I thought it would be deficit scare-mongering, but it’s actually teh bipartisanship. Gergen (via Digby):
In my judgment it’s a tragedy for the country to have a bill this important, a historic piece of legislation, pass with only one party voting for it.
Broder tomorrow (no link from me):
But even those Republicans who were initially inclined to do that — and there were at least a handful of them — were turned away by the White House and the Senate Democratic leaders, who never lifted their sights much beyond the Democratic ranks.
[…]It would help a lot if he reached out personally to those few Republicans who might still want to improve the bill rather than sink it. And it would help even more if he shamed the Democrats into rescinding some of the crasser bargains they made to buy votes along the way.
The country would welcome even a few signs that this legislation has bipartisan support.
It makes sense when you think about it: deficit scare-mongering requires a little bit of number crunching or at least a few google searches.
But you can whine about bipartianship and all the Republicans that would have supported the bill if only Obama had sweet-talked them without even mentioning the name of a single Republican Senator. It’s just easier.
