• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

I would gladly pay you tuesday for a hamburger today.

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires.

Innocent people do not delay justice.

Russian mouthpiece, go fuck yourself.

At some point, the ability to learn is a factor of character, not IQ.

If you still can’t see these things even now, maybe politics isn’t your forte and you should stop writing about it.

Putting aside our relentless self-interest because the moral imperative is crystal clear.

Celebrate the fucking wins.

Sitting here in limbo waiting for the dice to roll

“The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits.”

And now I have baud making fun of me. this day can’t get worse.

They were going to turn on one another at some point. It was inevitable.

Let’s delete this post and never speak of this again.

Some judge needs to shut this circus down soon.

I would try pessimism, but it probably wouldn’t work.

I’d hate to be the candidate who lost to this guy.

Come on, media. you have one job. start doing it.

No offense, but this thread hasn’t been about you for quite a while.

Well, whatever it is, it’s better than being a Republican.

Shallow, uninformed, and lacking identity

It’s a good piece. click on over. but then come back!!

The snowflake in chief appeared visibly frustrated when questioned by a reporter about egg prices.

Hell hath no fury like a farmer bankrupted.

Decision time: keep arguing about the last election, or try to win the next one?

Mobile Menu

  • 2026 Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Archives for Politics / Democratic Politics

Democratic Politics

Running In The Red: What’s Next

by TaMara|  March 22, 20264:30 pm| 31 Comments

This post is in: Democratic Politics, Political Action, Politics, Activism, Running in the Red

From TaMara: Now that we put our toe in the water, it’s time to find more candidates. Remember this is an opportunity to reach out to those souls running in deep Red Districts or Red States and learn what their experience has been. Is there a shifting landscape? Are they finding support from unusual people? What made them run?

What this isn’t. We are not endorsing any candidate, we just want to learn about their journey. Of course, if later we find out they are a closet-Nazi-racist-transphobe, we’ll deal with that appropriately. We don’t play here.  FAFO

**Wouldn’t want to besmirch a blog with such a pristine reputation**

You’ll see some cute kittehs in this post. Let me be clear, they are not running for anything except the cabinet of extreme cuteness.  But I thought MazeDancer needed to offer the appropriate fee for being on the front page.

***

Running In the Red: A New Series

 

From MazeDancer:

show full post on front page

Nothing can shift our nation faster, and more permanently, than electing Democrats in Red States.

That’s why, on Wednesday, we announced a new Balloon-Juice series called Running in the Red, Where we will support and follow brave Dems stepping up to run in hostile territory.

Here is the announcement post for those who missed it, or would like a refresher.

In that post, you will meet our first Running in the Red candidate Grace Van Cleave, vying for State Senate in Iowa

Next week, we will hear more from Grace out on the trail. And she will share her thoughts about what’s happening, now, with voters.

But we need more heroes.

Tuxedo cat in an box
Alethia judging you from her box

Bring Us Your Candidates!

This is your chance to turn armchair activism into big results.

Find us candidates.

Any Dem running for any office in a Red State or district qualifies. Even if they are a Blue pin dot district in a sea of red, we want to hear from them.

The series is hosted byTaMara and MazeDancer. We especially welcome way down ballot races where power really abides, School Boards, obscure elected Commission races, Town Councils.

Though, of course, if you have a contact at a marquee contest in a Red State, please bring them onboard.

Black cat sitting on a bookshelf
Kai judging you from above

Show ’em the post on Grace and sell ’em on Balloon-Juice. They say yes, put us in touch. (TaMara can be reached at the BJ link in the sidebar. MazeDancer can be reached at PostCardPatriots at gmail dot com).

We’ll welcome them effusively. And send them a quick written interview to start.

Proof positive you can do this – Mike Masuda will be our next featured candidate. Recruited by commenter WaitingForMountainLife, Mike is running for Congress in CA-5, where he aims to flip the district. The  Masuda campaign just had to see the post on Grace to understand what participation looks like. And they were in!

(And once again, we thank Grace for listening to Aunt MazeDancer – as fully disclosed at launch – and taking a chance with BJ. Lucky us.)

If you know a candidate personally, wonderful, but feel free to cold call. Email, phone, use the contact menu at their website, drop by an event, or their HQ. You’re offering candidates excellent, on-going national exposure. This is a good calling card.

One of the reasons we started Running in the Red was to give everyone at BJ, who would like to be more involved in the overthrow of the Trump regime, a real opportunity to do so.

White and brown cat sitting on a pillow
Tess, who would never judge you

So, bring BJ a lot of candidates, We have infinite pixel space to feature them all.

Remember, this is the year when those plus 10 Trump districts looks winnable. And we want to help and we want to hear from those who are running.

So, welcome to Running in the Red. Where we cheer our Dem heroes on their way to Blue Victory.

***

TaMara again: How about we make this an activism open thread? Let’s talk about what we’re all doing to take action, what we’d like to do if we weren’t so freakin’ tired (oh, sorry that’s probably just me) and what we can do. Maybe what the plans are for No Kings next weekend.

One of my senators is up for re-election and every time I get a donation request, I send him a note telling him what I expect him to do before I’ll donate one penny. Mostly it is resist Trump and GOP at every step.

How about you?

Running In The Red: What’s NextPost + Comments (31)

Open Thread: Schumer vs the ‘Fight Club’ Caucus

by Anne Laurie|  March 21, 20266:18 pm| 128 Comments

This post is in: Democratic Politics, Open Threads

We got a spicy Senate caucus revolt story from the WSJ for some Friday night fun.
Murphy, Warren, Smith all named.

[image or embed]

— George Pearkes (@peark.es) March 20, 2026 at 9:11 PM

Assuming this is true (Dems in disarray!!! is a perennial media honeypot), it would explain why my senior Senator Warren would suddenly announce she’s supporting Graham Platner; Schumer was the one who persuaded Janet Mills to enter the Maine primary. Unpaywalled version of the Wall Street Journal story — “Growing frustration with Chuck Schumer spurs talk of replacing him”:

Sen. Chris Murphy was dining with progressive activists at a French restaurant in Washington’s Georgetown neighborhood when the conversation about how to advance their legislative priorities turned to a thorny question: what to do about Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer.

To the surprise of some attendees, the Connecticut Democrat—a rising star in the party’s left flank—responded that some lawmakers had been doing informal counts to see whether enough votes existed to remove the New York Democrat from his leadership position, according to people familiar with the mid-February dinner. Murphy explained that Schumer had enough backing to remain as leader. But the disclosure stood out nonetheless, because it revealed that frustration inside the Senate had reached a high enough level that some Democrats were actively contemplating how to oust Schumer.

Murphy is among a group of senators and top advisers who have grown increasingly dissatisfied with Schumer’s leadership, according to people familiar with the conversations. That group includes Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, who has been initiating conversations with other senators to gauge frustrations with Schumer, some of the people said. Sen. Tina Smith of Minnesota has also been active in discussions about her frustrations with Schumer, and her advisers have spoken with other Senate staff about different scenarios to challenge Schumer’s leadership, other people said.

In an interview, Murphy said he is frequently asked about Senate leadership, but he doesn’t have a count of who would vote to remove Schumer and doesn’t recall mentioning one. “Could someone infer from that that someone was keeping a count? Maybe, but that’s not what I meant,” Murphy said. “I meant that he has the support of the caucus.” He said he still supports Schumer.

In more than four dozen interviews with Democratic senators, candidates, current and former congressional aides, activists and advisers, many said the concern about Schumer’s leadership was widespread. Meetings between Democratic chiefs of staff on Senate business often veer into airing discontent with Schumer and how to pressure him to step aside as leader after November’s elections, according to attendees and others familiar with the discussions…

show full post on front page

Murphy, Warren and Smith are part of a batch of senators dubbed “Fight Club” who are particularly incensed by Schumer’s approach to the midterms. This group of progressives believes that Schumer favors centrist candidates in some key races and is disregarding the enthusiasm a new crop of outsiders is stoking. The senators maintain a Fight Club chat on Signal where they have discussed how to counter Schumer’s preferred candidates, according to people familiar with the conversations. The existence of the group was reported earlier by the New York Times…

In an interview Thursday in his office, Schumer said that all congressional leaders draw criticism. “That goes with the territory—it’s true for anyone who’s a leader.” He said his “support in the caucus is deep and strong, because people feel I’ve done a very good job” of setting up Democrats to win back the Senate in November. Republicans currently hold a 53-47 majority…

In an interview, Warren said Democratic leadership shouldn’t weigh in on contested primaries but didn’t directly address whether she supported Schumer. Smith’s office declined to make her available for an interview. Murphy said that while he has been critical at times of Schumer’s tactics and wanted Democrats to show more fight, he believes the leader works hard to keep the caucus together.

Schumer’s allies say he retains the backing to keep his job. Hawaii Sen. Brian Schatz said that having “people get grouchy at you” is part of being minority leader. “Chuck’s got broad and deep support,” Schatz said. “Even his detractors would have to admit that we have an extraordinary class of candidates for the Senate, and that that wouldn’t have happened without him.”

Schatz is seen as Schumer’s preferred pick to replace him once he does relinquish his leadership post, people familiar with the matter said. Schatz won’t make any moves until Schumer decides to step aside, according to senators, aides and others familiar with the discussions. Senate leaders are typically chosen in a secret ballot after the November elections…

There’s more discussion at the original post, but most of it is viewable only on BlueSky…

Schatz as the assumed successor to Schumer is interesting. Don't know that it's good, but it's interesting.

— WhimsicalSquirrel (@whimsicalsquirrel.bsky.social) March 20, 2026 at 9:17 PM

I just hope everyone is going to be normal when we have a new minority leader and they realize 47 is still less than 53.

— Chris Peterson (@realchrispeterson.bsky.social) March 21, 2026 at 12:29 AM

Open Thread: Schumer vs the ‘Fight Club’ CaucusPost + Comments (128)

Running In The Red: A New Series

by TaMara|  March 18, 20265:30 pm| 30 Comments

This post is in: Democratic Politics, Political Action, Politics, Proud to Be A Democrat, Running in the Red

Note from TaMara: A month or so ago (time has no meaning any longer) MazeDancer commented about her niece running for office in a very red district. I said, “hey, what I can I do to help? ” A few emails back and forth, and Running in the Red was hatched. MazeDancer has done all the heavy lifting so far. I mostly ran the idea by the Blogfather and did a lot of cheerleading. Rah!

I really love this idea because I don’t think we understand what it takes to run blue in a red district/state. And I believe it’s a perspective that we need. Hear about the candidates’ experiences and what we can all do to help flip those red races.

What you will find below is the start of what I hope is something good. And hopefully also a new front pager.

For it to continue, we will need your input and the willingness of the candidates to participate.

Without further ado….here is the inaugural post.

***

Running In Red with ballot Box on a red white and blue background

show full post on front page

Welcome to Running in the Red.  A New Balloon-Juice Series to Help Save Democracy

Nothing can shift our nation faster, and more permanently, than electing Democrats in Red States. That’s why Balloon-Juice is launching a new series called Running in the Red.  Where we will support brave Dems stepping up in hostile territory.

The series will bring reports, diaries, behind-the-scenes videos, and check-ins from our Running in the Red candidates working to save the nation.

It gets lonely out there surrounded by GOP, especially way down ballot where true change happens. Balloon-Juice can form an on-line army of support. Make phone calls, write PostCards, donate, or just cheer for as many Running in the Red candidates as you choose. If you live close enough, you can even knock on doors.

There is also a new, special Balloon-Juice opportunity for involvement which we will announce at the end of this post.

Our first “Running in the Red” Candidate is Grace Van Cleave. She’s running for State Senate in Iowa’s 17th.

Grace Van Cleave in a red jacket standing in front of a blue background. Text: Grace Van Cleave is fighting to build a new Democratic majority in Iowa

Grace Van Cleave has worked for big, important organizations ranging from EMILY’s list to the DNC.

Her senior campaign jobs have included being Finance Director for Governor Chet Culver in Iowa, and Chief of Staff to Governor Ned Lamont’s campaign in Connecticut

Longtime advocate for equality, Grace ran, four years ago, for Iowa House on a Reproductive Rights platform. And, like Barack Obama before her, lost her first race.

She concentrated on her successful fashion business advising women on how to dress beautifully without spending a fortune. But as the world sank into GOP-ness, she felt the call to public service again.

Iowa Candidate Grace canvassing on a snowy street

In our BJ Interview, Grace was no-nonsense, staunchly focussed on her goal of being a “results-oriented legislator”.

She is a shining example of the nationwide trend for Dems to be all about affordability and improving people’s daily lives.

As she says, “When government works well, it helps families thrive, supports small businesses, and protects democratic institutions.”.

But in Iowa, concern for public welfare has taken a back-seat to performative politics.

The Iowa Legislature “has spent more energy on privatization, restrictions, and tax ideology than on solving real problems for families.”

Grace continues,”Instead of strengthening public schools, expanding health care access, and investing in opportunity, too many policies shift risk onto ordinary people.”

For Grace,  “Public education is the foundation of opportunity.”. Which means keeping “public money for public schools”.  Because “Every child deserves a well-funded school with great teachers and strong programs.”.

It is clear many Iowans are done with legislative neglect of their real interests, as endorsements for Grace have flowed in. Including from Iowa’s Iron Workers Local 67.

You can read 24 rousing endorsements from prominent Iowans, here GraceforIowa.com/Endorsements

Relevant to BJ interests, Grace is a staunch supporter of animal rescue. She and her husband have a 15-year-old rescue dachshund named Molly.

When Molly’s doxie bonded sister, Maggie, passed away, they were worried Molly would be inconsolable,  But Grace reports that, after some mourning, Molly is enjoying her reign as “Senior Dog” and is “still full of determination and curiosity.”

We look forward to hearing from Grace early and often out on the trail.

Grace’s website is GraceforIowa  / You can volunteer here: GraceforIowa/Volunteer   / Donate at ActBlue

All local races are always desperate for every dollar.

Or if you are in driving distance, sign up to knock on doors with Grace any and every weekend.

Candidate Grace with black dog named Grace
While out canvassing, candidate Grace met a very good girl also named Grace.

The Future is Up to You

Who’s next? That is up to you.

Running in the Red will be hosted by TaMara and MazeDancer.

However, the candidates will be coming from you. Among the reasons we wanted to launch Running in the Red was to offer increased opportunity for real involvement to everyone at Balloon-Juice.

This is a sign for you to get involved. Bring us your candidates. And by “bring”, we need you to do more than just type a name in the comments. In fact, please don’t do that.

We need you to become Campaign Contact.  That means you set up a communication channel between Balloon-Juice and your candidate.  You find out if the candidate is interested in being featured. Show them the post on Grace. Tell them they can have one, too.

And, then, after their interview and launch post, we would like them to update with pics and vids from the campaign trail, whenever they please. If they say yes, you set up an email, phone, or text channel where Balloon-Juice can be in contact with your candidate.

And, here’s the active participation part – if the candidate does not reply to Balloon-Juice, you have to run interference.

If you do not understand how often campaigns don’t reply – even when you are offering them national exposure – you have never been in politics.

That’s why candidates who are friends, neighbors, relatives, co-workers, anyone you know personally, are more than welcome.

Grace Van Cleave is MazeDancer’s niece. Which is how we got such a great candidate to agree to launch the series.

(Aunt MazeDancer can be very persuasive. In all fairness, Grace once got Aunt MazeDancer to produce over a dozen portraits for Animal Rescue League of Iowa’s annual Poorly Drawn Pets fundraiser.)

 

Any and all Democratic candidates running for any office in a red district or state is worthy of BJ support. Doesn’t matter if it is a Blue Dot district in a sea of red. Doesn’t matter how teeny or huge the office. Anyone running in a red state deserves our attention.

You do not have to write anything.

TaMara and MazeDancer will handle that. You “just” have to get the candidates to stay in touch.

Note: You do NOT have to seize this opportunity to be involved. You can be an armchair warrior for all our upcoming Running in the Red candidates by supporting and donating at home.

But if you can be a Campaign Contact, we all thank you.

Blue Victory here we come!

(This is not an Open Thread)

Running In The Red: A New SeriesPost + Comments (30)

Stephen Miller is a Villain, Make Him the Poster Child?

by WaterGirl|  March 16, 202610:00 am| 179 Comments

This post is in: Democratic Politics, Open Threads, Politics

Mark Jacob thinks Democrats should make Trump’s Stephen Miller the face of the GOP.  He thinks Democrats should zero in on Stephen Miller as a supervillain.

Stephen Miller is the fevered brain that is pushing a Trump dictatorship.

He’s the head cheerleader for white nationalism, the architect of state terror against immigrants, and a determined enemy of the rule of law, except for the law of the jungle — the law of brute force.

He’s the 21st century American version of a Nazi.

And he has the ear of the convicted felon in the White House, which makes him one of the most dangerous people alive.

I have to say, he certainly looks like the ugliness that is on the inside.

Both the news media and Democrats need to make Miller the ugly poster child for the fascist assault on our country.

It’s in the media’s interest to do so because awareness of Miller’s influence helps the public understand the regime’s frightening goals.

It’s in the Democrats’ interest to do so because Miller is an offputting creep who can be accurately cast as a Republican supervillain during the midterms. He even looks like Dr. Evil. Republican Sen. Thom Tillis compares him to Grima Wormtongue, the sycophantic adviser to the king in “The Lord of the Rings.”

Senator Tillis, a Republican, is saying that Stephen Miller is a big problem for T.

Some journalists realize the destructive influence that Miller wields. Praiseworthy news outlets include the “PBS NewsHour,” NBC News, and The New Republic, whose Greg Sargent wrote an outstanding story last December headlined “Inside Stephen Miller’s Dark Plot to Build a MAGA Terror State.”

But will Democrats make the obnoxious and unlikable Miller a key target in their midterms messaging? Will they run against Miller’s extremism and in solidarity with the vital contributions of immigrants?

One of the most cartoonishly wicked members of the Trump regime, Kristi Noem, got fired last week. Perhaps the harsh spotlight previously trained on her can be shifted to Miller.

Sen. Tillis said Sunday that Miller was a “big problem” for Trump. But he’ll be a problem only if Democrats seize the opportunity to make him a liability for the entire Republican Party in the midterms.

What would “seizing the opportunity to make him a liability for the entire Republican Party  even look like?

 

Stephen Miller is a Villain, Make Him the Poster Child?Post + Comments (179)

Pragmatic Progressive

by WaterGirl|  March 15, 202612:20 pm| 168 Comments

This post is in: Democratic Politics, Justice, Open Threads

I don’t find all that many labels to be useful or helpful.  Even the Boomer, Gen X, Gen Z labels.  For me, they seem to be a way to “other” other people.  Not really helpful, in my opinion.  To me, Left, horseshoe left, etc seem to have lost all meaning for me except for maybe “somebody I don’t like or respect, or someone whose opinions I don’t care for”.

I have always thought of myself as progressive because that seemed more liberal than, well, “liberal”.  I don’t know exactly when being progressive started to mean being for Bernie or socialist or the DSA, but it surely seems to have turned into that.

So I have landed on Pragmatic Progressive for myself.  I think I’m in good company because I think that term describes Barack Obama perfectly.  Did Barack disappoint me on a few things?  Of course.  But I still think he was a great president.

As I started to put this post together, I decided I had better google for the meaning of pragmatic progressive in case I had it wrong.  Up came a conversation on Reddit, and I think the first few comments describe it really well.

That doesn’t mean that we don’t swing big, but we’re almost never going to get everything we want, and I think we have to be practical and take the gains we can get.  And not throw anyone out of the boat who doesn’t exactly agree with us on everything.

Now I want to pivot to a comment that was made on BJ in the past week or so.  I’ll let the writer identify themselves if they wish, and I have redacted the name of the candidate being discussed because who that candidate is matters not at all to this discussion.

Is his vote a play to appease the Republicans in our district or does he really believe this is a good war, or both, I can’t say.

Other than that, [name redacted] is very good on domestic issues and he has a helpful and responsive staff.

I’m going to vote to re-elect him even if this vote repulses me.

The comment above models exactly the attitude I think we need right now.  

This isn’t the time for purity or sharp elbows aimed at people who are mostly on our side.  BIG TENT.  Maybe we all need to write that on the blackboard 100 times.  We have a much better chance of winning in November if more of us can learn to take this sort of approach, myself included.

So what do I like most about this comment?

First line: Is his vote a play to appease the Republicans in our district or does he really believe this is a good war, or both, I can’t say.

I can’t say!

We can never be certain what a particular person’s motivation in a particular situation is, and it’s bullshit to try to pretend that we do.  Really, when someone does that, I pretty much dismiss the rest of what they have to say – because ascribing motivation when you really have no way to know the motivation is simply an indication of bad faith and it makes me question the speaker, not the candidate being spoken about.

Now if you’re talking about the fascists who are still Republicans, I’m all for ascribing all the motivations we want.  Those are not normal people and they have clearly shown bad intent.  Repeatedly.  See Project 2025.

Now, back to people who are on our side.

So I love that first line, which was basically: ” I don’t pretend to know why they did what they did.”

Second line: Other than that, [name redacted] is very good on domestic issues and he has a helpful and responsive staff.

I love that, too!  “Just because they let me down on this one thing doesn’t mean he should be replaced.”

Narrator:  No person or candidate is perfect.

Third line: I’m going to vote to re-elect him even if this vote repulses me.

Clearly that’s a grown-up talking, able to be practical even while feeling a strong emotion.

Now I have absolutely no idea what label that commenter would use for their political stance; in fact, I have no idea if they have a label for themselves at all.  We don’t all need to describe the same behavior with the same label.

But I do believe that as Democrats who want to end the madness of hits administration, this is the definitely the approach we need to aspire to if we want to win in November, and beyond.

Because what we all really want is justice for everyone.  Right?

Pragmatic ProgressivePost + Comments (168)

‘Epstein Class’ – It’s No Accident That We Are Seeing That So Widely

by WaterGirl|  February 14, 202612:21 pm| 167 Comments

This post is in: Breathtaking Corruption, Breathtaking Criminality and Lawlessness, Democratic Politics, Democratic Response to Trump 2.0, Open Threads

'Epstein Class' – It's No Accident That We Are Seeing That Everywhere

I’m not sure if it started last week or the week before that, but that was when I first heard “Epstein class”.

Then suddenly “Epstein class” started appearing nearly  every time a Democrat was talking about anything related to the millionaires / billionaires / money people / the rich tech boys.   And so on.  It’s brilliant.

Someone came up with that and someone realized that it’s the perfect description that even normies could recognize, not to mention a way to keep Epstein in the news.  And the Dems decided to adopt it.  I think there’s no other explanation for its sudden appearance and widespread usage, all at the same time.

I am WaterGirl and I approve that message. :-)

To me, Epstein class brings to mind money + women as things + girls as things to be used and abused + privilege + entitlement + arrogance + heartlessness.

What does it bring to mind for you?

Again, the sheer beauty of it is that the curtain is being pulled aback on the Epstein class, and it’s not a pretty picture.

Somewhat related, I think the Trump women anger me more than the men.  Maybe I expect more of women?  I don’t know.  When are they all going to be dressing in Cruella Deville outfits?  Their faces are halfway there already.  By choice!

‘Epstein Class’ – It’s No Accident That We Are Seeing That So WidelyPost + Comments (167)

Jon Ossoff – Please Take Time to Watch This Fantastic Speech

by WaterGirl|  February 12, 20266:00 pm| 28 Comments

This post is in: 2026 Elections, Democratic Politics, Dems Fighting Back, Elections, Politics

Jon Ossoff is one of the candidates we’ll be supporting this cycle with our fundraising.  This speech is a great example of why.

Months ago, we talked with Jon Ossoff’s campaign about making an arrangement for all of our BJ fundraising to go toward field work and not advertising, consultants, etc.

Not ready to start our fundraising for him just yet, but if some of you guys are wanting to start donating now, I can put up a link to our thermometer so anything you give will go toward field work.  Let me know in the comments?

It will be a tough fight in Georgia this year – even though I can’t think of any senator who is better than he is.  There are a few who are tied for “damn, we are so lucky to have this person in the senate”.

We don’t normally fundraise any more for candidates who are well-funded, but Ossoff is their big Senate target to knock off in 2026, so it seems worth it to me if our funds can go to organizing and boots on the ground.

Feel free to share you thoughts in the comments!

Jon Ossoff – Please Take Time to Watch This Fantastic SpeechPost + Comments (28)

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 16
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - ema - Next Stop: Orchid Avenue 8
Photo by ema (3/31/26)
Donate

Election Resources

Voter Registration Info – Find a State
Check Voter Registration by Address
Election Calendar by State

Targeted Fundraising Info & Links

Recent Comments

  • bjacques on War for Ukraine Day 1,490: It’s Not a Peace Process, It’s a Shakedown (Mar 26, 2026 @ 3:10am)
  • prostratedragon on Wednesday Night Open Thread (Mar 26, 2026 @ 2:36am)
  • wjca on War for Ukraine Day 1,490: It’s Not a Peace Process, It’s a Shakedown (Mar 26, 2026 @ 2:26am)
  • NotMax on Wednesday Night Open Thread (Mar 26, 2026 @ 2:20am)
  • YY_Sima Qian on War for Ukraine Day 1,490: It’s Not a Peace Process, It’s a Shakedown (Mar 26, 2026 @ 2:08am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
On Artificial Intelligence (7-part series)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Outsmarting Apple iOS 26

Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Order Calendar A
Order Calendar B

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix
Rose Judson (podcast)

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Privacy Manager

Copyright © 2026 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc