• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

When do we start airlifting the women and children out of Texas?

White supremacy is terrorism.

Following reporting rules is only for the little people, apparently.

They think we are photo bombing their nice little lives.

Speaking of republicans, is there a way for a political party to declare intellectual bankruptcy?

Usually wrong but never in doubt

This has so much WTF written all over it that it is hard to comprehend.

Fuck these fucking interesting times.

Whoever he was, that guy was nuts.

The willow is too close to the house.

Republican obstruction dressed up as bipartisanship. Again.

Insiders who complain to politico: please report to the white house office of shut the fuck up.

Impressively dumb. Congratulations.

Republicans in disarray!

How can republicans represent us when they don’t trust women?

We cannot abandon the truth and remain a free nation.

“Squeaker” McCarthy

Conservatism: there are some people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

You cannot shame the shameless.

I see no possible difficulties whatsoever with this fool-proof plan.

We’ll be taking my thoughts and prayers to the ballot box.

When your entire life is steeped in white supremacy, equality feels like discrimination.

The arc of history bends toward the same old fuckery.

Yeah, with this crowd one never knows.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Glibertarianism / Open Thread: Nutpicking Shameless

Open Thread: Nutpicking Shameless

by Anne Laurie|  September 13, 20115:28 am| 50 Comments

This post is in: Glibertarianism, Open Threads, Readership Capture, Assholes

FacebookTweetEmail

As a distraction from that Sully fella, I give you the “director of MyGovCost.org, a project of the Center on Entrepreneurial Innovation at the Independent Institute” and “the Searle visiting assistant professor of Political Science at Duke University“, Emily C. Skarbek & David Skarbek, explaining why “It’s Time to Get Rid of FEMA“:

In the last two weeks, a 5.9-magnitude earthquake and Hurricane Irene both rocked the East Coast. Immediately, politicians began touting the crucial role that FEMA would play in rebuilding these communities and the need for federal disaster response. However, these presumptions are largely based on the misguided notions that the federal government can redirect necessary resources efficiently and that private enterprise is incapable of getting the job done. Contemporary and historical evidence show that neither of these assumptions is justified.
__
Politicians from all sides of the political spectrum agree that FEMA’s work in the wake of Hurricane Katrina was a spectacular failure. […] __
The historical record for disaster response in the absence of FEMA and a centralized federal operation also attests to the ability for private enterprise to provide more efficient relief more effectively. The Great Chicago Fire of 1871, one of the most devastating disasters in the 19th century, is a particularly compelling example. The fire killed hundreds of people, left one third of the city burned to the ground, and over a hundred thousand people homeless. FEMA was not there to direct the emergency response, and, in fact, because there was no income tax, people had no charitable tax-deduction incentive to give.
__
Despite the complete absence of federal aid, historians have documented how remarkably swift and extensive the relief effort was after the Great Chicago Fire. Donations from businesses, individuals, voluntary associations, and aid from small municipal governments arrived immediately and funded the entire recovery effort. A private charitable organization, the Chicago Relief and Aid Society, managed all of the contributions and coordinated the massive effort. Within a month after the fire, the Society built homes from scratch for over 30,000 people — complete with stoves, crockery, and bedding. Over the course of the following year, the Society supplied over 150,000 people with weekly rations, including fuel and fresh beef, administered over 70,000 free small pox vaccinations, assisted people in finding employment, and provided free transportation on the railroads for people seeking to relocate…

Shorter Skarbeks: Since it’s been proven that people who hate functional government will screw up government programs, how about you catastrophic luzers settle for a lovely Wal-Mart gift card and a one-way bus ticket to some coastal enclave where they haven’t yet realized that all taxation is theft? It worked out pretty well a century and a half ago, as far as we can tell, or care…

Glibertarians! — can’t live with ’em, can’t responsibly allow them to live in the kind of winner-take-all dystopias they so love to yammer about. Or, rather, force the rest of us to live in those dystopias, with the HOA enforcing shoot-to-kill security outside the gated communities of Galt Gulch and St. Ayn’s Haven.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « NY GOP Supporters of Bob Turner Send Out Islamophobic Mailer to Registered Voters in NY-9
Next Post: Two Drunks Leaning Against Each Other »

Reader Interactions

50Comments

  1. 1.

