Libraries are for everybody, or they’re for no one.
— James Felix Black (@tft.io) March 8, 2026 at 7:03 PM
“I’ve been consuming nothing but trash, so I thought I’d brush up on the classics.”
— carbonoperator (@carbonoperator.bsky.social) March 8, 2026 at 8:07 PM
******
This disgusting shit doesn’t belong in American society.
And Republicans who support it don’t belong in Congress.— Katherine Clark (@whipkclark.bsky.social) March 9, 2026 at 11:24 AM
Instead of lowering prices for you, Republicans are busy dreaming up new ways to make the rich even richer.
Here’s their latest idea: sidestepping Congress to hand another giant tax cut to the top 1%.— Elizabeth Warren (@warren.senate.gov) March 9, 2026 at 7:25 PM
www.washingtonpost.com/business/202…
— Elizabeth Warren (@warren.senate.gov) March 9, 2026 at 7:25 PM
Always a wise move to make Ted Cruz the face of the GOP’s latest outrageous ask:
… Sens. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Tim Scott (R-South Carolina) will send a letter to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Tuesday urging him to use executive authority to reduce some of the taxes paid on capital gains — a change that would lower the tax burden on Americans selling stocks, businesses, homes and other assets, according to a copy obtained by The Washington Post ahead of its release. The senators argue the administration does not need congressional approval to make the shift, although some conservative legal experts and Treasury officials have disagreed with that conclusion in the past…
The plan pushed by Cruz and Scott has been sought by conservatives for many years. Under current law, an investor who bought $100 worth of stock in 1990 and sold it today for $300 would currently owe capital gains taxes on the full $200 in profit. But the $100 investment in 1990 would be worth roughly $230 in today’s dollars after accounting for inflation. Under the Cruz-Scott proposal, the investor would only owe taxes on that $70, rather than the full $200. That is why the proposal is known as “indexing capital gains for inflation.”…
The proposal, however, faces significant legal and political headwinds. A 1992 opinion by the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel concluded that Treasury does not have the authority to make such a change unilaterally — and that it would require an act of Congress. Any executive action along these lines would likely face immediate legal challenges.
Critics also argue that the benefits would flow overwhelmingly to the wealthy. The Penn Wharton Budget Model found during Trump’s first term that the top 1 percent of income earners would receive roughly 86 percent of the benefits from indexing capital gains to inflation, while the bottom 80 percent of earners would receive just 1 percent…
government small enough to fit inside every child's bedroom and pick out their clothes every school day
— Henry (@henrythedog.bsky.social) March 10, 2026 at 12:46 AM
A high-powered Chicago law firm announced a plan Monday to push for the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate and potentially charge the agents who carried out Operation Midway Blitz.
@sophiesherry.bsky.social reports: chicago.suntimes.com/crime/2026/0…— Jon Seidel (@jonseidel.bsky.social) March 9, 2026 at 10:01 PM
BREAKING: Alexander Butterfield, the Richard Nixon aide who disclosed the Watergate tapes, dies at 99.
— The Associated Press (@apnews.com) March 9, 2026 at 3:51 PM





