Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

No offense, but this thread hasn’t been about you for quite a while.

They don’t have outfits that big. nor codpieces that small.

if you can’t see it, then you are useless in the fight to stop it.

We are aware of all internet traditions.

We know you aren’t a Democrat but since you seem confused let me help you.

They are not red states to be hated; they are voter suppression states to be fixed.

the 10% who apparently lack object permanence

Roe is not about choice. It is about freedom.

I’ve spoken to my cat about this, but it doesn’t seem to do any good.

When I was faster i was always behind.

Republicans: The threats are dire, but my tickets are non-refundable!

Museums are not America’s attic for its racist shit.

I might just take the rest of the day off and do even more nothing than usual.

There is no compromise when it comes to body autonomy. You either have it or you do not.

And now I have baud making fun of me. this day can’t get worse.

You know it’s bad when the Project 2025 people have to create training videos on “How To Be Normal”.

Everything is totally normal and fine!!!

You come for women, you’re gonna get your ass kicked.

I would gladly pay you tuesday for a hamburger today.

A norm that restrains only one side really is not a norm – it is a trap.

Only Democrats have agency, apparently.

Let’s bury these fuckers at the polls 2 years from now.

When I decide to be condescending, you won’t have to dream up a fantasy about it.

Never entrust democracy to any process that requires republicans to act in good faith.

You are here: Home / Archives for Open Threads

Sunday Evening Open Thread: Veepstakes – Josh Shapiro

by | 352 Comments

This post is in: , , ,


 
I was gonna post more about potential VP picks this week, but… it’s been kinda busy!

Governor Shapiro’s been all over social media this weekend, which may or may not be a leading indicator.


 
At the moment, he certainly seems to be the TV Pundits’ Pick, for better or worse:

show full post on front page

Sunday Evening Open Thread: Veepstakes – Josh ShapiroPost + Comments (352)

Interesting Article: Identity Groups for Kamala Harris

by | 238 Comments

This post is in: , , ,

I have thought a little bit about this, that it’s unusual for the organizing calls to be seprate for various identity groups. In fact, I have been a little bit surprised not to see some backlash from the other side about this.

So I was happy to stumble on this article this morning while trying to figure out which was the correct day / date for the Native Men for Harris call.

Identity Groups Are Mobilizing for Kamala Harris. That Shows Progress

On July 21, President Joe Biden ended his bid for re-election and endorsed Kamala Harris as the Democratic nominee for President. That night, 44,000 Black women congregated via Zoom and raised more than $1M for the Harris campaign. The next day, Black men gathered online with similar results. These efforts inspired white women to come together in bold support of the Harris campaign. Reports suggest that white women’s mobilization resulted in the largest Zoom call in history, and they raised more than $8.5 million in less than 24 hours. This is only the tip of the iceberg, though. Gatherings are happening for Black queer men, South Asian women, Latinas, Native women, and white men.

This enthusiasm is significant as Harris heads into the final months of the campaign, but given that American culture discourages this kind of “identity politics,” many people will see this list of identity-specific calls and think, “If you want to support Harris, do it, but why all this separation?” Why gather in specific groups?

These affinity gatherings might feel odd because of a very American idea that even those joining these calls typically find persuasive. It’s therefore worth understanding the sentiment and why flouting it matters.

Many Americans have been taught that it is generally bad and probably insulting to mention categories of race and sexuality. This is because American culture bombards us with positive portrayals of white people and straight people while insisting that such depictions have nothing to do with demographics; they simply tell the truth. At the same time, we’re bombarded with negative depictions of people of color and of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and trans people while being told that such depictions aren’t related to their race or sexuality; those, too, simply tell the truth. Consider the fact that we feel the need to specify that someone is a Black patriot or a gay hero – as opposed to simply a patriot or hero. In our admirable attempt to be inclusive, we’re also highlighting that people from these groups are not who we typically think of when we hear these terms.

In other words, whiteness is accepted as the norm and as a benign umbrella category, even though it is far from neutral or universal. If we were a more honest nation—to take a seemingly harmless example—our bookstores wouldn’t stop at labeling sections of works by “African American Authors” and “Asian American Authors.” They would also label “White Authors” because neither a white writer nor the work they produce is racially neutral.

Being considered white comes with very particular experiences, like shopping without consistently being followed as if you’re a thief. Because I am never mistaken for white when I enter a store, I am routinely treated less as a shopper and more as a potential criminal. This experience is incredibly common and widespread. Dare I say it approaches being universal for entire populations?

But because their experiences are often negative – and this negativity is silently attached to their identities rather than to others’ prejudice – people of color are encouraged to avoid bringing attention to their specific truths. If they name whiteness, the concern goes, or if they point out how race shapes encounters with other Americans, they risk offending, encountering backlash, and limiting themselves.

This is why seeing Black women, Black men, Black queer men, Latinas, and Desis organizing for Kamala Harris warms my heart. It means the people on these calls have chosen to reject the lie that they must keep their distinct experiences to themselves.

However, it is equally encouraging to see white women and white men organize as white women and white men. Despite all the ways American culture teaches them that whiteness hasn’t determined their life chances, and in stark contrast to the way white women, primarily, congregated in a “secret” Facebook group before the 2016 election, these Harris supporters are insisting upon publicly acknowledging the specificity of experience. Doing so doesn’t automatically erect barriers between them and people of color. Instead, it facilitates an honoring of differences that makes those differences strengths.

By coming together as white people who recognize that the United States has given them very different experiences than it offers Americans of color, they are pinpointing precisely why joining a broad coalition matters. Coalition requires acknowledging that there are very real differences, but that those differences matter less than working together to make gains that benefit people far beyond one’s family and friends. Groups that operate in solidarity with groups that are undeniably different are taking steps that run counter to what American culture encourages and are operating in ways that will ultimately make the United States less hostile for more people.

I hope you’ll read the whole thing at the link up top.

Any thoughts?

Open thread.

 

Interesting Article: Identity Groups for Kamala HarrisPost + Comments (238)

Mississippi Ohio, Goddam!

by | 291 Comments

This post is in: 

<s>Mississippi</s> Ohio, Goddam!
Supporters gathered for a press conference July 1, 2024 as anti-gerrymandering advocates submitted about 731,000 signatures backing a constitutional amendment to create an independent redistricting commission in Ohio. Ohio voters are about to seriously test the adage, “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.”

Cleveland – The Plain Dealer, Letter from the Editor

And the people who are trying, yet again, to do the fooling are the state’s election officials. They successfully used a bait-and-switch tactic to derail bona-fide gerrymandering reform a decade ago. Will the tactics that Gov. Mike DeWine launched this week to repeat the bamboozling work again?

I had hoped Ohio leaders learned a lesson last year when they tried to bamboozle voters into giving up their ability to change the state constitution. The voters body slammed the leaders pushing that false narrative, proving that Ohio is a centrist state with common-sense voters who resent being lied to.

Yet over the past week, Ohio leaders launched a new bamboozling campaign, and it promises to be torrid until Election Day.

With Issue 1 last August, elected leaders intent on amassing power tried to persuade voters to give up their ability to alter the Ohio constitution by increasing from 50 to 60 percent the votes need to adopt changes. People like Secretary of State Frank LaRose looked voters in the eye and told them it would be good for them to give up their power. It was a ridiculous lie, and voters firmly rejected it.

That effort was partly about abortion. Headed to the ballot in November was an amendment to enshrine abortion as a right in the Ohio constitution. Voters approved it in a landslide, but not by 60 percent. If the issue in August had passed, the minority would have dictated rules to the majority.

Issue 1 last August was also about gerrymandering, which is the subject of the new bamboozle. Republicans have used gerrymandering to create absurd super majorities in the Legislature, and they don’t want to lose them. They are desperate to keep gerrymandering.

Our newsroom will have its hands full for the next three months laying out all the ways Ohio leaders lie to voters to get them to vote against their own interests. And make no mistake about it: Gerrymandered super majorities are not in anyone’s best interest. The Ohio Legislature is loaded with fringe thinkers who do not represent us. We are repeatedly embarrassed on a national stage as our lawmakers try to outdo each other with increasingly absurd proposals.

The gerrymandering battle is almost a decade old now. Way back in 2015, citizens disgusted with gerrymandering launched a ballot initiative to end it. When lawmakers realized the initiative would be successful, they pulled their bait and switch. They proposed their own, albeit weaker, reforms, successfully persuading the citizens to drop their ballot initiative. Voters, believing the Legislature was acting in good faith, approved the so-called reforms in 2015 for the Legislature and 2018 for Congress.

The new system created a redistricting commission that included the governor, secretary of state, auditor, Senate president, House speaker and two members of the Legislature in the minority party. Voters set strict rules on how to draw lines.

We all know what happened. DeWine and company, who all swore an oath to the Ohio constitution, failed to do live up to the oath. Over and over, an Ohio Supreme Court with a Republican majority found the commission in violation of the constitution with its maps and ordered members to do their duty.

Over and over they refused.

It was a constitutional crisis so ugly that the chief justice, Maureen O’Connor, took the extraordinary step of writing a concurring opinion calling on voters to change the mapmaking system yet again, to remove elected officials from it. Then, when she was forced to retired by age limits, she made it her mission to fix the system.

She and other volunteers came up with a system that leaves out elected officials, much like the one that has worked to end gerrymandering in Michigan. Then those volunteers collected more than 700,000 signatures to put it on the ballot.

Before I get to the new bamboozling, a note about O’Connor. She is the epitome of what we want in public servants, having devoted her life to us. She served as a Summit County judge, Summit County prosecutor, lieutenant governor, head of Ohio’s Public Safety Department and chief justice. No woman in Ohio history held elective office longer.

Her reputation is unassailable, yet when she sided with the majority of justices in rejecting the unconstitutional work of the redistricting commission, a bunch of her fellow Republicans talked about impeaching her. Not because she broke laws. Not because of transgressions. No, they wanted to trash this storied public servant for ruling based on her conscience.

And now the latest bamboozling.

First, a couple of weeks ago, we learned Republican lawmakers considered putting a competing initiative on the ballot, to confuse voters. They rightly realized that Ohio voters would see through such subterfuge and stood down.

But over the past week, people like DeWine, U.S. Rep. Max Miller and others began their campaign to persuade voters that O’Connor’s initiative is a bad one.

Never mind that DeWine, in failing to adhere to the constitution and do his job on the redistricting commission, long ago surrendered any credibility on this issue. But do recall that he is on the record saying that elected officials should not be part of the mapmaking process.

Today, he’s pushing for a system where citizens propose maps but elected officials make the decisions. No way. No how. Don’t buy it. The elected officials refused to serve us. Now, they just want to maintain power.

Who are you going to believe here? O’Connor, who spent a lifetime serving Ohioans without a hint of scandal and has nothing to gain personally? Or the latest bevy of elected leaders, hell-bent to increase their power, who have done everything possible to convince voters to willingly harm themselves?

This issue cannot get lost in the noise of the presidential election. Ohioans have the chance to take back control of their government from power-mad leaders who corrupted the system. O’Connor’s initiative would end the suffocating reign of megalomaniacs.

As we did last year with Issue 1 in August, we will do everything we can to explain what is at stake here. But last time around, you did the hard work. You saw what was at stake and contacted everyone you knew to make sure they understood.

Start spreading the word.

Again.

I’m at [email protected]

Thanks for reading

I simply don’t understand how Ohio legislators can just say fuck you to their supreme court.  Not to mention saying fuck you to the people who elected them!

Ohio peeps, please fill us in on what’s happening.

Does your state have a motto?  Because I’m nominating Ohio, WTF?

<s>Mississippi</s> Ohio, Goddam!Post + Comments (291)

Worker Power Leadership School – Field Notes Vol. 3

by | 28 Comments

This post is in: , , ,

We have another update from Worker Power, where we recently funded a student so they could attend the Worker Power Leadership School.  It looks like Worker Power will be sharing their weekly newsletter with us over the 4 weeks of Leadership School.  This is the second I have received.

This is a helpful reminder to me that good things are happening, which will not only pay off in the fall but also in the years ahead,

You guys said you are interested in these, so here you go!

Reminder:  One of the students from this year’s school will be leading the team we will funding for 3 weeks in the fall.  We don’t know who our team leader will be in the fall, but won’t it be fun if it turns out to be one of the students that is featured here?

Excerpts from the newletter

Welcome to Field Notes, our newsletter highlighting students and faculty of the second Worker Power Leadership School, a month-long program dedicated to training the next generation of progressive leaders who will run winning campaigns for working people.

In this volume of Field Notes, we have a faculty spotlight on  Shana L. Redmond, whose “Songs and Solidarity” class was a favorite for many Leadership School students, and a student spotlight on Aicha Tahirou, and Ken Hamilton, a program participant coming to us from UAW Region 6, shares some of his experience talking to voters.

show full post on front page

Worker Power Leadership School – Field Notes Vol. 3Post + Comments (28)

Outsourcing!

by | 192 Comments

This post is in: 

It’s sure looking like the Trump takeover of the RNC is going about as well as Trump Steaks and Water: [gift link]

With fewer than 100 days before the election, local GOP officials in battleground states have raised alarms about the scant presence of Trump campaign field staff. For the large armies of paid and volunteer door-knockers and canvassers who typically drive turnout in presidential elections, the campaign is largely relying on outside groups such as America First Works, America PAC and Turning Point Action.

The FEC has allowed Trump’s campaign to coordinate closely with those PACs, but this is the first time that’s happened.  Anyone who’s worked in a campaign wouldn’t like the sound of this:

The Trump campaign’s shrunken in-house operation resulted from its takeover of the Republican National Committee in March, when Trump secured the nomination. The RNC had been planning an extensive field program, according to documents obtained by The Washington Post. Thosenow-discarded plans included 88 staff members and 12 offices, and goals to knock on 3 million doors and make 2.4 million phone calls, in Pennsylvania. In Arizona, the RNC’s plan called for 62 staffers and seven offices, aiming for 558,000 voter contacts.

Also, counting on Elmo is a fool’s game:

The Musk-backed program is in flux, a person familiar with the operation said, after it cut ties with a firm that had been hired to handle much of the operation. It is unclear what the group will do next.

Of course, the Harris campaign is sticking to their original plan of organizing via the campaign.

It’s more than a little ironic that the Trump campaign might fail because they ran the Republican playbook of outsourcing everything.

Outsourcing!Post + Comments (192)

Sunday Morning Open Thread: Tikkun Olam

by | 107 Comments

This post is in: , , ,

Sunday Morning Open Thread: Tikkum Olam

(Mike Luckovich via GoComics.com)

 

Politico doesn’t know whether to be thrilled (horserace!) or appalled (are Dems even *allowed* to be optimistic?). “‘There’s a renewed sense of hope’: Dems crank up campaign as Harris clinches nomination”:

show full post on front page

Sunday Morning Open Thread: Tikkun OlamPost + Comments (107)

Dark & Stormy (Open Thread)

by | 114 Comments

This post is in: ,

We’re having another night like this as Tropical Storm Debby glides north in the Gulf of Mexico:

Post by @bettycrackerfl
View on Threads

We aren’t worried. Should be mostly a rain event for us, and the river is still low enough to have plenty of capacity.

The frogs are singing their little green butts off! The weather is surprisingly pleasant, breezy and mild.

When not ensconced on the porch with an eye on the weather, I’m rewatching “The West Wing,” mostly as background noise that’s entertaining but doesn’t require focus. Despite its famous flaws, it’s a helluva series.

The series is 20 years old, but the political issues explored are in most cases exactly the same, which underscores the Sisyphean nature of the struggle for progress. Good reminder!

Anyhoo, open thread.

Dark & Stormy (Open Thread)Post + Comments (114)