• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Fuck these fucking interesting times.

“Can i answer the question? No you can not!”

Nothing worth doing is easy.

Republicans are radicals, not conservatives.

Republicans don’t want a speaker to lead them; they want a hostage.

Joe Lieberman disappointingly reemerged to remind us that he’s still alive.

Don’t expect peaches from an apple tree.

It’s time for the GOP to dust off that post-2012 autopsy, completely ignore it, and light the party on fire again.

Damn right I heard that as a threat.

You come for women, you’re gonna get your ass kicked.

The poor and middle-class pay taxes, the rich pay accountants, the wealthy pay politicians.

Let’s not be the monsters we hate.

A snarling mass of vitriolic jackals

The most dangerous place for a black man in America is in a white man’s imagination.

Fani Willis claps back at Trump chihuahua, Jim Jordan.

“In the future, this lab will be a museum. don’t touch it.”

Incompetence, fear, or corruption? why not all three?

A consequence of cucumbers

Following reporting rules is only for the little people, apparently.

DeSantis transforms Florida into 1930s Germany with gators and theme parks.

Speaking of republicans, is there a way for a political party to declare intellectual bankruptcy?

They love authoritarianism, but only when they get to be the authoritarians.

Do not shrug your shoulders and accept the normalization of untruths.

Sitting here in limbo waiting for the dice to roll

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable VA House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Archives for Science & Technology / Tech News and Issues

Tech News and Issues

Tuesday Evening Open Thread: Checking In On Twitter’s ‘God Emperor’

by Anne Laurie|  June 20, 20238:06 pm| 67 Comments

This post is in: C.R.E.A.M., Open Threads, Tech News and Issues, Assholes, Schadenfreude

“The Twitter buyout may be one of the worst acquisitions in the history of Wall Street, with something like $37 billion in value flushed pretty much as soon as the deal closed.”

— Via @WilliamCohan https://t.co/DkZkvM8dE7

— Bill Grueskin (@BGrueskin) June 19, 2023

Since Puck is distinctly a niche publication, thought I’d share this piece from ‘former restructuring and bankruptcy advisor at Lazard’ William Cohan, “Will Elon Lose Control of Twitter?”.

(Bad news first, probably not, assuming he still wants to keep it… )

Oh dear, what is going on these days with Elon Musk at Twitter? Let’s see: Twitter is being kicked out of its office in Boulder because—wait for it—Elon decided to stop paying the rent. He’s stopped paying the bills for Twitter’s use of Google Cloud and, according to my partner Eriq Gardner, for JAMS, the arbitration administrator that is adjudicating many of Musk’s legal disputes with his ex-employees. He’s also facing a lawsuit from the Wall Street P.R. firm, Joele Frank, which claims it’s owed more than $830,000 in fees for advice it provided during Musk’s campaign to buy Twitter last year.

As a former restructuring and bankruptcy advisor at Lazard, I can recognize the signs of a company in distress. After all, it’s a pretty obvious tell that there’s financial trouble brewing when a company stops paying its bills as they become due. That’s a recipe for financial disaster, or bankruptcy, or both. Last time I checked, if a company has more than 12 creditors—as Twitter does—then any three of them can join together to put a company into an involuntary bankruptcy proceeding. And Elon is in danger here. At some point, the creditors he is mindlessly stiffing on a regular basis are going to get sufficiently pissed to throw Twitter into bankruptcy.

But I don’t get it, dude. Elon is the world’s richest man, with a net worth of some $233 billion, according to Bloomberg, up an astounding $100 billion so far in 2023. Why is he not paying the people he owes money to? Why is he risking an involuntary bankruptcy filing? And then, of course, there is the upcoming interest payment of around $300 million due to the group of seven or so banks that still hold Twitter’s $13 billion of debt used to pay a portion of the $44 billion Twitter purchase price. I know Elon made the interest payments owed in January and in May. But will he make the next one, due in September? I suppose not paying those (metaphorical) nickels and dimes is one thing. But if he doesn’t pay the banks the $300 million he owes them in September, he will be asking for trouble in the form of a financial restructuring, or worse, a bankruptcy filing…

show full post on front page

What’s as clear today as it was on October 27, when the $44 billion changed hands and Elon took control of Twitter, is that the $31 billion of equity that Elon ($24 billion) and his friends ($7 billion) put into the leveraged buyout of Twitter is gone. It’s a zero. In fact, the Twitter buyout may be one of the very worst acquisitions in the history of Wall Street, with something like $37 billion in value flushed—the $31 billion of equity and about half of the value of the $13 billion of debt, or another $6 billion—pretty much as soon as the deal closed.

Unfortunately for Elon, and his fellow equity holders and the banks still holding on to the $13 billion of debt (which should have been syndicated long ago), he has done nothing in the eight months since he’s owned Twitter to create value for his partners; in fact, just the opposite. He’s destroyed value for the equity and made it virtually impossible for the big Wall Street banks that still own the $13 billion of senior debt to sell it to other investors, unless they are willing to take a huge writedown—on the order of 50 percent—to move the debt off their balance sheets. At some point, the Federal Reserve, the banks’ prudential regulator, is going to force them to sell the debt, perfect their losses, or to take a serious impairment charge against the debt and perfect that loss…

So what is Elon’s game here? Perhaps, as I have written before, he is essentially cosplaying as a bankrupt entity—by not paying his bills as they become due—so that he can scare the big Wall Street banks that own Twitter’s $13 billion of debt to sell it to him at a steep discount, perhaps at a price even lower than the 50 cents on the dollar it would probably trade for now, if marketed to investors. Not that Elon necessarily wants to buy the debt, even at a big discount. But this may be the path of least resistance if he wants to prevent the company from falling into the hands of the voracious distressed debt community on Wall Street who are in the “loan-to-own” business.

Once that bank debt starts to trade, the Twitter fireworks will really begin. If Elon buys the debt, then he can keep control of Twitter for whatever perverse reasons he has for still wanting to own this pig. If the debt gets bought by the likes of DoubleLine Capital, or Apollo, or Oaktree Capital, then all bets are off for Elon and he will lose control of Twitter.

Tuesday Evening Open Thread: Checking In On Twitter’s ‘God Emperor’Post + Comments (67)

“I’m a Brown Person. Do You think People on Substack Should Say I Should Get Kicked Out of the Country?”

by John Cole|  April 15, 202311:32 am| 139 Comments

This post is in: Post Racial America, Tech News and Issues

This is the most damning interview I have seen to date with a glibertarian techbro, and it is shocking:

This week, @decoderpod host @reckless asked Substack CEO Chris Best the tough questions about whether racist speech should be allowed in their new consumer product, Substack Notes. pic.twitter.com/sErJUPoL9s

— The Verge (@verge) April 13, 2023

Mike Masnick at TechDirt breaks it down:

I get it. I totally get it. Every tech dude comes along and has this thought: “hey, we’ll be the free speech social media site. We won’t do any moderation beyond what’s required.” Even Twitter initially thought this. But then everyone discovers reality. Some discover it faster than others, but everyone discovers it. First, you realize that there’s spam. Or illegal content such as child sexual abuse material. And if that doesn’t do it for you, the copyright police will.

But, then you realize that beyond spam and content that breaks the rules, you end up with malicious users who cause trouble. And trouble drives away users, advertisers, or both. And if you don’t deal with the malicious users, the malicious users define you. It’s the “oh shit, this is a Nazi bar now” problem.

And, look, sure, in the US, you can run the Nazi bar, thanks to the 1st Amendment. But running a Nazi bar is not winning any free speech awards. It’s not standing up for free speech. It’s building your own brand as the Nazi bar and abdicating your own free speech rights of association to kick Nazis out of your private property, and to craft a different kind of community. Let the Nazis build their own bar, or everyone will just assume you’re a Nazi too.

It was understandable a decade ago, before the idea of “trust & safety” was a thing, that not everyone would understand all this. But it is unacceptable for the CEO of a social media site today to not realize this.

Enter Substack CEO Chris Best.

***

And your reputation when you refuse to moderate is not “the grand enabler of free speech.” Because it’s the internet itself that is the grand enabler of free speech. When you’re a private centralized company and you don’t deal with hateful content on your site, you’re the Nazi bar.

Most companies that want to get large enough recognize that playing to the grifters and the nonsense peddlers works for a limited amount of time, before you get the Nazi bar reputation, and your growth is limited. And, in the US, you’re legally allowed to become the Nazi bar, but you should at least embrace that, and not pretend you have some grand principled strategy.

This is what Nilay was getting at. When you’re not the government, you can set whatever rules you want, and the rules you set are the rules that will define what you are as a service. Chris Best wants to pretend that Substack isn’t the Nazi bar, while he’s eagerly making it clear that it is.

It’s stupidly short-sighted, and no, it won’t support free speech. Because people who don’t want to hang out at the Nazi bar will just go elsewhere.

Personally, I would add that in addition to calling it the Nazi Bar, we should call it what it is- a safe space for hate speech.

“I’m a Brown Person. Do You think People on Substack Should Say I Should Get Kicked Out of the Country?”Post + Comments (139)

OpenAI’s Latest Image Generator is Pretty Damn Impressive

by Major Major Major Major|  April 27, 20223:28 pm| 70 Comments

This post is in: Open Threads, Science & Technology, Tech News and Issues

I wrote about text-to-image AIs here last summer. Well, the latest bleeding-edge model is out; it is way more interesting, so I thought I’d drop an update.

It’s called DALL-E 2, and it’s made by OpenAI, which also produces the GPT text generation AIs I’ve written about. They’ve given early access to a bunch of people who have been posting the results on Twitter. It’s not super surprising that the shared images are impressive; AI enthusiasts aren’t going to be sharing the failures, which I assume are frequent. Still–the successes are very, very successful.

Here’s one, and then we can move below the fold so the blog doesn’t drown in tweets.

As we lead up to #MicrosoftBuild, I’m getting excited with “30 days of DALL-E 2”! Send me your (respectful) prompts, and every day from April 24-May 24, I’ll post an AI-generated #dalle2 image. #30DaysOfDalle2

“Oil painting of a sad girl looking out the window of a school bus” pic.twitter.com/NApsb1kOmi

— Jennifer Marsman (@jennifermarsman) April 22, 2022

show full post on front page

Made from the prompt “Pre-modern Japanese scroll about Bitcoin” #dalle2 #dalle pic.twitter.com/CLUgv27aX2

— Dalle2 Pics (@Dalle2Pics) April 22, 2022

And here’s a whole thread of variations on ‘a lion holding a globe’:

pic.twitter.com/PyI2ne5zoe

— Ryan Petersen (@typesfast) April 27, 2022

Here’s a lay-technical description of how it works that is better than anything I could write.

As with all generative AIs, this raises lots of concerns. For example, generative AIs are biased by their training set. If most of the images of lawyers you feed it are older white men, it will mostly generate images of older white men when you ask it for lawyers; conversely, flight attendants seem to all be smiling Asian women. (As the linked article notes, OpenAI does write about this, which is more than you can say for a lot of AI creators.) Then there’s the question of intellectual property. We’ve made a chunk of math that indiscriminately remixes copyrighted content; what would the lawyers (white men or otherwise) say? Finally, these things are inevitably resource-intensive, so there are the usual questions of cost/scaling/energy when we think about widespread adoption. (Hey, at least it’s a better use of resources than bitcoin!)

I don’t have access to this AI yet, so I don’t feel like speculating too much on its role in society, but it seems like it would work great as a jumping-off point for visual artists toying with a new idea, or non-artists/hobbyists looking to bootstrap a project. It’s likely better for this than the text generators are. GPT-3 can come up with some pretty neat turns of phrase–“it was the kind of place where you could fall in love, or die, or maybe even do both at the same time”–but it also spits out a lot of blah, and is often nonsensical in a way that works better for images.

As always, I do not have a strong conclusion. Open thread!

OpenAI’s Latest Image Generator is Pretty Damn ImpressivePost + Comments (70)

Late Night Open Thread: Tweeters Review Twitter Buy (Proposal)

by Anne Laurie|  April 26, 20221:24 am| 75 Comments

This post is in: C.R.E.A.M., Tech News and Issues, Assholes, social media

musk’s “i will fix twitter” has big “kyiv in three days” energy

— Seva (@SevaUT) April 15, 2022

Translation: if his worst critics leave, Twitter will be as worthless as Gab, Gettr (lol) and Truth Social. He needs y'all to stay on here so his "free speech" people can harass you for fun. Because dude does not ALWAYS believe in free speech… https://t.co/k21qu1QXwT https://t.co/Z2UNJs8LU6

— Joy-Ann (Pro-Democracy) Reid ?? (@JoyAnnReid) April 25, 2022

As the business media have been careful to point out, any deal of this size takes six months or more to finalize. And, the unspoken subtext runs, many highly publicized megadeals never come to fruition, especially when the bid is led by a guy renowned for ideas about child-sized rescue submarines and brain implants. So it’s a little early yet to panic, not that logic ever stopped Twitter users…

show full post on front page

Who can we get to explain that Musk doesn't want Twitter for any logical reason and just wants to wat- https://t.co/3WFuw1kOFF

— zeddy (@Zeddary) April 25, 2022


(Reference: Some men just want to watch the world burn)

What will change is that in the one or two cases a year that make news that Musk reads (Trump, Babylon Bee) he’ll personally intervene. The rest of the moderation decisions will be made as before.

— Noah Snyder (@NoahJSnyder) April 25, 2022

Whereas up until now you were doing this for a slightly less weird rich guy. https://t.co/82Uq9YDmWM

— The Substack of Boba Fett (@agraybee) April 25, 2022

there’s not exactly a surplus of talented software engineers right now and if you’re winnowing the field to “talented software engineers who are willing to enable alex jones” you’ve got a real who-does-the-work challenge

— kilgore trout, death to putiner (@KT_So_It_Goes) April 25, 2022

This is why no blue check is going anywhere. This place is a combination of Linkedin, Facebook, Instagram and OnlyFans.

— The Substack of Boba Fett (@agraybee) April 25, 2022

i mean it cannot get any clearer that the people seeking to destabilize society are perfectly happy to do so under their real names and in fact benefit from doing so

— Seva (@SevaUT) April 25, 2022

i mean, sure, if what you want out of twitter is a bunch of elon musk fanboi crypto degenerates, great, that's what he wants, too, but that's not the majority of people *on twitter*, nor is it what people come here for.

— GOLIKEHELLMACHINE (@golikehellmachi) April 25, 2022

on the other hand, we may not have to worry about leaving if twitter leaves us https://t.co/dua0SY57qe

— GOLIKEHELLMACHINE (@golikehellmachi) April 25, 2022

OLD: Applauding magnates for using their unfathomable wealth to improve material conditions for millions of people.

NEW: Applauding magnates for using their unfathomable wealth to persecute ordinary people who anger them.

— Fred of Fred Hall (@LesserFrederick) April 25, 2022

Late Night Open Thread: Tweeters Review Twitter Buy (Proposal)Post + Comments (75)

C.R.E.A.M. Open Thread: Hail to the Chief (Sh*tposter)

by Anne Laurie|  April 17, 20228:23 pm| 91 Comments

This post is in: C.R.E.A.M., Open Threads, Tech News and Issues, Assholes

Twitter adopted a 'poison pill' – a limited-duration shareholder rights plan – to protect itself from billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk's $43 billion cash takeover offer https://t.co/l2YPMRcdZZ $TWTR pic.twitter.com/aAsq52dKQd

— Reuters (@Reuters) April 16, 2022

A November 2021 post from Roy Edroso, professional Cassandra, is being recirculated around Twitter — “Operation Overlord: Why Elon Musk will run for President”:

Predictions are a mug’s game, as we all know, but I’ll lay one down right now: I think there will be a serious push over the next twelve years (assuming the nation lasts that long) to nominate Elon Musk as a Republican candidate for President of the United States. Since he’s not a native-born American this would require amendment of Article II of the Constitution, so I expect that to happen as well.

You may wonder why the Republicans would bother to elevate someone whose nomination would require all that extra groundwork. First of all, amending the Constitution would not be that big a deal; it’s not as if they respect the thing any more than they do the other instruments of government they’re always fucking with, and they might even enjoy the perverse challenge to put their shit-stains on the old parchment just as a flex; they might make “Let’s Go Brandon” the National Anthem while they’re at it.

My contention is that, from what we know about Republicans, policy no longer has anything to do with their decisions, and they mainly want be represented by someone who fits their idea of American greatness — which, as we see from their current avatar Trump, means their champion must be vicious and boorish and, above all, project a winning air. In my view Musk laps the field…

show full post on front page

Musk acts as if the rules don’t apply to him — and he’s right. He was born into huge wealth and his feet have never touched the ground. Thus he goes through life in a way that would be called “blundering,” were it not for the fact that his extreme wealth — far beyond what Trump even pretends to have — insulates him from any possible consequences…

And thanks to his connection with futuristic-libertarian enterprises such as Space X and Tesla, Musk appeals not only to the current Republican base of brute-worshippers, but also to a burgeoning Republican constituency of crypto and NFT dorks. The “weird nerd” defenses of Musk that pop up on the internet whenever their hero is denigrated are at least as voluminous and ludicrously impassioned as that of any pop star “hive.” These are the kind of guys who, when they see a story about a human getting hurt or killed by a self-driving car, side with the car.

And, I believe, these dorks represent a growing cult of young men who have been rattling around incel-pickup artist territory awhile, but have matured — not enough to start making rational, adult decisions, perhaps, but enough to turn away from these childish forms of anti-social behavior toward other, more adult-seeming forms of anti-social behavior that make them feel less pathetic.

And who is better equipped to represent them than the guy who comes at dorkdom from the totally opposite direction — one who is incompetent to observe society’s rules, not because he was bullied in school or fucked up by feckless parents, but because he has never had to bother. He is as dysfunctional as they are, but rich and famous. No wonder they worship him…

pic.twitter.com/Nz6kTUf0IM

— Jort-Michel Connard ?? (@torriangray) April 15, 2022

Proposed 28th Amendment pic.twitter.com/zFRPWdqEfb

— USankMyBattleshipHat (@Popehat) April 16, 2022

/3 And I picked 35 years for parity — any person would have to be a citizen for 35 years to be eligible.

As for concerns that we might foolishly elect some horrific anti-American tyrant who hates our values and kowtows to some foreign potentate . . . . well.

— USankMyBattleshipHat (@Popehat) April 16, 2022

I dunno, have you seen the replies to his tweets

— Snopp Doog (@chrispossible) April 16, 2022

C.R.E.A.M. Open Thread: Hail to the Chief (Sh*tposter)Post + Comments (91)

Saturday Morning Open Thread: Spring Holidays

by Anne Laurie|  April 16, 20228:32 am| 120 Comments

This post is in: Biden Administration in Action, Open Threads, Proud to Be A Democrat, Tech News and Issues

“The first lady, who is a teacher, is calling it the “Egg-ucation Roll” and is turning the South Lawn into a school community with a variety of educational stations.” https://t.co/KCuzcJ0fDM

— darlene superville (@dsupervilleap) April 15, 2022

Yes, it’s Politico, but the article is still positive:

NEW — The complexities of being Doug Emhoff.

I wrote about the burdens, and joys, of being America’s Jewish Dad. And why, even with that lofty title, the matzah he made tasted like wet cardboard thrown into a toaster oven.https://t.co/clYdp1VG8L

— Sam Stein (@samstein) April 15, 2022


Answer, per every Jewish respondent: Plain matzah always tastes like wet cardboard thrown into a toaster oven!

show full post on front page

Beloved local holiday:

Runners 'pumped' as Boston Marathon returns to April https://t.co/Ys9sTeo4o1 pic.twitter.com/E2JPPYoPx3

— Reuters (@Reuters) April 16, 2022

I ran this quip past the Spousal Unit, technical writer (aka, Speaker to Programmers) and he laughed really hard…

every software engineer's dream is to get rich, buy that goat farm in the country, and then retire to the server room in the basement of the goat farm so they can actually finally write code

— Daniel Feldman.yaml (@d_feldman) April 12, 2022

Argh pen tester was right there and I missed it

— Daniel Feldman.yaml (@d_feldman) April 12, 2022

Scrum master

Pen(etration) testing

Saturday Morning Open Thread: Spring HolidaysPost + Comments (120)

Late Night Open Thread: Musk Buys Into Twitter

by Anne Laurie|  April 5, 20223:19 am| 16 Comments

This post is in: C.R.E.A.M., Open Threads, Tech News and Issues, Assholes

and we kick it off, of course, with mainstream outlets parroting the claim that Musk's concern here is "free speech," and not, say, his well-documented interest in crushing people who point out his products are half-baked and his companies' labor practices are abysmal pic.twitter.com/PLJm17iJTz

— Karl Bode (@KarlBode) April 4, 2022

Musk gets himself crosswise the SEC just tweeting, never mind attempting to influence the whole platform, but when you’ve got that much money I guess you have to keep shoveling it out of the yacht just to stay afloat. As a publicity stunt — EM’s main business form, AFAICT — it’s already accomplished its presumed goal, making The Richest Man both richer and more notorious in a single day. Per Reuters Opinion:

Unlike Twitter (TWTR.N), Edgar isn’t a household name. But occasionally the latter – the Securities and Exchange Commission’s public filing database – can be a more powerful platform. Tesla (TSLA.O) boss Elon Musk disclosed in a filing on Monday that he has acquired a 9.2% stake in Twitter (TWTR.N). That sent the company’s shares up more than 20%, adding $7 billion-plus to its market capitalization. It’s the ultimate attention-grabbing post.

As a measure of engagement, it’s hard to think of many posts on Twitter’s own platform that do better. One rare example might be Musk’s 2018 tweets that he was preparing to take Tesla private. Those posts sent the electric-car maker’s shares soaring. The SEC was unamused, forcing Musk to agree to let Tesla lawyers screen his posts.

Both the regulator and Twitter have come in for Musk’s ire. Musk has claimed the SEC is unfairly persecuting him. And he has tweeted about possibly creating an alternative to Twitter. Attacking how platform owners police content and threatening to move to a breakaway venue is a hallowed tradition – perhaps especially among popular posters like Musk, who has 80 million followers. He has elevated the practice by spending billions of dollars on Twitter shares…

Twitter is used to being entangled with critics. Silver Lake’s Egon Durban sits on its board after Twitter signed an agreement with the private equity firm and activist Elliott Management. Musk may stick around, tweeting as he goes along. When it comes to airing his opinions about Twitter itself, though, the SEC’s Edgar platform may have an edge.

show full post on front page

Elon Musk Is Now Twitter’s Largest Shareholder; And That’s Probably Not A Good Thing https://t.co/E39QLuox9l

— techdirt (@techdirt) April 4, 2022

Elon Musk appears to have a childlike understanding of free speech, especially with regards to how content moderation and free speech work together. But after running a silly poll a few weeks ago, many people assumed that the reason Musk was agitating to see if people felt that Twitter “supported” free speech, was that he might try to buy the company. It turns out, he was already in the process of trying to do so. On Monday it was announced that Musk has accumulated nearly 10% of Twitter’s shares, via some pocket change, making him the single largest shareholder in the company…

It’s unclear, in the short term, what that will mean for the company. It’s not clear, for example, that Musk will get a board seat or become a particularly active board member, but given his agitating, and the way he’s handled some of his other companies, it wouldn’t be much of a surprise if he does end up becoming quite active…

Again, I think Musk deserves praise for driving some innovations forward, and having a unique vision on how to execute on big, challenging scientific problems — like sending rockets into space and building electric cars, among other things. But managing speech is not a scientific or engineering problem. It’s a human challenge. And Musk does not exactly have the greatest of track records in showing empathy, or, frankly, common decency.

When the initial rumors were that Musk might start a competing social network, I was at least intrigued to see how that might compete with something like Twitter. But I do wonder how much his naïve take on speech might do serious harm to Twitter…

Musk buying nearly 10% of Twitter is the rare realpolitik move for a guy who likes to style himself a "memelord."

This platform, and the public imagination more broadly, is as central to his success as anything to do with the engineering of EVs or rockets. Much more, actually.

— E.W. Niedermeyer (@Tweetermeyer) April 4, 2022


From a long, thoughtful thread:

Musk buying nearly 10% of Twitter is the rare realpolitik move for a guy who likes to style himself a “memelord.”

This platform, and the public imagination more broadly, is as central to his success as anything to do with the engineering of EVs or rockets. Much more, actually.

Investing in the engine of growth for his personal empire shows that Musk doesn’t just want to be the world’s greatest showman (or “personal brand,” as well call them now). He wants to own the biggest venue, so now anyone replicating his playbook has to go through him.

Musk’s real industrial work, the things he has most fundamentally transformed in his diverse career, exists in the minds and imaginations of the public. His magic trick is “memeing” perception into reality, and Twitter is critical infrastructure for that.

But like a lot of his boldest plays, Musk seems to be firing from the hip on this. He’s already framed his engagement with Twitter around the issue of “free speech,” which is a world-historical level meme, but one that makes this adventure fraught with challenges.

I’m skeptical that he feels the need to tilt the Twitter playing field even further to the benefit of his posting, or the fortunes of his companies. He’s already gotten away with posts others have been banned for, and his investors are infamously active evangelists on here.

That said, Musk’s actions make it incredibly clear that he does NOT believe in free speech and that he is incredibly sensitive to media coverage of himself and his companies. But framing his Twitter investment as a free speech move then pursuing obvious self-interest won’t play.

What buying into Twitter as a free speech crusader does do is entrench him further as an icon of the post-Trump American right, for whom the power of Silicon Valley over online speech is a major issue. Long straddling the culture war divide, Musk is now seriously taking sides…

There will be plenty of time to say more about all this, but for now I’ll conclude with a message to my friends in the media: please start taking Musk’s history of “stealth PR” more seriously. It’s a tough subject to research, but there’s much there the public needs to know now.

Twitter options trades ahead of Musk disclosure raise analysts' eyebrows https://t.co/Tn1C0sbjTa pic.twitter.com/iAwL1lCwMM

— Reuters (@Reuters) April 5, 2022

Twitter closed up 27% after Elon Musk took a 9.2% stake in the company https://t.co/uJnUIspoa5 pic.twitter.com/kZ3fnEFabk

— Bloomberg (@business) April 4, 2022

Re: Elon Musk becoming the biggest Twitter shareholder pic.twitter.com/X6lF1mrChY

— Edward Ongweso Jr (@bigblackjacobin) April 4, 2022

Late Night Open Thread: Musk Buys Into TwitterPost + Comments (16)

  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 13
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

VA Purple House Delegates

Donate

Political Action

Postcard Writing Information

Recent Comments

  • RaflW on Secret Speaker (Open Thread) (Oct 3, 2023 @ 4:43pm)
  • SiubhanDuinne on Secret Speaker (Open Thread) (Oct 3, 2023 @ 4:43pm)
  • eversor on Secret Speaker (Open Thread) (Oct 3, 2023 @ 4:43pm)
  • Yarrow on Secret Speaker (Open Thread) (Oct 3, 2023 @ 4:43pm)
  • Elizabelle on Secret Speaker (Open Thread) (Oct 3, 2023 @ 4:42pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
What Has Biden Done for You Lately?

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Cole & Friends Learn Español

Introductory Post
Cole & Friends Learn Español

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc