• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

They punch you in the face and then start crying because their fist hurts.

Peak wingnut was a lie.

Conservatism: there are people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

People identifying as christian while ignoring christ and his teachings is a strange thing indeed.

Hey hey, RFK, how many kids did you kill today?

Give the craziest people you know everything they want and hope they don’t ask for more? Great plan.

But frankly mr. cole, I’ll be happier when you get back to telling us to go fuck ourselves.

Impressively dumb. Congratulations.

I desperately hope that, yet again, i am wrong.

Reality always lies in wait for … Democrats.

Everything is totally normal and fine!!!

Russian mouthpiece, go fuck yourself.

America is going up in flames. The NYTimes fawns over MAGA celebrities. No longer a real newspaper.

Republicans: The threats are dire, but my tickets are non-refundable!

Never entrust democracy to any process that requires Republicans to act in good faith.

Let’s not be the monsters we hate.

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires.

The line between political reporting and fan fiction continues to blur.

Boeing: repeatedly making the case for high speed rail.

Jesus watching the most hateful people claiming to be his followers

They traffic in fear. it is their only currency. if we are fearful, they are winning.

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

If a good thing happens for a bad reason, it’s still a good thing.

“Can i answer the question? No you can not!”

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / An Unexamined Scandal / Score Another One For The Blockheads

Score Another One For The Blockheads

by Zandar|  November 25, 20118:18 am| 18 Comments

This post is in: An Unexamined Scandal, Republican Venality, The Party of Fiscal Responsibility, Decline and Fall, Teabagger Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

The GOP has refused to allow President Obama’s Medicare/Medicaid program head to even get a vote in the Senate, threatening to filibuster every attempt, and that means a year after his recess appointment, Donald Berwick is out.  Brian Beutler:

In reality Berwick is a casualty of the ongoing partisan fight over social insurance. Nominally this is the fight over “deficits” and “debt”, but much more accurately it’s a dispute about the nature of key safety net programs like Medicare, Medicaid, and, soon, the new health care law. The irony is that Berwick is best known, and widely respected, for his academic work on making the U.S. health care system more efficient — i.e. how to save people, businesses, and the government money, and simultaneously improve patient care. If the continuing fight over deficits was really about deficits, Berwick would have broad, bipartisan support to continue his work. Instead his curtailed tenure serves as an illustration of the fact that the fight about budget deficits doesn’t really have anything to do with deficits at all.

More importantly, Berwick actually proving that the basic tenets of the new health care law could actually work would be a disaster for the GOP.  If it’s allowed to work, Republicans are toast. They know this, so “Obamacare” has to fail before 2014 and the system kicks into full throttle.  The opposition to it is driving their base and they want to manufacture as much outrage as possible between now and next November.

It was a “national crisis” when Berwick was appointed in the first place, remember?

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Late Night Open Thread
Next Post: I’ve Got Your Button Right Here »

Reader Interactions

18Comments

  1. 1.

    Schlemizel

    November 25, 2011 at 8:29 am

    Come on, we all know both sides do it. Count on the WashingtonWhore Post to remind us of that.

  2. 2.

    lawguy

    November 25, 2011 at 8:44 am

    What is required is more compromise by Obama. He needs to reach out to the republicans and appoint Newt Gigrich.

  3. 3.

    Murc

    November 25, 2011 at 8:52 am

    Can anyone explain why he has to leave? What’s to stop Obama from re-upping him? Congress is about to go into holiday recess after all.

    I mean, maybe Berwick doesn’t WANT to stay on. But as far as I know there’s nothing illegal about rolling a recess appointment over, is there?

  4. 4.

    Mark S.

    November 25, 2011 at 8:57 am

    @Schlemizel:

    It’s true. Remember what the Democrats did to judicial moderate Robert Bork?

    This quote kills me:

    Since sperm is sold freely in the United States, much more freely than in other nations, there are lesbian couples raising children. It takes little imagination to know how the children will be indoctrinated.

    Robert Bork must be a legal expert on sperm selling laws around the world. He would have been such an addition to the Court.

  5. 5.

    xian

    November 25, 2011 at 9:00 am

    it takes little imagination, fortunately

  6. 6.

    Tom Levenson

    November 25, 2011 at 9:06 am

    Remember that this has been the Republican strategy on everything, not just health care. Say what you like about Geithner (and I could say plenty), the fact that he had to run Treasury with essentially no senior aides for many, many months was the result of GOPsters trying to make sure that the Obama administration from the start would be unable to govern.

    In other contexts, such assaults on the basic function of American governance would have a very nasty name. But I would never want to put myself in the way of a Moore award, so…

  7. 7.

    Svensker

    November 25, 2011 at 9:08 am

    @Murc:

    To remain in effect a recess appointment must be approved by the Senate by the end of the next session of Congress, or the position becomes vacant again; in current practice this means that a recess appointment must be approved by roughly the end of the next calendar year.

    Wiki

  8. 8.

    Soonergrunt

    November 25, 2011 at 9:13 am

    @Murc: Nothing at all. There is absolutely no reason why the President couldn’t re-recess-appoint him.

  9. 9.

    Maude

    November 25, 2011 at 9:17 am

    @Soonergrunt:
    Good to know. I hope Obama does reappoint him.

  10. 10.

    Schlemizel

    November 25, 2011 at 9:52 am

    @Mark S.:

    That tidbit about Bork would make a great straight line to set up a homophobic punchline explaining how he would know the sperm market around the world. In deference to my gay friends I’ll let it pass.
    @Maude:
    Yeah I do too but he won’t because it would be ‘unseemly’ and not very bipartisany of him.
    @Tom Levenson:
    The Republicans ‘win’ when government fails. The fact that America loses when government fails is not part of their equation. They make hay by pretending the government is completely unable to do anything but kill people. In order to maintain this bullshit they really need to make sure competent people do are not allowed to run things. Thats easy when they are in power (“Brownie, you’re doing a heck of a job,”) but rests on this sort of obstruction when they are not.

  11. 11.

    Wag

    November 25, 2011 at 10:06 am

    @Tom Levenson:

    I’ll go there for you.

    TREASONOUS GOP BASTARDS!!!!!!

    I feel better now

    Of course this would never have happened if Obama hadn’t insisted on appointing some pointy headed Professor from some university that none has ever heard from.

  12. 12.

    Kola Noscopy

    November 25, 2011 at 10:32 am

    Of course this little drama is exactly NOWHERE in the headlines and as a major topic of discussion.

    Among other epic failings, the Dems including Obama totally fail at messaging and communication. Just utterly suck.

    They are awesome, however, at playing the victim and pretending to reluctantly acquiesce to Repuke demands and machinations.

  13. 13.

    henqiguai

    November 25, 2011 at 10:47 am

    @Soonergrunt (#8):

    There is absolutely no reason why the President couldn’t re-recess-appoint him.

    Except the Senate no longer goes in Recess. There is always someone from the other party on hand to gavel the Senate into session just long enough to meet the legal requirement(s) for in-session. Then they adjourn for the day.

  14. 14.

    Elizabelle

    November 25, 2011 at 11:15 am

    @henqiguai:

    Interesting, because how does Berwick’s deputy Marilyn Tavenner (whom Obama plans to appoint) get through? I guess a hearing.

    She’s a nurse, and was Virginia’s Secretary of Health and Human Services during Tim Kaine’s administration.

    NYTimes calls her less “visionary” than Berwick; more of a manager.

    So she gets a hearing, I hope.

    Which should make Senator John Barrasso (also physician John Barrasso) happy.

    But Senator John Barrasso, Republican of Wyoming, said: “Dr. Berwick came in under a cloud, and he is leaving under the same cloud, because of the way the president appointed him. It was a disservice to Dr. Berwick and to the American people for the president to make a recess appointment, rather than requiring Dr. Berwick to come before Congress to explain his opinions on Medicare, Medicaid and the new health care law.”

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/24/health/policy/dr-donald-m-berwick-resigns-as-head-of-medicare-and-medicaid.html

    Berwick was under a cloud because put him before the Senate, he’d make sense and the GOP can’t have any of that.

    It’s a disservice to the American people that the GOP won’t allow Obama’s nominees an up or down vote.

  15. 15.

    Mnemosyne

    November 25, 2011 at 11:52 am

    @Soonergrunt:

    Nothing at all. There is absolutely no reason why the President couldn’t re-recess-appoint him.

    I’m not sure I agree with you 100 percent on your police work there, Lou. I’m pretty sure you can’t recess appoint the same person twice if they’re not confirmed by the Senate.

    When we kept telling people that having Obama recess-appoint everyone wasn’t going to actually solve the problem of having too many vacancies, this is why.

  16. 16.

    Judas Escargot

    November 25, 2011 at 12:37 pm

    @Schlemizel:

    The Republicans ‘win’ when government fails. The fact that America loses when government fails is not part of their equation.

    I’ve come around to the view that the explicit goal is to carve America up, and sell off the pieces. Nothing else fits the available data.

