• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

They’re not red states to be hated; they are voter suppression states to be fixed.

Ah, the different things are different argument.

Today’s GOP: why go just far enough when too far is right there?

Their freedom requires your slavery.

Wow, I can’t imagine what it was like to comment in morse code.

Why is it so hard for them to condemn hate?

Teach a man to fish, and he’ll sit in a boat all day drinking beer.

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

“Squeaker” McCarthy

It may be funny to you motherfucker, but it’s not funny to me.

Second rate reporter says what?

You cannot shame the shameless.

You can’t attract Republican voters. You can only out organize them.

Innocent people don’t delay justice.

They are lying in pursuit of an agenda.

Bad news for Ron DeSantis is great news for America.

JFC, are there no editors left at that goddamn rag?

Take your GOP plan out of the witness protection program.

Happy indictment week to all who celebrate!

Prediction: the GOP will rethink its strategy of boycotting future committees.

Republicans in disarray!

“Jesus paying for the sins of everyone is an insult to those who paid for their own sins.”

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Don’t expect peaches from an apple tree.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Never Go to England

Never Go to England

by $8 blue check mistermix|  August 5, 20137:42 am| 58 Comments

This post is in: Both Sides Do It!

FacebookTweetEmail

Jim Messina is learning the Bob Shrum lesson: England is where US political operatives go to fuck up their good reputations (or, in Shrum’s case, to confirm their bad ones). Now that Messina is consulting for David Cameron, this ad he made for the 2002 Montana Senate race, where he ran Baucus’ campaign, is getting some unwanted attention. As one of the YouTube commenters said, I’m not sure if it’s homophobic or 70’s-phobic, but it’s being described as homophobic in the British press.

That 2002 campaign does sound like a real shitshow:

Messina will go a long way to win, as the two leading stories from his Montana career suggest. Both involve the 2002 Senate race he ran for Baucus, a Democrat seeking reelection in a terrible year for Democrats. To protect Baucus, Messina had him refuse to participate in any debate that didn’t also include a fringe third-party candidate who’d inadvertently dyed his skin blue with homemade antibiotics—a guaranteed distraction.

The other story involved his Republican challenger, a state senator named Mike Taylor, who was the target of an ad so devastating it got national attention. The ad charged Taylor with having embezzled student loans from a cosmetology school he’d owned in the 1980s. But its force lay in the music and imagery. Set to a porn soundtrack, it featured snippets of an old television ad for Taylor’s hair salon that showed the candidate clad in a medallioned, open-shirted disco outfit, massaging lotion into another man’s face, and then appearing to reach toward the man’s crotch, as a narrator intoned, “Not the way we do business in Montana.”

“Jim is tough,” Baucus says. “I’ll never forget when he showed me that ad. We were in Bozeman in a motel. The curtains were drawn. He said, ‘Max, what do you think?’ They were afraid I wasn’t going to like it. I loved it!” […]

It might seem surprising that Messina is consulting for the Tories but really how different is that from running Max Baucus’ campaign?

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Monday Morning Open Thread: Clown Car Redux
Next Post: Hijab »

Reader Interactions

58Comments

  1. 1.

    Eric

    August 5, 2013 at 7:55 am

    Cash is king

  2. 2.

    Baud

    August 5, 2013 at 7:56 am

    Baucus won, so Messina knows what he’s doing, I guess. I read that he signed onto Hillary’s pre-campaign.

  3. 3.

    smintheus

    August 5, 2013 at 7:58 am

    Britain has very different electorates, different institutions, different styles and lengths of campaigns, and British attitudes and sensibilities are pretty different from Americans’. US political consultants and pundits usually end up on some of those rocks when they saunter over to ply their wares.

    Put another way, if he had any sense he’d realize that Cameron is already foundering and the Tories’ coalition partner is about as popular as the clap.

  4. 4.