    Wag

    September 13, 2011 at 5:40 am

    Then again, it’s been well over a century since our country had an entire city burn to the ground after a cow kicked over a lantern. Are we lucky, or has there been some other major societal change?

    Oh yeah, governments began issuing strict building standards and began funding these things we call “Fire Departments”, both of which are in reality a means for the government to restrict freedom.

  2. 2.

    Ash Can

    September 13, 2011 at 5:53 am

    Wait, one of these brain-dead idiots is teaching at Duke? I thought Duke was a good school.

  3. 3.

    MariedeGournay

    September 13, 2011 at 6:02 am

    My question is, what the fuck would they actually do with this vaunted freedom they aspired to? I mean besides hide in their closet with a shot gun terrified of marauders?

  4. 4.

    Wag

    September 13, 2011 at 6:09 am

    My question is, what the fuck would they actually do with this vaunted freedom they aspired to? I mean besides hide in their closet with a shot gun terrified of marauders?

    Maraud around with shotguns terrifying ordinary citizens.

  5. 5.

    A Mom Anon

    September 13, 2011 at 6:14 am

    One,none of these freaking nutbars would want to actually live in the society they envision. They’re full of shit. People should follow them around,point,and laugh. Daily.

    Two,one of my best teachers in school always taught me to ask”and then what?”whenever I thought I had a great idea and to keep following that question. This was in the THIRD grade. For some reason Galtians can’t muster the mental energy to do that. I double dog dare one of them to EVER just keep asking that question,and be fucking realistic and coherent. Dare them.

  6. 6.

    Ben Cisco

    September 13, 2011 at 6:20 am

    Holy cow. (ba-dum-ching!)
    __
    Seriously, these are some seriously demented Luddites we’re dealing with here. Nice that they 1) used the example of Le Juge Spectacle Équestre re Katrina to make this argument and 2) made no mention of any similar failures for either the earthquake OR Irene.
    __
    Laissez les bons temps rouler!

  7. 7.

    aimai

    September 13, 2011 at 6:24 am

    I love that its considered a good sign that they forced lots of people onto trains to relocate. Yeah. That’s some great disaster relief planning right there.

    aimai

  8. 8.

    Villago Delenda Est

    September 13, 2011 at 6:25 am

    Center on Entrepreneurial Innovation at the Independent Institute

    This just screams pretentious asshattery. In flashing pink neon.

  9. 9.

    Villago Delenda Est

    September 13, 2011 at 6:27 am

    @Wag:

    There you go, bringing all those damned liberal facts into the debate, again.

  10. 10.

    PurpleGirl

    September 13, 2011 at 6:38 am

    Tradition or historical practices can be a good thing; however, just because something (relief aid) was done one way in the past does not mean that it can not be changed to something else in the future/present. An example for this would be the recent tornado season which saw several towns completely destroyed. What local resources would be able to be used in the case where all the churches (frequently cited as an organizing entity and leader in charity) in a town were destroyed, along with the whole commercial sector? When even the neighbors are reduced to nothing, where and how can the work begin to rebuild? And if several of these incidents happen at the same time, don’t the people need outside aid? Coordinated aid from FEMA means that time isn’t (or won’t) be wasted trying to put the pieces together.

    These authors just don’t want to pay taxes to help their fellow citizens. (Or themselves if their home is ever wiped out by an act of god/nature or Force majeure. Their insurance company won’t pay them a thin dime.)

  11. 11.

    Jim Pharo

    September 13, 2011 at 6:47 am

    Hard to see how one would allow a bright young person to study at a school like Duke if this is the calibre of thinker that might be allowed to teach there.

    If I want hackery, there’s always the Christian Broadcast Network School.

    Ya know, 4,000 years ago a great flood washed over the ENTIRE EARTH, and ya know who helped everybody right away with food and shelter an’ ponies and stuff? God, that’s who. Which proves EVERYTHING. So there.

  12. 12.

    Riggsveda

    September 13, 2011 at 6:58 am

    Sorry for the extended quote, but it’s worth it. Here is what the Encyclopedia of Chicago had to say about the charity in question—not exactly the fount of all blessings:

    The Chicago Relief and Aid Society, founded in 1851, sought to exercise a “scientific” and “disinterested” model of urban alms giving. Elite male Chicagoans modeled the institution on New York’s Association for Improving the Condition of the Poor—a pioneering alternative to what was viewed as the overly sentimental practices of early forms of benevolence, which encouraged sympathetic identification between the charity worker and the client. Practitioners of “scientific charity” believed in the rigorous investigation of all applicants by experts; only the “worthy poor”—those brought to a state of want through no fault of their own—should be granted temporary aid meant to restore them to self-sufficiency. Excessively generous support, it was believed, would instill habits of dependency.

    The Relief and Aid Society was one of dozens of sources for charity in Chicago in the mid-nineteenth century; others were run by Cook County, religious groups, ethnic associations, trade unions, and women’s committees. The society functioned on a relatively small scale until the Great Fire of 1871, when Mayor R. B. Mason, at the request of a delegation of prominent businessmen, designated this organization as the “official” agent for the distribution of millions of dollars of “fire relief.”

    Many acclaimed the society’s fire relief as a triumph of organization and system, while others bitterly complained that the suffering of many Chicagoans, particularly immigrant workers, too often was seen as beyond the pale of the society’s mission. The Relief and Aid Society closed the books on their fire relief effort with $600,000 of the funds donated to the city left unspent, having come to the conclusion that all “honest need” born of the fire had been addressed. This surplus provided an operating budget that allowed the organization to build a new headquarters and suspend all new fundraising until the mid-1880s. In 1909, the society was absorbed into the United Charities of Chicago.

  13. 13.

    4tehlulz

    September 13, 2011 at 7:11 am

    Right-wing professors singing the praise of xenophobic “charities.”

    Color me surprised.

  14. 14.

    MikeBoyScout

    September 13, 2011 at 7:16 am

    @12 Riggsveda:

    You dare to present facts in the face of Glibertarian dogma?
    One needs to believe that the Chicago Fire proves the point my friend.

  15. 15.

    PIGL

    September 13, 2011 at 7:24 am

    They make a game out of this….there is no institution, taboo or moral intuition that they can not take down (to their own smug self-satisfaction, at least) with a dose of contrarianism and free-marketism, and light-weight pseudo-intellectual bombast.

    Oy, fcku me, I hate these people.

  16. 16.

    ornery

    September 13, 2011 at 7:39 am

    Thank you, dear sweet Anne, for not putting up a sully link.

  17. 17.

    Southern Beale

    September 13, 2011 at 7:42 am

    @Villago Delenda Est:

    No they could do better. Maybe add a few “freedoms” and “liberties.”

    How about the Freedom Center on Entrepreneurial Innovation at the Independent Liberty Institute of America. And their logo better be adorned with American flags and the head of a bald eagle, a species that would be extinct were it not for the very government efforts they now claim are killing “job creators” and crushing innovation.

    Feh.

    I’m over the nutbags.

  18. 18.

    gnomedad

    September 13, 2011 at 7:58 am

    @Southern Beale:

    The Heartland Freedom Center on Entrepreneurial Innovation at the Independent Liberty Research Institute of Exceptional America

    Punched it up a bit for ya.

  19. 19.

    Tyro

    September 13, 2011 at 8:08 am

    Wait, one of these brain-dead idiots is teaching at Duke? I thought Duke was a good school.

    This is a guy who has a temporary desk in a multi-person office while he collaborates on a paper with another professor and teaches a class or two for a semester. He’s leveraging “Duke” to make himself sound important. It’s like calling himself “A scientist at IBM” because he came in for a month on contract to tweak the database of a research group.

    I really hate when people do this. I don’t use any temp jobs I’ve had in my titles.

  20. 20.

    BruinKid

    September 13, 2011 at 8:10 am

    Seriously, this is like the exact same argument a Ron Paul fan was making about getting rid of FEMA. And boy, he was adamant about it, saying things like “I can take care of myself”. Oh, and “I know better than to live in hurricane-prone areas”. This was during Irene. I asked him just when the hell New York City became a “hurricane-prone” area. He couldn’t answer that, and so accused me of not answering why Ron Paul isn’t “TEH AWESOMEST!!!”.

  21. 21.

    burnspbesq

    September 13, 2011 at 8:14 am

    @Ash Can:

    “Wait, one of these brain-dead idiots is teaching at Duke? I thought Duke was a good school.”

    Better that they teach at Duke than at that silly place down the road in Chappaheeya. Duke students are smart enough to see through this nonsense. If these people were to teach at Carolina, they would be believed.

  22. 22.

    honus

    September 13, 2011 at 8:57 am

    @burnspbesq: When you dookies say things like that about Carolina, I feel obliged to remind readers that Nixon and Lefty Driesell are Duke Alums, and that while Jesse Helms regularly referred to UNC “the University of Negroes and Communists” I never heard him go after Duke.
    Oh, and for the record, I attended UVA.

  23. 23.

    Belafon (formerly anonevent)

    September 13, 2011 at 8:58 am

    I’ll donate to their plane ticket to Somalia.

  24. 24.

    Mino

    September 13, 2011 at 8:59 am

    @burnspbesq: Might he be one of the Koch professors? They are insinuating them everywhere they can get a toehold.

  25. 25.

    Ben Cisco

    September 13, 2011 at 9:04 am

    @honus: What honus said.

  26. 26.

    honus

    September 13, 2011 at 9:11 am

    Given that David Addington, Elizabeth Dole, Ken Starr, Ron and Rand Paul, Ben Quayle are all dookies, I don’t think you have any room to be casting aspersions regarding the wingnut gullibility of UNC students. In fact, the Entreprenurial Innovation and Flag Liberty Eagle Institute seems to fit better in Durham than the Peoples Republic of Chapel hill.

  27. 27.

    clone12

    September 13, 2011 at 9:19 am

    It’s also funny how Glibertarians don’t mention this as the awesome invisible hand of the free market doing its awesome thing:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Memphis,_Tennessee#Yellow_fever_epidemic_-_1870s

    “So many people died or fled the epidemics that in 1879 Memphis lost its city charter, and until 1893 Memphis was governed as merely a taxing district.”

  28. 28.

    Nutella

    September 13, 2011 at 9:33 am

    C’mon, the “Independent Institute” is nonpartisan! They say so right here: http://www.independent.org/aboutus/

    /snicker

  29. 29.

    jwest

    September 13, 2011 at 9:42 am

    As always with liberals, lots of opinions, but not one person who knows what FEMA is, what it does, or what the structure of disaster response is in this country.

    Why not use this subject as an opportunity to actually gain knowledge and be informed?

  30. 30.

    RalfW

    September 13, 2011 at 9:52 am

    Can all these bastard Glibertarians just move to Texas this instant, for the glory of all: to life free, armed, and dehydrated?

  31. 31.

    RSA

    September 13, 2011 at 9:55 am

    Gotta love libertarian cherry picking. Galveston, TX, was devastated by a hurricane in 1900, also well before the establishment of FEMA, and never recovered.

    Wait, one of these brain-dead idiots is teaching at Duke?

    A visiting assistant professorship can be a courtesy appointment, to accompany short-term lecturing responsibilities.

  32. 32.

    cmorenc

    September 13, 2011 at 10:00 am

    @Ash Can:

    Wait, one of these brain-dead idiots is teaching at Duke? I thought Duke was a good school.

    Duke’s business school is named the “fuck-you school of business”. OK, well not quite, but almost: it’s the Fuqua School of Business”, but the similarity kind of jumps out at you, doesn’t it?

  33. 33.

    Nutella

    September 13, 2011 at 10:00 am

    OT item: “It’s like Washington crossing the Delaware to go to Hooters”

  34. 34.

    grandpajohn

    September 13, 2011 at 10:03 am

    @Jim Pharo:

    @<a and ya know who helped everybody right away with food and shelter an’ ponies and stuff?

    Well since all the survivors were all on one boat, not a lot of relief help was actually needed

  35. 35.

    Nutella

    September 13, 2011 at 10:04 am

    @Nutella:

    And isn’t that a worse desecration of the flag than burning it to make a political point?

  36. 36.

    CarolDuhart

    September 13, 2011 at 11:04 am

    @Riggsveda: This is why you start to see the various immigrant benevolent groups start to form, the growth of lodges, and insurance and banking groups that were formed to help immigrants. Think of Jewish Appeals, black-owned insurance companies, and expanded lodges. Don’t even begin to talk about the machine politicians who would hand out turkeys and aid in exchange for a vote, which they usually were able to get.

  37. 37.

    Judas Escargot

    September 13, 2011 at 11:23 am

    Je te presente: Emily and David.

    Clearly a couple of rugged individualists and survivors, ready to take on all the challenges of the harsh cruel real world once the onus of a social safety net is removed.

    Why, Emily even had to wait in line for her latte for a full ten minutes once! And while David has never field-dressed a moose, he’s very good at peeling the wrappers off of Snickers bars.

  38. 38.

    Ben Cisco

    September 13, 2011 at 11:24 am

    @Judas Escargot:

    Why, Emily even had to wait in line for her latte for a full ten minutes once! A while David has never field-dressed a moose, he’s very good at peeling the wrappers off of Snickers bars.

    OK, where do you want your internets?

  39. 39.

    Yutsano

    September 13, 2011 at 11:27 am

    @Judas Escargot: The token brown guy is a nice touch. It’d be interesting to see what all he’s been allowed to publish, if anything.

  40. 40.

    Bruce S

    September 13, 2011 at 11:33 am

    A good ‘un on capital gains tax…

    http://titanicsailsatdawn.blogspot.com/2011/09/capital-gains-capitol-games-how-rich.html

  41. 41.

    piratedan

    September 13, 2011 at 12:04 pm

    @burnspbesq: while support of your alma mater is laudable, you should know better than to paint with broad brushes in this room. I’m sure that there’s more than a couple of douchenozzles that graduated from Chapel Hill, but also fairly confident Durham can add a few of its own. Instead of defending the perfidy, you can let the alumni association folks know that you’re check won’t be in the mail until they stop associating with these fly by nighters?

  42. 42.

    Mike G

    September 13, 2011 at 12:05 pm

    Shorter Dukesbag:
    A fire that burned down a third of Chicago and killed hundreds of people was a triumph of the free market.

    And of all these right-wing assholes touting private charity relief, how many do you think have ever made a meaningful contribution to a charity? They want people with more of a conscience than they have to donate money and put in the work, while they contribute nothing.

  43. 43.

    28 Percent

    September 13, 2011 at 1:14 pm

    Anne Laurie if that is youre real name you are trying to distract us from the REAL ISSUE which is that the commie nazi so called President obama is bowing to Republican pressure to make government more responsible to the PEOPLE by having a new website to allow people to petition the goverment but we REAL AMERICANS know it is all a lie it will no doubt be people like you at BJ so called who will petition for a National Recipe Registrationn to make us all eat the same food or for other “policies” you want you never know when to stop do you?

  44. 44.

    jl

    September 13, 2011 at 1:19 pm

    @Riggsveda:

    Thanks for the link to the Encyclopedia of Chicago. Looks like it is a respectable site, run in part by Northwestern University.

    ‘The Relief and Aid Society was one of dozens of sources for charity in Chicago in the mid-nineteenth century; others were run by Cook County, religious groups, ethnic associations, trade unions, and women’s committees. The society functioned on a relatively small scale until the Great Fire of 1871, when Mayor R. B. Mason, at the request of a delegation of prominent businessmen, designated this organization as the “official” agent for the distribution of millions of dollars of “fire relief.”

    note: emphasis added

    I have one comment: Look at the parts I bolded above. Obviously, whatever the other advantages or disadvantages of their efforts, the ability of the Relief and Aid Society to bring a large quantity of resources to bear on the aftermath of the fire was NOT a spontaneous response of private enterprise or charity.

    First, the Chicago County government and trade unions were prominent funders of other relief efforts. Second, the City of Chicago (note: that is a government) sponsored the Society, enabling it to attract needed funds.

    So, seems to me that the whole argument that spontaneous action of free enterprise and private charity worked after the Chicago Fire is BS.

  45. 45.

    28 Percent

    September 13, 2011 at 1:21 pm

    @honus: Wahoowa!

  46. 46.

    jl

    September 13, 2011 at 1:35 pm

    Also, as for an informed discussion of what FEMA does. Well, a lot of what it does is to coordinate local and regional public and private first responder and emergency resources that are on call for emergencies.

    These resources are mainly human resources, which include local fire and paramedics, and private volunteers (engineers, public health experts, logistics experts, etc).

    What FEMA provides is the equipment and pays for the time spent training for the volunteers from the private sector (though not for local public government personnel training).

    When an emergency occurs, FEMA coordinates the response, which is necessary since the local teams have different areas of expertise (demolition and construction of short run infrastructure, fire fighting, rescue and recovery, disease control, etc.)

    In other words, a lot of what FEMA does is sort of what the City of Chicago did, when it decided to authorize the Relief Agency as the official body in charge of the emergency response.

    If there is a possibility of very large emergencies that can overwhelm local governments (as was the case in the SF Earthquake in 1906, or the Great Mississippi Flood, or Katrina) depending on local organizations, public or private, will be useless.

    A final comment on the article: in those days, local governments were NOT small. They were bigger, relative to local and regional businesses and corporations and voluntary associations than they are today. Remember, this was the age of big city and country machines.

  47. 47.

    jl

    September 13, 2011 at 1:43 pm

    Also, too, when you read glowing reports of how a city miraculously rose from the ashes back in the day, you need to look into whether the history is true.

    City and county governments were more powerful, had more influence with the local press, and more intertwined with local business. News reports were happied up to prevent a recent disaster from hurting the local economic recovery that business and local government leaders desperately needed.

    The SF earthquake comes to mind. The absurd estimate that the earthquake and subsequent fire killed less than 400 people is an example. That was an idiotic estimate local leaders pulled out of their ass. They may have gotten it by dividing the probable toll of almost 4,0000 (which was roughly known at the time) by ten.

    And of course, that story itself calls into question the idea that local businesses and local governments, are the exemplars of efficiency, honesty and transparency that this column asserts that they are.

    I saw no references at all in the column to justify any of its assertions. It was just a string of assertions.

  48. 48.

    jl

    September 13, 2011 at 1:52 pm

    Oops, that 4,0000 above should be 4,000 (though I guess the typo is obvious)

  49. 49.

    CarolDuhart

    September 13, 2011 at 5:08 pm

    @Wag: And stricter zoning requiements. Buildings have to have a minimum amount of space between them, both sides, front and back. and the adjoining streets have to be a certain width as well. Chimneys have requirements, stoves have requirements.Certain kinds of buildings have to have fire extinguishers and even sprinkler systems. There’s regular trash pickup, so materials that burn can’t accumulate in big dry piles of kindling. Government is responsible for all of these regulations, enforced by fine or even in a few cases, imprisonment. That strictness has not only saved lives, but money, as there are fewer fires to have to put out and fewer people to rescue and fewer businesses that go out of business due to fire.

    Glibertarians would have us go back to the days of shoddy building materials and houses back to back with barely enough room for air to get through. Catch-as-catch can garbage collection, so someone who can’t get their garbage collected everyday and can’t take it to the landfill ends up accumulating quite a pile of kindling-a fire in waiting with only luck to keep it from starting.

    They think that an elderly 90 year old woman in her falling-apart home can take the garbage to the landfill by herself. That rugged individualism can keep the streets cleaned and fires fought by profit. Even if there’s no profit to be had in situations like rural towns and poor neighborhoods where there’s no profit to be had ever, but where fires could easily spread to the profitable parts of town.

  50. 50.

    Wag

    September 13, 2011 at 6:49 pm

    @CarolDuhart:

    That was my point. thanks for expanding upon it.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • SiubhanDuinne on Thursday Morning Open Thread: Short Week, for Some (Jun 8, 2023 @ 8:43am)
  • Manyakitty on Thursday Morning Open Thread: Short Week, for Some (Jun 8, 2023 @ 8:41am)
  • Josie on Thursday Morning Open Thread: Short Week, for Some (Jun 8, 2023 @ 8:40am)
  • Baud on Thursday Morning Open Thread: Short Week, for Some (Jun 8, 2023 @ 8:40am)
  • Manyakitty on Thursday Morning Open Thread: Short Week, for Some (Jun 8, 2023 @ 8:39am)

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Seattle Meetup on Sat 5/13 at 5pm!

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!