’t see why not, and your ideas got me thinking – can I review Kate Winslet? Or Cate Blanchett?

  44. 44.

    andy

    October 14, 2009 at 12:23 am

    Don’t be all mad- get a barrel stove!

  45. 45.

    The Golux

    October 14, 2009 at 12:40 am

    Cleland… Didn’t he write Fanny Hill?

  46. 46.

    SiubhanDuinne

    October 14, 2009 at 12:52 am

    @The Golux: O/T but is your screen name from The Thirteen Clocks? Because that’s one of the Best. Books. Evah.

  47. 47.

    Wile E. Quixote

    October 14, 2009 at 12:55 am

    @John Cole

    Considering I felt like going on a three day bender after I read the Party of Death by Ramesh Ponneru

    You read Party of Death. Jesus John, I didn’t know you were a masochist. How did you train up for this? I’d imagine that you’d have to be able to shave your balls, scrub them pink with a loofah and then liberally coat them with a mixture of rock salt, habanero sauce and Icy-Hot without shedding a tear before you could even consider reading a book by Ramesh Ponnuru. Dude, you’re tough.

  48. 48.

    DougL (frmrly: Conservatively Liberal)

    October 14, 2009 at 12:57 am

    What about reviewers of pron? Anyone want that back?

  49. 49.

    DougL (frmrly: Conservatively Liberal)

    October 14, 2009 at 1:01 am

    @Wile E. Quixote:

    No shit. It sounds like the radical cure for crabs would be easier to endure:

    Shave half of your body, cover the other half with lighter fluid and light it. When the crabs run over to the unshaved side, stab them with an ice pick.

  50. 50.

    The Other Steve

    October 14, 2009 at 1:07 am

    What’s the problem with giving the books to the library?

    In the tech world, generally speaking pretty much every blogger is on the take. So I really didn’t have a problem with the FTC decision.

    If I’d been smarter years ago I would have started a blog reviewing video cards so I’d always get the latest video card for free, suckahs!

  51. 51.

    Wile E. Quixote

    October 14, 2009 at 1:21 am

    @SFAW

    Will it be a deeply insightful and penetrating review?

  52. 52.

    Gary D

    October 14, 2009 at 1:41 am

    I remember the Heritage economic study of Social Security for blacks. See if you can spot the errors.

    Assuming all blacks are born, earn average American wages, never have accidents or have serious health issues, and they all drop dead when they hit 69, then they are screwed by Social Security.

    This is Heritage economic analysis?

    Bush and the usual gang of ignorant Goppies spread for months the theme that Social Security was discriminatory because of that “study.”

    The GAO had done a previous study which, of course, showed that Social Security is a bit better deal for blacks than whites.

  53. 53.

    hamletta

    October 14, 2009 at 2:01 am

    @Gary D: Be quiet, dear. The grown-ups are talking.

  54. 54.

    hamletta

    October 14, 2009 at 2:09 am

    @asiangrrlMN: Sorry.

    Me first.

    You get to review the emptied husk formerly known as Alan Rickman, hereafter known as ζ.

  55. 55.

    tc125231

    October 14, 2009 at 2:28 am

    @Brick Oven Bill:

    If I succeed in becoming America’s Next Great Pundit….

    Go for it, pal. Anything to hasten the demise of WaPo, which was a newspaper as recently as the 1990s.

  56. 56.

    Comrade Kevin

    October 14, 2009 at 3:02 am

    I have been coming down with something over the last 48 hours, really obnoxious. I blame Cole, who probably gave it to me over the Internet.

  57. 57.

    SFAW

    October 14, 2009 at 6:44 am

    @ Wile E. Quixote

    Christ, I hope so.

    Of course, so practice efficiency, get “economies of scale”, etc., I’m thinking I’ll need to review them together.

  58. 58.

    SFAW

    October 14, 2009 at 6:51 am

    “TO practice efficiency”.

    I blame it on lack of caffeine and Obama’s [insert wingnut-phrase-du-jour here].

  59. 59.

    asiangrrlMN

    October 14, 2009 at 8:37 am

    @hamletta: No. I have dibs on Mr. Rickman. Everyone here knows that. I do have to say you made me laugh with your ’empty husk’ and symbol line. Heh.

  60. 60.

    John Cole

    October 14, 2009 at 8:47 am

    Yes, I read Party of Death. I like to keep up on the wingnuts, see what they are doing.

  61. 61.

    IndieTarheel

    October 14, 2009 at 9:27 am

    @mikefromtexas:

    You could donate those books to a third world country with a shortage of toilet paper. That would put them to a better use than anyone actually reading them.

    Given the way stupidity spreads in Wingnutistan, I’d be fearful of even this use.

  62. 62.

    Woodrowfan

    October 14, 2009 at 9:48 am

    Hell, free books in my area of interest is why I like writing book reviews… So far in 2009 I’ve gotten (counts) TWO free books! WOO HOO!! On The Gravy Train Baby! GRAAAVVYY TRRRRAAAIINN!!!

  63. 63.

    Very Reverend Crimson Fire of Compassion

    October 14, 2009 at 9:53 am

    @IndieTarheel: Wouldn’t smearing shit on the pages of right-wing books be redundant?

  64. 64.

    bellatrys

    October 14, 2009 at 10:50 am

    Considering I felt like going on a three day bender after I read the Party of Death

    Wouldn’t it have been better to do that *before* reading it?

  65. 65.

    QDC

    October 14, 2009 at 12:08 pm

    All I know is that if you received a review copy of the Furminator, you’d better get in touch with a lawyer before the FTC comes knocking.

  66. 66.

    Ruckus

    October 14, 2009 at 3:08 pm

    @Very Reverend Crimson Fire of Compassion:
    You beat me to it and better played as well

  67. 67.

    charmcity

    October 14, 2009 at 5:53 pm

    For anyone wondering about selling promotional CDs, it is perfectly legal. One would assume this same ruling applies to advance reader or review copies of books (and any other free merchandise) as well.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • E. on Squishable Morning Thread: Free Speech (Mar 29, 2023 @ 11:23am)
  • CaseyL on Three Eras of the ACA (Mar 29, 2023 @ 11:22am)
  • rdldot on Late Night Open Thread: Murphy’s Discourse (Mar 29, 2023 @ 11:10am)
  • munira on On The Road – BillinGlendaleCA – The Winter Sky (Mar 29, 2023 @ 11:02am)
  • Another Scott on COVID-19 Coronavirus Updates: March 29, 2023 (Mar 29, 2023 @ 10:55am)

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Seattle Meetup coming up on April 4!

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!