Barrett spurns Supreme Court bias claims after string of Trump shadow docket wins
“I want people to understand, agree or disagree with the decisions that the court reaches, that we are engaged in a legal enterprise."
@courthousenews.bsky.social
www.courthousenews.com/barrett-spur…— Kelsey Reichmann (@kelseyreichmann.bsky.social) September 25, 2025 at 5:54 PM
===
Thomas also gave public remarks on Thursday, suggesting that the precedent purge isn’t ending anytime soon www.courthousenews.com/thomas-signa…
— Kelsey Reichmann (@kelseyreichmann.bsky.social) September 25, 2025 at 10:05 PM
Josh Marshall has some proposals:
For 26 but especially 2028 it's time for Democrats to make clear that the current Supreme Court will have to be reformed (expanded in number, reformed in structure) to allow popular govt to continue in the United States. Not so much a litmus test as precondition for any other promise to be credible.
— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm.bsky.social) September 27, 2025 at 11:38 AM
2/ My own preference is for the number of Justices to be expanded by at least six for terms of ten years (re-appointable) and the Court restructured to operate more like one of the federal appellate circuits. But that’s just one idea, not necessarily the best. This can all be done by simple…
3/ majority votes. There remains a lot of resistance to these necessary reforms. But the last eight months have helpfully clarified the extreme corruption of the current court. No new legislation can have real impact as long as the Court willfully misinterprets the plain meaning of statutes or …
4/ makes de facto rulings without opinions that provide explanation or precedent. The responsibility for this dangerous set of circumstances rests entirely with the corruption of the current members.
5/ It’s a very secondary matter. But this is also something all law professors and people in legal academia generally need to reckon with. Over the last three or four years there’s been a growing number of law profs who’ve been forced to reckon with the current majority’s extreme corruption …
6/ and realize, admit that reform is necessary. But quite a few still persist making excuses for the current corruption as though it were a matter of differing judicial philosophies etc. In a way it’s professional self-preservation because if the work of the legal judicial/academic system isn’t …
7/ an intellectual pursuit, a matter of scholarship and thought but rather a system of mystification and pure power than what are you doing exactly? Then it’s just PR work for people who got great grades as undergrads and nailed the LSATs. I’m not saying that’s the entirety of it.
8/ But that’s the reality for those who haven’t been able to reckon with the Court’s corruption.
Another ‘engaged in a legal enterprise’ proponent heard from:
Justice Anthony Kennedy tells @npr.org's @ninatotenberg.bsky.social "very worried" about our country, and that "Democracy is not guaranteed to survive."
Kennedy wrote Citizens United and was the fifth vote in the rest of the Roberts Court's anti-democratic decisions.
www.npr.org/2025/09/27/n…— Mike Sacks (@mikesacks.bsky.social) September 27, 2025 at 7:34 PM
Sunday Morning Open Thread: How Do We Reform the Supreme Court?Post + Comments (214)



