Anybody who’s not math-challenged want to look at this article and tell me if it’s A Thing? Nathaniel Downes at Addicting Info claims “PROOF: GOP Party Bosses Rigging Elections For Romney“:
The internet has been abuzz since the British website UK Progressive released a report on how a retired NSA analyst Michael Duniho had gone over the Arizona GOP Primary Results from earlier this year and discovered widespread GOP election fraud through what can be called an electronic fingerprint. He found that when you break down the primary results in to their component precincts, and then compare the percentage of each candidate and how much they gained per precinct, a pattern appeared:
__
The larger the district, the larger Mitt Romney’s percentage, in a smooth line.This is statistically improbable to occur even in one election. What he discovered is that this is not a one time fluke at all. Instead, he found the tell-tale signature of electronic manipulation…
As I said: I don’t have the knowledge to evaluate this data, and (as someone who still believes the 1988 election was an electronic trial run) I’m prone to believe the worst of the GOP under any circumstance. So I would genuinely appreciate being told, by people who know what they’re talking about, that this is just one of those anomalous patterns that statistical graphing will throw up.
Real or random, it’s not going to change my conviction that we don’t just need to win this election, we need to win by the widest margins possible.
Late Night Conspiracy Thread: Vote ‘Smoothing’Post + Comments (70)