“He (still) hates America’s great military traditions!” Tweaking the beast, in the pages of the Washington Post:
…The service academies — the U.S. Military Academy for the Army (West Point), the U.S. Naval Academy, the U.S. Air Force Academy and the U.S. Coast Guard Academy — promise to educate and mold future officers charged with leading the enlisted members of the military.
But they are not the hallowed arbiters of quality promised by their myths. Their traditions mask bloated government money-sucks that consistently underperform. They are centers of nepotism that turn below-average students into average officers. They are indulgences that taxpayers, who fund them, can no longer afford. They’ve outlived their use, and it’s time to shut them down.
The most compelling and obvious argument is the financial one. It officially costs about $205,000 to produce a West Point graduate, although a 2003 Government Accountability Office study put the price tag at more than $300,000; officers at the Air Force and Naval academies are minted for $322,000 and $275,000, respectively. According to at least one measurement, that’s about four times as much as it costs to produce an officer through the Reserve Officers’ Training Corps, which trains officers-to-be while they attend civilian colleges…
Anecdotes are not data, but in my experience, committed Libertarians have been the biggest service-academy cheerleaders — knowing how to “work the system” to ensure that your kid can become “recognized for life as a member of the elite” is a valuable bragging point.
I’m willing to accept that America needs to pay for a permanent officer corp, but it does seem like ROTC is both a cheaper and a more democratic method. Your thoughts?