    Warren Terra

    August 5, 2013 at 7:59 am

    The thing is, Cameron really is awful. Closing libraries; instituting swingeing tuitions; privatizing the royal mail; slashing benefits for the poor, the sick, the halt, the lame – he is genuinely doing a lot of damage, which can happen with an essentially unicameral legislature that is also the executive, especially when the other party is splintered, discredited by war and by having embraced the bankers (heck, they just went to war with their country’s biggest union, for reasons that rather disappear once you look at them closely). Cameron is not someone a Democratic consultant should be working for, even a Democratic consultant who previously worked for Max Baucus.

    Honestly, if he’s going to sell out he shoulda gone big – Philip Morris, maybe, or Halliburton.

  5. 5.

    Warren Terra

    August 5, 2013 at 8:01 am

    @smintheus:

    Cameron is already foundering

    I hope you’re right – but (as an American who follows British news a bit) – Cameron seems far more popular than any of his policies, and more importantly the opposition has completely disappeared up its own backside. Do you really think Milliband can get the job?

  6. 6.

    Eric

    August 5, 2013 at 8:03 am

    @Warren Terra: Those companies already own the gop. They dont need messina

  7. 7.

    Chyron HR

    August 5, 2013 at 8:11 am

    To protect Baucus, Messina had him refuse to participate in any debate that didn’t also include a fringe third-party candidate who’d inadvertently dyed his skin blue

    You are now reading this in Ron Howard’s voice.

  8. 8.

    rda909

    August 5, 2013 at 8:23 am

    @Baud: I don’t think Messina is part of Team Inevitable. A couple of other former Obama workers are, but not Messina.

    The ad: It would’ve been political malfeasance not to use that video. The focus is on the fraud this guy supposedly committed. Not homophobic at all. Just did a search and lo and behold, looks like this dust-up about the ad was being pumped last year by who else but David Sirota. Anything to rip Obama about, Sirota is there, and even just makes stuff up if need be.

  9. 9.

    smintheus

    August 5, 2013 at 8:23 am

    @Warren Terra: Miliband is about the only thing Cameron has going for him. But Brits vote in parliamentary elections less often than we think for party leaders, more often for local issues. And there’s nothing more local than the depressing economy and shrinking wages all over the UK. The Tories said they could make things better and they’ve made them worse; they’ll have a tough time convincing voters that prosperity is just around the corner. Recall that the GOP tried to portray Roosevelt as a lightweight political dilletante in ’32, but after 3 years of no improvement the public was ready to try almost anything. If Labor can get organized, they could send Cameron packing.

  10. 10.

    Ben Cisco

    August 5, 2013 at 8:24 am

    C.R.E.A.M. doesn’t always rise to the top.

  11. 11.

    dmsilev

    August 5, 2013 at 8:27 am

    To protect Baucus, Messina had him refuse to participate in any debate that didn’t also include a fringe third-party candidate who’d inadvertently dyed his skin blue with homemade antibiotics—a guaranteed distraction.

    I think I remember that. The guy was ‘treating’ himself with colloidal silver, which was supposed to cure something or another but also does have that blue-staining tendency.

    Oh, and I think ‘fringe third-party’ was ‘Libertarian’.

  12. 12.

    Cassidy

    August 5, 2013 at 8:33 am

    This is somehow Obama’s fault. We should exterminate the English Bulldog in retaliation. For what I don’t know, but ‘Merica.

  13. 13.

    Double nickel

    August 5, 2013 at 8:34 am

    Whatever happened to his pal Loggins?

  14. 14.

    dr. bloor

    August 5, 2013 at 8:35 am

    Maybe the ad was a commentary on Taylor’s lousy production values.

  15. 15.

    Botsplainer

    August 5, 2013 at 8:35 am

    @Chyron HR:

    You are now reading this in Ron Howard’s voice.

    Nicely played. I envisioned the stair truck stopping in front of a non-descript strip mall used as Baucus campaign headquarters, festooned with signs on the windows, with Lindsey stepping out…

  16. 16.

    Patricia Kayden

    August 5, 2013 at 8:48 am

    @Chyron HR: Would have loved to have watched those debates and to have learned exactly what the blue-skinned gentleman was advocating for. Only in America!

