• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

It’s possible to be a liberal firebrand without crapping on the party.

Giving up is unforgivable.

Stay strong, because they are weak.

Putting aside our relentless self-interest because the moral imperative is crystal clear.

I’d like to think you all would remain faithful to me if i ever tried to have some of you killed.

The “burn-it-down” people are good with that until they become part of the kindling.

’Where will you hide, Roberts, the laws all being flat?’

Seems like a complicated subject, have you tried yelling at it?

There are some who say that there are too many strawmen arguments on this blog.

There are no moderate republicans – only extremists and cowards.

The republican speaker is a slippery little devil.

Pessimism assures that nothing of any importance will change.

Everything is totally normal and fine!!!

Conservatism: there are people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

You can’t attract Republican voters. You can only out organize them.

When do we start airlifting the women and children out of Texas?

Let me eat cake. The rest of you could stand to lose some weight, frankly.

The most dangerous place for a black man in America is in a white man’s imagination.

When I was faster i was always behind.

These days, even the boring Republicans are nuts.

Roe is not about choice. It is about freedom.

If you tweet it in all caps, that makes it true!

That meeting sounds like a shotgun wedding between a shitshow and a clusterfuck.

Donald Trump found guilty as fuck – May 30, 2024!

Mobile Menu

  • 2026 Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2026 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Archives for Politics / America

America

Revolutionary Warfare=Guerrilla Warfare+Political Action

by Adam L Silverman|  November 7, 20248:03 pm| 220 Comments

This post is in: Activist Judges!, America, Crazification Factor, Domestic Politics, National Security, Open Threads, Organizing & Resistance, Politics, Silverman on Security

I’m going to keep this short as I still have to do the Ukraine war update later and I’m very fried from work despite this being day 1 of my mini-staycation.

I want to make this very clear at the outset, this is not a victory lap. It is not an I told you so. I really don’t want to have to write this post at all. I am no happier than any of you.

Let’s start with where we are now.

Where we are now is a revolutionary movement that revolves around a revanchist, reactionary racist, antisemitic, Islamophobic, misogynist, homophobic, xenophobic, nativist, isolationist, and (white) Christian nationalist ideology fused with a cult of personality around the President-elect will soon have control of the executive branch, the Senate, most likely the House, the Supreme Court, a number of the federal appellate courts, and 25 state trifectas.

I think the model or heuristic for understanding what the President-elect’s second term will be like is a combination of two historical examples. The first is Yeltsin and Putin. Yeltsin was old, ill, and infirm from both his alcoholism and other health issues. Putin was an ambitious, angry, revanchist backed by (owned) by powerful and ultra-high net worth individuals. I think this is an apt description for the dynamic between Trump and Vance. History rhymes, it does not repeat, so this does not mean that Vance will eventually be president for life or anything.

The second is the fascist co-president that George Herbert Walker, Prescott Bush, and their co-conspirators wanted to force onto FDR in the first months of his first term of office in what is called the Business Plot. Vance is the vehicle for the current equivalents of Walker, Bush, and their co-conspirators – Thiel, Musk, the Uhliens, Zuckerberg, Bezos, etc – to quietly achieve their goals in the background while the President-elect does whatever he’s going to do in the foreground.

There is also going to be a LOT of chaos. Not everyone that is going to get a senior political appointment is on the same page. They all have their own agendas. There is going to be jockeying for position, the President-elect’s family members, including in-laws, are all going to want their pieces of the action or, at least ill gotten gains. And given how we’ve been watching the President-elect very visibly decline in real time over the past two months, there will be infighting over who is his actual, real successor. I fully expect the President-elect and his team to shiv RFK Jr as they don’t need him anymore.

The fight to be his successor will begin almost immediately. The President-elect’s movement is a cult of personality. But there’s no actual heir apparent to him. None of his children have what his followers see in him and want, which is a combination of anger, spite, bigotry, and entertainment. Same with other GOP officials and MAGA movement conservative elites and notables. Vance, DeStupid, Cotton, Scott, Cruz, etc all have the anger, spite, and bigotry, but they’re not entertaining. Youngkin is just boring. He presents as normal. With the exception of his youngest son, whom we only see so we have no idea if he can do entertaining, the President-elect’s other children don’t have the entertainment value and come off as whiny and spoiled, because they are whiny and spoiled. Stephen Miller has the anger, spite, and bigotry down to a science, but the President-elect’s movement isn’t going to move their allegiance to him because he’s Jewish. Musk is not entertaining at all. He’s just a black hole of entitled, coddled, failed his way upward neediness. Thiel hits the same repellent cords as Rick Scott. Tucker Carlson and Marjorie Taylor Green seem to hit all the characteristics like the President-elect, and as I’ve speculated here before I could see either of them making a play for his mantle, but I don’t know if either could or would pull it off.

After the jump I’m going to go through how we got here and why I thought it was likely we would get here.

show full post on front page

Sunday night – 2 NOV – Cole texted and asked:

Are you feeling more or less confident about the election?

This was my answer with light copy editing (emphasis mine):

Mixed. Harris, Walz, and most of her team have done a great job. Anita Dunn and the other legacy 3rd way/triangulation asshats they got saddled with by Biden are making their usual milquetoast mess.

And Nate Cohn from 538 came out today and basically said that since the pollsters screwed up their models so badly in 2016 and 2020, no matter how good the results are for Harris or Dems in the raw returns, they’re reweighing everything to either go 50-50 or lean Trump.

What worries me is all the same things that haven’t changed. Extreme gerrymanders, voter suppression, voter purging, McConnell’s and Leo’s packed federal appellate and supreme courts, ultra-high net worth asshole’s money (Musk, Mellon,. Adelson, Thiel, Uhlien, etc), law enforcement being all on board not just with Trump, but with using violence on his behalf, and the subversion of municipal and state election boards and staff over the past four years through violence, the threats of violence, and the establishment of a competitive system of control.

I’m not sure that all of those structural worries can be overcome by an excellent campaign, excellent ground game, and excellent enthusiasm.

And I didn’t even get to the Russian, Israeli, PRC, DPRK, Sauid, Emirati, and Iranian interference on Trump’s behalf.

I’m cautiously optimistic, but very concerned.

The reason I was very concerned, the reason I had written here many times since 2022 that what has happened was going to happen, is that I was using a different model to try to understand what was and is going on. Specifically, Bernard Fall’s model of revolutionary warfare:

Revolutionary Warfare=Guerrilla Warfare+Political Action (RW=GW+PA)

Counter-Revolutionary Warfare=Counter-Guerrilla Warfare+Counter-Political Action+Civic Action (CRW=CGW+CPA+CA)

As I wrote last night, what you all did here was amazing! You should be proud as hell of what you did. But what you all did was civic action and civic action along cannot counter what we have been and are experiencing.

Almost none of the elected and appointed officials who were supposed to do the Counter-Guerrilla Warfare and the Counter-Political Action did. DOJ, DHS, FBI, etc are all still missing in action. The few who tried, like the Colorado Secretary of State in invoking the 14th Amendment, had their Counter-Political Action countered by the Supreme Court.

Nothing was actually done to stop the people who actually planned the insurrection and attack on the Capitol on 6 January 2021. We’ve got about 575 nobodies and about two dozen senior Oath Keepers and Proud Boys arrested, charged, tried, convicted, and mostly sentenced. The President-elect, his senior aides and trusted agents, the dozen or so Republican members of the House, and the 1/2 dozen Republican senators who we know actually planned the events of that day because we have them on news video going to and leaving the White House where it was being planned have never been and will never be held to account. These folks are an insider threat. They were not deterred because nothing was actually done to deter to them. And, as a result, the revolt that we all watched on 6 January 2021 never ended. It is still ongoing led by the same senior GOP elected and appointed officials involved in its planning. As a result, a revolutionary government will be sworn in and take control of the US in January 2025.

Counter-Revolutionary Warfare=Counter-Guerrilla Warfare+Counter-Political Action+Civic Action.

Open thread!

Revolutionary Warfare=Guerrilla Warfare+Political ActionPost + Comments (220)

It Wasn’t a Leak, It Was A Provocation and a Feint!

by Adam L Silverman|  May 6, 20224:55 pm| 194 Comments

This post is in: Activist Judges!, America, Crazification Factor, Domestic Politics, Healthcare, Justice, LGBTQ Rights, LGBTQ Rights Are Human Rights, Open Threads, Politics, Racial Justice, Silverman on Security, The War On Women, Women's Rights, Women's Rights Are Human Rights

By now everyone has developed their own pet theory on who leaked the draft opinion in Dobbs V Mississippi, why it was leaked, etc. And a lot of really smart and good people are trying to get the news media gatekeepers – The NY Times for the mainstream, whatever mainstream actually means in 2022, and Fox News for the conservatives, whatever conservative actually means in 2022 too – to focus on the real issue, which is that at least five Republican Federalist Society backed appointees to the Supreme Court are prepared to and will overturn Roe and Casey and do so in a way that is intended to set up pretty much everything else back the Civil War amendments to also be overturned. Obergefell, Griswold, Loving, Brown, the Civil Rights Act, whatever’s left of the Voting Rights Act, everything pertaining to the New Deal, and then gutting the Civil War amendments. That’s the substantive story. Flat stop. Don’t pass go.

show full post on front page

Up to this point the news media has failed to focus on the substantive, real story.

And that’s because their was a strategy in the leak. It wasn’t a leak, it was a feint and a provocation!

On the night that the draft decision leaked and the next day I was texting about it with TaMara, BettyC, and Tom Levenson. One of the points I made was this was done by the conservative majority on the Supreme Court – an idea that has now become something of common wisdom. But it was done so as part of a defined strategy. That strategy has four lines of effort:

  1. Make it harder, if not impossible, for Chief Justice Roberts to peel off Kavanaugh and maybe one of the other junior justices for his compromise that allows the Mississippi fifteen week limit to go into effect, but also keeps Roe and Casey intact.
  2. Set the narrative for the news media locking it into focusing on the leak, the damage the leak does to the court, and the danger to the justices and the Constitution as a result of the leak. This is just an extension of the normal conservative sore winner, we just got what we wanted, but we’re still the real victims and being victimized schtick they’ve been working for decades.
  3. Kick off the response early. By getting everyone rightly outraged now it sets the conditions for the outrage to subside by the time the actual ruling comes out in four to six weeks, let alone by the time the midterm elections roll around in November. It is hard to sustain that level of anger and willingness to protest en masse over a sustained period of time. Think of this as normalization by exhaustion and demoralization. You can’t stop it. The Democrats don’t appear to have a strategy, let alone a tactic that will do anything but look like a failed stunt. So by November what should drive up Democratic turnout and turnout by Independents for Democrats actually doesn’t happen because everyone who was rightly outraged is now just exhausted and demoralized.
  4. Set the conditions, as part of the narrative setting in the second part of the strategy, for someone who can be tied to the Democrats or the groups and movements that support them, to do something stupid, reckless, and downright dangerously violent in order to create an astroturfed backlash to the legitimate backlash. Here’s Yahoo News republishing Fox News reporting about how liberal groups have published the conservative justices home addresses as part of promoting their followers to go protest in front of their homes. If you keyword search “liberal groups publish justices addresses roe leak” all the reporting hits, other than the Yahoo republication, return for conservative outlets like Fox and National Review.

Just briefly, lets focus on line of effort 3. Yesterday we learned the following:

https://twitter.com/NoahShachtman/status/1522392558244093952?cxt=HHwWgICzref9z6AqAAAA

And from Josh Marshall unpacking Politico‘s reporting (emphasis mine):

Last night, Politico Nightly had a somewhat ungenerous read on Democratic efforts to codify Roe. Congress Editor Elana Schor noted that Democrats are resisting efforts to join a bipartisan effort that is backed by pro-choice Senators Collins and Murkowski. That seems odd. Why wouldn’t they add those votes? The Collins and Murkowski option wouldn’t provide as fulsome protections for abortion access. But it would like get more than 50 votes rather than a vote in the high 40s. It makes the Democrats sound more interested in purity than results. So why not do that? Sen Mazie Hirono explains: since getting to 50 votes actually has no practical impact on passing the law, why not vote on a law you can enthusiastically get behind rather than a more watered down one?

