Via Greg Sargent, David S. Bernstein at the Boston Phoenix has a Romney anecdote too good not to share:
The story comes from the Boston Globe’s seven-part 2007 series on the life of Romney. In Part 3, William Bain tells Romney that he and the Bain partners have chosen him to head a new spinoff company, Bain Capital:
In early spring of 1983, with the sun pouring into his office in the Faneuil Hall marketplace, Bain offered Romney the job that would make his career. Romney balked, catching Bain off guard.
__
Romney explained that he didn’t want to risk his position, earnings, and reputation on an experiment in investing. The offer was appealing, Romney recalled in a recent interview, but he wasn’t going to make such a decision in a “light or flippant manner.”
__
So Bain sweetened the offer. He guaranteed that if the experiment failed, Romney would get his old job and salary back, plus any raises handed out during his absence.
__
Romney had one more concern: the impact on his reputation should he prove unable to do the job. In the end, Bain agreed to craft a cover story if necessary, promising to bring Romney back to the consulting firm and explain Romney’s return as a matter of his being more valuable to Bain as a consultant.
__
“So,” Bain says, “there was no professional or financial risk.”To me, this vignette perfectly gets to the core of Mitt Romney (not to mention the whole rigged game of American wealth and finance). Romney always leverages his considerable assets — his business and managerial skills, his personal access and influence, his wealth — to manipulate circumstances to avoid personal risk. And while that includes risk to his personal finances and professional career, the number-one goal is to protect, at all costs, the Mitt Romney brand…
__
Most striking about this Bain anecdote is the pre-arranged dishonesty — a conspiracy before the fact, so to speak, to lie and cover up for failure. He was already adept at the tactic back then, in his 30s, when his leverage and power was still relatively weak. I would argue that he has made similar arrangements at almost every step along his path. Of course, it’s very hard to tell whether people have agreed to lie on someone’s behalf or not. But it certainly seems that Romney has always been able to seize credit for successes, and avoid blame for problems…
Sterling character, that Romney fella — takes a mort of regular polishing to keep the tarnish off. Not so suprising that “most of Romney’s big early donors from his first presidential campaign have deserted him in his second“:
There is no single explanation for the desertion of more than 10,000 individuals — a potential loss of some $25 million to the campaign.
__
But one conclusion is inescapable: even among his supporters, there’s not much enthusiasm for a Romney presidency.
__
And that, according to his supporters and detractors alike, stems from Romney’s ever-changing persona. Whatever version of Romney you once supported, it’s not the same Romney who is asking for your money today…
Well worth clicking through, for much more detail at the link.
Run, Willard, Run (Like the Gutless Coward You Are)Post + Comments (39)