Everything the Pitchbot says here is accurate. Yes, journalists circle the wagons against their critics because a lot of them have thin skins, but there’s also a palpable fear of what conservatives could do to them if they covered Trump the way he ought to be. https://t.co/DoZC97Oouf
— Jeremy Fassler (@J_fassler) September 22, 2024
Sometimes I feel like future historians (assuming such exist) will hunt for some logical explanation of our current media’s consistent failure to treat the current Republican party, as exemplified by TFG and the SC(R)OTUS, as a potentially civilization-ending threat: Microplastics crossing the blood/brain barrier, or epigenetic damage caused by food services at upper-end universities. But it’s really simple: Our Very Serious Media Betters have spent so many years, and grown so prosperous, recycling sewage… that they’ve developed a taste for it!
(1/X) I hate doing these, but I feel like I'm being baited to do so. A few days ago Maggie H did an interview where she complained criticism of her reporting, James Fallows answered back (mentioning this account) and Jon Chait and some Reason bro took a shot at Fallows for…
— New York Times Pitchbot (@DougJBalloon) September 22, 2024
(2/X) praising this account. First things first…Jon Chait and some obscure Reason bro lecturing James Fallows about journalism is ludicrous. Fallows is a legend, a five-time National Magazine Award finalist. More on this later…
(3/X) But first, Maggie admits “The systems are just fundamentally – they were not built to deal with somebody who says things that are not true as often as he does or speaks as incoherently as he (Trump) often does.” That’s exactly the point of all the criticism…
(4/X) of her and the Times’ coverage of Trump. It’s not built for Trump. Trump is hold to lower standards. Let’s just take a couple examples. The Times played a big role in forcing Biden out of the race (which has worked out great for Dems)…
(5/X) Two or three times a week, Trump does something that is more strongly indicative of dementia than anything Biden did during that debate. Is there any move to force him out?
——
(7/X) Likewise, there has been coverage of the hacked Trump campaign emails. I agree it is better not to cover them. But there is no way they wouldn’t be getting covered if they were emails from a Democratic campaign.(8/X) I don’t think anyone can dispute either of those two points: that there’s been no coverage of Trump’s dementia comparable to the discussion of Biden’s age and that hacked Democratic campaign emails would be getting covered.
(9/X). That’s a different standard and one that is markedly lower for Trump. It’s that simple. It doesn’t mean that the Times hasn’t taught the public a lot about Trump. There have been a lot of revealing stories. But they are easier on Trump than on other candidates..
Saturday Night Open Thread: For the Historical ArchivesPost + Comments (186)


You can just hear her asking, like a true 