That’s a pretty good logic.

But this logic illustrates the broader dead end the Democrats are walking into. These votes are often called “symbolic” votes. But that’s not an accurate description. Votes like these are test votes to frame electoral choices. You either force the opposition to make unpopular votes with the intention of campaigning on those votes in an election or — more directly — you use the votes to frame a clear electoral choice. So you tell voters, this is what is at stake in this election. Elect us and we will do this thing. As I’ve argued, in this case that means something like, give us two more Democratic senators and the House and we will codify Roe on the first day of the new Congress.

But at least so far that’s not what they’re doing. Congressional Democrats are essentially telling abortion rights supporters that they’re on their side but won’t actually be able to do anything about it regardless of the outcome of the election. They may get some benefit in reminding voters that Roe is about to be overturned because of Republicans. But since the results of the election won’t change anything there’s simply no way that can galvanize the electorate around Roe as Democrats seem (rightly) to want to do.

It’s just basic electoral physics. You can’t galvanize the election around an issue if you’re saying the results of the election will have no impact on the issue. Again, this is really obvious! You can’t both elevate an issue to extreme importance and also say there’s nothing that can be done about it — regardless of the outcome of the election. This is basic electoral physics.

More at the link!

Based on what Josh Marshall is reporting and his analysis, do you feel confident and/or enthused that the Democrats in the Senate have this? Of course you don’t because you’re not stupid. Do y0u feel confident that the failure to be able to rectify the coming injustice is going to motivate people to realize the Democrats need to keep the House majority and add two to four senators to their Senate majority so they can then fix it next January? Of course you don’t because you’re not stupid.

Now how do I know this was a coordinated provocation with a fixed strategy? Because by the time the leak occurred everyone working at Fox News, everyone appearing on Fox News to comment on the leak, every other conservative movement official or leader, conservative movement commentator or social media personality, and every Republican official all had the same talking points. There is only one person in the conservative movement who is in the senior leadership of a conservative movement group that meets to create and circulate comprehensive talking points on a regular basis to all of those listed above, who is plugged into almost every other conservative movement group in DC, and who is also tied directly to a member of the conservative wing of the Supreme Court. Her name is Ginni Thomas and the group that does the coordinated talking points is called Groundswell. Ginni Thomas also coordinates her husband’s current and former clerks through several different private electronic communication channels.

We know what the strategy is. So far they’ve succeeded with the second line of effort; they’ve locked in their preferred framing that the news is the leak, not that women’s right to bodily autonomy and therefore full citizenship is being taken away. While it’ll take a while to see if they succeed with lines of effort one and three, they’ve gotten lucky in that as of right now the Democrats don’t seem to have a strategy, tactic, or plan to actually effectively respond to what is happening and what will be happening. Finally, while we do not yet have violence directed at a justice or one of their family members, we do have the publishing of their home addresses, which will be spun as a call for it. I really do not want to have to watch what happens if someone so much as says “boo” to Alito while he’s out to dinner.

I don’t have many answers here for what to do. But I would suggest one thing. Specifically, the Democrats and the groups and movements that support them need to learn the lesson of what is being directed at Madison Cawthorn. Cawthorn is being politically killed in a slow death of a thousand cuts employing open sourced opposition research (oppo) as the knife that inflicts the wounds. There are people with the knowledge, skills, abilities, experience, and expertise who could and would do this type of work for the Democrats. Justice Thomas, Justice Kavanaugh, Justice Alito, Justice Barrett, Chief Justice Roberts (especially if the long whispered rumors are true), Senators McConnell, Graham, Cotton, (especially if the long whispered rumors are true), other GOP senators hiding equally shocking secrets, Congressman Gym Jordan (you think the showers were a one off type of thing, that this isn’t part of a pattern of behavior he’s so far been able to cover up?), Congressman Gaetz, Congresswomen Greene and Boebert, etc, etc, etc, etc. How about Pete Hegseth and his white supremacist and neo-NAZI tatoos? The rest of the staff at Fox News. Leonard Leo? There’s no way someone that creepy isn’t actually creepy, especially given the disgraced, sexually deviant Opus Dei leader who mentored him. Same Opus Dei priest by the way that is or was close to the Thomases, Alito, Scalia, Barr, etc within the DC Federalist Society and traditionalist Catholic community. Conservative movement leaders and commenters and pundits. All of them could and should be getting the Madison Cawthorn treatment right now and every day between now and November. And remember, this is all because Cawthorn publicly discussed that the GOP members of the House and Senate have drug fueled sex parties/orgies. This strategy that the GOP is employing to bring him down was not the result of his idolizing Hitler, being a scofflaw and menace to society, being poorly educated and clearly brain damaged as a result of the accident that put him the wheelchair. This strategy is being employed because he publicly talked about GOP members of the House and Senate hosting and participating in drug fueled sex parties/orgies. This tells us he was telling the truth. There’s plenty of oppo out there. All open sourced. It just has to be dug out and used.

Sure they’ll scream foul. Sure, they’ll try to target Democrats. What are they going to discover, that Congressman Raskin really needs a better shampoo and conditioner combo?

Our democratic-republic and self government is on the line. It is time to act like it.

Open thread!

It Wasn’t a Leak, It Was A Provocation and a Feint!Post + Comments (194)

To Answer Commenter Betty’s Question: I Know Rick Coplen, He’s Good People, and If I Still Lived In PA and Lived In His District I Would Both Vote For Him and Volunteer To Help Him!

by Adam L Silverman|  April 13, 20225:47 pm| 26 Comments

This post is in: America, Open Threads, Politics, Silverman on Security

BettyC just brought my attention to commenter Betty’s question from her recent post.

Betty                                                                            April 13, 2022 at 4:49 pm

A politics question for Adam if he reads this. The traitorous Congressman Scott Perry, who gets way too little coverage as a leader of the Freedon Caucus, is my Congressman in a deep red district. There are two Democrats in the primary, one is a lovely woman running on immigration reform and advocating for women and minorities, absolute losers in this district. The other one is a retired guy from the Army War College focused on education. I would like to know if Adam knows him and, if so, has any thoughts about him he would like to share. His name is Rick Coplen. I don’t want to put this in the Ukraine thread.

Normally I would avoid recommending anyone here do anything but just register to and vote. However, in this case I’m going to make an exception. I have known Rick Coplen since July 2010. He and his wife are both former colleagues who I consider to be good personal friends despite us being out of touch for several years as my career has taken some weird turns and none of those brought me back to Carlisle Barracks. I worked with both of them on several projects when I was assigned at USAWC and I can honestly say that Rick is not just good people, he’s one of the best people. He is an excellent subject matter expert in his area, he was an excellent colleague to me and everyone else as far as I know, and just an all around great person. If I was still assigned at USAWC and lived in his district I’d be voting for him and volunteering to help on his campaign. I cannot speak highly enough about him or his spouse, COL (ret) Lorelei Coplen. They went out of their way to make me feel welcome when I first arrived. Just great, great people all around. Rick is ethical, smart, and thoughtful and so is Lorelei. And they were willing to put up with me as a colleague! So patient too! Just wonderful people. And he’ll make a wonderful member of Congress!

Open thread!

To Answer Commenter Betty’s Question: I Know Rick Coplen, He’s Good People, and If I Still Lived In PA and Lived In His District I Would Both Vote For Him and Volunteer To Help Him!Post + Comments (26)

War For Ukraine: Update 2

by Adam L Silverman|  February 25, 20224:36 pm| 271 Comments

This post is in: America, Foreign Affairs, Open Threads, Russia, Silverman on Security, War, War in Ukraine

War For Ukraine: Update 2

(Found at this link)

Just a brief house keeping note at top. If I keep doing these updates, I’m going to title them War for Ukraine from here on out with the update # after the colon. I am not going to retitle the first one I did two nights ago.

About an hour ago Kyiv’s mayor, Vitali Klitschko, warned that Russian forces are closing on the city:

Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko has warned Russian troops are “very close to the capital” and predicted “a difficult night” for the city.
 
“The situation now is threatening for Kyiv, no exaggeration,” he said on his Telegram channel. “The night and the morning will be difficult.”

— Natasha Bertrand (@NatashaBertrand) February 25, 2022

🚨 Air raid warning in Kyiv. And missiles being fired on the capital. I’ve counted three large strikes in past five minutes. Watching from my window and seeing the sky light up; roar of explosions reverberating across the city.

— Christopher Miller (@ChristopherJM) February 25, 2022

President Zelenskyy has both tweeted out video of him in Kyiv to knock back Russian disinformation that he’d abandoned the city and its defense and tweeted that he’d had a discussion with President Biden about next steps:

President, his Chief of Staff, the Prime Minister, head of the Servant of the People are all in Kyiv.

We will win! 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 pic.twitter.com/1ae8hZnthC

— Oleksiy Sorokin (@mrsorokaa) February 25, 2022

Resupply of weaponry is continuing to flow into Ukraine:

⚡️BREAKING: Kyiv home guard, the 112th Territorial Defense Brigade, now operate British-provided NLAWs.
Welcome to hell, motherfuckers. pic.twitter.com/9OVuQhQkTC

— Illia Ponomarenko 🇺🇦 (@IAPonomarenko) February 25, 2022

About four hours ago, AMB (ret) McFaul, tweeted that NATO has (finally!) activated the NATO Very High Readiness Joint Task Force (VHRJTF)

Hearing now that NATO's Very High Readiness Joint Task Force (VJTF) has been activated. Excellent news.

— Michael McFaul (@McFaul) February 25, 2022

The NATO Very High Readiness Joint Task Force is:

The NATO Response Force (NRF) is a highly ready and technologically advanced multinational force made up of land, air, maritime and Special Operations Forces (SOF) components that the Alliance can deploy quickly, wherever needed. In addition to its operational role, the NRF can be used for greater cooperation in education and training, increased exercises, support for disaster relief and better use of technology.

A powerful package

NATO Allies decided at the 2014 Wales Summit to enhance the NRF by creating a “spearhead force” within it, known as the Very High Readiness Joint Task Force or VJTF. This enhanced NRF is one of the measures of the Readiness Action Plan (RAP) agreed by Allies to respond to the changes in the security environment.

The enhanced NATO Response Force includes:

  • a command and control element: Operational command of the NRF alternates between Allied Joint Force Commands in Brunssum and Naples;
  • the Very High Readiness Joint Task Force (VJTF): This NRF element – about 20,000 strong – includes a multinational land brigade of around 5,000 troops and air, maritime and SOF components. Leading elements are ready to move within two to three days. Allies assume the lead role for the VJTF on a rotational basis;

Rather than just give a run down of events, I wanted to provide a bit of analysis now that Ukraine has withstood the first two days of the invasion. That’ll be after the jump.

show full post on front page

The positive signs I’m seeing are:

  • The Ukrainians appear to be very motivated, for obvious reasons.
  • Zelenskyy has risen to the occasion. As have the Klitschko brothers and other Ukrainian leaders, elites, and notables.
  • The Ukrainian military is performing well so far.
  • The Snake Island defenders and the retaking of the airport outside of Kyiv are going to be huge for military and civilian morale.
  • As is the MiG 29 pilot or pilots flying sorties over Kyiv and now known as The Ghost of Kyiv.
  • As of now, based on numbers from the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense, the Ukrainians are inflicting almost 8 killed in action (KIA) on the Russians for every Ukrainian KIA. This too will be a big morale booster for the Ukrainians.
  • Russian troops, including at least one whole unit, are surrendering. Again a major morale booster.

My concerns:

  • Putin has committed only half of his forces so far. He still has plenty of reserves to throw at Ukraine.
  • He has also been much more restrained than expected in use of AirPower, his missiles, and cyber warfare.
  • I would very much like to know why he has held back.

I want to build out the killed in action line of analysis a bit. After the first day of fighting, the reporting was that the Ukrainians had killed 800 Russian Soldiers while suffering only 137 KIAs. By last night eastern time, the reporting was that the Ukrainians had killed an additional 2,000 Russian Soldiers bringing the total to 2,800. I have not seen an update to the Ukrainian KIA totals after the second day. I’ve also seen the numbers as 400 Russian KIA after the first day of fighting. Even if the lower number is the accurate one, and I don’t think it is, this would be 4 Russian Soldiers killed for just over every one Ukrainian Soldier killed. And while the Russians definitely have more Soldiers massed on Ukraine’s borders to throw at the Ukrainians, this is still a huge imbalance in favor of the Ukrainians. The reason I think the higher number may be more accurate is that the Russian Health Ministry has issued a nation wide mobilization of Russian doctors, nurses, and other medical person for a “mass medical emergency” event in Russia, but the orders make it clear this will be official travel. I think that this reporting is a good indicator that the Russian casualty numbers that Ukraine’s MOD is putting out are pretty close to accurate. And that Putin never expected this type of resistance from the Ukrainians or for it to be this effective. Comparative context here is important. The US lost 4,431 personnel in Iraq as of 19 JUL 2021. It is being reported that the Russians have lost almost 2/3rds of that in two days! Even if the number is half what is being reported, that is still an amazing number of KIAs in just two days.

Given the time difference, another long sleepless night has fallen on Ukraine. While we wait for more news of Ukraine’s defense, here’s some of what is giving inspiration to the Ukrainians defending their homes right now.

The Snake Island Defenders:

https://twitter.com/WUTangKids/status/1497003030843117571

The Ghost of Kyiv:

#Kyiv #Ukraine pic.twitter.com/wSMpbhS7cY

— Aldin 🇧🇦 (@aldin_aba) February 24, 2022

#Kyiv pic.twitter.com/gcqAqq1t4T

— Aldin 🇧🇦 (@aldin_aba) February 24, 2022

One Grandma that has no fucks left to give!

Російські окупаційні війська зайшли в місто Геніческ.⁰Відео спілкування з російським загарбником розмістила на своїй сторінці в соцмережі ФБ місцева мешканка.⁰На відео російський військовий не відповідає на питання,яка мета його перебування в місті. ⁰Відео з’явилось о 13:28. pic.twitter.com/Lp95AJu1Tk

— НепоганаТетяна (@ian_tanya) February 24, 2022

https://twitter.com/Jazmo0712/status/1497168753884344323

Finally, this was tweeted out yesterday by a Canadian diplomat:

The biggest test in @NATO's history is at hand.

Putin is the aggressor our alliance was created to defend against.

He is engaged in a pivotal war of conquest.

The fight to defend Euro-Atlantic values is happening right now, in Ukraine.#ArmUkraine #shelteroursky #NFZ

— Chris Alexander 🇨🇦🌻 (@calxandr) February 25, 2022

If you believe this is a fight to defend Euro-Atlantic values, then fight. I get that President Biden has to run the traps here at home given the domestic political situation, as well as the ones with our EU allies and partners because some of them seem to have gotten some selective amnesia over the past 70 years. So this isn’t a complaint about what the administration is or is not doing because I understand the process, but Putin has made it clear that this is step 1. If he succeeds, he’ll consolidate, take time to rebuild, then its the Baltics. Then try to repeat the cycle in Poland. Then try to repeat the cycle again in the Caucasus.

Right now we have someone who is willing to be the tip of the spear partner in this fight. The Ukrainians are dug in, holding beyond anything I think anyone could’ve imagined on Monday. Their president is begging us, daring us, shaming us to commit. The big ask is denial of flight over Ukraine to Russian military air assets. That’s it. Fine, we can’t use NATO assets because of Putin’s ambiguity and threats. We can’t use the Finns or the Swedes for the same reason. I get it. What the fuck are the Israelis and the Jordanians doing this week? You can’t tell me King Abdullah wouldn’t put on his flight suit for this. If we can’t get a single non-NATO, non-EU partner to actually run interference for us on this, providing the necessary fig leaf, we need a complete rethink of our entire defense alliance concept.

For those worried about Putin’s ambiguous threats, the DOD has determined it’s a bluff.

A shred of good news. Asked about Putin seemingly alluding to the threat of nuclear force, a senior U.S. defense official says this:

"I want to caveat this by saying we can't know perfect detail about their strategic posture. But we don't see an increased threat in that regard."

— Dan Lamothe (@DanLamothe) February 24, 2022

If we have reasonably concluded it is a bluff then we need to rise to the occasion the way the Ukrainians are. We find some way to deny flight. We find a way to hit the damn hypersonics we believe Putin put in Kaliningrad as a threat to our EU allies’ capitols to freeze our decision making to remove that threat. But we don’t sit around, claim that NATO is the strongest military alliance in history, while all NATO can do is hold meetings while its member states impose sanctions that may or may not be effective. If Putin’s invasion of Ukraine is the threat that everyone is saying it is, then we must rise to meet it. Right now the most unlikely of national leaders, President Zelenskyy is doing so. Right now the Ukrainian military and Ukrainian citizens are doing so. Maybe, just maybe we and our NATO and EU allies should do so ourselves.

Open thread!

War For Ukraine: Update 2Post + Comments (271)

Breaking: Putin Has Informed Macron and Scholz That He Will Recognize the Donetsk and Luhansk Republics

by Adam L Silverman|  February 21, 20221:45 pm| 296 Comments

This post is in: America, Foreign Affairs, Military, Open Threads, Russia, Silverman on Security, War, War in Ukraine

For those who have been patting themselves on the back that diplomacy was working so a military buildup for both deterrence and, if the worst should happen, response was not needed, well your diplomacy just failed!

Putin is expected to make an address to the Russian nation any minute now. Scheduled for 9pm Moscow time but he’s usually late.

— Christopher Miller (@ChristopherJM) February 21, 2022

What does this mean, well given the rhetoric and statements coming out of Moscow, most likely this:

Something to be worried about: Russian Interior Minister Kolokoltsev told Putin that Moscow should recognize all of Donetsk and Luhansk regions as D/LNR. He said, “from Mariupol and ending with those historical borders.” So all the gray area in this OSCE map. Frontline is red. pic.twitter.com/j8bhHUHd6J

— Christopher Miller (@ChristopherJM) February 21, 2022

Translation: Russia may very well annex Luhansk and Donbas. https://t.co/eoXY0wbtdm

— Terrell Jermaine Starr (@terrelljstarr) February 21, 2022

https://twitter.com/wiczipedia/status/1495828398597611520

We are going to have to wait and see what the actual recognition statement that Putin makes states, but if they recognize all of the Donetsk and Luhansk breakaway territories, it would double the territory Russia has grabbed in eastern Ukraine and put the current line of control right in the middle of Russia’s two newest vassal states. From Putin’s perspective this would, of course, turn the Ukrainian military forces on that line of control into invaders of the sovereign territories of Donetsk and Luhansk. Territory that Russia has pledged to defend. This is the final, fabricated pretext for war.

What do the two diplomatic geniuses Macron and Scholz have to say for themselves?

BREAKING: Germany's Scholz and France's Macron expressed 'disappointment' over Putin's recognition of the independence of Donetsk and Lugansk republics

— The Spectator Index (@spectatorindex) February 21, 2022

Well that’ll put Putin in his place! And a lot of Ukrainians are going to die because of it.

As much as I like the way Biden and his team have handled things so far, especially the information warfare and PSYOP campaign that has gotten inside Putin’s information cycle and wrong footed him, Zelensky, in his speech to the Munich Security Conference, was not wrong about how the US, the EU, and NATO have handled this crisis. And not just for the past several months, but going back to at least Spring of 2014.

If the US and our NATO and non-NATO EU allies and partners wait until Putin escalates and reinvades/further invades to take actions to punish him then simply announcing you will won’t deter him. And as we’ve seen they haven’t deterred him! Especially if either we or our NATO and EU allies have already taken the most powerful tools off the table. We’re not going to cut Russia off from SWIFT. We’re not going to use every last bit of our FINCEN capabilities and our allies’ equivalents to scarf up or seize every last one of Putin’s assets, his family’s assets, and those of his oligarchs and their families. We’re not going to revoke visas and green cards. We’re not going to cut Russia off from the Internet. We’re not going to deny flight into or out of Russia and his vassal states of Belarus, Kazakhstan, or Chechnya or make it impossible for flight between them. We’re not going to put an embargo on ground and sea lines of commerce against Russia and Putin’s vassals.

While doing any of these preemptively might focus Putin’s mind, the reality is they are acts of war in and of themselves. So we won’t do them because waging a war for the right reasons, which engaging Russia to deter its aggression in Eastern Europe would be, is not something we can do because of Afghanistan and Iraq something something, harrumph.

We love applying sanctions because it sounds tough, but it never works. If it did Cuba and Iran would both be a democratic paradise.

And we’re sure as hell not going to put the military foot print in place to give him pause and by the time he does attack a NATO state, which will be Poland to connect Belarus and Kaliningrad where he’ll claim, despite it being bullshit, his actions are to protect ethnic Russians in the northeastern tip of Poland between the two who are being targeted because they’re ethnic Russians, we’ll be so far right of boom that the military response will be that much more prolonged and deadly because we’ll have to fight onto the objectives to clear them. And that’s provided we actually do anything and don’t remain frozen by Russia’s anecdotally articulated doctrine on using tactical nukes in conventional war despite it not being in their formal doctrine.

Russia has been waging war in Ukraine since 2014. They’ve been waging war in Georgia since 2008. They’ve been waging a low intensity and unconventional war against the US and our EU and NATO partners since between 2011 and 2014.

Perhaps reality will finally overtake wishful thinking. The time for the semantic games of whether what Putin has been doing and is doing is really war or is just warfare or something something cyber crime has long passed. Putin has made it clear by his actions and, often, by his words, regardless of what is or is not really motivating him, that he seeks to roll back everything that has happened within the global systems since the Soviet Union collapsed. And, if possible, the whole post World War II international order. Regardless of why, Putin is going to do what he’s going to do. Right now he is the driver of these events and we have to wait and see where he steers things.

The only question now is whether we have the will to stop him.

Open thread!

Breaking: Putin Has Informed Macron and Scholz That He Will Recognize the Donetsk and Luhansk RepublicsPost + Comments (296)

If Our Civil Society Were Functional, Joe Rogan Would Be Going Through Some Things

by Adam L Silverman|  February 3, 20227:58 pm| 169 Comments

This post is in: America, Crazification Factor, Glibertarianism, Open Threads, Popular Culture, Silverman on Security

As I’m sure many of you know, there’s been a major to do regarding Spotify because it has a $100 million deal with Joe Rogan to stream him basically sitting around and bullshitting with guests on his eponymous podcast talk show. Specifically because he and his guests are very public assholes who spew all sorts of misinformation. Especially about COVID. For some reason unbeknownst to me people enjoy listening to Rogan and his guest engage in banal blather. I gather that it is because Rogan is good at just working the mic, but for the love of someone’s/anyone’s/no one’s (for the atheists among us) Deity or Deities (for the polytheists), listen to music or an audiobook or a history podcast* when exercising or commuting. Have some self respect people! As a result Neil Young; Nils Lofgren; Crosby, Stills, and Nash (and I would assume Young given he started the response); India ArieIndi, and several other artists have pulled or are seeking to pull their music from Spotify. Given that Spotify doesn’t pay them bupkis when someone streams their music on the platform, their actions have also brought attention to the fact that Spotify doesn’t pay them bupkis when someone streams their music on the platform.

While all of this has been ongoing I’ve been sitting back and waiting for the other shoe factory to drop. I figured given the amount of hours that Rogan spends flapping his gums on his show, somewhere in that mess of video was him saying something really offensive. And once someone took them time to listen to all of that bullshitting they’d find it and post it. And this morning, when looking for something dealing with misinformation unrelated to 50 plus year old gym rats with $100 million podcasts who are abusing Human Growth Hormone (The ginormous heads that got bigger as adults are the give away; you think Barry Bonds or Roger Stone’s or Matt Gaetz’s or Joe Rogan’s noggins got that way from testosterone supplementation? It did not!) I found that shoe factory.

The folks who tweet as PatriotTakes went through his oeuvre, rediscovered a large amount of Rogan saying exceedingly offensive things about Black people, and then posted it in a thread. This includes repeated uses of the “N” word. There was also an all too cute response about someone teaching their dog to do the NAZI salute. And, of course, insensitive and offensive remarks regarding Africa and AIDs.

Here’s the link to the thread with the videos. The tweets include some transcription of Rogan’s racist and anti-Semitic remarks. This is your warning not to play them, watch them, and/or listen to them if this stuff bothers you to watch and listen too!

India Arie has told Spotify that the reason she wants her music pulled from the streaming service is specifically so as to not subsidize Rogan’s racism. And she’s made it clear she’s not calling for Rogan to be fired.

She also said she believes that the controversial podcaster has the right to say anything he wants to say – but she believes that goes both ways.

Arie points out that artists like her make 0.003% of the money generated from Spotify. She asks for her music to be taken off the platform specifically because she doesn’t want money she makes for them to go towards what she believes to be problematic and racist.

The singer also included a 30-second video of Rogan saying the N-word over and over again throughout the years openly on several podcasts and interviews. Arie clarifies her thoughts “[Joe Rogan] shouldn’t even be uttering the [n-]word. Don’t even say it, under any context. That’s where I stand. I have always stood there.”

I have no idea what Spotify is going to do. It’s owner isn’t a US citizen and doesn’t live in the US so he’s pretty well insulated from the fallout on this in the US as long as people keep subscribing to Rogan’s podcast and others don’t abandon the service en masse. If this was happening at a major American outlet, I’d expect Rogan would either be fired or told to issue a contrite statement, resign, and drop out of site for a bit. But given that Spotify is owned by a non-American and the owner, Daniel Ek’s response has been weak sauce so far, I don’t expect much. Especially given the fact that Rogan’s listener base is basically douchebros, so I wouldn’t expect that they’ll abandon him.

Regardless, given the resurfacing of racist remarks and statements, including an attempt at genteel racism meant as a compliment that Rogan was unable to stick the landing on (the third tweet in the thread) because he’s not educated or polished enough to pull it off, I expect that Rogan will go through some things. Or, rather, that he should be facing the consequences of his past actions and statements. But that, of course, would require a much more mature and functional civil society than the US has.

* Don’t listen to true crime podcasts. They’re exploitative of other people’s suffering or bad fortune and are often full of the same propaganda the police push into news reporting about crime and law enforcement. Be better than that.

If Our Civil Society Were Functional, Joe Rogan Would Be Going Through Some ThingsPost + Comments (169)

The Strategist’s & Policy Maker’s Dilemma: Assumption of Risk

by Adam L Silverman|  January 29, 20228:43 pm| 77 Comments

This post is in: America, Foreign Affairs, Military, Open Threads, Russia, Silverman on Security, War, War in Ukraine

In the comments to my post on Russia and Ukraine last night several people asked why I was very explicit about the force posture I would like to see happen to deter Russian aggression in Europe and against Ukraine. These were all excellent questions and they deserve a bit of attention and a response in something more than just a comment. Here’s what I wrote:

And this is why I think we are still moving far too slowly and are far too late in placing the necessary assets in place to back up our diplomacy and our use of economic power to try to deter Putin. Right now Putin is getting what he wants: bilateral recognition and negotiation with the US. Putin believes Russia is still a great power the way the Soviet Union was during the Cold War. Being able to negotiate with the US, publicly demand written answers – as if formal diplomatic communication would be done some other way – and then receive them because that’s simply how diplomacy is done allows Putin to claim that victory. In order to deter him, he has to be shown that we have the will and the capability to respond. Deploying some Operational Detachments Alpha and putting the equivalent of a brigade combat team and a half on standby is not going to cut it.

In order to actually demonstrate that we have the will and the capability to respond we would need to mobilize and deploy V Corps and all of 1st Armored Division (all combat brigades and the division artillery), plussed up with one brigade combat team each from 4th Infantry Division, 101st Airborne Division/Air Assault, the 82 Airborne Division, and the 1st Stryker Regiment. This should be accompanied by a country team from the 853rd Civil Affairs Brigade with a full complement of Civil Affairs Teams Alpha (CAT-As) and a country team from the 4th Psychological Operations Group’s 6th Psychological Operations Battalion to place Tactical PSYOP Teams (TPTs) into theater. I’d put the Corps headquarters in Poland, the Division headquarters in either Finland or Estonia, and distribute the conventional forces throughout Poland, Eastonia, Latvia, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. The Special Operations assets – Civil Affairs and PSYOP – go into Kyiv. Then I’d put the Wasp and Kearsarge Amphibious Warfare Groups (AWG) into theater. Wasp and her float off of Finland and Kearsarge and her float in the Black Sea. I’d keep the carrier group farther out for now. In fact I’d put it in the Irish Sea and even more specifically in the “Irish Box” between Ireland and England. I’d also want Air Force Special Operations – Air Commandos and Para-Rescue, as well as forward observer controllers who paint targets – moved into theater. I’d also want our NATO allies to keep doing what they’re doing, put moving three or four Dutch F-16s to Poland isn’t sufficient either.

Just so that everyone else knows, and courtesy of Leto, the forward observer controllers are formally referred to as Tactical Air Controllers (TACs) and a group of them are known as a Tactical Air Control Party (TACP).

There are three reasons for the suggestions I made last night and that I’ve copied and pasted above. The first is the strategist’s and policy maker’s dilemma: how much risk is one willing to assume. Right now every time something seems to bring some clarity to what Putin may be doing or might be planning to do something else then brings a new layer of obscurity to the situation. This means that President Biden and his team, as well as NATO’s leadership, the leadership of our EU partners and allies, and of our non-NATO European partners and allies have to determine how much risk they want to assume given that things are not particularly clear. Rotating an appropriate amount of military capability into the theater provides us with the ability to manage and mitigate the potential risk arising from Putin’s actions. They give us the ability to have a warm start should that unfortunately be necessary. I was assigned, under temporary assigned control (TACON), to the US Army Europe Commanding General in 2014. I was at his headquarters in January 2014 when the signals began to become clear that Putin was going to invade Ukraine. And, as a result, I know what it is like when the theater army commanding general does not have enough capability to be able to undertake his contingency plan to respond should it become necessary to do so.

Let me just take a moment and anticipate a rebuttal to this. Specifically that I’m letting my experience from 2014 color my judgement now. This is a legitimate question. I don’t think it is happening though. Our military footprint in the EU is not what it was even a decade ago despite some rotating, short term deployments to Poland. Given that we’ve steadily drawn down our military presence in the EU and relocated back to the US, temporarily relocating a force large enough to allow us to credibly respond if necessary would make sense in terms of mitigating and managing risk.

The second reason that I think we should do an increase way beyond just placing 8,500 personnel on standby is to reassure our allies. Sweden and Finland, which are not NATO allies, but do have security partnerships with the US, as well as Norway, which is a NATO member, are all exceedingly concerned regarding Putin’s actions. So are our NATO allies Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland. The Swedes have sent military personnel to reinforce Gotland because senior Russian military and civilian officials, as well as state controlled Russian media have been agitating to try to take it. Never mind that the last time non-Swedes tried this it got their stångas kicked. Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania see themselves as the frontline of conflict if Putin decides to probe for mush and, along with Poland, have moved towards a war footing just to be ready.

The need to reassure our allies is just as important as the need to deter our potential adversaries. It is especially important in order to further rebuild the trust that was eroded during the Trump administration when Trump would never miss an opportunity to denigrate our alliances, crap all over our allies, and suck up to the leaders of hostile powers and potential peer competitors. Usually all at the same time. Remember, Trump, as he was scheming to bring his autogolpe to successful fruition also ordered Acting Secretary of Defense Miller to pull all of our military personnel out of Germany by the end of January 2021. It is understandable if you had forgotten this. I can assure you that our allies and partners certainly have not forgotten. Reassurance, like deterrence, also helps to manage and mitigate risk.

The third and final reason I made the suggestion is that a lot of people are throwing around that what President Biden and his team are proposing is to small a response, but they rarely put down specifics. Some of this is because the people making the criticisms are just criticizing in order to criticize. Some just don’t have the expertise and experience to name specific elements in specific amounts. I am not criticizing just to criticize. I have either worked on or closely followed this problem set since January 2014. I have spent a lot of time thinking about what might be necessary, in terms of troop deployments, to give us a successful warm start if Putin decided he really wanted to challenge the US and NATO. I’m not just making lists to make lists.

For instance, there’s a reason I’ve got Civil Affairs built into this. Specifically because they’ve been working, albeit slowly due to a variety of constraints, to reconstitute their historic mission from World War II: military support to government. And the reason I named this specific Civil Affairs brigade is that among its leadership is the colonel that did the vast, vast majority of the concept development to bring this important and historic capability back. No one knows it better. And I know this because I was the subject matter expert assigned to assist him by his commanding officer at the time. This wasn’t just: I’ll throw some CA bubbas in so they’re not left out. The same thing with the PSYOP teams. Yes, as I’ve indicated several times, I’ve done work with the Army PSYOP community over the years, but given that Russian military doctrine is to never begin kinetic operations until the theater has been prepared through psychological and information operations, it would make sense to put the tactical PSYOPers where they can do the most good. I will suggest, with a day’s worth of reflection, that they should go to Estonia, which has worked very hard to build an effective counter-PSYOP capability.

We can fairly quickly lay on an extended war game with our NATO and non-NATO allies, similar to what the Russians are doing with the Belarusians, and conduct the deployment within that dynamic. But, regardless, having the capabilities in place to respond if necessary is always better than not having them when you need them.

Just one final point, as Gin & Tonic pointed out in a comment to BettyC’s post on Ukraine earlier today, this thread is spot on! Specifically the author’s discussion of the reality that for Ukraine, they are and have been at war with Russia, what the author refers too as permanent war, since at least 2014.

https://twitter.com/EHunterChristie/status/1487110307457740801

This is why I have been saying, over and over and over, and will continue to do so, since I began writing on the front page here that we are at war. It may not be a kinetic war. It may not be a lethal war. Or, at least not always, but we are and have been at war with Russia since at least 2014 and most likely since late 2011/early 2012. Putin and the Russians certainly think so and have acted accordingly for the past 8 to 11 years. It would behoove us to finally begin to take this to heart and act accordingly.

I’ll leave it there.

Open thread!

The Strategist’s & Policy Maker’s Dilemma: Assumption of RiskPost + Comments (77)

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 138
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - frosty - 3rd Annual National Park/COVID Challenge - Oregon - Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area - Engineering
Photo by frosty (4/3/26)
Donate

Election Resources

Voter Registration Info – Find a State
Check Voter Registration by Address
Election Calendar by State

Targeted Fundraising Info & Links

Recent Comments

  • NotMax on Open Thread: RETVRN (to the Religious Wars) (Apr 3, 2026 @ 8:05pm)
  • Bupalos on Open Thread: RETVRN (to the Religious Wars) (Apr 3, 2026 @ 8:04pm)
  • Fair Economist on Open Thread: RETVRN (to the Religious Wars) (Apr 3, 2026 @ 8:04pm)
  • Gin & Tonic on Open Thread: RETVRN (to the Religious Wars) (Apr 3, 2026 @ 8:03pm)
  • WaterGirl on How about a (wide open) Open Thread? (Apr 3, 2026 @ 8:03pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Outsmarting Apple iOS 26

Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Order Calendar A
Order Calendar B

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix
Rose Judson (podcast)

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Privacy Manager

Copyright © 2026 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc