• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

If you still can’t see these things even now, maybe politics isn’t your forte and you should stop writing about it.

When do we start airlifting the women and children out of Texas?

Conservatism: there are people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

Never forget that he train is barreling down on Trump, even as he dances on the tracks.

Sadly, media malpractice has become standard practice.

Yeah, with this crowd one never knows.

Reality always lies in wait for … Democrats.

Historically it was a little unusual for the president to be an incoherent babbling moron.

JFC, are there no editors left at that goddamn rag?

with the Kraken taking a plea, the Cheese stands alone.

I didn’t have alien invasion on my 2023 BINGO card.

This country desperately needs a functioning Fourth Estate.

Let there be snark.

Republicans can’t even be trusted with their own money.

Consistently wrong since 2002

This isn’t Democrats spending madly. This is government catching up.

Do not shrug your shoulders and accept the normalization of untruths.

fuckem (in honor of the late great efgoldman)

Every one of the “Roberts Six” lied to get on the court.

Somebody needs to explain to DeSantis that nobody needs to do anything to make him look bad.

“Can i answer the question? No you can not!”

Teach a man to fish, and he’ll sit in a boat all day drinking beer.

Technically true, but collectively nonsense

Republicans are the party of chaos and catastrophe.

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / These were a few of my favorite things

These were a few of my favorite things

by David Anderson|  December 31, 20159:29 am| 12 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance, Blogospheric Navel-Gazing

FacebookTweetEmail

Posts I liked this year:

Pareto proportions in healthcare

A small minority of people drive the vast majority of costs and utilizations. Conversely, most people are minimal users of healthcare services in any given year. This means there are two very distinct strategies that should promote good outcomes.

Reference Pricing tweak for Medicaid

Under my plan, the Medicaid beneficiary would receive a bonus check for a good choice. The check would be a portion of the difference between the bundled reference price and the regional average price

Distributional Impacts of different cost share methods

Deductible plans favor the sickest people as the low utilizers pay for almost all of their care via deductible cash. That means a comparatively high proportion of the pool’s individual responsibility amount is borne by healthy people.

Medicare 200: Medicare E

the desire to use Medicare as the basic structure of a national single payer system as it is a pre-exisiting program whose skeleton is strong enough to build on. However that skeleton has some odd deformities to it, and a lot of trade-offs have been built into Medicare that would need to be re-examined if we were to massively expand Medicare’s scope…. as Medicare E is not a matter of simply printing up new ID cards and mailing them to everyone in the country with a start date three months from the mail date

Why not charge more?

If the Finance and Accounting folks want Mayhew Insurance to increase profit margins by $5 PMPM (which is a massive increase for an increasingly low margin business), premium price increases are a low priority solution because they have significant costs. Instead we’ll see if we can craft a special narrow network which will be very attractive to people with very low utilization but we can charge a couple of extra bucks PMPM while still holding our relative Silver position, we’ll see if we can reduce mail expenses again by a dime PMPM, we’ll see if switching our preferred Hep-C cure to Harvoni instead of Solvadi reduces costs by a quarter PMPM, we’ll see if we really need a VP for Employee Morale (hookers and blow section),

Cash flow of rejecting free money

If we assume that the net federal spend per person who is Medicaid eligible is roughly the same plus or minus a reasonable amount, the net economic loss to a rejection state is “only” the amount of Medicaid spending that is available to cover people who make under 100% FPL as well as those people over 100% FPL but under 138% who would have signed up for Medicaid but did not sign up nor continue to pay their premiums for an Exchange policy.

That number is significantly smaller than Brad Delong’s .7% GDP, probably closer to 0.5% GDP.

Building networks

A wonky post on how provider networks are built

Competition, how does it work again

a symptom of the extremely dysfunctional nature of the individual insurance market before PPACA. It was a vampire that drank blood in quarts and very rarely paid benefits as it specialized in very high deductible policies with significant coverage limitations and short term contracts. The old business model was based on churn, it was based on cherry picking, and it was based on very low medical expense ratios

Lower costs but at what price

A summary of an NBER paper examining care costs after a switch to an HDHP. There were no big explosions of costs three years out. This is making rethink HDHP to some degree.

Wyden Waiver, New CSR Attachment Points

Currently, CSR is only attached to Silver plans. What if states decided to change their subsidy attachment point as part of the Wyden Waiver?

If a state decided to look at the total cost of providing the second lowest Silver in determining subsidy levels instead of just looking at the second lowest premium for Silver, average actuarial value would increase as choice space increases. The change in subsidy formula would be the sum of premium plus CSR subsidy cost minus the individual contribution = subsidy.

Healthcare 2.0 Breaking trusts and building markets

On the health insurance side, margins are already fairly low, and there is some fat left to cut, but not much. On the provider side of the equation, there is plenty of fat left to cut on the basis of international comparisons. The major areas where the Democratic Party can get a lot of money out of the US healthcare system is on high end provider payments, drug costs and hospital payments while also expanding the lower levels of basic but very valuable care. Right now the US health system has numerous guilds and other anti-competetive practices in place which protect small, concentrated and powerful groups’ incomes while screwing the broader society by ringing up much higher healthcare costs without delivering amazing value in return.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Thursday Morning Open Thread: CLAANNNNNNG
Next Post: This Column Nails It »

Reader Interactions

12Comments

  1. 1.

    Yutsano

    December 31, 2015 at 9:45 am

    明けましておめでとうございます!Since it is the new year in Japan!

  2. 2.

    Yutsano

    December 31, 2015 at 9:52 am

    Huh. My post went down the rabbit hole. Nice to know FYWP still acts the same!

  3. 3.

    Chyron HR

    December 31, 2015 at 9:59 am

    Richard, question. If someone’s health insurance coverage changes on January 1, when exactly do they stop being covered under the old plan and start being covered under the new plan. Midnight? If so, midnight where?

  4. 4.

    Richard Mayhew

    December 31, 2015 at 10:04 am

    @Chyron HR: Good question

    In 98% of cases it is local midnight of 12/31 going into 1/1

    inpatient admissions from the ER are funky, but I don’t know the exact details.

  5. 5.

    wvng

    December 31, 2015 at 10:07 am

    My wife and I, fortunately, fall into the category (so far) of “minimal users of healthcare services in any given year.” So we can get Bronze plans through the exchange and be very happy with the result – paying very little in premiums and practically nothing in health care expenses because we don’t have any. So the higher deductibles do not matter to us; we are well covered for major expenses should they happen and that is what we need.

    But I see the people who have the combination of permanent health problems/expenses and fairly low income as having a huge financial problem, no matter what coverage they get through an exchange. I don’t know how they absorb the costs, year after year. And I don’t know how the system can be designed help them.

  6. 6.

    dr. bloor

    December 31, 2015 at 10:12 am

    Posts I liked this year

    If the FPers ever adopt avatars around here, yours must be Louis Tully from Ghostbusters.

    Happy New Year.

  7. 7.

    japa21

    December 31, 2015 at 10:20 am

    @Richard Mayhew: That generally depends on what the contract between the hospital and insurance company states. But generally, a single episode of treatment (ER to inpatient to discharge) would be covered by the policy in effect at the time of onset of treatment. If admission took place after midnight, however, the first policy might well cover the ER services and the new policy pick up the inpatient.

    The real issue becomes if the hospital was in-network with the first insurance but out of network with the new insurance.

  8. 8.

    Rashi

    December 31, 2015 at 11:12 am

    You’re liking your own posts? You’re like the Kanye West of healthcare.

  9. 9.

    Richard Mayhew

    December 31, 2015 at 11:35 am

    @Rashi: I wrote 200+ things on healthcare this year. Some were fluff, some were mistakes, some were timely but ephemeral, and some are sticking with me and made me change how I think…

  10. 10.

    Rashi

    December 31, 2015 at 11:56 am

    @Richard Mayhew: Then onward ho!

  11. 11.

    David Koch

    December 31, 2015 at 11:57 am

    @Richard Mayhew: You column was one of my favorite things. Also your contributions to this year’s World Cup threads.

  12. 12.

    amygdala

    December 31, 2015 at 1:54 pm

    Hi Richard:

    Long-time lurker decloaking to thank you for your posts. I’m a doctor who retired earlier this year after a couple of decades working in a public safety net hospital. The upside of such places is being able to help people in particular need and relative protection from some of the time-consuming hassles of modern medical practice. Downsides: front-row view of what pre-existing condition clauses did (past tense!) to people and the constant reminder that society’s inequities play out daily in health care, the very place where they should go away.

    A lot of doctoring is applying and communicating a somewhat arcane information to people who have other and better things to do with their time. I’m grateful that you do this too, and so well, with your experience and knowledge from the payer perspective. Your posts and Twitter feed have taught me a lot, and I am grateful.

    The relationship, as you no doubt know, between clinicians and third-party payers can be pretty hostile. It has been gratifying seeing someone on the “other” side helping commenters facing tough coverage decisions, devoting real effort to educating us all, and pondering population-level solutions. Outside of public health pros, doctors tend to think about the patient (singular) in the office exam room or hospital bed or on the ED gurney. That’s important, and how we are educated and trained, but needs to be balanced with the high-flyover view so that good, timely care is available for everyone who wishes to avail themselves of it.

    Me, I’d like a hybrid of the Canadian and French systems, but when HillaryCare died in the early 90s, I realized I’d never see either in my professional or biological lifetimes. The ACA isn’t perfect, but in the current political environment, was the best stably achievable option. I still worry that Republicans will manage to gut it irretrievably, but hope it can be tweaked and improved to adapt to local needs. It’s worth remembering that HealthCanada has its roots in provincial-level care.

    Again, thank you. Happy New Year to you and the Balloon Juice community.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Baud on Arizona In The Crosshairs (Apr 17, 2024 @ 2:20pm)
  • marcopolo on Arizona In The Crosshairs (Apr 17, 2024 @ 2:18pm)
  • Sister Golden Bear on Arizona In The Crosshairs (Apr 17, 2024 @ 2:17pm)
  • thruppence on Arizona In The Crosshairs (Apr 17, 2024 @ 2:17pm)
  • louc on Arizona In The Crosshairs (Apr 17, 2024 @ 2:16pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning
Proposed BJ meetups list from frosty

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Political Action 2024

Postcard Writing Information

Balloon Juice for Four Directions AZ

Donate

Balloon Juice for Four Directions NV

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!