  17. 17.

    aimai

    August 5, 2013 at 8:48 am

    I really don’t see the ad as particularly homophobic–the guys have pornstaches but then everyone did in the 1970’s. Frankly, if anyone had that footage it would have been political malpractice not to use it–like the image Rumproast kept using of Mitt Romney snapping on blue rubber gloves in the candy store during a photo op. Some things are just too funny–wide lapels, 70’s suits, not to be used in a campaign.

  18. 18.

    aimai

    August 5, 2013 at 8:48 am

    @Patricia Kayden: Blue skinned gentlemen? Surely not only in America. Could have been Woad.

  19. 19.

    gene108

    August 5, 2013 at 8:56 am

    Meh…British Tories are still more liberal than Max Baucus…

  20. 20.

    Omnes Omnibus

    August 5, 2013 at 8:59 am

    @Cassidy: I was away from my computer all weekend so I didn’t see the shots how until last night. Is your goal really to pattern your commenting after the David Koch guy?

  21. 21.

    Omnes Omnibus

    August 5, 2013 at 9:01 am

    @Omnes Omnibus: “shots how” should be “shitshow.” Fucking autocorrect.

  22. 22.

    Wag

    August 5, 2013 at 9:08 am

    Oh noes! Messina used really embarrassing footage of his candidate’s opponent (shot by said opponent) in a substantive ad that effectively ridiculed the opponent, all wrapped in a package with pretty good production values and humor Whatever shall we do?

    This is a nothingburger of a controversy

    Except for the fact that Messina is working for Cameron.

  23. 23.

    Elizabelle

    August 5, 2013 at 9:08 am

    @Omnes Omnibus:

    Happy birthday week, Omnes.

    Rumor has it …

  24. 24.

    Cassidy

    August 5, 2013 at 9:14 am

    @Omnes Omnibus: Just doing my part. It takes a village.

  25. 25.

    gogol's wife

    August 5, 2013 at 9:23 am

    @Omnes Omnibus:

    I thought it was something like green ideas sleep furiously or whatever that was.

    When are our signatures going to remain so I don’t have to keep typing every comment twice after it refuses to let me submit?

  26. 26.

    Just One More Canuck

    August 5, 2013 at 9:24 am

    @Cassidy: “takes a village” to mock an idiot?

  27. 27.

    Omnes Omnibus

    August 5, 2013 at 9:25 am

    @Cassidy: Of course, you realize that you aren’t making the problem any better, right? I’ll stop being a hall monitor/ombudsman now. Do what you gotta do.

  28. 28.

    weaselone

    August 5, 2013 at 9:30 am

    I am not naive enough to believe that Baucus or Messina were unaware that this add taps into both 70s phobia and homophobia, but the main thrust of this add is good old fashioned sleaze. Taylor embezzled money. He’s a crook. Now here’s some bonus footage of him cleverly edited to make it look like he’s practicing the world’s oldest profession.

  29. 29.

    rea

    August 5, 2013 at 9:30 am

    I never understood why that ad was supposedly homophobic. Did the guy really look like that? Yes. Do gays look like that? Well, maybe some did back in the 70’s, but no more than anyone else–it wasn’t a particularly gay look. The assumption behind calling it a homophobic ad seems to be that the guy looked ridiculous, and therefore looked gay–that’s a homophobic assumption itself.

  30. 30.

    NickT

    August 5, 2013 at 9:34 am

    Clearly not the finest hour for principled political discussion by virtuous statesmen, but I don’t think the ad is homophobic. It looks more like mockery of Taylor’s questionable past with a strong hint of once a crook, always a crook.

  31. 31.

    Sister Rail Gun of Warm Humanitarianism

    August 5, 2013 at 9:39 am

    @gogol’s wife: Colorless green ideas sleep furiously.

    @rea: A man running a beauty salon and cosmetology school? That’s one of the biggest stereotypes out there. A lot of people of my generation (or older) would never make it to the student loan fraud.

  32. 32.

    mistermix

    August 5, 2013 at 9:46 am

    @gogol’s wife: I just changed a setting that should help with keeping your email/url/etc.

  33. 33.

    Cassidy

    August 5, 2013 at 9:50 am

    @Omnes Omnibus: Who said that’s what I’m trying to do. And why is it suddenly a problem now? This kind of toxic thread derailment has been going on for a while and it’s been made clear that this is what they want. I’m happy to be a team player.

  34. 34.

    Yatsuno

    August 5, 2013 at 10:05 am

    @Ben Cisco: All that made me think of was the Prince song. I have no idea why.

  35. 35.

    jenn

    August 5, 2013 at 10:07 am

    @Cassidy: Man, am I glad I missed those threads, hearing about them has been bad enough. But seriously, who is “they” in your comment above? ‘Cause “they” sure doesn’t include me! Thread derailment kind of stinks, and given that I’ve enjoyed your comments in the past, I really don’t want to add your nym to the list of Those I Scroll Past Without Reading!

  36. 36.

    mantooth

    August 5, 2013 at 10:09 am

    Tell ’em, Avi.

  37. 37.

    Omnes Omnibus

    August 5, 2013 at 10:28 am

    @Cassidy: I said my piece above.

  38. 38.

    MomSense

    August 5, 2013 at 10:37 am

    @Cassidy:

    I don’t think this tactic of yours is working. First, the only comment I made in those threads was to recount an experience I had with a pit bull in which it almost killed my dog. I acknowledged that I am emotional about it and not fully objective. I laid the blame squarely with irresponsible owners and breeders and never called for “genocide”. Had we discussed pit bulls in the six months after the attack when my dog’s eye wouldn’t close and I had to apply drops constantly because his eye was dry and irritated or when the skin on his neck was dying and he had to have repeated surgeries and skin grafts, or when my kids would cry because they were traumatized by seeing the attack–I guarantee you I would not have been willing to even discuss it. The fury and other emotions were way too raw at that point. I also guarantee you that if my dog had not put his body between that vicious dog and my children, and one of my children had been maimed or killed – I would never get over that and would not now be willing to try to learn and dialogue with pit bull owners.

    Can you at least acknowledge that there are some in this community who have legitimate reason to be raw emotionally about this subject? I can acknowledge that there are some pit bull owners who are part of this community who are responsible and conscientious. And I would encourage you to consider that there is a problem with pit bulls. Even if it is not entirely warranted or justified, there is the perception that pit bulls are a problem. So that means that being an advocate for pit bulls requires dealing with the perceptions because they are not going away. And if there is some truth behind the perceptions, being an advocate for pit bulls means dealing with it. There are disreputable breeders and irresponsible owners. People who want to adopt or rescue pit bulls must be educated about what is required to do so safely. Would you agree with that statement? I also think that more regulation and sunshine about breeding is desperately needed. I don’t know how to accomplish this but it really has to be done. I would be happy to dialogue with you about this and will ask the front pagers if any of them are willing to create a thread to do so. I don’t think that constantly firing barbs and generalizations into every thread is going to do anything but create more discord and make people less likely to want to learn or challenge their opinions and assumptions.

    Thoughts?

  39. 39.

    taylormattd

    August 5, 2013 at 11:27 am

    @Cassidy: fuck off you freak

  40. 40.

    Ruckus

    August 5, 2013 at 11:54 am

    @MomSense:
    A tantrum is just that. It is not about discussion, compromise, ideals, reality.
    If it is your own kid you have a few ways to deal with it. Some work better than others.
    If it is someone else’s kid the only way is to ignore it and hope that it doesn’t escalate.
    But is is nice to try and open discussion. In my mind, in this case fruitless, but that’s just me.

  41. 41.

    Another Holocene Human

    August 5, 2013 at 12:19 pm

    Am I wrong for laughing at this ad? It’s hard for me to get outraged because it just isn’t pinging my gaydar. Straight people used to dress like that–own it.

    There are plenty of straight guys in cosmetology/hairdressing.

    And nobody reached for anybody’s crotch.

    The flap is starting to remind me of the time BDSM activist, Connecticut resident (seriously… is it in the water supply? just asking) and Certified NetKook Laura Goodwin went ballistic on the Internets because she was convinced that Kirk snaps a towel at Spock in the scene where Spock confronts the “lamb Kirk” in the classic STAR TREK episode “Enemy Within”. Also, God made that raincloud look like an elephant and it’s staring at me. Why won’t it stop staring at me?

  42. 42.

    Another Holocene Human

    August 5, 2013 at 12:22 pm

    @smintheus:

    Britain has very different electorates, different institutions, different styles and lengths of campaigns, and British attitudes and sensibilities are pretty different from Americans’. US political consultants and pundits usually end up on some of those rocks when they saunter over to ply their wares.

    For example, in GB they ran an ad about pube-scaping with women of different races that apparently was well received there despite what they implied about the Black lady’s pubes. It quickly went viral on the online outrage circuit in the US for being horrifying, eye-burning, and racist as fuck. Just because we supposedly speak the same language does not mean the culture is one and the same.

  43. 43.

    Another Holocene Human

    August 5, 2013 at 12:24 pm

    This has got to be it: “Mow the Lawn”:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvFSgXpyhoM

    Clearly Britons eat babies and are the real animals.

  44. 44.

    Another Holocene Human

    August 5, 2013 at 12:28 pm

    @Chyron HR: He was some sort of natural cures right wing paranoid who was glugging collodial silver which can cause a condition called argyria which makes your skin appear blue or corpse-like.

    http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/PhonyAds/silverad.html

    The colloidial silver sellers of course claim that it’s “impurities” that cause this condition, but it is, of course, elemental silver. It once had a legitimate use as an anti-biotic but we have much better ones now. (Mercury used to be used as medicine too.)

    There’s quite an overlap between nutty health ideas and right wing paranoid politics.

    Anyway, if this is the blue guy I’m thinking of he tried to shoop his portraits to look oranger and accused the media of faking his gray-skinned images.

    It’s kind of astounding that anyone would do that to themselves.

  45. 45.

    Another Holocene Human

    August 5, 2013 at 12:30 pm

    @dmsilev: which was supposed to cure something or another

    As anyone should have learned by now, Natural Cures “THEY” Don’t Want You To Know About do, in fact, cure everything, including mortality itself.

  46. 46.

    Another Holocene Human

    August 5, 2013 at 12:31 pm

    @Patricia Kayden: Would have loved to have watched those debates and to have learned exactly what the blue-skinned gentleman was advocating for.

    I’ll put $5 on gold-buggery.

  47. 47.

    Sister Rail Gun of Warm Humanitarianism

    August 5, 2013 at 12:43 pm

    @Another Holocene Human:

    There are plenty of straight guys in cosmetology/hairdressing.

    There are now, because the licensing and education has merged. The ad used in the ad (whoa, recursive) is from the early days of that merging, when most people considered it OK to spend a lot of time at the barber shop talking sports, but you’d better not be spending that time actually getting worked on. Getting a perm? (Which the men in the ad clearly had done.) Talk about unmanly!

    Only male cosmetologist I saw in the 1970s was both flamboyant and limp-wristed. A walking, talking stereotype.

  48. 48.

    Cassidy

    August 5, 2013 at 12:49 pm

    @MomSense: I am completely sympathetic and have said as much. You will never convince me that the eradication of a breed is necessary or reasonable because people are assholes. But that’s not the major issue, at least not anymore. It’s the hypocrisy and arrogant laziness that permeates this place. It’s the absentee catlady and his two sycophantic fper’s. And no, I’m not going anywhere.

    @taylormattd: Why so angry? I said nothing that wasn’t true.

  49. 49.

    opiejeanne

    August 5, 2013 at 1:53 pm

    @Another Holocene Human: We had a mailman who was using that stuff and recommended it to me for everything from hay fever to arthritis. He called it Sea Silver. The blueing effect was less obvious on him because he was an African American but there was a grayish hue if you looked carefully.

  50. 50.

    taylormattd

    August 5, 2013 at 2:08 pm

    @Cassidy: You’re acting like a psychopath with a pitbull fetish/obsession. Fuck off.

  51. 51.

