Here I was about to write a semi-long post about the Clinton campaign’s fourth-quarter full court press with no goalie, and then I see Tom Levenson wrote it first.
[B]roadly speaking, judging by the issues papers on her website, Clinton has maintained a fairly sophisticated approach to global warming and applied research, with the implication that the policies near and dear to scientists’ hearts — more money, and even more important, respect for the real knowledge developed within by scientific process, would flow under a Clinton presidency. What Clinton provided for public consumption may be boilerplate, but it has been good boilerplate.But now, what she said at the Indiana interview this morning changes the game. She said, in effect, if the smart boys and girls don’t agree with her, then to hell with them.
That is, of course, precisely the anti-rational madness that has dominated the George Bush years. It is inimical to science or a scientific world view. If we are to pick and choose the facts we like, it is a very short step, quickly taken, to making them up. And that way lies an ever more rapid collapse of the American republic.
Do I have anything to add? Not really. Hillary seemed to be doing fine until the inevitability meme died, and then her campaign went a little crazy. It’s reached the point now where she doesn’t just sound like a Republican, she sounds like the intellectual dregs that the GOP tries to keep off of network TV. She sounds like David Horowitz. Are we really that far from Gastaxofascism Awareness Week? Her rhetoric offers up the same paranoid conviction that all of the experts on Earth are either wrong or out to get you.
Maybe Hillary knows that her populist message really is pap and nonsense, but then maybe Horowitz does too. They’re both either stupid enough to believe what they’re saying or enough morally stunted to lead masses down an intellectually poisonous path in return for some cheap attention.
I’ll still vote Democratic regardless of who wins this forever primary; Supreme Court appointments matter too much to consider anything else. That said, if Dems offer this kind of leadership in ’09 I promise the same party loyalty that John showed after Schiavo.

