Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

We are aware of all internet traditions.

You don’t get to peddle hatred on saturday and offer condolences on sunday.

Consistently wrong since 2002

When I decide to be condescending, you won’t have to dream up a fantasy about it.

They fucked up the fucking up of the fuckup!

I’d try pessimism, but it probably wouldn’t work.

But frankly mr. cole, I’ll be happier when you get back to telling us to go fuck ourselves.

Republicans do not pay their debts.

Meanwhile over at truth Social, the former president is busy confessing to crimes.

My years-long effort to drive family and friends away has really paid off this year.

Within six months Twitter will be fully self-driving.

The worst democrat is better than the best republican.

… pundit janitors mopping up after the GOP

Do not shrug your shoulders and accept the normalization of untruths.

And now I have baud making fun of me. this day can’t get worse.

Balloon Juice has never been a refuge for the linguistically delicate.

The GOP couldn’t organize an orgy in a whorehouse with a fist full of 50s.

No offense, but this thread hasn’t been about you for quite a while.

Peak wingnut was a lie.

Sitting here in limbo waiting for the dice to roll

They’re not red states to be hated; they are voter suppression states to be fixed.

A lot of Dems talk about what the media tells them to talk about. Not helpful.

“woke” is the new caravan.

I see no possible difficulties whatsoever with this fool-proof plan.

You are here: Home / Open Threads / Please Let This Happen

Please Let This Happen

by | 131 Comments

This post is in: 

I’m begging:

INGRAHAM: Would you agree to a debate with Al Gore on this issue?

PALIN: Oh my goodness. You know, it depends on what the venue would be, what the forum. Because Laura, as you know, if it would be some kind of conventional, traditional debate with his friends setting it up or being the commentators I’ll get clobbered because, you know, they don’t want to listen to the facts.

So help me ALLAH, if Gore sighs once in this debate I will punch him in the neck and kick him in the junk. But wouldn’t you love to see that moron up there just winking and blushing and making shit up?

Reader Interactions

131Comments

  1. 1.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    if it would be some kind of conventional, traditional debate with his friends setting it up or being the commentators I’ll get clobbered because, you know, they don’t want to listen to the facts.

    lmfao

  2. 2.

    Michael

    Sweet Baby Jesus and the Troops, let it be so. They could make a fortune selling it on pay per view.

  3. 3.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    But wouldn’t you love to see that moron up there just winking and blushing and making shit up?

    No.

  4. 4.

    Comrade Dread

    No, because all she’d have to do is smile and wink and not fall over and we’d have weeks of media coverage about how she won the debate and was electric and this paves the way for a 2012 run making her the frontrunner.

    Also, throw in a few limp dick and fat jokes about Gore and his energy overusing mansion.

  5. 5.

    General Winfield Stuck

    He will need a temporary lobotomy, or a fistful of Qualudes to tune in the right frequency. A little drool bucket on a chain around the neck is recommended, but optional.

  7. 7.

    Makewi

    I’m all for it, so long as one of the questions is “what is the temperature of the earths core”.

  8. 8.

    CT Voter

    I’ll get clobbered because, you know, they don’t want to listen to the facts.

    Again with the projection. What’s with RepCons?

  9. 9.

    Jay C

    as you know, if it would be some kind of conventional, traditional debate with his friends setting it up or being the commentators I’ll get clobbered because, you know, they don’t want to listen to the invent facts.

    Fixt.

    LMAO

  11. 11.

    Bruce (formerly Steve S.)

    But wouldn’t you love to see that moron up there just winking and blushing and making shit up?

    No, because debating is not science and not a process by which reality is more closely approximated.

  12. 12.

    Bruce (formerly Steve S.)

    But wouldn’t you love to see that moron up there just winking and blushing and making shit up?

    No, because debating is not science and not a process by which reality is more closely approximated.

  13. 13.

    Bubblegum Tate

    @Demo Woman:

    She would not agree to a debate even if Sean Hannity asked the questions.

    Dingdingding! We have a winner.

    Her statement about facts is pretty fucking funny, though.

  17. 17.

    New Yorker

    No, I don’t want to see this, because it’s another opportunity for Lady Starbursts to portray herself as a victim, which is what keeps her relevant. She even sets it up with I’ll get clobbered because, you know, they don’t want to listen to the facts.

    Remember, this is a deranged person who is in a Jerry Springer-esque feud with the high school dropout father of her grandson. The less credibility that we give her by taking her seriously, the better.

  19. 19.

    demkat620

    No, because even if he destroyed everything that she had to say, the media and the GOP would paint it as a huge win.

    It doesn’t matter what you do when the person you are trying to convince does not live in reality.

  20. 20.

    Morbo

    She’ll only agree to it if it’s held at a church, Our Lady of Perpetual Victimhood to be exact.

  21. 21.

    Death Panel Truck

    “what is the temperature of the earths core”.

    “Well, it’s real hot down there, doncha know? That’s where hell is, you betcha.”

  22. 22.

    geg6

    I would be appalled if Al Gore lowered himself to her level to make the obvious point that she is an idiot who knows less than nothing. No. No. Hell, no. Besides, he could hang her ignorance out for all the world to see and the Village (aka MoDo and friends) would still score her the winner. See any 2000 debate he had with the Shrub.

  23. 23.

    schrodinger's cat

    Can we have a Top Chef open thread, please?

    Edited to add : And a photo of the Top Cat, Tunch
    Yay, I can has edit!! thanks John!

  24. 24.

    Jennifer

    No, because she has nothing to add to the global conversation on global warming, and none of us should act like she does.

  25. 25.

    freelancer

    Venue, Venue, Venue….Eureka!

    How about a three ring circus
    Everytime Al Gore is speaking an orchestra quietly plays Pomp and Circumstance with the spotlight on his Nobel.

    When Palin speaks, play circus music and have her constantly interrupted by some kid in his twenties stealing the mike to give us his update in Mafia Wars.

  27. 27.

    demkat620

    You know, I just got home from work 1/2 an hour ago and that’s all it took.

    I am now convinced that even Obama can’t right this ship. There is just way too much stupid in this country today.

  31. 31.

    General Winfield Stuck

    OT

    It’s the sixties again, this time from Tea Bag Hell

    So here’s the plan. On Tuesday, December 15 at 8:45 AM thousands of us will meet in Washington, DC at the fountain in Upper Senate Park. From there we will march to the Senate offices, go inside, and demonstrate our opposition to the government takeover of health care. We call this plan “Government Waiting Rooms”. The intention is to go inside the Senate offices and hallways, and play out the role of patients waiting for treatment in government controlled medical facilities. As the day goes on some of us will pretend to die from our untreated illnesses and collapse on the floor. Many of us plan to stay there until they force us to leave. A backup location for this demonstration will be announced if they block us from entering the offices.

    Double Oh Shit!!

  32. 32.

    R-Jud

    @geg6:

    I would be appalled if Al Gore lowered himself to her level to make the obvious point that she is an idiot who knows less than nothing. No. No. Hell, no.

    This. She’s not a legitimate debating partner on this issue, period. It would be like Obama debating Erick Erickson.

  33. 33.

    beltane

    I want to see the cage match between Palin and Bill Clinton. Gore is too nice and too clear. Clinton will confuse the heck out of her and force her to say something so crazy that it would even make George Will laugh.

  34. 34.

    Zifnab

    So help me ALLAH, if Gore sighs once in this debate I will punch him in the neck and kick him in the junk.

    Oh whatever, John. You make it through ten minutes of Sarah Palin talking without sighing, groaning, or putting a gun to your head, and then you can complain.

  38. 38.

    Zifnab

    @beltane: Actually, that makes me think. I would love to hear a debate between Bill Clinton and Al Gore.

    On the one hand, you’ve got President Middle Ground Third Way himself, and on the other you’ve got Mr. “We have to move far, quickly”, one of the shining stars of the environmental movement.

    I would love to hear business-friendly Clinton and eco-first Gore have a serious, rational, debate about how to tackle climate change. It would go a long way towards breaking this monolithic image of the Democratic Party while opening up a serious debate on exactly how courteous to the status quo we need to be as we combat global warming.

  39. 39.

    demkat620

    @beltane: Now that would be fun to see.

    The Big Dog would be just the person to take her arguments apart.

    That would be Must See TV.

  41. 41.

    Midnight Marauder

    @General Winfield Stuck:

    As the day goes on some of us will pretend to die from our untreated illnesses and collapse on the floor. Many of us plan to stay there until they force us to leave.

    By all means, don’t stop at pretending, kiddos. Would Ronaldus Magnus have just pretended to die in order to stop a government takeover of healthcare? No, he would have committed seppuku right there in the middle of the every single Senate office and hallway, all at the same time. How is that possible you, ask? Well, it’s starts with a little–BECAUSE SHUT UP, THAT’S WHY!

  43. 43.

    handy

    Palin’s argument in this debate would be:

    1) Call Al Gore fat (LMAO ManBearPig)
    2) Remind him he lives in a big house (LOL Carbon footprint)
    3) Claim victory

  44. 44.

    Bubblegum Tate

    @New Yorker:

    On second thought, this:

    No, I don’t want to see this, because it’s another opportunity for Lady Starbursts to portray herself as a victim, which is what keeps her relevant. She even sets it up with I’ll get clobbered because, you know, they don’t want to listen to the facts.

  45. 45.

    jeffreyw

    The only venue that seems appropriate for a Palin debate is a big vat of Jello.

    Not that there’s anything wrong with Jello.

  46. 46.

    Jim

    @demkat620:

    @beltane: Now that would be fun to see.
    The Big Dog would be just the person to take her arguments apart.

    Yup. Folksy and dumb as a bucket of mud vs folksy and very very smart. That would be some good TeeVee watchin’.

  48. 48.

    JD Rhoades

    @Comrade Dread:

    No, because all she’d have to do is smile and wink and not fall over and we’d have weeks of media coverage about how she won the debate and was electric and this paves the way for a 2012 run making her the frontrunner.

    This. I’m old enough to remember when there were similar starbursty comments over Dan Quayle’s “winning” the Vice Presidential debate with Loyd Bentsen. (No, I’m not kidding). One of the few moments when George Will was not a complete putz is when he responded to someone saying that Quayle had won by “exceeding everyone’s expectations” by saying “he exceeded expectations when he didn’t drool.”

  50. 50.

    Bubblegum Tate

    @General Winfield Stuck:

    Reminds me of a great series of Bloom County strips wherein crazed right-wing protesters took over a building a la ’60s hippies, then demanded that the cops fire tear gas at them, bash their heads, etc.

  52. 52.

    RedKitten

    I would be appalled if Al Gore lowered himself to her level to make the obvious point that she is an idiot who knows less than nothing. No. No. Hell, no.

    Yeah, but Gore’s damned if he does, damned if he doesn’t. If he refuses to debate Lady Starbursts, then the popular meme will be that he’s afraid because he knows that she’ll beat his fancy, Nobel-winning pants off. If he DOES debate her, then she’s already set herself up by indicating that no matter what happens, it won’t be a fair fight and the entire process will be biased against her. So if she’s considered to have “won” the debate, she’ll be the underdog hero who bested that horrible fraud, Al Gore. If she loses, it’s just more proof of the ever-present liberal bias that permeates every bit of our society.

    Heads they win, tails we lose.

  56. 56.

    RedKitten

    @beltane:

    I want to see the cage match between Palin and Bill Clinton. Gore is too nice and too clear. Clinton will confuse the heck out of her and force her to say something so crazy that it would even make George Will laugh.

    That would be awesome. Gore (and even Obama) would take the wrong tact of trying to use logic on her. Big Dog would just laugh at her, and would soon have the entire room laughing too.

  58. 58.

    FlipYrWhig

    Palin really does think that “debate” is some kind of liberal plot to make her look bad. She said that same damn thing to kick off the debate with Biden.

  59. 59.

    demkat620

    @RedKitten: Yes! That’s why I would pay big money.

    Despite what the GOP tried to do to him, most Americans love Bill. Oh they know he’s a bullshit artist. But he’s an honest bullsit artist. That’s his schtick. He’d have them eating out of the palm of his hand in five minutes and she’d be so flustered it would make that Couric interview look like a cakewalk.

    Make. This. Happen.

    Please!

  61. 61.

    cmorenc

    @geg6

    I would be appalled if Al Gore lowered himself to her level to make the obvious point that she is an idiot who knows less than nothing. No. No. Hell, no. Besides, he could hang her ignorance out for all the world to see and the Village (aka MoDo and friends) would still score her the winner. See any 2000 debate he had with the Shrub.

    You cannot win a debate with an igorant idiot if the media people describing and anlyizing it are shallow and lazy themselves, taking “American Idol” judges or “color” commentators on sports broadcasts as their implicit model.

    All Palin would have to do is to trot out a half-dozen plausible-sounding “facts”, at least two of which seemed to have *something* relevant to allegedly counter something AlGore had said, and maintain that winsomely smiling chipmunk look – and Gore’s objectively solid arguments and facts would get muffled the same haze of mental inattentiveness many people gave their high school history class. What the chattering class would pick up on and remember was something charming the cute girl said.

  62. 62.

    snoey

    Make it a reality show debate – prep Simon Cowell and Padma Lakshmi with the basics from RealClimate and pass the popcorn.

  63. 63.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    John Edwards, the last losing candidate for VP before Palin is the most logical choice to debate her. Not only do they have that in common, but they also both have limited political resumes, experience with getting what they want just by the way they look and sordid personal lives.

    Nevermind, can we just get ’em to do a porno?

  66. 66.

    Laura W

    @cmorenc:

    What the chattering class would pick up on and remember was something charming the cute girl said.

    And then we should totally do our own BJ poll about what was painted on her toenails.
    I vote Green Balloons!

    @BHF: Thanks. You’re sweet.

  67. 67.

    Rick Taylor

    I already saw it in 2000. Well, without the starbursts, but certainly with the winks and nudges and making shit up. It was the first debate, and at the time me and my friends went to bed elated, because we were convinced that after that performance Bush could not possibly win. So I’m less excited by the idea now than I was then. I expect if it happened, it would deepen the divide between conservative and liberal (if such a thing could be possible) as both saw their side as unambiguously victorious, and could not believe the other side didn’t see it too.

  68. 68.

    Rick Taylor

    No, on further consideration, I don’t like the idea. As much as I respect Gore and am grateful for his work, he is not a scientists. These issues should be decided through debate by people who know what they are talking about in peer reviewed journals, not by celebrities, how ever well or ill informed.

  69. 69.

    El Cid

    You know, it depends on what the venue would be, what the forum

    Yeah. A right wing Megachurch filled with Tea Party members and whose hosts and microphone controllers were Sean Hannity, Michael Savage, and Sean Hannity’s junior, Michael Levin.

  70. 70.

    The Republic of Stupidity

    @Just Some Fuckhead:

    Nevermind, can we just get ‘em to do a porno?

    John Edwards… and Sarah Palin… in a porno…

    Gee… thanks a whole lot for THAT little visual in my head…

    Now I can look forward to yet ANOTHER 18 to 36 hrs of hysterical blindness…

  71. 71.

    Raenelle

    No. No. No. The gasbags handicap these things–set the bar way high for the Dems, the competent, the intelligent; and way low for Repubs, the dim-witted, the ignorant. All Palin would have to do is avoid visible drooling, and she would be declared the winner. All Al would have to do is show some slight sign of impatience at her dullness, and he would be tarred and feathered by the media. Hell, they’d brand him a bully if he simply used a four-syllable word. In sane world, the debate over global warming is already over. In our world, however, Al cannot win–ever–and Sarah can only shine. He would be a fool to enter a debate where the rules are controlled by media personalities almost as clueless as Palin.

  72. 72.

    Anya

    By his friends she means anyone else, except Mr. Starburst, Hannity, Greta and maybe the morons on fox and friends.

  73. 73.

    Zach

    I imagine “his friends” would include, say, the President of the National Academy of Sciences.

    It’s too bad there that, for whatever reason, unimpeachable scientific voices are no longer in public view. The closest thing we’ve got are self-interested entrepreneurs (Venter, Kamen, etc), a few astronomers, and a string theorist on NOVA. Elevating Steve Chu to head DOE was a good start, but it won’t get us back to where we once were: Feynman describing the Challenger O-ring failure… Werner von Braun describing rocketry to children… Linus Pauling demonstrating outside the White House

    The number of people who think global warming’s a fraud isn’t only rising because of the propaganda of a well-funded opposition; there’s a genuine lack of objective scientific voices in public discourse.

  74. 74.

    cmorenc

    @beltane

    I want to see the cage match between Palin and Bill Clinton. Gore is too nice and too clear. Clinton will confuse the heck out of her and force her to say something so crazy that it would even make George Will laugh.

    That’s abolutely f*cking BRILLIANT! Clinton possesses the optimal combination of deeply knowledgeable student/policy wonk and charmingly agile bullshit artist. He instinctively knows exactly which buttons to push and which verbal judo moves to use to render his opponent quickly pinned helpless, without seeming to become mean and nasty in going about it. Against Bill Clinton, Palin would come across as exactly the sort of lazily ignorant, totally out of her depth person she is, even completely aside from the particular topic at hand under debate.

  76. 76.

    Person of Choler

    “But wouldn’t you love to see that moron up there just winking and blushing and making shit up?”

    Yes, I think Gore would look that silly.

  78. 78.

    General Winfield Stuck

    All debates are done by Sarah Rules – no exceptions

    At the insistence of the McCain campaign, the Oct. 2 debate between the Republican nominee for vice president, Gov. Sarah Palin, and her Democratic rival, Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr., will have shorter question-and-answer segments than those for the presidential nominees, the advisers said. There will also be much less opportunity for free-wheeling, direct exchanges between the running mates.

    McCain advisers said they had been concerned that a loose format could leave Ms. Palin, a relatively inexperienced debater, at a disadvantage and largely on the defensive.

    Short questions for short knowledge.

  79. 79.

    El Cid

    Never forget that opponents of evolutionary theory always come away thinking that the anti-science “intelligent design” proponent wins.

    This is not a ‘debate’, it’s a piece of live performance martyrdom and sneering competition so that the rubes can see how much Gore hates ordinary folk.

  80. 80.

    Regnad Kcin

    I need a photo-opportunity
    I want a shot at redemption
    Don’t want to end up a cartoon
    In a cartoon graveyard

    “Al”

  81. 81.

    General Winfield Stuck

    @Anya:

    In a catty way, I do believe she did. That’s our Sarah Serendipity, always with another wabbit in her hat.

  83. 83.

    arguingwithsignposts

    I find it interesting that both Gore and Palin had a journalism background. But Gore was a Senator and Vice President, and didn’t quit.

    Palin has absolutely no freakin’ clue about this stuff she’s spouting. And no moral compunction about spouting it.

    BTW, has anyone figured out who ghost-wrote her column?

  84. 84.

    JK

    @Raenelle:

    Debating Sarah Palin is like trying to nail jello to a wall. As she did in the VP debate, she’d evade questions she didn’t like and the moderator wouldn’t push her.

    Additionally, the bar for Palin would be excruciating low, while excruciating high for Gore.

    The MSM has never liked Gore and no matter what he’d say, such a debate would either be scored a tie or a win for Palin.

  87. 87.

    El Cid

    I would like to see a so-called quantum mechanic debate my local mechanic! Ha! ‘Bet that ivory tower weirdo would sure be shown a thing or two!

  88. 88.

    The Dangerman

    Facts? WHAT FUCKING FACTS, SARAH? This hillbilly bitch is Ross Perot the Sequel. And that fucker got put down (by Al Gore, as I recall) on Larry King Live.

    I’d agree to debate the piece o’ crap ONLY if it were broadcast on radio or only the sound was streamed. I don’t want her winning by flashing a winking smile or because she showed up wearing some cool Jimmy Choo’s.

  89. 89.

    El Cid

    @The Dangerman: And it wasn’t an accident choosing Perot, because Gore’s arguments for NAFTA were so bad that I would easily have countered them, but by putting loudmouth big ear EDS dickhead on the TV tube, it was easy to make people think that the only opponents of the agreement were big eared weirdos with paranoia problems.

  90. 90.

    Sarah Failin'

    Come on, it’s Sarah Palin – I’ll bet you a case of Science Diet that she backs out rather than go through with this. I think the money you could save with GEICO has better debating skills.

  93. 93.

    Tsulagi

    if Gore sighs once in this debate I will punch him in the neck

    Or says “lockbox.”

    Yeah I’d watch that on pay per view. Palin rambling on about flagging climate molecules while watching the ozone layer from her house window. Unfettered or bound by reality or that liberal science stuff. Wingnut drool cups would overflow.

  94. 94.

    SpotWeld

    A fun idea since there is no way Palin could ever hold up in an actual debate on a factual subject like global warming.

    But lets face it, first it would a Fox News venue.
    Sarah would just drop a long rambling folksy gallop of non-facts and gut-feeling nonsense.

    Al Gore would probably give a competent rebuttal but he’s human he’ll probably stumble or flub something.

    Then it’ll be over to the commentators (which have spent the preshow giving the “fair and balanced” view of climatology.. not). They’ll be sure to point out how Palin “connected with the fraudulence” and “really came out swinging”. On reflection they’ll be sure to point out how Al Gore lost the election, and really who wants to listen to a bunch of science anyway.

    Palin will claim victory, and get the interviews. And edited segments of Gore will be played ad naseum to show when he wasn’t blinking enough or something.

    It’ll be like “debating a creationists” and Richard Dawkins has covered why that’s a bad idea.

  96. 96.

    Noonan

    When Palin says it depends on the “forum” I’m pretty sure she means the dollar amount. Gotta keep living hillbilly fabulous.

  98. 98.

    SpotWeld

    @freelancer:

    I will not go along with any proposal to strip one out of every six dollars from the Social Security trust fund and privatize the Social Security that you’re counting on. That’s Social Security minus. Our plan is Social Security plus. We will balance the budget every year, and dedicate the budget surplus first to saving Social Security. Putting both Social Security and Medicare in an iron-clad lock box where the politicians can’t touch them — to me, that kind of common sense is a family value.
    Source: Al Gore: Speech to the 2000 Democratic National Convention Aug 18, 2000

  101. 101.

    noncarborundum

    @General Winfield Stuck: This sounds just great. Then proponents of HCR could stage a counterdemonstration and pretend to be people dying from untreated illnesses because they have no fucking health insurance.

  102. 102.

    Silver Owl

    Translation: Gore would not let me win with all the stupid shit I say on a regular basis. I am a conservative so if I lose then it is clearly a set up and not because I really really suck.

  104. 104.

    JK

    @freelancer:

    I missed the Al Gore “Lockbox” meme. Anyone care to bring me up to speed?

    PAUL SOLMAN: So the government has only two ways to raise money– taxes and borrowing, which brings us to the key to this story: The metaphorical lockbox about which we heard so many last year.

    AL GORE: I’ll keep Social Security in a lockbox.

    AL GORE: In a lockbox.

    PAUL SOLMAN: The term lockbox actually invented by Republicans became the mantra of the Gore campaign and a standing national box.

    SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE ACTOR: One of the keys to the lock box would be kept by the President. The other key would be sealed in a small container and placed under the bumper of the Senate Majority Leader’s car. (Laughter)

    PAUL SOLMAN: But Candidate Bush also took the lockbox pledge.

    GEORGE W. BUSH: Because we are lock-boxing the payroll taxes, our promises to seniors is going to be kept.

    PAUL SOLMAN: Congress soon adopted the concept. And what was the lockbox idea? Actually saving this year’s and every future’s Social Security surplus — instead of as former Congressional Budget Office Chief Robert Reischauer told us spending the surplus by using it as part of the budget.

    h/t http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/economy/july-dec01/lockbox_8-22.html

  109. 109.

    tim

    … some kind of conventional, traditional debate with his friends setting it up or being the commentators ….

    ‘Cause, ya know, “conventional, traditional” debates are all fraudulent scams slanted in favor of teh liburls. LOL

  110. 110.

    eric

    This is easy: Big Dog says let’s do 2 hours on Fox with Shep Smith doing the honors.

    done and done.

    eric

  111. 111.

    danimal

    Agreed to all those that say No since Gore would lose points for speaking in well-constructed sentences and Palin would gain points by winking and melting conservative hearts like they are an arctic iceberg, you betcha. Also, Gore’s fat and she’s fit. Too.
    @demkat620: Al Queda’s number 3 is the terrorists’ equivalent of the Spinal Tap drummer.

  112. 112.

    trollhattan

    @ cmorenc

    That’s abolutely f*cking BRILLIANT! Clinton possesses the optimal combination of deeply knowledgeable student/policy wonk and charmingly agile bullshit artist. He instinctively knows exactly which buttons to push and which verbal judo moves to use to render his opponent quickly pinned helpless, without seeming to become mean and nasty in going about it. Against Bill Clinton, Palin would come across as exactly the sort of lazily ignorant, totally out of her depth person she is, even completely aside from the particular topic at hand under debate.

    And he’d ask her out for drinks in the middle of the debate talkie thing. It would be goddamn pay-per-view gold.

  114. 114.

    Fargus

    I have an insane environmental scientist friend who has a ridiculous bug up her ass about Al Gore, and seems to think that he’s trying to usurp credit and claim that he’s a climate scientist. I sent her this link, and her first reaction was that Al Gore is almost as big an idiot as Sarah Palin. That made me want to vomit.

  117. 117.

    RedKitten

    That’s abolutely f*cking BRILLIANT! Clinton possesses the optimal combination of deeply knowledgeable student/policy wonk and charmingly agile bullshit artist. He instinctively knows exactly which buttons to push and which verbal judo moves to use to render his opponent quickly pinned helpless, without seeming to become mean and nasty in going about it. Against Bill Clinton, Palin would come across as exactly the sort of lazily ignorant, totally out of her depth person she is, even completely aside from the particular topic at hand under debate.

    Plus, while Gore would look slightly pained/constipated/aggravated by the entire thing, Clinton would be like a confident gray tabby, eyes gleaming with amusement, playing with a particularly juicy mouse before getting bored and eviscerating it. I think he’d have a lot of fun taking Mooselini on.

  118. 118.

    Belafon (formerly anonevent)

    @Raenelle: This is why the insta-polls in the debates last year were a good thing. Instant reaction became the story rather than the pundits stories.

  119. 119.

    Allen

    “I don’t want a conventional debate, where people have to form complete, coherent sentences.”

  120. 120.

    Tom

    You know, it depends on what the venue would be, what the forum. Because Laura, as you know, if it would be some kind of conventional, traditional debate with his friends setting it up or being the commentators I’ll get clobbered.

    FTFPalin.

  121. 121.

    Nylund

    they don’t want to listen to the facts.

    The entire GOP has just turned into one giant textbook case of psychological projection.

    It has gotten to the point where I just automatically assume that whatever accusation is made against someone else must hold true for the speaker.

  122. 122.

    kth

    Actually, in that exchange Palin is the lesser of the two dingbats. Laura Ingraham is dumb enough to think that a Palin-Gore debate on global warming would help the denialist side. Palin at least has enough sense to throw water on the proposal.

  123. 123.

    Davis X. Machina

    It was the first [Bush-Gore] debate, and at the time me and my friends went to bed elated, because we were convinced that after that performance Bush could not possibly win

    Studies came out that winter that people who watched the debate itself scored it 65-35% Gore, but people who only watched the coverage of the debate scored it 65-35% Bush. I used the video of that first debate in debate class for years. The kids just laughed at Bush — and this is post 9/11, during the Iraq war.

    It’s hard to bullshit teenagers. They don’t know anything. They know they don’t know anything, and they can tell when someone else doesn’t know anything either.

  124. 124.

    Martin

    Honestly, there has never been a more appropriate application of the adage:

    Never argue with an idiot, they drag you down to their level and beat you with experience

    Palin would almost certainly ‘win’ the debate, because she’d make it about baby Jesus, Al Gore being biased in favor of the emails because he invented the internet, and terrorists wanting America to use less oil, see: terrorists, palling around with.

    In other words, she’d be arguing the ‘facts’ as most Americans know them, Al Gore would be doing all of this egghead bullshit.

  125. 125.

    Platonicspoof

    But wouldn’t you love to see that moron up there just winking and blushing and making shit up?

    No thanks.
    Palin belongs in climate change politics like a clown belongs at a funeral.
    I’ll take my bread without the circuses.

  127. 127.

    ds

    Palin is pretty good at lying about shit, so she could probably hold her own in people’s perceptions about the debate.

    In terms of facts, Gore would wipe the floor with her. But how many people are familiar enough with climate science to know what’s fact and what’s bullshit?

    But as long a she peppered her statements with confident-sounding falsities and cute anecdotes about Alaska she could probably be declared the “winner.”

  128. 128.

    Paul L.

    @SpotWeld:

    . And edited segments of Gore will be played ad naseum to show when he wasn’t blinking enough or something.

    Or maybe it will show he does not know what he is talking about.

    there are these incredibly hot rocks, ’cause the interior of the earth is extremely hot, several million degrees

    Progressive defend this as Gore misspoke. But if Bush or Palin had said the same thing progressives would state it proves that the person is a moron and how little they know about “science” .

  131. 131.

    Mrs. Tarquin Biscuitbarrel

    @General Winfield Stuck: $arah allegedly liked Obama’s speech ONLY because she claims he took all of his inspiration for the speech from her ghost-written “book.”

    Can’t you just imagine POTUS thumbing anxiously through “Going Rogue” for Big Ideas?

Comments are closed.