    In a sane world, a political party that got perhaps as much as 2/3rds of its political donations for 2010 from foreign business interests, laundered by the Chamber of Commerce (thank you, Citizens’ United) would generally be called suspicious. If that same party then took active steps to dismantle the country’s infrastructure, cripple its economy, bankrupt its middle class, depress working class wages to near-slavery levels, and de-staff some of its most important agencies, it would be called treasonous.

    But it’s not a sane world, of course. Must be civil.

  17. 17.

    kay

    November 25, 2011 at 3:12 pm

    @Elizabelle:

    The NYTimes are part of the problem. They continue to repeat the nonsense that conservatives opposed Berwick because conservatives objected to single sentence that Berwick uttered in the course of his long, long career as an advocate and expert on high quality health care delivery.

    That isn’t true. That isn’t why conservatives opposed Berwick. The NYTimes knows it isn’t true, because anyone who read the full statement or has read anything longer than a blurb on Berwick knows it isn’t true. They shouldn’t keep printing it because it isn’t true. This isn’t difficult. Don’t print things that aren’t true. If the NYTimes is incapable of printing a simple declaration of the facts on Donald Berwick, and instead insist on printing the GOP lies about Berwick in the first paragraph of the piece, they can’t cover this story ethically, because they’re misleading people.

    I think Americans won on this one, despite the constant distortions by media and conservatives. Berwick really is a visionary leader on health care, and he’ll be able to hand off his vision (actualized) to an operations-type person.

    Americans got most of the benefit of someone like Berwick, despite media and conservative opposition to someone like Berwick.

    This isn’t a bad template for liberals. Get the most bang out of the visionary, which is ideas (Warren, or Berwick) and then hand off to the operations person (Cordray, or Berwick’s replacement).

    We need a workable plan top get around media and conservative opposition to really talented people in public service, because merit doesn’t matter, and what people actually say or believe doesn’t matter. We want really talented people. Media and conservatives are all upset and rattled by really talented people. What to do? How to get around that?

    If we don’t get better at this, we’re going to be stuck with mediocre and/or industry-captured people in public service, because mediocre/industry captured appointees are the only people media and conservatives will accept without kicking up a huge hissy fit.

    So. Put in the visionary for a year, or however long “we” can, and then when media and conservatives chase off the visionary/uniquely talented person, he or she wil be ready to hand off to an operations person anyway.

    An example: there’s no daylight between Richard Cordray and Elizabeth Warren, ideologically, but Cordray is probably better suited to run a regulatory agency, because he was a prosecutor and he ran two different state agencies. We got the best of Elizabeth Warren (her idea) before media and conservative opposition to Elizabeth Warren succeeded in running her off.

    We also got Elizabeth Warren as a candidate, but I don’t know that we’ll always get that lucky :)

    I do love Donald Berwick, though. He did his job despite constant lies and smears directed at him by media and conservatives. I don’t know how people manage that, but they do. I would be crazy-angry and then sink into “bitter and cynical”, and I would get as far from good-faith public service as I could, because good work simply isn’t rewarded.

    Berwick is an international expert and physician. His work has intrinsic and measurable value outside the political realm. He didn’t have to take this crappy job, and he didn’t have to sit there and listen to a year and a half of absolute bullshit smearing his work and his character, but he did. Must have been a labor of love.

  18. 18.

    kay

    November 25, 2011 at 3:37 pm

    @Kola Noscopy:

    Among other epic failings, the Dems including Obama totally fail at messaging and communication. Just utterly suck.

    I generally agree with you, but the coverage of the health care law was so bad I think it’s better media don’t cover it anymore. I don’t know why they don’t cover it (because it’s boring? it is boring! true!) but I honestly think it will go better if people encounter the health care law in their own lives, instead of as a “debate” between “competing ideas” or whatever the fuck this horrible coverage has been. The PPACA isn’t a “roundtable”. It’s a statute. They’re going to encounter it personally, one at a time, not as a theory.

    They may like it, they may hate it, as applied, but at least they’ll know what it really is.

    First Do No Harm is my new approach to information. They were doing harm. Better they don’t cover it AT ALL than mislead and confuse.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Image by MomSense (5/21.25)

Recent Comments

  • Torrey on On The Road – JanieM – Car Bits (May 21, 2025 @ 11:00am)
  • NotMax on Parsing the Pandemic Pause (May 21, 2025 @ 10:59am)
  • zhena gogolia on Parsing the Pandemic Pause (May 21, 2025 @ 10:56am)
  • Professor Bigfoot on Parsing the Pandemic Pause (May 21, 2025 @ 10:55am)
  • Jackie on Parsing the Pandemic Pause (May 21, 2025 @ 10:54am)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!