I Took All of His Money and I Brought it Home to Jenny

My aim is to create thoughtful, interesting, high minded and unique music criticism here. And so, in that spirit, here’s my top four songs with guitars that sound like bagpipes!

1. In a Big Country – Big Country (1983)
2. Whiskey in the Jar – Thin Lizzy (1973)
3. Under the Milky Way – The Church (1988)
4. Run Runaway -Slade (1983)

 We can see that there is quite a spike in guitars that sound like bagpipes in 1983. “In a Big Country” is the best of the bunch, imo. Great pop song but I note that it owes a debt to its Hibernian cousin recorded ten years before. It seems we just accepted what was put before us in music videos in the early days. Were we just not picky about plot and continuity? I can’t for the life of me puzzle out what’s going on here.

Ach, the skirling! My real name is comically Scottish and I actually took bagpipe lessons around the time I took up the guitar. There are a loads of crazy grace notes you have to learn in order to play traditional Highland pipes. I remember one of the graces was called the “Bubbly D.” And that’s about all I remember. Had things turned out a little differently…I’m pretty sure I still would have stuck with the guitar.

I’m quite busy this afternoon cleaning the house from top to bottom because we are hosting a phone banking party. For whom, I am unsure. There’s a lot of campaigns swirling around our little group right now. Do you want to help a campaign? Well, you’ve come to the right thermometer because this here one is for the fund that’s split between all eventual Democratic nominees in House districts currently held by Republicans.

Goal Thermometer

Gates going down

and from a trained observer and commenter we get some rapid reaction:

Update 1 The false statement charge refers to a Member of Congress in 2013. Is that relevant? If so, who would it be?

UPDATE 1B: The Congress critter is most likely Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) and Putin stooge

Good Guy with a Gun “Never Went In”

Steve Israel, the Sheriff of Broward County, announced last night that the deputy assigned to Stoneman Douglas waited for four minutes outside the building where the shooting was happening and did not go in. That deputy took retirement yesterday. German Lopez at Vox drills in on whether good guys with guns can do anything at a mass shooting:

The fundamental problem is that mass shootings are traumatizing, terrifying events. Without potentially dozens or even hundreds of hours in training, most people are not going to be able to control their emotions and survey the scene in time to quickly and properly respond.

“There’s never enough training,” Coby Briehn, a senior instructor at Advanced Law Enforcement Rapid Response Training, told Klepper. “You can never get enough.”

The FBI’s analysis of active shooters between 2000 and 2013 has another relevant data point: “Law enforcement suffered casualties in 21 (46.7%) of the 45 incidents where they engaged the shooter to end the threat.” These are people trained to do this kind of thing full time, and nearly half were wounded or killed.

Facts don’t matter, so I’m sure Trump and the NRA will keep fucking the chicken when it comes to arming teachers.

Knees, balls and bullets — or young invincible risks

A friend of the blog e-mailed me a question about short term plans and young invincibles:

At age 30, what conditions would, a) have a >~1% chance of occurring, b) will cost you >$25K OOP, and c) get covered under those shitty plans. Presumably a young, invinicible would want to know that.

As I read through, my former 30 yo self is saying, self, “why are you spending $150/mos?” The coverage is not worth a thing?

This is a damn good question. There are very few things that meet all criteria. Young adults who can pass underwriting are basically insuring against meteors.

I have one caveat, not all underwritten plans are inherently bad. Some are, some aren’t. Let’s assume that the rest of the answer is for someone on a non-scam underwritten plan that actually offers “decent” coverage where the pricing advantage is mostly based on excluding people highly likely to need services instead of excluding massive sections of services.

I can think of three immediate scenarios where a healthy late 20 something male could run up a $25,000 charge that would be covered under most underwritten plans.

In an odd way, I was a semi-professional athlete. I paid the mortgage on my house by refereeing and then I started to pay for day care for a child by refereeing as I ended my twenties and entered my thirties. I had my fair share of injuries: hip flexors, ankle sprains, and plantar fasciasitis were the injuries that slowed me down the most. I pushed myself hard but I pulled back when I had a soft tissue injury because I would rather lose a week or two of a season to rest and physical therapy than a season or two to surgery. Thankfully lots of things stretched and strained but nothing popped.

ACL’s popping was always a concern. I lucked out as an ACL replacement can easily cost between $20,000 to $50,000 without insurance. Things going pop in the knees is a risk for young invincibles. If it is done in an athletic compeition, some underwritten plans may exclude coverage but this is still a risk during snow shoveling.

Jamison Taillon, a starting pitcher for the Pittsburgh Pirates, missed a good chunk of last year because he had testicular cancer. He is 25. Testicular cancer is fairly common for younger men. It is not a disease of old age.

Finally, and to be morbid, people get shot. It is not hard for the first day of emergency treatment to run up $30,000 in charges. Any rehabilitation or complications can push total charges into the six figures quickly.

These were the first three scenarios that I would have told my 29 year old self if I had to convince him to get insurance even if it was underwritten insurance with some exclusions. I am still mainly insuring myself against unknown meteors hitting me in the head, and those were three meteors that crossed my orbit.

Friday Morning Open Thread: CPAC, Reliable Point’n’Mock Post Topic

Daniel Dale, at Toronto’s The Star:

For decades, CPAC was a gathering Republicans attended to rail against long-standing conservative villains like overreaching government. In the Donald Trump era, they have largely been superseded by other enemies.

This year’s CPAC still offers moments of old-fashioned conservative orthodoxy. But it is being joined by a large dose of the loose philosophy that might be best called Trumpism.

On Thursday, speakers griped about the FBI. They darkly warned about Muslims. They made fun of transgender people. They held a panel on “fake news.” And, one after the other, they hailed the wondrousness of a year-old era that Vice-President Mike Pence claimed was “the most consequential year in the history of the conservative movement.”

At a gathering normally heavy on Republican legislators, only one, Sen. Ted Cruz, was on the speaker roster. In their place this year were Trump administration officials and Trump-friendly others: Fox News hosts, a Breitbart News editor, campus rabble-rousers fighting “political correctness,” far-right Europeans…

Just as it was a hallmark of Trump rallies, media criticism was a prominent feature of the new CPAC. The first video of the day was a compilation of clips of television anchors admitting errors or being mocked by Trump and Fox personalities as “fake news.”

The first panel was titled “An Affair to Remember: How the Far Left and the Mainstream Media Got in Bed Together.” In a sharp reversal from the usual Republican argument, which holds that cloistered media elites do not leave their northeastern bubble to speak with average Trump supporters in forgotten communities, one speaker, Candace Owens, complained that CNN too frequently interviewed Trump supporters who “had no teeth.”

They wanted to make Trump supporters look “stupid,” she said

*Not* a heavy lift, lady. Easy enough even for effete coastal BothSiderists!