The world will be watching the @nytimes coverage of Ivanka Trump’s emails.
— Neera Tanden (@neeratanden) November 20, 2018
No surprise: The Thief-in-Chief’s “princess” acts as though the law doesn’t apply to her, because when has it ever?
Hot take: This news will change exactly zero opinions about the Trump Crime Family… but the NYTimes is (further) beclowning itself, because the suits responsible for assigning front-page headlines have decided they can’t back down now…
Lots of 2016 comparisons being thrown around, but this can’t be a case of ignorance, carelessness, or even the search for convenience. This is a function of pure hubris. She did it because she thought the rules, well litigated in 2016, didn’t apply to her. https://t.co/3YvAbu9F5w
— Ned Price (@nedprice) November 20, 2018
A review by White House ethics officials revealed that throughout much of 2017, Trump often discussed or relayed official White House business using a private email account with a domain that she shares with her husband, Jared Kushner. https://t.co/5IXUBOofxy
— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) November 19, 2018
The White House Counsel’s Office did not have access to Ivanka's personal account and could not review it without possibly violating privileged communications with her attorneys. So the first daughter's lawyers got to decide what was relevant and what to hold back.
— James Hohmann (@jameshohmann) November 19, 2018
Looking forward to the House hearings on Ivanka's email practices. Maybe they can combine it w a look at the security of her father's cellphone use.
— Garance Franke-Ruta (@thegarance) November 19, 2018
Tuesday Morning Open Thread: Second Time, As FarcePost + Comments (156)