Post-racial America

Early Morning Open Thread: Sundown Voters for A Sundowning Party?

by Anne Laurie| December 6, 20163:56 am| 40 Comments

This post is in: Election 2016, Fables Of The Reconstruction, Hail to the Hairpiece, Open Threads, Post-racial America, Republican Stupidity

…that many Americans voted for Trump in an effort to create a "sundown" country.

— Jamelle Bouie (@jbouie) December 3, 2016

There’s more and more evidence coming to light that the Asterisk-Elect’s electoral college victory relied on the revanchist fantasies of some of America’s least loveable left-behinds. David Roediger, at Counterpunch:

… Coming myself from a “sundown town”—that is, one which for most of the twentieth century remained whites-only, in part by disallowing even visits by African Americans after nightfall—I had read the work of the sociologist James Loewen on such places with great care. In the massive volume, Sundown Towns, and on the website accompanying and updating it, Loewen paid special attention to Wisconsin. Partly this was because, proportionately, so many of its towns fit into the sundown category and partly because their histories were so typical. Many had an early Black presence that was removed over time or in a hot moment. Some featured billboards warning of their policies. They included small towns, but also growing industrial ones, whose good, sometimes union, jobs became the property of whites.

Did sundown towns elect Trump in Wisconsin? My research assistant, Kathryn Robinson, and I tried to find out. Since it is much easier to get county-level election returns than municipal ones, we concentrated on “sundown counties,” those having a county seat that could be established as a sundown town or likely sundown town in Loewen’s mapping. An incredible 58 of the state’s 72 counties fit into such a category. Of the 58 sundown counties 31 are 1% or less African American (and only eight more than 2%), suggesting that the proxy of the county seat works in identifying sundown areas at the county level.

The simple answer on Trump and sundown towns in Wisconsin is: “Clearly they elected him.” Sundown counties gave Trump almost 935,000 votes to Clinton’s just over 678,000. His margin in the sundown areas exceeded 256,000 votes. That Clinton won the fifteen non-sundown counties by almost 230,000 votes could not make up for Trump’s 58% to 42% margin in the sundown ones. Just short of two/thirds of all Trump voters in Wisconsin came from sundown counties. Only nine sundown counties chose Clinton with 49 for Trump…

Trump overperformed the most in counties with the highest drug, alcohol & suicide mortality rates. See full brief at https://t.co/z1wUDM99E1 pic.twitter.com/2bAkfgt67Q

— Shannon Monnat (@smonnat) December 5, 2016

Of course, the NYTimes‘ Media Village Idiots are busily attempting to buff away these angry white fingerprints, because calling someone a racist is far more impolite than being a racist…

show full post on front page

Not even those most depressed about Donald J. Trump’s election and what it might portend could have envisioned the scene that took place just before Thanksgiving in a meeting room a few blocks from the White House. The white nationalist Richard B. Spencer was rallying about 200 kindred spirits.

“We are not meant to live in shame and weakness and disgrace,” he said. “We were not meant to beg for moral validation from some of the most despicable creatures to ever populate the planet.” When Mr. Spencer shouted, “Hail, Trump! Hail, our people! Hail, victory!” a scattered half-dozen men stood and raised their arms in Nazi salutes.

Mr. Spencer, however you describe him, calls himself a part of the “alt-right” — a new term for an informal and ill-defined collection of internet-based radicals. As such, he poses a complication for the incoming president. Stephen K. Bannon, the executive chairman of Breitbart News, whom Mr. Trump has picked as his chief White House strategist, told an interviewer in July that he considered Breitbart a “platform for the alt-right.”

Perhaps we should not make too much of this. Mr. Bannon may have meant something quite different by the term. Last summer “alt-right,” though it carried overtones of extremism, was not an outright synonym for ideologies like Mr. Spencer’s. But in late August, Hillary Clinton devoted a speech to the alt-right, calling it simply a new label for an old kind of white supremacy that Mr. Trump was shamelessly exploiting…

The alt-right is not a large movement, but the prominence that it is enjoying in the early days of the Trump era may tell us something about the way the country is changing. At least since the end of the Cold War, and certainly since the election of a black president in 2008, America’s shifting identity — political, cultural and racial — has given rise to many questions about who we are as a nation. But one kind of answer was off the table: the suggestion that America’s multicultural present might, in any way, be a comedown from its past had become a taboo. This year a candidate broke it. He promised to “make America great again.” And he won the presidency…

As someone steeped in the history of the alt-right, some thoughts on this soon-to-be-widely-read NYT essay: https://t.co/M4FOPRovBA /1

— Nicole Hemmer (@pastpunditry) December 4, 2016

It imputes innocence to anyone who is not a member of an explicitly white nationalist organization. /3

— Nicole Hemmer (@pastpunditry) December 4, 2016

It blames liberals for white nat’lsm & the alt-right, arguing it’s a backlash to multiculturalism rather than the bedrock of US politics. /5

— Nicole Hemmer (@pastpunditry) December 4, 2016

@NaraMovak Here you go: https://t.co/1zIk0wZeoN

— Nicole Hemmer (@pastpunditry) December 4, 2016

Read this thread, a demolition of that Alt-right crap in the NYT. I’ll add this: the electoral relationship is lethal for the GOP long term… https://t.co/XXnZYVvCLA

— Dana Houle (@DanaHoule) December 4, 2016

3/…might be dandies, and of course there are plenty of racist young people. But electorally, that wasn’t a dandy electorate backing Trump…

— Dana Houle (@DanaHoule) December 4, 2016

5/…association w an administration pursuing policies mostly of Steve Pence—both, imo, highly unlikely—that’s a bad long term strategy. Of…

— Dana Houle (@DanaHoule) December 4, 2016

7/…doesn’t change laws such that they make it impossible for Dems to win—and they may!—long-term I’d rather be a Dem than a Repub

— Dana Houle (@DanaHoule) December 4, 2016

10/…as effective in curbing the growth of the alt-right as anything overtly political.

— Dana Houle (@DanaHoule) December 4, 2016

Early Morning Open Thread: Sundown Voters for A Sundowning Party?Post + Comments (40)

Pastoral Scene of the Gallant South

by John Cole| December 5, 20164:11 pm| 113 Comments

This post is in: Post-racial America, Shitty Cops, Get Angry

It’s 2016, but it might as well be 1816 in South Carolina if you are an unarmed black man and a white cop wants to kill you:

A judge declared a mistrial Monday afternoon in the fatal shooting of an unarmed black man at the hands of a South Carolina former patrolman, after the jury said they could not come to a unanimous verdict.

In a statement read by Circuit Judge Clifton Newman, the jury said “We as the jury regret to inform the court” that they were unable to come “to a unanimous decision in the case of the state versus Michael Slager” on Monday afternoon after a day of questions and deliberation.

“The court therefore must declare a mistrial in this case and I so declare that is case is mistried,” he said after the jury returned to the room and confirmed their decision.

The jury had remained undecided — but not deadlocked — on Monday in the murder trial.

The defense in ex-patrolman Michael Slager’s the five-week trial claimed that he feared for his life when 50-year-old Walter Scott got control of the officer’s stun gun and pointed it at him.

Here’s the video of him chasing Scott, stopping, taking up a shooting stance, and unloading his service weapon into the unarmed man running AWAY from him:

He must have been really “scared.”

It’s now official. You can be executed by the cops, on video, have the cop plant evidence on your still bleeding body, again, on video, have the cop be heard tittering about the adrenaline rush, on audio, and you will not receive justice. But let’s place the blame where it really lies- on Colin Kaepernick for not standing during the National Anthem.

My biggest fear in the next few years with the rise of the neo-nazis and the white supremacists and the normalization of the Trump racist right is that we are going to see this kind of thing, both the shooting and the white holdout on the jury, happening more and more often. Basically, jury nullification in any offense in which the black man is the victim and the aggressor is white. The justice system has never have been equitable for black people in America, but now that it is “acceptable” to be openly racist in public and not only that, get elected President and be appointed to his staff, we are going to see a lot more of this.

In the past, we could rely on the Federal government and the Justice Department to at least make an attempt to address these concerns. But with racist ass Jeff Sessions running the DOJ, it’s going to get worse. Not only will he and the DOJ not pursue these cases, but he will also be gutting the voting rights of minorities so they don’t even have any redress at the ballot box, and on top of that, he is an anti-marijuana zealot and will ramp up on the drug war. You’re all bright people and don’t need a refresher course on the disparate impact of the drug war on people of color.

This is a slowly unfolding disaster. I’m sick. The Klan doesn’t even need to wear robes in public anymore.

Pastoral Scene of the Gallant SouthPost + Comments (113)

Thinking Security

by Adam L Silverman| December 2, 20168:00 pm| 204 Comments

This post is in: America, Domestic Politics, Don't Mourn, Organize, Open Threads, Organizing & Resistance, Politics, Popular Culture, Post-racial America, Silverman on Security

Several of you have asked in comments or by email if I’d write a little bit (a lot of bit?) about security. Specifically, personal security. I intended to get this up earlier in the week, but things went sideways on Tuesday, then did an inversion on Wednesday, then a triple lindy yesterday, so…

The first thing that I think is important is something I, and several others, have stressed here in posts and comments: freaking out is not a useful activity. I’m not stating that to pooh pooh anyone’s reactions to the elections, whether they be anger, fear, anxiety, stress, depression, or any combination thereof. All of these are normal and understandable responses. And, of course, if you are feeling really overwhelmed and are having trouble finding/regaining your equilibrium please go see a professional counselor or therapist.

The second thing is don’t do this!

CLEVELAND – Police are investigating the theft of seven guns swiped from a Cleveland home sometime early Tuesday morning.

A mom and her two children were asleep upstairs when she said the thief or thieves broke into the home and cleaned out two gun cabinets. “They’re ready for a war, we were ready for a war,” said Teena Brayen

Brayen and her family are doomsday preppers. “We’re preppers, we believe in preparing for what could happen,” said Brayen.

And:

The Brayens are part of the Three Percenters Club, a militia group that ‘exists to… protect and defend the constitution and our way of life’ by helping people ‘execute Military Strategies to defend against foreign and domestic enemies’.

But the items they wanted to use to defend against invasion in Rome made them a target for invasion in Cleveland.

On November 22, burglars – who, Brayen believes, spotted the weapons when she was moving into the home – took seven guns, 12 machetes, body armor, smoke grenades, more than $1,000 in ammo and some of their food.

Two gun cabinets were emptied of their contents: a high-powered, armor-piercing sniper rifle; five shotguns, and a pellet gun.

Leaving aside the Brayens and the Three Percenters Club, which is not the same as the other Three Percenters, what was missing here was a failure to think security.

Thinking security means to proactively consider what the potential threats might be in order to establish effective, reasonable solutions to them. This means to consider what the potential threats and dangers are to oneself, one’s family, and one’s property (home, business, etc) and what reasonable steps should be taken ahead of time to either deter them or, should deterrence fail, respond to them in the most effective and safe manner possible. This is not just for human threats like crime or terrorism, but also for preparing to deal with natural or man made disasters such as a hurricane or blizzard or earthquake or a gas main explosion or a fracking induced sinkhole or earthquake. To do this one needs to consider several questions.

Who or what is the threat? And what kind of threat is it?
Does the location, item, and/or person need to be secured against a potential threat?
What is the extent of the location’s vulnerability?
Does the potential security countermeasure need to be human, animal, technological, or a combination of them?
How far can I, and how would I go about, extending my secure zone away from myself, my family, my home, etc?
What effect will the potential security response have on me, my family, my friends, my neighbors, my employees, coworkers, and/or customers?

show full post on front page

If you live in Florida and you’re largely concerned with hurricane season (and the occasional Floriduh man and woman), the answers are going to focus on how to secure one’s home, business, and/or other property from high winds, driving rains, storm surge, and flooding. Your response is going to focus on ensuring that you and your family have enough supplies – food and water, medications, alternate power sources, other emergency supplies – to either shelter in place and ride the storm out or the resources to evacuate early or to evacuate ahead of the storm to an acceptable shelter. And don’t forget to think about what to do with your pets!

However, if your concern now is a response to the uptick and spike in hate crimes since the election, then your potential responses would be different. And this is where I want to change the tack of the discussion a bit. Personal security that arises from the fear of other people, even when that fear is or may be rational, is not the same thing as just making sure you’ve got a week’s worth of food, water, etc and a generator in case of a bad storm. While the questions above may still be applicable, the consideration of them needs to shift. The first thing that will need to be done is to grapple with whether there is a very real threat that needs to be deterred or that might need to be responded to. There’s no one size fits all solution because there are far too many variables for me or anyone else to just write: if you do X, you’ll be fine.

Keeping this caveat in mind here are a few things you can do to enhance your and your family’s personal security, as well as security at your business, congregation, or any other organization you belong to.

Invest in good locks: for under $200 you can put good quality deadbolts on your doors, as well as additional locking mechanisms on sliding glass doors/windows and window frames so you can open your windows a bit for ventilation and not have to worry about them being forced. You can also, for a reasonable price, harden your doors if you don’t have heavy duty/security doors.
Invest in some motion sensor lights if you live in such a place that would allow you to install them. I tend to use the solar powered ones. They’re not as bright, but I don’t have to worry about batteries or the electricity going out.
If you’ve been thinking about getting a dog keep in mind that many of them will make a good early warning system and decide if you want to include that consideration when you adopt.
If you have a garage, park your car/cars in it. (Yes, this means you have to get your stuff out of the way and no, I have no idea why builders in PA build 3+ bedroom homes with one car garages)
Install a video doorbell, preferably one with motion sensing tech that alerts you, via your phone or tablet, and gives you video when someone just approaches the door regardless of if they ring the bell.
Get a few, good, high lumen flashlights (I like the Anker ones). Carry a small one in your purse if you carry a purse or in your pocket and keep a larger one accessible in the car. Blinding light right in the eyes can work wonders. As can prodding someone with one if necessary.
Make sure your smoke detector batteries are good, your CO2 detector batteries are good (if you have one of these), and your fire extinguishers are also up to date.
Make a plan with your family, and if you and your neighbors get on well, with your neighbors. It should include who is going to contact and check in with who, where to meet up, who is responsible for securing or taking care of or picking up who, what to do in case of a natural or man made disaster such as a hurricane or flood or earthquake. Things like that. This should also be done for your business, congregation, and other organizations you belong to.
Make sure you and at least one other family member has CPR and first aid training. And make a first aid kit in something portable like a backpack. I like the Mayo Clinic’s suggestions for what to get.

This brings us to the final two things that I think need to be addressed. The first is fear or anxiety or stress. If you are having this type of response and its making you feel vulnerable, and you want to do something to prepare for the worst do not take a self defense course. People that take self defense courses go in scared and able to be hurt or killed. They come out scared and able to hurt or kill. These types of courses are not designed to get at the underlying issues in a systematic way. So if you feel you have to do something, and you’re willing to give it a try, skip right to a martial art taught by a legitimate and experienced instructor. The purpose of this training isn’t just, or isn’t really, the physical components of strike, lock, pin, but rather to use the psycho-motor skills training of learning them to access the internal energy, psychological, emotional, and mental components of those who study these systems and disciplines. It’ll take longer to be physically proficient, but you’ll start to see some of the internal benefits in a few months. Between myself and several of the other martial artists that comment here, we should be able to provide some suggestions in the comments.

The final one is firearms. To me this is an even more intensely personal question or issue. Guns, both handguns and long guns, are tools. In the right hands at the right times in the right places they can be tremendously effective. In other hands at other times and at other places not so much. As I mentioned in the comments to several questions about this, as well as to several emails from commenters/lurkers, I came to the use of firearms very late (I was 37) and for professional reasons (as part of my pre deployment training for Iraq). I had been doing martial arts for 24 years at that point and had some basic familiarity instruction with guns, but not a lot of practice or experience. Now, because I’ve been asked at least once a year for the past four years, if I would be willing to deploy, I go for regular training with a SWAT tactical training instructor to maintain my skills. I’m not recommending anyone get one and I’m not recommending one not getting one. I’m not advocating for anything here, nor should any decision I may or may not make in regard to firearms be an example for anyone else.

That said there are several questions that one needs to answer for themselves when considering getting a firearm, especially if its for self defense purposes

Do you, your spouse/SO, parent child/children, roommate, or anyone else that might be living with you think that if push came to shove you could bring the weapon to bear and shoot it if necessary (seriously injuring and/or killing what you are aiming at, whether person or animal)? If you all can not answer yes without qualifications, you shouldn’t get it. Having it and being unable to use it is as bad, if not worse, than not having it.
Are you,your spouse/SO, parent child/children, roommate, or anyone else that might be living with you willing to commit to proper instruction and training in the use and maintenance of a firearm?
Do you have a plan to secure the weapon, but in such a way that it is accessible when needed?
Does anyone in the home have a mental health issue? If so you may not want to bring a gun into the dynamic. And if someone in the home should develop a mental health issue, do you have a plan for securing the weapon away from him or her (offsite) and an alternative self-defense/security plan for once the gun is removed?
Do you want this only for home defense or are you planning on conceal carrying it?
Put your hand in your pocket. Now have someone run at you from 33 feet away while screaming at you. Try to remove your hand from your pocket and point it at the person running at you before they can touch you on the shoulder. If this exercise freaked you out, getting a gun for self defense may not be for you. Are you willing to commit to regular instruction from a professional to overcome this response? If not, then getting a gun for self defense may not be for you.
Do you want a long gun (rifle or shotgun) or handgun (self loading semi-automatic pistol or revolver)? If its a handgun, how is your hand strength? Are you able to rack the slide/charge a semi-auto pistol? If not, then a revolver might be better. How is your arm strength? Revolvers with barrels of four inches or longer will be quite heavy? As will be some rifles and shotguns?
Where do you live? An apartment? A Condo? A one wall attached house? A single family home? All of these are considerations in regard to firearm and ammunition choice.

I think that’s enough for now. I’ll be around in comments.

Thinking SecurityPost + Comments (204)

@Rschooley That's actually the Maggiano's on Wisconsin Ave in DC. They were there on Friday night. https://t.co/3ZtX956jc8

— vonceyb (@vonceyb) November 21, 2016

ETA: Original tweet got removed by Twitter, for some reason or other…

Seig heil! ? pic.twitter.com/FhuFuZq6Sc

— Tila Tequila (@AngelTilaLove) November 19, 2016

Of course our new Nazis won't know how to spell Nazi slogans. https://t.co/h8dWHgIV57

— Josh Barro (@jbarro) November 19, 2016

The actual factual term is "neo-Nazi." If you trace the roots of the movement to their origin, you end up at Stormfront and other hate sites

— Andray D. (@AndrayDomise) November 18, 2016

No, seriously: This happened. Rosie Gray, at Buzzfeed:

The white nationalist alt-right movement, once the very definition of fringe politics, is facing a truly unexpected scenario: Their preferred candidate is about to be in the White House.

To capitalize on this turn of events, alt-right leaders held a press conference on Saturday at the gathering of the National Policy Institute, the white nationalist think tank headed by Richard Spencer. The event was held in the Ronald Reagan Building in downtown Washington, and attracted vigorous protests outside.

Spencer appeared onstage with VDare’s Peter Brimelow, anti-Semitic writer Kevin MacDonald, Arktos editor Jason Jorjani, and American Renaissance founder Jared Taylor. More than two dozen reporters were in attendance, a stark shift from previous alt-right gatherings that attracted fewer. Behind the press conference, the rest of the NPI attendees gathered to watch, at times booing and jeering the reporters when they asked questions. The audience was nearly all young, white, and male, with some sporting Make America Great Again hats and many displaying the “fashy” cropped-sides haircut common to the movement….

[N.B.: That’s ‘fashy’ for ‘facist’. They’re proud of who they are.]

The alt-right, Spencer said, had before the election been like a “head without a body,” trapped in internal conversations and debates.

“The Trump movement was a kind of body without a head,” Spencer said, saying that Trump’s campaign had been “half-baked” on policy despite having the right instincts on foreign policy and immigration. “I think moving forward the alt-right as an intellectual vanguard can complete Trump.” Spencer, who can take credit for coining the name of the movement, believes the alt-right has a “psychic connection” with Trump in a way they do not with other Republicans. Indeed, the very name of the alt-right indicates its wish to disassociate itself from the wider right: An important part of its project is to challenge and dismantle the conservative movement.

Spencer and the others are careful not to identify Trump himself as alt-right, nor his campaign CEO and soon-to-be White House chief strategist Steve Bannon. The alt-right leaders are aware of their political radioactivity and seek to not harm Trump by linking arms too firmly with him. “I don’t think Steve Bannon is alt-right as I would define the term,” Spencer said, saying Bannon has no direct connection to the movement but that “I think a few of us have shaken his hand” and that there is “common ground” between the beliefs of Bannon and those of the alt-right…

So much common ground, that the two Venn diagram circles are locked in close embrace.

… Now that Trump has won, the alt-right must grapple with policy in real-world terms. NPI plans to start putting out policy papers as recommendations for the Trump administration going forward (regardless of whether these specific plans will ever have audience in the White House); the first, out now, is called “Beyond NATO.” One proposal by Spencer is to institute a 50-year freeze on net immigration. He also spoke approvingly of Ivanka Trump’s federally sponsored maternity leave proposals, and of the choice of Sen. Jeff Sessions as attorney general. Spencer told me later that he’s also proposing a “less is more” idea in which there is less college attendance and college is reserved for a “cognitive elite,” and a “greatness agenda” involving wildlife conservation…

Translation: State support for white babymakers, old-school racists in charge of the judiciary, college education once again reserved for white Christian men, and license for the NRA to run wild in national parks.

How American journalism dies: normalizing white nationalists & holding photo shoots to let them pose for puff pieces https://t.co/K78Bi9aYg0

— Adam Jentleson (@AJentleson) November 21, 2016

show full post on front page

Alt-right leader praises Sessions for AG, says white Europeans should be only group that can attain new citizenship. https://t.co/28M6Yy3cFp

— Edward M. Davis (@TeddyDavisCNN) November 20, 2016

White nationalists and Nazi-saluting Tila Tequila toast "Emperor Trump" in Washington, DC: https://t.co/xAyRevklzs pic.twitter.com/MNr07PRSTx

— The Daily Beast (@thedailybeast) November 19, 2016

… There were panel discussions on “Trump and the new white voter,” and “Trump and being a man.” There was a presser where Spencer (who was a staunch Trump fan, worked in college-campus activism with one of the Trump campaign’s senior advisers, and works hard to try to mainstream extreme immigration and racial policies such as “peaceful ethnic cleansing” for a “white homeland”) got to chuckle and take questions from all-serious, thoroughly cucked political reporters. Cocktails, free coffee, and mediocre catered chicken were served, and Trump swag and Harambe shirts were sold.

And Tila Tequila, the Hitler-sympathizing, Trump-loving, Singapore-born former MTV personality, was there to support her friend Richard Spencer…

Tequila, a “politically incorrect” one-time reality-TV star (much like our next president!) and model, has dabbled in casual anti-Semitism and pro-Nazi declarations over the years, to the point where she has been condemned by the Anti-Defamation League. “This is clearly a person who is desperate for publicity at all costs,” an ADL spokesman told me in December 2013, shortly after Tequila posted a Facebook image of herself in sexy-Nazi garb…

“The Alt-Right has been declared the winner [of this presidential election],” Spencer said on the night Trump defeated Hillary Clinton. “The Alt-Right is more deeply connected to Trumpian populism than the ‘conservative movement.’”

“We’re the establishment now,” he concluded.

It’s all fun and memes, until they start rounding up the Untermenschen. Even the adamantly BothSides NYTimes was alarmed to the point of taking the group seriously — “Alt-Right Exults in Donald Trump’s Election With a Salute: ‘Heil Victory’”:

By the time Richard B. Spencer, the leading ideologue of the alt-right movement and the final speaker of the night, rose to address a gathering of his followers on Saturday, the crowd was restless.

In 11 hours of speeches and panel discussions in a federal building named after Ronald Reagan a few blocks from the White House, a succession of speakers had laid out a harsh vision for the future, but had denounced violence and said that Hispanic citizens and black Americans had nothing to fear. Earlier in the day, Mr. Spencer himself had urged the group to start acting less like an underground organization and more like the establishment.

But now his tone changed as he began to tell the audience of more than 200 people, mostly young men, what they had been waiting to hear. He railed against Jews and, with a smile, quoted Nazi propaganda in the original German. America, he said, belonged to white people, whom he called the “children of the sun,” a race of conquerors and creators who had been marginalized but now, in the era of President-elect Donald J. Trump, were “awakening to their own identity.”

As he finished, several audience members had their arms outstretched in a Nazi salute. When Mr. Spencer, or perhaps another person standing near him at the front of the room — it was not clear who — shouted, “Heil the people! Heil victory,” the room shouted it back…

At the conference on Saturday, Mr. Spencer, who said he had coined the term, defined the alt-right as a movement with white identity as its core idea.

“We’ve crossed the Rubicon in terms of recognition,” Mr. Spencer said at the conference, which was sponsored by his organization, the National Policy Institute….

The United States today, Mr. Spencer said, had been turned into “a sick, corrupted society.” But it was not supposed to be that way.

“America was, until this last generation, a white country designed for ourselves and our posterity,” Mr. Spencer thundered. “It is our creation, it is our inheritance, and it belongs to us.”…

“Trump and Steve Bannon are not alt-right people,” Mr. Brimelow [of VDare] said, adding that they had opportunistically seized on two issues that the alt-right cares most about — stopping immigration and fighting political correctness — and used them to mobilize white voters.

Mr. Spencer said that while he did not think the president-elect should be considered alt-right, “I do think we have a psychic connection, or you can say a deeper connection, with Donald Trump in a way that we simply do not have with most Republicans.”

White identity, he said, is at the core of both the alt-right movement and the Trump movement, even if most voters for Mr. Trump “aren’t willing to articulate it as such.”…

THIS IS ON YOU, REPUBLICANS. Even if you claim that you, personally, don’t agree with the ‘alt-right’ neo-Nazis, you voted to install a man known to be sympathetic to the neo-Nazis — because you felt that winning took priority over your principles. You voted clan over conscience.

I'd like to propose a new term for them: "Alt-White." @AJentleson https://t.co/Ohzy7Ikp8q

— Eric Kleefeld (@EricKleefeld) November 20, 2016

“But as the night wore on and most reporters had gone home, the language changed.” https://t.co/bn7I0DR6mL pic.twitter.com/rEMBPICWfG

— Michael Calderone (@mlcalderone) November 21, 2016

Richard Spencer mobbed by die Lugenpresse pic.twitter.com/egsikLRNZu

— Dave Weigel (@daveweigel) November 19, 2016

Celebratory Gathering of Happy Trump SupportersPost + Comments (79)

People are weird.

Speaking of republicans, is there a way for a political party to declare intellectual bankruptcy?

Damn right I heard that as a threat.

Fight for a just cause, love your fellow man, live a good life.

You can’t attract Republican voters. You can only out organize them.

Boeing: repeatedly making the case for high speed rail.

Republicans can’t even be trusted with their own money.

Hi god, it’s us. Thanks a heap, you’re having a great week and it’s only Thursday!

No Justins, No Peace

Too often we confuse noise with substance. too often we confuse setbacks with defeat.

Red lights blinking on democracy’s dashboard

Republicans want to make it harder to vote and easier for them to cheat.

Their freedom requires your slavery.

Roe isn’t about choice, it’s about freedom.

There’s always a light at the end of the frog.

Books are my comfort food!

Fight them, without becoming them!

Republicans got rid of McCarthy. Democrats chose not to save him.

At some point, the ability to learn is a factor of character, not IQ.

He imagines himself as The Big Bad, Who Is Universally Feared… instead of The Big Jagoff, Who Is Universally Mocked.

Stamping your little feets and demanding that they see how important you are? Not working anymore.

It’s always darkest before the other shoe drops.

There are more Russians standing up to Putin than Republicans.

No one could have predicted…

Early Morning Open Thread: Sundown Voters for A Sundowning Party?

Pastoral Scene of the Gallant South

Thinking Security