• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires

Anyone who bans teaching American history has no right to shape America’s future.

Not so fun when the rabbit gets the gun, is it?

Not all heroes wear capes.

It may be funny to you motherfucker, but it’s not funny to me.

“Squeaker” McCarthy

And now I have baud making fun of me. this day can’t get worse.

Reality always lies in wait for … Democrats.

Optimism opens the door to great things.

Everybody saw this coming.

Damn right I heard that as a threat.

Make the republican party small enough to drown in a bathtub.

The arc of history bends toward the same old fuckery.

My years-long effort to drive family and friends away has really paid off this year.

Let me eat cake. The rest of you could stand to lose some weight, frankly.

I see no possible difficulties whatsoever with this fool-proof plan.

So it was an October Surprise A Day, like an Advent calendar but for crime.

Bark louder, little dog.

Yeah, with this crowd one never knows.

New McCarthy, same old McCarthyism.

The GOP is a fucking disgrace.

Accused of treason; bitches about the ratings. I am in awe.

They fucked up the fucking up of the fuckup!

Incompetence, fear, or corruption? why not all three?

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Economics / C.R.E.A.M. / You Better Come Heavy

You Better Come Heavy

by $8 blue check mistermix|  June 23, 20108:16 am| 15 Comments

This post is in: C.R.E.A.M.

FacebookTweetEmail

Blue Dog Tim Matheson, who won the primary in in UT-2 last night, wasn’t lacking for money:

By contrast, Matheson spent $757,000 as of June 2, and he still had money left to spend. About $959,000 of his contributions had come from various PACs, and $161,000 came from individual donors.

His opponent, Claudia Wright, spent about $20K after convincing 45% of the delegates at the Utah Democratic Convention to back her, which forced the primary.

I don’t know if this R+15 district could support a more progressive candidate, but this race illustrates a key point about the ugly mix that characterizes the typical Blue Dog. They’re conservative because of the ideology of their constituents, and they’re corporatist because of the demands of fundraising. If you need a couple million dollars every two years, you’re going to be in the pockets a more than one industry.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Don’t buck Beck
Next Post: More On McChrystal »

Reader Interactions

15Comments

  1. 1.

    someguy

    June 23, 2010 at 8:24 am

    Yeah, but at least it’s not a lifetime appointment, like crooked judiciary members who are owned by Big Oil.

  2. 2.

    Capn America

    June 23, 2010 at 8:30 am

    How much of that money was from out-of-district?

  3. 3.

    Kryptik

    June 23, 2010 at 8:47 am

    In other words, Blue Dogs are forever and nary will a Dem who won’t waffle right more often than not upend them or their power.

    Not the exact impression of your post, but still the one I come away with when I see the sad facts of ‘Blue Dog > ‘Rea’ Dem’. Er….not that ‘Real’ Dems aren’t pocketed by the corps. They just don’t give enough lip service to big business to win too often, electorally or legislatively.

  4. 4.

    Jared

    June 23, 2010 at 9:30 am

    Tim Matheson?

    I liked him on “The West Wing.”

    :-)

  5. 5.

    low-tech cyclist

    June 23, 2010 at 9:49 am

    That’s the thing that drives me nuts about MSM characterization of the Blue Dogs as ‘centrist’ Dems representing swing or R-leaning districts.

    As a small-d democrat, I can deal with it (with a little bit of wincing, but I can deal with it) if they take the conservative side of certain issues in deference to the wishes of their constituents. If they earn a 100% rating from the NRA, so be it. If they’re way too pro-life for my tastes, yeah, I’ll grit my teeth, but ultimately the only thing to do is win this one in the court of public opinion.

    The problem isn’t all that. The problem is that these guys are corporate tools, but the MSM characterizes that as ‘centrist.’

    A Dem who’s both of these things – conservative on social issues, AND a corporate tool to boot – is, for all practical purposes, a Republican. We don’t really gain much advantage in voting patterns from such people, and our brand gets totally muddled.

    The best outcome in the House this fall is that 15-20 Blue Dogs and DLCers lose their seats, but everybody from the Democratic wing of the Democratic Party gets re-elected.

  6. 6.

    Brien Jackson

    June 23, 2010 at 9:55 am

    If only Obama would order those corporate interests to not donate any money to Blue Dogs, then we’d get them!

  7. 7.

    KCinDC

    June 23, 2010 at 10:35 am

    You don’t know whether a district in Utah that’s R+15 could elect a lesbian ex-Mormon? I have a pretty good idea what the answer is. I’m not fond of Blue Dogs either, but when they’re necessary to prevent a Republican takeover of the House (which has a good chance of happening), I’d rather have one than the Republican alternative.

  8. 8.

    Allison W.

    June 23, 2010 at 10:42 am

    This is a great argument for why progressives need to focus on the voters. Going door to door, going to local organizations, their churches, their events and working long and hard to convince them that republican policies are not working for them.

  9. 9.

    Bill Rutherford, Princeton Admissions

    June 23, 2010 at 10:47 am

    Eric Stratton, rush chairman. Damn glad to meet you.

  10. 10.

    BruinKid

    June 23, 2010 at 11:37 am

    I believe the Congressman’s name is Jim, not Tim.

  11. 11.

    Brett

    June 23, 2010 at 12:04 pm

    I don’t know if this R+15 district could support a more progressive candidate,

    It can’t, and I say this as someone who both lives in that district and participated in the Utah Democratic Convention. After the 2000 Census, the Republican-dominated State Legislature tried to gerrymander Jim Matheson out of existence by splitting up Salt Lake County (which houses most of Utah’s Democrats, and particularly most of its liberal Democrats) and attaching half of the fucking state (look at the map) to the resulting 2nd District.

    Matheson nearly lost in the next election, and the only reason he’s been able to hang on to the seat up to this point was because he has gone and pandered extensively to all those conservative southern Utah folk. If Claudia Wright had won her quixotic challenge, Utah Democrats would have lost our only representation at the national level, likely for good unless Utah gets the 4th seat.

    Now, I know some of you are probably thinking, “Well, he’s a conservative blue dog who votes against most Democratic stuff anyways, so what’s the loss?” The reason why having Matheson is good is because, while he may be conservative, ultimately he does have to answer to the state party and convention. Get a Republican in there, and the combination of fund-raising, Republican state dominance, and ultra-conservative Republican primaries, and that Republican Representative will be pushed so far to the right that he’ll make Matheson look like Dennis Kucinich.

  12. 12.

    Calouste

    June 23, 2010 at 12:20 pm

    they’re corporatist because of the demands of fundraising. If you need a couple million dollars every two years, you’re going to be in the pockets a more than one industry.

    American “democracy” summarized.

  13. 13.

    Athenae

    June 23, 2010 at 12:21 pm

    OTTER?

    Sweet.

    A.

  14. 14.

    mattH

    June 23, 2010 at 12:27 pm

    Brett nails it ( I’m betting mistermix is being a bit sarcastic here) but at the same time it was a tiny bit nice to see his feet held to the fire over some of those nasty votes he did make. I was going to call his office during the Health Care Debacle and offer 50 hours of my time to him if he’d just vote for the bill to get it through, but not being a constituent I figured he’d just ignore me. And don’t doubt that the majority of his “blue dog” votes are more about fund raising than they are constituent pleasing votes.

    He’s being as liberal as his gerrymandered district allows. The state legislature not only divided up SLC to make his district more conservative, they just barely cut out Park City from it, and added in Sandy, which would have at least given him a chance to not have to swing so far right.

    And yes, it’s Jim, not Tim.

  15. 15.

    CalD

    June 23, 2010 at 6:18 pm

    __

    “I don’t know if this R+15 district could support a more progressive candidate…”

    Let’s put it this way: No.
    __

    “They’re conservative because of the ideology of their constituents, and they’re corporatist because of the demands of fundraising. If you need a couple million dollars every two years, you’re going to be in the pockets a more than one industry.”

    Correct. Or at least they need to refrain from being overtly antagonistic toward industry. And this is about more than just money.

    For one thing, there’s an ideological component to where a person thinks the line should be drawn in regulating business. So it plays into voter’s perceptions of a candidate’s relative liberalness or conservativeness.

    For another, it appears that some of those dumb hillbillies out in the red states have somehow gotten it in their heads that their elected representatives should be looking out for the interests of the folks back home, and the largest industries in a state often turn out to be the largest employers. (Funny how that works.) When something happens in Washington that affects the bottom line of a home state industry, voters can lose jobs and states can lose tax revenues. Not to say you shouldn’t do it anyway if it’s in the best interests of the many, just that most things in life is come with trade-offs, and that’s an easy thing to forget sometimes.

    Another thing that’s easy to forget is that the vast majority of the time, it’s not like politicians are using the contributions they collect from any source to enrich themselves. All they can legally use that money for is to try and get elected, and the fact that it takes so damned much money to do that is our fault, not theirs. If voters could be bothered to spend a little more time informing themselves about the working of our government and the actions of their representatives, which are a matter of public record, elections would cost a lot less advertising wouldn’t play much of a role in forming our opinions. But we don’t, so it does.

    The good new is that (a) half a loaf — or maybe 55% of a loaf in Matheson’s case, which admittedly is pretty dismal even for a Blue Dog — is still better than none and (b) having Matheson in that seat instead of a Republican helps keep Democrats in control of the congressional agenda. And if that was the only thing Blue Dogs were ever good for, it would still be pretty huge. That’s why Nancy Pelosi calls them “the Majority Makers.”

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Subsole on The Funniest Thing About All of This (Mar 31, 2023 @ 2:29am)
  • Subsole on The Funniest Thing About All of This (Mar 31, 2023 @ 2:29am)
  • Subsole on The Funniest Thing About All of This (Mar 31, 2023 @ 2:28am)
  • Geminid on War for Ukraine Day 400: Russia Takes a Hostage (Mar 31, 2023 @ 2:27am)
  • frosty on The Funniest Thing About All of This (Mar 31, 2023 @ 2:19am)

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Seattle Meetup coming up on April 4!

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!