    MomSense

    August 5, 2013 at 2:18 pm

    @Cassidy:

    You will never convince me that the eradication of a breed is necessary or reasonable because people are assholes.

    I certainly did not make that case. I do think that disreputable breeders are doing harm to the breed but I never called for eradication.

    It’s the hypocrisy and arrogant laziness that permeates this place.

    So why would you copy that model if you object to it so? Repeating the same formula of comment over and over again on every thread is sort of a lazy way to deal with your concern, no?

    And no, I’m not going anywhere.

    I never suggested you go anywhere so I don’t know why you would say this. I have always appreciated your perspective on things and I was hoping we could find a more constructive way to talk about this. I’m also hoping that I can challenge my own assumptions about this issue because I do realize how personal experience is coloring my perceptions.

  52. 52.

    Donut

    August 5, 2013 at 3:12 pm

    @Cassidy:

    What do you do for a living? You should totally write T-shirt catchphrases! Your stuff is FUCKING GENIUS, man.

    http://www.zazzle.com/its_repetitive_and_redundant_shirts-235706707095897518

  53. 53.

    ricky

    August 5, 2013 at 3:45 pm

    Did they run any ads showing Baucus shearing sheep?

    That’s how real men do buisness in Montana.

  54. 54.

    JGabriel

    August 5, 2013 at 6:26 pm

    Business Week:

    To protect Baucus, Messina had him refuse to participate in any debate that didn’t also include a fringe third-party candidate who’d inadvertently dyed his skin blue with homemade antibiotics—a guaranteed distraction.

    By the way, that’s not an exaggeration. Meet Stan Jones:

    Stan Jones (born January 13, 1943) is a Libertarian Party politician who has twice run unsuccessfully for the United States Senate in 2002 and 2006… In 2002 the winner was Democrat Max Baucus.

    […]

    Jones developed argyria, which permanently turned his skin a blue-grey color, by consuming home-made colloidal silver, which he made due to fears the Year 2000 problem would make antibiotics unavailable. The peculiar coloration of his skin featured prominently in media coverage of his unsuccessful campaign, though Jones allegedly believes that the most prominent photo was “doctored.”

    Jones continues to promote the use of colloidal silver as a home remedy.

    Libertarians. Gotta love’em — at least for the entertaining freak show aspect, if nothing else.

  55. 55.

    b-psycho

    August 5, 2013 at 8:17 pm

    @JGabriel: from your link:

    His stances on policy issues tend to be socially conservative; among other issues, he supports the death penalty, opposes same-sex marriage, and has called abortion a “crime against humanity.”

    What the fuck, was there even an LP primary there that year?!?

  56. 56.

    Joseph Nobles

    August 5, 2013 at 9:08 pm

    Yes, it’s homophobic. By the standards of the time, it was completely playing on gay stereotypes. But the point is made even for 21st Century sensibilities when the last shot slows down so the ad ends on a frozen shot of Taylor seeming to reach down into the crotch of the seated man. Shame on Max Baucus for running this ad.

  57. 57.

    Bob h

    August 6, 2013 at 6:23 am

    Romney’s campaign started to go wobbly in the UK.

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. Midday open thread | Ediary Blog says:
    August 5, 2013 at 3:43 pm

    […] Mistermix pretty much nails it: […]

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • oatler on Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV. Tapes. Espionage. Indictments. Convictions. Prison. (Jun 1, 2023 @ 3:30pm)
  • JCJ on Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV. Tapes. Espionage. Indictments. Convictions. Prison. (Jun 1, 2023 @ 3:29pm)
  • A woman from anywhere (formerly Mohagan) on Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV. Tapes. Espionage. Indictments. Convictions. Prison. (Jun 1, 2023 @ 3:22pm)
  • Captain C on Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV. Tapes. Espionage. Indictments. Convictions. Prison. (Jun 1, 2023 @ 3:21pm)
  • Matt McIrvin on Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV. Tapes. Espionage. Indictments. Convictions. Prison. (Jun 1, 2023 @ 3:21pm)

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Seattle Meetup on Sat 5/13 at 5pm!

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!