Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Let there be snark.

If rights aren’t universal, they are privilege, not rights.

It’s always darkest before the other shoe drops.

Washington Post Catch and Kill, not noticeably better than the Enquirer’s.

Stamping your little feets and demanding that they see how important you are? Not working anymore.

Narcissists are always shocked to discover other people have agency.

Within six months Twitter will be fully self-driving.

Imperialist aggressors must be defeated, or the whole world loses.

Following reporting rules is only for the little people, apparently.

fuckem (in honor of the late great efgoldman)

Too often we hand the biggest microphones to the cynics and the critics who delight in declaring failure.

The most dangerous place for a black man in America is in a white man’s imagination.

Nancy smash is sick of your bullshit.

You cannot shame the shameless.

Do we throw up our hands or do we roll up our sleeves? (hint, door #2)

Dumb motherfuckers cannot understand a consequence that most 4 year olds have fully sorted out.

“woke” is the new caravan.

Rupert, come get your orange boy, you petrified old dinosaur turd.

Roe is not about choice. It is about freedom.

Since we are repeating ourselves, let me just say fuck that.

Republicans: The threats are dire, but my tickets are non-refundable!

You know it’s bad when the Project 2025 people have to create training videos on “How To Be Normal”.

The cruelty is the point; the law be damned.

Peak wingnut was a lie.

You are here: Home / Politics / America / Whistleblower States that Cambridge Analytica, Subsidiary of British Defence Contractor to the Ministry of Defence and US DOD, Was a Bridging Node to the Russians

Whistleblower States that Cambridge Analytica, Subsidiary of British Defence Contractor to the Ministry of Defence and US DOD, Was a Bridging Node to the Russians

by | 241 Comments

This post is in: , , , , , , , , , ,

This was a joint appearance event, including Q&A, held today in London. A lot of important news was made:

Chris Wylie’s answer here, if it is borne out, clearly places Cambridge Analytica, a subsidiary of the defense and intelligence contractor SCL, doing work for Russian interests. This is noteworthy for two different, but equally important reasons. The first is that it provides some of the first direct evidence, by direct statement of one of the principles and founders of Cambridge Analytica as a subsidiary of SCL, that Cambridge Analytica had concrete, for profit ties to Russia. Making it a bridging node in the network of groups, people, and organizations involved in the US 2014 and 2016 elections and the Russians. The second is that a subsidiary of SCL, which is essentially a private, for contract intelligence company, was doing work for Russian interests at the same time that the parent company was doing work for the British Ministry of Defence and the US DOD.

I’ve been a defense contractor off and on for over a decade. This included doing what is essentially a niche form of  intelligence work for the US Army. I have also served on two different term appointments as a senior civil servant under the Intergovernmental Personnel Act. One of my biggest concerns as a national security professional has always been about the privatization of intelligence work. I’ve had the pleasure of working for an excellent, small defense contractor (who I’m currently still with) that appreciates professional ethics, providing quality work for the governmental client, and has my back. This was also the case for the not for profit sponsoring agent for my Intergovernmental Personnel Appointment. Unfortunately, I’ve also worked for a terrible business development unit (BDU) of a very large multinational defense and intelligence contractor that, through hard experience, I trust to do what is best for their bottom line to the exclusion of all else – including the right thing. So I can say I’ve experienced the best and worst of the contractor world. Having a subsidiary of a defense and intelligence contractor that is doing political intelligence work for Russian interests at the same time that the parent company is doing intelligence and/or intelligence related work for the MOD, the DOD, and NATO should be raising red flags in DC, London, and Brussels. Given what we know of how Nix and his partners conduct business, national security and counterintelligence professionals in the US, the UK, and at NATO HQ should be very, very, very concerned that whatever they were paying SCL to do has managed to make its way to Cambridge Analytica’s Russian clients.

Other important news was also made at this event about Steve Bannon, Robert Mercer, and their interest in the UK Independence Party (UKIP) and Brexit:

You’ll notice that Andrew Breitbart’s “politics is downstream of culture” concept was in play here.

Finally, some absolutely revolting news was also broken at this event pertaining to Shahmir Sanni. If there is any justice left in Her Majesty’s kingdom, it will be the end of Theresa May’s political career, as well as the two lowlifes on her staff responsible for outing Sanni and placing his family in Pakistan in jeopardy:

The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation provides us with some interesting information about Wylie:

A Canadian data expert who set off an international uproar over the alleged leak of private Facebook user data lost his job years ago in the office of former Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff, in large part because he was pushing a nascent form of the controversial data-harvesting technique, says a former senior party insider.

Years ago, when he was working in Ignatieff’s office, Wylie had already begun to develop strategies on how politicians could capitalize on data collected through social media, said a former senior Liberal insider who spoke on condition of anonymity.

At the time, the idea was viewed as too invasive and raised concerns with the Liberals, who declined to have anything to do with it, said the insider: Wylie’s recommended data-collection approach spooked party officials to the point that it became an significant factor behind their decision not to renew his contract in 2009.

“Let’s say he had boundary issues on data even back then,” said the source, who noted that Wylie’s recent descriptions of his methods in media reports sounded familiar.

“He effectively pitched an earlier version of exactly this to us back in 2009 and we said, ‘No.”‘

Some of his ideas may not have even been fully possible at the time, but the “whip-smart” Wylie appears to have continued to pursue them, said the insider.

Wylie, who left Cambridge Analytica in 2014, has not responded to repeated interview requests from The Canadian Press.

There is clearly more to Wylie, or rather the story that is Wylie, than what he is promoting as the righteous whistle blower against Cambridge Analytica, SCL, Aggregate IQ (AIQ), UKIP, various pro-Brexit front groups, numerous GOP campaigns and conservative Super PACs, Steve Bannon, and the Mercers. Tonight’s revelations, however, provide greater clarity to our understanding of just what Cambridge Analytica was and who it was connected to.

Finally, tomorrow should be a wild ride in Britain:

Stay frosty!

Open thread.

Reader Interactions

241Comments

  1. 1.

    Corner Stone

    Whistleblower States that Cambridge Analytica, Subsidiary of British Defense Contractor to the Ministry of Defense and US DOD, Was a Bridging Node to the Russians

    Means nothing.

  4. 4.

    Fair Economist

    It was pretty obvious CambAnal was a bridging node to the Russians but I am boggled proof came out so quickly. I think this is what made the Russians get so aggressive with their butchery lately. The threads from this will probably lead to the bridging nodes for all the other elections they have been meddling in.

  7. 7.

    Gvg

    So the guy blowing the whistle now was in the past pushing the bad behavior? I need a score card. Always had a bad memory for names.

  8. 8.

    Mnemosyne

    The Canadian information makes me a little wary of Wylie as a “whistleblower.” It makes him feel a little Snowden to me, if you know what I mean.

  9. 9.

    hellslittlestangel

    Conservatives are the same everywhere: cruel, selfish and criminal. Their universal language is hate.

  10. 10.

    GregB

    Apparently fascist globalism is just fine with all of these nativist assholes.

    Let’s not forget that Fuckface Farage was seen waltzing out of the Ecuadoran embassy at one point in 2017.

  11. 11.

    Mary G

    Wow. And I thought Republicans were assholes. This is on a whole ‘nother level. British politics is as big a mess as ours is. Theresa May should resign, call an election, get Shamir’s family the help they need yesterday, and the new Prime Minister needs to start a truth and reconciliation commission, to uproot all the collaborators with Russia in England. Doubt any of it will happen, but what a bombshell. Hillary was right again. Deplorable is the only word.

    The Mercers can probably buy their way out of trouble, but I want them exposed and shamed. Bannon will be the scapegoat and I can’t find myself to feel a bit sorry for him.

  13. 13.

    Jay

    In his interviews, Wylie comes “out” as an “autistic gay vegan” who was chasing the math, the data, the possibilities, the science,

    Right up until he realized what he had done.

    The Oppenhiemer Effect.

    Kozinski spent the last 4 years touring the world and giving acedemic lectures warning that the junction of Big Data, and OCEAN, could be “weaponized”, but nobody listened.

  14. 14.

    p.a.

    Putin and Western crypto-fascists (some not so crypto) playing Jenga with the western alliance. Now the mask is tearing, their tower is in danger too. US Rethugs protecting that one, not US’s or NATO’s. Hang ‘em high.

  15. 15.

    Adam L Silverman

    @Fair Economist: We do now know about the connections going back to the initial 2010 tea party wave of Cambridge Analytica and GOP candidates, campaigns, and conservative Super PACs. So I think you’re correct that we’re going to learn a lot more in short order. Carole Cadwalladr and several other British journalists have their teeth into this and aren’t going to let go until they’re good and ready.

  19. 19.

    Tokyokie

    @Mary G: Fuck ’em. Go after the Mercers under the RICO statute and confiscate everything they own, then sling their asses into federal lockups for the rest of their miserable lives. And do the same for the whole sorry lot of these Russian toadies.And if you think I’m being too harsh, just consider that these obscenely wealthy ass pustules were happy to usher in a worldwide fascist empire headed by Putin just so they could become even more obscenely wealthy.

  20. 20.

    Mnemosyne

    @Ryan:

    Be prepared — the next wave of “left wing” propaganda will say that this was all Obama and Hillary’s fault for not warning us hard enough and/or not doing enough to protect us. And a lot of Democrats will fall for it, because we’re accustomed to blaming our politicians for the bad actions of the Republicans.

  21. 21.

    debbie

    @Tokyokie:

    It wouldn’t surprise me if the Trump administration was doing all they could to stop that or at least slow it down until after the midterms.

  22. 22.

    Mnemosyne

    @Adam L Silverman:

    Not really Snowden like. More self interested/self profiting mercenary.

    That’s kind of what I mean. How many different people are paying him to do this, and why? I don’t believe the sudden attack of conscience.

  25. 25.

    Mathguy

    Funny how the FTFNYTimes seems to be ignoring all of this. Checked the website and….nada on the front page.

  26. 26.

    Corner Stone

    @Adam L Silverman: Unfortunately, we have a segment of people here who think the skirt chasing aspect of CA is what they did. And not the larger picture of what we see unfolding.

  27. 27.

    sdhays

    Holy crap. SCL should lose its western contracts immediately. I wonder what this information about the Leave campaign means for Brexit. From what I’ve been reading, it’s a complete loser for the UK (on top of just being nasty), so they would do well to take any opportunity to pull back from the ledge. But will the public demand it?

  29. 29.

    sdhays

    @Mnemosyne: I’m not commenting on whether his change of heart is or is not genuine (skepticism is definitely warranted), but it does happen. The guy at Media Matters is a big example.

  31. 31.

    Mary G

    Too bad Maggie and the rest of our media are too busy covering the horse race and gossip, afraid to jeopardize access, to do this reporting. I already give to the Guardian monthly and wish I could increase it.

  32. 32.

    Tokyokie

    @debbie: Slow down the investigation until after the midterms? Hell no, he wants to scuttle the whole damn investigation even if doing so means laying the entire history of Anglo-American jurisprudence in ruins. Because his sense of self-worth is the most important development in the history of mankind.

    There are but four issues on the November ballot: Impeach. Remove. Indict. Imprison. Every last fucking one of the GOP traitors.

  33. 33.

    Adam L Silverman

    @Mnemosyne: That wasn’t my point. The migrating material he thinks would be useful/profitable to himself later from one job to another is what I meant by mercenary.

  35. 35.

    Adam L Silverman

    @debbie: Fortunately, every military base and intel installation in the US was hardened against this type of thing after 9-11 and the subsequent anthrax letters.

  37. 37.

    tobie

    I’m still of the opinion that both CA and parent company SCI fed information to the Russians to do the really sophisticated data mining stuff. The kind of infrastructure you would need to do the micro-targeting CA supposedly did is huge. I just don’t see how the company alone would have been able to do everything from the market testing to the delivery of targeted messages and whatever else without outside help.

    On the other hand, maybe I’m overestimating the difficulty of targeted ad campaigns when you have access to 50 million Facebook accounts.

  38. 38.

    Adam L Silverman

    @Corner Stone: This is true. But I also think it is because there are too few folks like me being consulted by the broadcast and cable news and print news media who actually understand how this stuff works. So they follow the parts of the story that make sense to the reporters.

  40. 40.

    Adam L Silverman

    I’m beginning to think there might be something wrong with the President’s judgement:

  41. 41.

    Another Scott

    Finally, tomorrow should be a while ride in Britain:

    “Curse you Autocorrect!!11”

    :-)

    Cheers,
    Scott.

  42. 42.

    Jay

    @Mnemosyne:

    Wylie’s whistle blowing, Kosinski’s been trying to warn people for years,

    Kogan aka Dr. Spectre’s denying it had anything to do with him or his work,

    Chancellor, Kogan’s former partner, and Stillwell, Kozinski’s former partner, work for Facebook now.

  43. 43.

    Adam L Silverman

    @sdhays: Exactly. And a full CI investigation needs to be opened and a full CI scrub conducted on everything they’ve worked on, had visibility on, touched, seen, etc.

    As to the UK issues regarding Brexit, tomorrow’s Common’s debate should get that ball rolling. Brexit has been embarrassingly expensive enough so far as it is. Since they’re learning they were manipulated into Brexit by Americans who could have cared less about the British, but wanted to use Britain and Brexit for their own purposes in the US, that should change the debate over how to proceed. It’ll be politically embarrassing and there will be political pain as a result, but what is coming out is clearly demonstrating that a lot of the support for Brexit was artificially created for the benefit of people who weren’t British.

  45. 45.

    Mnemosyne

    @tobie:

    I’m still of the opinion that both CA and parent company SCI fed information to the Russians to do the really sophisticated data mining stuff.

    I would suspect that you’re right — CA took the Facebook data, sent it to the Russians to do the actual work, and then sent it back to the Republicans to place the ads. And I think the odds that the Republicans didn’t know about the Russian connections are very, very low at this point.

    @Adam L Silverman:

    I’m always suspicious when a mercenary claims he’s had a sudden attack of conscience. YMMV.

  46. 46.

    debbie

    @Adam L Silverman:

    Good, but my first thought was to wonder whether this was a militia-type operation or a Russian operation parading as a militia-type operation. I’m afraid I’m going to start seeing Russians everywhere.

  48. 48.

    piratedan

    so its means that Vladdy has been working at this a looong time, splitting off the UK from Europe, helping to bankroll and coordinate the racism and tea party in the US.

    Will take a very tiny leap here and going to go on the record here and state just how much cahooting is in place between the Russians and Fox News and the rest of Rupert’s empire and say that this is looking extremely sinister.

  50. 50.

    Sm*t Cl*de

    @sdhays:
    so they would do well to take any opportunity to pull back from the ledge. But will the public demand it?
    Unfortunately all the top candidates to take May’s place as PM have pinned their careers on pursuing Brexit. What might be good for the UK, and what the public actually prefers at this point, are irrelevant.

    There is a kind of institutional cognitive-dissonance-reduction in progress. “We have decided to do it, therefore all those reasons why we shouldn’t do it are suddenly unimportant.”

    It is as if the British governing establishment read Tuchman’s “The March of Folly” and decided to take it as a guide.

  55. 55.

    Adam L Silverman

    @Jay: I’m not just talking about the toolset, but also migrating data and other information he thought might be of use at a later date. Which is what the Liberal Party official is alleging in the CBC piece.

  56. 56.

    Anne Laurie

    Thanks for this, Adam!

    I’m willing to believe — given the info we’ve gotten so far — that Wiley really is an “on the spectrum” (self diagnosed?), socially inept young man who just didn’t realize the implications of his “what’s mine is mine, and what I can pry away from ‘the commons’ is mine too” mindset. If only because I’ve known so many of that ilk, in the considerable crossover between infotech-engineering and sci-fi fandom, over the last forty years. They learn, if they ever do, solely through personal experience; it was pointed out to me many years ago that sf is particularly attractive to smart people who don’t “intuit” human behavior naturally — the spell-everything-out quality of world-building comes easier to some of us than the behavior of “ordinary” characters in “normal” fiction…

  57. 57.

    GregB

    It is almost as if there is a global cabal of rich plutocrats who abhor democracy and self determination among the world’s citizens and have used their money to help destroy those causes.

  58. 58.

    Feebog

    @Adam L Silverman:

    Trumpov is at least supposed to be “media savvy”. If he tries to bring Porter back on staff that particular myth will burn faster than the Hindenburg.

  59. 59.

    Mike J

    @Adam L Silverman:

    he thinks would be useful/profitable to himself later from one job to another is what I meant by mercenary.

    Consultants who don’t actually join the orgs they work for are “mercenaries”. A military consultant is telling us this.

  61. 61.

    Another Scott

    Twitler earlier tonight:

    Trade talks going on with numerous countries that, for many years, have not treated the United States fairly. In the end, all will be happy!

    5:44 PM – 26 Mar 2018

    All the numerous countries that have treated the US unfairly are having trade talks? Talks that will make all of them happy?

    Based on his foreign policy “achievements” it does seem like he’s working against the interests of the United States. Kinda interesting to see him admit it. (At least one can read it that way…)

    Seriously, what’s with the weird passive voice in that Tweet?!? Is he doing anything at all except watching TV, Tweeting, and playing golf on the weekends??? Does anyone really think that he personally signed off on kicking the Russian spies out today????!

    (sigh)

    Cheers,
    Scott.

  62. 62.

    piratedan

    @Mnemosyne: I’m not, those tendrils extend into the evangelicals too, the NRA, the nazi’s, the loony left, the sovereign citizen crew wouldn’t be surprised to see the ant-abortionists on that list too… namely anyone who’s a one-hit wonder off the mainstream gets to be radicalized and roped in it seems…

    it’s a wonder that Obama didn’t try to Seal Team Six Putin’s ass, but it’s not as if he wasn’t fighting on all of these other fronts (courtesy of Vald’s moneyed friends in Russia and the US)

  63. 63.

    Adam L Silverman

    @Mike J: I have done two stints inside the government on term appointments. I’ve also worked as a full time equivalent contractor and in both cases was willing to migrate to civil service had that been an option. That wasn’t. Since that most recent assignment I’ve worked as a consultant because that is what it takes to pay the bills. But I have raised my hand and taken the oath and have always put that above everything else. My current boss (CEO of the company I’m with) appreciates that. The first company I worked as a contractor for didn’t.

    On a more personal note: I’ve had two term appointments, as well as three full time equivalent contract positions disappear on me since 2014 because of the sequester, the failure to actually produce proper appropriations, or a combination of the two. At this point the key is to survive while not violating the oaths I’ve taken until I can get back onto the type of assignment I prefer.

  64. 64.

    Fair Economist

    @tobie: My impression is that CambAnal *was* doing the microtargeting. Russia provided money to pay for it, hackers to get the blackmail, and trolls to spread the messages. There has been a lot of discussion about the Russian troll farms saying somebody in the West must have been guiding them.

    I think that CambAnal may have helped guide the hacking, directing it at things that could have the most influence.

  65. 65.

    Jay

    @Adam L Silverman:

    As we have seen, there seems to be a Tech Ethic’s Fail over data ownership.

    At this time, it’s not clear that Wylie “took” any data, Canadian Liberal Party datasets would be useless in Brexit, and Brexit dataset’s would be useless in Trump/Russia.

    Wylie’s “toolkits” were his algorythm’s, which appear so far, to be his IP. Working as a contractor with larger and larger data sets, allowed him to hone his algorthm’s and develop new ones.

    Almost all the AI guy’s say that one of the first things a fully sentient AI will do is try to kill all humans, but they keep working at it.

  66. 66.

    Raoul

    @debbie: FEC is already warning that they won’t likely release any reports on the Stormy campaign finance allegations for a year. In other words, no reports of possible repercussions for finance rule violators till after November 2018. Hmmmmmmmm.

  69. 69.

    Anne Laurie

    @Raoul:

    The Mercers are some seriously, seriously f’ked up rich people.

    To quote Terry Pratchett, concerning a particularly effective assassin: He saw things differently than other people, and part of that was seeing other people as things.

  71. 71.

    Adam L Silverman

    @Mary G: My guess is that the Crown Prince purchased that edition, so to speak. Paying for it out of his own accounts or via one of the Saudi sovereign wealth funds.

  72. 72.

    Raoul

    @Mary G: I did a one-off donation to the Guardian recently, when I realised I was visiting them more than I’d have thought I might. And that was all before CA. I need to do more.

  73. 73.

    dm

    @Adam L Silverman: I’m going to say that this behavior isn’t that surprising to me — particularly in the 2009 time-frame, as there spectrum of ethics about that kind of data was still pretty broad, especially if you didn’t think those ethical concerns applied to you or the ways you intended to use the data.

    That data is hard to come by, so of course he kept it — who knows what techniques he’ll learn next week or next year to extract new, interesting patterns in the metadata. Of course, he can’t publish, because the data is tainted, but he can hone his skills, and maybe polish a few tricks he can apply later in his work.

    But then, I’ve known a few data pack-rats. (ETA: see Jay’s remark about “Tech Ethics fail about data ownership”.)

    I’m a bit puzzled about the timeline of the explosion of Cambridge Analytica stories. Wylie can’t be the ultimate cause, can he? BBC4 had been working on their sting for months. I suppose Wylie’s story may have prompted BBC4 to release their story (or news of the impending BBC4 story prompted Wylie to act).

  74. 74.

    Raoul

    @Adam L Silverman:

    Since they’re learning they were manipulated into Brexit by Americans who could have cared less about the British, but wanted to use Britain and Brexit for their own purposes in the US, that should change the debate over how to proceed.

    Given the ties between the Mercers and so many in the GOP, our special relationship — already quite strained by Trump — will take another big hit this week. No wonder we expelled a bunch of Russians today, we have to do some face-saving with our UK friends (and I am glad we’ve done this expulsion — or announced it, I think it takes a few days to be in full effect, tidy up, boys!)

  75. 75.

    Adam L Silverman

    @dm: That sounds about right.

    As for the timeline, my understanding is that Carole Cadwalladr had been cultivating him as a confidential source in her reporting at The Guardian for about a year or so. Why he decided to come out of the shadows at this point, I do not know.

  77. 77.

    Adam L Silverman

    @Raoul: The expulsion of the Russian for covers was basically forced on the President by the intel community. We basically have two different foreign policies running at the same time. One of them involves the President and what he either says to the press off the cuff or tweets.

  79. 79.

    tobie

    @Mnemosyne: @Adam L Silverman: @Fair Economist: I have no idea what Wylie’s motivations are. Like all human beings he’s a bundle of contradictory emotions. I suspect he’s both terrified and thrilled at the power he thinks he had. I know lots of guys who’ve been working for years on machine translation. They are all guys, all PhDs, all with significant training in probability theory and advanced mathematics, all devoted full-time to research, and I don’t think a single one of them would say they could do what they do without a massive team, an open research community where idea are exchanged and debated and peer reviewed. Wylie as far as I know studied law for a time at LSE but not math or computer science. Could he have stood at the forefront of the largest and most successful data mining operation in history? Possibly, but color me skeptical. One day we will know the full division of labor. Right now we’re just getting bits and pieces.

  80. 80.

    Jay

    @Adam L Silverman:

    The Great Brexit Train Robbery, published in May last year, started the thread pulling, that lead to AggregateIQ in Canada, and Wylie, although Wylie had left AggregateIQ in 2016 after Treason Tribble’s “election” and was laying low in Edmonton Alberta, trying to figure out what to do.

  82. 82.

    Spc

    @tobie: you are; micro targeting is easy when you have good data and is standard practice for experienced digital marketers. The bigger story here is the acquisition of the data itself, the election laws broken in its deployment, and the paymasters behind these efforts.

  83. 83.

    Cheryl Rofer

    @Adam L Silverman: And it has to have been the State Department, probably Defense as well, that coordinated the expulsions with the other countries. So they’re not totally out of the picture yet. It’s the President on one side and the rest of the government on the other.

  84. 84.

    cain

    @Tokyokie:

    There are but four issues on the November ballot: Impeach. Remove. Indict. Imprison. Every last fucking one of the GOP traitors.

    My fear is that the Democratic party will not have the will to put these fuckers in jail. They need to convict all of them. I was just looking through all these Republican politicians in the white house and it seems like almost all of these fuckers came from the Nixon era. That administration seems to have created all these devils.

    The only cure is to throw their asses all in jail. One thing I’ve noticed is that any kind of emphatic response will have the right take advantage of them. We cannot fear them and their anger. Let them riot. We’lll put them down like the dogs they are and toss their asses in jail. It’s the only way to get rid of this sickness.

  85. 85.

    Adam L Silverman

    @tobie: He’s made out to be an autodidactic savant at this stuff. I have no way of knowing if that is, in fact, the case.

  87. 87.

    Adam L Silverman

    @Jay: Yep. I’m pretty sure I linked to it in a post here, but I’ve (unfortunately had to) done so many posts on this stuff, I’ve begun to lose track.

  91. 91.

    Mary G

    Super excited for this!

    “It’s a show about people trying to get love, and shit gets in the way.”

    That’s how the late Garry Shandling described his groundbreaking sitcom The Larry Sanders Show, an inside-showbiz series about the office culture surrounding a talk show. But the line also sums up the life of Garry Shandling as described by his friend, collaborator, and showbiz pupil Judd Apatow in his two-part documentary The Zen Diaries of Garry Shandling, premiering Monday night on HBO.

  92. 92.

    Chet Murthy

    @tobie:

    maybe I’m overestimating the difficulty of targeted ad campaigns when you have access to 50 million Facebook accounts.

    Something to keep in mind: this isn’t actually a lot of data. 50m voter files …. well, let’s assume we have a megabyte of data per voter (wildly large[*]), that’s 50TB, and these days, you can buy single machines with that kind of RAM capacity …. if you needed it. Which you don’t. Basically, you’re still in the range of single computers (admittedly beefy servers, but still). There’s a big difference between this, and the kind of data-mining/analysis that FAANG do — there, they’re analyzing click-logs, ad-impressions, stuff that is 100-1000x more voluminous. I’m not exaggerating when I say that individual data-sets can be multiple PB in size. So by comparison, this is just …. small beer.

    One wonders who did what in this criminal conspiracy . It seems like CA had data-mining/analytics. Maybe Russia had the bots & delivery channels (run the ad campaigns, etc)?

    [*] it’s certain that each user’s FB file is much bigger than a megabyte. But the way you do machine learning, is by extracting relevant “features” from the data, and then running your algorithms on that. You don’t train on full data-sets, b/c there’s too much noise in there, and all ML algiorithms are weak/finicky. Feed ’em too much noisy data, and they fall down.

  94. 94.

    Major Major Major Major

    @Jay:

    In his interviews, Wylie comes “out” as an “autistic gay vegan” who was chasing the math, the data, the possibilities, the science,

    Right up until he realized what he had done.

    The Oppenhiemer Effect.

    Don’t insult Oppenheimer. It doesn’t take a genius to notice these gaping privacy holes, do some mining, and run some regressions.

  95. 95.

    cain

    @Raoul:

    @debbie: FEC is already warning that they won’t likely release any reports on the Stormy campaign finance allegations for a year. In other words, no reports of possible repercussions for finance rule violators till after November 2018. Hmmmmmmmm.

    That’s fine, by then we’ll have congress (and we are going have congress) and we’ll nail Trump’s ass to the wall when it comes out.

  96. 96.

    Raoul

    @Adam L Silverman: That definitely makes sense. I guess there are still some ways that he can be gotten to (or worked around) to preserve some of our relationships.
    I hope it’s true that the Mercers and their utterly amoral, self-absorbed goals in pushing Brexit redound very, very badly for them in the British Parliament and press. They deserve plenty of blowback for it. As do all the GOPers and GOP-tied groups that take their filthy lucre.

  97. 97.

    Major Major Major Major

    Semi-related:

    Tech buzzwords explained:

    AI—regression
    Big data—data
    Blockchain—database
    Algorithm—automated decision-making
    Cloud—Internet
    Crypto—cryptocurrency
    Dark web—Onion service
    Data science—statistics done by nonstatisticians
    Disruption—competition
    Viral—popular
    IoT—malware-ready device

    — Arvind Narayanan (@random_walker) March 22, 2018

  98. 98.

    Jay

    @tobie:

    There’s no shortage of self taught coders who have had huge impacts with no formal degree’s.

    Our two “go to” tech guys, are a Journalism and Marketing major, and his younger autistic brother, who’s studying acting. Neither of them has taken a Computer course or math course outside of High School.

    Both are self taught coders, and the younger one writes FPS Japanese Monster Anime games for his own amusement, in Japanese.

  100. 100.

    Adam L Silverman

    @Raoul: The British justice system is not going to take this lightly. I am also sure that both Special Counsel Mueller and NY State AG Schneiderman are also paying close attention to all of this, including the stuff involving the Mercers and their money.

  103. 103.

    Adam L Silverman

    Apparently Fox News discovered a stable wormhole back to the mid 1990s:

  104. 104.

    ? ?? Goku (aka Amerikan Baka) ? ?

    @Adam L Silverman:
    Wouldn’t that be something? If there was evidence of foreign tampering in elections going back to 2010. That would invalidate most of the GOP gains made…everywhere. No wonder they’re doing ostrich impersonations.

  108. 108.

    Another Scott

    @Amir Khalid: Hey, cut me a break! I’m still sick!! (But was better today – well enough to return to work.)

    Maybe it could better be described as “Passive Trump”, perhaps?

    ;-p

    Thanks.

    Cheers,
    Scott.

  110. 110.

    Jay

    @Major Major Major Major:

    It’s not a comparison of their brilliance, it’s the fact that both seem to have “oh, fuck, what have I done!” moments right after the big reveal.

    Just like the AI guys are going to have their own Oppenheimer Effect.

  111. 111.

    Adam L Silverman

    @? ?? Goku (aka Amerikan Baka) ? ?: Those are the claims that have come out in Cadwalladr’s and Channel 4’s reporting on Cambridge Analytica over the past week or so. From the follow up reporting it appears that Cambridge Analytica was retained by a number of GOP campaigns and conservative Super PACs, almost all of them who were being heavily funded by the Mercers, going back to 2010. So you have the foreign influence/foreigners working in/on behalf of US candidates and campaigns for the better part of a decade. This is illegal. Then you have the related issue that it appears that the Mercers were using these donations to Republican campaigns and conservative Super PACs, which are tax deductible donations, to require these campaigns and super PACs to hire Cambridge Analytica, which is partially owned by the Mercers, thereby paying a Mercer owned company for campaign services. This looks an awful lot like a money laundering scheme to lower one’s tax burden at the state and Federal level. As well as to enrich oneself from the profits of Cambridge Analytica.

  124. 124.

    Adam L Silverman

    @Tom Q: This was, apparently, part of a set of talking points that were circulated today. The guy who runs Brent Bozell’s media watchdog group was tweeting about how come Wiley was never on 60 Minutes back in the day. This led Jake Tapper and several others to tweet the link to the Barbara Walters prime time interview with her. It’s like there’s one shop that coordinates messaging across the conservative movement, Fox News and talk radio, the White House, elected GOP officials in Congress. And that these messages often seem to be the exact same ones coming out of Russian state backed media like RT and Sputnik and amplified on social media by the Russian trolls and bots.

    It is a puzzlement!

  126. 126.

    jonas

    @Adam L Silverman: Juanita Brodderick? Paula Jones? Clinton sex? Why, I had never heard of those individuals or stories! Must be because the “mainstream media” forgot to cover them!

    FFS, he’s not even trying anymore.

    ETA — and if they want to go there, I’ll see his Paula Jones…and raise him an Anita Hill. Hm?

  127. 127.

    sukabi

    @Adam L Silverman: I’m getting some formatting issues in your post…starting at this point:

    clearly more to Wylie, or rather the story that is Wylie, than what he is promoting as the righteous whistle blower against Cambridge Analytica, SCL, Aggregate IQ (AIQ), UKIP, various pro-Brexit front groups, numerous GOP campaigns and conservative Super PACs, Steve Bannon, and the Mercers. Tonight’s revelations, however, provide greater clarity to our understanding of just what Cambridge Analytica was and who it was connected to.
    Finally, tomorrow should be a wild ride in Britain:

    I get a small blue box on the left with the bit about more to Wylie…most of the blockquoted stuff isn’t showing up, although I can copy & paste it.

    Formatting issues continue thru the rest of the post.

    Mobile android, adblocker browser,…

    It’s the first post today that’s been borked. ☺

  128. 128.

    Yarrow

    Thanks for this thread. Can’t wait to connect with the folks I know in the UK who even as late as December were telling me I was wrong and that Russia had nothing to do with the Brexit vote. The one I really need to talk to, who was completely despondent after the Brexit vote, is on a week long holiday and I can’t reach him. Oh, well. It can wait. The story will probably be even more interesting by the time he gets back!

  129. 129.

    Adam L Silverman

    @sukabi: It’s not showing up on my desktop (MacBook Pro with up to date Chrome and Safari – looks fine in both) or my iPad (Safari, also up to date). I did have to reformat that section during drafting. When I closed the quotation offset, WP’s dashboard compressed everything, which it sometimes does. Once I reformatted it back to “paragraph” it appeared fine for me in preview of the post, as well as in the final post on my MacBook and iPad. I don’t know why WP does this. It seems almost random. I can do a week’s worth of post without it doing it at all when I end a quotation indent/offset. And then it will just suddenly do it for a couple of posts at a time. Alain is aware of the issue and investigating it.

  130. 130.

    SFAW

    @Adam L Silverman:

    It’s not for nothing that he’s earned the nickname “The Stupidest Person on TV.”

    I guess we should be glad that he wasn’t including an expose (MUST CREDIT DRUDGE!!!!!) of Hitlary’s murder of poor Vince Foster. In the West Wing. With the Candlestick. And then she dragged his corpse to the copse in Fort Marcy Park.

    I keep hoping that he’ll suffer the same fate as Grunthos the Flatulent, but alas! It is not to be.

  132. 132.

    Amir Khalid

    @Raoul:
    As a pedant, I get just a little ticked off when a sentence that describes someone being passive is mistakenly called a sentence in the passive voice. People, those are two completely different things!

  134. 134.

    Steeplejack

    @dm:

    Channel 4 is not part of the BBC.

    Channel 4 is a publicly owned and commercially funded U.K. public service broadcaster, with a statutory remit to deliver high-quality, innovative, alternative content that challenges the status quo.

    Channel 4 was set up with a unique model as a “publisher-broadcaster,” meaning that we do not have any in-house production, but instead commission content from production companies throughout the U.K.

  135. 135.

    Amir Khalid

    If all this leads to Theresa May’s downfall as Tory leader and PM, who from the Conservatives’ clown-car leadership is going to succeed her? She is in the jobn only because she was somehow the last one left standing in the party’s post-Brexit circular firing squad.

  137. 137.

    Mnemosyne

    @Adam L Silverman:

    From the follow up reporting it appears that Cambridge Analytica was retained by a number of GOP campaigns and conservative Super PACs, almost all of them who were being heavily funded by the Mercers, going back to 2010.

    Well, this can’t possibly be true, because it would mean that all of the trolls who have been whining about the feckless Democrats having a losing message would be wrong. //

  139. 139.

    Jay

    @Amir Khalid:

    ”
    The great achievement, and the great lie, of the Leave campaign was to make voting leave mean all things to all people. It could mean soft or hard Brexit; liberal or illiberal Brexit; Nativist or Globalist Brexit; a vote against the neo-Communist ‘EUSSR’ or against neo-liberal Capitalism. As a vote-winning strategy, that got Leave over the line – just. Since then, the chickens of ambiguity have come home to roost. That’s most obvious in the still ongoing conflict over soft versus hard Brexit. But the passports and fisheries rows expose the nativist-globalist dimension of the dishonesty. What is politically important now, in the very few months left, is whether leave voters come to see that all the contradictory things they were promised cannot and never will come true. And, if they do, who they will decide to blame”

    http://chrisgreybrexitblog.blogspot.ca/2018/03/the-passport-and-fishing-rows-expose.html?m=1

  140. 140.

    Mnemosyne

    @Mary G:
    @Steeplejack:

    G has already watched it twice. (No, seriously!) It’s very good.

    However, note that the stuff about “The Larry Sanders Show” is in part two, which doesn’t air until tomorrow. The firat half is his early career, “The Tonight Show,” and “It’s Garry Shandling’s Show.”

  143. 143.

    Mrs. D. Ranged in AZ

    @Jay: I started out in customer support but the coders didn’t roll in until noon AZ time. Our customers were on the East Coast and the app was law enforcement related. The time gap and lack of urgency on their part was maddening. So I started debugging their FoxPro code and SQL queries and would make them fix the error as soon as they came in. After a while I started fixing their errors and then I said, screw it, and went out on my on as a programmer for hire.

  144. 144.

    Steeplejack

    @Mrs. D. Ranged in AZ:

    I loved FoxPro! That last MS-DOS version, before Windows (and before acquisition by Microsoft?) was the bomb for in-the-trenches database and SQL development. Good times.

    Self-taught programmer here too. Degree in journalism. Worked in marketing at a company that did some of the first products for the IBM PC (1981). Got pissed because I could never get any of our developers to do in-house apps for us, so I learned programming myself, starting with dBASE II, and progressed from there. Left that company when it was acquired (and run into the ground) by a bigger company and moved over to software development for most of the rest of my checkered career.

  146. 146.

    Jay

    @Mrs. D. Ranged in AZ:

    Yup, at my Company they borked the ERP installation, ( twice) used fields for some types of data that wern’t meant to be used for that data, and whole modules not for their intended purpose. So the canned reports were borked, and sometimes “you couldn’t get there from here”. Subsequent upgrades and new versions just got more and more borked.

    At my next Company, yup Baan was borked, mostly because the Consultant’s hired to manage the install, were the same cluster of morons,

    Next Company, Baan was borked too, same Consultants, who had assured them that the Engineers didn’t have to use Baan. So, as a Engineer to Order Company, we had to do “everything twice”, once manual, once in the ERP system.

  151. 151.

    Steeplejack

    @Major Major Major Major:

    That last version (mid-’90s) was a great development system. Easy hookup to all sorts of database formats, big and small, including the then new (to microcomputers) SQL, and FoxPro’s native database was pretty good.

    The two things I loved the most were:

    ♦ The line-by-line debugger. Standard DOS screens were 80 characters by 25 lines, but there was a “special” 80-by-50 mode you could invoke. It looked like crap—tiny text—but it allowed you to see your code in the bottom half and run it line by line or to break points, while seeing the results—the program’s user interface—in the upper 80-by-25 “window.” F’mazeballs. Really cut down on development time.

    ♦ The built-in SQL interpreter. FoxPro always had a command-line interface to dick around with reports and tables, etc., and the last few versions had a pretty complete SQL interpreter under the hood. I went from zero to SQL meister in an incredibly short time. “Okay, that was an inner join . . . that was a reverse boar-hog outer join . . . and that—oh, yeah, I just stepped on my dick.”

    It took years to get a development system that good anywhere in the Windows zone. And, believe me, I looked.

    Thanks for indulging my geezer reminiscence.

  152. 152.

    Anne Laurie

    @John Revolta: Nah, that was me — I pulled my own post because I decided it wasn’t worth it. (Unless, of course, the foodfight escalates overnight.)

  153. 153.

    Steeplejack

    Food fight? I had extremely good chicken egg foo yung for dinner from my second-favorite Chinese restaurant (Hunan Village). My favorite Chinese restaurant (Fortune) doesn’t do egg foo yung. When I asked about it once they went all food Nazi on me and suspended me for a month. Maybe ’cause they’re Cantonese? Dunno.

  154. 154.

    joel hanes

    @Jay:

    There’s no shortage of self taught coders who have had huge impacts with no formal degree

    or a non-ComSci degree.

    Bill Gates prominent among them — self-taught, and boy does it show in MS/DOS and Windows up to 98 SE.
    Microsoft had so little familiarity with the state of the programmer’s art that they had to hire from Digital Equipment a bunch of the guys who did VAX/VMS to do the first Microsoft attempt at an actual “Windows”-branded operating system, Windows NT. Barely usable. NT begat Windows 2000 – usable but really really slow. Win 2000 begat Windows XP, the first acceptable operating system MS ever produced.

    Real computer companies had been offering real operating systems (with real support) for at least 30 years at the time that Win XP was released. Much had been long known about what was to be done, and how to do it right. The early MS Windows products simply ignored most of what was known.

    OTOH, had the MSFT founders been technically competent, I suppose that they’d probably not been audacious enough to sell IBM the rights to a floppy-disk system monitor that they didn’t exactly own quite yet. Fortune favors the bold, and as Joey Ramone remarked, “Lack of skill dictates economy of style.”

  157. 157.

    Steeplejack

    @joel hanes:

    You have to remember that the computers running MS-DOS, and even the first versions of Windows, were extremely underpowered by today’s standards—less than toys today. So the operating systems were constrained and pared way down. But a lot of stuff got done.

    And OS/2 was a pretty good OS, but it never caught on. Somewhat deliberately, perhaps. (Weird politics between Microsoft and IBM.)

  158. 158.

    ?BillinGlendaleCA

    @joel hanes: NT 4 was actually pretty robust. The problem earlier versions of Win/NT had was that they placed the graphics at kernel level and a bad driver could really ruin your day(and night). Having the graphics out of the kernel made things a bit slower, but really increased reliability.

  162. 162.

    joel hanes

    @Steeplejack:@Steeplejack:

    OS/2 was a pretty good OS, but it never caught on.

    Microsoft, the brilliant business strategy company, knifed IBM, the technological mother of us all, right in the back.
    Twice.
    As they knifed every other company that partnered with MSFT before Gates got married.

  163. 163.

    Chet Murthy

    @?BillinGlendaleCA: Well, you know why they did it, right? NT started with the graphics driver outside the kernel. But was unacceptably slow. So they moved it inside. Of course, by that time X-windows had been running for years and years (since 1986) and on the same hardware, without problems and quite snappily …. with the graphics server outside the kernel.

    Those Real Geniuses at MSFT. Feh. Also, the first Intel machine that Win3.11 worked acceptably on was the 386. Which ran BSD Unix (and X-windows) like a champ. There’s a reason that one of the standard ways of taking an underpowered old machine and making it usable again, was to install Linux on it: b/c Windows sucked like a gaping chest wound – fat, slow, buggy.

  166. 166.

    Steeplejack

    @joel hanes:

    As they knifed every other company that partnered with MSFT before Gates got married.

    No argument here. I think every major product they ever had was bought or (discreetly) stolen from someone else.

  167. 167.

    Chet Murthy

    @joel hanes: Eh,I worked at IBM 1995-2013. I saw IBM completely fuck up OS/2[*]. They had this insane project to port it to run on PowerPC as a task under (wait for it) Mach! Insanity. Sheer insanity. I could go on and on about the ridiculous designs & even -worse politics they had for everything including their version of Microsoft COM. It was all ridiculous. IBM wasted billions of dollars in labs all around the world (I was helping guys debug code in Germany from my office in NY), and by the time they woke up and decided to cut their losses (they put out a “Limited Availability” release — press one DVD, stick it in a safe, spin the dial, and burn the combo; if the customer can guess the combo, they can buy the product *grin*) MSFT had complete dominance of the desktop, which wouldn’t change until Apple and Linux rose up.

    Yeah, MSFT were assholes. But IBM was very, very busy gutting itself like a fish.

    [*] And I the above, noting that I *hate* OS/2. I used to call it OS/Lose. B/c I’m an old-skool UNIX jock. Period. Notwithstanding, IBM completely fucked that up.

  169. 169.

    kattails

    Couple of days ago I was heading home when a very large, fancy SUV approached from the opposite direction, blinker on. I realized it was turning onto the driveway to the Mercer’s hilltop compound. I debated on whether to roll down the window and display an upraised middle finger, but not quite fast enough. Was this thought childish? (The hesitation was probably rational, they have armed guards.)

  170. 170.

    Chet Murthy

    @?BillinGlendaleCA: I have no quibble with Windows & DOS on pre-386 hardware. Xenix & freres barely worked there. But my point really is, that with the 386, you had hardware capable of running an OS that was immune to BSOD — so no process could cause another process to die by stray memory diddling. And so, BSD ran like a champ. But MSFT still managed to make that BSOD-loving Win3.11. BTW, at the same time, Apple OS9 was “one big address-space, using no memory-management hardware”, and they were markedly more stable than Win3.11.

  182. 182.

    Chet Murthy

    @joel hanes: *Precisely*. And *yet* Macs running OS9 were routinely more stable running multiple unrelated apps, for long, long periods of time (days and says) than Win3.11 was. That’s really my point — even though it was “we’re all nekkid here”, it was quite robust and stable.

  186. 186.

    Chet Murthy

    @?BillinGlendaleCA: @joel hanes: *grin* Oh, the perennial argument! I prefer markup languages (LaTeX, pls) but hey, I get that most humans can’t grok it.

    ETA: and regardless of how much we try to convince ’em, they never will.

  188. 188.

    Chet Murthy

    @?BillinGlendaleCA: Running OSX? Or are you referring to “back in the day on OS9”? My sis once told me that her OSX Mac was … quite unstable. Which I found surprising, b/c after all it’s BSD-on-Mach at the bottom. I run Linux on my lappie and only ever reboot when it’s time for a kernel upgrade. Been that way for 20yr on lappie-after-lappie. So the instability in OSX these days is ….. surprising to an old UNIX head.

  190. 190.

    Steeplejack

    @?BillinGlendaleCA:

    WordPerfect came out in ’82. I don’t remember how good it was in ’83. There was a period of about a year somewhere in there when they had a lot of upgrades and the program improved exponentially.

    I just remember DOS Word as being criminally slow.

    And I can’t believe we’re talking about minutiae from 35 years ago. How do you feel about ham radio?

  197. 197.

    ?BillinGlendaleCA

    @Chet Murthy: You could always ID the CS majors at UCLA by the boxes of punch cards they carried around. The punch card machines didn’t usually have fresh ribbons on them, so you couldn’t read the text at the top. I saw one girl drop her box of cards during a Santa Ana wind, she just sat on the curb and cried.

    ETA: If you did drop your card deck you had to run it though the reader and get a listing so you could re-order your cards.

  198. 198.

    patrick II

    If we are going to talk about old time desktop operating systems — Amiga running on the Motorola 6800 was light years ahead of dos. It actually could open windows (I think 32 of them) and had 4800 colors, and the graphics were great for their time. Amigas were even used for graphics on the early Babylon 5.

  199. 199.

    joel hanes

    @?BillinGlendaleCA:

    I saw one girl drop her box of cards

    hand-numbered in pencil in decimal so you could always interpolate was the Only Safe Way to deal with cards.
    I did all my ComSci data structures courses on cards in PL/1.
    Wasn’t until I learned C that I actually grokked pointers.

  201. 201.

    different-church-lady

    @?BillinGlendaleCA: Didn’t they have a trick where they ran a marker diagonally across the tops of the cards? Seem to remember that. We used to do it with slides too.

  202. 202.

    Chet Murthy

    @patrick II: Uh, 68000, yes? real 32-bit machine. Though didn’t have support for page-faults, so you couldn’t actually get virtual memory. But it was a real machine, yeap.

  203. 203.

    joel hanes

    @different-church-lady:

    BASIC on punch tape.

    My first programming course. Math 405, elective, “Numerical methods in computation”, taught by a math adjunct.
    BASIC on actual teletypes, with MVS/TSO on the other end.

  204. 204.

    Mike in DC

    The obvious question, if the legitimacy of the vote is now dubious, is why not have a do-over? Leave would likely lose in a fair contest, seems to me. Alternatively Parliament could vote on whether or not to proceed.

  205. 205.

    different-church-lady

    @joel hanes: Yeah, I think it was something like that. Definitely a teletype interface. I never even saw the actual computer — it was in another town at the regional vocational school!

  206. 206.

    joel hanes

    an unseemly dispute about vi vs. EMACS

    versus a seemly dispute ?

    The young programmers I work with now seem to want the “sublime” editor integrated into their IDE.
    It’s probably a good thing, but who can be bothered to switch editors ?

  208. 208.

    Steeplejack

    @joel hanes:

    Versus a seemly dispute?

    Touché.

    Sublime . . . hmm, interesting. I wonder what Major^4 uses as a text editor. For that matter, what do you use currently?

    I haven’t done any large-scale development in, jeez, 10 years.

  209. 209.

    Jay

    @Mike in DC:

    There won’t be a do over of the 2016 US Elections either.

    May’s Government is dominated by differing cliques of Brexiteer’s,

    and Brexit’s a mess because the Brexiteer’s are living in a bubble reality where anyone who grasps the difficulty, complexity and technical issues of a Brexit is derided as an elitist technocrat.

  210. 210.

    joel hanes

    what do you use currently?

    vi
    all features turned off: no auto-indent, no syntax coloring, nothing.
    flat ASCII As God Intended

    I haven’t thought about editing in decades.
    My fingers just do it, with indentation and bracing in the current local style
    on cards I was a three-indent
    much of my career was spent in four-indent
    where I’ve been for a decade it’s two-indent. Your eyes adjust.

    The editing is the easy part.
    The thinking is the hard part.

  211. 211.

    joel hanes

    @Steeplejack:

    Almost every problem can be solved with one more level of indirection.
    Correctly typed pointers in C, with judicious use of const, can be a lovely exercise in form.
    Ever look at the source for a linking loader for ELF32 ?

  212. 212.

    Steeplejack

    @joel hanes:

    I was mostly a four-indent guy. Two doesn’t seem like enough.

    @joel hanes:

    Systems-level buggery. I was (am) an applications guy. High priority on readable and maintainable code, not so much on lovely exercises in form.

  213. 213.

    joel hanes

    readable and maintainable code, not so much on lovely exercises in form.

    I would argue that in the best code, these measures do not pose a tradeoff,
    given decent identifiers and a design-intent comment or two,
    the lovely exercises in form are often the most readable and maintainable.
    BOOK 4 : Coding
    Thus spake the Master Programmer:
    “A well-written program is its own Heaven; a poorly-written program is its own Hell.”
    4.1 A program should be light and agile, its subroutines connected like a string of pearls. The spirit and intent of the program should be retained throughout. There should be neither too little nor too much. Neither needless loops nor useless variables; neither lack of structure nor overwhelming rigidity.
    A program should follow the “Law of Least Astonishment”. What is this law? It is simply that the program should always respond to the users in the way that least astonishes them.
    A program, no matter how complex, should act as a single unit. The program should be directed by the logic within rather than by outward appearances.
    If the program fails in these requirements, it will be in a state of disorder and confusion. The only way to correct this is to rewrite the program.

  214. 214.

    patrick II

    @Chet Murthy:

    Yes, 68000, not 6800. Another nice thing is that it had its video card separate — a novelty in the day. If I was investing I would have invested in the machine that had windows and colors and a mouse and better graphics that the four colored dos machine. Which is why I don’t do well in the market.

  217. 217.

    cosima

    There’s a case to be made for the Mercers being some of the most evil people in the world, imo. As someone above rightfully notes, it appears as though all of this messing about in politics was with the intention of acquiring more money. Why? Don’t they already have more than they can possibly spend in their lifetimes? Their sheen of respectability, and disavowing certain acts makes them worse. Putin has always been a venal & corrupt & dangerous man with very clear aims that he telegraphed to the world. The Mercers have been shadow people for most of us, and not unmasked until recently. I’d never heard of them before this election, but they’d been adversely affecting my life (and the lives of billions of others) for years, if not decades.

    I’m not angry with FB about sharing my data — I’ve never been so naïve as to think that my online presence &/or data was sacrosanct &/or private. Everything we do that is connected to the internet is available to someone, somewhere, if they want it badly enough. Mr C had a security expert do a ‘dark web’ presentation at work, and he said it was illuminating and terrifying — that was years ago. I’m angry about how they shared the data, their carelessness in following up on the data that they knew had been illegally acquired and shared, their blatant lying, etc. People have died over this, and, if the current squatter in the WH & his enablers & staff have their way, millions of people may die due to war, famine, lack of access to health care, etc — in the US, the UK, in every corner of the world. That is why I’ll delete my FB page. Breach of trust, my arse. It’s so much bigger than that. Let the heads roll.

    I’m still waiting to see what the headlines say about this here in the UK, how long before there’s a call for a second Brexit referendum. When the poisonings happened I commented here asking if Putin had overplayed his hand with that sloppiness. Unintentionally or intentionally. Warning shot or mistake? Hard to say, but at the same time this CA stuff is shoring up resistance to Putin and anything that might be perceived as supporting his aims, directly or indirectly. I hope it gets a lot noisier here, and that they get a bit rowdy by British standards.

  218. 218.

    Jay

    @Amir Khalid:

    Some are, but most still havn’t figured out what Brexit “means”, what the EU does, or what the UK’s membership in the EU consisted of.

  220. 220.

    cosima

    @Jay: Some may hope that’s the case, but it’s ugly enough, and Brexit unpopular enough, for it to happen. We’ll see.

  221. 221.

    cosima

    @Amir Khalid: And if they won fair & square they won’t mind having another vote to underscore that point.

    One of the issues, similar to that of the US, is that if you don’t fully investigate and explore the issue, and the integrity of the vote, the process, you leave yourself vulnerable to future attacks. Who is determining the future of the country — its voters, or some billionaires &/or evil autocrats/plutocrats (not mutually exclusive)? Here in the UK we may have voting levels that are pathetic, similar to that of the US, but for those who can be bothered to vote, I do think there’s a belief in the process that is slightly great than exists in the US. Apart from Brexit and the Indy ref, there really are not the unbridgeable political chasms similar to those that exist in the US. Whether one supports Labor or Tories, or Green, there is a belief in the social contract by all save the deplorables of the UK (to use Hillary’s term — not as a classist term); it is only the most racist/xenophobic/etc of the citizens here who would burn it all down, whereas in the US you see there are about 30% of folk who are quite happy to see it all burn to the ground if it means they can have their guns/pro-life stance/immigrant-bashing/etc.

  222. 222.

    Jay

    @cosima:

    May’s Coelition consists of varying shades of Brexiteers, ranging from the merely deluded, to the batshit crazy.

    Labour hasn’t taken a position.

    The Remainer’s knew what was happening, a handful of Leaver’s have since changed their minds,

    But most Leaver’s are wallowing in ignorance.

    https://jonworth.eu/lemons-and-landing-rights-the-uks-relations-with-the-rest-of-the-world-post-brexit-is-the-issue-that-cannot-be-kicked-into-the-transition-period/

  224. 224.

    Jay

    @cosima:

    While the Leaver’s in the UK hold to a less racist racism, they cling to their ignorance as hard and fast as the Deplorables. “Immigration” was and still is a big issue for Leavers, but they were/are too ignorant to understand that the UK wasn’t part of the Schenigen Area, that the UK’s Parliement fully controlled legal Immigration and Refugee’s under UK Law, and UK Border Services was responsible for manageing illegal Immigration.

  225. 225.

    cosima

    @Jay: I live here in the UK, so I am following the Brexit issue quite closely, and have had many discussions about it. Many. Some with leavers. Had a long one this weekend, actually. Related to how horrible May is, how awful the Tories are, etc., will things stay the same, or will they finally change, and how to get more people voting. As with the Mueller investigation on the US side, this far from over. I think the CA revelations have pushed Brexit that much further away, and I would not be surprised if what comes out of the CA story will push either a second referendum, or a vote blocking it, but that will not happen until everything comes out — and that may take much longer than we’d like. I’d personally hoped we’d somehow have a magical resolution of the Putin’s puppet issue before Jan 21, 2017, and yet here we are, over a year into his reign of terror, and Mueller still working away building his case(s), and the orange fart cloud still squatting in the WH, while horrible things happen specifically because he’s in place. There will be no immediate gratification on either side of the pond, but none of us have any idea what other revelations are in store.

  226. 226.

    cosima

    @Jay: I agree, but they are not a large part of the citizenry. They are fringe, and treated/viewed as such by a huge majority. Even many of the ‘leavers’ — a lot of those who voted ‘leave’ thought they were doing so for sound economic reasons (that of course turned out to be total bullshyt), and are not virulent racists &/or nutjobs. Particularly here in Scotland. Boris may find himself again a pariah — fingers crossed — over this. As I said — it’s the long game at this point.

    And, as I’m on a quite different time schedule than most BJ folk, it’s now time for me to get the dog out for her walk, and get on with the productive part of the day before Little C comes home from school.

    To end on a positive note (and given that there’s no open thread up as yet) — I’ve been combing through my likes/saves on my FB page in prep for deletion (time-consuming, but has been productive — I saved a lot of great stuff), and got off on a music tangent, which led me to some excellent non-FB places for music. So, my new music channel discoveries (I’ve already shared Mahogany Sessions here, and if you haven’t already gone there, do it!) are the youtube channels MOSTLY Strings (which is perhaps called that because a lot of the songs are acoustic? it’s not string music), and SleepMusic. I had to buy a lot of new music last night after stumbling on those.

  227. 227.

    Jay

    @cosima:

    Pete North, a pro-Brexit blogger, once upon a time, isn’t even mentioning Anal, the Mercers or Putin.

    “Ultimately we wanted this revolution and now we’ve got it. What we end up with really all depends on what we say and do now – and choosing allies with care. Right now all we’re doing is handing the keys to the country to the disaster capitalists on the Tory back benches and their useful idiots in the Westminster bubble. I guarantee you that is not the Brexit any of us voted for.”

    http://peterjnorth.blogspot.ca/2018/03/the-london-brexit-luvvies-need-to-grow.html?m=1

    768 Regulatory and Trade agreements that effect the UK are through the EU, most Leaver’s don’t know, don’t care, are too lazy to look it up, and don’t know that all that trade stops, March 19, 2019.

    They voted to leave the EU with no idea what the EU did or what it was, other than it was European and “responsible” for everything “wrong” in the UK, from the appearance of curry take out to the closing of coal mines.

    They arn’t going to get any smarter or more engaged when their pensions get cut, the NHS get’s privatized, or their kids flee abroad.

  228. 228.

    cosima

    @Jay: Again — that is a small percentage of the citizenry/electorate. Many who voted to leave (and yes, I know some) voted for delusional magic economic reasons, and have since seen how they were manipulated. There was a lot of scary NHS talk that drove many voters, and that has since been outed/debunked. The hard-core deplorable Breixteers are not as numerous as the deplorables in the US (proportionately). The fight is not over. Been good discussing with you!

  229. 229.

    Barry

    @Gvg: “So the guy blowing the whistle now was in the past pushing the bad behavior? I need a score card. Always had a bad memory for names.”

    There is a distinct shortage of saints who just happened to be walking by at the right time and place to witness bad behavior…

  232. 232.

    Anonymous At Work

    NEW NARRATIVE: Nationalism cannot win legally

    That needs to be promoted, if not the least to get under Trump’s skin. At most, this would reinforce the disdain for the Rule of Law that nationalists feel and fuel the counterinsurgency. Linking this to gerrymandering by state leges would also be beneficial, especially if Justice Weathervane Kennedy decides that his legacy is better served.

  234. 234.

    No Drought No More

    “… they apparently panicked because “This was the first campaign they’d worked on where they couldn’t leave the country immediately afterwards”.

    Fun fact: before they found work with Analytica, the pair were monorail salesman.

  235. 235.

    schrodingers_cat

    I am surprised that people here are surprised that British politics is run like a criminal cabal. Surely they didn’t control a global empire by being angels. This is who they are and always were. The veneer of civilization is just that, a veneer.

  236. 236.

    Glidwrith

    @Mary G: Saw the Saudi propaganda in the Von’s here in San Diego and pointed it out to my little dragonet as such.

  241. 241.

    moops

    Given that Brexit, and the Trump election both benefit an ascendant USSR, and enable domestic fascist uprisings, it is easy to understand the common cause and alliances at work here.

Comments are closed.