• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Bark louder, little dog.

Thanks to your bullshit, we are now under siege.

When do we start airlifting the women and children out of Texas?

Fuck these fucking interesting times.

The truth is, these are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand.

Republicans don’t want a speaker to lead them; they want a hostage.

Some judge needs to shut this circus down soon.

In my day, never was longer.

Accused of treason; bitches about the ratings. I am in awe.

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

Since when do we limit our critiques to things we could do better ourselves?

No offense, but this thread hasn’t been about you for quite a while.

Putin must be throwing ketchup at the walls.

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires

My years-long effort to drive family and friends away has really paid off this year.

Whatever happens next week, the fight doesn’t end.

Roe isn’t about choice, it’s about freedom.

Good lord, these people are nuts.

I did not have this on my fuck 2022 bingo card.

Let’s not be the monsters we hate.

Historically it was a little unusual for the president to be an incoherent babbling moron.

An almost top 10,000 blog!

“Squeaker” McCarthy

I really should read my own blog.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!

Very Serious People

You are here: Home / Archives for Very Serious People

The Erasure Of Race

by Zandar|  February 22, 201510:36 am| 132 Comments

This post is in: Activist Judges!, Fables Of The Reconstruction, Post-racial America, Bring on the Brawndo!, Decline and Fall, I Reject Your Reality and Substitute My Own, Stuff About Black People Written By a Black Person, Very Serious People

FOX News contributor Juan Williams takes to the WSJ to write a paean to Justice Clarence Thomas entitled “America’s Most Influential Thinker on Race“.  It’s true in the same way Hurricane Katrina was America’s Most Influential Hurricane on Race.

Justice Thomas, who has been on the court nearly a quarter-century, remains a polarizing figure—loved by conservatives and loathed by liberals. But his “free”-thinking legal opinions are opening new roads for the American political debate on racial justice.

His opinions are rooted in the premise that the 14th Amendment—guaranteeing equal rights for all—cannot mean different things for different people. As he wrote in Fisher v. University of Texas (2013), he is opposed to “perpetual racial tinkering” by judges to fix racial imbalance and inequality at schools and the workplace. Yet he never contends racism has gone away. The fact that a 2001 article in Time magazine about him was headlined “Uncle Tom Justice” reminds us that racism stubbornly persists.

His only current rival in the race debate is President Obama. At moments of racial controversy the nation’s first black president has used his national pulpit to give voice to black fear that racial stereotyping led to tragedy. But that is as far as he is willing to go. His attorney general, Eric Holder , has gone further by calling Americans “cowards” when it comes to discussing race. And some critics have chastised him even for that.

Justice Thomas, meanwhile, is reshaping the law and government policy on race by virtue of the power of his opinions from the bench. Thurgood Marshall, the first African-American on the Supreme Court, stood up as a voice insisting on rights for black people. Justice Thomas, the second black man on the court, takes a different tack. He stands up for individual rights as a sure blanket of legal protection for everyone, including minorities.

Thomas has taken it upon himself to address racism by dismantling the civil rights era protections of the law over the last 50 years and saying “those were training wheels, you have to succeed on your own.”  This, he argues, will magically create the respect from white America necessary to rid the country of racism.

This only works of course if you believe that the direct victims of racism (which Thomas does absolutely recognize as still existing in America) are white people, and that the corrective actions of the Voting Rights Act and the Civil Rights Act and the Fair Housing Act other legislative fixes were the problem for the last two generations, and in no way part of the solution.

Thomas has many like-minded comrades on SCOTUS when it comes to this with the goal of putting America back to 1965, and that the Civil Rights era was a massive error, a huge mistake which has damaged America for decades.

Rather, Thomas’s solution is simple: the burden to rise above racism is placed upon minorities to simply be better and to succeed in spite of it, solely through personal responsibility. If racism exists (and Thomas again admits it does) then your duty as a black or Latino or Asian or other minority is to overcome it.  That’s all upon you to choose to do so.

If that sounds insane, and it sounds like “Hey, Thomas is absolving all of white America of racism even though he knows it exists in 2015” and “Why are minorities the bad guys here?” then you’re correct.  The free market will fix this.  It’s dangerous thinking, and yet the evidence is pretty solid that the Civil Rights era in America is ending, thanks in large part to Thomas.

The Erasure Of RacePost + Comments (132)

The Perfect Village Moment

by Zandar|  January 20, 201511:37 am| 128 Comments

This post is in: Our Failed Media Experiment, Somewhere a Village is Missing its Idiot, Very Serious People

With the State of the Union on tonight, Ron Fournier’s gotta Fournier on how to know if Obama is being a Very Serious Person or not during his speech, and it’s like discovering the Grand Unifying Theory of Villager.

Here’s but a taste:

The pronouns: Count how many times Obama uses the words “I,” “me,” and “my.” Compare that number to how often he says, “You,” “we,” “our.” If the first number is greater than the second, Obama has failed. He needs to remember the lesson of Mitt Romney’s 2012 campaign: Don’t dismiss the 47 percent of Americans who disagree with him.

The man is beyond self-parody.  He couldn’t have written more obtuse, pointless drivel if Charles Pierce’s cardboard standee of Ron Fournier was writing Ron Fournier’s columns.

The shellacking: It wouldn’t hurt to acknowledge the inconvenient truth that his leadership is the single biggest reason why Democrats lost the midterm elections in November. What lessons did he learn from the drubbing? How did those lesson shape his agenda? My colleague George Condon notes that every president of the past 100 years has been forced to address midterm defeats. Most have handled the situation with grace. Can Obama?

I mean look at this.  Every bit of condescending, pearl-clutching, eye-rolling iota of Fournier’s being is on display here, dismissing  the President’s speech some 12 hours before it’s even given.  It’s like looking at an ornithology field guide, and seeing a picture of a cardinal, and you put the book down and peer through your binoculars and immediately spot a perfect specimen of a cardinal, engaged in textbook cardinal behavior, doing all the cardinal-type things the field guide lists in order.

You will never find a better, more perfect example of Village Idiocy then this.  This is the ball between Buckner’s legs, it’s Mickelson’s Winged Foot shot into the trash can, the 2008 Detroit Lions’ loss number 16 in Green Bay in the 4th quarter.  This is as perfectly terrible as scolding Obama for something he hasn’t done yet, but will be blamed for anyway because of willful ignorance can get.

You have to salute the guy, it’s like bowling a perfect game by accident after spending the last six years bringing an incontinent rhino to take a soul-wrenching dump all over the lanes on league night and then setting everything on fire, and one glorious day the stampeding rhino manages to repeatedly slip on the flaming feces and keeps kicking the ball down the lane and manages to rack up 12 consecutive strikes. You know it’s mathematically possible, but you never expect to actually be in the presence of such an event.

Peak Fournier achieved.

 

The Perfect Village MomentPost + Comments (128)

Hell Of A Christmas News Dump, Fellas

by Zandar|  December 25, 20148:20 pm| 88 Comments

This post is in: War on Terror aka GSAVE®, Decline and Fall, Security Theatre, Serenity Now!, The Dirty F-ing Hippies Were Right, Very Serious People

Merry Christmas from the NSA.  It seems the Puzzle Palace has 12 years’ worth of presents to give to Americans.

The NSA, responding to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit from the American Civil Liberties Union, released a series of required quarterly and annual reportsto the President’s Intelligence Oversight Board that cover the period from the fourth quarter of 2001 to the second quarter of 2013.

The heavily-redacted reports include examples of data on Americans being e-mailed to unauthorized recipients, stored in unsecured computers and retained after it was supposed to be destroyed, according to the documents. They were posted on the NSA’s website at around 1:30 p.m. on Christmas Eve.

In a 2012 case, for example, an NSA analyst “searched her spouse’s personal telephone directory without his knowledge to obtain names and telephone numbers for targeting,” according to one report. The analyst “has been advised to cease her activities,” it said.

Other unauthorized cases were a matter of human error, not intentional misconduct.

Last year, an analyst “mistakenly requested” surveillance “of his own personal identifier instead of the selector associated with a foreign intelligence target,” according to another report.

In 2012, an analyst conducted surveillance “on a U.S. organization in a raw traffic database without formal authorization because the analyst incorrectly believed that he was authorized to query due to a potential threat,” according to the fourth-quarter report from 2012. The surveillance yielded nothing.

Two thoughts:  One, as I’ve said numerous times, it’s entirely possible to hold the position that both the NSA needs massive reform to prevent civil liberties abuses, and that Edward Snowden went about exposing these abuses in a way that damaged national security.  The ACLU on the other hand requested this information through FOIA, and got it.  No espionage or skulduggery was required, and the information clearly shows the NSA isn’t following its own procedures.  This was the right way to get evidence of these massive abuses and does so in a manner that’s both responsible and powerful.

And that brings me to Thought Two: please remember that Senate Republicans, including Rand Paul, killed legislation that would have increased oversight and civil liberties protections involving the NSA just last month, so the opportunity to do something about this was killed by the GOP.  They’re not interested in reforming the NSA, they’re interested in allowing these abuses to continue, and the next Congress will do precisely nothing to rein this garbage in.

It’s pretty rancid for a Christmas Day news dump, but there you have it.

Hell Of A Christmas News Dump, FellasPost + Comments (88)

Glibertarian Uber Alles

by Zandar|  December 15, 20142:26 pm| 275 Comments

This post is in: Glibertarianism, Show Us on the Doll Where the Invisible Hand Touched You, Very Serious People

Ride share service/tech darling/social media punching bag Uber got into trouble again during the early stages of the Sydney hostage crisis by jacking up fares to 4x base rate, and Matt Yglesias reminds us that this is a feature of Uber, not a bug and wants to know what the big deal is.

Uber’s stubborn refusal to conform in this regard is, in a way, admirable since it gives us all something to talk and think about. Can they make it work?

One possible solution would be to copy the major consumer-facing industries that do impose variable pricing — hotels and airlines. The way these companies generally manage to get away with it is through a massive lack of transparency. You can’t look up “the price” of a United flight from Newark to Chicago, and then see whether the price at any particular time reflects a surge multiple of the base or not. You need to go online, try to book a flight, and then just see what they want to charge. Hotels operate the same way.

In both cases, the actual price-determining formulae are much more complicated than Uber’s surge multiples. Consumers don’t exactly love these industries, but by making it unclear when prices have spiked, airlines manage to get away without storms of social media outrage over spiking prices.

Many retailers accomplish something similar by making the “official” price ridiculously high, and then offering various discounts. At JC Penny, the question is whether your shirt will be 25 percent off or just 15 percent off, a non-transparent framing of surge pricing that people seem to like better.

So really, Uber’s problem is that their just too transparent in their desire to charge whatever the market will allow. Hell, Yggy loves this idea so much he wants to see it elsewhere.

Popular hatred of demand-responsive pricing is in many ways a huge challenge for transportation policy. That’s because most wonky analysts think the government should be acting more like Uber, while most people seem to want the government to force Uber to stop acting like Uber.

Rather than under-pricing street parking and leading to constant shortages and fights,cities should be charging market rates for scarce space. This would both make it easier to find parking, and generate a big new stream of revenue that could be used to boost incomes (through lower sales taxes) or increase public service levels. Similarly, traffic jams could be made a thing of the past through congestion pricing on roads. Here, again, demand-responsive pricing would not only help address a specific problem, but unleash a gusher of useful revenue.

These are good ideas and well-known in the policy community, but they’re rarely implemented. That’s presumably for the same reason it’s hard, but not necessarily expensive, to get a table at a popular restaurant on the weekend — politicians fear the public backlash.

Alas, if only we consumers were all smart enough to see how awesome Uber’s model is, and how the relentless pursuit of profit is in fact awesome for everybody here on planet Earth Fereginar.   Look, the only thing people seem to hate more than Uber is government acting like Uber, and deservedly so. Once government becomes surge pricing and rent seeking all day all of the time, it’s no longer government, it’s tragicomic bureaucracy.  The backlash might even be justified when people figure out that having to fork over “congestion pricing” or take the long way home is just another regressive scheme to stick it to those damn poors.

Besides, if Uber’s the best model, won’t the markets decide?  Man, this is silly glibertarian nonsense, even for Team Vox.  Hell, let’s have surge pricing on everything: water, pork chop sandwiches, thinkpieces, everything.

It’ll be great cause it’s transparent, wheeeeeeeee!

 

Glibertarian Uber AllesPost + Comments (275)

Even The “Liberal” New Republic

by Zandar|  December 4, 20145:28 pm| 138 Comments

This post is in: Even the "Liberal" New Republic, Somewhere a Village is Missing its Idiot, Very Serious People

Seems Chris Hughes broke his toy to the point where Frank Foer is out as editor at The New Republic and everyone else is jumping ship in protest.  People are resigning by Twitter.  It’s freaking AWESOME.

Jon Chait is pissed.

I expect the circumstances surrounding TNR’s transformation will be framed as a matter of modernity versus tradition. There is certainly an element of this. At the magazine’s 100th anniversary gala two weeks ago, where Hughes, Foer, Wieseltier, and Hughes’s new CEO, Guy Vidra, all spoke, the speeches took a sharply, awkwardly divergent tone. Foer and Weiseltier gave soaring paeans to the magazine’s immense role in shaping American liberal thought. Hughes and Vidra used words like brand and boasted about page views, giving no sense of appreciation at all for the magazine’s place in American life. In a comic moment, Vidra mispronounced Foer’s name. I happened to run into Wieseltier a few days after the gala, and when he asked me what I thought, I told him he and Foer won the debate.

But the conflict between Hughes and most of the staff of The New Republic is not about technology. Foer and the staff, with the exception of Wieseltier, are comfortable with modernity. They are joyous bloggers, and willingly submitted to the introduction of cringe-worthy Upworthy headlines to their stories and other compromises one must make with commercial needs.

The problem, rather, is that Hughes and Vidra are afflicted with the belief that they can copy the formula that transformed the Huffington Post and BuzzFeed into economic successes, which is probably wrong, and that this formula can be applied to The New Republic, which is certainly wrong.

Several weeks ago, Vidra communicated the new vision to the staff in what I am told was an uncomfortable stream of business clichés ungrounded in any apparent strategy other than saying things like “let’s break shit” and “we’re a tech company now.” His memo to the staff predictably uses terms like “straddle generation” and “brand.” It promises to make TNR “a vertically integrated digital media company,” possibly unaware that “vertically integrated” is an actual business concept, not a term for a media company that integrates verticals.

Hughes and Vidra have provided no reason at all for anybody to believe they have a plausible plan to modernize The New Republic. If they did, Frank Foer would still be editor. My only hope now is that one day this vital American institution can be rebuilt.

Me?  The number of damns I give about TNR as a going concern at this point equals approximately the number of black voices writing for the magazine, which is to say zero, but YMMV.  The thing survived two world wars, the Great Depression, Watergate, the fall of the Soviet Union, 9/11, New Coke, and 74,927 episodes of Law and Order, but couldn’t handle one Silicon Valley douchebag with a giant checkbook in possession of all the common sense of a chunk of asphalt.  I guess it’s a little sad to see something like that implode but….

Naah.

Also, anybody else notice that Techbros Turning Journalism Outlets Into Huge Piles Of Shit(tm) seems to be a recurring theme of 2014?  There’s an awful lot of that going around.

Even The “Liberal” New RepublicPost + Comments (138)

Gitmo The Hell Out

by Zandar|  December 2, 20148:56 am| 64 Comments

This post is in: Fables Of The Reconstruction, Military, War on Terror aka GSAVE®, Democratic Cowardice, Very Serious People

Hey look, Congress stabbed Obama in the back on closing Gitmo again.  Quelle surprise!

President Obama’s 5-year-old campaign to close the federal prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, suffered a major setback as lawmakers finalizing the annual defense policy bill rejected steps toward shuttering the facility.

Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., chairman of the Armed Services Committee, told reporters on Monday that the final bill omits a provision giving the president the authority to transfer terror suspects to the United States if Congress signs off on a comprehensive plan to close the prison.

Levin had pushed for the authority and hailed it in May as creating “a path to close Guantanamo.” With lawmakers rushing to complete the defense bill in this month’s lame-duck session, Levin said proponents were unable to prevail.

“Our language … (on Guantanamo) … will not be in,” Levin said.

The House and Senate are expected to vote and overwhelmingly approve the sweeping policy bill in the coming days, sending it to Obama.

Here “overwhelmingly” means “more than a two-thirds veto-proof margin”, which of course requires a significant number of congressional Democrats to screw Obama over on closing Gitmo and not just the GOP.  So after this becomes law, and it will, even if Gitmo does close, the President can’t do anything with the detainees who are there as far as moving them to the US.  They’d have to be housed in another foreign facility.

So no, Gitmo is not going to close, and every time President Obama tries to do something about it, Congress throws a veto-proof bill on his desk saying “The hell you ever will.”

If anybody has a viable plan as to how President Obama can actually close Gitmo in this environment, where Congress keeps moving the goalposts and we keep re-electing 95% of the Congress I’m all ears.

Gitmo The Hell OutPost + Comments (64)

It’s Like LinkedIn, Only For Supervillains

by Zandar|  November 17, 201411:48 am| 29 Comments

This post is in: IOKIYAR, Ever Get The Feeling You've Been Cheated?, Very Serious People

Republicans leveraging technology, yo.

Republicans and outside groups used anonymous Twitter accounts to share internal polling data ahead of the midterm elections, CNN has learned, a practice that raises questions about whether they violated campaign finance laws that prohibit coordination.

The Twitter accounts were hidden in plain sight. The profiles were publicly available but meaningless without knowledge of how to find them and decode the information, according to a source with knowledge of the activities.

The practice is the latest effort in the quest by political operatives to exploit the murky world of campaign finance laws at a time when limits on spending in politics are eroding and regulators are being defanged.

The law says that outside groups, such as super PACs and non-profits, can spend freely on political causes as long as they don’t coordinate their plans with campaigns. Sharing costly internal polls in private, for instance, could signal to the campaign committees where to focus precious time and resources.

That seems fair and on the level, especially because IOKIYAR.

I really am disappointed that Democrats aren’t the ones doing this, because then we’d have the Tea Party screeching for 501(c) reform and to pass the DISCLOSE Act.

Or, they’d just impeach Twitter or something.

It’s Like LinkedIn, Only For SupervillainsPost + Comments (29)

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 3
  • Go to page 4
  • Go to page 5
  • Go to page 6
  • Go to page 7
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 10
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

2023 Pet Calendars

Pet Calendar Preview: A
Pet Calendar Preview: B

*Calendars can not be ordered until Cafe Press gets their calendar paper in.

Recent Comments

  • Miss Bianca on It’s 2023, not 2020 (Feb 7, 2023 @ 12:57pm)
  • Sister Machine Gun of Quiet Harmony on It’s 2023, not 2020 (Feb 7, 2023 @ 12:56pm)
  • schrodingers_cat on Tuesday Morning Open Thread: State of the Union Prep (Feb 7, 2023 @ 12:55pm)
  • Barbara on It’s 2023, not 2020 (Feb 7, 2023 @ 12:55pm)
  • Barbara on It’s 2023, not 2020 (Feb 7, 2023 @ 12:55pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Favorite Dogs & Cats
Classified Documents: A Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Front-pager Twitter

John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
ActualCitizensUnited

Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice   

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc