• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

To the privileged, equality seems like oppression.

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

We are aware of all internet traditions.

A norm that restrains only one side really is not a norm – it is a trap.

Take hopelessness and turn it into resilience.

It is not hopeless, and we are not helpless.

Republicans want to make it harder to vote and easier for them to cheat.

“Perhaps I should have considered other options.” (head-desk)

“Loving your country does not mean lying about its history.”

Never give a known liar the benefit of the doubt.

When someone says they “love freedom”, rest assured they don’t mean yours.

If you can’t control your emotions, someone else will.

When they say they are pro-life, they do not mean yours.

He really is that stupid.

Republicans are radicals, not conservatives.

You can’t attract Republican voters. You can only out organize them.

Our job is not to persuade republicans but to defeat them.

Why is it so hard for them to condemn hate?

Sitting here in limbo waiting for the dice to roll

Tick tock motherfuckers!

So it was an October Surprise A Day, like an Advent calendar but for crime.

“A king is only a king if we bow down.” – Rev. William Barber

Today in our ongoing national embarrassment…

Fucking consultants! (of the political variety)

Mobile Menu

  • 4 Directions VA 2025 Raffle
  • 2025 Activism
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Impeachment Inquiry / Testifying Today – Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman

Testifying Today – Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman

by Cheryl Rofer|  October 29, 20199:49 am| 241 Comments

This post is in: Impeachment Inquiry, Open Threads

FacebookTweetEmail

The House committees hearing testimony on the American President’s improper demands on the Ukrainian President will hear from a member of the National Security Council specializing in relations with Ukraine – Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman, United States Army. His opening statement is here.

Vindman was on the now-famous phonecall in which Donald Trump tried to shake down Volodymyr Zelensky by withholding congressionally appropriated funds for Ukraine’s defense against the Russian incursion in the eastern part of his country. No more cries of “hearsay” from the Republicans, if they were honest.

But they are not honest, and desperately trying to smear Vindman, who came to the United States as a child, a refugee from antisemitic discrimination in the Soviet Union. The background is worth knowing.

Just to add a little texture and context to this "questioning of loyalty" of Lt. Col Vindman. From the perspective of a 1970s teenager who marched in the streets carrying signs in support of freedom for Soviet Jews. This was the first political cause of my protest career (1) https://t.co/7rYzpN7hrV

— Mr winner (@Mr_Winner___) October 29, 2019

The American Jewish community took on this cause in the 1970s. Elie Wiesel sounded the alarm, Jewish leaders took up the cause, and Jewish teenagers marched with signs and wore bracelets with the names of "refuseniks." (great book on this: https://t.co/qGObDWWPxr )

— Mr winner (@Mr_Winner___) October 29, 2019

In my adult life, I have met several professionals in the U.S. national security establishment who speak fluent Russian and un-accented English. They came as children, they grew up to serve America. As did Lt. Col. Vindman. They escaped oppression, they savor freedom. (4)

— Mr winner (@Mr_Winner___) October 29, 2019

My heart hurts to see the smears, but it hurts more because so many Americans don't know why these Soviet emigres live and serve among us. They should know, and value, how much America served as a beacon for persecuted Jews in the former Soviet Union. We should all know. (fin.)

— Mr winner (@Mr_Winner___) October 29, 2019

As soon as the statement was released last night, the Fox commentators were proclaiming Vindman a Ukraine-loving spy. A despicable former Republican members of Congress is continuing the cry today. This means, of course, that Ukraine managed to plant a spy at the highest levels of government, and Trump was easily duped. The arguments are nonsensical and hypocritical, but the desperation is palpable. Defenders of Trump have nothing to argue but word salad.

Vindman’s statement doesn’t contain much more than what we’ve heard already, but he was on the call. It is becoming clearer and clearer that Gordon Sondman lied in his testimony, the one Trump defender who might have gotten away with it.

Open thread

 

Photo: Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, arriving Tuesday on Capitol Hill. Credit…Anna Moneymaker/impea

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Totally Baud Open Thread
Next Post: Where to expect enrollment swings on Healthcare.gov »

Reader Interactions

241Comments

  1. 1.

    Lee

    October 29, 2019 at 9:58 am

    Does no one remember Khizr Khan? This is all completely on brand for the GOP and no one should have not seen this coming a mile away.

  2. 2.

    MattF

    October 29, 2019 at 10:01 am

    Republican talking points about Vindman’s supposed dual loyalties have gotten to CNN via Sean Duffy, a new CNN talking head. Ex-congressman Sean Duffy on CNN.

  3. 3.

    Gin & Tonic

    October 29, 2019 at 10:05 am

    While I usually expect the worst from the Fox-Republican axis, I was flabbergasted when I heard of this attempted smear last night. People take enormous risks, give up everything to come to the US, then serve their new country with a patriotism and a distinction that a Laura Ingraham or Sean Duffy (heard him spinning this shit on CNN this morning) couldn’t achieve in a thousand lifetimes.

  4. 4.

    Rommie

    October 29, 2019 at 10:06 am

    Flipping the Table is all they have left, really. They are toast, and they know they are toast. The GOP should be in the pressuring Trump/Pence to resign phase of this scenario, but there’s a problem. That would mean President Pelosi, and likely President (one of the D candidates), and they’d rather commit Treason in the Defense of Slavery let Trump burn it all down before swallowing that bitter pill.

    The Circus is coming to town, and the House vote is the first ring for them to start their Bozo Cosplay.

  5. 5.

    Aleta

    October 29, 2019 at 10:08 am

    Thanks for this good post.

  6. 6.

    narya

    October 29, 2019 at 10:08 am

    These folks actually kind of give me chills–some of us with pedestrian desk jobs (well, me, anyway) wonder if I’d have the courage to do the right thing like that.

  7. 7.

    jonas

    October 29, 2019 at 10:13 am

    Funny, when a certain other LTC, Oliver North, was on Capitol Hill a generation ago testifying about how he helped the Reagan administration *commit* foreign policy corruption, conservatives called him a Great American Patriot. At least there’s a perverse consistency in how they approach these things.

  8. 8.

    mapghimagsik

    October 29, 2019 at 10:16 am

    All these smears roughly translate to “Tick tock, mutherfucker”

  9. 9.

    Barbara

    October 29, 2019 at 10:18 am

    @narya: From time to time I help people get asylum. I don’t like to say too much about it, and they have different kinds of stories. Some are just unlucky because of who they happened to be related to, but others have taken unbelievable risks out of conviction that progress was worth it. And when they come here, in some cases, the wolf is at the door almost instantly, all the time, and I am in awe of how they managed to survive. Duffy and his high profile wife would be whimpering and whining from morning until sunset if they had to face even a tenth of what these people have endured. Duffy is the same guy who whined to a town hall audience that his six figure congressional salary wasn’t enough for him to live on.

  10. 10.

    Aleta

    October 29, 2019 at 10:20 am

    Mieke Eoyang @MiekeEoyang

    I cannot tell you how despicable it is for GOP members to be questioning the loyalty of an American who has risked his life in service to our nation, based on where he was born.

    This kind of nativism is gross and beneath you.

  11. 11.

    Betty Cracker

    October 29, 2019 at 10:22 am

    The dual loyalty allegations against Lt. Colonel Vindman are despicable and xenophobic. They have a special anti-Semitic resonance too, especially since Trump’s rise to power inspired torch-carrying Nazis to march in the streets chanting “Jews will not replace us” and the anti-immigrant hysteria Trump foments was cited by another Nazi who murdered American Jews in a synagogue a little more than a year ago.

  12. 12.

    Cheryl Rofer

    October 29, 2019 at 10:22 am

    Even Liz Cheney…

    INTERESTING … @Liz_Cheney
    calls on people to stop questoning the patriotism of Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman: "It is shameful to question their patriotism, their love of this country"

    — Jake Sherman (@JakeSherman) October 29, 2019

  13. 13.

    gene108

    October 29, 2019 at 10:23 am

    Whatever happened to respecting our troops?

    These are the same people outraged by a “General Betrayus” ad, but are not calling a Lt. Col. a spy and worse.

    Hypocrites.

  14. 14.

    sigaba

    October 29, 2019 at 10:29 am

    @gene108: Troops are to be seen and not heard.

  15. 15.

    Gin & Tonic

    October 29, 2019 at 10:29 am

    In Soviet times this was called “agitprop.”

  16. 16.

    rp

    October 29, 2019 at 10:31 am

    Putting aside how absolutely despicable this line of attack is, I wonder if it will backfire because it’s so obviously coordinated. We all know there are talking points circulated in the RW ecosystem, but usually they’re a little more subtle about it. But now all of the sudden you have a bunch of different people making the same exact point within hours of the news breaking about this guy.

  17. 17.

    Amir Khalid

    October 29, 2019 at 10:31 am

    @jonas:
    They see everything through their “party before country” tinted glasses.

  18. 18.

    hells littlest angel

    October 29, 2019 at 10:33 am

    @Betty Cracker: Let’s not forget the Charlottesville nazis’ other chant: “Russia is our friend.”

  19. 19.

    Aleta

    October 29, 2019 at 10:33 am

    There should be survivalist courses for (or TV shows about) politicians and media people in which they learn to survive working 2-3 min. wage jobs with changing hours, without a car, insecure housing, paperwork not in their 1st language, long waits for assistance and medical help, and discrimination every day.

  20. 20.

    SFAW

    October 29, 2019 at 10:36 am

    @Aleta:

    Mieke Eoyang @MiekeEoyang

    I cannot tell you how despicable it is for GOP members to be questioning the loyalty of an American who has risked his life in service to our nation, based on where he was born.

    This kind of nativism is gross and beneath you.

    She’s wrong. Just as there is no Peak Wingnut, there is no bottom to the perfidy, anti-Americanism, and all-around disgusting behavior and mindset of the RWMFs.

  21. 21.

    jimmiraybob

    October 29, 2019 at 10:40 am

    “… let Trump burn it all down before swallowing that bitter pill.”

    Isn’t burning it all down part of the plan? At least among a significant set of the Trump anarcho, lost-cause, christo, patriot-militia, rage-media cult? And Putin.

  22. 22.

    Karen Weisz

    October 29, 2019 at 10:40 am

    @Barbara: Is Duffy the Sean on Real World?

  23. 23.

    Roger Moore

    October 29, 2019 at 10:41 am

    @sigaba:

    Troops are to be seen and not heard.

    So much this. “The troops” are a prop and a cudgel to be used against the Democrats, but are valueless as human beings. It says everything about Republicans that they can bleat about supporting the troops while failing to buy them body armor, letting them get electrocuted in unsafe housing, and/or trying to cut funding for the VA.

  24. 24.

    low-tech cyclist

    October 29, 2019 at 10:41 am

    UC Berkeley Law School should kick John Yoo’s ass right out of their institution for his smears of Vindman. Nobody who casually accuses someone of espionage just because of where they were born deserves to be teaching law at Podunk U. Law School, let alone one of America’s most prestigious law schools.

    (Berkeley should have never hired Yoo in the first place, but that’s water under the bridge.)

  25. 25.

    low-tech cyclist

    October 29, 2019 at 10:46 am

    @Aleta:

    There should be survivalist courses for (or TV shows about) politicians and media people in which they learn to survive working 2-3 min. wage jobs with changing hours, without a car, insecure housing, paperwork not in their 1st language, long waits for assistance and medical help, and discrimination every day.

    Fuck yeah. Our elites can relate to the ‘difficulties’ of getting by on $250,000 a year, but are insensitive to the challenges of managing on one-tenth of that amount.

  26. 26.

    zhena gogolia

    October 29, 2019 at 10:47 am

    @Gin & Tonic:

    This is depressing the hell out of me.

  27. 27.

    Betty Cracker

    October 29, 2019 at 10:48 am

    @hells littlest angel: Seriously? Somehow I missed that, but I am not really surprised…

  28. 28.

    OzarkHillbilly

    October 29, 2019 at 10:48 am

    @low-tech cyclist: (Berkeley should have never hired Yoo in the first place, but that’s a fetid cesspool under the bridge.)

    FTFY.

  29. 29.

    clay

    October 29, 2019 at 10:53 am

    So, if I follow the RWNJ “thinking” on this matter, a Ukrainian spy managed to place himself at the highest level of government — serving as a security adviser to the President — in order to…?

    I don’t get the alleged endgame here. Who is he supposed to be working for? The government of Ukraine? If so, then they ordered him to come forward to Congress, buy why? If Ukraine wanted to bust Trump on this, then they could just release their own transcript of the phone call. Why would Ukraine burn their own high-level source when they could leave him in place to do more nefarious deeds?

    I know, I know… it’s not supposed to make sense, but… this really doesn’t make any sense!!!

  30. 30.

    Just Chuck

    October 29, 2019 at 10:53 am

    A Ukrainian spy they say? Guess the Fox producers have gotten so lazy they just turned their jobs over to RT. Really don’t think it’s gaining any traction here in the USA, just makes the GOP look even more like Russian puppets.

  31. 31.

    low-tech cyclist

    October 29, 2019 at 10:57 am

    @OzarkHillbilly: Can’t argue with your fix!

  32. 32.

    Ocotillo

    October 29, 2019 at 11:01 am

    @Gin & Tonic: Aren’t Laura Igraham’s kids from Russia? Does that mean they will grow up with dual loyalty and become double agents?

  33. 33.

    MattF

    October 29, 2019 at 11:03 am

    @clay: The Illuminati have their reasons, beyond the ken of ordinary mortals.

    But, y’know, seriously… self-contradiction is a hallmark of classic antisemitism. Jews are bankers and revolutionary nihilists. My advice is to regard self-contradiction as a tell, and see the true picture without sentimental distortion.

  34. 34.

    OzarkHillbilly

    October 29, 2019 at 11:05 am

    @Ocotillo: AHA! She is ground zero in the plot to embed Russian agents in the very fabric of American TV!

  35. 35.

    Roger Moore

    October 29, 2019 at 11:05 am

    @clay:

    I know, I know… it’s not supposed to make sense, but… this really doesn’t make any sense!!!

    This isn’t about having a coherent narrative for why Lt. Col. Vindman was doing what he was doing. It’s about providing an emotional justification for rejecting him as a dangerous other, even though he’s somebody who should be highly credible by ordinary right-wing thinking.

  36. 36.

    hells littlest angel

    October 29, 2019 at 11:05 am

    @Betty Cracker: Yes, seriously.

    newsweek.com/leaders-charlottesvilles-alt-right-protest-all-have-ties-russian-fascist-651384

    thedailybeast.com/richard-spencer-and-white-supremacists-return-to-charlottesville-chanting-you-will…

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unite_the_Right_rally

  37. 37.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    October 29, 2019 at 11:07 am

    Julia Davis Retweeted Toluse Olorunnipa
    Fox News: “We should honor Tulsi Gabbard for her service. Her loyalty to this country can’t be questioned.”

    Also Fox News: “Let’s disregard Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman’s service and insinuate he’s a spy.”

    and on CNN, a former MTV…. whatever they are… has been hired to spread the same nonsense, because the Tenets of High Broderism demand that nativist demagoguery get its equal time.

    Hasn’t Tapper been known to call out his own network on shit like this? I think of CNN as The USA Today on TV, so I tend to only see what they do on twitter.

  38. 38.

    Ella in New Mexico

    October 29, 2019 at 11:11 am

    Sean Duffy and his counterparts on CNN aside, most of this latest propaganda smear is being conducted by one nationally visible, politically powerful ( in terms of Republican base voters) “news” organization: FOX. Fox is now clearly coordinating daily in the PR attack from the Trump War Room. It is literally the official WH communications center.

    Without the mainstream accessibility of FOX, any of the online RW sources would only get a small amount of traction in the base, mostly because a large chunk of them DON’T LIKE TO READ MORE THAN 5 SENTENCES much less surf the internet for long-form journalism. And Twitter still baffles a crap ton of them. No, Facebook and Fox are where the majority of Trump Cultists get their news.

    It’s clear we have a huge danger in allowing a major “cable news” organization to be a wholly owned subsidiary of not just one party but of a literal Political Cult’s re-election efforts. I’m not sure what we can do as a nation but unless we fix this issue, we’re not going to be able to get an inch of sunlight between the Republican Base and Trump’s Republican Regime.

    Seriously, without decimating the 1st Amendment, we need to fix this issue somehow or we’re dead. Whether by campaign finance laws that take away licenses from the likes of Fox or (any network) that literally coordinates campaign activities with one party to reinstituting the Fairness Doctrine, we have to come up with a smart and constitutional way to shut these people down.

  39. 39.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    October 29, 2019 at 11:11 am

    Aaron Rupar @ atrupar
    Sean Duffy on CNN on Army Lt. Col. Vindman: “It seems very clear that he is incredibly concerned about Ukrainian defense. I don’t know that he’s concerned about American policy … we all have an affinity to our homeland where we came from … he has an affinity for the Ukraine.

    we all have an affinity to our homeland where we came from
    so much to unpack there…. “we”… “all”…. “came from”….

  40. 40.

    rikyrah

    October 29, 2019 at 11:12 am

    Trump reportedly also pressured China for political help

    Rachel Maddow shows that contrary to arguments by Trump defenders that Trump was only kidding when he called on China to investigate Joe Biden’s son, reports from multiple sources suggest otherwise; that Ukraine isn’t the only country Trump pressured to help his personal, domestic politics.

  41. 41.

    OzarkHillbilly

    October 29, 2019 at 11:14 am

    Over at Mother Jones: Trump Supporters Want John Roberts to Recuse Himself From Impeachment Trial

    Follow me, if you will, on a brief hypothetical journey. Let’s say the House of Representatives draws up and passes articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump. Per the Constitution, Chief Justice John Roberts would preside over Trump’s trial in the Senate. Now, imagine Roberts—a George W. Bush appointee—recusing himself from the trial because he once publicly emphasized judges’ responsibility to act in a non-partisan manner.

    That’s how influential Trump supporter and radio host John Cardillo would have it, the conservative Washington Times reported Sunday. Cardillo claims that a statement made by Roberts in November 2018—in response to Trump’s criticism of a federal judge—means that he is biased against the president.

    “We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges,” Roberts wrote last year in a statement released by the court’s public information office. “What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them.”

    For Cardillo, these comments are apparently disqualifying. “There is already a crisis of confidence among the American people that we have a fair system of justice,” he said, according to the Times. “When you have a chief justice of the Supreme Court overtly making comments that are derogatory to the president of the United States, take all speculation out of the process.”

  42. 42.

    rikyrah

    October 29, 2019 at 11:14 am

    Impeachment witness says he reported Trump’s Ukraine ploy —twice

    Rachel Maddow shares New York Times reporting on, and reads highlights from, Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman’s planned opening statement to House impeachment committees Tuesday, in which he describes being alarmed by Donald Trump’s quid pro quo offer to the president of Ukraine and reporting it to a superior. Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, member of the House Intelligence Committee, shares his reaction.

  43. 43.

    Rand Careaga

    October 29, 2019 at 11:15 am

    So Vindman was planted here, presumably following a KGB crash course in espionage tradecraft, before his fourth birthday to establish his “’legend.” You gotta say this for Soros and the Deep State, man, they plan ahead. Not like the Trumpkins, who are always ineptly improvising.

  44. 44.

    rikyrah

    October 29, 2019 at 11:15 am

    Trump Baghdadi blurting hurts US operations and national security

    Courtney Kube, NBC News national security and military correspondent, talks with Rachel Maddow about how Donald Trump’s poor impulse control and fondness for self-aggrandizement led him not only to make false claims about the raid that killed Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, but to reveal classified and tactical details that hurt future operations and U.S. national security.

  45. 45.

    rikyrah

    October 29, 2019 at 11:17 am

    Army officer who heard Trump’s Ukraine call voiced his concerns to superiors

    Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman plans to tell House impeachment investigators that he heard Trump appeal to Ukraine’s president to investigate one of his leading political rivals, a request the aide considered so damaging to American interests that he reported it to a superior. Lawrence O’Donnell discusses with Josh Lederman, Michael McFaul, Evelyn Farkas, and Jonathan Alter.
    Oct. 28, 2019

  46. 46.

    MattF

    October 29, 2019 at 11:18 am

    @Ella in New Mexico: I don’t know what to do about that. Fox is extremely smart and attentive to the needs of its audience. E.g., it’s not accidental that the morning show is called Fox and Friends— if you’re an old fart, abandoned by your ungrateful children, you want Friends.

  47. 47.

    trollhattan

    October 29, 2019 at 11:19 am

    @hells littlest angel:
    Right up until Operation Barbarossa.

  48. 48.

    Patricia Kayden

    October 29, 2019 at 11:21 am

    @Cheryl Rofer: Liz Cheney doing the right thing is shocking, to say the least. She must sense that attacking a decorated soldier isn’t a winning argument.

  49. 49.

    trollhattan

    October 29, 2019 at 11:22 am

    @OzarkHillbilly:
    “influential Trump supporter and radio host John Cardillo”? Doesn’t sound very American to me. Is it time to investigate “John Cardilio”?

  50. 50.

    catclub

    October 29, 2019 at 11:24 am

    @OzarkHillbilly: That is amazing.

    “There is already a crisis of confidence among the American people that we have a fair system of justice,” he said, according to the Times. “When you have a chief justice of the Supreme Court overtly making comments that are derogatory to the president of the United States, take all speculation out of the process.”

    But remember how Trump defines being treated fairly. Then it makes perfect sense. Stating facts is derogatory to this president.

  51. 51.

    trollhattan

    October 29, 2019 at 11:24 am

    @Patricia Kayden:
    Liz is playing the long game–a Wyoming senate seat for the next forty years means not sullying herself wallowing in too much Trump. She was at that Sunday ballgame, though.

  52. 52.

    ET

    October 29, 2019 at 11:25 am

    @Aleta: Surprisingly Liz Cheney is not onboard with the Attack the Veteran Faxu News plan. Guess that even she has a line?

  53. 53.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    October 29, 2019 at 11:25 am

    Greg Dworkin @ DemFromCT
    Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Susan Collins (R-Maine) said on Monday that they will join Mitt Romney in not co-sponsoring a resolution spearheaded by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) to condemn the House’s impeachment process.

    That takes Lindsey down to fifty votes. Assuming those three (and Manchin and maybe Jones) would probably abstain, they could still pass it, I think, 50-47 or 45 or ??, but it’s going to enrage The Beast. Fredo has already added Romney to his twitter with list, along with Schiff, Pelosi and AOC.

  54. 54.

    waspuppet

    October 29, 2019 at 11:26 am

    This guy has spent more time in the US military than Sean Duffy and Donald Trump combined. But who could possibly love America and have a better grasp of geopolitics than a broke, senile game show host from Queens?

    And yes, as said above, put either of those two jokers through the experience of being a refusenik and they’d be marching a hammer and sickle down Red Square by dinnertime.

  55. 55.

    rikyrah

    October 29, 2019 at 11:27 am

    @Ocotillo:

    Aren’t Laura Igraham’s kids from Russia?

    No. They are non-White children from Central/South America.

    As a Black woman, the thought of this woman raising non-White children horrifies me.

  56. 56.

    catclub

    October 29, 2019 at 11:28 am

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist: Sean Duffy says:

    we all have an affinity to our homeland where we came from … he has an affinity for the Ukraine.

    So ask him how he thinks of ‘evangelical Christians’ who have an affinity for the defense of Israel. Does he suspect their loyalties?

  57. 57.

    hueyplongj

    October 29, 2019 at 11:29 am

    I sure as hell didn’t have Liz Cheney in the Have You No Decency Pool.

    It doesn’t count unless she copies Trump, Barr and/or McConnell.

  58. 58.

    chris

    October 29, 2019 at 11:29 am

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist: See the weak Kenyan tyrant who spent all his time in office golfing and bringing sharia law to Merka!!!

  59. 59.

    OzarkHillbilly

    October 29, 2019 at 11:30 am

    @rikyrah: Wiki says “She is a single parent of three children: a girl from Guatemala whom she adopted in 2008;[103] a boy from Russia whom she adopted at 13 months in 2009;[104] and another boy she adopted in 2011.[citation needed]”

  60. 60.

    Gravenstone

    October 29, 2019 at 11:30 am

    @OzarkHillbilly: in other words, it’s ‘Trump Judge, or Bust’!

  61. 61.

    khead

    October 29, 2019 at 11:33 am

    @Rand Careaga:

    Vindman was in the same class with Evelyn Salt.

  62. 62.

    rikyrah

    October 29, 2019 at 11:34 am

    @OzarkHillbilly:
    I will correct myself. I still recoil in horror for that daughter. The non-White in a family of Whites….Lawd Lawd Lawd.

  63. 63.

    bemused

    October 29, 2019 at 11:35 am

    @rikyrah:

    As a white woman, I’m also horrified.

  64. 64.

    Barbara

    October 29, 2019 at 11:36 am

    @Karen Weisz: He was on a reality show but I don’t know which one. That’s where he met his wife, apparently.

  65. 65.

    Cacti

    October 29, 2019 at 11:38 am

    Vindman can and should sue John Yoo and Fox News for defamation.

  66. 66.

    Gin & Tonic

    October 29, 2019 at 11:38 am

    @rikyrah:

    Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, member of the House Intelligence Committee, shares his reaction.

    Another immigrant, obviously, likely with dual loyalties as well.

  67. 67.

    RedDirtGirl

    October 29, 2019 at 11:40 am

    @sigaba: Troops should be slain and not heard, more like.

  68. 68.

    Barbara

    October 29, 2019 at 11:40 am

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist: They need 60 votes. That is what I read this morning. They were never going to pass it. They just want credit for sponsoring it.

  69. 69.

    Kelly

    October 29, 2019 at 11:43 am

    My first glance mis-read of the title was “Terrifying Today”

  70. 70.

    Patricia Kayden

    October 29, 2019 at 11:43 am

    BREAKING: A federal judge blocks an Alabama abortion ban that would have made the procedure a felony at any stage of pregnancy in almost all cases. t.co/WryG0Jun3K— The Associated Press (@AP) October 29, 2019

  71. 71.

    OzarkHillbilly

    October 29, 2019 at 11:43 am

    @rikyrah: @bemused: I’d like to hope that raising a child of color might open Ingraham’s eyes but that would be beyond ridiculous.

  72. 72.

    BC in Illinois

    October 29, 2019 at 11:44 am

    @waspuppet:

    [ Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman] has spent more time in the US military than Sean Duffy and Donald Trump combined.

    My pre-school age grandson has spent as much time in the US military as Sean Duffy and Donald Trump combined.

  73. 73.

    Mandalay

    October 29, 2019 at 11:44 am

    @MattF:

    Republican talking points about Vindman’s supposed dual loyalties have gotten to CNN via Sean Duffy, a new CNN talking head.

    On CNN the host just decried the comments of Sean Duffy. Except Duffy is paid by CNN specifically to make outrageous comments to provoke controversy.

    Mission accomplished!

    FoxNews doesn’t bother to pretend to be anything more than a shill for Trump. CNN pretends to be fair minded by employing bomb lobbers for Trump, and then hits the fainting couch in astonishment when those bomb lobbers lob bombs.

  74. 74.

    Gelfling 545

    October 29, 2019 at 11:46 am

    @Aleta: few, maybe more than a few, years back there was a challenge to eat for a month on only the amount covered by food stamps. A number of politicians tried it. I don’t believe any made it a full month.

  75. 75.

    Jeffro

    October 29, 2019 at 11:47 am

    @Kelly: Me too!

    FWIW folks, it’s pretty clear that trumpov (and now Rudy911 as well) misspell something in just about every tweet, so that us smarty-pants libs will spend most of the day posting and laughing about that, instead of the substance of whatever clusterf*** is going on in the WH that day. It’s probably a Bannon strategy from way back.

    NOBODY is dumb enough to spell it as ‘Ben Laden’, or get “oppodite’ past their spell-checker, or misspell one of their chief toadies as ‘Devin Nunez’. Come on.

  76. 76.

    low-tech cyclist

    October 29, 2019 at 11:47 am

    @Ella in New Mexico:

    Seriously, without decimating the 1st Amendment, we need to fix this issue somehow or we’re dead. Whether by campaign finance laws that take away licenses from the likes of Fox or (any network) that literally coordinates campaign activities with one party to reinstituting the Fairness Doctrine, we have to come up with a smart and constitutional way to shut these people down.

    I don’t see that the First Amendment should be a problem. Can you buy a cable TV channel? Me either.

    The justification for applying the Fairness Doctrine to broadcast TV, back in the day, was that the airwaves are a fundamentally scarce resource; at best you can only have a couple dozen broadcast TV channels in a given area, so in a very real sense, the TV stations had to represent all of us: they couldn’t be allowed to just represent the interests of their owners.

    And while there may be several hundred cable TV channels available to the average viewer, that’s still tremendously scarce when it comes to speaking rather than viewing, and after all it’s speech that the First Amendment is about. There’s no reason why the Fairness Doctrine shouldn’t be reinstated, and applied to cable TV as well as broadcast.

    Now someone is sure to ask, “how is this different from newspapers? There aren’t that many of them either!” But you can distribute your opinions via print. Anyone can. Get a couple reams of paper and a spare black ink cartridge for your printer, print up your thoughts, and hand out copies on street corners. Voila! You’re exercising freedom of the press.

    Commercial newspapers differ in resources, complexity, and (sometimes) commercial viability, but entry-level freedom of the press is accessible to all. The same is manifestly not true of access to the opportunity to speak via television or radio.

  77. 77.

    Kattails

    October 29, 2019 at 11:48 am

    @jimmiraybob: The phrase in use was drowning it (government) in a bathtub. But I’m sure they’d take burning it all down as a fine option. Except, of course, the parts that help them grift, lie, and cheat the unwashed masses. Those parts they want enshrined on stone tablets.

  78. 78.

    Gin & Tonic

    October 29, 2019 at 11:50 am

    From what I can see, the smearing of Lt. Col Vindman isn’t going the way the Republicans seem to have expected.

  79. 79.

    Gelfling 545

    October 29, 2019 at 11:50 am

    To the GOP those serving in the military are like those net bags of “army men” one can buy for a kid to play with at the dollar store. If some get lost, broken, whatever no big deal. They’ll just get more.

  80. 80.

    patrick II

    October 29, 2019 at 11:51 am

    @clay:

    So, if I follow the RWNJ “thinking” on this matter, a Ukrainian spy managed to place himself at the highest level of government — serving as a security adviser to the President — in order to…?

    To help in the Ukrainian plan to undermine elections and blame Russia.
    I think you have missed the whole frame of the fable the Republicans are telling here. According to them, and “Secret Empires: How the American Political Class Hides Corruption and Enriches Family and Friends,” a book written by Peter Schweizer (the man who wrote Clinton Cash), read and believed by Giuliani, and conveyed from Giuliani and believed by Trump, The Ukrainians were involved in the American elections by framing the Russians by making it appears the Russians illegally helped Trump while it was the Ukrainians the whole time. The Ukrainians wanted to discredit Trump, help Hillary, and aid corruption in Ukraine by making Hunter Biden rich and hide the DNC server in Ukraine, where it’s true contents would never be found.
    The fact is that it is typical Russian/Republican ratfucking, But to answer your question, that’s what the Ukrainians were supposedly up to. According to Russian propaganda picked up by Schweizer in his book, read by Giuliani and fed to Donald Trump. That Giuliani and Trump actually believe this means they are insane. The rest of the republicans going along are traitors.

  81. 81.

    Dorothy A. Winsor

    October 29, 2019 at 11:51 am

    @Lee: IOW, it’s not “beneath” them, despite what the tweet in the post says. There is nothing beneath them.

  82. 82.

    Betty Cracker

    October 29, 2019 at 11:54 am

    @Barbara: Graham was on Twitter a while ago trying to pass off Pelosi’s decision to hold a vote Thursday as a victory for his Dear Leader Loyalty Bill. He implied he would table it but keep an eye on House procedures to make sure they’re fair to Trump. It’s bullshit, IMO — he couldn’t even get all the Republicans to sign it, so he took this opportunity to declare victory and stop being embarrassed about not garnering more support.

  83. 83.

    Gelfling 545

    October 29, 2019 at 11:54 am

    @Rand Careaga: Maybe President Obama let him use his time mavhine.

  84. 84.

    J R in WV

    October 29, 2019 at 11:56 am

    @low-tech cyclist:

    (Berkeley should have never hired Yoo in the first place, but that’s water under the bridge.)

    You can say that again! So I did~!!~ Quoted for Truth. Yoo should be in prison for the war crimes he facilitated, not honored by a formerly prestigious Law School… I think there’s one we could send him to in Cuba, or Florence CO, if they decide he can’t be sent to a prison full of people he directly helped be mistreated.

  85. 85.

    O. Felix Culpa

    October 29, 2019 at 11:59 am

    @Patricia Kayden: Which is exactly what the forced birthers want. Their goal is to take the case to the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade. smh.

  86. 86.

    PJ

    October 29, 2019 at 11:59 am

    @low-tech cyclist: The other aspect of the Fairness Doctrine is that the airwaves are a public resource of limited bandwidth, and in exchange for their licenses, broadcasters are obligated to provide programming in the public interest. You can make an argument that a cable or streaming channel takes advantage of public resources and/or conduits, but it’s a harder sell. (But maybe not harder than reinstating the Fairness Doctrine itself.)

    Stopping the spread of lies through the mass media, whether it be Fox or Facebook, is going to have to rely on regulation, because those networks are definitely not going to do it themselves, but I have a feeling the institutional framework will have to be varied, and relying on a new Fairness Doctrine alone will not be sufficient to cover the sources and means of disseminating disinformation.

  87. 87.

    Mandalay

    October 29, 2019 at 12:03 pm

    Whoa! I just read Vindman’s statement. IANAL, but Sondland is surely in very deep trouble now, and I don’t see how “I do not recalll…” (or Trump) can save his lying ass:

    Following this meeting, there was a scheduled debriefing during which Amb. Sondland emphasized the importance that Ukraine deliver the investigations into the 2016 election, the Bidens, and Burisma. I stated to Amb. Sondland that his statements were inappropriate, that the request to investigate Biden and his son had nothing to do with national security, and that such investigations were not something the NSC was going to get involved in or push. Dr. Hill then entered the room and asserted to Amb. Sondland that his statements were inappropriate.

    Following the debriefing meeting, I reported my concerns to the NSC’s lead counsel. Dr. Hill also reported the incident to the NSC’s lead counsel.

  88. 88.

    bemused

    October 29, 2019 at 12:04 pm

    @OzarkHillbilly:

    Inexplicable to me and spouse before our immediate family became less white. Now that our family is more color diverse, I shudder even more for Ingrahams’ children growing up with that nasty far right mother.

  89. 89.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    October 29, 2019 at 12:05 pm

    OT: If you haven’t seen this, it’s a worth a couple of minutes

    Jimmy Kimmel @ jimmykimmel
    We mashed up BarackObama’s Bin Laden speech with RealDonaldTrump’s al-Baghdadi speech, and the results are amazing

    a two minute reply to anyone who’s saying “Why can’t you Libs give trump one good day!”

  90. 90.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    October 29, 2019 at 12:07 pm

    John Cole, a guy who used to post about politics here, makes a good point

    Cake or Death @ Johngcole
    29m29 minutes ago
    And complete silence from big mouth DanCrenshawTX

    A new witness is about to damage Trump. Fox News is already smearing him.

    remember when twitter took to their fainting couches because Pete Davidson said Crenshaw looked like a movie villain?

  91. 91.

    PST

    October 29, 2019 at 12:12 pm

    What in the world could be more logical than for Ukraine officials to seek advice from the NSC expert on their country when faced with demands from a private citizen purporting to speak for the President but making demands far outside the State Department’s normal policy? The first question I would ask is, “You’re a White House staffer. Is this guy for real? Should we be dealing with him?”

  92. 92.

    Gelfling 545

    October 29, 2019 at 12:15 pm

    @bemused: Frankly, the thought of her raising any children is horrifying.

  93. 93.

    J R in WV

    October 29, 2019 at 12:17 pm

    No one can “give” Drumpf a good day, he has to achieve a good day on his own. And he evidently cannot do that on his own!

    This great video montage shows why and how that works!

  94. 94.

    Barbara

    October 29, 2019 at 12:17 pm

    @PST: Who else, exactly, were they supposed to ask?

  95. 95.

    Barbara

    October 29, 2019 at 12:20 pm

    @Betty Cracker: Well, for sure, they will now need to move the goalposts yet AGAIN. “Okay, we asked for it to be public, but now the problem is . . . . ”

    Of course Pelosi and Schiff know this, and I assume that Schiff, in particular, just wanted to lay down a record of what happened before turning to proceed in public. You know, like they did with the Benghazi hearings, which were virtually all non-public events.

  96. 96.

    bemused

    October 29, 2019 at 12:26 pm

    @Gelfling 545:

    True. I’d be worried about her pets too if she had any.

  97. 97.

    PJ

    October 29, 2019 at 12:26 pm

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist: The “why can’t you let Trump have one good day?!!!” plea makes it sound like he’s a twelve year old girl who’s having a hard time in middle school, nobody likes her and everybody’s mean to her, and, ok, yes, she lies a little (well, ok, all the time) but it’s just because she wants people to like her, and, sure, she’s made a few mistakes (ok, a department store full of mistakes), and she’s been mean (but only to people who deserve it!!), but, come on, guys, she’s really trying hard, she really means well and no one appreciates it and why can’t you let her have just have one good day for herself!!!!!

  98. 98.

    hueyplong

    October 29, 2019 at 12:30 pm

    @PJ: True, but for perspective, as always, some kids in cages would like a word.

  99. 99.

    Ceci n est pas mon nym

    October 29, 2019 at 12:42 pm

    @Roger Moore: “Support the troops” means “Fuck the troops, support the defense contractors”.

    I worked in defense acquisition. Can’t tell you how many hours of my life were spent in arguments with defense contractors over seemingly picayune requirements. “We believe it meets the letter of the requirement.” “But it does not do what the soldier needs it to do. People. Will. Die.” “We believe it meets the letter of the requirement.”

  100. 100.

    rikyrah

    October 29, 2019 at 12:43 pm

    @PJ:

    The “why can’t you let Trump have one good day?!!!” plea

    one of the ultimates in White Privilege.

  101. 101.

    peter

    October 29, 2019 at 12:43 pm

    @Ella in New Mexico: Yes Fox is very clever. My arch-conservative FIL used to watch Fox News, and It dawned on me after a while how this works. They tell you what you want to hear, which gets you to stick around long enough that they can tell you what they want you to hear. The second part of the transaction is what matters, but most Fox consumers probably get only the first part.

  102. 102.

    Chip Daniels

    October 29, 2019 at 12:45 pm

    Republicans spit on returning American veteran.

  103. 103.

    rikyrah

    October 29, 2019 at 12:46 pm

    That’s because his lying azz is up to his eyeballs in all this mess.

    Pence cagey in response to straightforward Ukraine scandal question
    10/29/19 10:25 AM—UPDATED 10/29/19 10:50 AM
    By Steve Benen

    On Sunday morning, much of the country’s attention was focused on Donald Trump’s announcement on the demise of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, and for good reason. When a military raid leads to the death of ISIS’s founder and leader, it’s a major development of international significance.

    But also on Sunday morning, Vice President Mike Pence sat down with CBS News’ Margaret Brennan, who asked on Face the Nation about the Trump administration’s ongoing Ukraine scandal. The host noted, for example, that at least four U.S. officials have now testified under oath about their knowledge of a proposed deal with Ukraine about a Biden-related investigation. Brennan asked, “Are they all lying?”

    Pence replied, “Well, I can only tell you what I know. And what I know is that the transcript of [Trump’s] call with President Zelensky shows that there was no quid pro quo.”

    It was a problematic response for a few reasons. The “transcript,” for example, was really more of a call summary, and it may not fully reflect a word-for-word record of what was said. What’s more, the summary is actually quite incriminating – which is why the White House’s allies believe it was a “huge mistake” for Trump to release it – a fact that’s made worse by additional details that have since come to light.

    But of even greater interest was Pence’s assertion that he’s only prepared to say what he personally knows. In other words, the vice president wasn’t prepared to endorse the White House’s talking points in their entirety, so much as he was willing to speak to his own narrow vantage point.

    This became a problematic posture when the host asked, over and over again, whether Pence was aware of the larger scheme Team Trump was trying to execute with Ukraine.

  104. 104.

    PJ

    October 29, 2019 at 12:48 pm

    @hueyplong: For the crimes and and cruel and inhuman acts he has encouraged in others and committed himself, Trump deserves to have extremely bad days for the rest of an unnaturally prolonged life.

    ETA: Not to mention the treason and general degradation of the US.

  105. 105.

    oatler.

    October 29, 2019 at 12:49 pm

    “bomb lobbers lob bombs.”
    Excellent! Like The Bob Loblaw Law Blog.
    Also, fuck Scott Baio.

  106. 106.

    Immanentize

    October 29, 2019 at 12:55 pm

    @Mandalay: Well, I guess they have settled on the person who will fall for all the bad acts — Sondland.

  107. 107.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    October 29, 2019 at 12:55 pm

    that number again…

    James Hohmann
    @ jameshohmann
    New poll from Suffolk University & USA Today shows most Americans want Trump to stop stonewalling. Asked if the White House has an obligation to comply with the subpoenas from Congress, 66% say yes. Only 26% say no. Even 35% of R’s say WH ought to comply.

  108. 108.

    Jonas

    October 29, 2019 at 12:56 pm

    @clay:

    I know, I know… it’s not supposed to make sense, but… this really doesn’t make any sense!!!

    You clearly don’t watch enough Fox or listen to AM radio.

  109. 109.

    Mary G

    October 29, 2019 at 1:03 pm

    LTC Vinland’s opening statement is more evidence that Americans who immigrate here are what make America great. It must have been excruciating for him to do the right thing by reporting up the chain of command and see nothing done. If Twitler had had his way, people like this would have been purged from government for disloyalty and replaced with a military Jim Jordan, a incurious know-nothing whose ability to kiss Twitler’s ass would be the only thing he was good at.

    When the horrors of election night 2016 sunk in and everyone was on team WASF, I was optimistic that America would reject Twitler like a bacterial infection is beat back by a dose of penicillin and a mass of white blood cells.

    It has been so painful to believe I was wrong over the 2+ years of one ghastly Infrastructure Week after another, but the crowd at the World Series and this military man who has undoubtedly been ordered to keep his mouth shut, but decided to obey his conscience instead make me feel hopeful again.

  110. 110.

    Cacti

    October 29, 2019 at 1:03 pm

    @rikyrah:

    one of the ultimates in White Privilege.

    It’s like a sniveling sidekick crying for the school bully or the queen bee mean girl when s/he finally gets a well deserved comeuppance.

  111. 111.

    rikyrah

    October 29, 2019 at 1:04 pm

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist:

    Only 26% say no.

    The crazyfication factor doesn’t fail..LOL

  112. 112.

    hueyplong

    October 29, 2019 at 1:05 pm

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist: Was wondering when the rapidly aging 27% might morph into a slightly lower number.

    I do not believe it is due to minds being changed in the core support group.

  113. 113.

    Jeffro

    October 29, 2019 at 1:06 pm

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist: The attacks on Vindman are enraging Dems, independents, and half-sane Repubs…

    …and it looks like, on social media at least, they’re reminding everyone that this is a GOP (ie, not just trumpov) pattern. See also John Kerry/swiftboating/Purple Heart band-aids, mocking McCain as a POW, and attacking the (Gold Star family) Khans.

    Jump on it, Dems. Jump. On. It. We are the party that respects our troops and their service, NOT the trumpublicans.

  114. 114.

    Jeffro

    October 29, 2019 at 1:08 pm

    @peter: Exactly. They troll you with outrage after outrage until something ‘hooks’ your attention…and then they get you outraged about their issues.

    There’s a psychology at work there that’s also covered in that book I want to review, ‘Mindf*ck’. Get people angry and they lose their sense of rational thought…VERY easy to manipulate.

  115. 115.

    J. Squid

    October 29, 2019 at 1:10 pm

    @Betty Cracker: Oh, yes. The dual loyalty accusation which was recently suggested was the problem with all Jews. I remember it well because it was, like, 2 fucking months ago.

    Make no mistake. This is specifically and pointedly an antisemitic attack. Which they are more than happy to combine with their general cries of, “Following our rules for impeachment is illegitimate!” Because the GOP has been co-opted by nazis, nazi sympathizers and nazi collaborators.

  116. 116.

    Jeffro

    October 29, 2019 at 1:12 pm

    @Jeffro: PS I should add that I’ve seen this at work first-hand with RWNJ dad’s 2nd wife/my stepmom. Classic garden variety quiet left-leaning Dem on most issues. But starting a few years ago, with RWNJ dad’s tv constantly on to Fox and its trolling, she sure went hard right.

    As best I can reconstruct, Fox’s trolling on LGBTQ (emphasis on the ‘T’) issues got her worked up and susceptible to the rest o their BS…until now, where one of her current political views is that she thinks the economy was in the toilet until January 21, 2017, when it magically began its ascent into the stratosphere. Not kidding.

  117. 117.

    jonas

    October 29, 2019 at 1:13 pm

    @rikyrah: The administration’s argument is basically that unless you literally say the words “quid pro quo” in the conversation, there was no quid pro quo.

    Seems airtight.

  118. 118.

    catclub

    October 29, 2019 at 1:14 pm

    @Ceci n est pas mon nym:

    “We believe it meets the letter of the requirement.”

    I bet this phrase is used when they would like to actually meet the requirement, but that would cost more money.

    If it actually DOES meet the requirement, then the costing lives part is on the people who wrote the requirements. Which I know from a teensy bit
    of experience, is hard to get right.

  119. 119.

    bluehill

    October 29, 2019 at 1:15 pm

    @Mandalay:

    Sondland is surely in very deep trouble now, and I don’t see how “I do not recalll…” (or Trump) can save his lying ass

    Hoping the former prosecutors in House can begin to pressure these guys to roll over. Sondland seems like a good target because he’s got a lot of money to lose.

  120. 120.

    oatler.

    October 29, 2019 at 1:16 pm

    Watching The View right now and of course Meghan McCain is saying “but Hillary Clinton said…” and “my father…”

  121. 121.

    jonas

    October 29, 2019 at 1:17 pm

    @Jeffro:

    Jump on it, Dems. Jump. On. It. We are the party that respects our troops and their service, NOT the trumpublicans.

    Given the proven ability of Democrats to quickly coordinate talking points, cut ads, and project a clear, unified message across multiple media platforms to take advantage of a narrative like this while its still hot, I’m sure this will quickly gain traction.

    Also, the sky in my world is bright green with pink polkadots.

  122. 122.

    rikyrah

    October 29, 2019 at 1:17 pm

    @Jeffro:

    Remember Max Cleland…..

  123. 123.

    Mai naem mobile

    October 29, 2019 at 1:17 pm

    Sean Duffy is around 50 and therefore would have had an opportunity to serve but ofcourse he didnt . He said he was resigning from Congress because the 9th or 10th child his wife had has medical challenges. So why is he on teevee. His wife gave birth a couple of weeks ago. He needs to disappear like they want HRC to disappear. BTW the baby has Downs. Duffy’s wife is close to 50 as well(49IIRC.) I dont care if I sound judgmental but why are you having a kid ar that age when you have 8-9 other kids and you know there’s a significant chance of birth abnormalities? This is not the 1800s with an agricultural economy with high child mortality rates. God did not intend for humans to do this

  124. 124.

    catclub

    October 29, 2019 at 1:18 pm

    @J. Squid:

    The dual loyalty accusation which was recently suggested was the problem with all Jews. I remember it well because it was, like, 2 fucking months ago.

    If I remember correctly, Trump’s version two months ago was kind of weird. It was accusing Jews who are Democrats of not being sufficiently loyal
    to the Likud version of Israel. instead they considered the interests of the USA before those of the GOP and Likud.

  125. 125.

    catclub

    October 29, 2019 at 1:20 pm

    @jonas: also requires ‘air quotes’ hand motion. All the best gangsters include that.

  126. 126.

    jonas

    October 29, 2019 at 1:20 pm

    @Jeffro:

    one of her current political views is that she thinks the economy was in the toilet until January 21, 2017, when it magically began its ascent into the stratosphere. Not kidding.

    Oh, yeah. I hear this all the time, too. The Great Recession began under Obama back in 08 — before he had even been elected, astonishingly enough — and stayed horrible until Trump was elected. It’s up there with how Reagan inherited a massive recession from Carter but reversed it with a bunch of brilliant tax cuts that totally paid for themselves and help defeat the Soviets in terms of ridiculous economic mythology.

  127. 127.

    rikyrah

    October 29, 2019 at 1:21 pm

    @Mary G:

    It has been so painful to believe I was wrong over the 2+ years of one ghastly Infrastructure Week after another, but the crowd at the World Series and this military man who has undoubtedly been ordered to keep his mouth shut, but decided to obey his conscience instead make me feel hopeful again.

    Don’t beat yourself up. How were you wrong, except for maybe that you gave those who voted for Dolt45 the benefit of the doubt?
    I always preferred Kay’s evaluation of them. She so clearly broke it down for me soon after the election:
    Those who voted for Dolt45 showed THEIR lack of character through their vote for him. He told you who he was, and you voted for him anyway.
    Once you start with that….no disappointment needed.
    Only anger with those that WILL NEVER EVER BE FORGIVEN for putting our country in this state.

  128. 128.

    Mai naem mobile

    October 29, 2019 at 1:21 pm

    I forgot my original comment about Vindman. The GOP is smearing him in this desperate way because they got nothing else. They have nothing else

  129. 129.

    Mary G

    October 29, 2019 at 1:23 pm

    Vindland, his twin brother, and their grandmother were even in a Ken Burns documentary about the Statue of Liberty as children. It’s in the WaPo sorry I can’t link on this device.

  130. 130.

    catclub

    October 29, 2019 at 1:29 pm

    @jonas: partly ignorance, partly the ‘hack-gap’ that Kevin Drum identified. Republicans were actually more miserable about the economy when a Democrat was president. When Trump was elected, GOP approval of the economy skyrocketed. Approval of the economy by Democrats fell, but not nearly as much. Also, Democrats were willing to complain about the bad economy when it was bad, and Obama was president. The hack gap, again.

  131. 131.

    Mary G

    October 29, 2019 at 1:29 pm

    @rikyrah: ? Thank you. Kay is a treasure of this blog; you are another. ?

  132. 132.

    Chief Oshkosh

    October 29, 2019 at 1:33 pm

    @rikyrah: So close to 27%…

  133. 133.

    rikyrah

    October 29, 2019 at 1:34 pm

    @Mai naem mobile:

    I forgot my original comment about Vindman. The GOP is smearing him in this desperate way because they got nothing else. They have nothing else

    Absolutely, nothing else.

    Watching LarryO from last night, it’s understandable why they’re scared.
    Vindman is military. He did what military folks do.
    HE reported it – up the food chain.
    Which means that he put it in writing – more than once – his concerns.
    Vindman did his duty. Now, the clown who received those warnings – —better decide to lawyer up…cause, he will receive the next subpoena…..

  134. 134.

    (((CassandraLeo)))

    October 29, 2019 at 1:39 pm

    @jimmiraybob: …so, I know this isn’t really the point, and it’s kind of a minor issue in the sea of corruption and antisemitism going on here, but… there’s nothing anarchist about any of this president*’s supporters. The word “anarchism” literally derives from Greek terms meaning “without rulers”, which is in fact a succinct definition of the actual philosophy of anarchism: it strives to eliminate hierarchies, whether of private or public origin – government or business. A person who wants to trade in one set of rulers for another is not an anarchist; so-called “anarcho”-capitalism is an oxymoron resulting from a deliberate (but not particularly successful) attempt to hijack an existing philosophy by right-wingers (they were much more successful coopting “libertarian”, which was coined by the French anarchist-communist Joseph Déjacque as a descriptor for his philosophy).

    T’s supporters are, seemingly without exception, quite OK with authoritarianism. It’s difficult to get much further from anarchism than that. The “burn it all down” set, meanwhile, fundamentally misunderstands what anarchism is about. Some of them may want to claim the label of anarchism for themselves, but their understanding of anarchism is half-baked and juvenile at best. If you simply bring the current social order down with nothing to replace it, there’s no guarantee that what replaces it will be better. Given the current state of the world, bringing down governments would simply result in corporations rushing to fill the void. I doubt any of today’s armchair revolutionaries would be very happy with that result.

    This is a dichotomy I’ve written about before in radical circles: the builder versus destroyer dichotomy, which corresponds roughly to reformists versus revolutionaries. The latter thinks the entire system is too corrupt to be saved, which to be honest is a view I somewhat sympathise with. But that’s not an excuse for simply disengaging from trying to improve people’s lives on a day-to-day basis. If the current system is impossible to salvage, the proper solution is to make new institutions that can replace the old system, rather than to simply destroy the old one.

    A good model for this is Occupy Sandy, a charity that cropped up in the wake of its eponymous storm around 2012. It was centred around ad-hoc organisation on social media, on the principle of finding a need and addressing it. Even the Fuck the Fucking New York Times acknowledged that it was doing better work than a lot of existing charities in addressing people’s needs in the wake of said storm. If you object to existing businesses and governments – an objection I entirely share – then before trying to tear down the latter, it’s important to have something else in place to fill the void before simply trying to pull them out of existence.

    Occupy Sandy is a potential model for the sort of infrastructure that could be put in place to stabilise society and avoid the absolute chaos that otherwise might result from the collapse of government (what anarchist Alan Moore contrasted in V for Vendetta as “the Land of Do-As-You-Please” – i.e., anarchy – versus “the Land of Take-What-You-Want” – i.e., chaos). Worker-run co-ops are another potential example on the business side. And there are others.

    Anyhow, none of T’s supporters are anarchists, no matter how much a few misguided people among them might want to claim the label for themselves. It’s possible to support existing politicians within the system and still qualify as an anarchist (I’m supporting Warren and would also be perfectly happy with Harris), but those politicians have to support policies conducive to the kind of organisation necessary to create anarchism. The chaos of the T administration* hasn’t assisted that in the slightest. If it’s necessary to organise against the government putting kids in cages, then there’s a lot less time to create Occupy Sandy-like charities and the like.

    I actually have a lot more I could say about this, but I need to head off to work, so I’ll have to cut it short here. If the thread’s still active and I remember when I return home, I might add more then.

    Ceterum censeo factionem Republicanam esse delendam.

  135. 135.

    (((CassandraLeo)))

    October 29, 2019 at 1:40 pm

    @jonas: …does this mean that if you don’t say the word “murder”, it doesn’t count as murder? Asking for a president* who wants to shoot a guy on Fifth Avenue.

    Ceterum censeo factionem Republicanam esse delendam.

  136. 136.

    Mandalay

    October 29, 2019 at 1:43 pm

    @gene108:

    These are the same people outraged by a “General Betrayus” ad…

    The exquisite irony being, of course, that Petraeus really did betray us. He betrayed not only his wife, but also national security, and he made himself a potential blackmail target, and continued to deny everything even though they had the goods on him.

    Even the RWNJs who had been pushing him as a possible president tossed him into the sewer. He’s so tainted even Trump wouldn’t have him. And now the vile fucker wanders from some non-profit to some think tank to some partnership, shunned by polite society and all decent Americans. Fuck him.

  137. 137.

    Kay

    October 29, 2019 at 1:44 pm

    Alan Rappeport
    @arappeport
    ·2h
    Kushner, in Saudi, says enthusiasm for Trump in US is greater than it has ever been.

    Their sense of entitlement extends to their belief that people have a duty to love them. They are not only entitled to positions of power, wealth and access, unearned, from birth, but they also petulantly demand we like them. Because they’re owed that.

  138. 138.

    MattF

    October 29, 2019 at 1:46 pm

    NYT has a rundown of RW smears against Vindman.

  139. 139.

    Ceci n est pas mon nym

    October 29, 2019 at 1:49 pm

    @catclub: In many cases that person was me, though sometimes I found my requirement had changed in crucial ways after it left my hands.

  140. 140.

    rikyrah

    October 29, 2019 at 1:52 pm

    @Kay:

    Their sense of entitlement extends to their belief that people have a duty to love them. They are not only entitled to positions of power, wealth and access, unearned, from birth, but they also petulantly demand we like them. Because they’re owed that.

    You have said this for awhile, Kay, and you are correct. It galls – their sense that we MUST LOVE THEM

  141. 141.

    Kay

    October 29, 2019 at 1:52 pm

    David Williams
    @dznyc
    · 1h
    Replying to @daveweigel
    Gabbard has the support of 2% of Democrats, 7% of independents, and 28% of Republicans.

    It would just be delightful if the big spoiler plan ended up taking votes from Trump. She is a Republican though- she’s much closer to that end than my end. They know it when they see it.

  142. 142.

    Barbara

    October 29, 2019 at 1:57 pm

    Just saw this in the Washington Post. Apparently, Vindman has a twin, who is also a ranking officer in the U.S. military, working for the NSC. Even more remarkably, his family happened to be filmed as part of Ken Burns’ documentary on New York City. washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/10/29/fundamentally-un-american-attacks-alexander-vindman/

    I remember how I nearly cried during the penultimate scene in Moscow on the Hudson, when Robin Williams cries in despair about how hard life in the U.S. is, on the fourth of July, in a diner, and the other people in the restaurant reply to him by quoting from the Declaration of Independence.

  143. 143.

    Roger Moore

    October 29, 2019 at 1:58 pm

    @Ceci n est pas mon nym:

    “Support the troops” means “Fuck the troops, support the defense contractors”.

    The way I most frequently hear “Support the Troops” uses is more of “Support the war”. It’s a way of squelching any criticism of the reasons for or conduct of the war because doing so is supposedly demoralizing to the troops.

  144. 144.

    Jojo

    October 29, 2019 at 2:00 pm

    @MattF: Duffy is another embarrassment from my state, right up there with half-wit Trump mouthpiece Ron Johnson, who seems desperate to insert himself into this med in the dumbest way possible.

  145. 145.

    Yutsano

    October 29, 2019 at 2:06 pm

    I keep seeing all this and I wonder. What happens when Herr Drumpf is gone? He’s not a healthy man. He’s in the most trouble he’s ever been in his life. One way or another his reign will end. And then what? What does conservatism stand for at that point? Republicans have been exposed for most of the country as either sycophants or cowards. When the cult leader dies, what happens then? Because this HAS to end.

    @Jojo: You still have cheese curds. Tasty tasty cheese curds. I am so looking forward to that in a couple of days.

  146. 146.

    catclub

    October 29, 2019 at 2:09 pm

    @Roger Moore: Support the troops… bring them home! has never quite caught on.

  147. 147.

    Mary G

    October 29, 2019 at 2:13 pm

    @Yutsano: Axios says on Twitter that Republicans are quietly worried about losing the 2020 elections – President, Senate, and House – in a landslide. That’s what they deserve. A timeout of a decade or two, or the party going under completely. OK, that’s a pipedream I have.

  148. 148.

    catclub

    October 29, 2019 at 2:13 pm

    @Yutsano:

    What happens when Herr Drumpf is gone?

    memory hole, plus the Democrats are worse.

    Except for not blaming Obama, but Bush, for the bad economy for three plus years,
    it was effectively 18months before ‘Democrats are worse’ and the House election in 2010.

  149. 149.

    catclub

    October 29, 2019 at 2:15 pm

    @Mary G:

    A timeout of a decade or two, or the party going under completely. OK, that’s a pipedream I have.

    If the Democrats cannot fix everything in 18 months, it is right back to the GOP being the hope of the nation.
    Happy to be wrong.

  150. 150.

    Ladyraxterinok

    October 29, 2019 at 2:19 pm

    Haven’t read comments.

    Has anyone noted lt colonel testifying and his twin were in a docu about statue of liberty and immigrants’ reactions?

    Tweet with links to photos of twins at different ages was at democraticunderground this morn

  151. 151.

    JR

    October 29, 2019 at 2:21 pm

    I know this isn’t a sports-focused site, but there are some Deadspin readers here.

    In any event, it seems like the site is going into a VC-driven death spiral at this moment.

  152. 152.

    Crashman

    October 29, 2019 at 2:26 pm

    @JR: Yeah this is really tragic. I love that site and just about everyone who writes there, especially David Roth. Damn VCs…

  153. 153.

    Elizabelle

    October 29, 2019 at 2:27 pm

    @catclub:

    I think you are going to be wrong. Particularly if we see some meaningful redistricting reform and voting rights legislation. The GOP has not been the hope of the nation for a long goddamned time. It’s why they have to cheat and hoover up foreign money.

    And that kind of pessimism and cynicism is what makes me want to reduce my Balloon Juice habit. Lighten up you fucker. Can you not see how hard it is for us to be living through these times? Why do you have to try to make it seem worse?

  154. 154.

    Ladyraxterinok

    October 29, 2019 at 2:27 pm

    @clay:
    He and family left Ukraine when he and twin were 3 yrs old, I believe. Incredible long-term planning there!

  155. 155.

    Steve in the ATL

    October 29, 2019 at 2:27 pm

    @JR: it’s Drew Magary and a bunch of third tier sports pundits

    Steve rolling in the CHA in a convertible Mustang GT

  156. 156.

    catclub

    October 29, 2019 at 2:30 pm

    Michael Gerson! I have not kept up.

    By contrast, Gerson provides a different but still resonant warning:

    But we should not underestimate the cultural trauma that many leaders of the religious right have inflicted. It is in the order of things that a younger generation should challenge the views and values of its parents. It is a source of cynicism and social disruption when an older generation betrays civilizing values in full sight of its children. Many evangelical leaders now lie drunk, naked and exposed.

  157. 157.

    catclub

    October 29, 2019 at 2:32 pm

    @JR:

    the site is going into a VC-driven death spiral at this moment.

    Venture Capital? VietCong? Oh you mean how the site refreshes to last friday?

  158. 158.

    catclub

    October 29, 2019 at 2:37 pm

    @Elizabelle:

    And that kind of pessimism and cynicism is what makes me want to reduce my Balloon Juice habit

    I just thought I was being realistic and stating facts. – Obama had 18 months to fix everything. No pessimism or cynicism.

  159. 159.

    Jeffro

    October 29, 2019 at 2:39 pm

    @Mary G: they SHOULD be worried…trumpov still has over a year to go! A year! And they got shellacked in 2018 no matter how they try to spin it.

    No wonder we have so many Dems running and others thinking about getting in. 2020 is quite likely (knock on wood, I know, I know…) to be a blowout if trumpov’s still somehow holding on.

    A rational party would care about actually winning instead of kowtowing to a psycho. Even if they do the right thing for the wrong reasons, it’s still the right thing for them and the country. But…please proceed, GOP

  160. 160.

    J. Squid

    October 29, 2019 at 2:40 pm

    @catclub:

    It was accusing Jews who are Democrats of not being sufficiently loyal to the Likud version of Israel.

    IOW, Jews SHOULD be loyal to another country first and foremost. A distinction without a difference to be sure.

  161. 161.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    October 29, 2019 at 2:40 pm

    @catclub:

    If the Democrats cannot fix everything in 18 months, it is right back to the GOP being the hope of the nation.
    Happy to be wrong.

    Yup. Remember, IIRC two months before the 2010 midterms, St Stewart giving a woman “Medal of Reasonableness” to the woman who whined at Obama because he hand’t fixed everything yet? And all the tote-baggers who applauded because Stewart was their hip TeeVee friend?

  162. 162.

    zhena gogolia

    October 29, 2019 at 2:40 pm

    @Ladyraxterinok:

    Sleeper cell!

  163. 163.

    Jeffro

    October 29, 2019 at 2:41 pm

    @Kay: That’s awesome! Run, Gabbard, run! =)

  164. 164.

    Elizabelle

    October 29, 2019 at 2:43 pm

    @catclub: I was harsh, but did you notice that baud was making a lot of comments along those lines before he disappeared? He seemed thoroughly demoralized, and I thought he might have left this blog as a sanity break. Or permanently. This stuff can break your heart.

    Yes, Obama did have 18 months to fix everything. With Fox News and the rightwing media lying throughout. What is different is that we’ve all suffered through 1,000 plus days of Donald Trump, and the GOP does not get to reset that. We see how the Republican evangelicals went for him; welcomed him as the second coming of Christ. I suspect a lot more is going to come out about how rotten that party is, and how they have rotted the institutions that most Americans really don’t pay much attention to.

    I think the GOP and their media enablers are putting themselves in the position of the French aristocrats who fought societal change for too long and got swept away, brutally. Of course, they may be heading for enacting a dictatorship too. But what they’re doing is not as under the radar, any longer.

  165. 165.

    MattF

    October 29, 2019 at 2:45 pm

    @catclub: Gerson identifies as a WEP (White Evangelical Protestant), but only just:

    An extraordinary 99 percent of Republican WEPs oppose the impeachment and removal of the president — which probably puts me in the smallest political minority I have ever had the honor of occupying.

  166. 166.

    The Moar You Know

    October 29, 2019 at 2:46 pm

    When the cult leader dies, what happens then?

    @Yutsano: Another sociopath will find the GOP. And likely won’t be nearly as stupid or publicly objectionable as Trump.

    I do not understand why you think this HAS to end. It does not. Trump has given the GOP everything they’ve ever asked for. Why on earth would they want this to stop?

  167. 167.

    Mandalay

    October 29, 2019 at 2:46 pm

    @Kay:

    She is a Republican though- she’s much closer to that end than my end.

    She’s an odd mix to be sure, and I assume that she only ran as a Democrat in Hawaii because she couldn’t possibly win as a Republican.

    But for all Gabbard’s many failings, I admire her complete and open lack of fealty to Israel, while most other Democratic candidates still guzzle Israel’s cock, or stay quiet and hope they don’t get asked about their position. Of course that makes her dead meat as a Republican (and perfect as an independent?).

  168. 168.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    October 29, 2019 at 2:46 pm

    Matthew Gertz @ MattGertz
    In another CNN segment, Jeffrey Toobin refers to Duffy’s “insanity, and frankly anti-immigrant bigotry.”

  169. 169.

    catclub

    October 29, 2019 at 2:48 pm

    @Elizabelle: Thanks for the good words. Cheers.

  170. 170.

    Elizabelle

    October 29, 2019 at 2:49 pm

    @MattF: They’re not just sheeple under a steeple, they’re crazy ass lemmings.

    Most younger people see right through them, too.

  171. 171.

    Yutsano

    October 29, 2019 at 2:51 pm

    @J. Squid: I doth beggeth thine pardon?

  172. 172.

    catclub

    October 29, 2019 at 2:52 pm

    @MattF: Does anybody else remember Sydney Harris and “Majority of One”?

  173. 173.

    Yutsano

    October 29, 2019 at 2:52 pm

    Frakking work computer! Moderation request on aisle 12.

  174. 174.

    catclub

    October 29, 2019 at 2:55 pm

    @Mandalay:

    She’s an odd mix to be sure, and I assume that she only ran as a Democrat in Hawaii because she couldn’t possibly win as a Republican.

    I am amazed by this. How did the Democrats in Hawaii not notice? Are there any Democrats running in Mississippi as Republicans?

  175. 175.

    sdhays

    October 29, 2019 at 2:55 pm

    @Mandalay: Since she’s essentially pledging fealty to Russia, it’s not really a step up.

  176. 176.

    p.a.

    October 29, 2019 at 3:01 pm

    @Ladyraxterinok: Those devious Ukraine* (while still part of the Soviet Union) operatives!

    *They even got hold of Obama’s time-travel machine!

  177. 177.

    MattF

    October 29, 2019 at 3:06 pm

    @catclub: It used to happen, now and then, in the old days. Jacob Javits ran as a Republican in NY because he wouldn’t do fealty to the Dem organization in NY, and said so publicly. But ‘liberal Republican’ is an oxymoron nowadays. It wouldn’t surprise me if the same thing happened to ‘conservative Democrat’.

  178. 178.

    West of the Rockies

    October 29, 2019 at 3:08 pm

    @rikyrah:

    Well said. But I doubt any of the rat bastards want forgiveness. They’re too stupid and vile to know they should.

  179. 179.

    PJ

    October 29, 2019 at 3:08 pm

    @The Moar You Know: If the 2020 election brings a landslide, followed by many, many trials of the guilty, and the GOP, as a brand, becomes toxic due to Trump and the Republicans in Congress, their supporters will not disappear and will coalesce somewhere else. White supremacists aren’t going away, though they may become quieter, and the wealthy, abetted by the media, will seek to co-opt and at least moderate Democratic efforts at taxation and regulation. The hard part will still be in front of us.

  180. 180.

    Miss Bianca

    October 29, 2019 at 3:13 pm

    @JR: VC?

    Not a huge sports fan, but I think Deadspin has some damn fine writers.

  181. 181.

    stinger

    October 29, 2019 at 3:15 pm

    @(((CassandraLeo))): Apparently so. A third example of how you have to use certain words or it doesn’t count: If the [real] president doesn’t use the phrase “war on terror”, then he isn’t fighting for our freedoms.

    Of course, this argument is brought to you by the folks who can IGNORE the words “a well regulated Militia”.

  182. 182.

    Ladyraxterinok

    October 29, 2019 at 3:15 pm

    @Mary G:
    Read somewhere that as a result of Nazis saying they were obeying orders—US military branches all hav major rule that they are NEVER required to obey an illegal/ unjust command

  183. 183.

    Yutsano

    October 29, 2019 at 3:18 pm

    @Ladyraxterinok: I believe that rule pre-dates WWII. But this is definite Adam L. Silverman territory.

  184. 184.

    Captain C

    October 29, 2019 at 3:22 pm

    @Mai naem mobile:

    This is not the 1800s with an agricultural economy with high child mortality rates.

    Also, if this were the 1800s and kid number 9 or 10, mom and dad would likely be in their early to mid thirties, at most. Pushing 50 was when they might see their 9th or 10th grandchild.

  185. 185.

    Yutsano

    October 29, 2019 at 3:23 pm

    @J. Squid: Excusez moi?

  186. 186.

    Ladyraxterinok

    October 29, 2019 at 3:24 pm

    @J. Squid:
    IIRC in 19th century Germany it was frequently claimed that Jews in Germany could never be ‘real’ true patriotic Germans because they were first loyal to some international Jewish identity.

    There was also some odd claim that they couldn’t even speak correct German. Never understood rationale for that.

    It drove many so-called good Germans mad that Heinrich Heine, a Jew, was considered a major German author!

  187. 187.

    Omnes Omnibus

    October 29, 2019 at 3:24 pm

    @Elizabelle: I got told I was tone policing. I got told I was telling people what they could and couldn’t say. I got told that people need a place to voice their anxieties.
    This blog’s comment section is not a place to look for a positive take on the world. Some of it is despair. Some of it is cynicism. I have largely quit commenting.

  188. 188.

    clay

    October 29, 2019 at 3:26 pm

    @Ladyraxterinok: Just like when Obama’s mother faked that birth announcement in Hawaii, just so he could run for President decades later!

  189. 189.

    Litlebritdifrnt

    October 29, 2019 at 3:26 pm

    @Mai naem mobile: It was reported on our news the other day that a couple in Morecambe, Lancashire (next town over) are about to welcome their 22nd child. The Duggars are pikers compared to this couple.

  190. 190.

    Mandalay

    October 29, 2019 at 3:27 pm

    So Pelosi had the perfect response to this tweet from Trump this morning:

    How many more Never Trumpers will be allowed to testify about a perfectly appropriate phone call when all anyone has to do is READ THE TRANSCRIPT! I knew people were listening in on the call (why would I say something inappropriate?), which was fine with me, but why so many?

    Pelosi’s response:

    Everybody has read your words on the call. The Ukrainian President asks for military aid to fend off the Russian attack, you say “I want you to do us a favor though,” and then you spend the rest of the call asking for bogus investigations to smear your political opponents.

    Short, focused and brutal.

    What’s especially bad for Trump is that the Ukraine call is easy for the public to understand, and screaming “READ THE TRANSCRIPT!” in all caps isn’t going to help him in the slightest.

  191. 191.

    Ksmiami

    October 29, 2019 at 3:28 pm

    @Mary G: I want them smashed, burned, and the graves salted- Republicanism is a failed ancient regime for old white male privilege and needs to die

  192. 192.

    stinger

    October 29, 2019 at 3:30 pm

    @Elizabelle: Intentionally or not, you’ve made me think “Don of the Thousand Days”, which both gives me a laugh and serves as a reminder that it may not turn out so well for him! Only Trump is both Anne and the vain, bloated, entitled, and constantly enraged Henry VIII.

  193. 193.

    Steve in the ATL

    October 29, 2019 at 3:31 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus:

    I have largely quit commenting.

    At least there’s some upside to this.

    Zing!

    Steve rolling in his 5.0
    Top down so my hair can blow

  194. 194.

    Ladyraxterinok

    October 29, 2019 at 3:33 pm

    @Mai naem mobile:
    ‘Be fruitful and multiply,’ it’s in the Bible!!!

    See whole creepy quiverful movement. People against the movement have a blog No Longer Quivering on patheos

  195. 195.

    rikyrah

    October 29, 2019 at 3:37 pm

    we need a new thread..please

  196. 196.

    Roger Moore

    October 29, 2019 at 3:37 pm

    @Mary G:

    Axios says on Twitter that Republicans are quietly worried about losing the 2020 elections – President, Senate, and House – in a landslide. That’s what they deserve. A timeout of a decade or two, or the party going under completely.

    If the Democrats do win in a landslide and are as ruthless about gerrymandering as the Republicans were, it could indeed put the Republicans in a world of hurt for a good long time. I’m sure the Supreme Court would suddenly discover that gerrymandering was indeed unconstitutional and something the courts could intercede about, but just getting rid of all the election rigging the Republicans have been doing would do a lot to hurt them.

  197. 197.

    Ladyraxterinok

    October 29, 2019 at 3:38 pm

    @Mary G:
    Amen and amen and amen!

  198. 198.

    Leto

    October 29, 2019 at 3:41 pm

    @Mary G:

    the party going under completely

    I’m all for this. The current party is just batshit insane. If the “Never Trumpers” want to break off and try to salvage what they can, sure. We need a healthy 2 party system but until that time, the adults need to take charge and the piss-ant white men, with their enablers, can sit the fuck down and stfu for about 3-4 generations.

  199. 199.

    Gravenstone

    October 29, 2019 at 3:41 pm

    @Yutsano: I believe that comment ties back to an earlier statement that Trump attacked US Jews for having the temerity of not placing the interests of Likud (and by extension Netanyahu) first.

  200. 200.

    catclub

    October 29, 2019 at 3:42 pm

    @Mandalay:

    and screaming “READ THE TRANSCRIPT!” in all caps isn’t going to help him in the slightest.

    I would like to read an actual transcript. What they released is not one.

  201. 201.

    Elizabelle

    October 29, 2019 at 3:43 pm

    @rikyrah: Thank you. Yes we do! We’ve been abandoned.

  202. 202.

    dmsilev

    October 29, 2019 at 3:44 pm

    @Mandalay: It still boggles the mind that the geniuses at the White House thought releasing that memo/summary of the phone call was going to help their case.

  203. 203.

    Jeffro

    October 29, 2019 at 3:44 pm

    God help us, Lanny Davis and Anthony Scaramucci have a joint op-ed (and I mean ‘joint’ also in the sense that they must have been high) calling for impeachment…but then no trial unless at least 20 GOP Senators agree to ‘have an open mind’ about the evidence that is presented. Otherwise, no deal, just impeach him and leave it kinda sorta hanging there until the election, which they somehow seem to think will be fair and a guaranteed loss for trumpov.

    Say what?

    Why the eff would we let trumpublican senators off the hook like that? Much less trumpov himself?

    Gentlemen…the guy’s getting impeached because he is ALREADY VIOLATING THE LAW regarding the upcoming election. Why would we just give him the equivalent of a slap…no wait…not even a slap on the wrist?

    What kind of crazy-crap crappity crap is this?

    WaPo, can I haz my op-ed space now please? Just one? I will give you clicks beyond imagining. It’s going to be titled, “Hell HELL HELLLLLLLL no, we’re not going to stop short of following through on this constitutionally-designed process for removing a proven crook from the highest office in the land. HELLLLLLLLLL NO.” (I know the editors will want to tighten that up a bit but it really needs to stay ‘as is’)

    Davis and Scaramucci: impeach him but then that’s it, don’t put his Republican senate enablers in a bind!
    NOPE

  204. 204.

    Mandalay

    October 29, 2019 at 3:45 pm

    @MattF:

    Republican talking points about Vindman’s supposed dual loyalties have gotten to CNN via Sean Duffy, a new CNN talking head.

    After getting some serious blowback for that stunt, Duffy has reconsidered, and tweeted this:

    Lt. Col. Vindman is an American war hero. As I said clearly this morning on air “I salute Mr. Vindman’s service.” My point is that Mr. Vindman is an unelected advisor, he gives ADVICE. President Trump sets the policy.

    So he tried to flip flop, but he’s getting eviscerated in that twitter thread. Too bad, so sad.

  205. 205.

    PPCLI

    October 29, 2019 at 3:45 pm

    @catclub: This can’t be repeated enough: Given how bad the document they did release is, the actual record of the call is sure to be 100 times worse.

  206. 206.

    Elizabelle

    October 29, 2019 at 3:46 pm

    @Roger Moore: I am good with packing the Supreme Court, and then instituting the plan that USSC terms last 18 years, and justices are replaced on a rotating basis.

    Cannot ever allow a criminal senator like Mitch McConnell to steal another Supreme Court seat.

    If it can ever be proven that Trump cheated and was not honestly elected, I think Gorsuch and Kavanaugh need to come off the Court, and all judges rammed through need to come up for a fresh vote.

  207. 207.

    janesays

    October 29, 2019 at 3:46 pm

    @Karen Weisz: Yes, he was on The Real World, as was his wife Rachel Campos. I was a freshman in college when she was on and remember her being the recently graduated college Republican in the house (notable because that season was shot in San Francisco) who nonetheless became close with Pedro Zamora, the gay activist with AIDS, though she initially kept her distance from him because of her idiotic misconceptions about the contagiousness of HIV, no doubt informed by her rightwing 1980s Catholic upbringing. She also hooked up with that douchebag Puck on the show (it was a few years before she ever met her husband). God, it’s depressing that I remember actually watching that show, though I was just a recent high school grad at the time and we didn’t quite have the internet yet.

  208. 208.

    Elizabelle

    October 29, 2019 at 3:47 pm

    @stinger: Yes. I think of Anne Boleyn. And JFK.

  209. 209.

    Ladyraxterinok

    October 29, 2019 at 3:49 pm

    @Kay:
    How can anyone make such statements when today everyone in the world can watch and read what is going on in real time. It’s like their ‘brain’ is stuck in the 70s , and they believe the rest of the world is there too.

  210. 210.

    Jeffro

    October 29, 2019 at 3:49 pm

    @Jeffro: It’s basically, “if many of the jurors (ie, the Republicans in the Senate) won’t fulfill their oaths to support and defend the Constitution because they are brainless, spineless dictator-loving weasels…we couldn’t possibly make them vote on trumpov’s guilt or innocence and be held accountable for that vote”

    Screw that. Let them say in advance that they’re going to vote to acquit no matter what. Let them actually go ahead and vote that way. But…to abort the whole process when it gets to the Senate, just because the ‘jury pool’ is ‘self-tainted’ and won’t uphold their oaths?

  211. 211.

    MattF

    October 29, 2019 at 3:50 pm

    @Jeffro: Not the Onion!

  212. 212.

    Jeffro

    October 29, 2019 at 3:51 pm

    @Elizabelle: Agree in full. Pack SCOTUS and any other court (if that’s possible) to balance out the unqualified whack jobs that have been appointed by an illegitimate president* installed by a hostile foreign power’s attack on our country.

  213. 213.

    Elizabelle

    October 29, 2019 at 3:52 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus: I think a lot of people have quit commenting as much.

    Do you love wallowing in despair and hearing that we’re going to lose all the time, or always in the end, no matter what, because the Republicans are so powerful? I do not. Further, I think that is idiocy, and we suffer through enough day to day under this illegitimate regime.

    I am pleasantly surprised the worm has turned and that the both sides pundits have been called out. Not enough, but it is happening.

  214. 214.

    Barbara

    October 29, 2019 at 3:53 pm

    @janesays: This is what I totally missed because I had toddlers and a full time job at the same time.

  215. 215.

    Jeffro

    October 29, 2019 at 3:54 pm

    @MattF: Even the Onion has standards, concern for its’ readers’ blood pressure, etc.

    “He’s guilty, Guilty, GUILTY…but you know…unless the ‘jury pool’ – the ones that swore an oath to the Constitution – can find it in their hearts to publicly declare they’ll be open-minded, we should just let it go. We’d rather see him lose bigly at the ballot box.”

    F THAT

  216. 216.

    Dorothy A. Winsor

    October 29, 2019 at 3:56 pm

    The Ds are out with their impeachment procedures. Here’s a fact sheet. Among other things, it allows staff counsels to do the questioning.

  217. 217.

    janesays

    October 29, 2019 at 3:56 pm

    @Elizabelle:

    I am good with packing the Supreme Court, and then instituting the plan that USSC terms last 18 years, and justices are replaced on a rotating basis.

    The first thing will be extremely difficult to accomplish (because it would require elimination of the filibuster, and I’m neither convinced that Schumer is willing to do that, nor am I convinced they have the votes in the caucus to replace him as Majority Leader), and the second thing is all but impossible to accomplish (because it would require an amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which may never happen again in our lifetimes given the national polarization). I’d love to see both of those things happen, but I’m not holding my breath.

  218. 218.

    Dorothy A. Winsor

    October 29, 2019 at 3:57 pm

    And here’s the 8 page resolution.

  219. 219.

    Elizabelle

    October 29, 2019 at 3:57 pm

    @janesays: We have to try.

  220. 220.

    Barbara

    October 29, 2019 at 4:00 pm

    @janesays: It would be easier to add members or require rotating panels, making it like a “super appellate” but not quite a Supreme Court. Right now, in the federal court system, judges can take senior status after age 65 but no later than age 70. They keep working just as they always did, but a new judge is also appointed. Or you could just increase the number of justices, which has not always been 9. There is no reason that 9 people should hold such power. Fifteen would work just as well.

  221. 221.

    dww44

    October 29, 2019 at 4:00 pm

    @Jeffro: From somewhere living in Trumplandia and whose elected representatives are wholly in the Trump tank, I honestly thing they’ve lost the ability to think for themselves and/or so committed to their partisan view that they are now constitutionally unable to not support Trump. David Perdue was front and center with Trump at the Nats game 2 nights ago.

    I subscribe to the view that we have to wipe them out in 2020. Only problem here is that the GOP is spending $150 million tax dollars on new voting machines with no paper trail (only a paper record) and the AJC just announced that the new SofS has announced a purge of 360, 000 voters to take place sometime soon. So, for those of us in a red state, suppression is very much front and center.

  222. 222.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    October 29, 2019 at 4:01 pm

    @janesays:

    The first thing will be extremely difficult to accomplish (because it would require elimination of the filibuster, and I’m neither convinced that Schumer is willing to do that, nor am I convinced they have the votes in the caucus to replace him as Majority Leader)

    all of which assumes winning the Senate majority, which is a heavy lift, and under the best-case scenarios that majority includes Sinema, Manchin, Kelly, Carper, Coons, Hickenlooper, Bennet, Jones, and Angus King, who might (I don’t really know) might be a question mark. Hell, Feinstein?

    ETA: all of which is to say: Can we focus on wining the fucking White House and Senate before we start creating new purity tests and counting chickens unto the seventh generation?

  223. 223.

    Citizen Alan

    October 29, 2019 at 4:01 pm

    @catclub:

    Yes, actually. William Waller is the son of Democratic Governor Bill Waller (the man who among other things shut down the Mississippi Sovereignty Commission), and just a few months ago, he forced Tate Reeves (current Lt. Gov. and Trump toady) into a run-off in the GOP Gubernatorial primary in which he lost but performed respectably, IMO. Had he become governor, I imagine Waller would have conducted himself as any Blue Dog Dem Governor, and he’d probably be to the left of the actual Dem nominee, Jim Hood, on some issues.

  224. 224.

    Elizabelle

    October 29, 2019 at 4:05 pm

    New thread up. TaMara’s got a Snow Day/Open thread post.

    @Barbara: Those are good suggestions, too. The current situation is what is untenable. And it is ridiculous to have a cretin who lost the popular vote by 3 million choosing 2 new Supreme Court justices, and dog hopes not one further.

    When said USSC justices may sit in judgement of questions surrounding his impeachment. I think Gorsuch and Kavanaugh should both be forced to recuse. They are beholden to Trump and utter partisans.

    And I still await the morning we wake up and find out more about former Supreme Kennedy and his Deutsche Banking son. Would be lovely to see them in criminal peril/perp walk/jail.

  225. 225.

    PJ

    October 29, 2019 at 4:14 pm

    @Elizabelle:

    And I still await the morning we wake up and find out more about former Supreme Kennedy and his Deutsche Banking son. Would be lovely to see them in criminal peril/perp walk/jail.

    From your lips to the FSM’s many tentacles

  226. 226.

    oatler.

    October 29, 2019 at 4:19 pm

    @janesays: Chuck Klosterman wrote a scholarly thesis he called The Puck Factor in his “Sex Drugs and Cocoa Puffs” collection.

  227. 227.

    The Moar You Know

    October 29, 2019 at 4:19 pm

    What’s especially bad for Trump is that the Ukraine call is easy for the public to understand, and screaming “READ THE TRANSCRIPT!” in all caps isn’t going to help him in the slightest.

    @Mandalay: His voters, including the mass of college-educated ones, are not the “read the details” type.

  228. 228.

    ?BillinGlendaleCA

    October 29, 2019 at 4:27 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus: I too often tire of the “Woe is me” vibe.

  229. 229.

    Mr. Mack

    October 29, 2019 at 4:30 pm

    Nicolle Wallace just called Ingraham and Yoo “chicken-shit.” On live TV. Made my day.

  230. 230.

    ?BillinGlendaleCA

    October 29, 2019 at 4:31 pm

    @Steve in the ATL:

    Top down so my hair can blow

    You have hair?

  231. 231.

    Steve in the ATL

    October 29, 2019 at 4:39 pm

    @?BillinGlendaleCA: I do! Though it’s mostly gray now. Damn kids. You can ask the many jackals who weren’t “rearranging their sock drawers” when I was in town.

  232. 232.

    catclub

    October 29, 2019 at 4:41 pm

    @Jeffro: I think you may have misunderstood what their intent was. I will tell my interpretation.
    If there are NOT 20 GOP senators who will approach the evidence with an open mind, the trial in the Senate will be a show trial with a foregone conclusion – Trump IS INNOCENT OF ALL CHARGES. That may not be the best result for quashing his re-election hopes.

    But if you have gone into that trial and KNOW that not even 20 GOP senators will give the evidence a fair hearing, it will be viewed differently.

    Maybe that show trial that ends in Trump IS INNOCENT OF ALL CHARGES. will still be bad for Trump, but i can see how this might put some GOP senators in a box.

    On the third hand, they have come up with a ploy to put GOP senators in a box – either refuse to say you will give the evidence a fair hearing,
    or risk a primary for saying you WILL give it a fair hearing.
    Unfortunately, I would expect the senators will dodge this ploy. And it will not have any impact.

    Fourthly, is this already assuming how all Democrats will vote? Before any evidence has been presented? That seems a bit … presumptuous.
    Perhaps the idea is too cunning by half.

  233. 233.

    ...now I try to be amused

    October 29, 2019 at 4:59 pm

    @catclub:

    Support the troops… bring them home! has never quite caught on.

    Use a slogan Kerry could have used in 2004:

    “Support the troops… elect them a better commander-in-chief.”

  234. 234.

    sgrAstar

    October 29, 2019 at 5:26 pm

    @low-tech cyclist: Berkeley should certainly kick Yoo the fuck out. I’m a pretty big donor and I’m trying to raise the roof about his truly despicable behavior. He also advised the trump administration on how to roll back PBO’s National Monument designations for Bear’s Ears and GrandStaircase/Escalante. Rotting in hell is too good for that tool.
    ?

  235. 235.

    Uncle Cosmo

    October 29, 2019 at 5:30 pm

    @Elizabelle:

    I am good with packing the Supreme Court –

    So am I. The Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937 looks like a good start. Only 4 of the current Justices will be older than 70 years 6 months as of 20 January 2021 (Thomas, RBG, Breyer, Alito) but that ought to suffice.

    – and then instituting the plan that USSC terms last 18 years, and justices are replaced on a rotating basis.

    Which would require amending the Constitution. Good luck with that.

  236. 236.

    Elizabelle

    October 29, 2019 at 5:33 pm

    @Uncle Cosmo: Well, we will start with the packing …

  237. 237.

    Uncle Cosmo

    October 29, 2019 at 6:09 pm

    @Uncle Cosmo: It saddens me to see how many great (or at least interesting) ideas on how the government ought to be reformed or reformulated get tossed out here without any serious exploration of how hard it would be politically to put those ideas into place.

    It seems that among all the clever, entertaining and (not infrequently) informative Jackals, no one here can speak with authority out of a truly broad understanding of the American system of government and its possibilities and limitations. At best we have a very few talented semi-pros with experience limited to their localities and/or specific areas of expertise (e.g., Adam, Cheryl, David) in the midst of a horde of political naifs and neophytes.

    (In some ways it reminds me of an NFL team fan site I also frequent, swarmed by casual fans posting “Sign this guy!” or “Cut that clown!” or “Run this play!” or “Fire that coach!”, as if they knew better than anyone else what the team should do. At the end of the day most of us will credit that team officials know a lot more than we do, are [more or less] competent & want to do what’s best for the team & its followers. I wish I had as much faith in our overall confidence in our party leaders, outside of [maybe] Speaker Pelosi, may the hammer stay in her hands…)

  238. 238.

    jimmiraybob

    October 29, 2019 at 7:12 pm

    @(((CassandraLeo))):

    Yes, they may want to burn it all down but they all still want whatever’s left to be ruled by Dear leader. I hereby retract “anarcho” from the coalition and am inserting Galtist.

  239. 239.

    J. Squid

    October 29, 2019 at 9:30 pm

    @Yutsano:

    Pardon? Nah. I’m just bloviating my opinion of how the two things are the same thing. Because it sure seems like the same thing to me.

  240. 240.

    (((CassandraLeo)))

    October 29, 2019 at 9:37 pm

    @jimmiraybob: Galtist is 100% appropriate and I hereby co-sign this amendment. (Ayn Rand sure wrote a lot of pernicious crap, didn’t she?)

    Ceterum censeo factionem Republicanam esse delendam.

  241. 241.

    Vet

    November 25, 2019 at 10:15 am

    @jonas: Good knowledge. They cried hero until some believed. Then Ollie shows up at the NRA then gets outed from them. It’s like Hillery using her impeached husband as a character reference in her campaign.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - Winter Wren - Snowy Trails in Carlisle 9
Photo by Winter Wren (3/8/26)

We Met Our Goal for Alaska!

Election Resources

Voter Registration Info – Find a State
Check Voter Registration by Address

Recent Comments

  • Anyway on Sunday Morning Open Thread (Mar 8, 2026 @ 1:22pm)
  • bbleh on Happy International Women’s Day! (Mar 8, 2026 @ 1:17pm)
  • Baud on Happy International Women’s Day! (Mar 8, 2026 @ 1:15pm)
  • Baud on Happy International Women’s Day! (Mar 8, 2026 @ 1:13pm)
  • H.E.Wolf on Happy International Women’s Day! (Mar 8, 2026 @ 1:12pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
On Artificial Intelligence (7-part series)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Outsmarting Apple iOS 26

Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Order Calendar A
Order Calendar B

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix
Rose Judson (podcast)

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Privacy Manager

Copyright © 2026 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!