This is a beauty. I guess the new Democrat leisure activity is to take everything Bush has said over the past three years and to distort it or parse it for the most ridiculous meaning. For example, try this one on for size from the Calpundit:
QUESTION: Sir, why should we be more worried about Saddam Hussein, who has no nuclear weapons, than Kim Chong-il, who is unstable and does have nuclear weapons?
THE PRESIDENT: Well, first of all, I think it’s important to remember that Saddam Hussein was close to having a nuclear weapon. We don’t know whether or not he has a nuclear weapon. We do expect him to disarm his weapons of mass destruction, that’s what we expect.
To which the Calpundit states: Nobody