• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Books are my comfort food!

Yeah, with this crowd one never knows.

Technically true, but collectively nonsense

“Just close your eyes and kiss the girl and go where the tilt-a-whirl takes you.” ~OzarkHillbilly

Usually wrong but never in doubt

In my day, never was longer.

“The defense has a certain level of trust in defendant that the government does not.”

Washington Post Catch and Kill, not noticeably better than the Enquirer’s.

I might just take the rest of the day off and do even more nothing than usual.

Republicans don’t lie to be believed, they lie to be repeated.

Well, whatever it is, it’s better than being a Republican.

Not rolling over. fuck you, make me.

I’m starting to think Jesus may have made a mistake saving people with no questions asked.

When we show up, we win.

The media handbook says “controversial” is the most negative description that can be used for a Republican.

GOP baffled that ‘we don’t care if you die’ is not a winning slogan.

People are weird.

We can show the world that autocracy can be defeated.

There are more Russians standing up to Putin than Republicans.

Radicalized white males who support Trump are pitching a tent in the abyss.

Bark louder, little dog.

Democracy cannot function without a free press.

When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty. ~Thomas Jefferson

If you voted for Trump, you don’t get to speak about ethics, morals, or rule of law.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Archives for Books / When Everything Changed

When Everything Changed

The Fall Of The White Male Novelist

by Cheryl Rofer|  April 29, 20219:40 am| 260 Comments

This post is in: Books, The War On Women, When Everything Changed

Publishers have a lot of power. Written material shapes thinking and conversations. When they choose a book or article, they are using physical and mental space that might have gone elsewhere.

For many, many years in the English-speaking countries, that space has gone to white cis men, excluding other voices. Compounding the exclusion has been misogyny in many of those men’s writing.

I gave up reading fiction a long time ago. It was all men’s viewpoints. When Henry Miller’s Tropics became legal in the US, I read them. An older male colleague asked me what I thought. I don’t recall my exact response, but it was along the lines of  it being a viewpoint I didn’t recognize. And Norman Mailer and John Cheever and John Updike and Philip Roth and too many others.

The pretense was “Oh but they are such wonderful writers.” As recently as this week, I saw a woman tweeting how she loved Philip Roth’s sentences. I never could get to those sentences through the subject matter, which either didn’t interest me (men’s masturbatory fantasies) or was actively misogynist. Later fiction presented men’s fantasies about what people of color or women really thought. Women fiction writers too often picked up too much of the men’s influence. I tossed it all in the trash.

I’m encouraged by W. W. Norton’s decision to scrap Roth’s biography, written by his hand-picked biographer, who is now accused of inappropriate behavior toward his students and rape. Yes, I want to shout, of course the person Roth chose to represent him would be that way.

Ron Charles, in the Washington Post, points out that diversity at a publishing firm opens a route for non-cis-white-male viewpoints to go into those decisions about how that valuable print space will be allocated. The staff at Simon and Schuster has lodged an objection to the company’s signing a contract for a book by former Vice President Mike Pence. Supporting Nazis, it turns out, isn’t to everyone’s taste.

I suspect some major publishers still don’t understand what having a diverse workforce entails. It was never just about making your office look like a Benetton ad. The real goal behind a diverse workforce is a wide range of experiences and ideas — and people empowered to act on them.

Charles sees clearly what is happening. I’m pleased that my judgments are finally being validated.

Cross-posted to Nuclear Diner

The Fall Of The White Male NovelistPost + Comments (260)

On the Road and In Your Backyard

by Alain Chamot (1971-2020)|  September 20, 20185:00 am| 17 Comments

This post is in: On The Road, Open Threads, Readership Capture, When Everything Changed

Good Morning All,

On The Road and In Your Backyard is a weekday feature spotlighting reader submissions. From the exotic to the familiar, please share your part of the world, whether you’re traveling or just in your locality. Share some pictures and a narrative, let us see through your pictures and words. We’re so lucky each and every day to see and appreciate the world around us!

Submissions from commenters are welcome at tools.balloon-juice.com

Have a wonderful day, and enjoy today’s outstanding submission. It is a series of wonderful pictures that are part of a courageous and inspiring story.

—

I have a few more days of old content lined up and some new content – yay – but we need lots of new submissions for soon and for “rainy days” – get cracking!

Note – I’ve gotten a few submissions, so unless I’ve emailed you or you encountered an error, your contribution should show up soon. We’re hoping to improve things, so do give feedback – thank you so much!

Troubleshooting  We have an improved setup and plans for further development. I hope the new setup works as well for you as it has in testing, but should you have issues, please email [email protected] This new submission tool is one of many more we’ve got planned, and your feedback helps us craft them to your needs.

 

show full post on front page

Today, pictures from valued commenter Sister Golden Bear.

Before surgery, my traveling companion and I were able to spend the weekend in Bangkok for a some light sightseeing. When got in a little two late on Saturday to see the Grand Palace, but fortunately we were only three blocks from Wat Pho, one of the major temples in Thailand (and unlike the template complex at the Grand Palace) Wat Pho is still a working temples with monks living there.

Despite being only a 10 minute walk from the Grand Palace, it was surprisingly uncrowded and serene. The temple complex houses the largest collection of Buddha images in Thailand, including a 46 m long reclining Buddha, and also. houses a school of Thai medicine, and is also known as the birthplace of traditional Thai massage.

The garden was comparatively tranquil compared to the Grand Palace.

The temples has one of the largest collections of Buddhas in Thailand.

As well as numerous other interesting statues.

The Giant Buddha is impressively large, 46 meters long and 15 meters high.

The feet give you a better sense of scale.

From our hotel room we had a view of another icon sight, Wat Arun, (or temple of the dawn), although it’s much more scenic at sunset.

One last look at Wat Pho from our dinner on the hotel rooftop.

 

Sunday before surgery, we got a chance to see the Grand Palace in Bangkok, which also contains a temple complex, the Temple of the Emerald Buddha. Neither is actively inhabited these days and only used on ceremonial occasions.

Fierce statues are common on the grounds.

The general theme to the decor is “more is more” with generous helping of gold leaf and embedded mirrors that make the building shine brightly.

Elephants are a national symbol of Thailand and frequently seen in statues and amulets.

The breeze was good for keeping things temperate, not so good for selfies. Messy hair, don’t care.

When in doubt, add more gold leaf.

I liked the expressions of the numerous guardian statues.

 

Thank you so much Sister Golden Bear, I hope you are well, and do send us more when you can.

 

Travel safely everybody, and do share some stories in the comments, even if you’re joining the conversation late. Many folks confide that they go back and read old threads, one reason these are available on the Quick Links menu.

 

Submissions should be sent via the all-new form at https://tools.balloon-juice.com

 

Final note: I’m not currently manning the email address previously used as an alternate submission tool. Submissions I find there will be published over the next few months as I see fit; the form submissions are the primary content driver for now.

On the Road and In Your BackyardPost + Comments (17)

A Brief History of the Breakup of the Soviet Union

by Cheryl Rofer|  June 5, 20174:48 pm| 106 Comments

This post is in: Foreign Affairs, When Everything Changed

Last night, stinger asked for more information on the causes of the breakup of the Soviet Union. Here’s a short summary of my understanding, with some references, not all (sorry!) links.

The Soviet economic system was faltering from the sixties on. The First Secretaries during that period were slow-moving, sick, and in no way capable of innovating out of that situation. It may have been inherently impossible in any case. Manufacturing of anything but weapons never was a significant part of the economy, which depended on oil exports.

The Soviet Union was made up of 15 Union republics. Some of those republics became part of the Soviet Union after World War II but had fought civil wars for independence from the Russian empire during and after the Russian Revolution in 1917. The Baltic States in particular, but other republics as well, were not happy members of the Union. Moscow went through waves of Russification, in which the Russian language was forced on populations for which it was not native. Social restrictions sometimes accompanied the language crackdowns.

Most of the rest of the world refused to recognize the Baltic republics as part of the Soviet Union. Token embassies were maintained in Washington and London.

By the 1980s, even the Soviets were beginning to realize they had a problem. The arms race with the United States had been partly tamed by the SALT arms control agreements, but an intermediate-missile race was burning. Building armaments was bleeding money and industrial capacity out of the economy. Mikhail Gorbachev, a newcomer with promise, was made First Secretary in March 1985.

show full post on front page

Reactor #4 at Chernobyl blew up as a result of a poorly planned and executed safety experiment in April 1986, contaminating chunks of Ukraine and Belarus in particular. The secrecy and slowness of the Soviet system to respond convinced Gorbachev that something needed to be done quickly. That something included both industrial reform and increased transparency.

Industrial reform came first and was called perestroika. A little later came glasnost, openness. Opening up to criticism of industrial practices was necessary to build a better-working economy. Integrating that economy with the rest of the world after several decades of isolation was also necessary. Neither would be easy. Arguably, Gorbachev moved too fast, without sufficient planning.

Besides the republics, several countries were satellites of the Soviet Union: Poland, Czechoslovakia, Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania, and East Germany. Their governments were nominally independent, but in reality heavily directed from Moscow. With the Soviet Union, they made up the Warsaw Pact, a response to NATO. Hungary and Czechoslovakia had staged revolts in 1956 and 1968 but were harshly put down. Poland was engaged in a slow-motion revolt throughout the 1980s via the Solidarity organization, which had characteristics of both a labor organization and political party.

Political parties were banned within the Soviet Union, but once perestroika was announced, nationalists in the Baltic republics began organizing perestroika groups. For improving industry, they said, but those groups contained, deliberately, the seeds of political parties. The Baltic states had strong expatriate groups in Europe, the United States, Canada, and Australia that were willing to help.

Something that remains a mystery to me is how the Baltic republics managed to stack their Supreme Soviets with nationalists. But they did. After 1985, the Supreme Soviets began to legislate the primacy of local laws over Union laws, the legitimacy of national symbols like their flags, and eventually called themselves parliaments instead of Supreme Soviets. Demonstrations alternated with bursts of legislation. People were jailed.

Moscow had never bothered to understand what they called “the nationalities,” all those Soviet people who were not Russian. So the leadership missed a lot of what was going on in the satellites and republics. They paid more attention when secession was openly spoken of.

Gorbachev recognized that Moscow could no longer support the satellites, and their restlessness presaged a possible need for military action that he could not afford financially or in its public fallout. So in October 1989, he dissolved the Warsaw Pact and said that the satellites could go their own way in what he humorously called the Sinatra Doctrine. Additionally, he renounced the doctrine of proletarian revolution, which had underpinned Soviet expansionism.

Gorbachev felt that this, along with the Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty, would allow him to concentrate on reforming the Soviet economy. But he was not fully aware of the rebellions brewing in the republics.

In one of the internal moves toward reform, Boris Yeltsin was elected president of the Russian Federated Soviet Republic, the largest of the Soviet republics. Yeltsin spent time with Baltic politicians to learn their tactics. Discussions continued with the republics on their constitutional duties toward the Union. Lithuania declared independence in March 1990. Soviet militia were sent in. Estonia and Latvia had come up to the edge of independence legislatively, but did not declare. Lithuania cooled its rhetoric but did not repudiate the declaration. In January 1991, Gorbachev insisted that Lithuania repudiate the declaration, sent in the military, and fourteen civilians were killed.

In August, a group of former military officers who felt that Gorbachev must be overthrown to preserve the Union held him prisoner at a Crimean resort. Boris Yeltsin took advantage of this to look powerful in Moscow. The plotters were turned back. Estonia and Latvia took the opportunity to declare independence. Moscow sent troops to seize television towers in Tallinn and Vilnius, and a press building in Riga, but they were withdrawn after confrontations with civilians.

A conference among the leaders of the Russian, Belarusian, and Ukrainian republics in  Belarus produced a document dissolving the Soviet Union in early December. The remaining republics signed on, and the Soviet Union ended on December 25, 1991.

Was the missile race part of what took the Soviet Union down? It was one more straw in a succession of them. It played a part. But Ronald Reagan’s and Margaret Thatcher’s rhetoric was a much smaller part.

 

Reading:

Jack Matlock, Autopsy on an Empire.  Matlock was the US ambassador to the Soviet Union as it broke apart. His view tends to be Moscow-centric and shares the Kremlin’s vague point of view of the nationalities. But a good guide to what was going on in Moscow.

Anatol Lieven, The Baltic Revolution.  Probably the best book available on the Baltic republics/states as they broke away from the Soviet Union.

As I write this, I am realizing how much of my information has been gained piecemeal from various sources, mainly Estonian ones. I thought for a while about writing a book about the process in Estonia, and maybe I still should.

The Singing Revolution is a film about some of the history and the role of culture in Estonia’s revolution. I’m in the photo of the audience at the 2004 Song Festival, if you can find me! It has some footage of protests that I didn’t realize exists.

The Estonica encyclopedia has a number of helpful articles in its history section.

 

A Brief History of the Breakup of the Soviet UnionPost + Comments (106)

What Could a Mysterious U.S. Spy Know About the JFK Assassination?

by Cheryl Rofer|  May 23, 20177:21 pm| 236 Comments

This post is in: Domestic Politics, Open Threads, When Everything Changed

Records about June Cobb, an American spy in Cuba during the early 1960s, are to be released soon  (Politico) and apparently have some bearing on the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. She worked in Cuba and Mexico, apparently fairly close to Castro.

I am taking this with a grain of salt, but more information is always good. It was easy then for a female employee to be ignored. As you can see in the article, her attractiveness was part of the discussion. Looking forward to seeing what the documents have to say.

What we know about Cobb so far comes largely from millions of pages of other documents from the CIA, FBI and other federal agencies that were declassified years ago under the 1992 law. Within those documents are dozens of files that identified Cobb as a paid CIA operative when she worked on Castro’s staff in Havana and later when she moved to Mexico. Some of the documents tie her to a lingering questions about Oswald’s trip to Mexico City in late September 1963, not long before Kennedy’s November assassination. In Mexico, Oswald came under CIA surveillance when he met there with both Soviet and Cuban spies. Previously released documents also show Cobb’s involvement in CIA surveillance of a U.S.-based pro-Castro group, the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, which Oswald championed in the months before Kennedy’s murder.

There is one document about Cobb that has remained completely off-limits to the public all these years: the 221-page file identified as “FOLDER ON COBB, VIOLA JUNE (VOL VII)” on a skeletal index released by the Archives last year. It is one of the 3,600 documents that were withheld from public view entirely in the 1990s at the request of the agencies that originally produced them—in Cobb’s case, the CIA. The index prepared by the Archives shows that, as of 1998, when her file was last officially reviewed, the spy agency said the document was “not believed relevant” to the Kennedy assassination but could do unspecified harm if made public before the October 2017 deadline.

And open thread!

What Could a Mysterious U.S. Spy Know About the JFK Assassination?Post + Comments (236)

What’s All That Wet Stuff In My Eyes?

by Tom Levenson|  February 13, 20172:08 pm| 35 Comments

This post is in: Music, Open Threads, When Everything Changed, Rare Sincerity

I just watched this, and I can’t quite explain why my vision went all damp and blurry for a moment there:

This one rings across so many of the changes being played right now.  I won’t rabbit on about them; I think the film speaks for itself far better than any commentary could.

But I will say that it made me feel moved, sad, redeemed, and reminded of what’s worth fighting for in the here and now.

And with that…over to y’all.

What’s All That Wet Stuff In My Eyes?Post + Comments (35)

Sort of Maybe a Bit Like Friday Recipe Exchange on Monday: Do NOT Try This at Home Edition!!!!!

by Adam L Silverman|  March 28, 20165:21 pm| 87 Comments

This post is in: Cooking, Crock Pot Craziness, Education, Food, Science & Technology, When Everything Changed, Someone Somewhere Is Having More Fun Than I Am, THIS WAS AWESOME

Alton Brown has been tinkering again. He’s invented a way to make ice cream in under 10 seconds. The video is below. Whatever you do, do not try this at home!

Bon appetit! And open thread.

Sort of Maybe a Bit Like Friday Recipe Exchange on Monday: Do NOT Try This at Home Edition!!!!!Post + Comments (87)

Withdrawal for a too small company

by David Anderson|  July 28, 20146:42 am| 40 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance, C.R.E.A.M., When Everything Changed

An insurer in New York state that offered plans for 2014 will not be on the 2015 Exchange:

American Progressive Life & Health Insurance Company of New York has become the first company to withdraw from the New York State Health Exchange after failing to file a 2015 rate proposal.

The company, also known as Today’s Options of New York, operated in 37 counties across New York State, but only 384 people signed up for its plans [emphasis mine]under the first year of the Affordable Care Act….

h/t ACA Signups

Size matters a lot, and Today’s Options was too small to be even laughed at.  Why is this a good business decision?

384 people are too few people for an insurance company to offer a commercial or commercial like product for two significant reasons.  Either reason is a good enough reason for a company to get out of this market segment.

The first reason is that insurance companies are group size queens:

Actuaries and underwriters love large groups.  The bigger the better. Small groups and individuals are almost impossible to accurately price.  Big groups allow statistical approximations to approach population realities while the error bars on a small group are massive.  Massive error bars make underwriters and actuaries cry…

A large group smooths out the random noise and makes the cost of covering the sick lower due to both lower administrative costs and lower variance costs.

384 people in a single risk pool is an inadequate risk pool unless there is massive and costly reinsurance on the back-end.  At this point, a fully insured group of this size could see the risk pool blow up if there is one more drunk driver than projected, if there is one more conversation that ends in “Hold my beer and watch this”, if there is one more cancer diagnosis than projected.  An unexpected $350,000 claim is a massive miss.  A risk pool of 5,000 or even better 100,000 people in it can absorb a little claims noise far better than a risk pool of 384 people.

Secondly, preparation to file for a new plan year is expensive as hell.  I was intimately involved in filing Mayhew Insurance’s 2015 options, and I would guess that this effort was at least 35 man years where most of those man years are not cheap man years. Our filing was complex. Filing a single basic plan design at different metal levels which is what it looks like Today’s Options did in 2014 is a simpler task but it will still eat up several man years to prepare a comprehensive filing.

Mayhew Insurance could afford to invest the time and manpower in the filings for two reasons. First, we have an enrollment base to cover the costs. Secondly, we’re historically a general services insurer and a long term chunk of the strategy is to be able to play in all levels of the market.  Taking a short term loss may be acceptable.  Today’s Options is fundamentally a Medicare Advantage company with low margins and it was attempting to make a quick play for a virgin market.  Butting its collective head against the wall while losing money is not a good idea for a secondary line of business.

Since there were only 384 members with an allowable administrative overhead of 20% which has to cover everything, filing costs and regulatory compliance expenses most likely overwhelmed Today’s Options’ cost structure.

From a policy point of view, unpopular and comparatively expensive plans exiting the marketplace is a good thing in states with deep markets and significant participation.  It sucks that 384 people will need to find new policies next but they are highly likely to get better and cheaper policies instead.  Most insurers are using 2014 as a beta test year, and some insurers will figure out that the test failed, so we should expect to see insurers with minimal enrollment leave the markets.

Withdrawal for a too small companyPost + Comments (40)

  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Go to page 4
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Image by GB in the HC (5/23)

Recent Comments

  • Ruckus on Why Raw Story (and other outlets) Make Me Crazy (May 23, 2025 @ 1:55pm)
  • lifeinthebonusround on Why Raw Story (and other outlets) Make Me Crazy (May 23, 2025 @ 1:55pm)
  • Baud on Why Raw Story (and other outlets) Make Me Crazy (May 23, 2025 @ 1:55pm)
  • jonas on Why Raw Story (and other outlets) Make Me Crazy (May 23, 2025 @ 1:54pm)
  • PatD on Why Raw Story (and other outlets) Make Me Crazy (May 23, 2025 @ 1:52pm)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc