• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

They were going to turn on one another at some point. It was inevitable.

Let’s not be the monsters we hate.

Republicans don’t want a speaker to lead them; they want a hostage.

Live so that if you miss a day of work people aren’t hoping you’re dead.

When I decide to be condescending, you won’t have to dream up a fantasy about it.

The media handbook says “controversial” is the most negative description that can be used for a Republican.

Democracy cannot function without a free press.

Of course you can have champagne before noon. That’s why orange juice was invented.

It’s pointless to bring up problems that can only be solved with a time machine.

You would normally have to try pretty hard to self-incriminate this badly.

Just because you believe it, that does not make it true.

The current Supreme Court is a dangerous, rogue court.

Conservatism: there are people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

People identifying as christian while ignoring christ and his teachings is a strange thing indeed.

There are consequences to being an arrogant, sullen prick.

if you can’t see it, then you are useless in the fight to stop it.

“Facilitate” is an active verb, not a weasel word.

Impressively dumb. Congratulations.

Disappointing to see gov. newsom with his finger to the wind.

Seems like a complicated subject, have you tried yelling at it?

“But what about the lurkers?”

“The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits.”

Too little, too late, ftfnyt. fuck all the way off.

Petty moves from a petty man.

Mobile Menu

  • 2026 Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2026 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
'What the kids did do, was absolutely wreck the Trump campaigns voter tracking and ID system'

Impeachment Inquiry

You are here: Home / Archives for Politics / Impeachment Inquiry

Wednesday Morning Open Thread: The GOP Insists There Will Be Blood Impeachment

by Anne Laurie|  April 17, 20249:15 am| 213 Comments

This post is in: Impeachment Hearings, Open Threads, Republican Stupidity, Republican Venality

#ProudBlue #ResistanceUnited 🎁
House Republicans walked impeachment papers to the senate today for Secretary Mayorkas. It won’t pass the Senate.We need adults in the House instead of a bunch of Magats who are just dicking around. #PutinsPuppets https://t.co/62reFxAES4

— Sheryl with an S 🟦🟧🇺🇸🌊 (@beachblond52) April 16, 2024

Per the “Senior Congressional Correspondent for Fox News”, as of this morning:
Wednesday Morning Open Thread 6
Wednesday Morning Open Thread 7

The Washington Post, yesterday — “Mayorkas impeachment moves to Senate, where trial could end fast”:

… Led by 11 impeachment managers appointed by Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), House Republicans have demanded a full trial, while Senate Democrats, who hold a 51-49 majority, are planning to band together to dismiss or table the trial. Most Senate Republicans, despite previously voicing concerns about the substance of the two articles of impeachment against Mayorkas, have echoed the lower chamber’s calls for the Senate to adhere to precedent and hold a trial.

At least one Republican — Sen. Mitt Romney (Utah) — said last week that he planned to vote against a full trial. On Tuesday, Romney softened his position, telling reporters that he at least wanted debate on the articles before moving to dismiss them and therefore did not support tabling the charges. Several others who have been critical of the impeachment have yet to stake out their position, including GOP Sens. Susan Collins (Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska). Collins, citing her role as a juror in the trial, declined to weigh in on how she will vote, and Murkowski vaguely said she wanted “process.”…

show full post on front page

After House Republicans made the ceremonial walk across the Capitol to present the articles charging Mayorkas with “willful and systemic refusal to comply with the law” and “breach of public trust,” Rep. Mark Green (R-Tenn.), chairman of the Committee on Homeland Security, read them aloud on the Senate floor. Senators will be sworn in as jurors Wednesday, and then it will be incumbent on Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) to decide how to proceed.

Schumer decried the proceedings Monday, saying impeachment “should never be used to settle a policy disagreement” and vowing to “address the issue as expeditiously as possible.” It’s unclear whether Schumer will move to table or dismiss the case, a maneuver that requires 51 votes to pass…

Senate Republicans have been divided on how to best influence the process from their relatively powerless position in the minority; some have agitated for an opportunity to hold Democrats accountable for the record-breaking levels of migration at the southern U.S. border. Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) said the Senate GOP conference had yet to come to an agreement on an approach to process the articles, but one of the options under discussion is extracting an agreement from Democrats to ensure Republicans time to debate.

“I think right now there’s still a question about how it’ll get handled, and that’s something that our members are going to have to have a conversation about today, and then hopefully we’ll have a better insight into what that process might look like,” Thune said…

Mayorkas, meanwhile, has been making the rounds on Capitol Hill over the past week, advocating for a DHS budget with higher funding than in the deal agreed to last month by the White House and Congress.

This is Mayorkas’s 30th time testifying before Congress in his capacity as DHS secretary, although he did not testify in his defense before the House Committee on Homeland Security after it revoked an invitation for him to appear, instead requesting written testimony.

“Secretary Mayorkas spent months helping a bipartisan group of Senators craft a tough but fair bill that would give DHS the tools necessary to meet today’s border security challenges, but the same House Republicans playing political games with this impeachment chose to block that bipartisan compromise,” a DHS spokesperson said in a statement. “Congressional Republicans should stop wasting time with unfounded attacks, and instead do their job by passing bipartisan legislation to properly fund the Department’s vital national security missions and finally fix our broken immigration system.”

Former Republican Congressman David Jolly on the Mayorkas impeachment:

“This is really a violation of the sanctity of the House. They’re now using their powers for this very political, unwarranted move and tool. It is sad to see how unserious it is under the Republican majority” pic.twitter.com/H7WU2OJknO

— Ian Sams (@IanSams46) April 16, 2024

Correct. The Speaker of the House next Congress will be Hakeem Jeffries https://t.co/I99i2tDZU8

— Aaron Fritschner (@Fritschner) April 15, 2024

Wednesday Morning Open Thread: The GOP Insists There Will Be <del>Blood</del> ImpeachmentPost + Comments (213)

Thursday Morning Open Thread: Too Many GOP Klowns in Our National Circus

by Anne Laurie|  March 21, 20248:31 am| 239 Comments

This post is in: Excellent Links, Impeachment Hearings, Proud to Be A Democrat, Republican Venality

Lawful Evil
Neutral Evil
Chaotic Evil pic.twitter.com/nhg7zp2min

— American Imperialism Kaiju Returns (@TonyMoonbeam) March 20, 2024

Obama, Pelosi join Biden to mobilize voters ahead of Affordable Care Act anniversary

https://t.co/rtpJJnmem7

— Mike Walker (@New_Narrative) March 20, 2024

Democrats work for people; Repubs work for a tiny cabal of oligarchs, domestic & foreign.

Once again, Trump is threatening 140 million American patients with ACA repeal because he says “ObamaCare sucks” — but we know the ACA cures!

That’s why we must reelect @JoeBiden and a Democratic House and Senate to answer the cry of patients across America — #SaveMyHealthCare! pic.twitter.com/uebmjGrtsC

— Nancy Pelosi (@TeamPelosi) March 20, 2024

NEW: Republicans call for raising the Social Security retirement age in clash with Biden, via @jackfitzdc https://t.co/8Vjvf4xD50

— Steven Dennis (@StevenTDennis) March 20, 2024

show full post on front page

Remember — sharing is caring!

Leader Schumer: The choice for Speaker Johnson is clear. Put the supplemental on the floor of the House for a vote and help deliver Ukraine the aid it desperately needs or kowtow to Donald Trump and the MAGA hard right who seem to want a victorious Putin. pic.twitter.com/ImXrJtxR4g

— House Judiciary Dems (@HouseJudiciary) March 20, 2024

Thursday Morning Open Thread: Too Many GOP Klowns in Our National Circus

Concerning yesterday’s center-ring saga:

Lacking support and evidence, the GOP-led impeachment inquiry against Biden continued to sputter out, even as House Republicans held a hearing featuring witnesses reiterating thin allegations that his family capitalized financially on their father’s name. https://t.co/wrAKWCH5dy

— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) March 21, 2024


Per the Washington Post, “Impeachment inquiry appears on ice as House GOP tries to wrangle support” [gift link]:

Lacking support and evidence, the GOP-led impeachment inquiry against President Biden continued to sputter out, even as House Republicans on Wednesday held a hearing that featured witnesses who reiterated thin allegations that members of the Biden family capitalized financially on their father’s name…

With a threadbare majority, House Republicans need near unanimity to approve articles of impeachment against the president, which they do not have. Instead, skepticism among rank-and-file Republicans has only grown since an FBI informant was charged with lying about the Bidens, an implosion of what had been presented as a major piece of evidence.

In the absence of those votes, Comer and other members of the investigating committees have pivoted to the possibility of criminal referrals. Comer has threatened to make “multiple” criminal referrals, but it remains unclear whether lawmakers will formally accuse President Biden of a crime and what crimes they allege may have been committed.

“I’m not sure how we would have a criminal referral of the president yet not move forward with impeachment,” Rep. Kelly Armstrong (R-N.D.) said. “I mean the [Justice Department] is never going to take that up anyway.”…

The apparent collapse of one of the House GOP’s marquee investigations was preceded by a string of incidents where Comer, who has been criticized by even some Republican colleagues for his Fox News-centric approach to the investigation, elevated allegations against Biden and his son before they publicly fizzled. Rep. Jamie Raskin (Md.), the ranking Democrat on the Oversight Committee, in his opening statement Wednesday called the hearing “the end of perhaps the most spectacular failure in the history of congressional investigations.”

“Our colleagues now are apparently preparing to save face by ending the impeachment farce with criminal referrals,” Raskin said. “But criminal referrals require evidence of crimes. And the only crimes we have seen are those of the GOP’s own star witnesses.”…

Some members indicated that they were open to weighing any new evidence House investigators may unearth in the meantime, but Rep. Mike Garcia (R-Calif.) noted that Republicans were running out of time before the rematch between Biden and former president Donald Trump — and that Biden faces bigger electoral challenges than a potential impeachment that is destined to fail in a Democratic-controlled Senate.

“Ultimately the American people will be voting in October or November to decide whether or not this president is suitable for office,” Garcia said. “I think he’s got enough other challenges and failures under his belt that the impeachment probably wouldn’t even affect the outcome of the election.”…

“The only information ever pushed on the Bidens and Ukraine has come from one source and one source only: Russia and Russian agents,” Parnas testified.

At the end of the hearing, Comer said he was inviting the president to testify to Congress, an invitation a White House spokesperson laughed off on social media.

Thursday Morning Open Thread: Too Many GOP Klowns in Our National CircusPost + Comments (239)

GOP Venality / Stupidity Open Thread: The Hunter Investigation Squad Found A Kindred Spirit

by Anne Laurie|  March 3, 20248:42 am| 291 Comments

This post is in: Excellent Links, Impeachment Inquiry, Republican Stupidity, Republican Venality

If the bank records prove anything then indict him. Otherwise and this bullshit charade.

Because that’s all you have?

— Gary Koepnick (@garykoepnick) March 2, 2024


If you can bring yourself to listen to 30 seconds of Jim Comer… dude is frantic that all the spinning plates are come crashing down, some of them possibly on his own head. We had full faith in Informant Smirnov, because he told us exactly what we wanted to hear!

How clean is the dirt on Hunter Biden? A key Republican source is charged with lying to the FBI https://t.co/gaX0zCipGj

— The Associated Press (@AP) March 2, 2024

Smirnov seems to be what Georgette Heyer would have styled ‘a plausible rogue’ — plausible only to those looking to believe. From the Associated Press, “How clean is the dirt on Hunter Biden? A key Republican source is charged with lying to the FBI”:

Alexander Smirnov was cast by Republicans as one of the FBI’s most trusted informants, offering a “highly credible” account of brazen public corruption by Joe Biden that formed a pillar of the House impeachment investigation of the Democratic president.

Then, last month, the script changed dramatically.

Smirnov, 43, finds himself charged with lying to the FBI, accused of fabricating a tale of bribery and espionage involving then-Vice President Biden and the Ukrainian energy company Burisma, and he has told officials he has Russian intelligence contacts…

Interviews and a review of public records by The Associated Press suggest this was not likely Smirnov’s first turn in what the government says is a cycle as a fabulist.

They offer a portrait of a businessman who operated a string of murky shell companies, ran with others who have been accused of fraud, and boasted of his own ties to the FBI. The episode highlights not only the perils of the Republicans’ reliance on unverified information in their quest to confront Biden but also the risks inherent in the FBI’s use of sometimes-unreliable informants who may have ulterior motives.

“How come in all of the universe nobody in America figured out for years that this guy is a fraud and a liar? How did this (expletive) make its way to Congress?” said Yossi Attia, a Los Angeles businessman who has interacted with Smirnov and once ran a penny stock company in which Smirnov held a substantial stake.…

show full post on front page

Little is known publicly about Smirnov other than allegations in the government’s case, court records, corporate financial disclosures and business filings.

A dual Israeli and U.S. citizen, Smirnov moved to the United States in 2006, traveling in Los Angeles’ Eastern European expatriate circles for more than a decade while providing information to the FBI. It wasn’t immediately clear what investigations Smirnov may have contributed to, though he worked with an FBI handler based in Seattle and the indictment suggests he provided reporting related to “ROC” — a likely reference to Russian organized crime.

A short biography included in a corporate financial document from 2011 describes Smirnov as a veteran businessman “fluent in Russian, English, Hebrew and Arabic” who once was president of a “private mineral and logistic operation, with assets in Russia.”

Even as Smirnov was being paid as a government informant, he participated in duplicitous business schemes, according to court records and interviews…

In 2016, Tigran Sarkisyan and Hripsime Khachtryan sued Smirnov, claiming he pitched them on a company called Grand Pacaraima Gold Corp. It was only after paying him $100,000 that the two discovered the stock certificates Smirnov provided were fake, according to the complaint. When they approached him about it, Smirnov told them he was working with authorities on a fraud investigation that did not involve them and he “continued to make excuses and lie” about their investment, the complaint said.

The suit was dismissed in 2018 when Sarkisyan and Khachatryan failed to show up for a court date because they were incarcerated. The two been sentenced to prison for racketeering weeks earlier in a far-reaching case against dozens of defendants that included allegations of fraud, money laundering and murder-for-hire, court records show.

Another acquaintance, Dmitry Fomichev, sued Smirnov in 2013, claiming Smirnov failed to repay a $500,000 loan. Court records state Smirnov boasted of his connections with the FBI and said he could help Fomichev “resolve certain matters then being investigated by several agencies of the federal government” in exchange for the loan.

Several months later, Fomichev was indicted on tax and immigration charges and sentenced to probation. A Los Angeles judge ruled in Fomichev’s favor in the civil case, though, issuing a nearly $600,000 judgement against Smirnov…

Prosecutors also have emphasized Smirnov’s preoccupation with keeping his accumulated wealth out of his own name, noting how he would withdraw large sums and use it to purchase cashier’s checks to give to his longtime girlfriend. After moving to Las Vegas in 2022, he gave her money to purchase a $1 million condo just off Elvis Presley Boulevard that is owned under her name, records show.

Smirnov told his FBI handler in 2017 that the Biden family name surfaced during a business call he had with a representative for Burisma, where Biden’s son Hunter served on the company’s board.

But after Donald Trump and his allies, including Rudy Giuliani, acting as a Trump lawyer, began to peddle unsupported corruption claims involving the Bidens and Ukraine before the 2020 presidential election, Smirnov’s story grew more elaborate…

All this money floating around, and a cadre of variously dim-witted and dishonest Repub ‘business experts’ just begging to be lied to! Could any self-respecting con artist resist such temptation, even given the odds against success over the long term?

Drawn in 30 seconds #Smirnov #Republicans #liars #Russia #Vodka #Cartoon #Timelapse #DrawnIn30Seconds pic.twitter.com/lKKscoHVEK

— Clay Jones (@claytoonz) February 23, 2024

GOP Venality / Stupidity Open Thread: The Hunter Investigation Squad Found A Kindred SpiritPost + Comments (291)

Saturday Morning Repub Cartoon Villains Open Thread

by Anne Laurie|  March 2, 20246:25 am| 217 Comments

This post is in: Impeachment Inquiry, Proud to Be A Democrat, Republican Venality

Here's how Hunter Biden rebutted the allegations that his father was involved in his business, in his own words.
No paywall, so even members of Congress have no excuse not to read it. https://t.co/R5gr4wcg32

— Philip Bump (@pbump) March 1, 2024

Philip Block, at the Washington Post, gives us all another free chance to catch up on the D-R-A-M-A — “Hunter Biden’s point-by-point rebuttal of allegations against his father”:

It has been abundantly clear for months that the House Republican case suggesting that President Biden was corruptly involved in his son Hunter’s business engagements was a function of frenzied cherry-picking. When Hunter Biden came to Capitol Hill on Wednesday to answer questions from legislators and investigators working on the impeachment inquiry targeting his father, he was presented with a number of those assertions.

In each case, he offered credible responses. You can read them below, in his own words.

What emerges when reading the transcript of the interview is how dependent the Republican effort is on three tactics. You’ll see those play out in the rebuttals Hunter Biden offered, but it’s useful to articulate them specifically.

First and most obvious is that cherry-picking. Republicans have gained access to countless financial and personal documents involving the Bidens and business associates of Hunter Biden and James Biden, the president’s brother. Sifting through that material like amateur internet sleuths, they’ve picked out a dozen or so things that might be framed as suspicious. This is how all investigations work, of course, with a few clues scattered among a lot of distractions. But when the allegations include such things as Joe Biden showing up at a dinner involving his son and a business partner, the frequency of his joining his son for dinner matters.

This is the second point: Republicans are trying to weaponize the schmoozing that politicians do. The allegations of Joe Biden meeting Hunter Biden’s partners centers on things like shaking hands at a reception or Hunter Biden’s associates being invited to White House events.

Third, the allegations center on two key conflations. The first and better known is using “the Biden family” as a proxy for “Hunter and James Biden.” Claiming that Hunter Biden’s income was going to “the Biden family” is a way to loop in the president unfairly. The same thing happens with “payments.”…

There were other issues presented to Hunter Biden, but those didn’t centrally allege wrongdoing by his father. This was the intent of the hearing after all — and as Biden and his attorney had to remind Republicans at times — not to tear down Hunter Biden but to show how Joe Biden allegedly benefited from these business deals.

Now more than ever, there’s no evidence he did.

If you read the whole thing, it’s obvious how frantically the GOP is scrabbling around, digging through the bottom of the barrel and deep into the Russian-fostered swamp muck, looking for a Magic Weapon that simply doesn’t exist.

show full post on front page

Hunter Biden is smarter than the House Republicans and not afraid to tell them that to their faces and I am here for it pic.twitter.com/YplYaPCfua

— John Cole (@Johngcole) March 1, 2024

Almost as if this entire thing has been a massive charade to drive down Joe Biden's approval rating by making false accusations against his son based on the musings of someone who is a Russian asset that the media treated as a credible source. ?? https://t.co/rwlRm9Ddcc

— scary lawyerguy (@scarylawyerguy) March 1, 2024

Epic Troll by Eric Swalwell to James Comer.

‘Excuse Me, What Did You Say?’ Eric Swalwell Asked James Comer If He’d Release Hunter Biden Transcript ‘In English or Russian’https://t.co/Y7qyzVufQq pic.twitter.com/Ug44yFFZh6

— James Tate (@JamesTate121) March 1, 2024

Put less polite, there is a "disconnect" here because they are lying. https://t.co/4V7b6hepQT

— Matthew Yglesias (@mattyglesias) March 1, 2024

The Hunter Biden transcript: 5 takeaways @thehill
– GOP failed to score knockout punch
– Biden family tragedy casts shadows over testimony
– Hunter Biden’s addiction runs through testimony
– Jared Kushner gets surprise focus
– What’s next? A public hearinghttps://t.co/Mpt7VQU1gf

— Mychael Schnell (@mychaelschnell) March 1, 2024

With Hunter Biden’s deposition in the rearview mirror, Republicans are looking to bring his testimony to television screens across the U.S.

Oversight and Accountability Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) said the “next phase” in the impeachment inquiry is a public hearing with Hunter Biden, where he hopes to “clear up some discrepancies between some of the statements [that] were made between some of the associates and what we heard today.”

HEY THE REASON I KEEP TALKING ABOUT THIS AND DOING ALL CAPS IS THAT THIS COULD SWING THE ELECTION https://t.co/yjQsPgHo5C

— Brian Schatz (@brianschatz) March 1, 2024

Saturday Morning Repub Cartoon Villains Open ThreadPost + Comments (217)

Open Thread: Hunter Biden Is, After All, A Biden

by Anne Laurie|  March 1, 20246:47 am| 100 Comments

This post is in: Impeachment Inquiry, Open Threads, Proud to Be A Democrat, Republican Venality

Fox host: Republicans have failed to produce any evidence for impeaching Biden after dozens of interviews and over 100,000 documents released pic.twitter.com/XRkaps8eCO

— Biden-Harris HQ (@BidenHQ) February 28, 2024

I'll walk through Hunter Biden's refutations of GOP allegations tomorrow. Tonight, I looked at the big picture of his testimony and his effective explanations of his career and his relationship with his father. No paywall: https://t.co/d3rn1BO7vZ

— Philip Bump (@pbump) March 1, 2024

No ‘On The Road’ behind the FYWP curtain this morning (there’s a bunch queued up for next week, don’t worry), so here’s a bonus post from me. From the rapidly-becoming-a-must-read Philip Bump, at the Washington Post, “Hunter Biden gives House Republicans the rebuttal they didn’t want”:

Hunter Biden’s appearance in front of investigators and members of the House Oversight and Judiciary Committees unfolded a bit like a Bruce Lee movie.

Republican legislators and interviewers challenging the president’s son on the House majority’s behalf would throw out an allegation, often one that’s been worn smooth after tumbling around in the right-wing media universe for the past year or two. And Biden would invariably swat it away, stripping off the layers of innuendo that had been applied by Donald Trump and Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) or Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) or any of myriad Fox News commentators.

This included epic battles against well-known foes, like an exchange between Hunter Biden and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), or repeated, extended back-and-forth with Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.). But at no point was a question left unanswered — including through an invocation of the Fifth Amendment — or, to an objective observer, left answered with obvious incompletion.

The discussion was centered on the Republican effort in the ongoing impeachment inquiry to demonstrate that President Biden had benefited financially from Hunter Biden’s business endeavors — and, they hoped, that the elder Biden had used his position as vice president to that end. They were unsuccessful in making that case from the hearing’s first moments.

show full post on front page

“I did not involve my father in my business,” Hunter Biden said in his opening comments, “not while I was a practicing lawyer, not in my investments or transactions, domestic or international, not as a board member, and not as an artist, never.” His position did not diverge from that at any point; instead, he frequently invoked this same claim over and over again as a means of cutting off one of the familiar lines of inquiry with which he was presented…

Hunter Biden’s testimony centered heavily on two themes. First, the closeness of his family, having been drawn together by the tragic deaths of his mother and, later, his brother. This is why he always took his father’s calls, he said, and why he would always welcome his father to join him at dinners.

“I can’t count the number of times my dad stopped to have dinner with me and my family,” he testified — including at a cafe that was situated between the White House and the vice-presidential residence.

The other was that Joe Biden was a career politician.

“My dad has been a United States Senator since I was 2 years old,” Biden said at one point. “My whole life has been this.”

His point? That glad-handing strangers and dropping into events was part of his father’s daily life — and therefore his own…

A legislator asked him whether he’d worked for foreign governments.

“I never worked for a country,” he replied. “I am not Jared Kushner.”…

.@RepRaskin: This impeachment inquiry has been a comedy of errors from the beginning…I think our colleagues would do best at this point to fold up the circus tent and allow us to focus on something that would actually be of benefit to the American people. pic.twitter.com/VLNbdaSsoc

— House Judiciary Dems (@HouseJudiciary) February 28, 2024

MAGA's impeachment goose chase can’t pin a high crime or misdemeanor on the president, and its original star witness sits in jail awaiting prosecution for lying to the FBI. And so it ends, not with a bang but a whimper.

Time to pack up the circus tent. pic.twitter.com/zaAx7G4mBO

— Rep. Jamie Raskin (@RepRaskin) February 29, 2024

Open Thread: Hunter Biden Is, After All, A BidenPost + Comments (100)

Open Thread: The GOP Has An Impeachment Problem

by Anne Laurie|  February 25, 20244:59 pm| 85 Comments

This post is in: Excellent Links, Impeachment Inquiry, Republican Venality, Republicans in Disarray!

Another 'Informant'  - STOCKPILE

(Clay Bennett via GoComics.com)

 
They know these non-stop show trials reflect badly on them, both the individual members & the GOP as a whole (not to mention wasting time & resources that could be of far better use elsewhere, because the GOP hasn’t cared about anything outside their own clan for at least fifty years)… but it feels so good in the moment!

Another GOP Biden ‘informant.’ Another indictment and link to Russia.https://t.co/Xyc8PvxVI6

— Aaron Blake (@AaronBlake) February 22, 2024

… This isn’t even the first time we’ve learned that a person has been indicted after the GOP cited his claims. Nor is it the first time a person has been linked to Russian intelligence after the GOP leaned on their version of events.

The cast of characters Republicans have sought out to substantiate President Biden’s purported corruption over the years has come to include half a dozen convicted and accused criminals, as well as multiple people the U.S. government has linked to Russia, corruption and subverting American democracy.

The most recent example is Alexander Smirnov, whom the government said last week had invented the claim that Biden and his son Hunter took $5 million bribes. That allegation was promoted far and wide by Republicans, many of whom treated it as fact.

The government then said this week that Smirnov has “extensive foreign ties, including, most troublingly and by his own account, contact with foreign intelligence services, including Russian intelligence agencies, and has had such contacts recently.”

The news comes seven months after the indictment of another GOP source was unsealed. Republicans had conspiratorially suggested that a key witness who claimed to have damaging information about Hunter Biden had mysteriously gone missing. It turned out the witness was Gal Luft, who the government said had skipped bail after his indictment for alleged arms trafficking and foreign lobbying violations was handed down months earlier…

Rooting out corruption sometimes involves dealing with unsavory characters. Some of the legal actions against Trump, for instance, have leaned on the testimony of his convicted former lawyer and fixer, Michael Cohen.

But thus far, Republicans have very little actual evidence against the Bidens to show for their efforts. And when your most-touted claim is apparently falling apart in spectacular fashion, against the backdrop of the aforementioned, it sure risks looking like you’re desperate for anything to grab hold of — no matter where it comes from.

COMER IN MAY: This is a very crucial piece of our investigation

COMER NOW: He wasn’t an important part of our investigation https://t.co/b2ThXIlifG pic.twitter.com/itHwsFvKg3

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) February 22, 2024

show full post on front page

Don’t think most people get the magnitude of the Hunter Biden/Smirnov revelations. One big ongoing Russian operation from 2015 until today. Basically confirms what was always obvious, “Hunter Biden laptop” was part of the same operation. https://t.co/m1fuUs0vR3 via @TPM

— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) February 21, 2024

Josh Marshall, at TPM, on “A Bigger Story Than You Can Possibly Imagine”:

… Let’s review recent events. First came the news that prosecutors in special counsel David Weiss’s office had decided that the confidential FBI informant who had been one of Biden’s top accusers had been lying and that they were charging him for lying to the FBI. That next step is critical. Informants lie to prosecutors all the time. They seldom get charged. It’s one standard to decide your informant isn’t telling the truth and/or won’t hold up at trial. It’s an entirely different one to think that you can prove they knowingly lied beyond a reasonable doubt. Clearly investigators felt they had caught Alexander Smirnov dead to rights. Yesterday came news that Smirnov has admitted that he got his false stories from Russian intelligence officers. Smirnov isn’t just at the center of the DOJ investigation, he’s at the center of what we have to generously call James Comer’s House inquiry, the premise for Joe Biden’s increasingly wobbly impeachment.

And on top of that, Hunter Biden’s lawyers are now claiming, as part of their effort to force new disclosures by Weiss’s office, that it was new or newly specific accusations from Smirnov which scuttled the plea deal which blew up as it was being agreed to in a federal court room. That point about the plea deal remains an accusation and obviously an interested one from Biden’s attorneys. But given what we’ve learned over the last week from the prosecution side — the folks who were repeatedly duped and took actions on the basis of disinformation directly from Russian intelligence — it seems to me highly likely that it’s true…

For years I’ve continued saying, against what seems like the unified thinking of every reporter, editorialist and credentialed smart person, that the fabled “Hunter Biden Laptop” was obviously the product of a Russian influence operation. The story was absurd on its face. Somehow Hunter Biden decided in a drugged-up fugue that he needed to take his laptop to a computer repair shop. He then forgot about it. The legally blind owner of the repair shop decided to crack it open and look at the files (as one does, of course) and then somehow managed to get the contents to Rudy Giuliani and Steve Bannon.

Sounds totally legit, as they say!…

Are we really supposed to believe that these Russian operations, which kicked off in 2015 and continued into 2017, were going full force through 2018 and 2019 with Rudy Giuliani and continue right up until today somehow played no role in the unbelievable story of Hunter Biden’s laptop? Of course they did.

In talking with David Kurtz before I started writing this David noted that we can’t really say Republicans and MAGA Republicans were duped. And that’s 100% right. The evolution of U.S. politics, egged along, skid-greased by helpful Russians, created a context in U.S. politics where these folks didn’t really have to be duped. The Russians under Putin are the good guys. If they’re making sure we have the most current information where’s the harm in that?

The real issue, as I note above, is the reporters, editorialists and commentators, who vouched for and credited this whole edifice of lies and bullshit. Yes, they guffawed when James Comer came forward yet again with more revelations that never quite panned out. But they didn’t give up hope. They were always waiting for the next revelation. Comer and his Republican colleagues hadn’t provided “hard evidence” yet but there sure was a lot of smoke.

This entire thing has been based on Russian plants and intelligence operations from the start. Every bit of it. It’s been obvious. And yet, well … they’re all dupes. Somehow almost a decade after this whole thing started we’re shocked to see, wow, Weiss’s office was being led around by another cat’s paw of the Russian intelligence services. We’re shocked. But why are we shocked? Every last person among the serious people of the nation’s capital and the sprawling thing called elite received opinion has egg on their face. And it’s not even clear they fully realize it yet.

it is honestly really hilarious how almost all of the most lurid resistlib talking points end up being true https://t.co/xOWgOplcdM

— Reconstructionist (@un_a_valeable) February 21, 2024

A note on the roots of the GOP addiction, from Mr. Charles P. Pierce’s weekly subscriber post:

When the news came down this week that Alexander Smirnov, whose charges against Hunter Biden and Hunter Biden’s father formed the basis of the snipe hunt that is the House “impeachment inquiry,” had been busted by the FBI because he allegedly made his whole tale up, probably with the help of the Russian intelligence apparatus, it was a no good, very bad day for Republican politicians, and for many members of our elite political media. Some of them gobbled up the bogus information that Smirnov laundered through the likes of Rep. James Comer because they believed it. More of them gobbled it up because scandals, even fake ones, are fun to cover. Another faction gobbled it up because they feel some vestigial moral obligation to lend credibility to both sides on everything. These are the most dangerous ones.

But all of them shared one fatal intellectual flaw — they declined for whatever reason not to entertain the notion that human laundromats like Comer, and House Judiciary chairman Jim Jordan, either didn’t know what they were talking about, or didn’t care to know what they were talking about. (The third alternative, that they knew they were passing along was disinformation, and that they did so anyway, is the most sinister.) There was an almost criminal lack of professionalism in so much of the coverage and now it has come a’cropper in the most embarrassing public way possible.

So far, the congressional suckers in this farce are sticking to their story. They don’t have a lot of choice in the matter. They’ve ridden the train too far to get off now. They can wait and see if the little momentum they have peters out on its own. They can hope that Merrick Garland’s Department of Justice slow-plays the prosecution of Mr. Smirnov until everybody forgets this week’s news. They can hope that the former president* becomes president*-elect and scrambles the country’s politics forever. But they can’t come off the hunt without angering their party’s irrational base while looking ridiculous to the rest of us and, possibly, putting themselves in legal jeopardy.

What is most interesting is how closely they followed the directions into what James Carville once called “the puke funnel” during the Republican pursuit of President Bill Clinton which, like the pursuit of the current president, began even before his hand had come off the Bible. Things were so much simpler, then. The ratfcking was all primarily domestic. Instead of Russian spooks, there was an incredible passel of poolroom liars from Arkansas doing business with conservative lawyers and activists in Washington. (Several of whom are d/b/a Never Trumpers of the Bulwark variety.) Instead of Comer and Jordan, we paid the salaries of Kenneth Starr and his bed-sniffing yahoos. But the game plan was the same — raise enough smoke in the far hinterlands to get the attention of the elite political press, find enough low-rent crooks who will say anything you want them to say, find some willing congresscritters to carry the ball forward in Washington, and watch the red lights ignite on a million cameras.

It was supposed to work this time, too…

GOP now openly admitting that they blew $41M — in their own salaries alone — pursuing a no-evidence of impeachment, all for naught. https://t.co/hFfd28a5fK

— emptywheel (@emptywheel) February 23, 2024

Open Thread: The GOP Has An Impeachment ProblemPost + Comments (85)

Cold Grey Pre-Dawn Open Thread: The GOP’s Hunter Sideshow

by Anne Laurie|  January 11, 20244:22 am| 61 Comments

This post is in: Excellent Links, Impeachment Inquiry, Open Threads, Republican Stupidity, Republican Venality

Cold Grey Pre-Dawn Open Thread:  The GOP's Hunter Sideshow

(John Deering via GoComics.com)

House Republicans demonstrate once again that their Biden probe is a vampire inquiry: sounds scary until you bring it into the sunlight.

Gift link, because it’s important to understand how the con here works. https://t.co/js6zDJVSk5

— Philip Bump (@pbump) January 11, 2024

Best summary I’ve seen so far of the GOP’s latest media-seeking circle-jerk: Philip Bump, for the Washington Post — “Weighing action against Hunter Biden, GOP resorts to falsehoods ” [unpaywalled]:

… Hunter Biden was subpoenaed for a deposition but through his attorney said he would appear before Oversight in an open hearing instead. (His attorney, in a letter to Comer, pointed to the chairman’s statement during a podcast that he would welcome either public or private testimony.) The date of the deposition came and went, and Republicans moved forward with approving a contempt-of-Congress referral.

What Hunter Biden no doubt knows is that a closed-door deposition allows Comer and other Republicans to cherry-pick claims much more easily — if they release the transcript of the deposition at all. (Most of the depositions that have taken place, Oversight Democrats note, have not been made public.)

During the meeting, Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Tex.) was pointed on this subject.

“Let me tell you why no one wants to talk to y’all behind closed doors,” she said to her Republican colleagues. “Because y’all lie.”

This is demonstrably true, including when considering the Archer testimony itself. It is fair to question the legitimacy of Hunter Biden’s failure to participate in the subpoenaed deposition, certainly, but it is indisputably justifiable for him to be wary of doing so.

When it was his turn to speak, Rep. Greg Casar (D-Tex.) raised a related, valid point: If Republicans were so desperate to hear from Hunter Biden, why didn’t they just go ahead and hold the open hearing anyway? The younger Biden had unexpectedly appeared in the hearing room, allowing Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-Fla.) to ask for a show of hands from the committee members about their willingness to swear Hunter Biden in for questions right then and there. None took him up on the offer…

show full post on front page

Moskowitz: Here is the subpoena to representative Scott Perry, who did not comply. Here is the subpoena to mark meadows who did not comply. Here is the subpoena to Jim Jordan who did not comply with a lawful subpoena. pic.twitter.com/E0s2MYsNPu

— Acyn (@Acyn) January 10, 2024

“We were here for a year,” [ranking Democrat Jamie Raskin] noted at one point. “You guys did not lay a glove on Joe Biden. You don’t have a single credible piece of evidence, not one iota, showing any crime by Joe Biden.”…

A bit later, Rep. Paul A. Gosar (R-Ariz.) offered a response to that claim. This wasn’t an impeachment itself but, instead, an inquiry into filing articles to impeach Biden.

“An inquiry is different than an impeachment,” he said. “It is a search for [a] document.”

A bit later, Raskin jumped in, noting that the inquiry has ostensibly been underway since September.

“What’s been found since then?” he asked.

“Once again, there’s stuff there,” Gosar said. “There is stuff there.”

“There’s stuff there?” Raskin replied. “Can you share it with us?”…

This was answered in a closed-door deposition six months ago. It is obvious once you consider the actual function of the LLCs, as The Post did in August. Both of which predate the September impeachment inquiry. An inquiry, mind you, that’s had only one public hearing — one featuring witnesses who were meant to demonstrate the sketchiness of Hunter Biden’s work but ended up pointing out that they had no direct evidence implicating Joe Biden.

After that hearing, a presumably embarrassed Comer told reporters that he didn’t like public hearings and might not hold any more. It’s much easier to bolster your narrative when you get to choose what parts of it people see.

The House Oversight Committee just held a recorded vote on whether to allow Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) to display redacted naked photos of Hunter Biden before Congress. The GOP-led committee voted along party lines, 21-to-15, to allow the photos.

— Matt Viser (@mviser) January 10, 2024

Do you think that when she was a young girl, the lady on the left dreamed of growing up to become the dick pic holding lackey for #MarjorieTaylorPeen over here? pic.twitter.com/5iToc3kTAg

— Kathleen Wolak (@wolak_kathleen) January 11, 2024

Also: You can’t simultaneously claim Hunter’s laptop is real AND declare he has no balls. The former shows clear evidence of the existence of the latter. https://t.co/ZltrQHAXvy

— Robert X George (@RobGeorge) January 10, 2024

If the MAGA Republicans wanted to go after foreign corruption, they would be investigating Donald Trump. We know that during his presidency, Trump received $7.8 million from foreign interests, including $5.5 million from China. But Mr. Jordan has not launched an investigation. pic.twitter.com/ruuhOYmTzB

— House Judiciary Dems (@HouseJudiciary) January 10, 2024

Mr. Pierce, at Esquire, on holding people in contempt:

… [Nancy Mace] then called for the younger Biden to be arrested on the spot. And, of all people, Rep. Andy Biggs called for a return to decorum. One of his colleagues then accused Biggs—Andy Freaking Biggs!—of “interrupting a woman. “Don’t act like a bunch of…nimrods,” Biggs said. And the world turned upside down. “I believe,” Mace concluded, “that Hunter Biden should be hauled off to jail right now.”

A timeline is helpful here. Comer, who couldn’t run a two-car funeral if you spotted him the hearse, repeatedly said in various television appearances that Hunter Biden could choose to testify in public, or to sit for a secret deposition. Biden accepted the former option, at which point Comer pulled the clumsiest and most obvious bait-and-switch one could imagine, insisting on the private—and easily manipulated—deposition, and then proposing to hold Biden in contempt of Congress for refusing to sit for the deposition. We continue.

Biden thereupon completed his coup de main by ostentatiously walking out when it was time for Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene to use up five minutes of otherwise valuable oxygen, Considering that the MTG had used a previous hearing to display dick pics of Biden while Comer sat there like a lump of goo, I’d say Biden acted with considerable restraint in leaving the hearing without flipping the congresswoman off, but she got to call him a coward for the cameras, so her work for the day was done. I left the proceedings when Trumpist Rep. Byron Donalds defended the former president*’s profiteering by talking about how luxurious his hotels are, and by waving off the Emoluments clause of the Constitution as though it were an ancient Blue Law forbidding public entertainments of the Sabbath. The committee is going to vote to hold Hunter Biden in contempt, and the entire House will endorse the decision, and Nancy Mace, I guess, will get several additional opportunities to talk about his balls. It’s enough to make you nostalgic for Louie Gohmert.

Cold Grey Pre-Dawn Open Thread:  The GOP's Hunter Sideshow 1

(Mike Luckovich via GoComics.com)

Cold Grey Pre-Dawn Open Thread: The GOP’s Hunter SideshowPost + Comments (61)

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 31
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - frosty - 3rd Annual National Park/COVID Challenge - Oregon - Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area - Engineering
Photo by frosty (4/3/26)
Donate

Election Resources

Voter Registration Info – Find a State
Check Voter Registration by Address
Election Calendar by State

Targeted Fundraising Info & Links

Recent Comments

  • lowtechcyclist on Open Thread: RETVRN (to the Religious Wars) (Apr 3, 2026 @ 8:08pm)
  • WaterGirl on Open Thread: Banger Memes, Dude (Apr 3, 2026 @ 8:07pm)
  • NotMax on Open Thread: RETVRN (to the Religious Wars) (Apr 3, 2026 @ 8:05pm)
  • Bupalos on Open Thread: RETVRN (to the Religious Wars) (Apr 3, 2026 @ 8:04pm)
  • Fair Economist on Open Thread: RETVRN (to the Religious Wars) (Apr 3, 2026 @ 8:04pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Outsmarting Apple iOS 26

Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Order Calendar A
Order Calendar B

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix
Rose Judson (podcast)

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Privacy Manager

Copyright © 2026 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc